超声引导介入性治疗细菌性肝脓肿的临床研究

目的探讨细菌性肝脓肿的超声引导下介入治疗效果。方法对在我院接受诊断与治疗的细菌性肝脓肿96患者进行超声检查及超声引导介入治疗。结果典型的超声表现为肝内不规则的圆形无回声或低回声包块,包膜光滑完整。脓腔的平均直径为(8.12±4.31)cm,其中脓肿直径5cm 51例,脓肿直径≥5cm 45例。细针抽吸组和置管引流组中脓肿直径≥5cm患者经过治疗后随访3个月,其中细针抽吸组中治愈21例,治愈率为95.45%;置管引流组中治愈22例,治愈率为95.65%;经统计学分析发现细针抽吸组和置管引流组中脓肿直径≥5cm患者的治愈率比较无明显差异。细针抽吸组和置管引流组中脓肿直径5cm患者经过治疗后随访3个月,其中细针抽吸组中治愈22例,治愈率为100.00%;置管引流组中治愈23例,治愈率为100.00%;经统计学分析发现细针抽吸组和置管引流组中脓肿直径5cm患者的治愈率比较无明显差异。结论超声引导经皮穿刺组织活检能快速明确肝脓肿诊断,对于直径≥5cm直径5cm的细菌性肝脓肿应分别首选超声引导下经皮肝穿刺置管引流术、细针抽吸术等介入性治疗方法简单、安全可靠。     

超声引导经皮肝穿刺引流术治疗细菌性肝脓肿

 目的 评价超声引导经皮肝穿刺引流术在细菌性肝脓肿治疗中的临床应用价值.方法 对35例超声引导下经皮肝穿刺引流(穿刺组)和同期36例手术切开引流(手术组)治疗细菌性肝脓肿的疗效进行对照分析.结果 穿刺组治愈率(97.1 %)与手术组治愈率(94.4%)差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),而穿刺组在住院天数、术后血象恢复正常时间、术后体温恢复正常时间、脓腔消失时间、治疗费用方面明显优于手术组(P＜0.01),术后并发症在穿刺组明显少于手术组(P＜0.05). 结论与传统手术切开引流术相比,经皮肝穿刺引流术具有安全、微创、简便、康复快和经济等优点,可以作为细菌性肝脓肿首选治疗方法.     

超声引导下经皮穿刺抽吸或置管治疗细菌性肝脓肿疗效比较

目的 比较超声引导下穿刺抽吸或置管引流对细菌性肝脓肿的疗效。方法 回顾性分析我院1994-01至2013-01收治的经超声引导下穿刺抽吸或置管引流的细菌性肝脓肿96例,分别比较两组患者之间的治疗成功率、并发症率、病死率及住院时间。结果 分别有42例及54例行穿刺抽吸及置管引流治疗,两组间并发症率（4.8%vs 5.6%,P=1.00）、病死率（2.3%vs 1.9%,P=1.00）及住院时间[（19.1±12.1）d vs（21.6±12.5）d,P=0.44]差异无统计学意义。置管引流组治疗成功率显著高于抽吸组（61.9%vs 92.6%,P=0.00）,但对于脓腔直径≤6 cm者,治疗成功率无明显区别（91.0%vs 96.7%,P=0.57）。结论 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流治疗肝脓肿优于穿刺抽吸,对于直径≤6 cm者,穿刺抽吸是可选择的替代手段。     

CT引导下经皮肝脓肿穿刺置管引流术的应用

目的观察CT引导下经皮肝脓肿穿刺置管引流治疗肝脓肿的疗效和临床应用价值。方法对临床诊断明确并经实验室及影像学检查证实的36例患者在CT引导下经皮肝脓肿穿刺引流,术中置管,术后定时冲洗并积极进行有效的抗生素治疗。结果 36例肝脓肿患者经皮穿刺置管引流术治疗后,临床症状消失,无并发症发生,经B型超声或CT复查脓肿消失,全部治愈出院。结论 CT引导下经皮肝脓肿穿刺置管引流术具有操作简便、手术创伤小、住院费用低、疗效肯定等优点,是临床治疗肝脓肿的有效方法之一。     

超声引导穿刺置管引流治疗肝脓肿的临床应用及护理

目的:探讨了超声引导经皮穿刺置管引流冲洗与直接冲洗治疗肝脓肿的临床应用价值及护理。方法:对52例肝脓肿患者,63个病灶行超声引导经皮穿刺,小于5cm的脓肿直接穿刺抽吸治疗,大于5cm的肝脓肿置管引流。同时做好术前准备,全身支持营养,心理护理。临床应用效果良好。结果:52例患者的63个病灶完全治愈,穿刺术后24小时无不良反应,4周治愈率达到78%,8周治愈率达到83%,6个月治愈率达到100%,无护理并发症。结论:超声引导经皮穿刺置管引流抽吸冲洗治疗肝脓肿,方法简单,安全有效,创伤小,可取代外科手术治疗肝脓肿。细致周到的护理是治疗成功的重要保证。     

超声引导下肝脓肿介入治疗的临床研究

目的 :比较超声引导下针刺抽吸术与置管引流术在肝脓肿治疗中的优劣。方法 :将 30例肝脓肿患者随机分组 ,针刺抽吸组 15例 ,置管引流组 15例 ,针刺抽吸组最多行两次抽吸 ,第二次抽吸失败后改为量管引流 ,此类患者不包括在置管引流组。观察比较两组患者治疗结果、住院天数及并发症等 ,每 3天行超声检查。结果 :针刺抽吸组有效率6 6 6 7% ,置管引流组有效率 10 0 % ,有效治愈患者中 ,两种方法临床进展 (局部症状及体征缓解、体温下降、白细胞数正常 )所需平均时间及住院平均天数相似 (P >0 0 5 ) ,尽管针刺抽吸组脓腔直径由原来减小 5 0 %所需时间明显多于置管引流组 (13天 /6天 ) (P 0 0 5 ) ,但两组患者脓腔完全或近乎完全消失所需平均时间相似 (P >0 0 5 ) ,两组患者都未见主要并发症。结论 :从脓腔缩小 5 0 %所需时间及有效率来说 ,置管引流较针刺抽吸更有效。     

超声造影联合超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流术治疗肝脓肿的应用价值

目的探讨超声造影联合超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流术治疗肝脓肿的临床效果。方法选择本院2015年1月～2019年4月收治的39例肝脓肿患者,随机分为实验组20例和对照组19例。实验组穿刺前行超声造影检查,对穿刺点及引流管放置区进行精准定位。对照组在常规超声引导下行经皮穿刺置管引流。比较两组患者治愈率、体温恢复时间、白细胞计数恢复时间、引流管拔除时间、住院时间、术中及术后并发症等,进行对比分析。结果 39例患者均行超声引导下穿刺置管引流治疗,所有患者均一次性穿刺成功,术中无出血、周围脏器损伤、肝破裂以及胆漏等并发症。实验组患者体温及白细胞复常时间、引流管拔除时间、住院时间均显著短于对照组,两者差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组治愈率及术后并发症比较无统计学意义。结论超声造影能准确评估病灶液化坏死区域,在精准引导、定位超声引导下肝脓肿穿刺置管引流中有着绝对优势,值得临床推广应用。     

介入性超声治疗肝脓肿39例

肝脓肿传统治疗方法是大剂量抗生素和外科手术引流。近年来,国内外已有应用介入性超声治疗肝脓肿的报告［１～２］。介入性超声治疗包括超声引导经皮肝穿刺抽吸术和置管引流术。该方法与传统治疗比较,有操作简单、经济安全、创伤小、并发症少、疗效好等优点。近５ａ来,...     

超声引导经皮穿刺治疗乳腺脓肿的临床应用

目的评价超声引导下经皮穿刺治疗乳腺脓肿的临床应用价值。方法在超声引导下,对诊断为乳腺脓肿的病人采用经皮穿刺脓肿抽吸法及脓腔置管引流法进行治疗。结果 45例病人共有54个脓肿,22个最大径≤3 cm的脓肿采用脓肿抽吸法治愈21例,1例改行脓腔置管引流后治愈;32个最大径>3 cm的脓肿实施脓腔置管引流法,治愈30例,切开引流2例。随访41例,复发4例,2例再次行脓腔置管引流治愈,另2例行脓肿切开引流治愈。结论超声引导下穿刺抽吸治疗不超过3 cm的乳腺脓肿与置管引流治疗超过3 cm的乳腺脓肿均是有效的治疗手段。     

CT引导下肝脓肿穿刺置管引流术的探讨

目的 探讨CT引导下肝脓肿穿刺引流术的方法和疗效.方法 本组20例肝脓肿患者,均经临床、生化和影像学(CT)检查确诊为肝脓肿,行CT引导下定位穿刺抽吸并置管引流.脓肿位于肝左叶6例,肝右叶9例,肝2叶5例.结果 14例为单个脓肿,6例为多发脓肿,单个脓肿经1次抽吸后脓肿完全消失9例,1例经2次抽吸基本消失,多发或多房脓肿穿刺先抽较大脓肿,后抽较小脓肿,或分次抽吸,20例均放置引流管并冲洗,平均引流置管时间为19.2 d,所有患者至随访截止日未见复发.结论 CT引导下穿刺抽吸引流足治疗肝脓肿的非常有效的方法.     

细菌性肝脓肿高危因素的多元回归分析

目的　确定近年细菌性肝脓肿治疗结果和与死亡有关的高危因素。方法　对 95例细菌性肝脓肿资料采用单因素和多元回归分析。结果　 71例采用经皮肝穿刺引流 (PCD) ,6 8例治愈 ;13例肝部分切除术加胆肠吻合均治愈 ;12例 (含穿刺引流失败后开腹引流 1例 )接受开腹引流 ,术后死亡 4例。黄疸、感染性休克、多发性脓肿、继发于恶性肿瘤、手术引流等与预后不良有关。低白蛋白血症、凝血酶原时间延长、胆红素、丙氨酸转氨酶、尿素氮、肌酐增高等是死亡率增加的独立高危因素。结论　PCD具有创伤小和预后好等优点 ,尤其适用于有各种高危因素的病人。局限于肝脏某一部位的胆源性肝脓肿 ,肝部分切除可获得良好效果。开腹引流的费用和死亡率较高 ,临床应用逐渐减少。单纯抗生素治疗对于具有高危因素的细菌性肝脓肿很少能取得满意效果     

Percutaneous treatment of large pyogenic liver abscess

Surgical drainage has been the traditional mode of treatment of pyogenic liver abscess but this was replaced by IV broad-spectrum antibiotics and imaging-guided percutaneous drainage either via needle aspiration or percutaneous catheter drainage (CD). There is a debate about which is better intermittent needle aspiration or CD.     

CT引导下肝脓肿引流的围手术期护理及随访

目的探讨在CT引导下肝脓肿穿刺引流术患者的有效护理方法。 方法：对118例确诊为肝脓肿的患者做好CT引导下穿刺引流术前护理,每日用抗生素反复冲洗,观察引流液的情况,直至脓腔消失,拔除引流管。 结果118例肝脓肿患者,其中114例均影像学检查,脓腔消失,脓肿明显消失,体温正常,痊愈出院。 结论周密细致的护理工作对CT引导穿刺引流治疗肝脓肿患者的治疗起到关键性的作用。     

Pyogenic liver abscess: Treatment with needle aspiration

Objective:

Percutaneous needle aspiration as an alternative to continuous percutaneous catheter drainage in combination with systemic antibiotics for the treatment of pyogenic liver abscess has never been popular. The authors report their experience with needle aspiration and evaluate its safety, effectiveness and role in treating pyogenic liver abscess.

Materials and Methods:

The results of needle aspiration performed in 101 liver abscesses of 64 unselected consecutive patients with male to female ratio of 2.5:1 and average age 56.3 ± 16 years were reviewed. The abscesses were pyogenic in 63 patients (98.4%), and multiple in 18 patients (28.1%). Thirty-nine abscesses (38.6%) were ≥ 5 cm in diameter. Complete pus removal from each abscess was attempted with 18 gauge thin-walled trocar needles and ultrasound guidance.

Results:

The percentage of abscesses requiring one, two and three, or more sessions of aspiration was 49.5%, 23.7% and 26.7%, respectively. The overall success rate was 96.8%. The success rate was unrelated to the largest size or number of abscess in the patient. Two patients died from uncontrolled sepsis. One serious complication of liver laceration requiring laparotomy occurred.

Conclusion:

Percutaneous needle aspiration in combination with systemic antibiotics is safe and effective in treating pyogenic liver abscess, it should be considered as a first line alternative to catheter drainage, especially for multiple abscesses. The need for repeat aspirations follows a ‘fifty per cent rule’.     

分析肝脓肿介入治疗住院时间的影响因素

目的分析肝脓肿行经皮穿刺置管引流术的影响因素。 方法选择DSA引导下经皮肝穿刺置管引流并采用不同冲洗液冲洗脓腔治疗肝脓肿116例,进行资料分析,患者平均（59.98±16.73）岁,其中男性76例,女性40例。既往有糖尿病49例,无糖尿病67例;脓肿单发者48例,多发者68例;住院期间有并发症者104例,无并发症的12例。对穿刺液经行细菌培养,大肠杆菌阳性者20例,肺炎克雷白杆菌52例,其他致病菌8例,培养阴性36例。按冲洗液不同分为两组：A组,置管后先使用甲硝唑注射液冲洗,细菌培养及药敏结果明确后改用含敏感抗生素液体冲洗脓腔,共68例;B组,置管后全程使用甲硝唑冲洗,共48例。 结果116例肝脓肿患者治疗有效率100%。统计分析结果显示性别、有无并发症对住院时间影响的差异无统计学意义;年龄与住院时间无相关关系;糖尿病、脓肿数目及不同冲洗方法对住院时间的影响差异有统计学意义。 结论DSA引导下经皮肝穿刺置管引流冲洗治疗肝脓肿疗效确切,糖尿病是影响住院时间的重要因素;多发肝脓肿的住院时间较单发的明显延长;采用敏感抗生素溶液冲洗肝脓肿效果更显著。     

Image guided percutaneous splenic interventions

AIM: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of image-guided percutaneous splenic interventions as diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our interventional records from July 2001 to June 2006. Ninety-five image-guided percutaneous splenic interventions were performed after informed consent in 89 patients: 64 men and 25 women who ranged in age from 5 months to 71 years (mean, 38.4 years) under ultrasound (n=93) or CT (n=2) guidance. The procedures performed were fine needle aspiration biopsy of focal splenic lesions (n=78) and aspiration (n=10) or percutaneous catheter drainage of a splenic abscess (n=7). RESULTS: Splenic fine needle aspiration biopsy was successful in 62 (83.78%) of 74 patients with benign lesions diagnosed in 43 (58.1%) and malignancy in 19 (25.67%) patients. The most common pathologies included tuberculosis (26 patients, 35.13%) and lymphoma (14 patients, 18.91%). Therapeutic aspiration or pigtail catheter drainage was successful in all (100%) patients. There were no major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided splenic fine needle aspiration biopsy is a safe and accurate technique that can provide a definitive diagnosis in most patients with focal lesions in the spleen. This study also suggests that image-guided percutaneous aspiration or catheter drainage of splenic abscesses is a safe and effective alternative to surgery.