Ropinirole improves depressive symptoms and restless legs syndrome severity in RLS patients: a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Comorbid depressive symptoms in restless legs syndrome (RLS) remain a treatment challenge, as some antidepressants aggravate RLS symptoms. Preliminary data in depressive patients suggest antidepressant properties of ropinirole. The present study investigates the effects of ropinirole immediate release (IR) on depressive symptoms and RLS severity. A multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized (3:1) study was performed including patients with moderate to severe idiopathic RLS and at least mild depressive symptoms. Ropinirole IR (in flexible doses up to 4 mg/day) or placebo was given for 12 weeks including an uptitration phase of 7 weeks. Visits were scheduled at screening, baseline, and weeks 1, 4, and 12 with additional telephone contacts for dosing decisions. The modified intent to treat population comprised 231 patients (171 ropinirole, 60 placebo). The MADRS (Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale) scores decreased from baseline to week 12 from 18.8 to 8.7 in the ropinirole group and from 18.4 to 12.1 in the placebo group (primary endpoint, adjusted mean treatment difference −3.6 (95% CI: −5.6 to −1.6, significance in favor of ropinirole: P < 0.001). The superiority of ropinirole compared to placebo was confirmed by the Hamilton Scale for Depression and Beck Depression Inventory-II scores. RLS severity scores (IRLS) decreased by 14.7 (ropinirole) and by 9.9 (placebo, P < 0.001) points. Three out of four subdomains of the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale improved significantly. The findings indicate that mild to moderate depressive symptoms should not be treated before sufficient therapy for RLS. Antidepressant medication can be necessary if depression symptoms still persist even if RLS symptoms are ameliorated.     

A case‐control study on restless legs syndrome in nondialyzed patients with chronic renal failure

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a possible consequence of end‐stage renal disease. However, conclusive data on the association between RLS and chronic renal failure (CRF) in nondialyzed patients are still lacking. The aims of this study were: (1) to look for an association between RLS and CRF in nondialyzed patients; (2) to analyze the characteristics of RLS and its consequences on nocturnal rest in nondialyzed patients with CRF; (3) to identify possible predictors of RLS occurrence in nondialyzed patients with CRF. We recruited 138 nondialyzed patients with CRF (mean age: 69.8 ± 11.7 years; male: 61.6%) and 151 controls (mean age: 60.2 ± 18.6 years; male: 42.4%). An expert in sleep medicine investigated the presence of RLS by means of a face‐to‐face interview. Fifteen nondialyzed CRF patients and five controls were diagnosed as RLS affected. A multivariate analysis confirmed that RLS was independently associated with CRF in nondialyzed patients (P = 0.004). CRF patients RLS⁺ were more commonly women and showed the presence of an iron deficiency compared with the RLS^? ones. Independent predictors of RLS in nondialyzed CRF patients were: female sex (OR: 10.7, 95% CI: 2.2–31.3; P = 0.004) and percentage of transferrin saturation (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4–0.9; P = 0.04). This is the first case‐control study able to recognize an association between RLS and CRF in patients not yet on dialysis. Nephrologists should investigate and treat RLS in their nondialyzed patients with CRF. In particular, physicians should carefully investigate women and patients with iron deficiency in the presence of RLS symptoms. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Rotigotine improves restless legs syndrome: A 6‐month randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled trial in the United States

This randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial (NCT00135993) assessed efficacy and safety of the dopamine agonist rotigotine in the treatment of idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) over a 6‐month maintenance period. A total of 505 eligible participants with moderate to severe RLS (IRLS sum score ≥ 15) were randomly assigned to five groups to receive either placebo or rotigotine (0.5, 1, 2, or 3 mg/24 hr) delivered by once‐daily transdermal patch (fixed‐dose regimen). The two co‐primary efficacy parameters decreased from baseline to end of maintenance in IRLS sum score and in clinical global impressions (CGI‐1) score. On both primary measures, 2 and 3 mg/24 hr rotigotine was superior to placebo (P < 0.001). Adjusted treatment differences to placebo for the IRLS sum score were ?4.5 (95% CI: ?6.9, ?2.2) for 2 mg/24 hr rotigotine, ?5.2 (95% CI: ?7.5, ?2.9) for 3 mg/24 hr rotigotine, and for CGI item 1 ?0.65 (95% CI: ?1.0, ?0.3) and ?0.9 (95% CI: ?1.3, ?0.5) for the 2 and 3 mg/24 hr doses, respectively. Skin reactions (27%) and known dopaminergic side effects such as nausea (18.1%) and headache (11.6%) were mostly mild or moderate in rotigotine subjects. Rotigotine transdermal patches releasing 2 to 3 mg/24 hr significantly reduced the severity of RLS symptoms. Treatment efficacy was maintained throughout the 6‐month double‐blind period. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Ropinirole is effective in the treatment of restless legs syndrome. TREAT RLS 2: a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological condition with significant impact on sleep and quality of life (QoL). This double-blind, randomized, 12-week, multinational study compared the efficacy and safety of ropinirole and placebo in RLS. In total, 267 outpatients with moderate-to-severe RLS were randomly assigned to ropinirole (0.25-4.0 mg/day) or placebo, 1 to 3 hours before bedtime. The primary endpoint was the change in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score at week 12. Key secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients showing significant improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale at week 12 and changes in IRLS and CGI-I scale scores at week 1. Other measures included the Medical Outcomes Study sleep scale and Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life questionnaire. Improvements were significantly greater for ropinirole than placebo for change in IRLS score at week 12 (-11.2 [SE 0.76] vs. -8.7 [0.75], respectively; adjusted treatment difference -2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI], -4.6, -0.4], P = 0.0197); all key secondary endpoints; sleep and QoL parameters. Adverse events were typical for dopamine agonists; disease augmentation, although not directly assessed, was not reported during treatment. Ropinirole improves symptoms, associated sleep disturbance, and QoL of RLS patients and is generally well tolerated.     

Randomized,placebo-controlled trial of ferric carboxymaltose in restless legs syndrome patients with iron deficiency anemia

ObjectiveIntravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has been shown to be efficacious in treating restless legs syndrome (RLS) symptoms in non-anemic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of FCM in treating RLS symptoms in patients who also had an iron deficiency anemia (IDA).MethodsThis is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Subjects with RLS and IDA were enrolled. Subjects received an infusion of either 1500 mg FCM or placebo in Phase I. The primary outcomes were a change-from-baseline at week six on the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group scale (IRLS). Phase II of the study involved long-term (52 weeks) follow-up, for those who responded to treatment in the prior phase, with the potential for further treatment if symptoms returned.ResultsWe enrolled 29 RLS patients with IDA (15 FCM and 14 placebo). At week six post-infusion, FCM compared to placebo group showed significant improvement from baseline in IRLS score (−13.47 ± 7.38 vs. 1.36 ± 3.59). Among secondary outcome variables, quality of sleep showed significant improvement from baseline in the FCM group. 61% of subjects remained off RLS medications at the Phase II, week-52 endpoint. There were no serious adverse events observed in the study.ConclusionThe study showed significant efficacy and safety of FCM 1500 mg treatment both in the short term (6 weeks) and long term (52 weeks) in RLS patients with IDA.     

Efficacy of gabapentin enacarbil in adult patients with severe primary restless legs syndrome

AimAssess efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) in adults with severe primary restless legs syndrome (RLS).MethodsWe pooled data from three 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (NCT00298623, NCT00365352, NCT01332305) across GEn 600-mg, GEn 1200-mg, and placebo treatment groups for severe primary RLS (baseline International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) total score ≥24). Co-primary end points at week 12 were mean change from baseline in IRLS total score and proportion of responders (“much”/very much” improved) on the investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression – Improvement (CGI-I) Scale. Outcomes for individual IRLS items (eg, sleep, mood, quality of life, pain, safety) were assessed.ResultsA total of 309 patients had severe primary RLS (placebo, n = 110; GEn 600 mg, n = 80; GEn 1200 mg, n = 119). GEn 600 mg and 1200 mg significantly improved least-squares mean IRLS total scores versus placebo at week 12 (placebo, −12.3; GEn 600 mg, −16.3; GEn 1200 mg, −18.0; treatment difference vs. placebo, both p <0.01). Significantly more patients with severe primary RLS treated with GEn 600 mg (64%) and 1200 mg (74%) were CGI-I responders at week 12 versus placebo (42%; p <0.01 for both GEn doses). Both GEn doses led to significant improvements in the other outcomes explored versus placebo at week 12. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were somnolence (GEn, 21–24%; placebo, 3%) and dizziness (GEn, 14–19%; placebo, 3%).ConclusionsGEn (600 mg or 1200 mg) once daily significantly improved RLS symptoms and consequences of these symptoms in severe primary RLS. The most frequent TEAEs were somnolence and dizziness.     

3,4‐Diaminopyridine is more effective than placebo in a randomized,double‐blind,cross‐over drug study in LEMS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and electrophysiological efficacy of 3,4‐diaminopyridine (DAP) in patients with Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) in a randomized, double‐blind, cross‐over drug trial. The diagnosis of LEMS was made based on the combination of fluctuating muscle weakness, diminished or absent reflexes, and more than 60% increment of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude after brief exercise or 50‐HZ stimulation on a repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) test. Evaluations were done at baseline, with placebo, and with 3,4‐DAP (up to 75–80 mg/day). Assignment of placebo or 3,4‐DAP was done in a double‐blinded manner. Measurements included subjective symptoms score, objective clinical measurements [LEMS classification, muscle strength score, quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score] and RNS test and single‐fiber electromyography (SFEMG). The differences between placebo and baseline values (placebo change) were compared with the differences between 3,4‐DAP and baseline or placebo values (DAP change). Seven patients with LEMS (QMG score >9) participated in the study. One patient had major side‐effects with 3,4‐DAP and withdrew from the study. Statistically significant efficacy was noted with DAP change (N = 13) compared with placebo change (N = 7) according to the subjective symptoms score (P = 0.01), LEMS classification (P < 0.001), muscle strength score (P < 0.006), QMG score (P = 0.02), and CMAP (P = 0.03). For long‐term treatment, 2 patients preferred 3,4‐DAP, 1 chose guanidine hydrochloride, 1 preferred pyridostigmine, and 2 chose no treatment. A randomized, double‐blind, cross‐over drug trial of 3,4‐DAP showed significant efficacy over placebo in patients with LEMS. As a long‐term treatment, however, not all patients preferred this drug. Muscle Nerve, 2009     

Clinical characteristics of restless legs syndrome in end‐stage renal failure and idiopathic RLS patients

This study was done to identify the clinical characteristics of uremic restless legs syndrome (RLS). Consecutive uremic RLS patients (n = 15) and idiopathic RLS patients (iRLS; n = 20) were evaluated. The groups were compared with respect to their clinical course, subjective symptoms [using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the International Restless Legs Syndrome Severity Scale (IRLS)], polysomnographic (PSG) variables, the results of the suggested immobilization test (SIT), and the drug doses used to treat RLS. The duration of the disorder was significantly shorter in the uremic RLS group than in the iRLS group. The PSQI and IRLS scores before treatment were higher in the uremic RLS group than in the iRLS group. The periodic leg movement index (PLM index) on PSG and the SIT index were also higher in the uremic RLS group (P < 0.001, respectively). The bromocriptine equivalent dose of dopaminergic agonists used to treat RLS was significantly higher in the uremic RLS group (P < 0.001). Uremic RLS appears to deteriorate faster and to become more severe than iRLS. Moreover, uremic RLS patients appear to have a decreased response to dopaminergic agonists. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society     

Prucalopride in the treatment of chronic constipation in patients from the Asia‐Pacific region: a randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled study

Background The study evaluated efficacy and safety of the 2 mg dose of prucalopride compared to placebo in patients with chronic constipation (CC) from the Asia‐Pacific region. Methods Randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, phase III study with 2‐week run‐in, 12‐week treatment phase, and 1‐week follow‐up. Adult patients with CC (≤2 spontaneous bowel movements per week) received 2 mg prucalopride or placebo, once‐daily, for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy measure was percentage of patients with average of ≥3 spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBMs) per week (Responders) during the 12‐week treatment. A key secondary endpoint was Responders during first 4 weeks of treatment. Other efficacy assessments were based on patient diaries, their assessments of symptoms and quality of life, and investigator’s assessment on efficacy of treatment. Safety assessments included adverse events, laboratory values, and cardiovascular events. Key Results Efficacy and safety were evaluated for 501 patients who received study drug. On the primary endpoint, prucalopride was significantly more effective than placebo with 83 (33.3%) vs 26 (10.3%) patients having a weekly average of ≥3 SCBMs during the 12‐week treatment (P < 0.001). Respective percentages were 34.5%vs 11.1% over first 4 weeks (P < 0.001). On other secondary endpoints, clinical improvement was generally larger and statistically superior (P < 0.001) in the prucalopride group. Most frequently reported adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, and headache. Conclusion & Inferences Prucalopride 2 mg given once‐daily significantly improved bowel function, associated symptoms, and satisfaction in CC over a 12‐week treatment period, and was safe and well tolerated by patients in the Asia‐Pacific region.     

Ferric carboxymaltose in patients with restless legs syndrome and nonanemic iron deficiency: A randomized trial

Background : Compromised iron status is important in restless legs syndrome pathophysiology. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of ferric carboxymaltose (single intravenous dose) versus placebo for restless legs syndrome treatment in iron‐deficient nonanemic patients. Methods : Patients with moderate to severe restless legs syndrome and serum ferritin < 75 μg/L (or serum ferritin 75‐300 μg/L and transferrin saturation < 20%) were randomized to ferric carboxymaltose (1000 mg iron) or placebo. Mean change difference between ferric carboxymaltose and placebo in International Restless Legs Syndrome Severity Scale score from baseline to week 4 was the primary end point; week 12 was a secondary end point. Results : Ferric carboxymaltose treatment (n = 59) led to nonsignificant improvement over placebo (n = 51) in International Restless Legs Syndrome Severity Scale score at week 4 (difference [95% confidence interval], ‐2.5 [‐5.93 to 1.02], P = 0.163), reaching significance by week 12 (‐4.66 [‐8.59 to ‐0.73], P = 0.021). Conclusions : In patients who responded to treatment, ferric carboxymaltose may require more time to stabilize restless legs syndrome than previously assumed. © 2017 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.     

Ropinirole in the treatment of restless legs syndrome: results from the TREAT RLS 1 study, a 12 week, randomised, placebo controlled study in 10 European countries

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with restless legs syndrome. METHODS: A 12 week, prospective, double blind, randomised comparison involving 284 patients from 10 European countries. All participants had a score of > or =15 on the international restless legs scale (IRLS). Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive either ropinirole 0.25-4.0 mg once daily or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was mean change from baseline to week 12 in total IRLS score. Global improvements (clinical global impression (CGI) scale) and improvements in sleep, health related quality of life (QoL; using generic and disease specific measures), work, and other activities were also assessed. RESULTS: 112/146 patients (76.7%) taking ropinirole and 109/138 (79.0%) taking placebo completed the study. Improvement in IRLS at week 12 with ropinirole (mean (SD) dose, 1.90 (1.13) mg/day) was greater than with placebo (mean (SE): -11.04 (0.719) v -8.03 (0.738) points; adjusted difference = -3.01 (95% confidence interval (CI), -5.03 to -0.99); p = 0.0036). More patients in the ropinirole group (53.4%) showed improvement on the CGI scale at week 12 than in the placebo group (40.9%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.7 (1.02 to 2.69); p = 0.0416). Significant differences on both IRLS and CGI scales favouring ropinirole were apparent by week 1. Ropinirole was also associated with significantly greater improvements in sleep and QoL end points. The most common adverse events were nausea and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Ropinirole improves restless legs syndrome compared with placebo, with benefits apparent by week 1. It is generally well tolerated.     

Relationship of periodic leg movements and severity of restless legs syndrome: a study in unmedicated and medicated patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of the severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS) as assessed by a subjective, patient-rated scale (International RLS Study Group Rating Scale, IRLS), and of periodic leg movements in sleep (PLMS) as an objective parameter, in two different patient populations. METHODS: Data of 200 unmedicated patients with idiopathic RLS were evaluated. Group 1 (n=100) consisted of selected patients participating in the Pergolide European Australian RLS (PEARLS) study. Group 2 (n=100) represented an outpatient RLS population investigated in a Sleep Disorders Center. Additionally, Group 1 was also evaluated after a 6 week double-blind treatment period, where 47 patients received pergolide and 53 patients placebo. RESULTS: In unmedicated patients, IRLS scores correlated with the PLMS-arousal index (r=0.22, p=0.033) but not with the PLMS index in Group 1 while no correlation was found in Group 2. The change of the IRLS score under treatment in Group 1 correlated significantly both with the change of the PLMS index (r=0.42, p<0.001) and the change of the PLMS-arousal index (r=0.38, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The IRLS adequately reflects treatment changes of PLMS indices. In unmedicated patients, the IRLS correlates with PLMS indices probably only in selected RLS populations with predefined PSG criteria and high PLM activity. SIGNIFICANCE: The IRLS is an appropriate subjective rating scale for measuring treatment effects in RLS.     

The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale and subscales in a clinical-trial setting

PATIENTS AND METHODS: To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group's rating scale (the International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS)) (V2.0), using pooled data from two matching, placebo-controlled studies of ropinirole for treating Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS). RESULTS: Pooled patient samples comprised 550 patients in the baseline (validation) sample and 439 patients in the week 12 longitudinal (responsiveness) sample. Factor analysis revealed acceptability of the IRLS total score (accounting for 40% of the variance) and that nine of the 10 IRLS items could also be assigned to two distinct subscales, the symptoms or symptoms impact subscales. The IRLS total score, symptoms and symptoms impact subscales had acceptable construct validity, internal consistency reliability (alpha=0.81, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively), and concurrent validity (r=-0.68, -0.52, -0.70, respectively, with the Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life questionnaire (RLSQoL) overall life impact score). IRLS scores differed significantly between different levels of sleep problems and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of health status (P<0.0001), indicating known groups and clinical validity, respectively. Changes in scores differed significantly among CGI 'global improvement' levels (P<0.0001), providing evidence of responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The IRLS total score, symptoms, and symptoms impact subscales are reliable, valid, and responsive in a clinical trial setting.     

Safety and efficacy of perampanel in advanced Parkinson's disease: A randomized,placebo‐controlled study

Perampanel, a novel, noncompetitive, selective AMPA‐receptor antagonist demonstrated evidence of efficacy in reducing motor symptoms in animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD). We assessed the safety and efficacy of perampanel for treatment of “wearing off” motor fluctuations in patients with PD. Patients (N = 263) were randomly assigned to once‐daily add‐on 0.5, 1, or 2 mg of perampanel or placebo. The primary objective was to determine whether there was a dose‐response relationship for efficacy among the 3 perampanel doses and placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint for each treatment was measured as the least‐squares (LS) mean change from baseline to week 12 in percent “off” time reduction during the waking day, as recorded by patient diaries. The primary efficacy analysis was a 1‐sided Williams test for dose‐response trend at the 0.025 level of significance. At week 12, dose‐response trends, as determined by the Williams test, were not statistically significant for LS mean reduction in percent “off” time during the waking day (P = 0.061, with significance defined as P ≤ 0.025). The 2 higher perampanel doses (ITT population; n = 258) produced nonsignificant reductions from baseline to week 12 in percent “off” time during the waking day versus placebo (7.59%, P= 0.421 [1 mg], 8.60%, P = 0.257 [2 mg] versus 5.05% [placebo]; significance for pairwise comparisons defined as P ≤ 0.05). There were no significant changes in dyskinesia or cognitive function in any perampanel group versus placebo. Adverse events were similar across treatment groups. Perampanel treatment was well tolerated and safe, but failed to achieve statistical significance in primary and secondary endpoints. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Efficacy of pramipexole in restless legs syndrome: a six-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study (effect-RLS study).

We evaluated the efficacy of pramipexole versus placebo in restless legs syndrome (RLS) for 6 weeks. Overall, 345 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive either placebo (n = 115) or pramipexole (n = 230) with a starting dose of 0.125 mg/day. The dose was individually optimized according to the Patient Global Impression (PGI) assessment, up to a maximum of 0.75 mg/day. The primary endpoint consisted of two assessments: the change from baseline in the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) and the proportion of patients with Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) assessments of "much/very much improved" (CGI-I responders) at week 6. Secondary endpoints included PGI and IRLS responder rates. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. At baseline, mean IRLS scores were 24.9 (placebo) and 24.7 (pramipexole), representing severely affected patients. After 6 weeks, adjusted mean reductions (+/-SE) in IRLS score were 5.7 (+/-0.9) for placebo (median dose 0.47 mg/day) and 12.3 (+/-0.6) for pramipexole (median dose 0.35 mg/day; P < 0.0001). CGI-I responder rates were 32.5% (placebo) and 62.9% (pramipexole) (P < 0.0001). For all secondary endpoints, pramipexole showed superior results. Pramipexole was well tolerated throughout the study.     

A randomized,double-blind, 6-week,dose-ranging study of pregabalin in patients with restless legs syndrome

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the dose-related efficacy and safety of pregabalin in patients with idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS).MethodsThis six-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose–response study randomized patients (N = 137) with moderate-to-severe idiopathic RLS in an equal ratio to placebo or pregabalin 50, 100, 150, 300, or 450 mg/day. The dose–response was characterized using an exponential decay model, which estimates the maximal effect (E_max) for the primary endpoint, the change in the International Restless Legs Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) total score from baseline to week 6 of treatment. Secondary outcomes included Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) responders, sleep assessments, and safety.ResultsThe separation of treatment effect between placebo and pregabalin began to emerge starting at week 1 which continued and increased through week 6 for all dose groups. The IRLS total score for pregabalin was dose dependent and well characterized for change from baseline at week 6. The model estimated 50% (ED₅₀) and 90% (ED₉₀) of the maximal effect in reducing RLS symptoms that occurred at pregabalin doses of 37.3 and 123.9 mg/day, respectively. A higher proportion of CGI-I responders was observed at the two highest doses of pregabalin (300 and 450 mg/day) versus placebo. Dizziness and somnolence were the most common adverse events and appeared to be dose-related.ConclusionsIn this 6-week phase 2b study, pregabalin reduced RLS symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe idiopathic RLS. The symptom reduction at week 6 was dose-dependent with 123.9 mg/day providing 90% efficacy. Pregabalin was safe and well tolerated across the entire dosing range.     

A double‐blind,placebo‐controlled study of prucalopride in elderly patients with chronic constipation

Background Constipation affects up to 50% of the elderly; this study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the selective 5‐HT₄ agonist prucalopride in chronically constipated elderly patients. Methods Three hundred chronic constipation patients aged ≥65 years were randomized to prucalopride (1, 2, or 4 mg once daily) or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with ≥3 spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBM) per week. Secondary endpoints included the percentage with an increase of ≥1 SCBM per week, BM frequency, constipation‐related symptoms, quality of life (QoL), safety, and tolerability. Key Results More patients achieved ≥3 SCBM per week with prucalopride than with placebo. This difference was largest and significant during the first week of 4 mg prucalopride (P ≤ 0.05). Significantly more patients in each prucalopride group achieved an increase of ≥1 SCBM per week from baseline vs placebo (e.g. 60% with 1 mg prucalopride vs 34% with placebo at week 4; P ≤ 0.05). More patients had improvement in PAC‐QOL satisfaction score of ≥1 with 1 mg prucalopride than with placebo (P ≤ 0.05); the same was true for PAC‐SYM stool symptoms (1 and 4 mg prucalopride; P ≤ 0.05). Treatment‐emergent adverse events were similar between groups: the most frequently reported with prucalopride were headache and gastrointestinal events. There were no clinically significant differences between prucalopride and placebo for vital signs, laboratory assessments, or ECG variables. Conclusions & Inferences Prucalopride, in the dose‐range tested (1–4 mg once daily), has beneficial effects on bowel movements, symptoms, and QoL, and is safe and well‐tolerated in elderly patients with chronic constipation.     

Brain functional changes during placebo lead‐in and changes in specific symptoms during pharmacotherapy for major depression

Objective: Brain functional changes during placebo lead‐in have been associated with antidepressant response in clinical trials for major depressive disorder (MDD); however, the relationship between such non‐pharmacodynamic changes in brain function and changes in specific symptoms is unknown. Method: Fifty‐eight adults with MDD completed a 1‐week single‐blind placebo lead‐in preceding 8 weeks of double‐blind randomized treatment with fluoxetine or venlafaxine (n = 30) or placebo (n = 28). Brain functional change during lead‐in was assessed using quantitative electroencephalographic (qEEG) prefrontal theta‐band cordance. Symptoms were assessed using the Symptom Checklist‐90‐Revised (SCL‐90‐R). Results: The multiple regression model examining the qEEG parameter in relation to SCL‐90‐R subscales was significant [F_(9,9) = 4.27, P = 0.021, R² = 0.81] in females, with a significant association for the interpersonal sensitivity subscale (beta coefficient = 1.94, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Prefrontal neurophysiologic change during placebo lead‐in may indicate subsequent antidepressant‐related improvement in symptoms of interpersonal sensitivity.     

Systematic evaluation of augmentation during treatment with ropinirole in restless legs syndrome (Willis‐Ekbom Disease): Results from a prospective,multicenter study over 66 weeks

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of augmentation over 66 weeks of treatment with ropinirole in patients with primary restless legs syndrome (RLS). Augmentation is the main complication of long‐term dopaminergic treatment of RLS. Despite widespread use of ropinirole in RLS, no studies have prospectively and systematically assessed the incidence of augmentation with its use. The study consisted of 26 weeks of double‐blind flexible‐dose treatment with ropinirole or placebo, followed by 40 weeks of open‐label ropinirole treatment.. Patients had no previous history of augmentation. Potential cases of augmentation were identified with the Structured Interview for the Diagnosis of Augmentation and the Augmentation Severity Rating Scale and through reporting of adverse events. Cases were blindly evaluated by an expert panel using the NIH diagnostic criteria for augmentation. Four hundred and four patients participated in the double‐blind study and 269 in the open‐label phase, with a discontinuation rate of 42%. IRLS baseline scores improved at the end of the double‐blind (DB) phase (mean ± SE) by ?15.9 ± 0.76 for ropinirole, by ?13.4 ± 0.77 for placebo (P < .05) and by ?20.4 ± 0.55 during the open‐label phase. The incidence rates of augmentation were 3.5% for ropinirole and <1% for placebo during the DB phase and 3% during the open‐label phase. Clinically significant augmentation occurred in 3%, <1%, and 2%, respectively. Discontinuation of treatment occurred in 50% of all patients (7 of 14) with augmentation. The incidence of augmentation was 3.1% higher with ropinirole than with placebo. New patients with first episodes of augmentation continued to cumulate at a stable rate over the duration of this study. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society     

A Multicenter,Placebo‐Controlled,Double‐Blind,Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety of Ocinaplon (DOV 273,547) in Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Preclinical studies demonstrated that ocinaplon, a positive allosteric modulator of GABA_A receptors, possesses anxiolytic‐like actions at doses devoid of the side effects typically associated with benzodiazepines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ocinaplon in a multicenter, double‐blind proof‐of‐concept trial of male and female outpatients who met DSM‐IV criteria for GAD with no coexisting depression, and had a baseline score of ≥20 on the Hamilton Scale for Anxiety (HAM‐A). Patients with <20% reduction in HAM‐A to placebo in a single‐blind 7‐day run‐in period were randomly assigned to treatment with ocinaplon 90 mg t.i.d. (n = 31) or placebo for 28 days (n = 29). Ocinaplon was more effective than placebo in reducing HAM‐A scores (P= 0.009). Patients assigned to ocinaplon exhibited a mean improvement of 14.2 points (SE = 2.6) on the total score of the HAM‐A scale at the conclusion of the trial, while patients assigned to placebo obtained a mean improvement of 6.3 points (SE = 2.0). A significant (P= 0.023) difference in improvement between ocinaplon and placebo was observed beginning at and continuing from 1‐week after the initiation of dosing. The proportion of patients with treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAE) was not statistically significant between ocinaplon and placebo. One serious adverse event (SAE) occurred in the ocinaplon group that was considered possibly related to study medication (icterus following transaminase elevations). The patient had preexisting medical conditions that may have contributed to this SAE. A full recovery was observed with no residual effects. The overall safety profile revealed no patterns of TEAEs, including those effects typically associated with other anxiolytic and/or benzodiazepine compounds, such as sedation. Ocinaplon appears to be a well‐tolerated and effective treatment for GAD. It produces a rapid onset of anxiolytic action absent the side effects (e.g., dizziness, sedation) typically reported following anxiolytic doses of benzodiazepines.