von Willebrand disease (VWD): evidence‐based diagnosis and management guidelines,the National Heart,Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Expert Panel report (USA)1

Summary. von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a commonly encountered inherited bleeding disorder affecting both males and females, causing mucous membrane and skin bleeding symptoms, and bleeding with surgical or other haemostatic challenges. VWD may be disproportionately symptomatic in women of child‐bearing age. It may also occur less frequently as an acquired disorder (acquired von Willebrand syndrome). VWD is caused by deficiency or dysfunction of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a plasma protein that mediates platelet haemostatic function and stabilizes blood coagulation factor VIII. The pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis and management of VWD are relatively complex, but understanding them is important for proper diagnosis and management of patients with VWD. These evidence‐based guidelines for diagnosis and management of VWD from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Expert Panel (USA) review relevant publications, summarize current understanding of VWD pathophysiology and classification, and present consensus diagnostic and management recommendations based on analysis of the literature and expert opinion. They also suggest an approach for clinical and laboratory evaluation of individuals with bleeding symptoms, history of bleeding or conditions associated with increased bleeding risk. This document summarizes needs for further research in VWF, VWD and bleeding disorders, including clinical research to obtain more objective information about bleeding symptoms, advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, and enhancement in the education and training of clinicians and scientists in bleeding and thrombotic disorders. The NHLBI Web site ( http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/vwd ) has a more detailed document, a synopsis of these recommendations, and patient education information.     

Appropriate laboratory assessment as a critical facet in the proper diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disorder.

The correct diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease or disorder (VWD) is crucial because the presenting biological activity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) determines both the haemorrhagic risk and the subsequent clinical management. A variety of laboratory assays may be employed, not necessarily restricted to assessments of VWF. Because of assay limitations and von Willebrand disease heterogeneity, no single test procedure is sufficiently 'robust' to permit the detection of all VWD variants. Classically, the test panel might include any combination of: (a) skin bleeding time, (b) von Willebrand factor antigen assay, (c) factor VIII C level, (d) assessment of 'functional' von Willebrand factor (collagen-binding activity or ristocetin co-factor assay), (e) ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation, and (f) multimer analysis. There have also been many new diagnostic developments that have begun to influence the diagnostic process. These include the automation of existing assay procedures, new automated platelet function analyzers such as the PFA-100, and specific von Willebrand factor-factor VIII-binding assays. This chapter focuses on the recommended laboratory process for the investigation of VWD. The selection of an appropriate combination test panel and testing sequence is crucial for the proper diagnosis and classification of congenital von Willebrand disease.     

Diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease: a review of the differential utility of various functional von Willebrand factor assays

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered to be the most common inherited bleeding disorder. VWD is diagnosed following a clinical and physical review, with personal and familial evidence of (primarily mucocutaneous) bleeding, and confirmed by laboratory testing. The latter typically entails initial plasma testing of factor VIII coagulant, von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein ('antigen') and VWF function which has classically been assessed using the ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assay. More recent attention has focussed on other functional VWF assays, such as collagen binding and so-called 'VWF activity' assays, as possible replacements to the VWF:RCo, or as supplementary tests of VWF 'function'. Additional laboratory testing can comprise a battery of confirmatory and VWD-type assisting assays, including VWF:multimer and von Willebrand factor VIII binding. This review aims to update knowledge of current VWD diagnostics with a particular emphasis on 'functional' VWF assays.     

Platelet-type von Willebrand disease: a rare, often misdiagnosed and underdiagnosed bleeding disorder

Platelet-type von Willebrand disease (PT-VWD) is an autosomal dominant rare bleeding disorder characterized by hyperresponsive platelets. This inherent platelet function defect is due to a gain-of-function mutation within the GP1BA gene coding for the platelet surface glycoprotein Ib alpha protein, the receptor for the adhesive protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). The defect results in excessive and unnecessary platelet-VWF interaction with subsequent removal of the hemostatically efficient high molecular weight VWF as well as platelets from the circulation, leading to thrombocytopenia and bleeding diathesis. Patients with PT-VWD present with mild to moderate mucocutaneous bleeding, which becomes more pronounced during pregnancy and following aspirin ingestion or drugs that have antiplatelet activity. Laboratory testing shows low VWF:ristocetin cofactor and low or normal VWF:antigen and characteristically an enhanced ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination (RIPA). These laboratory features are also indicators of the closely similar and more common bleeding disorder type 2B VWD. Simplified RIPA mixing assays, cryoprecipitate challenge, and flow cytometry can differentiate between the two disorders. However, the gold standard is to identify mutations within the VWF gene (indicating type 2B VWD) or the platelet GP1BA gene (confirming PT-VWD). Treatment is based on making a correct diagnosis of PT-VWD where platelet concentrates instead of VWF/factor VIII preparations should be administered. A recent fairly large retrospective/prospective registry-based international study showed that PT-VWD is very rare, likely to be misdiagnosed as type 2B VWD or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, and represents 15% of type 2B VWD diagnoses.     

Advances in the diagnosis and management of type 1 von Willebrand disease

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an autosomally inherited bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency and/or abnormality of von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWF is a multimeric adhesive protein that plays an important role in primary hemostasis by promoting platelet adhesion to the subendothelium at sites of vascular injury and platelet-platelet interactions at high-shear rate conditions. Furthermore, VWF is the carrier of factor VIII, thus indirectly contributing to the coagulation process. Most cases have a partial quantitative deficiency of VWF (type 1 VWD) with variable bleeding tendency, whereas qualitative variants (type 2 VWD), due to a dysfunctional VWF, are clinically more homogeneous and account for approximately 20-30% of cases. Type 3 VWD is rare and these patients have moderate-to-severe bleeding diathesis, display a recessive pattern of inheritance and virtual absence of VWF. The diagnosis of VWD may be difficult, especially in type 1 disease, since the laboratory phenotype of the disorder is very heterogeneous and confounded by the influence on VWF levels by factors outside the VWF gene (e.g., blood group). An array of tests are usually required to characterize the several types of the disorder in order to predict the best treatment modality. Desmopressin is the treatment of choice for most patients with type 1 VWD because it corrects the the dual defects of hemostasis, that is, abnormal coagulation expressed by low levels of factor VIII and abnormal platelet adhesion expressed by the reduction of VWF.     

Von Willebrand Disease Lab Diagnosis

The hemorrhagic diseases are characterized by bleeding which can vary considerably according to their severity. The von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most frequent hereditary hemorrhagic disease and the prevalence of clinically significant disease is probably closer to 1:1000, being an extremely heterogeneous and complex disorder that is related to the deficiency in concentration, structure or function of von Willebrand factor (VWF). The VWD is divided into type 1, with partial deficiency of the VWF, type 2, with qualitative defects in the molecule with four subdivisions, and type 3, with very low or undetectable levels of plasma and platelet VWF and ristocetin cofactor activity. The laboratory diagnosis of VWD is complex. Specific tests that assess the functionality and concentrations of the VWF and FVIII are needed. The routine tests are the bleeding time, the activated partial thromboplastin time and the platelet count, however, singly, they may not suggest the diagnosis of VWD, requiring further specific tests, such as VWF function evaluation through its ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo), VWF protein concentration immunoassay (VWF:Ag), the factor VIII coagulation assay (FVIII:C), VWF binding to immobilized collagen (VWF:CB), ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA), VWF multimers patterns, factor VIII binding of immobilized VWF (VWF:FVIIIB), among others. From the moment the diagnosis is confirmed, the appropriate treatment for each patient is sought, with the purpose of increasing plasma concentrations of the deficient protein, both in bleeding episodes, as for invasive procedures. Although diagnosis facilitates treatment other approach in the present scenario is prenatal diagnosis which, is the need of the hour.     

Platelet von Willebrand factor determination does not improve the diagnosis of patients with suspected Type 1 von Willebrand disease

Summary.  Establishing a laboratory diagnosis of a bleeding disorder can be challenging for some patients who present with mucocutaneous bleeding symptoms. A common clinical scenario is an older patient with a prior diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) or a family history of VWD, who now has von Willebrand factor (VWF) values repeatedly within the normal range. Plasma VWF antigen levels have been shown to increase with age. Whether platelet VWF increases with age is unknown. We hypothesized that platelet VWF does not increase with age and low platelet VWF levels, despite normal plasma levels, could be a reason for continued bleeding symptoms in some patients. Therefore, we compared the platelet and plasma VWF antigen and activity as well as the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100^® closure times in 35 patients with a history of mucocutaneous bleeding symptoms and consistently normal levels of VWF antigen and activity, despite a prior history of a VWD diagnosis and/or a positive family history of VWD. Overall in our patients (bleeders), the platelet VWF values correlated with the plasma values and only three patients had reduced platelet VWF. In the bleeding group, the PFA-100^® results showed an inverse correlation with plasma and platelet values, which was stronger for the plasma values. Therefore, platelet VWF determination was not helpful in the diagnosis of suspected mild type 1 VWD.     

Type 1 von Willebrand disease - a clinical retrospective study of the diagnosis, the influence of the ABO blood group and the role of the bleeding history

This clinical retrospective study investigated the difficulties in diagnosing type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD). A total of 246 patients previously diagnosed with type 1 VWD were reclassified into 'possible' type 1 VWD (patients with low levels of VWF adjusted for the blood group and either a significant bleeding history or family history) and 'definite' type 1 VWD, requiring low levels of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a bleeding history and inheritance. On reclassification, only 144/246 (59%) patients had low VWF levels adjusted for blood group, 88/246 (36%) patients met all the criteria for 'definite' type 1 VWD and 51/246 (21%) patients were 'possible' type 1 VWD. A significant proportion of patients, 102/246 (42%), remained an indeterminate group with blood type O, VWF levels between 35 and 50 U/dl and personal and/or family bleeding history. This subgroup might require reclassification as 'not VWD'. However, a similar bleeding tendency was found in two matched groups of patients of blood groups O and non-O and VWF levels between 35 and 50 U/dl. These results suggest that the use of ABO adjusted ranges for VWF levels might not be essential for diagnosis, because bleeding symptoms may depend on the VWF level regardless of the ABO type. Of the diagnostic criteria, the bleeding history was of prime importance in the clinical decision to diagnose and treat type 1 VWD. These observations could help in the reconsideration of how the criteria for diagnosing type 1 VWD could be adjusted in order to maximize their clinical relevance.     

Diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease in Australia

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and arises from deficiencies and/or defects in the plasma protein Von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD is classified into six different types, with type 1 identifying a (partial) quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 defining a (virtual) total deficiency of VWF, and type 2 identifying four separate types (2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N) characterized by qualitative defects. The classification is based on phenotypic assays including factor VIII coagulant, VWF antigen, and VWF activity, primarily by ristocetin cofactor and collagen binding, as supplemented by additional testing. In Australia, >30 pathology-based laboratories perform VWD testing, and tests and test panels reflect a wide variety of practice. In our own referral laboratory, diagnosis is a staged process reflecting a combination of clinical and laboratory findings with a large panel of tests. We also use data from desmopressin trials to assist in VWD type assignment. The current report presents an overview of the VWD diagnostic process as applied within Australia, includes summary data from the Australian Bleeding Disorders Registry, and provides specific details of the diagnostic and management practice undertaken in our reference laboratory, which also maintains a local bleeding disorders database. This database currently contains 4070 entries, including 1832 suspected or confirmed cases of VWD. Excluding 311 as yet unclassified cases, 1254 cases (82.4%) would define (potential) quantitative deficiencies of VWF ("low VWF" or type 1 VWD), 241 (15.8%) qualitative defects (type 2 VWD), and 23 (1.5%) type 3 VWD. Most of the quantitative defects reflect only mild loss of VWF, and <15% of total cases would be identified to have VWF levels <35 U/dL. Most cases of type 2 remain unclassified (34.9%) because available data are limited. Type 2A and 2M VWD represent the most common qualitative defects, representing 22.8% and 22.2% of defined type 2 VWD cases. Type 2B and 2N reflect 8.3% and 12.9%, respectively, of type 2 VWD cases.     

Characterization of recessive severe type 1 and 3 von Willebrand Disease (VWD), asymptomatic heterozygous carriers versus bloodgroup O-related von Willebrand factor deficiency, and dominant type 1 VWD.

Recessive type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by homozygosity or double heterozygosity for two non-sense mutations (null alleles). Type 3 VWD is easy to diagnose by the combination of a strongly prolonged bleeding time (BT), absence of ristocetine-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA), absence of von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein, and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) due to factor VIII:coagulant (FVIII:C) deficiency. VWD type 3 is associated with a pronounced tendency to mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal bleedings since early childhood. Carriers of one null allele are usually asymptomatic at VWF levels of 50% of normal. Recessive severe type 1 VWD is caused by homozygosity or double heterozygosity for a missense mutation. Recessive type 1 VWD differs from type 3 VWD by the presence of detectable von Willebrand factor: antigen VWF:Ag and FVIII:C levels between 0.09 and 0.40 U/mL. Patients with recessive type 1 VWD show an abnormal VWF multimeric pattern in plasma and/or platelets consistent with severe type 2 VWD. Carriers of a missense mutation may have mild bleeding and mild VWF deficiency and can be diagnosed by a double VWF peak on cross immunoelectrophoresis (CIE). There will be cases of mild and moderate recessive type 1 VWD due to double heterozygosity of two missense mutations, or with the combination of one missense mutation with a non-sense or bloodgroup O. Mild deficiency of VWF in the range of 0.20 to 0.60 U/mL, with normal ratios of von Willebrand factor: ristocetine cofactor/antigen VWF:RCo/Ag and VWF:collagen binding/antigen (VWF:CB/Ag), normal VWF multimers, and a completely normal response to desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) with VWF level rising from below to above 1.00 U/mL are very likely cases of so-called pseudo-VWF deficiency in individuals with normal VWF protein and gene. Autosomal dominant type 1 VWD variants are in fact type 2 variants caused by a heterozygous missense mutation in the VWF gene that produces a mutant VWF protein that has a dominant effect on normal VWF protein produced by the normal VWF allele with regard to the synthesis, processing, storage, secretion, and/or proteolysis of VWF in endothelial cells. A DDAVP challenge test clearly differentiates between dominant type 1 VWD phenotype and dominant type 2 M VWD.     

Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of von Willebrand disease in India

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) in all developing countries including India is considered a rare coagulation disorder, contrary to many reports from Western countries. Prevalence data based on hospital referrals identifies type 3 VWD as the most common subtype followed by type 1 and type 2. Approximately 60 to 70% cases of type 3 VWD are reportedly born of consanguineous marriages. The discriminatory diagnostic tests mainly include assays for factor (F)VIII:C and ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination and Von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen either by immunoelectrophoresis or by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. VWD-type assisting tests like VWF collagen binding, VWF ristocetin cofactor assay, VWF-FVIII binding assay, and multimer analysis are occasionally used but not routinely applied in many laboratories. Among women, menorrhagia is an important presenting manifestation. Except for a handful of centers mainly in metropolitan cities, most laboratories in the remote parts of the country have no facilities for VWD-related investigations, resulting in occasional misdiagnoses of VWD as hemophilia A. Genetic diagnosis is being offered in two or three centers using the indirect linkage method in type 3 VWD, and efforts are continuing to implementing a direct mutation detection technique for routine practice in a few laboratories. Depending on the subtype or the severity of VWD, desmopressin, cryoprecipitate, fresh-frozen plasma, and factor VIII/VWF concentrates are used for management. Antifibrinolytic agents like epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are widely used as an adjuvant therapy. In women with menorrhagia, oral contraceptives as a supplementary treatment are also being widely advocated to reduce bleeding. Products like danazol, ethenyl estradiol, thalidomide, and atorvastatin have been used in individual patients; acquired VWD associated with hypothyroidism has been managed successfully with thyroid hormone treatment. Both minor and major surgical procedures are performed in a few centers with judicious use of cryoprecipitate or FVIII concentrate containing VWF along with other supplementary therapeutic products to achieve adequate hemostasis. Awareness about the disease, establishment of the comprehensive coagulation laboratory, and treatment centers will be successful in increasing diagnosis of VWD and consequently better management of affected patients. This is likely to tilt the ratios of different VWD types, and VWD is likely to emerge as the most common of all coagulation disorders in the near future.     

Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand''s disorder: quality and diagnostic improvements driven by peer review in a multilaboratory test process

Regular multilaboratory surveys of laboratories derived primarily from Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia have been conducted over the past 7 years to evaluate testing proficiency in the diagnosis of von Willebrand's disorder (VWD) and to assess changes to test practice. Participating laboratories (currently 45) are asked to perform their usual panel of tests for VWD, and then to self-interpret test results as to the likelihood (or not) of VWD, as well as to the potential subtype identified. Samples provided in the past two survey distributions (both conducted in 2003) were as follows. Survey part A/distribution 1: Normal donor plasma, plasma with borderline normal/reduced levels of VWF (x2) and plasma from an individual with type 2 A VWD. Survey part B/distribution 2 (family VWD study): Plasma from a father, mother and son with borderline normal/reduced von Willebrand factor (VWF), and a daughter with type 3 VWD. In line with previously published survey results, the interassay and within method coefficients of variation (CV) were similar for all assays (around 15-25%), although tending to be slightly higher for VWF:RCo and VWF:CB than VWF:Ag and FVIII:C. Most laboratories reported test values consistent with expected findings, and made correct interpretations or predictions regarding the nature of the samples, although discrepant assay results or interpretations are still seen in approximately 5-10% of responses (typically from laboratories using a more limited test panel or not performing the VWF:CB). Overall, problems with the non-identification of functional VWF discordance in type 2 VWD, the misidentification of functional VWF discordance in type 1 VWD, and difficulties in discriminating types 1 and 3 VWD appear to predominate. In comparison with previous surveys, performance of electro-immuno diffusion (EID) (or Laurel gel) procedures has now ceased, and a reduction in VWF:RCo and VWF:Multimer testing and an increase in latex immunoassay (LIA) testing is sustained. We conclude that laboratories are generally proficient in tests for VWD, and that diagnostic error rates are reduced when test panels are more comprehensive and include the VWF:CB.     

von Willebrand disease: a clinical and laboratory study of sixty-five patients

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the commonest inherited bleeding disorder, yet it has not been well recognized in Southeast Asia. The aim of this prospective study was to report our experience of VWD diagnosis and to establish the clinical presentations of VWD in Taiwan. From October 2003 to April 2010, 863 patients with suspicion of having an inherited bleeding disorder underwent VWD screening tests. Those with positive tests were selected for further clinical and laboratory evaluation. A nested gender- and age-matched control cohort underwent similar investigation for comparison. VWD was diagnosed by comprehensive laboratory tests including factor VIII clotting activity, von Willebrand factor antigen assay, VWF:ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) and platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 closure times. VWF multimer analysis was performed by western blot for disease subtype identification. Sixty-five (7.5%) patients from 55 unrelated families were discovered to have VWD. Their median age was 27 years with a range of 4 to 69 years. The most common and specific bleeding symptom in male and female patients was bleeding after dental extraction and menorrhagia, respectively, as compared with control subjects. PFA-100 epinephrine closure time was the most sensitive laboratory test for VWD diagnosis with a sensitivity of 85%, followed by VWF:RCo assay (73%). Among 49 patients with VWF multimer analysis, 37(75.5%) were revealed to have type 1 VWD. Our study demonstrates that VWD and its clinical manifestations and subtypes in Taiwan are similar to those in the West and represents the first report of its kind in a Southeast Asian population.     

Platelet-type von Willebrand disease and type 2B von Willebrand disease: a story of nonidentical twins when two different genetic abnormalities evolve into similar phenotypes

Platelet-type von Willebrand disease (PT-VWD, or pseudo-VWD) and type 2B VWD share a common bleeding phenotype with different etiologies. Both PT-VWD and type 2B VWD represent an enhanced binding between the plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) to its platelet ligand, glycoprotein Ib alpha ( GP1BA). However, type 2B VWD results from a functionally abnormal VWF molecule, whereas PT-VWD is caused by hyperresponsive platelets due to defects in the platelet GP1BA gene. The laboratory discrimination between the two disorders can be a challenge because simple phenotypic testing will not differentially identify the disorders, and the more complex testing approaches are often poorly applied. Definitive diagnosis is critical for treatment decisions and can be most definitively achieved by identifying the gene defect at either the VWF or GP1BA loci. A systematic international molecular genetic study would be helpful to address the question of whether PT-VWD is being misdiagnosed as type 2B VWD. Such a study can be facilitated by an international online database/disease registry to enhance international awareness about this otherwise long-recognized diagnostic dilemma.     

Mild forms of von Willebrand disease: diagnosis and management

Diagnosis of mild forms of type 1 and 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) may be difficult, especially when the levels of von Willebrand factor (VWF) activities measured as ristocetin cofactor are close to normal (30-60 U/dL) because the laboratory phenotype is highly heterogeneous and confounded by factors outside the VWF gene (eg, blood group) that may influence VWF levels. An array of tests is often required to characterize the VWD types of the disorder and establish the best treatment modality, but laboratory data should always be interpreted in the presence of personal and family bleeding history. The aim of treatment is to correct the dual defect of hemostasis (ie, abnormal coagulation expressed by low levels of factor VIII:C and abnormal platelet adhesion expressed by the prolonged bleeding time). Desmopressin (1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin; DDAVP) is the treatment of choice for the mild forms of type 1 and 2 VWD because it often corrects the factor VIII/VWF levels and the prolonged bleeding time in most patients, but no prospective studies on clinical effects of DDAVP are available. In type 1 and type 2 VWD unresponsive to DDAVP, plasma virally inactivated concentrates containing VWF and factor VIII are the mainstay of treatment.     

Pregnancy in type 2B VWD: a case series

Type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a rare, inherited bleeding disorder resulting from a qualitative defect in von Willebrand factor (VWF). There is very little published information on how to quantify bleeding risk and manage haemostasis in type 2B VWD patients during pregnancy. This article presents the changes in VWF parameters and details of patient management and delivery outcomes for four pregnancies in three women with two different mutations causing type 2B VWD. We report an unexpected rise in the VWF:Ag at 37 weeks gestation in two sisters with R1306W associated with significant thrombocytopenia. These patients were supported with platelet transfusions as well as intermediate purity VWF-FVIII plasma concentrates during the peri- and postpartum periods. No thrombocytopenia was observed in our third case with a mutation encoding an R1308C substitution; haemostatic support was with intermediate purity VWF-FVIII plasma concentrates alone. No adverse bleeding events occurred and in all cases a live healthy infant was delivered. One patient was readmitted post partum with bleeding symptoms due to retained placenta; no further haemostatic support was given at this time. This case series is the first to detail the progression of laboratory parameters, management and outcomes of pregnancy in patients with type 2B VWD. The cases illustrate some of the challenges posed by the increased production of a VWF variant with a gain-of-function effect. The rapid coagulation changes observed in this series illustrate the need for continual monitoring of VWF parameters and platelet count throughout pregnancy in women with type 2B VWD.     

Determinants of bleeding severity in von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is one of the most common bleeding disorders. It is caused by abnormalities in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein, and is characterized by incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity. VWF levels vary widely in the population. The best-characterized human genetic modifier of VWF is the ABO blood group. Patients with VWD show considerable variation in bleeding tendency even within the same family, independently of VWF levels. It is possible that several modifier genes influence the phenotype. Variants of genes that encode for platelet receptors as well as those that encode for clotting factor levels have been proposed as modifiers. It is hoped that new clinical-genetic studies will shed light on these issues and help practitioners to determine the population at risk for bleeding.     

Evaluation of primary haemostasis in people with neurofibromatosis type 1

Assessment of haemostasis in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) is essentially lacking, despite case reports of an association with von Willebrand disorder (VWD) and reported excessive bleeding post-surgery. We assessed routine blood haematology, routine coagulation parameters [prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT) and fibrinogen], coagulation factors II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI and XII, von Willebrand (VWF) factor antigen and activity, and platelet function [using the platelet function analyser (PFA-100)] in a group of individuals with NF-1 (n = 30). Their perceived haemorrhagic bleeding risk was also graded by means of a structured clinical assessment and physical examination. Routine blood assessments including platelet counts were generally normal, as were the routine coagulation tests PT, TT and fibrinogen, and most coagulation factors. Elevated APTTs were detected in 11 individuals, reduced factor XII levels in three, reduced VWF levels in four, and elevated PFA closure times (CTs) in 13. Laboratory results correlated with each other in some but not all cases. For example, elevated APTTs were identified in two of three individuals with a reduced factor XII level and prolonged CTs were identified in three individuals who also showed reduced aggregation responses in classical platelet function studies. Moreover, all individuals with VWF results below the normal reference range showed elevated CTs with both PFA test cartridges, and those with VWF results identified as borderline normal (i.e. 50-65%) also showed elevated CTs with both PFA test cartridges in three of five cases. The relationship between VWF and CTs was also identified by linear regression analysis (P-values of <0.05, for all comparisons). However, as clinically perceived bleeding risk did not appear to be correlated with laboratory test results in most cases, blanket screening of NF-1 individuals for evaluation of laboratory haemostasis may not be warranted.     

Presentation and diagnosis of patients with type 3 von Willebrand disease in resources-limited laboratory

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a bleeding disorder that results from decreased von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity <0.30 iu/mL. Therefore, the diagnosis of type 3 VWD in patients with bleeding requires finding a VWF:Ag and/or VWF:platelet ristocetin cofactor (RiCof) <0.03 iu/mL, no further testing is usually necessary. This is a cohort study that included 64 patients with type 3 VWD who were presented and diagnosed at the National Center of Hematology (NCH) from October 2014 to October 2016. In this study the sensitivity of VWF:Ag is only 78%, the sensitivity of VWF:RiCof is 92% of diagnosed cases. From our results it can be concluded that patients with type 3 VWD are usually presented with moderate/severe mucocutaneous bleeding that is associated with prolonged bleeding time test of >10 min and a family history of similar type of bleeding. This fact was frequently utilized to provisionally diagnose several members of the same family, forming a cohort of patients that is larger than the number of objectively-diagnosed patients included in this study, when they cannot afford to be all tested with VWF:Ag/VWF:RiCof.     

Laboratory diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease in Turkey: Izmir experience

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by a deficiency or dysfunction of Von Willebrand factor (VWF). The pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis, and management of VWD are relatively complex, but their understanding is important for proper diagnosis and management of patients with VWD. There are inherent difficulties in both the identification and classification of VWD because of clinical uncertainty and the limitations in the test processes and test panels typically used by laboratories. The most common test panel employed by laboratories, particularly in the geographic regions covered by the mutational studies, would comprise factor VIII coagulant (FVIII:C), VWF protein (antigen; VWF:Ag), and ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). In our center, use of a desmopressin challenge with our core four-test panel (i.e., VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, FVIII:C, and PFA-100) is expected to further assist laboratory diagnosis of VWD in Turkey. Molecular genetics is a rather new approach for Turkey, with gene analyses related to VWD being initiated in one center and the results used for confirmation of diagnosis in limited cases.