Long‐term results of a multicenter study on subthalamic and pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease

We report the 5 to 6 year follow‐up of a multicenter study of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Thirty‐five STN patients and 16 GPi patients were assessed at 5 to 6 years after DBS surgery. Primary outcome measure was the stimulation effect on the motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assessed with a prospective cross‐over double‐blind assessment without medications (stimulation was randomly switched on or off). Secondary outcomes were motor UPDRS changes with unblinded assessments in off‐ and on‐medication states with and without stimulation, activities of daily living (ADL), anti‐PD medications, and dyskinesias. In double‐blind assessment, both STN and GPi DBS were significantly effective in improving the motor UPDRS scores (STN, P < 0.0001, 45.4%; GPi, P = 0.008, 20.0%) compared with off‐stimulation, regardless of the sequence of stimulation. In open assessment, both STN‐ and GPi‐DBS significantly improved the off‐medication motor UPDRS when compared with before surgery (STN, P < 0.001, 50.5%; GPi, P = 0.002, 35.6%). Dyskinesias and ADL were significantly improved in both groups. Anti‐PD medications were significantly reduced only in the STN group. Adverse events were more frequent in the STN group. These results confirm the long‐term efficacy of STN and GPi DBS in advanced PD. Although the surgical targets were not randomized, there was a trend to a better outcome of motor signs in the STN‐DBS patients and fewer adverse events in the GPi‐DBS group. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Parkinson‐related genetics in patients treated with deep brain stimulation

Johansen KK, Jørgensen JV, White LR, Farrer MJ, Aasly JO. Parkinson‐related genetics in patients treated with deep brain stimulation.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2011: 123: 201–206.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives – To analyze the frequency of mutations associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD) in a general PD population compared to patients with PD selected for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and evaluate the outcome of surgery. Material and methods – A total of 630 consecutive patients with PD were genetically screened, and 60 had DBS surgery, 37 subthalamic nucleus (STN), 21 ventrointermediate nucleus of thalamus (VIM), and two globus pallidus internus (GPi). Results – Mutations in LRRK2, PRKN, and PINK1 were found: the first two of these being overrepresented in STN‐operated patients, but none being found in VIM‐operated patients. Clinical outcome of the surgery was similar in patients with mutations compared to those without. Conclusions – In a consecutive PD population, patients treated with STN‐DBS are overrepresented for PD‐related mutations and they seem to benefit from DBS as well as patients without mutations.     

STN vs. Pallidal Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Improvement With Experience and Better Patient Selection

Objectives. This is a prospective study to determine the outcomes of subthalamic nucleus (STN) vs. globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) at our institution. Materials and Methods. We studied a total of 39 patients — 29 with STN and 10 with GPi DBS over a period of up to 6 years. Mean ages in the two groups were similar (59 and 60 years, respectively) and disease duration prior to implantation was similar (9.6 and 11.7 years, respectively). Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) was recorded preoperatively and at follow‐up (at least at 6‐month intervals). Medications also were recorded, and each patient's levodopa equivalent units (LEU) were calculated. Results were analyzed using a paired Student's t‐test. Results. LEU reduced significantly (p < 0.05) in the STN group (5.7 to 3.7) but not the GPi group. Both targets significantly improved part 3 and part 4 scores of the UPDRS but GPi DBS did not improve part 2 scores (activities of daily living). STN DBS had much better outcome on the motor “off” scores of the UPDRS, whereas GPi only improved tremor. A comparison of the “earliest 10” and “most recent 10” STN patients showed a significant improvement in outcome in the most recent cases. Conclusions. In our group, STN was more effective for alleviating the symptoms of Parkinson disease, even in older patients with significant dyskinesias. Better patient selection and greater experience have led to more improvement in the more recent patients.     

Combination targeting of subthalamic nucleus and ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus with a single trajectory in deep brain stimulation for tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has traditionally been used to target the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) to treat Parkinson’s disease (PD) and the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) to treat essential tremor (ET). Recent case reports have described targeting both the STN and VIM with a single trajectory and electrode to treat patients with tremor-dominant PD, yet outcome data for this procedure remains sparse. Our objective is to determine the safety and efficacy of combination STN-VIM DBS. We conducted a single-center retrospective case series of all patients who underwent combined STN-VIM DBS. Demographic, perioperative, and outcome data, including Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS) and tremor scores (OFF-medication), and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), were collected and analyzed. Nineteen patients underwent this procedure. Patients were 89% male and 11% female, with a mean age of 63.6 years. Mean preoperative UPDRS was 24.1, and LEDD was 811.8. At a mean follow-up of 33.8 months, UPDRS and LEDD decreased by an average of 9.2 (38.2%) and 326.3 (40.2%), respectively. Tremor scores decreased by 4.9 (59.0%), and 58% were able to decrease total medication burden. One patient developed transient left-sided weakness, yielding a complication rate of 5.3%. Combined targeting of STN and VIM thalamus via a single frontal trajectory for tremor-dominant Parkinson’s Disease results in similar UPDRS outcomes to STN DBS and improved control of tremor symptoms. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to validate this as the optimal DBS target for tremor-dominant PD.     

Light subunit of neurofilament triplet protein in the cerebrospinal fluid after subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson's disease

Constantinescu R, Holmberg B, Rosengren L, Corneliusson O, Johnels B, Zetterberg H. Light subunit of neurofilament triplet protein in the cerebrospinal fluid after subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson’s disease.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2011: 124: 206–210.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives – Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of neurofilament triplet protein (NFL), a non‐specific marker of neuronal damage, are normal in Parkinson’s disease (PD) but increased after brain trauma and in several neurological disorders. Using longitudinal CSF‐NFL measurements as an indicator of neuronal damage, this study investigated the impact of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) on the brain, directly following the surgical intervention and in chronically treated patients with PD. Materials and methods – CSF‐NFL levels were measured consecutively in eight patients with PD before and after STN‐DBS treatment. Results – CSF‐NFL levels were normal prior to STN‐DBS and increased sharply during the first 2 weeks post‐operatively, but normalized after 12 months or more. Conclusion – The STN‐DBS procedure leads to an acute but limited neuronal damage, as expected. However, normal CSF‐NFL levels at 12 months post‐operatively and beyond suggest the absence of any long‐term neuronal damage caused by long‐term STN‐DBS stimulation.     

The latest evidence on target selection in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is one of the most promising neuromodulatory techniques to gain momentum over the last 20 years, with significant evidence showing the benefit of DBS for Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, many questions still exist pertaining to the optimal placement of stimulation contacts. This paper aims to review the latest and most relevant studies evaluating subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) stimulation. Additionally, it aims to shine a light on several of the lesser-known targets with mounting evidence of efficacy. Referenced literature for the main body of the article was gathered from Medline and PubMed databases. Results were limited to “full text”, “English language” and publications from 1999 onwards. Case reports were excluded. The current evidence irrefutably demonstrates the benefits of both STN and GPi DBS on Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III motor scores, with very similar outcomes seen after 1–2 years. Currently, it appears the greatest differences lie in the associated adverse effects. STN DBS was associated with a greater reduction in dopamine replacement therapy, but also appeared to have more negative effects on speech and mood. Meanwhile, in regards to alternative targets, the pedunculopontine nucleus has shown promising improvement in axial symptoms, while the ventral intermediate nucleus has demonstrated significant efficacy at suppressing tremor, and the caudal zona incerta may be superior to the STN and GPi in improving UPDRS-III scores. Due to the complexity of Parkinson’s disease, an individual disease profile must be determined in a patient-by-patient fashion such that appropriate targets can be selected accordingly.     

Two‐year follow‐up on the effect of unilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation in highly asymmetric Parkinson's disease

Although bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) provides greater relief from the symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) than unilateral STN DBS, it has been suggested that unilateral STN DBS may be a reasonable treatment option in selected patients, especially those with highly asymmetric PD. In previous studies on the effect of unilateral STN DBS, the asymmetry of PD symptoms was not prominent and the mean follow‐up durations were only 3 to 12 months. In this study, we report our findings in a series of 8 patients with highly asymmetric PD who were treated with unilateral STN DBS and were followed for 24 months. Serial changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score and subscores in the ipsilateral, contralateral, and axial body parts were analyzed. Unilateral STN DBS improved the UPDRS motor score and the contralateral subscore in the on‐medication state for 5 nonfluctuating patients and in the off‐medication state for 3 fluctuating patients. However, the ipsilateral subscore progressively worsened and reversed asymmetry became difficult to manage, which led to compromised medication and stimulator adjustment. At 24 months, all the patients were considering the second‐side surgery. Our results suggest that bilateral STN DBS should be considered even in highly asymmetric PD. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society     

Pallidal vs subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been reported to relieve motor symptoms and levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Although it has been suggested that stimulation of the STN may be superior to stimulation of the GPi, comparative trials are limited. OBJECTIVE: To extend our randomized, blinded pilot comparison of the safety and efficacy of STN and GPi stimulation in patients with advanced PD. DESIGN: This study represents the combined results from our previously published, randomized, blinded, parallel-group pilot study and additional patients enrolled in our single-center extension study. SETTING: Oregon Health and Science University in Portland.Patients Twenty-three patients with idiopathic PD, levodopa-induced dyskinesia, and response fluctuations were randomized to implantation of bilateral GPi or STN stimulators. Patients and evaluating clinicians were blinded to stimulation site. All patients were tested preoperatively while taking and not taking medications and after 3, 6, and 12 months of DBS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperatively, response of symptoms to DBS, medication, and combined medication and DBS was evaluated. Twenty patients (10 in the GPi group and 10 in the STN group) completed 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Off-medication Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores were improved after 12 months of both GPi and STN stimulation (39% vs 48%). Bradykinesia tended to improve more with STN than GPi stimulation. No improvement in on-medication function was observed in either group. Levodopa dose was reduced by 38% in STN stimulation patients compared with 3% in GPi stimulation patients (P = .08). Dyskinesia was reduced by stimulation at both GPi and STN (89% vs 62%). Cognitive and behavioral complications were observed only in combination with STN stimulation. CONCLUSION: Stimulation of either the GPi or STN improves many features of advanced PD. It is premature to exclude GPi as an appropriate target for DBS in patients with advanced disease.     

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Five years' personal experience

Background and purposeThe objective of the study was to assess bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD).Material and methodsThe study population included 5 patients with bilateral STN DBS who completed a 5-year postoperative follow-up period. In all patients electrodes (Model 3387 or 3389) were stereotactically bilaterally inserted into the STN using a Leksell stereotactic G frame. The clinical rating tests included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and two motor-timed tests derived from CAPIT (rapid movements between two points and stand-walk-sit test). All patients were assessed in off and on condition before implantation and 1, 3 and 5 years in medication on and off condition and stimulation on condition and stimulation off condition. To compare preoperative to postoperative UPDRS scores, only mean values and standard deviations are presented because of the small study population.ResultsThe stimulation effect was noted in the off state, resulting in a 59% improvement in motor scores of UPDRS at 5-year follow-up, when compared to preoperative scores. In the on state the stimulation improved motor scores by 17%. At 5-year follow-up, reduction of daily levodopa dose was 50%.ConclusionsBilateral STN DBS is an effective and safe treatment for patients with advanced PD. Bilateral STN DBS contributes to improvement of parkinsonian symptoms in the off state and levodopa-induced dyskinesia. This can be correlated with a 50% reduction of daily levodopa dose 5 years postoperatively.     

Comparison of weight gain and energy intake after subthalamic versus pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease

To compare body mass index (BMI) and daily energy intake (DEI) after subthalamic versus pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS). Weight gain following DBS in Parkinson's disease patients remains largely unexplained and no comparison of subthalamic and pallidal (GPi) stimulation has yet been performed. BMI and DEI, dopaminergic drug administration and motor scores were recorded in 46 patients with PD before STN (n = 32) or GPi (n = 14) DBS and 3 and 6 months after. At M6, BMI had increased by an average of 8.4% in the STN group and 3.2% in the GPi group. BMI increased in 28 STN and 9 GPi patients. This increase was significantly higher in the STN group (P < 0.048) and the difference remained significant after adjustment for reduced dopaminergic medication; 28.6% of GPi patients were overweight at 6 months (14.3% preoperatively) versus 37.5% of STN patients (21.9% preoperatively). Changes in BMI were negatively correlated with changes in dyskinesia in the GPi–DBS group. Food intake did not change in the two groups, either quantitatively or qualitatively. Frequent weight gain, inadequately explained by motor improvement or reduced dopaminergic drug dosage, occurred in subthalamic DBS patients. The difference between groups suggests additional factors in the STN group, such as homeostatic control center involvement. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

Staged unilateral versus bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulator implantation in Parkinson disease.

In 17 consecutive patients with Parkinson disease (PD), bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulators were implanted during staged surgeries. The Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the Dyskinesia Disability Scale were completed both off and on medication prior to any surgery and also OFF and ON stimulation after each surgery. On-medication UPDRS activities of daily living (ADL) and motor examination scores changed little with unilateral or bilateral stimulation. Off-medication UPDRS motor examination scores improved to similar degrees after each staged STN electrode implantation. Most of the improvements in off-medication ADL scores, dyskinesia scores, complications of therapy, and medication dose reduction occurred after unilateral STN stimulation with smaller improvements after the second operation.     

Greater improvement in quality of life following unilateral deep brain stimulation surgery in the globus pallidus as compared to the subthalamic nucleus

While deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is a well-accepted treatment for Parkinson disease (PD) that improves overall quality of life (QoL), its effects across different domains of QoL are unclear. The study reported here directly compared the effects of unilateral DBS in subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus (GPi) on QoL in 42 non-demented patients with medication-refractory PD. Patients were enrolled in the COMPARE trial, a randomized clinical trial of cognitive and mood effects of STN versus GPi DBS conducted at the University of Florida Movement Disorders Center. Patients underwent motor, mood, verbal fluency and QoL (Parkinson disease questionnaire: PDQ-39) measures before and 6 months following surgery. Groups experienced motor and mood improvements that did not differ by target. Patients with STN DBS evidenced a slight decrement on letter fluency. On average, all patients endorsed better overall QoL after surgery. However, despite similar motor and mood improvements, GPi patients improved more than STN patients (38 vs. 14%, respectively; P = 0.03). Patients reported better QoL on subscales of mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs), emotional well-being, stigma, cognition and discomfort, but not on those of social support and communication. Improvements on the mobility, ADLs, stigma and social support subscales were greater amongst GPi patients. In regression analyses, only depression changes independently predicted changes in overall QoL as well as emotional well-being and social support changes. Within the STN group only, declining category fluency scores correlated with poorer QoL on the communication subscale. Unilateral DBS in both STN and GPi improved QoL overall and in disparate domains 6 months after surgery. Patients receiving GPi DBS reported greater improvements that cannot be explained by differential mood or motor effects; however, verbal fluency changes may have partially contributed to lesser QoL improvements amongst STN patients.     

Globus pallidus stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) has become an accepted therapeutic modality in selected Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with severe levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) and on-off motor fluctuations. In comparison to subthalamic nucleus DBS there is a paucity of data on GPi DBS outcomes. We present our experience with a group of 20 PD patients (9 unilateral, 11 bilateral) who underwent GPi stimulation. PD motor symptoms were assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III scores and subscores, and dyskinesia using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), UPDRS part IVa, and clinical global impression (CGI). At mean follow-up time of 7 months, bilateral stimulation reduced off-period motor scores by a mean of 46% and on-period motor scores by 18%. Unilateral stimulation reduced off-period motor scores by 18%. Dyskinesia severity was reduced by 76%, which was maintained after a mean follow-up time of 35 months. Antiparkinsonian medication dosage was unchanged. No major adverse effects were seen. Unilateral and bilateral GPi DBS provides lasting benefit in PD patients with severe LID. Beneficial effects on off-period motor symptoms are greater with bilateral stimulation; however, with maintenance of dopaminergic medication, unilateral procedures can also provide important and sustained benefits.     

Change in fatigue after bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

BackgroundBilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves motor function in patients with medically intractable Parkinson’s disease (PD), but the effects of STN DBS on fatigue are unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of STN DBS on fatigue scores in patients with PD.MethodsTwenty PD patients underwent bilateral STN DBS surgery at our institution from 2007 to 2009. Only data from the 17 patients who completed the Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS) and Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) before and approximately 6 months after surgery were analyzed. Other evaluations included the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).ResultsWhen the cohort was analyzed as a whole, there was no significant change in the mean or binary PFS score from baseline to the 6 month evaluation. However, the fatigue response of individual subjects was variable. Six of 12 subjects with fatigue before surgery were not fatigued post-operatively, while 3/5 subjects without fatigue before surgery became fatigued after DBS surgery. Fatigue in 8 subjects remained unchanged. Change in fatigue scores correlated significantly with change in the motor UPDRS, GDS and AES. Improvement in PFS also correlated with a higher PFS baseline score and higher baseline UPDRS motor off score.ConclusionsChanges in fatigue severity were not observed in our cohort as a whole, but there were changes in fatigue on an individual level. These changes appear to be related to the effects of STN DBS on motor improvement and mood.     

Heart rate variability in Parkinson's disease unaffected by deep brain stimulation

Trachani E, Constantoyannis C, Sakellaropoulos GC, Stavrinou ML, Nikiforidis G, Chroni E. Heart rate variability in Parkinson’s disease unaffected by deep brain stimulation.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2012: 126: 56–61.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives – Our aim was to investigate the impact of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN‐DBS) on the cardiovagal control of patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. Materials and methods – Twenty‐four patients (mean age: 62.1 ± 9.4 years) were examined 3 days before and 6 months after DBS by a questionnaire, blood pressure monitoring and a battery of neurophysiological tests: time domain analysis of RR interval variation during normal and deep breathing (DB), Valsalva manoeuvre, and tilt test. By off‐line, performed frequency domain analysis of heart rate variation, total power (TP), low frequency band (LF) band, high‐frequency (HF) band, and their normalized units were estimated. The neurophysiological measurements were compared to those of 24 healthy controls. Results – The values of time domain variables were pre‐ and postoperatively lower in patients than in controls. A significant reduction was found in LF band after the implantation. Orthostatic hypotension was present in 45.8% of the patients preoperatively and 12.5% postoperatively. There was no correlation between DBS‐related changes of motor function and corresponding neurophysiological measurements, but patients with more than 60% motor improvement had higher time domain parameters’ values than the others. Conclusions – STN‐DBS offered no considerable impact on autonomic cardiovascular control.     

GPi and STN deep brain stimulation can suppress dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease

ObjectivesTo compare subthalamic nucleus (STN) to globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for control of motor fluctuations and for potential dyskinesia-suppressing qualities.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective database review of all patients who underwent GPi or STN DBS for idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Direct dyskinesia suppression (dDS) was defined as improvement in dyskinesia subscore of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part IV (items 32–34), despite lack of reduction in dopaminergic medication dosage. We analyzed the data using methods appropriate for a case–control study.ResultsA total of 133 patients were evaluated. At the last evaluation Dyskinesia scores and motor fluctuations significantly improved in both the GPi (p < 0.0001) and STN groups (p < 0.0001). The GPi group was more likely than the STN group to experience dDS (odds ratio = 1.95, 95% CI = 0.556, 3.21). However, the association between DBS target and dDS was not statistically significant (Pearson chi-square = 2.286, p = 0.131).ConclusionsThe overall clinical outcome of STN and GPi DBS for control of dyskinesia and motor fluctuations was similar. STN and GPi DBS both had some direct dyskinesia suppression effects.     

The persistent effects of unilateral pallidal and subthalamic deep brain stimulation on force control in advanced Parkinson's patients

The persistent effects of unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) on specific movement parameters produced by Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of unilateral GPi and STN DBS on the force-producing capabilities of PD patients during maximal efforts and functional bimanual dexterity. Clinical and biomechanical data were collected from 14 unilaterally implanted patients (GPi=7; STN=7), at least 13 months post-DBS surgery, during On and Off stimulation in the absence of medication. Unilateral DBS of either location produced a 33% improvement in UPDRS motor scores. Significant gains in maximum force production were present in both limbs during unimanual efforts. The greatest increase in maximum force, for both limbs, was under bimanual conditions. Force in the contralateral limb increased more than 30% during bimanual efforts while ipsilateral force increased by 25%. Unilateral DBS improved grasping force control and consistency of digit placement during the performance of a bimanual dexterity task. The clinical and biomechanical data indicate that unilateral DBS of GPi or STN results in persistent improvements in the control and coordination of grasping forces during maximal efforts and functional dexterous actions. Unilateral DBS implantation of either site should be considered an option for those patients in which bilateral procedures are contraindicated.     

Bilateral Implantation of Centromedian‐Parafascicularis Complex and GPi: A New Combination of Unconventional Targets for Deep Brain Stimulation in Severe Parkinson Disease

Objectives. Traditional deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has proved to be efficacious on core Parkinsonian symptoms. However, very disabling l ‐dopa–induced abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) and axial signs are slightly affected, suggesting that we target less conventional targets. Our candidates for DBS were the globus pallidus internus (GPi) plus the intralaminar thalamic complex (Pf or CM), given its extensive functional links with basal ganglia nuclei. Materials and Methods. The routine utilization of our innovative stereotactic apparatus allows us to implant, at the same time, both the CM‐Pf complex together with the GPi in six Parkinson disease patients. Both intraoperative and postoperative neurophysiologic assessments helped us recognize functional subregions while optimizing implantation of electrodes. Unified Parkinson disease rating scale (UPDRS) motor scores, AIMs, and freezing were carefully blindly evaluated for each condition. Results. A significant amelioration of UPDRS scores was achieved by simultaneous activation of both targets. CM‐Pf activation was only slightly effective in reducing rigidity and akinesia, but more efficacious on freezing. Not surprisingly, AIMs were peculiarly decreased by the activation of the permanent electro‐catheter in the posteroventral GPi. Conclusions. These findings confirm that, in selected patients, it is conceivable to target structures other than the conventional STN in order to maximize clinical benefit.     

Motor features and response to oral levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease under continuous dopaminergic infusion or deep brain stimulation

Background: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) and continuous dopaminergic infusions (jejunal levodopa or subcutaneous apomorphine) are indicated in complicated Parkinson’s disease (PD), although it remains unsettled how they compare to each other. Methods: We investigated the daytime motor condition in patients with advanced PD under monotherapy with jejunal levodopa, subcutaneous apomorphine, or STN DBS and also measured the motor changes produced by an additional standard morning dose of levodopa. Motor performance was assessed with the UPDRS‐III, hand taps, the AIMS dyskinesia score and patients’ diaries. Outcome measures were time to best motor ‘on’ after start of morning treatment, daytime variability of motor condition, motor scores. Results: The time to ‘on’ was longest in the jejunal levodopa group. DBS and jejunal levodopa treatments produced stable motor conditions without appreciable ‘off’ episodes. Continuous apomorphine infusion was associated with the worst motor scores (UPDRS‐III and taps) and the most frequent off‐states. Jejunal levodopa infusion was associated with the highest AIMS scores. Addition of a levodopa dose produced shortening of time to ‘on’ and a transient motor improvement in the jejunal levodopa group without increase in dyskinesias; in the DBS and apomorphine groups, there was an increase in dyskinesias without changes in UPDRS‐III or taps. Conclusions: STN DBS provided adequate trade‐off between motor improvement and dyskinesia control, although dyskinesias could be elicited by adding oral levodopa. Jejunal levodopa infusion produced adequate motor improvement with slow time to ‘on’ and moderate dyskinesias. Apomorphine infusion produced insufficient motor control and negligible dyskinesias.     

Change of the melanocortin system caused by bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease

Escamilla‐Sevilla F, Pérez‐Navarro MJ, Muñoz‐Pasadas M, Sáez‐Zea C, Jouma‐Katati M, Piédrola‐Maroto G, Ramírez‐Navarro A, Mínguez‐Castellanos A. Change of the melanocortin system caused by bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2011: 124: 275–281.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives – Determine whether bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation (STN–DBS) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with an increase in neuropeptide Y (NPY) and/or resistance to inhibition by leptin in relation to post‐surgery weight gain. Materials and Methods – This prospective study included 20 patients who underwent bilateral STN–DBS and 17 who refused surgery. Data were obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 months on neurological and nutritional status, including determination of body mass index (BMI) and serum NPY and leptin levels. Results – NPY and leptin levels changed over time, with a distinct pattern. The BMI increase at 6 months was greater in the surgical group (5.5 ± 6.3% vs 0.5 ± 3.5%; P = 0.035). Medical group exhibited a reduction in leptin level (−2.0 ± 4.3 ng/ml) and a consequent increase in NPY level (72.4 ± 58.7 pmol/ml). However, STN–DBS patients showed an increase in leptin (3.1 ± 5.0 ng/ml; P = 0.001 vs medical group) and also in NPY (12.1 ± 53.6 pmol/ml; P = 0.022 vs medical group) levels, which suggests resistance to inhibition by leptin. Rise in NPY level correlated with higher stimulation voltages. Conclusions – Bilateral STN–DBS causes disruption of the melanocortin system, probably related to diffusion of the electric current to the hypothalamus. This mechanism may in part explain the weight gain of patients with PD after surgery.