Liver Transplantation Using Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Single Center

There is a lack of universally accepted clinical parameters to guide the utilization of donation after cardiac death (DCD) donor livers and it is unclear as to which patients would benefit most from these organs. We reviewed our experience in 141 patients who underwent liver transplantation using DCD allografts from 1993 to 2007. Patient outcomes were analyzed in comparison to a matched cohort of 282 patients who received livers from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. Patient survival was similar, but 1-, 5- and 10-year graft survival was significantly lower in DCD (69%, 56%, 44%) versus DBD (82%, 73%, 63%) subjects (p < 0.0001). Primary nonfunction and biliary complications were more common in DCD patients, accounting for 67% of early graft failures. A donor warm ischemia time >20 min, cold ischemia time >8 h and donor age >60 were associated with poorer DCD outcomes. There was a lack of survival benefit in DCD livers utilized in patients with model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) ≤30 or those not on organ-perfusion support, as graft survival was significantly lower compared to DBD patients. However, DCD and DBD subjects transplanted with MELD >30 or on organ-perfusion support had similar graft survival, suggesting a potentially greater benefit of DCD livers in critically ill patients.     

Regional differences in deceased donor liver transplantation and their implications for organ utilization and allocation

Hayashi PH, Axelrod DA, Galanko J, Salvalaggio PR, Schnitzler M. Regional differences in deceased donor liver transplantation and their implications for organ utilization and allocation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 156–163. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: We examined the UNOS database from 7/15/00‐7/17/05 for Regional deceased donor liver utilization. For each region, we performed logistic regression and derived odds ratios (OR) for donor characteristics associated with livers being transplanted outside of the region or not transplanted at all. Regions with smallest and least significant OR were considered aggressive users of suboptimal organs. We estimated how many untransplanted livers from less aggressive regions might be used by more aggressive regions. Only Region 9 was significantly more aggressive than others (median OR: 6 vs. 16; p < 0.01; median OR size: 1.4 vs. 3.6; p < 0.01). Region 9 transplanted at higher median Model for End‐stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (20.4 [6–73] vs. 18.3 [6–70], p < 0.01), but had the lowest one‐ and five‐yr graft survival (p < 0.01). Of 30 474 livers, 5056 were not transplanted, of which 3690 were procured outside Region 9 but met Region 9 use criteria. Of these, 1488 and 1807 livers had donor risk indices ≤ 2, for hypothetical 12 and 8 h cold ischemia time (CIT), respectively. Regional differences in liver utilization are profound. Region 9 is significantly more aggressive. At the most, 297–361 organs per year may have been used under Region 9’s use criteria but overall graft survival may have declined.     

Factors affecting graft survival after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors is an increasingly common approach for expansion of the donor organ supply. However, transplantation with DCD livers results in inferior graft survival. In this study, we examined donor and recipient characteristics that are associated with poor allograft outcomes and present a set of criteria that permit allograft survival that is comparable to that of donation after brain death (DBD) grafts in both low- and high-risk recipients. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Liver Transplantation Registry between January 1996 and March 2006 was investigated. Adult DCD liver transplants (n = 874) were included. RESULTS: A DCD risk index was developed using the statistically significant factors from a multivariate Cox model: history of previous transplantation, life support status at transplantation, donor age, donor warm ischemia time (DWIT), and cold ischemia time (CIT). Favorable DCD donor criteria were donor age < or =45 years, DWIT < or =15 min, and CIT < or =10 hr. Four risk groups were developed based upon index scores that showed different graft survival. Graft survival of the favorable DCD group (84.9% at 1 year, 75.2% at 3 years, and 69.4% at 5 years) was comparable to that for DBD liver transplantation irrespective of recipient condition. Increasing donor age was more highly predictive of poor outcomes in DCD compared to DBD, especially in recipients in poor preoperative condition. CONCLUSIONS: DCD livers from young donors with short DWIT and CIT should be given greater consideration in order to expand the number of available donor organs.     

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes with the Use of Kidneys and Livers Donated after Cardiac Death

The shortage of deceased donor kidneys and livers for transplantation has prompted the use of organs from donors deceased after cardiac death (DCD). We used the UNOS database to examine patient and graft survival following transplantation of DCD organs compared to those following grafts from donors deceased after brain death (DBD; for livers, grafts from donors < 60 years old were labeled '< 60 yrs'). Of 44035 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, 1177 (3%) received a DCD kidney. There was no difference in patient or graft survival at 5 years (DCD vs. DBD: 81.3% vs. 80.8% and 66.9% vs. 66.5%; p = 0.70 and p = 0.52 respectively). Of 24688-deceased donor liver transplant recipients, 345 (1.4%) were from DCD donors and 20289 (82%) were from '< 60 yrs' DBD donors. Three-year patient and graft survival were inferior in the DCD group (DCD vs. '< 60 yrs' DBD: 77% vs. 80% and 65% vs. 75%; p = 0.016 and p < 0.0001 respectively) but were comparable to current alternatives, '>/= 60 yrs' DBD livers (donor age >/= 60) and split livers. DCD livers are a reasonable option when death is imminent. Our study demonstrates good outcomes using DCD kidneys and livers and encourages their use.     

In situ normothermic perfusion of livers in controlled circulatory death donation may prevent ischemic cholangiopathy and improve graft survival

Livers from controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors suffer a higher incidence of nonfunction, poor function, and ischemic cholangiopathy. In situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) restores a blood supply to the abdominal organs after death using an extracorporeal circulation for a limited period before organ recovery. We undertook a retrospective analysis to evaluate whether NRP was associated with improved outcomes of livers from DCD donors. NRP was performed on 70 DCD donors from whom 43 livers were transplanted. These were compared with 187 non‐NRP DCD donor livers transplanted at the same two UK centers in the same period. The use of NRP was associated with a reduction in early allograft dysfunction (12% for NRP vs. 32% for non‐NRP livers, P = .0076), 30‐day graft loss (2% NRP livers vs. 12% non‐NRP livers, P = .0559), freedom from ischemic cholangiopathy (0% vs. 27% for non‐NRP livers, P < .0001), and fewer anastomotic strictures (7% vs. 27% non‐NRP, P = .0041). After adjusting for other factors in a multivariable analysis, NRP remained significantly associated with freedom from ischemic cholangiopathy (P < .0001). These data suggest that NRP during organ recovery from DCD donors leads to superior liver outcomes compared to conventional organ recovery.     

Risk Factors for Graft Survival After Liver Transplantation from Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: An Analysis of OPTN/UNOS Data

Due to increasing use of allografts from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors, we evaluated DCD liver transplants and impact of recipient and donor factors on graft survival. Liver transplants from DCD donors reported to UNOS were analyzed against donation after brain death (DBD) donor liver transplants performed between 1996 and 2003. We defined a recipient cumulative relative risk (RCRR) using significant risk factors identified from a Cox regression analysis: age; medical condition at transplantation; regraft status; dialysis received and serum creatinine. Graft survival from DCD donors (71% at 1 year and 60% at 3 years) were significantly inferior to DBD donors (80% at 1 year and 72% at 3 years, p < 0.001). Low-risk recipients (RCRR < or = 1.5) with low-risk DCD livers (DWIT < 30 min and CIT < 10 h, n = 226) achieved graft survival rates (81% and 67% at 1 and 3 years, respectively) not significantly different from recipients with DBD allografts (80% and 72% at 1 and 3 years, respectively, log-rank p = 0.23). Liver allografts from DCD donors may be used to increase the cadaveric donor pool, with favorable graft survival rates achieved when low-risk grafts are transplanted in a low-risk setting. Whether transplantation of these organs in low-risk recipients provides a survival benefit compared to the waiting list is unknown.     

Extracorporeal support for organ donation after cardiac death effectively expands the donor pool

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the effect on short-term outcomes of normothermic, extracorporeal perfusion (ECMO) for donation of abdominal organs for transplantation after cardiac death (DCD). Study parameters included increase in number of donors and organs, types of organs procured, and viability of kidneys transplanted. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical record data for all patients enrolled in our ECMO-supported DCD donor protocol between 10/1/2000 to 2/01/2004. We also reviewed the records for all patients undergoing organ donation after brain-death (DBD) during the study period at our institution. Recipient data were obtained and analyzed for all kidneys procured from both groups. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled in our DCD protocol and underwent attempted organ donation. Fifteen patients completed the protocol; 3 maintained cardiac function throughout the prescribed 60 minutes after withdrawal of life support, and two patients' organs were deemed unsuitable for transplantation. Fourteen (70%) of the DCD donor patients originated on the trauma service and six (30%) were from other clinical services. The DCD program increased the potential donor pool by 33% (61 versus 81 patients) and the number of kidneys transplanted by 24% (100 versus 124). A total of 24 kidney, 5 liver, and 1 pancreas transplants were performed with these organs. Two of 24 (8.3%) DCD kidneys had delayed graft function. There were no perioperative rejection episodes or deaths. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a DCD protocol using extracorporeal perfusion increased the potential organ donor pool at our institution by 33%. This was accomplished without short term adverse effect on organ function compared with kidneys transplanted from DBD donors.     

Kidney damage during organ recovery in donation after circulatory death donors: data from UK National Transplant Database

During the last 10 years, kidneys recovered/transplanted from donors after circulatory death (DCD) have significantly increased. To optimize their use, there has been an urgent need to minimize both warm and cold ischemia, which often necessitates more rapid removal. To compare the rates of kidney injury during procurement from DCD and donors after brain death (DBD) organ donors. A total of 13 260 kidney procurements were performed in the United Kingdom over a 10-year period (2000-2010). Injuries occurred in 903 procedures (7.1%). Twelve thousand three hundred seventy-two (93.3%) kidneys were recovered from DBD donors and 888 (6.7%) from DCD donors. The rates of kidney injury were significantly higher when recovered from DCD donors (11.4% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Capsular, ureteric and vascular injuries were all significantly more frequent (p = 0.002, p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Discard because of injury was more common after DCD donation (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated procurement injuries were significantly associated with DCD donors (p = 0.035) and increased donor age (<0.001) and donor body mass index (BMI; 0.001), donor male gender (p = 0.001) and no liver donation (0.009). We conclude that procurement from DCD donors leads to higher rates of injury to the kidney and are more likely to be discarded.     

Donation after cardiac death as a strategy to increase deceased donor liver availability

OBJECTIVE: This study examines donation after cardiac death (DCD) practices and outcomes in liver transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Livers procured from DCD donors have recently been used to increase the number of deceased donors and bridge the gap between limited organ supply and the pool of waiting list candidates. Comprehensive evaluation of this practice and its outcomes has not been previously reported. METHODS: A national cohort of all DCD and donation after brain-death (DBD) liver transplants between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2004 was identified in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Time to graft failure (including death) was modeled by Cox regression, adjusted for relevant donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: DCD livers were used for 472 (2%) of 24,070 transplants. Annual DCD liver activity increased from 39 in 2000 to 176 in 2004. The adjusted relative risk of DCD graft failure was 85% higher than for DBD grafts (relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-2.26; P < 0.001), corresponding to 3-month, 1-year, and 3-year graft survival rates of 83.0%, 70.1%, and 60.5%, respectively (vs. 89.2%, 83.0%, and 75.0% for DBD recipients). There was no significant association between transplant program DCD liver transplant volume and graft outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The annual number of DCD livers used for transplant has increased rapidly. However, DCD livers are associated with a significantly increased risk of graft failure unrelated to modifiable donor or recipient factors. Appropriate recipients for DCD livers have not been fully characterized and recipient informed consent should be obtained before use of these organs.     

Livers transplanted from donors after cardiac death occurring in the ICU or the operating room have excellent outcomes

BACKGROUND: Increasing donor hospital cooperation with donation after cardiac death (DCD) requires the organ procurement organization (OPO) to use current withdrawal of life support (WLS) protocols. Hospital ICU nurses/physicians are comfortable performing the emotionally draining procedure of WLS in the ICU while OPOs are reluctant to accept these donors due to increased warm ischemia (WI). In our area, several hospitals will only allow WLS to occur in the ICU. This study compares liver outcomes from DCD donors where death occurred in the ICU (DCDICU) vs the OR (DCDOR). METHODS: From March 2003 to June 2004, 34 DCD donors were recovered by our OPO. WLS occurred in the ICU for 26 donors (76%) and in the OR for 8 donors (24%). Thirteen of 26 DCDICU and 5 of 8 DCDOR livers were transplanted. Donor demographics, warm ischemic time, cold ischemic time, distance shipped, and recipient functions were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen livers were transplanted both locally and at distant transplant centers. Results are outlined in the . CONCLUSIONS: Although DCDICU donors averaged approximately 4 minutes longer WI than DCDOR donors, short-term results for both groups were equivalent. These findings support using DCDICU livers. DCDICU donors have the potential to significantly improve donor hospital cooperation.     

Applicability and results of Maastricht type 2 donation after cardiac death liver transplantation

Maastricht type 2 donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors suffer sudden and unexpected cardiac arrest, typically outside the hospital; they have significant potential to expand the donor pool. Herein, we analyze the results of transplanted livers and all potential donors treated under our type 2 DCD protocol. Cardiac arrest was witnessed; potential donors arrived at the hospital after attempts at resuscitation had failed. Death was declared based on the absence of cardiorespiratory activity during a 5-min no-touch period. Femoral vessels were cannulated to establish normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which was maintained until organ recovery. From April 2002 to December 2010, there were 400 potential donors; 34 liver transplants were performed (9%). Among recipients, median age, model for end-stage liver disease and cold and reperfusion warm ischemic times were 55 years (49-60), 19 (14-21) and 380 (325-430) and 30 min (26-35), respectively. Overall, 236 (59%) and 130 (32%) livers were turned down due to absolute and relative contraindications to donate, respectively. One-year recipient and graft survivals were 82% and 70%, respectively (median follow-up 24 months). The applicability of type 2 DCD liver transplant was <10%; however, with better preservation technology and expanded transplant criteria, we may be able to improve this figure significantly.     

Protective effects of ambroxol in hypothermic liver preservation: a transplant study.

The bronchosecretolytic agent ambroxol added to histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution has recently been shown to protect cold stored rat hepatocytes. The aim of the present study was to confirm these observations in a rat liver transplantation model. Before orthotopic liver transplantation, donor livers from 30 syngeneic Wistar rats were assigned to three groups (n = 10): (A) in situ flush (ISF) and 1/2-h cold storage (CS) with HTK solution, (B) ISF and 3-h CS with HTK, and (C) ISF and 3-h CS with HTK + 10(-3) mol/L ambroxol. The efficacy of the drug was evaluated by postoperative survival (> 14 days) and liver enzyme release (ALT), bile flow, histomorphological injury, and malondialdehyde (MDA) level in the grafts 15 min after reperfusion. After 1/2-h CS with HTK solution (A), 90% of the transplanted rats survived. In comparison with donor conditions, bile flow in the reperfused grafts decreased to 87 +/- 5.3%, whereas postoperative ALT levels slightly increased. After 3-h HTK preservation (B), the survival rate decreased to 60%, while ALT values markedly increased and bile flow after reperfusion declined to 82 +/- 6.6%. Ambroxol added to HTK solution (C) enhanced bile flow to 106 +/- 3.4%(p < .05), and reduced ALT and MDA levels and histomorphological injury of the transplanted livers, so that its beneficial effect in organ preservation has been confirmed in the transplant model. However, survival rate was not improved by the agent, probably because of the low cold ischemia tolerance of the Wistar rat livers used.     

Pediatric liver and kidney transplantation with allografts from DCD donors: A review of UNOS data

INTRODUCTION: Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is recognized as an important source of allografts to bridge the growing disequilibrium between the number of donors and recipients. Current transplant experience with DCD organs has focused on the adult recipient population, however little is known about the pediatric recipient experience. While there is increasing acceptance of these grafts in adults, transplant centers appear reluctant to use these grafts in the pediatric population. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing database from 1995-2005 to determine the national experience with pediatric recipients of DCD organs. RESULTS: Among 4026 renal transplants performed in children 18 years and younger, 26 (0.6%) received a renal allograft from a DCD donor. Ten (38.5%) received kidney allografts from pediatric donors (age < or = 18) and 16 (61.5%) from adult donors (age > 18 years). Graft survival at one and five years was 82.5%, 74.3% for kidneys from DCD donors compared to 89.6%, 64.8% from brain dead donors (DBD) (P = 0.7). Among 4991 liver transplants, 19 (0.4%) were from DCD donors. Sixteen patients (84.2%) received livers from pediatric donors and three (15.8%) from adult donors. Graft survival at one and five years was 89.2%, 79.3% for livers from DCD, compared to 75.6%, 65.8% for DBD (P = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The use of DCD donors in the pediatric population is very limited; however graft survival is comparable to DBD grafts. Although pediatric centers may have been reluctant to utilize this donor source, this limited experience demonstrates that the select use of DCD organs can produce acceptable and durable graft survival in the pediatric population.     

Organ donor management and organ outcome: a 6-year review from a Level I trauma center

A retrospective review of 114 solid organ donors over a 6-year period (1982-1987) was undertaken to identify problems in organ donor management and determine outcome of donated organs. Admission GCS was less than or equal to 4 in 84% of the donors. Complications included hypotension (81%), multiple transfusion requirements (63%), diabetes insipidus (53%), DIC (28%), arrhythmias (27%), cardiac arrest requiring CPR (25%), pulmonary edema (19%), hypoxia (11%), acidosis (11%), seizures (10%), and positive bacterial cultures (10%). Only 18% of organs were procured within 3 hours of brain death; 23% were procured more than 6 hours later. Six patients excluded from this study suffered cardiovascular collapse before their organs could be retrieved. From 114 organ donors, consent was obtained to procure 224 kidneys, 77 livers, 62 hearts, 35 pancreata, and ten heart-lung units. All 224 donated kidneys were procured and 202 were ultimately transplanted. Of 77 donated livers, 32 were procured; 31 transplanted. Of 62 donated hearts, 38 were procured; 29 transplanted and nine used for valves. Ten heart-lung units were donated; six were procured and transplanted. Of 35 donated pancreata, 11 were procured; only five were transplanted. Reasons for failure of donated organs to be procured or transplanted included abnormal organ characteristics, lack of compatible recipients, unavailability of surgical teams, organ injury during procurement, intraoperative arrest, and anatomic limitations precluding multiple organ procurement. This study identifies characteristics of organ donors and common organ-threatening complications. Rapid and continuing resuscitation of clinically brain dead trauma victims is mandatory.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Use of extended criteria livers decreases wait time for liver transplantation without adversely impacting posttransplant survival

INTRODUCTION: The use of extended criteria donors (ECDs) could minimize shortage of suitable donor livers for transplantation. In 3 years, the aggressive use of ECD livers has reduced the wait list at our center from 257 to 30 patients with a median wait time of 18 days without using living donors. This study compares the graft/patient survival from standard (SD) and ECD for our transplant population between 2001 and 2005. METHODS: Records of all adult liver transplant recipients over 4 years were reviewed (n = 571). ECD criteria included: age >59 years, BMI >34.9, maximum AST/ALT >500, maximum bilirubin >2.0, peak serum sodium >170, HBV/HCV/HTLV reactive, donation after cardiac death, cold ischemia time >12 hours, ICU stay >5 days, 3 or more pressors simultaneously, extensive alcohol abuse, cancer history (nonskin), active meningitis/bacteremia, or significant donor liver trauma. Outcomes included graft and patient survival at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years. RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of recipients (n = 388) received ECD livers. Primary factors accounting for ECD-liver status included: elevated liver function tests (20%), hypernatremia (12.6%), and extensive alcohol abuse (11.4%). Graft survival was (SD, ECD): 90-day 91%, 88%; 1-year 84%, 80%; 2-year 78%, 77%; patient survival was: 90-day 93%, 90%; 1-year 87%, 82%; 2-year 83%, 79%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis failed to demonstrate an overall difference in graft or patient survival at any time point. Only donor age >60 years was associated with decreased graft and patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Liver grafts from ECD can be used to dramatically reduce wait list time with outcomes comparable to those for SD without resorting to living donor liver transplantation.     

How can we utilize livers from advanced aged donors for liver transplantation for hepatitis C?

Advanced age donors have inferior outcomes of liver transplantation for Hepatitis C (HCV). Aged donors grafts may be transplanted into young or low model for end stage liver disease (MELD) patients in order to offset the effect of donor age. However, it is not well understood how to utilize liver grafts from advanced aged donors for HCV patients. Using the UNOS database, we retrospectively studied 7508 HCV patients who underwent primary liver transplantation. Risk factors for graft failure and graft survival using advanced aged grafts (donor age ≥ 60 years) were analyzed by Cox hazards models, donor risk index (DRI) and organ patient index (OPI). Recipient's age did not affect on graft survival regardless of donor age. Advanced aged grafts had significant inferior survival compared to younger aged grafts regardless of MELD score (P < 0.0001). Risk factors of HCV patients receiving advanced aged grafts included donation after cardiac death (DCD, HR: 1.69) and recent hospitalization (HR: 1.43). Advanced aged grafts showed significant difference in graft survival of HCV patients with stratification of DRI and OPI. In conclusion, there was no offsetting effect by use of advanced aged grafts into younger or low MELD patients. Advanced aged grafts, especially DCD, should be judiciously used for HCV patients with low MELD score.     

Organ Donation After Cardiac Death in the Middle East

Introduction

The shortage of organ donors along with the increased number of waiting recipients have created the need for new strategies to expand the organ pool: living donors, split livers, domino livers, and organs from donations after cardiac death (DCD). The purpose of this article was to focus upon aspects of DCD application in the religious, traditional, ethical, and legal aspects of the Arab world.

Background

DCD can increase the donor pool by 15%-25%. Several ethical, legal, and social concerns need to be addressed to make DCD more widely accepted by the general population in Western countries as well as in the Middle East. Organs from DCD donors have been transplanted since the 1960s. As soon as brain death criteria were published in 1968, organ retrieval from cadaveric heart-beating donors predominated. Donation after brain death (DBD) almost completely replaced DCD. In the 1990s, the organ shortage led to DCD in many countries, but not in the Arab world. DCD is still not accepted by most in the Arab world due to religious, ethical, social, and legal issues.

Conclusion

DCD in the Arab world is more complicated than in Western countries. It should be re-evaluated and thoroughly reviewed with the new criteria for DCD and its implementation in our region.     

Donor postextubation hypotension and age correlate with outcome after donation after cardiac death transplantation

BACKGROUND: Compared with standard donors, kidneys recovered from donors after cardiac death (DCD) exhibit higher rates of delayed graft function (DGF), and DCD livers demonstrate higher rates of biliary ischemia, graft loss, and worse patient survival. Current practice limits the use of these organs based on time from donor extubation to asystole, but data to support this is incomplete. We hypothesized that donor postextubation parameters, including duration and severity of hemodynamic instability or hypoxia might be a better predictor of subsequent graft function. METHODS: We performed a retrospective examination of the New England Organ Bank DCD database, concentrating on donor factors including vital signs after withdrawal of support. RESULTS: Prolonged, severe hypotension in the postextubation period was a better predictor of subsequent organ function that time from extubation to asystole. For DCD kidneys, this manifested as a trend toward increased DGF. For DCD livers, this manifested as increased rates of poor outcomes. Maximizing the predictive value of this test in the liver cohort suggested that greater than 15 min between the time when the donor systolic blood pressure drops below 50 mm Hg and flush correlates with increased rates of diffuse biliary ischemia, graft loss, or death. Donor age also correlated with worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Time between profound instability and cold perfusion is a better predictor of outcome than time from extubation to asystole. If validated, this information could be used to predict DGF after DCD renal transplant and improve outcomes after DCD liver transplant.     

Normothermic Acellular Ex Vivo Liver Perfusion Reduces Liver and Bile Duct Injury of Pig Livers Retrieved After Cardiac Death

We compared cold static with acellular normothermic ex vivo liver perfusion (NEVLP) as a novel preservation technique in a pig model of DCD liver injury. DCD livers (60 min warm ischemia) were cold stored for 4 h, or treated with 4 h cold storage plus 8 h NEVLP. First, the livers were reperfused with diluted blood as a model of transplantation. Liver injury was determined by ALT, oxygen extraction, histology, bile content analysis and hepatic artery (HA) angiography. Second, AST levels and bile production were assessed after DCD liver transplantation. Cold stored versus NEVLP grafts had higher ALT levels (350 ± 125 vs. 55 ± 35 U/L; p < 0.0001), decreased oxygen extraction (250 ± 65 mmHg vs. 410 ± 58 mmHg, p < 0.01) and increased hepatocyte necrosis (45% vs. 10%, p = 0.01). Levels of bilirubin, phospholipids and bile salts were fivefold decreased, while LDH was sixfold higher in cold stored versus NEVLP grafts. HA perfusion was decreased (twofold), and bile duct necrosis was increased (100% vs. 5%, p < 0.0001) in cold stored versus NEVLP livers. Following transplantation, mean serum AST level was higher in the cold stored versus NEVLP group (1809 ± 205 U/L vs. 524 ± 187 U/L, p < 0.05), with similar bile production (2.5 ± 1.2 cc/h vs. 2.8 ± 1.4 cc/h; p = 0.2). NEVLP improved HA perfusion and decreased markers of liver duct injury in DCD grafts.     

Donors with cardiac arrest: improved organ recovery but no preconditioning benefit in liver allografts

BACKGROUND: Historically, organ recovery rates in donors with cardiac arrest (CA) have been low, presumably from hemodynamic instability. We hypothesized that donor resuscitation has improved hemodynamic stability and organ recovery in CA donors, and that CA triggers ischemic preconditioning (IP) in liver grafts. METHODS: A total of 131 donor pairs with and without CA were matched in age, gender, and year of recovery. Hemodynamic stability was determined by vasopressor use. Abdominal and thoracic organs recovered and livers transplanted were compared between the groups. Liver graft function, injury, and IP benefit were examined by comparing liver chemistries after transplantation and postperfusion biopsies between recipients of grafts from both groups (n=40 each). RESULTS:Hemodynamic stability was similar in both groups, but recovery of thoracic organs was significantly lower in CA versus non-CA donors (35 vs. 53%, P<0.01). On the other hand, recovery rates of three or more abdominal organs from CA donors approached those of non-CA donors (77 vs. 87%, not significant). Although significantly fewer livers were transplanted from CA donors (69 vs. 85%, P<0.01), posttransplantation graft function and injury parameters were similar between the two groups, and CA did not appear to trigger IP. CONCLUSION: Compared with historical data, cardiovascular stability and abdominal organ recovery rates have improved considerably in CA donors. Liver grafts from CA donors function similarly to grafts from non-CA donors with no IP from CA. Our data support the increased use of livers and other organs from donors with CA.