Pattern of liver function and clinical profile in COVID-19: A cross-sectional study of 91 patients

Background– COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 leads to myriad range of organ involvement including liver dysfunction.AimTo analyse the liver function in patients with COVID-19 and their association with respect to age, sex, severity of disease and clinical features.Materials and methodsThis study was a cross-sectional study done at Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi. 91 patients admitted with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in this study and divided into asymptomatic, mild, moderate and severe groups. Liver function tests were compared among different severity groups.ResultsOf 91 patients with COVID-19, 70 (76.9%) had abnormal liver function. Aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin levels was 1–2 × ULN in 33(36.3%), 34(37.3%), 12(13.2%), 6(6.6%) cases and >2 × ULN in 20(22%), 18(19.8%), 7(7.7%) and 2 (2.2%) cases respectively. Mean AST and ALP levels among different severity groups of COVID-19 was statistically significant (p < 0.05) whereas mean ALT and total bilirubin levels was statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference between males and females with regard to abnormal liver function. Liver injury was seen in 64.3% cases of hypertension and 73.3% cases of diabetes. Fever, myalgia, headache and breathlessness were found to be correlated significantly with severity of disease.ConclusionLiver injury is common in SARS-CoV-2 infection and is more prevalent in the severe disease group. Aspartate transaminase and alkaline phosphatase are better indicators of covid-19 induced liver injury than alanine transaminase and total bilirubin.     

Cardiac Phenotypes and Markers of Adverse Outcome in Elite Athletes With Ventricular Arrhythmias

ObjectivesThis study describes the cardiac phenotypes and markers of adverse outcome in athletes with ventricular arrhythmias with no other discernable etiology than high exercise doses.BackgroundLittle is known about phenotypes and risk markers of life-threatening arrhythmic events in athletes with ventricular arrhythmia.MethodsWe compared high-performance athletes who have ventricular arrhythmia with healthy controls using clinical data and cardiac imaging. None of the patients had family history of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy or any other discernable etiology of ventricular arrhythmia. Right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) function was assessed by echocardiographic longitudinal strain (right ventricular free wall strain longitudinal [RVFWSL] and left ventricular global longitudinal strain [LVGLS]). Mechanical dispersion was defined as the standard deviation of time to peak strain in 16 LV segments. RV ejection fraction and presence of late gadolinium enhancement was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance.ResultsWe included 43 athletes (45 ± 14 years of age, 16% female) with ventricular arrhythmias and 30 healthy athletes (41 ± 9 years of age, 7% female). Athletes with ventricular arrhythmias had worse RV function than healthy athletes by echocardiography (RVFWSL: ?22.9 ± 4.8% vs. ?26.6 ± 3.3%; p < 0.001) and by cardiac magnetic resonance (RV ejection fraction 48 ± 7% vs. 52 ± 6%; p = 0.04), and had more late gadolinium enhancement (24% vs. 3%; p = 0.03). Life-threatening arrhythmic events (aborted cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy) had occurred in 23 (53%) athletes with ventricular arrhythmias. These had impaired LV function compared to those with less severe ventricular arrhythmias (LVGLS: -17.1 ± 3.0% vs. -18.8 ± 2.0%; p = 0.04). LV mechanical dispersion was an independent marker of life-threatening events (adjusted odds ratio: 2.2 [1.1 to 4.8] by 10 ms increments; p = 0.03).ConclusionsAthletes with ventricular arrhythmias had impaired RV function and more myocardial fibrosis compared to healthy athletes. Athletes with life-threatening arrhythmic events had additional LV contraction abnormalities. These phenotypes mimic arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and may potentially be induced by high doses of exercise in susceptible individuals.     

Afección pericárdica y miocárdica tras infección por SARS-CoV-2: estudio descriptivo transversal en trabajadores sanitarios

Introduction and objectivesThe cardiac sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection are still poorly documented. We conducted a cross-sectional study in healthcare workers to report evidence of pericardial and myocardial involvement after SARS-CoV-2 infection.MethodsWe studied 139 healthcare workers with confirmed past SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants underwent clinical assessment, electrocardiography, and laboratory tests, including immune cell profiling and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Clinically suspected pericarditis was diagnosed when classic criteria were present and clinically suspected myocarditis was based on the combination of at least 2 CMR criteria.ResultsMedian age was 52 (41-57) years, 71.9% were women, and 16.5% were previously hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia. On examination (10.4 [9.3-11.0] weeks after infection-like symptoms), participants showed hemodynamic stability. Chest pain, dyspnea or palpitations were present in 41.7% participants, electrocardiographic abnormalities in 49.6%, NT-proBNP elevation in 7.9%, troponin in 0.7%, and CMR abnormalities in 60.4%. A total of 30.9% participants met criteria for either pericarditis and/or myocarditis: isolated pericarditis was diagnosed in 5.8%, myopericarditis in 7.9%, and isolated myocarditis in 17.3%. Most participants (73.2%) showed altered immune cell counts in blood, particularly decreased eosinophil (27.3%; P < .001) and increased cytotoxic T cell numbers (17.3%; P < .001). Clinically suspected pericarditis was associated (P < .005) with particularly elevated cytotoxic T cells and decreased eosinophil counts, while participants diagnosed with clinically suspected myopericarditis or myocarditis had lower (P < .05) neutrophil counts, natural killer-cells, and plasma cells.ConclusionsPericardial and myocardial involvement with clinical stability are frequent after SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with specific immune cell profiles.Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en     

Outcomes of patients undergoing elective liver and pancreas cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international,multicentre, prospective cohort study

BackgroundThe effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection upon HPB cancer surgery perioperative outcomes is unclear. Establishing risk is key to individualising treatment pathways.We aimed to identify the mortality rate and complications risk for HPB cancer elective surgery during the pandemic.MethodsInternational, prospective, multicentre study of consecutive adult patients undergoing elective HPB cancer operations during the initial SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Primary outcome was 30-day perioperative mortality. Secondary outcomes included major and surgery-specific 30-day complications. Multilevel cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models estimated association of SARS-CoV-2 and postoperative outcomes.ResultsAmong 2038 patients (259 hospitals, 49 countries; liver n = 1080; pancreas n = 958) some 6.2%, n = 127, contracted perioperative SARS-CoV-2. Perioperative mortality (9.4%, 12/127 vs 2.6%, 49/1911) and major complications (29.1%, 37/127 vs 13.2%, 253/1911) were higher with SARS-CoV-2 infection, persisting when age, sex and comorbidity were accounted for (HR survival 4.15, 95% CI 1.64 to 10.49; OR major complications 3.41, 95% CI 1.72 to 6.75). SARS-CoV-2 was associated with late postoperative bleeding (11.0% vs 4.2%) and grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (17.9% vs 8.6%).ConclusionSARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with significantly higher perioperative morbidity and mortality. Patients without SARS-CoV-2 had acceptable morbidity and mortality rates, highlighting the need to protect patients to enable safe ongoing surgery.     

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels are associated with poor clinical outcomes in COVID-19

Background and aimsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the sole causative agent of coronavirus infectious disease-19 (COVID-19).Methods and resultsWe performed a retrospective single-center study of consecutively admitted patients between March 1st and May 15th^, 2020, with a definitive diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary end-point was to evaluate the association of lipid markers with 30-days all-cause mortality in COVID-19.A total of 654 patients were enrolled, with an estimated 30-day mortality of 22.8% (149 patients). Non-survivors had lower total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels during the entire course of the disease. Both showed a significant inverse correlation with inflammatory markers and a positive correlation with lymphocyte count. In a multivariate analysis, LDL-c ≤ 69 mg/dl (hazard ratio [HR] 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–3.31), C-reactive protein >88 mg/dl (HR 2.44; 95% CI, 1.41–4.23) and lymphopenia <1000 (HR 2.68; 95% CI, 1.91–3.78) at admission were independently associated with 30-day mortality. This association was maintained 7 days after admission. Survivors presented with complete normalization of their lipid profiles on short-term follow-up.ConclusionHypolipidemia in SARS-CoV-2 infection may be secondary to an immune-inflammatory response, with complete recovery in survivors. Low LDL-c serum levels are independently associated with higher 30-day mortality in COVID-19 patients.     

Exercise Pulmonary Hypertension Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Dyspnea on Effort

BackgroundAbnormal pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) responses to exercise have been described in select individuals; however, clinical and prognostic implications of exercise pulmonary hypertension (exPH) among broader samples remains unclear.ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate the association of exPH with clinical determinants and outcomes.MethodsThe authors studied individuals with chronic exertional dyspnea and preserved ejection fraction who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Exercise pulmonary hypertension was ascertained using minute-by-minute PAP and cardiac output (CO) measurements to calculate a PAP/CO slope, and exPH defined as a PAP/CO slope >3 mm Hg/l/min. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization or all-cause mortality.ResultsAmong 714 individuals (age 57 years, 59% women), 296 (41%) had abnormal PAP/CO slopes. Over a mean follow-up of 3.7 ± 2.9 years, there were 208 CV or death events. Individuals with abnormal PAP/CO slope had a 2-fold increased hazard of future CV or death event (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio: 2.03; 95% confidence interval: 1.48 to 2.78; p < 0.001). The association of abnormal PAP/CO slope with outcomes remained significant after excluding rest PH (n = 146, hazard ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.21 to 2.54; p = 0.003). Both pre- and post-capillary contributions to exPH independently predicted adverse events (p < 0.001 for both).ConclusionsExercise pulmonary hypertension is independently associated with CV event-free survival among individuals undergoing evaluation of chronic dyspnea. These findings suggest incremental value of exercise hemodynamic assessment to resting measurements alone in characterizing the burden of PH in individuals with dyspnea. Whether PH and PH subtypes unmasked by exercise can be used to guide targeted therapeutic interventions requires further investigation.     

Remdesivir en pacientes trasplantados renales con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2

BackgroundRemdesivir is the only antiviral treatment that has been shown to be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. It shorts hospitalization time compared to placebo. Its effects in kidney transplant (KT) patients are limited to some published cases.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational study that included all KT patients admitted between August 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who received remdesivir.The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a cohort of KT patients treated with remdesivir.DiscussionA total of 37 KT patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 of them received treatment with remdesivir. The rest of the patients did not receive the drug due to either CKD-EPI less than 30 mL/min or they did not present clinical criteria. In addition to remdesivir, all patients received dexamethasone and anticoagulation therapy. 4 were men, the median age was 59 (53–71) years. Median time from transplantation was 43 (16–82) months. Chest X-rays of all patients showed pulmonary infiltrates and required low-oxygen flow therapy upon admission, requiring high-flow nasal therapy in 3 cases. Only 2 cases presented deterioration of the graft function, not requiring hemodialysis in any case, and all recovered renal function at hospital discharge. 2 patients rise up 1.5 times the liver function test. No patient died or required admission to the critical care unit. Median days of admission was 12 (9–27) days.ConclusionsOur study suggests that the use of remdesivir could be useful in KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia without side effects. Additional studies are necessary with a larger number of patients to improve the knowledge of this drug in SARS-CoV-2 infection.     

SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in diabetes mellitus. Population-based study on ascertained infections,hospital admissions and mortality in an Italian region with ∼5 million inhabitants and ∼250,000 diabetic people

Background and aimsDiabetes conveys an increased risk of infectious diseases and related mortality. We investigated risk of ascertained SARS-CoV-2 infection in diabetes subjects from the Veneto Region, Northeastern Italy, as well as the risk of being admitted to hospital or intensive care unit (ICU), or mortality for COVID-19.Methods and resultsDiabetic subjects were identified by linkage of multiple health archives. The rest of the population served as reference. Information on ascertained infection by SARS-CoV-2, admission to hospital, admission to ICU and mortality in the period from February 21 to July 31, 2020 were retrieved from the regional registry of COVID-19. Subjects with ascertained diabetes were 269,830 (55.2% men; median age 72 years). Reference subjects were 4,681,239 (men 48.6%, median age 46 years). Ratios of age- and gender-standardized rates (RR) [95% CI] for ascertained infection, admission to hospital, admission to ICU and disease-related death in diabetic subjects were 1.31 [1.19–1.45], 2.11 [1.83–2.44], 2.45 [1.96–3.07], 1.87 [1.68–2.09], all p < 0.001. The highest RR of ascertained infection was observed in diabetic men aged 20–39 years: 1.90 [1.04–3.21]. The highest RR of ICU admission and death were observed in diabetic men aged 40–59 years: 3.47 [2.00–5.70] and 5.54 [2.23–12.1], respectively.ConclusionsThese data, observed in a large population of ∼5 million people of whom ∼250,000 with diabetes, show that diabetes not only conveys a poorer outcome in COVID-19 but also confers an increased risk of ascertained infection from SARS-CoV-2. Men of young or mature age have the highest relative risks.     

Clinical characteristics of liver injury in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant- and Omicron subvariant-infected patients

Introduction and ObjectivesLiver injury in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant- and Omicron subvariant-infected patients is unknown at present, and the aim of this study is to summarize liver injury in these patients.Patients and MethodsIn this study, 460 SARS-CoV-2-infected patients were enrolled. Five severe or critical patients were excluded, and 34 patients were also excluded because liver injury was not considered to be related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Liver injury was compared between Omicron and non-Omicron variants- and between Omicron subvariant-infected patients; additionally, the clinical data related to liver injury were also analyzed.ResultsAmong the 421 patients enrolled for analysis, liver injury was detected in 76 (18.1%) patients, including 46 Omicron and 30 non-Omicron variant-infected patients. The ratios did not differ between Omicron and non-Omicron variant-, Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 subvariant-infected patients (P>0.05). The majority of abnormal parameters of liver function tests were mildly elevated (1-3 × ULN), the most frequently elevated parameter of liver function test was γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT, 9.5%, 40/421), and patients with cholangiocyte or biliary duct injury markers were higher than with hepatocellular injury markers. Multivariate analysis showed that age (>40 years old, OR=1.898, 95% CI=1.058–3.402, P=0.032), sex (male gender, OR=2.031, 95% CI=1.211–3.408, P=0.007), serum amyloid A (SAA) level (>10 mg/ml, OR=3.595, 95% CI=1.840–7.026, P<0.001) and vaccination status (No, OR=2.131, 95% CI=1.089–4.173, P=0.027) were independent factors related to liver injury.ConclusionsLiver injury does not differ between Omicron and non-Omicron variants or between Omicron subvariant-infected patients. The elevations of cholangiocyte or biliary duct injury biomarkers are dominant in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.     

Antibody responses to second doses of COVID-19 vaccination in lung cancer patients undergoing treatment

BackgroundSeveral reports have revealed that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection tends to have more severe outcomes in cancer patients. Although vaccination reduces the risk of severe disease, data on antibody titers achieved by vaccination is scarce in cancer patients.MethodsWe collected 79 blood samples (69 lung cancer patients and 10 control individuals) and conducted an anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay to compare the antibody titer achieved with current treatment. Sixty-eight patients (86%) received the BNT162 mRNA vaccine and 11 (14%) received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. They were categorized according to the current treatment: control individuals without cancer (cohort A), lung cancer patients who were treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy (cohort B), immunotherapy (cohort C), combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunotherapy (cohort D), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cohort E), and radiation therapy (cohort F).ResultsAmong 69 lung cancer patients (cohort B–F), 57 (83%) had adenocarcinoma, and 66 (96%) had advanced-stage cancer. In the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay, the antibody titer was significantly lower in lung cancer patients than in control individuals (p = 0.01). The median antibody titers were 161 AU/ml in control individuals and 59.9 AU/ml in lung cancer patients.ConclusionsAntibody titers after the second vaccination were lower in cancer patients than those in healthy individuals. Our findings provide essential information for understanding the benefits and necessity of additional vaccination to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in lung cancer patients.     

Registro Español de Ablación con Catéter. XX Informe Oficial de la Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2020)

Introduction and objectivesThis article reports the results of the 2020 Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry, a year marked by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.MethodsData were collected retrospectively through completion and return of a specific form by the participating centers.ResultsData from 97 centers (67 public, 30 private) were analyzed. A total of 15 169 ablation procedures were reported with a mean of 155 ± 117 and a median [interquartile range] of 115 [62-227]. Because of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, both procedures and participating centers markedly decreased (−3380 procedures, −18%) and there were 5 centers less than in 2019. The most common procedure continued to be atrial fibrillation ablation (4513; 30%), well ahead of the remaining substrates, followed by ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (3188; 21%), and intranodal re-entry tachycardia (2808; 18%). Ablation of these 3 substrates continued to form the bulk of the procedures. The total success rate was slightly lower than in previous years (88%) with a similar complication rate (n = 309; 2%) and mortality (n = 7; 0.04%). A total of 243 procedures were performed in pediatric patients (1.6%).ConclusionsThe Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry systematically and continuously reflects the national trajectory, which, in 2020, was markedly affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Although slightly lower than in previous years, the success rate remained high, with a low complication rate.Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en     

Too Little of a Good Thing: Strong Associations Between Cardiac Size and Fitness Among Women

BackgroundCardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with functional impairment and cardiac events, particularly heart failure (HF). However, the factors predisposing women to low CRF and HF remain unclear.ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the association between CRF and measures of ventricular size and function and to examine the potential mechanism linking these factors.MethodsA total of 185 healthy women aged >30 years (51 ± 9 years) underwent assessment of CRF (peak volume of oxygen uptake [Vo₂peak]) and biventricular volumes at rest and during exercise by using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The relationships among Vo₂peak, cardiac volumes, and echocardiographic measures of systolic and diastolic function were assessed using linear regression. The effect of cardiac size on cardiac reserve (change in cardiac function during exercise) was assessed by comparing quartiles of resting left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV).ResultsVo₂peak was strongly associated with resting measures of LVEDV and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (R² = 0.58-0.63; P < 0.0001), but weakly associated with measures of resting left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function (R² = 0.01-0.06; P < 0.05). Increasing LVEDV quartiles were positively associated with cardiac reserve, with the smallest quartile showing the smallest reduction in LV end-systolic volume (quartile [Q]1: −4 mL vs Q4: −12 mL), smallest augmentation in LV stroke volume (Q1: +11 mL vs Q4: +20 mL) and cardiac output (Q1: +6.6 L/min vs Q4: +10.3 L/min) during exercise (interaction P < 0.001 for all).ConclusionsA small ventricle is strongly associated with low CRF because of the combined effect of a smaller resting stroke volume and an attenuated capacity to increase with exercise. The prognostic implications of low CRF in midlife highlight the need for further longitudinal studies to determine whether women with small ventricles are predisposed to functional impairment, exertional intolerance, and HF later in life.     

Registro español de ablación con catéter. XXI informe oficial de la Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2021)

Introduction and objectivesThe results of the 2021 Spanish catheter ablation registry are presented.MethodsData collection was carried out retrospectively by filling in and sending a specific form by the participating centers.ResultsData from 93 centers (65 public, 28 private) were analyzed. A total of 17941 ablation procedures were reported with a mean of 193 ± 133 clases per centre. Recovery of activity from SARS-CoV-2 pandemic lockdown has led to a notable increase in the number of procedures (+2772 procedures, +18%) despite a small decrease in participating centers (4 centers less than in 2020). Atrial fibrillation ablation continues to be the leading procedure, with 5848 procedures (32,6%). Together with ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (3766; 21%) and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (3132; 17,5%) they constitute the 3 most frequently approached substrates. The total success rate reported (94%) is similar to previous years with a similar rate of complications (2%) and mortality (0.07). A total of 401 procedures were performed in pediatric patients (3,8%).ConclusionsThe Spanish catheter ablation registry systematically and continuously collects the national activity, which has recovered significantly from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic impact in 2020. Success rate for 2021 remains high, with a low complication rate.     

Screening of Potential Cardiac Involvement in Competitive Athletes Recovering From COVID-19: An Expert Consensus Statement

As our understanding of the complications of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) evolve, subclinical cardiac pathology such as myocarditis, pericarditis, and right ventricular dysfunction in the absence of significant clinical symptoms represents a concern. The potential implications of these findings in athletes are significant given the concern that exercise, during the acute phase of viral myocarditis, may exacerbate myocardial injury and precipitate malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Such concerns have led to the development and publication of expert consensus documents aimed at providing guidance for the evaluation of athletes after contracting COVID-19 in order to permit safe return to play. Cardiac imaging is at the center of these evaluations. This review seeks to evaluate the current evidence regarding COVID-19–associated cardiovascular disease and how multimodality imaging may be useful in the screening and clinical evaluation of athletes with suspected cardiovascular complications of infection. Guidance is provided with diagnostic “red flags” that raise the suspicion of pathology. Specific emphasis is placed on the unique challenges posed in distinguishing athletic cardiac remodeling from subclinical cardiac disease. The strengths and limitations of different imaging modalities are discussed and an approach to return to play decision making for athletes post–COVID-19, as informed by multimodality imaging, is provided.     

Registro Español de Marcapasos. XVIII Informe Oficial de la Sección de Estimulación Cardiaca de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2020)

Introduction and objectivesThis report describes the cardiac pacing activity performed in Spain in 2020, including the number and type of implanted devices, demographic and clinical factors, and data on remote monitoring.MethodsInformation consisted of the European Pacemaker Patient Card, data submitted to the cardiodispositivos.es online platform, the databases of participating centers, and supplier-reported data.ResultsA total of 14 662 procedures were registered from 102 hospitals, representing 39.2% of the estimated activity. The implantation rates of conventional and low-energy resynchronization pacemakers were 759 and 31 units per million population, respectively. In all, 520 leadless pacemakers were implanted, 70 with atrioventricular synchrony. The mean age at implantation was high (78.8 years), and the most frequent electrocardiographic change was atrioventricular block. There was a predominance of dual-chamber pacing mode but VVI/R single-chamber pacing was used in 19% of patients in sinus rhythm, depending on age and sex. Remote monitoring capability was present in 18.5% of implanted conventional pacemakers and 45.6% of low-energy resynchronization pacemakers, although registration in this system increased by 53% in 2020.ConclusionsIn 2020, in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the number of implanted conventional pacemakers decreased by 8% and cardiac resynchronization therapy by 4.6%. The number of leadless pacemakers increased by 16.5%. Sequential pacing was predominant, influenced by age and sex. Home monitoring played a fundamental role as a mode of follow-up in this SARS-CoV-2 pandemic year.Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en     

Differential white blood cell count in the COVID-19: A cross-sectional study of 148 patients

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 infection alters various blood parameters, which may indicate disease severity and thus help in better clinical management.AimTo study the association between various hematological parameters and disease severity of COVID-19. To analyze the effects of hypertension and diabetes on neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-monocyte ratio in patients suffering from COVID-19.Materials and methodsThe study was a cross-sectional study involving 148 laboratory-confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patients were divided into three groups on the basis of disease severity. Various hematological parameters were analyzed. The effects of hypertension and diabetes on NLR and NMR in COVID-19 patients were evaluated.ResultsOf the 148 patients, 78.4%, 8.1% and 13.5% cases were in the mild, moderate and severe groups, respectively. Mean age was 42.63 ± 16.04 years (IQR: 29, 54.75; Range: 7–74). 58.8% patients were male while the rest (42.2%) were female. Mean TLC (cells/mm³), neutrophil (%), lymphocyte (%), monocyte (%), eosinophil (%), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR) among mild, moderate and severe COVID-19 was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Basophil (%) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) was statistically insignificant among the three groups. Lymphocyte (%), monocyte (%) and eosinophil (%) were negatively correlated to disease severity. Among diabetics, both NLR and NMR were statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, among hypertensive cases, only the NLR was statistically significant.ConclusionOlder age, higher TLC, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, eosinopenia, high NLR and high NMR are associated with severe COVID-19. High NLR and high NMR are indicative of severe disease among diabetic patients. High NLR also indicates severe disease among hypertensive patients.     

Acute Cardiac Events During COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations

BackgroundCOVID-19 is associated with cardiac complications.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with acute cardiac events during COVID-19-associated hospitalizations among adults.MethodsDuring January 2021 to November 2021, medical chart abstraction was conducted on a probability sample of adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection identified from 99 U.S. counties in 14 U.S. states in the COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network. We calculated the prevalence of acute cardiac events (identified by International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision-Clinical Modification codes) by history of underlying cardiac disease and examined associated risk factors and disease outcomes.ResultsAmong 8,460 adults, 11.4% (95% CI: 10.1%-12.9%) experienced an acute cardiac event during a COVID-19-associated hospitalization. Prevalence was higher among adults who had underlying cardiac disease (23.4%; 95% CI: 20.7%-26.3%) compared with those who did not (6.2%; 95% CI: 5.1%-7.6%). Acute ischemic heart disease (5.5%; 95% CI: 4.5%-6.5%) and acute heart failure (5.4%; 95% CI: 4.4%-6.6%) were the most prevalent events; 0.3% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.5%) experienced acute myocarditis or pericarditis. Risk factors varied by underlying cardiac disease status. Patients with ≥1 acute cardiac event had greater risk of intensive care unit admission (adjusted risk ratio: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.8-2.1) and in-hospital death (adjusted risk ratio: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3-2.1) compared with those who did not.ConclusionsAcute cardiac events were common during COVID-19-associated hospitalizations, particularly among patients with underlying cardiac disease, and are associated with severe disease outcomes. Persons at greater risk for experiencing acute cardiac events during COVID-19-associated hospitalizations might benefit from more intensive clinical evaluation and monitoring during hospitalization.     

Prospective Case-Control Study of Cardiovascular Abnormalities 6 Months Following Mild COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to detect cardiovascular changes after mild severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 infection.BackgroundConcern exists that mild coronavirus disease 2019 may cause myocardial and vascular disease.MethodsParticipants were recruited from COVIDsortium, a 3-hospital prospective study of 731 health care workers who underwent first-wave weekly symptom, polymerase chain reaction, and serology assessment over 4 months, with seroconversion in 21.5% (n = 157). At 6 months post-infection, 74 seropositive and 75 age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched seronegative control subjects were recruited for cardiovascular phenotyping (comprehensive phantom-calibrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance and blood biomarkers). Analysis was blinded, using objective artificial intelligence analytics where available.ResultsA total of 149 subjects (mean age 37 years, range 18 to 63 years, 58% women) were recruited. Seropositive infections had been mild with case definition, noncase definition, and asymptomatic disease in 45 (61%), 18 (24%), and 11 (15%), respectively, with 1 person hospitalized (for 2 days). Between seropositive and seronegative groups, there were no differences in cardiac structure (left ventricular volumes, mass, atrial area), function (ejection fraction, global longitudinal shortening, aortic distensibility), tissue characterization (T₁, T₂, extracellular volume fraction mapping, late gadolinium enhancement) or biomarkers (troponin, N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide). With abnormal defined by the 75 seronegatives (2 SDs from mean, e.g., ejection fraction <54%, septal T₁ >1,072 ms, septal T₂ >52.4 ms), individuals had abnormalities including reduced ejection fraction (n = 2, minimum 50%), T₁ elevation (n = 6), T₂ elevation (n = 9), late gadolinium enhancement (n = 13, median 1%, max 5% of myocardium), biomarker elevation (borderline troponin elevation in 4; all N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide normal). These were distributed equally between seropositive and seronegative individuals.ConclusionsCardiovascular abnormalities are no more common in seropositive versus seronegative otherwise healthy, workforce representative individuals 6 months post–mild severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 infection.     

Hybrid Cardiac Magnetic Resonance/Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Differentiate Active From Chronic Cardiac Sarcoidosis

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of simultaneous hybrid cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detection and differentiation of active (aCS) from chronic (cCS) cardiac sarcoidosis.BackgroundLate gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR and FDG-PET are both established imaging techniques for the detection of CS. However, there are limited data regarding the value of a comprehensive simultaneous hybrid CMR/FDG-PET imaging approach that includes CMR mapping techniques.MethodsForty-three patients with biopsy-proven extracardiac sarcoidosis (median age: 48 years, interquartile range: 37-57 years, 65% male) were prospectively enrolled for evaluation of suspected CS. After dietary preparation for suppression of myocardial glucose metabolism, patients were evaluated on a 3-T hybrid PET/MR scanner. The CMR protocol included T1 and T2 mapping, myocardial function, and LGE imaging. We assumed aCS if PET and CMR (ie, LGE or T1/T2 mapping) were both positive (PET+/CMR+), cCS if PET was negative but CMR was positive (PET?/CMR+), and no CS if patients were CMR negative regardless of PET findings.ResultsAmong the 43 patients, myocardial glucose uptake was suppressed successfully in 36 (84%). Hybrid CMR/FDG-PET revealed aCS in 13 patients (36%), cCS in 5 (14%), and no CS in 18 (50%). LGE was present in 14 patients (39%); T1 mapping was abnormal in 10 (27%) and T2 mapping abnormal in 2 (6%). CS was diagnosed based on abnormal T1 mapping in 4 out of 18 CS patients (22%) who were LGE negative. PET FDG uptake was present in 17 (47%) patients.ConclusionsComprehensive simultaneous hybrid CMR/FDG-PET imaging is useful for the detection of CS and provides additional value for identifying active disease. Our results may have implications for enhanced diagnosis as well as improved identification of patients with aCS in whom anti-inflammatory therapy may be most beneficial.