Incorporation of the SUVmax Measured From FDG PET and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio Improves Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe aim of the present study was to investigate the value of incorporation 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for improving prediction of clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (LA NSCLC).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 138 patients with unresectable LA NSCLC at our institution from July 2010 to August 2017. Spearman correlation analyses were used to estimate the correlations between SUVmax and NLR level. The univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic indicators, including the incorporation of SUVmax and NLR. We defined the SUVmax and NLR grade (SNG = 0, 1, or 2) score as the number of risk factors among (1) SUVmax > 11.95 and (2) NLR > 3.82. The SNG score prognostic value was evaluated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that tumor stage, SUVmax, SUVmean, NLR, and SNG score were significantly associated with OS and PFS in patients with LA NSCLC. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test demonstrated significant differences in both OS and PFS among patients in SNG score (OS, P < .001; PFS, P < .001). Spearman correlation analyses showed that SUVmax had a correlation with the NLR (r = 0.237; P = .005). In subgroup analyses for patients with tumor pathologic stage IIIA/IIIB, we found that the SNG score was significantly associated with OS and PFS in each subgroup (P < .001, P < .001 for OS and P = .027, P < .001 for PFS, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the SNG score was a significantly independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 1.612; 95% confidence interval, 1.157-2.246; P = .005) and PFS (hazard ratio, 2.241; 95% confidence interval, 1.486-3.379; P < .001).ConclusionIncorporation of the SUVmax and NLR improves prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with LA NSCLC.     

Four-Year Survival With Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC—an Update From the PACIFIC Trial

IntroductionIn the Phase 3, placebo-controlled PACIFIC trial of patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC without disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy, consolidative durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in the primary end points of overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53–0.87; p = 0.00251; data cutoff, March 22, 2018) and progression-free survival (PFS) (blinded independent central review; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) (HR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.42–65; p < 0.0001; February 13, 2017) with manageable safety. Here, we report updated analyses of OS and PFS, approximately 4 years after the last patient was randomized.MethodsPatients with WHO performance status of 0 or 1 (and any tumor programmed death-ligand 1 status) were randomized (2:1) to intravenous durvalumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo, administered every 2 weeks (≤12 months), stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. OS and PFS were analyzed using a stratified log-rank test in the intent-to-treat population. Medians and 4-year OS and PFS rates were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsOverall, 709 of 713 randomized patients received durvalumab (n/N=473/476) or placebo (n/N=236/237). As of March 20, 2020 (median follow-up = 34.2 months; range: 0.2–64.9), updated OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.57–0.88) and PFS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.44–0.67) remained consistent with the primary analyses. The median OS for durvalumab was reached (47.5 mo; placebo, 29.1 months). Estimated 4-year OS rates were 49.6% versus 36.3% for durvalumab versus placebo, and 4-year PFS rates were 35.3% versus 19.5% respectively.ConclusionThese updated exploratory analyses demonstrate durable PFS and sustained OS benefit with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy. An estimated 49.6% of patients randomized to durvalumab remain alive at 4 years (placebo, 36.3%), and 35.3% remain alive and progression-free (placebo, 19.5%).     

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Metastatic NSCLC in CheckMate 9LA: 3-Year Clinical Update and Outcomes in Patients With Brain Metastases or Select Somatic Mutations

IntroductionIn the phase 3 CheckMate 9LA study, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy alone. We report updated efficacy and safety (≥3 y of follow-up), clinical outcomes in patients with baseline brain metastases, and exploratory somatic mutation analyses.MethodsAdults with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, no known sensitizing EGFR or ALK alterations, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1 were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks with chemotherapy (two cycles) or chemotherapy alone (four cycles). Assessments included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate. Exploratory analyses included systemic and intracranial efficacy in patients with or without baseline brain metastases, in addition to OS and PFS by KRAS, TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 somatic mutation status in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.ResultsWith a minimum follow-up of 36.1 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to prolong OS versus chemotherapy alone in the intent-to-treat population (median [hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval] OS: 15.8 versus 11.0 mo [0.74; 0.62–0.87]; 3-y OS: 27% versus 19%). Efficacy outcomes were improved in patients with pretreated baseline brain metastases (median [hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval] OS: 19.3 versus 6.8 mo [0.45; 0.29–0.70]; systemic PFS: 9.7 versus 4.1 mo [0.44; 0.28–0.69]; intracranial PFS: 11.4 versus 4.6 mo [0.42; 0.26–0.68]). A trend of OS benefit was observed in patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, despite KRAS, TP53, and STK11 tumor mutations. Extended follow-up revealed no new safety signals.ConclusionsWith a 3-year minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy continued to have long-term, durable efficacy versus chemotherapy alone; a manageable safety profile; and survival benefit in patients with or without baseline brain metastases or select somatic mutations, further supporting the regimen as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC.     

PTEN Loss as a Predictor of Tumor Heterogeneity and Poor Prognosis in Patients With EGFR-mutant Advanced Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BackgroundRapid disease progression of patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been recently associated with tumor heterogeneity, which may be mirrored by coexisting concomitant alterations. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the correlation between loss of function of PTEN and the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in this population.Materials and MethodsArchival tumor blocks from patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were administered upfront tyrosine kinase inhibitors were retrospectively collected. The status of 4 genes (PTEN, TP53, c-MET, IGFR) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and it was correlated with overall response rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsFifty-one patients were included. In multivariate analysis, PTEN loss (hazard ratio [HR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-7.66; P = .002), IGFR overexpression (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.03-4.77; P = .04), liver metastases (HR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.46-8.65; P = .005), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 1 (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.04-6.34; P = .04) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. Patients with PTEN loss had a median PFS of 6 months (2-year PFS, 11.6%), whereas patients without PTEN loss had a median PFS of 18 months (2-year PFS, 43.6%) (log-rank P < .005). In the multivariate analysis, PTEN loss (HR, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.37-14.81; P < .005), liver metastases (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.06-6.51; P = .037), and ECOG PS ≥ 1 (HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.15-6.81; P = .024) were significantly associated with shorter OS. Patients with PTEN loss had a median OS of 6 months (2-year OS, 12.2%), whereas in patients without PTEN loss, OS was not reached (2-year OS, 63.9%) (log-rank P < .0005).ConclusionsA low-cost and reproducible immunohistochemistry assay for PTEN loss analysis represents a potential tool for identifying tumor heterogeneity in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.     

Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Nonsquamous NSCLC: Results From the Randomized Phase 3 IMpower132 Trial

IntroductionWe report the final results of the phase 3 IMpower132 study evaluating atezolizumab plus carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed (APP) in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.MethodsChemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR or ALK genetic alterations were randomized in a one-to-one ratio to receive four or six cycles of carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed (PP) or APP every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed alone. Co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsThe intention-to-treat population included 578 patients (APP, n = 292; PP, n = 286). At the primary PFS analysis (May 22, 2018; median follow-up, 14.8 mo), APP exhibited significant PFS improvement versus PP (median = 7.6 versus 5.2 mo, stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.72, p < 0.0001). OS for the APP group was numerically better but not statistically significant at the interim (May 22, 2018; median = 18.1 versus 13.6 mo, stratified HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.64–1.03, p = 0.0797) and final analyses (July 18, 2019; median = 17.5 versus 13.6 mo; stratified HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71–1.06, p = 0.1546). The OS and PFS results favored APP versus PP across subgroups. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 54.6% (APP) and 40.1% (PP) of patients; grade 5 treatment-related events occurred in 3.8% and 2.9%, respectively.ConclusionsIMpower132 met its co-primary PFS end point but not its co-primary OS end point, with numerical improvement for OS in the APP arm. APP had a manageable safety profile, with no new or unexpected safety signals identified.     

Real-World Efficacy of First-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and High PD-L1 Tumor Expression

BackgroundIn clinical trials, first-line treatment with pembrolizumab improved overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of ≥ 50%. However, data on the efficacy of this treatment between clinical trials and actual clinical practice are inconsistent.Patients and MethodsNinety-five patients with histologically diagnosed advanced or recurrent NSCLC and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of ≥ 50% who received pembrolizumab as first-line treatment were consecutively enrolled onto this multicenter retrospective study from February 2017 to December 2018. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. We assessed the objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and immune-related adverse events (irAE), and determined their associations with clinical characteristics.ResultsThe objective response rate was 40.0%. The median PFS was 6.1 months, and OS did not reach the median. Multivariate analyses revealed that nonadenocarcinoma histology (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.03; P = .015) and ≥ 3 metastatic sites (hazard ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-8.01; P < .001) were independently correlated with poor PFS. Patients with irAE and patients without interstitial lung disease had significantly longer PFS (14.0 and 4.9 months, respectively; P = .011) than patients without irAE or patients with interstitial lung disease.ConclusionThe outcome of patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab treatment was worse in those with nonadenocarcinoma and with a large number of metastatic sites. Patients with irAE and without interstitial lung disease had a more favorable outcome.     

18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing heterogeneous metabolic response between primary tumor and metastases and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionThis study aimed to use ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and/or computed tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET/CT) imaging to evaluate the heterogeneous metabolic response between primary tumor and metastases in NSCLC after therapy and explored its correlation with prognosis.MethodsThe data of patients with NSCLC who underwent ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT before and after treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Heterogeneous metabolic response (HR), defined as the difference in metabolic response between any metastases and primary lesion, was evaluated using ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT. And the correlation between HR and clinical prognosis was also analyzed.ResultsA total of 56 patients with NSCLC including 56 primary lesions and 491 metastases were enrolled in the study. 46.4% (26/56) of patients had HR, especially in patients with stage IV disease and whose metastases with high metabolic burden. HR was significantly correlated with poorer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < .001 and P = .045, respectively). The multivariate analysis suggested that HR was an unfavorable independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 4.36; 95% CI, 2.00–9.49; P < .001) but not for PFS (P = .469). HR between lymph node metastases was correlated with shorter OS (P < .001) but not with PFS (P = .370).ConclusionHR was observed between primary and metastatic lesions in NSCLC after treatment using PET/CT. HR is significantly associated with poor prognosis and is an independent prognostic factor for OS.     

Progression-Free and Overall Survival for Concurrent Nivolumab With Standard Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Stage IIIA-B NSCLC: Results From the European Thoracic Oncology Platform NICOLAS Phase II Trial (European Thoracic Oncology Platform 6-14)

IntroductionThe NICOLAS study is the first completed single-arm phase II trial in stage III NSCLC evaluating hierarchically first the safety and then the efficacy of adding nivolumab concurrently to standard definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The safety end point was reported earlier; here, we present the efficacy results.MethodsStage IIIA-B unresectable treatment-naive patients with NSCLC received three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy (66 Gy, 33 fractions), along with nivolumab (360 mg, 3-weekly). Nivolumab was continued as monotherapy consolidation for a maximum of 1 year (480 mg, 4-weekly). The primary end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), with a target improvement compared with historical data of at least 15%, from 45% to 60%. To test this efficacy hypothesis, a sample size of 74 assessable patients provided a power of 83% with a one-sided alpha of 5%.ResultsA total of 79 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 21.0 months (interquartile range: 15.8–25.8 mo) for the primary PFS analysis. A total of 35.4% of the patients had stage IIIA, and 63.3% had stage IIIB disease. The 1-year PFS was 53.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.0%–64.0%) and the median PFS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 10.1–22.8 mo). Because 37 PFS events occurred in the first year posttreatment among the first 74 assessable patients, a 1-year PFS rate of at least 45% could not be rejected (p = 0.23). At an extended follow-up (median 32.6 mo), 37 deaths have been recorded, with a median overall survival (OS) of 38.8 months (95% CI: 26.8 mo–not estimable) and a 2-year OS rate of 63.7% (95% CI: 51.9%–73.4%). The OS of patients with stage IIIA disease was found to be significantly higher than patients with stage IIIB disease, with a 2-year OS of 81% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.037).ConclusionsPFS and OS are arithmetically higher in studies involving the same population. However, on the basis of the formal hierarchical efficacy analysis, we could not reject that the 1-year PFS rate is at least 45%.     

Metabolic tumor volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients treated definitively for non-small-cell lung cancer

PurposeFluorine-18 flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging has rapidly become the standard of care for staging patients with lung cancer. We evaluated the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV), a measure of tumor burden on FDG-PET imaging, in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated definitively.Methods and MaterialsA retrospective review identified 61 patients with NSCLC who underwent FDG-PET imaging for pretreatment staging. Metabolically active tumor regions were segmented on the PET scans semiautomatically to calculate the total body MTV. We determined the relationship of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with MTV in the entire cohort, and in the subgroup treated definitively.ResultsThe estimated median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 11.1 months and 18.9 months. Higher MTV was significantly associated with worse OS (P = 0.00075) and PFS (P = 0.00077). For definitively treated patients, when MTV was analyzed as a binary value above or below the median value, 2-year PFS was 60% versus 39.7% (median PFS 34.9 vs. 11.9 months) and 2-year OS was 79.7% versus 33.3% (median OS 41.9 vs. 18.9 months), respectively (log-rank P = 0.12 for PFS and P = 0.066 for OS). When MTV was analyzed as a continuous variable, multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated a trend to worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31; P = 0.12) and significantly worse OS (HR = 1.53; P = 0.018) with increasing MTV after controlling for known prognostic variables.ConclusionTumor burden as assessed by MTV yields prognostic information on survival beyond that of established prognostic factors in patients with NSCLC treated definitively.     

Impact of Radiotherapy on the Efficacy and Toxicity of anti-PD-1 Inhibitors in Metastatic NSCLC

BackgroundThe impact of radiotherapy (RT) on the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear.Materials and MethodsWe identified patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with the anti-programmed death 1 antibodies nivolumab or pembrolizumab between January 2016 and May 2019 at 3 tertiary centers, who were also treated with palliative RT either during or within 3 months of starting anti-programmed death 1 treatment. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment history were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and correlated with RT use.ResultsA total of 269 patients were identified, with a median follow-up of 19.4 months. The median age was 70 years (range, 35-90 years), and they were 63% male, 60% smokers, and 65% had adenocarcinoma histology. At the commencement of ICI treatment, the majority (86%) had ≥ 1 line of prior therapy and 34% had brain metastases. A total of 102 (38%) patients received RT within 3 months of starting ICI or subsequently during ICI treatment. Of patients that received RT, 86 (84%) received conventional hypofractionated RT, and, in the majority, 81 (79%) the intent of RT was symptom control. The use of RT did not increase grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events. The overall median PFS was 2.0 months (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.6 months) and the median OS was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval, 6.4-9.5 months). There were no significant differences in median PFS (3.0 vs. 2.0 months; P = .515) and median OS (9.0 vs. 9.0 months; P = .917) in the patients who received RT versus those that did not.ConclusionsIn patients with metastatic NSCLC, the addition of RT to ICI was not associated with increased toxicity or improved survival.     

Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Squamous NSCLC (IMpower131): Results From a Randomized Phase III Trial

IntroductionCytotoxic agents have immunomodulatory effects, providing a rationale for combining atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [anti–PD-L1]) with chemotherapy. The randomized phase III IMpower131 study (NCT02367794) evaluated atezolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy in stage IV squamous NSCLC.MethodsA total of 1021 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive atezolizumab+carboplatin+paclitaxel (A+CP) (n = 338), atezolizumab+carboplatin+nab-paclitaxel (A+CnP) (n = 343), or carboplatin+nab-paclitaxel (CnP) (n = 340) for four or six 21-day cycles; patients randomized to the A+CP or A+CnP arms received atezolizumab maintenance therapy until progressive disease or loss of clinical benefit. The coprimary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. The secondary end points included PFS and OS in PD-L1 subgroups and safety. The primary PFS (January 22, 2018) and final OS (October 3, 2018) for A+CnP versus CnP are reported.ResultsPFS improvement with A+CnP versus CnP was seen in the ITT population (median, 6.3 versus 5.6 mo; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–0.85; p = 0.0001). Median OS in the ITT population was 14.2 and 13.5 months in the A+CnP and CnP arms (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.73–1.05; p = 0.16), not reaching statistical significance. OS improvement with A+CnP versus CnP was observed in the PD-L1–high subgroup (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29–0.81), despite not being formally tested. Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events and serious adverse events occurred in 68.0% and 47.9% (A+CnP) and 57.5% and 28.7% (CnP) of patients, respectively.ConclusionsAdding atezolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in patients with first-line squamous NSCLC; OS was similar between the arms.     

Updated Overall Survival Data and Predictive Biomarkers of Sintilimab Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum as First-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC in the Phase 3 ORIENT-11 Study

IntroductionSintilimab plus chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy alone in nonsquamous NSCLC in the ORIENT-11 study. Updated overall survival (OS) and PFS data and corresponding biomarker analyses are reported here.MethodsIn this study, a total of 397 patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC were assigned to sintilimab plus chemotherapy combination treatment (combo) group or placebo plus chemotherapy treatment group. The patients were stratified by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels. Immune signature profiles from tumor RNA sequencing and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry were correlated with clinical outcome to identify predictive biomarkers.ResultsAs of January 2021, with median follow-up of 22.9 months, median OS was significantly improved in the combo group compared with the placebo plus chemotherapy treatment group (not reached versus 16.8 mo; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45–0.79, p = 0.0003). High or medium immune cell infiltration was strongly associated with improved PFS in the combo group, in contrast to absent or low immune cell infiltration, which suggests that chemotherapy could not prime “immune deserts” to obtain benefit from programmed cell death protein-1 inhibition. In particular, high major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II presentation pathway expression was significantly correlated with prolonged PFS (HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19–0.54, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20–0.64, p = 0.0005) in the combo group. Importantly, patients with low or absent PD-L1 but high MHC class II expression could still benefit from the combo treatment. In contrast, MHC class I antigen presentation pathway was less relevant in this combination setting.ConclusionsThe addition of sintilimab to chemotherapy resulted to significantly longer OS in nonsquamous NSCLC. Expression of MHC class II antigen presentation pathway could identify patients benefiting most from this combination.     

Negative association of antibiotics on clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced renal cell and non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundThe composition of gut microbiota affects antitumor immune responses, preclinical and clinical outcome following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer. Antibiotics (ATB) alter gut microbiota diversity and composition leading to dysbiosis, which may affect effectiveness of ICI.Patients and methodsWe examined patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 mAb monotherapy or combination at two academic institutions. Those receiving ATB within 30 days of beginning ICI were compared with those who did not. Objective response, progression-free survival (PFS) determined by RECIST1.1 and overall survival (OS) were assessed.ResultsSixteen of 121 (13%) RCC patients and 48 of 239 (20%) NSCLC patients received ATB. The most common ATB were β-lactam or quinolones for pneumonia or urinary tract infections. In RCC patients, ATB compared with no ATB was associated with increased risk of primary progressive disease (PD) (75% versus 22%, P < 0.01), shorter PFS [median 1.9 versus 7.4 months, hazard ratio (HR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–6.9, P < 0.01], and shorter OS (median 17.3 versus 30.6 months, HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1–10.8, P = 0.03). In NSCLC patients, ATB was associated with similar rates of primary PD (52% versus 43%, P = 0.26) but decreased PFS (median 1.9 versus 3.8 months, HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0–2.2, P = 0.03) and OS (median 7.9 versus 24.6 months, HR 4.4, 95% CI 2.6–7.7, P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, the impact of ATB remained significant for PFS in RCC and for OS in NSCLC.ConclusionATB were associated with reduced clinical benefit from ICI in RCC and NSCLC. Modulatation of ATB-related dysbiosis and gut microbiota composition may be a strategy to improve clinical outcomes with ICI.     

Gender Differences and Their Effects on Survival Outcomes in Lung Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AimsProgrammed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have had a major impact on the approach to care of patients with lung cancer. An important issue that is not known is whether they benefit men and women the same. We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine if clinical response and survival are influenced by gender.Materials and methodsA PubMed search was carried out to identify all randomised controlled trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with conventional chemotherapy in NSCLC. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed to assess overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) and whether there were differences in these outcomes between men and women.ResultsIn total, 12 studies with data for overall survival and 11 studies with data for PFS were included. Immunotherapy showed a statistically significant benefit over chemotherapy for overall survival (pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.65–0.81, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (pooled hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.54–0.72, P < 0.001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between men and women in terms of overall survival (males versus females: pooled hazard ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval = 0.66–0.83 versus pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.63–0.82, P = 0.709) or progression-free survival (males versus females: pooled hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval = 0.53–0.75 versus pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.58–0.88, P = 0.372).ConclusionThis is the first systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effect of gender and response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in patients solely with NSCLC. We examined 9270 and 6193 patients in terms of overall survival and PFS, respectively. Although there are significant biological differences between men's and women's immune responses, we have shown that these drugs offer the same survival benefit in patients with NSCLC regardless of gender.     

Allele Frequency–Adjusted Blood-Based Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictor of Overall Survival for Patients With NSCLC Treated With PD-(L)1 Inhibitors

IntroductionBlood-based tumor mutational burden (bTMB) has been studied to identify patients with NSCLC who would benefit from anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) or anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) therapies. However, it failed to predict overall survival (OS) benefits, which warrants further exploration.MethodsThree independent cohorts of patients with NSCLC treated with immunotherapy were used in this study. A new bTMB algorithm was first developed in the two independent cohorts (POPLAR, N = 211, and OAK, N = 462) and further validated in the third National Cancer Center (NCC) cohort (N = 64).ResultsbTMB-H (bTMB ≥ cutoff point) was not associated with favorable OS after immunotherapy regardless of the cutoff points in either the POPLAR and OAK or the NCC cohorts (p > 0.05) owing to its correlation with the amount of circulating tumor DNA, which was associated with poor OS. In the POPLAR and OAK cohorts, with allele frequency (AF) adjustment, a high AF bTMB (HAF-bTMB, mutation counts with an AF > 5%) was strongly correlated with the amount of circulating tumor DNA (Pearson r = 0.65), whereas a low AF bTMB (LAF-bTMB, mutation counts with an AF ≤ 5%) was not (Pearson r = 0.09). LAF-bTMB-H was associated with favorable OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52–0.95, p = 0.02), progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47–0.80, p < 0.001), and objective response rate (ORR) (p < 0.001) after immunotherapy but not chemotherapy, with a cutoff point of 12 trained in the POPLAR cohort and validated in the OAK cohort. The LAF-bTMB algorithm was further validated in the NCC cohort in which LAF-bTMB-H was associated with OS (HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.84, p = 0.02), PFS (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.70, p = 0.003), and ORR (p = 0.001).ConclusionsWe developed and validated a new LAF-bTMB algorithm as a feasible predictor of OS, PFS, and ORR after anti-PD-(L)1 therapies in patients with NSCLC, which needs to be prospectively validated.     

FDG-PET response and outcome from anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has resulted in impressive and durable clinical activity for many cancers including melanoma; however, there remain few reliable predictors for long-term response. This study investigated whether [¹⁸F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) imaging may better predict long-term outcomes compared with standard computed tomography (CT) response criteria.Patients and methodsRetrospective analysis of metastatic melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy with baseline and 1-year FDG-PET and CT imaging at Melanoma Institute Australia. One-year response was determined using RECIST for CT and EORTC criteria for PET, coded as complete response (CR or CMR), partial response (PR or PMR), stable disease (SD or SMD) or progressive disease (PD or PMD). Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined from the 1-year landmark.ResultsPatients (n = 104) were evaluated with median follow-up 30.1 months and 98% remain alive. Most received anti-PD-1 as monotherapy (67%) or combined with ipilimumab (31%). At 1 year, 28% had CR, 66% had PR and 6% had SD on CT, while 75% had CMR, 16% PMR and 9% SMD/PMD on PET. CMR was observed in 68% of patients with PR on CT. RECIST PFS post 1-year landmark was similar in patients with CR versus PR/SD, but improved in patients with CMR versus non-CMR {median not reached [NR] versus 12.8 month; hazard ratio [HR] 0.06 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02–0.23]; P < 0.01}. In patients with PR on CT, PFS was improved in patients with PR + CMR versus PR + non-CMR (median NR versus 12.8 months; HR 0.07 [95% CI 0.02–0.27]; P < 0.01). In the 78 CMR patients, 78% had discontinued treatment and 96% had ongoing response.ConclusionsWhilst only a small proportion of patients have a CR at 1 year, most patients with a PR have CMR on PET. Almost all patients with CMR at 1 year have ongoing response to therapy thereafter. PET may have utility in predicting long-term benefit and help guide discontinuation of therapy.     

Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed and bevacizumab versus pemetrexed monotherapy after induction therapy with carboplatin,pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesSingle agent maintenance therapy is widely accepted for advanced non-squamous non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is no consensus on the initial and maintenance phase regimens, and the clinical benefit of adding bevacizumab to cytotoxic drugs in the maintenance phase remains unclear.MethodsChemotherapy-naïve patients with non-squamous NSCLC were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with pemetrexed and bevacizumab or pemetrexed alone, after achieving disease control after four cycles of induction therapy with carboplatin (area under the curve = 6), pemetrexed (500 mg/m²), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg). The primary end-point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate.ResultsOne hundred ten patients were enrolled in the study, with 55 patients assigned to the two groups. The mean 1-year PFS rate was 43.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.6–59.2%) in the combination maintenance group and 35.2% (95% CI: 22.1–51.0%) in the pemetrexed maintenance group, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.433). Median PFS measured from enrolment was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.1–19.0) in the combination maintenance group and 7.3 months (95% CI: 5.7–14.1, hazard ratio: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.44–1.19, log-rank p = 0.198) in the pemetrexed maintenance group. Nasal haemorrhage, hypertension, and proteinuria were significantly more frequent in the combination maintenance group, but they were mild and tolerable.ConclusionBoth maintenance therapy with pemetrexed alone and pemetrexed and bevacizumab in combination were feasible in patients with non-squamous NSCLC who have achieved disease control after induction therapy with carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab. According to the selection design, differences in the superiority between these maintenance therapies were not demonstrated.     

A Nomogram for Predicting Progression-free Survival in Patients with Endometrial Cancer

AimsEndometrial cancer is one of the most widely known gynaecological malignancies that lacks a prognostic prediction model. This study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with endometrial cancer.Materials and methodsInformation for endometrial cancer patients diagnosed and treated from 1 January 2005 to 30 June 2018 was collected. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were carried out to determine the independent risk factors and a nomogram was constructed by R based on analytical factors. Internal and external validation were then carried out to predict the probability of 3- and 5-year PFS.ResultsIn total, 1020 patients with endometrial cancer were included in the study and the relationship between 25 factors and prognosis was analysed. Postmenopause (hazard ratio = 2.476, 95% confidence interval 1.023–5.994), lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio = 6.242, 95% confidence interval 2.815–13.843), lymphovascular space invasion (hazard ratio = 4.263, 95% confidence interval 1.802–10.087), histological type (hazard ratio = 2.713, 95% confidence interval 1.374–5.356), histological differentiation (hazard ratio = 2.601, 95% confidence interval 1.141–5.927) and parametrial involvement (hazard ratio = 3.596, 95% confidence interval 1.622–7.973) were found to be independent prognostic risk factors; these factors were selected to establish a nomogram. The consistency index for 3-year PFS were 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.81–0.95) in the training cohort and 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.87–0.99) in the verification set. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the 3- and 5-year PFS predictions are 0.891 and 0.842 in the training set; the same conclusion also appeared in the verification set [0.835 (3-year), 0.803(5-year)].ConclusionsThis study established a prognostic nomogram for endometrial cancer that provides a more individualised and accurate estimation of PFS for patients, which will help physicians make follow-up strategies and risk stratification.     

Brief Report: Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis From PACIFIC

IntroductionConsolidation durvalumab (the “PACIFIC regimen”) is standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who have not progressed after chemoradiotherapy, on the basis of data from the phase 3 placebo-controlled PACIFIC study (NCT02125461). Nevertheless, the benefit of immunotherapy in patients with stage III EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC is not well characterized. Here, we report a post hoc exploratory efficacy and safety analysis from a subgroup of patients with EGFRm NSCLC from the PACIFIC.MethodsPatients with stage III unresectable NSCLC and no progression after more than or equal to two cycles of platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy were randomized (2:1) to receive durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks [wk], for up to 1 y) or placebo; stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. Enrollment was not restricted by oncogenic driver gene mutation status or programmed death-ligand 1 expression. Patients with NSCLC with an EGFR mutation, determined by local testing only, were included in this subgroup analysis. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS; assessed by blinded independent central review) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response rate and safety. Statistical analyses for the subgroup of patients with EGFRm NSCLC were post hoc and considered exploratory.ResultsOf 713 patients randomized, 35 had locally confirmed EGFRm NSCLC (durvalumab, n = 24; placebo, n = 11). At data cutoff (January 11, 2021), median duration of follow-up for survival was 42.7 months (range: 3.7–74.3 mo) for all randomized patients in the subgroup. Median PFS was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3–20.7) with durvalumab versus 10.9 months (95% CI: 1.9–not evaluable [NE]) with placebo; hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.39–2.13). Median OS was 46.8 months (95% CI: 29.9–NE) with durvalumab versus 43.0 months (95% CI: 14.9–NE) with placebo; hazard ratio = 1.02 (95% CI: 0.39–2.63). The safety profile of durvalumab was generally consistent with the overall population and known profile for durvalumab.ConclusionsPFS and OS outcomes with durvalumab were similar to placebo for patients with EGFRm tumors, with wide CIs. These data should be interpreted with caution owing to small patient numbers and lack of a prospective study that evaluates clinical outcomes by tumor biomarker status. Further research to determine the optimal treatment for unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC is warranted.     

First-line bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: pooled and subgroup analyses of data from 2447 patients

BackgroundBevacizumab has consistently demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate when combined with first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the lack of a significant overall survival (OS) difference continues to attract debate, and identification of patients deriving greatest benefit from bevacizumab remains elusive.Patients and methodsIndividual patient data from three randomised phase III trials in the first-line HER2-negative mBC setting were analysed, focusing specifically on efficacy in poor-prognosis patients.ResultsThe meta-analysis (n = 2447) demonstrated a PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.71; median 9.2 months with bevacizumab versus 6.7 months with non-bevacizumab therapy) and response rate of 49% versus 32%, respectively. The OS HR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.86–1.08); median 26.7 versus 26.4 months, respectively. In patients with triple-negative mBC, the HRs for PFS and OS were 0.63 (95% CI 0.52–0.76) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.79–1.16), respectively. Median PFS was 8.1 months with bevacizumab versus 5.4 months with chemotherapy alone, median OS was 18.9 versus 17.5 months, respectively, and 1-year OS rates were 71% versus 65%.ConclusionsBevacizumab improves efficacy, including 1-year OS rates, both overall and in subgroups of poor-prognosis patients with limited treatment options.