Activity and tolerability of courses of intra-arterial chemotherapy followed by chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: We previously reported encouraging response rates and survival with combined intra-arterial (i.a.) chemotherapy and chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. We therefore evaluated a new program combining three courses of i.a. chemotherapy with chemoembolization administered every 28 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The treatment regimen consisted of L-leucovorin (100 mg/m2 i.v.), fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 i.a.), and carboplatin (250 mg/m2 i.a.). Chemoembolization with mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2) plus ethiodized oil and gelatin sponge was performed immediately after. The same treatment was given every 28 days for 3 times. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients entered the study and were assessable for response and side effects. There were 24 males and 4 females (median age, 68 yrs; range, 42-75). TNM stage was II-III in 20 and IVA in 8; 17 were Child's A and 11 Child's B. Baseline alpha-fetoprotein was elevated in 15, and there was cirrhosis in 23. Twelve patients had a partial response (43%; 95% confidence interval, 24-63%), 13 had stabilization, and 3 progressive disease. Median survival was 16.6 months (range, 2-24). Sixteen patients had grade I-II pain and 14 grade I-II fever. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the regimen is safe and well tolerated. Despite 43% objective remissions, our results do not seem better than those obtained with less intensive regimens.     

Prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma submitted to chemoembolization

The prognosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is poor. Encouraging response rates have been reported with chemoembolization, but no survival advantage has been demonstrated. Assessment of the impact of the treatment modality on prognosis is complicated by a poor understanding of the prognostic factors in the disease. We therefore evaluated, through univariate and multivariate analysis, the role on prognosis of 16 variables in 63 patients submitted to chemoembolization. Patients were treated with epirubicin (50 mg) plus ethiodized oil and gelatin sponge (22 cases) or with a new program combining i.a, chemotherapy with chemoembolization (41 cases) as follows: L-leucovorin, 100 mg/m(2) i.v.; fluorouracil, 800 mg/m(2) i.a.; carboplatin, 250 mg/m(2) i.a. Chemoembolization with mitoxantrone, 10 mg/m(2), plus ethiodized oil and gelatine sponge was performed immediately after. Median survival for the whole group of patients was 294 days. A multivariate analysis showed a highly significant influence on survival for Child's status (p=0.002) and for TNM stage (p=0.01). Median survival for patients with Child's A disease was 13.9 months and for patients with TNM stage I-II disease 19 months. In conclusion, our data suggest that patients with limited disease and adequate liver function have a longer survival after chemoembolization.     

A new chemoembolization protocol in refractory liver metastasis of colorectal cancer--a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION: In patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) refractory to systemic chemotherapy including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) / folinic acid (FA), oxaliplatin and irinotecan we assessed the feasibility, toxicity and response to hepatic transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). At the time of treatment, patients had exclusively or dominantly liver metastasis of CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The following protocol was applied via a selective transfemoral hepatic arterial approach: mitomycin C 5 mg/m(2), interferon-alpha2b 4.5 Mio IU, dexamethasone 20 mg mixed with Amilomer DSM 45/25 (Spherex((R))) days 1 and 2 i.a. (bolus), oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) (2 h) day 1 i.a., FA 500 mg/m(2) (2 h) day 1 i.v., and 5-FU 1.500 mg/m(2) (24 h) day 1 i.a. Cycles have been repeated at days 15-22. The dose was adjusted according to the pretreatment performance status and elevation of alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin and serum albumin. Treatment was continued until progression or emergence of intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: 11 patients received a total number of 43 TACE, with a range of 2-6 per patient. There was no TACE-related mortality. 4 patients died 5, 8, 10 and 11 months after initiation of treatment due to progression of disease. 7 patients are alive at 4+ (n = 2), 5+ (n = 1), 6+ (n = 1), 7+ (n = 1) and 11+ (n = 2) months after start of treatment. Toxicity (CTC) was mild with grade I-II asthenia (n = 10), grade I-II neurotoxicity (n = 5), grade II nausea and/or vomiting (n = 2) and grade II diarrhea (n = 1). Treatment had to be postponed due to grade I thrombocytopenia in 2 patients. No bleeding episodes or obvious infectious complications occurred during treatment intervals. 1 patient experienced an allergic reaction to oxaliplatin which led to exclusion from further therapy. Arterial catheter dislocation occurred in 3 patients. In 10 patients evaluable for response we observed 3 partial responses, 2 minor responses, and 4 times stable disease. Only 1 patient had further progression of disease under treatment. CONCLUSION: TACE, using a combination of mitomycin C, dexamethasone and interferon-alpha2b mixed with Spherex((R)), followed by oxaliplatin, FA and 5-FU, appears to be an effective and feasible treatment option in the case of liver metastasis of CRC refractory to standard systemic chemotherapy. This treatment is associated with tolerable toxicity, which becomes apparent mainly as asthenia, neurotoxicity or thrombocytopenia. These preliminary data warrant further evaluation for patients with refractory disease and would probably also be of interest for first-line treatment in this patient population.     

Intra-arterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and chemoembolization with melphalan in the treatment of disseminated colorectal liver metastases.

AIMS: We compared two prospective trials of intra-arterial cytokine/chemotherapeutic infusion plus chemoembolization in the treatment of inoperable colorectal liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients with disseminated inoperable colorectal liver metastases received intra-arterial chemotherapy with 5-FU and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) plus chemoembolization via an angiographically positioned hepatic artery catheter. Two different regimens were used in two consecutive studies. Group A: short-term i.a. infusion of 550 mg/m(2)5-FU (days 1-4) plus 80 microg/m(2)GM-CSF (day 1+2) combined with chemoembolization with 25 mg/m(2)melphalan plus Lipiodol and Gelfoam (day 5). Group B: continuous circadian intra-arterially administered 1400 mg/m(2)5-FU infusion plus 60 mg/m(2)i.v. leucovorin and 80 microg/m(2)GM-CSF (day 1+2) combined with chemoembolization with 25 mg/m(2)melphalan plus Lipiodol and Gelfoam (day 3). RESULTS: One hundred and three patients (62 male/41 female) with a median age of 59.9 and a median Karnofsky index of 88.5 were treated with 447 cycles of immuno-chemoembolization (group A 299, group B 148 cycles). Fifty-seven percent of these patients had received prior systemic chemotherapy. Side-effects were seen in all patients, mainly upper abdominal pain lasting 1-4 days and grade 1 or 2 vomiting. Systemic side-effects were mild and transient with a very low rate of leukopenia. Using World Health Organization response criteria, the following responses could be demonstrated: group A: CR 2.7%, PR 32.4%, MR 21.6%, SD 12.7%, NR 16.2%; group B: CR 1.0%, PR 42.4%, MR 24.2%, SD 18.2%, NR 12.1%. Time to progression was 7 as compared to 8 months. Median survival was 17 months in group A, whereas it has not been reached after 28 months (P=0.0095) in group B. There was no statistically significant difference between chemo-naive patients and patients who had received prior systemic therapy. CONCLUSION: Immuno-chemoembolization combined with 2-day circadian administration of 5-FU is an effective tool in the treatment of disseminated colorectal liver metastases. This regimen is also effective as second-line treatment.     

Could thymostimulin prevent hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence in patients with liver cirrhosis?

On the basis of a possible pathogenetic role of immunodepression in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B/C viral infection and liver cirrhosis, we treated 34 liver cirrhosis patients (M/F 24/10; age: 14 pts less than or equal to 60 years, 20>60; Performance status: 22 0-1, 12 2-3; Childs' grade: 21 A, 13 B; ascites yes/not: 4/30) employing thymostimulin (TST), at the dosage of 50 mg/m(2) i.m. 3 times a week, until death or severe toxicity occurrence. Etiology of cirrhosis was viral in all cases. The patients were followed up every 3 months by means of clinical examination and biochemical analyses; every 6 months by checking viral serum markers, alpha-fetoprotein and by means of ultrasounds. To date, 34 patients have been treated, with a median follow-up of 6 (1-8) years. No occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma has been observed, with a statistically significant difference between observed and expected HCC (p<0.05). Thymostimulin treatment was well tolerated. Our data seem to suggest that the immunomodulating treatment could significantly reduce the risk of HCC occurrence in patients with liver cirrhosis.     

国产多西紫杉醇治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照临床研究

背景与目的：多西紫杉醇已成为临床上治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的主要药物之一。国外报道单药一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效率20％,其主要毒性是骨髓抑制。本研究观察易优瑞康（Euruikang,国产多西紫杉醇）治疗晚期初治非小细胞肺癌的疗效和毒性。方法：共77例患者入组。随机分组,试验组38例,对照组39例。试验组接受易优瑞康75mg／m^2,对照组接受艾素75mg／m^2,1小时输注,两组均联合顺铂70mg／m^2,每3周重复疗程。在多西紫杉醇给药前1天开始口服地塞米松7．5mg,每天2次,连服3天预防过敏反应。所有患者均接受两个疗程以上的化疗。结果：试验组可评价37例,PR15例,SD16例,PD6例,总有效率40．54％。33例4周后再次复查评价,确认有效率为28．95％。对照组可评价疗效37例,PR13例,SD16例,PD8例,总有效率35．14％。34例4周后再次复查评价疗效,确认有效率为27．03％。两组疗效差异无统计学意义。易优瑞康主要的毒副作用为Ⅱ～Ⅲ度骨髓抑制,Ⅰ～Ⅱ度脱发、乏力和消化道反应,未见严重的过敏反应发生。结论：本研究所用的易优瑞康注射液是一种治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌安全有效的药物,与国内已上市的同类产品艾素疗效、毒副作用相当。     

Pleurectomy, intrapleural cisplatin and interferon followed by systemic carboplatin plus interferon in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma has a dismal prognosis and median survival rarely exceeds 12 months. Since multimodality therapy initially showed promising results, we tested the feasibility of a new approach consisting of pleurectomy, immediately followed by intrapleural chemotherapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) day 1) and alpha-interferon (12x10(6) U/m(2) days 1 and 2), followed by 4 cycles of carboplatin, 350 mg/m(2), repeated every 3 weeks and associated to alpha-interferon (3x10(6) U/x3/week). Fourteen patients have been submitted to the protocol and are evaluable for side effects. All patients had surgery and intrapleural chemotherapy, and 4 patients also had systemic chemotherapy. No treatment-related deaths have been observed. Major postoperative complications included chest tube air leak >7 days (1 pt). Intracavitary chemo-immunotherapy-related toxicity was responsible for 7 cases of grade I nephro-toxicity and 2 cases of grade I fever. Grade I-II toxicity from systemic chemotherapy included asthenia (2 cases), fever (3 cases), anemia (2 cases) and neutropenia (2 cases). Grade III-IV toxicity included asthenia (1 case), anemia (2 cases), neutropenia (2 cases) and fever (1 case). Two cases required interruption of systemic chemotherapy for intolerance. Based on these data, systemic chemotherapy has been stopped. In conclusion, our results indicate that pleurectomy plus intra-cavitary cisplatin and interferon is feasible. Since systemic chemotherapy is correlated with severe side effects, a phase II trial with surgery plus intrapleural treatment alone is ongoing.     

Efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy in a phase I-II study for advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine (VNB) with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) combination chemotherapy, a phase I-II study was carried out in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. METHODS: The phase I part of this study was carried out to determine the treatment schedule and acceptable dose of VNB for the phase II study. In phase I, VNB was initially given as a short infusion on days 1, 8 and 15, every 4 weeks. The initial dose of vinorelbine was 15 mg/m2. In the AC regimen, 20 mg/m2 of doxorubicin (ADM) was given intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, and 100 mg/body of cyclophosphamide (CPA) was administered orally from days 1 to 14. Subsequently, a phase II study was carried out at the maximum acceptable dose (MAD). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were entered into this study. In patients receiving VNB at a dose of 15 mg/m2, neutropenia (> or = grade 3) frequently occurred on day 15. The treatment schedule of this study was therefore changed to VNB given i.v. on days 1 and 8 with AC combination chemotherapy. In this treatment schedule, grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 4 days occurred in patients given VNB at a dose of 20 mg/m2 with AC more frequently than in those given 15 mg/m2 of VNB. Therefore, the MAD of VNB was determined to be 20 mg/m2 in this regimen. At this recommended dose, there were 1 complete (CR) and 8 partial responses (PRs) in 15 patients, with an overall response rate of 60.0%. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that VNB plus AC combination chemotherapy was effective and well tolerated for breast cancer patients. A randomized trial of VNB plus AC vs. AC combination chemotherapy may be required to ascertain the benefit of this regimen for advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients.     

Phase II study of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel-estramustine followed by mitoxantrone-prednisone in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Sequential chemotherapy may improve treatment efficacy avoiding the additive toxicity associated with concomitant polichemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Forty patients received docetaxel 30 mg m(-2) intravenous (i.v.), weekly, plus estramustine 280 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. After 2 weeks rest, patients with a decline or stable PSA were treated with mitoxantrone 12 mg m(-2) i.v. every 3 weeks plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily for 12 cycles. Forty patients were assessable for toxicity after docetaxel/estramustine. Main toxicities were grade 3-4 AST/ALT or bilirubin increase in seven patients (17.5%) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in four patients (10%). Twenty-seven patients received mitoxantrone/prednisone. Main toxicities included DVT in one patient (3.7%) and congestive heart failure in two patients (7%). Thirty-nine patients were assessable for PSA response. Twenty-nine patients (72.5%; 95% CI 63-82%) obtained a >/=50% PSA decline with 15 patients (37.5%; 95% CI 20-50%) that demonstrated a >/=90% decrease. Median progression-free and overall survival were respectively 7.0 (95% CI 5.8-8.2 months) and 19.2 months (95% CI 13.9-24.3 months). In conclusion, although this regimen demonstrated a favourable toxicity profile, sequential administration of mitoxantrone is not able to improve docetaxel activity in patients with HRPC.     

Chemoembolization with cisplatin,lipiodol and Gelfoam and subsequent systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin and interferon in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a non-randomized prospective study

Arterial chemoembolization with subsequent systemic chemotherapy was assessed prospectively. Of 94 consecutive patients with HCC, 31 patients were considered to have inoperable disease and were selected for chemoembolization. Twenty-two of the 31 patients underwent chemoembolization. In eight patients, technical problems with catheterization prevented the application of therapy, and one patient rejected further treatment. Regimen: Three monthly cycles of chemoembolization with cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) mixed with lipiodol delivered intraarterially with Gelfoam or collagen on day 1, followed by intravenous chemotherapy with cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 2; interferon alpha-2c 30 microg (10 M IU) subcutaneously on days 2, 5, 9, and 12. Three percent of the patients (1/31) (CI 95% 0.08; 16.7) experienced a partial clinical response, in 53% alpha-fetoprotein levels decreased by more than 50%. On univariate analysis, performance status, Child score, Okuda stage, albumin levels, and lactate dehydrogenase were found to have an effect on survival. Postchemoembolization syndrome occurred in 68% of the patients, nausea/vomiting grades 3/4 (according to the World Health Organization WHO) in six patients, anemia grade 3 in three patients, leukopenia grade 3 in one patient and thrombocytopenia grade 3 in one patient. This treatment regimen is a very selective procedure. Because of the low response rate it is not recommended for routine clinical use.     

VP16, epirubicin and procarbazine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We report the results obtained in the treatment of 52 advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with the combination chemotherapy VP16 (120 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-2-3), epirubicin (50 mg/m2 i.v., day 1) and procarbazine (100 mg/m2 p.o., days 1 through 8). The courses were repeated every 21 days. No patient had been pretreated. A median of 5 courses was administered. Partial response was obtained in 33% and no change in 21% of patients. Median remission time was 6.5 months, and median survival of responders was 10 months. The best response rate and median survival were obtained in the lowest grade performance status patients and in locally advanced disease patients. Major chemotherapy related toxicities were grade 1-2 leukopenia and grade 2-3 alopecia.     

Irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in patients pretreated with Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy: a study to determine recommendable therapeutic dosage

Because no consensus exists regarding recommendable dose levels for irinotecan, an intrapatient dose escalation phase I-II study was initiated in previously treated patients with colorectal cancer. Survival was a secondary endpoint. Thirty-five consecutive patients with progressive disease after 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy were enrolled to receive irinotecan starting from 250 mg/m2/3 weeks and rising to currently used therapeutic doses. In total, 162 cycles were administered. The median tolerable dose was 250 mg/m2. Twelve patients (34%) were unable to tolerate doses greater than 250 mg/m2, 10 patients (28%) presented toxicity at 250 mg/m2 and 2 patients tolerated only 200 mg/m2. Three patients (9%) had partial response. The major adverse reactions were grade III-IV diarrhea, grade II-III nausea/vomiting, grade II-III neutropenia, and grade II-III anaemia in 28%, 48%, 11%, and 17% of the patients, respectively. Median survival time and time to progression were 8 and 3 months, respectively. The current irinotecan dose of 350 mg/m2/3 weeks appears unacceptably toxic and, hence, a lower dose needs to be considered. The response rates obtained are similar to the results observed in phase III studies, and its activity appears not to be adversely affected with this treatment scheme.     

Biweekly triple combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (GOLF) is a safe and active treatment for patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer

GOLF is a triple translational combination chemotherapy regimen with gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (plus levofolinic acid), cytotoxic drugs currently used in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma. Considering its promising anti-tumor effects in patients with gastroenteric malignancies, we carried out the present study to investigate its toxicity and anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the study, 15 males and 12 females with an average age of 61 years and a performance status (ECOG) 相似文献   

A phase II study on the safety and efficacy of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer

The incorporation of a taxane into an anthracycline-containing regimen in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer is a promising approach. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of four cycles of FEC (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 70 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, every 3 weeks) followed by four cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) in the adjuvant treatment of node-positive and other high-risk breast cancer patients. A total of 88 female patients were enrolled. Mean age (+/- SD) of the patients was 47 +/- 10 (min: 24; max: 71). The patients were followed for a median of 48 months (min: 20; max: 64). The most common side effects were nausea-vomiting (grade I-II: 91%; grade III: 2%), as well as hematological toxicity (grade I-II: 70%; grade III: 3%). Although all patients experienced some degree of toxicity, it was severe enough to be classified as grade III or IV in only 10 (11%) of the cases. Of note, six (8%) patients had grade I and only one (1%) had grade II cardiotoxicity. No grade III or IV cardiotoxicity was observed. The full eight cycles of study treatment could be administered to 75 patients (85%). Side effects necessitated the reduction of the doses of FEC and paclitaxel in one (1%) and three patients (3%), respectively. Median overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) have not yet been reached. Five-year OS and DFS have been estimated to be 78% and 61%, respectively. We conclude that FEC followed by paclitaxel is a well-tolerated and feasible regimen in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Its efficacity is comparable with other commonly used regimens and merits evaluation in a phase III study.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of mitoxantrone, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil for node-positive breast cancer: phase II pilot study

A phase II pilot study was carried out on 30 patients to ascertain the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (NMF) in the adjuvant setting for axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer. The NMF regimen was mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 administered i.v. on day 1, repeated every 3-4 weeks for 6 cycles. The median nadir WBC count was 2,000/microl; grade 4 leukocytopenia occurred only in 1 patient. Nausea and vomiting appeared as grade 0 and 1 severity in 26/30 patients. Alopecia was extremely mild, appeared as grade 0 and 1 in 29/30 patients. The overall and relapse-free survival rates were 67.8% and 68.4% at the 82-month follow-up, respectively. The overall survival rate in premenopausal patients was significantly better than that in postmenopausal patients (P<0.05). NMF is a well-tolerated combination regimen, suitable as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer.     

Phase II study of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: an Alpe-Adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary group study (ATOM 007)

This study was designed to evaluate the activity and tolerability of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligibility included recurrent or progressive NSCLC, previous chemotherapy, age > or = 18 years, ECOG PS < or = 2. Treatment consisted of irinotecan (160 mg/m2 i.v.), followed by docetaxel (65 mg/m2 i.v.) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, for a maximum of 6 cycles. Forty patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years and median ECOG PS was 1. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 31 (78%) were evaluable for response. A total of 125 cycles was administered (median, 3; range, 1-6). Most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (62%), neutropenic fever (22%), and diarrhea (32%). Response rate was 10%; a further 40% of patients achieved stable disease. All responses were observed in patients with ECOG PS < or = 1, age <70 years, and who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen. Median time to progression was 2.8 months and median survival was 7.4 months. Because of significant toxicity and limited activity, further investigation of irinotecan plus docetaxel in second line NSCLC is not recommended.     

Chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, and procarbazine versus cisplatin and etoposide. A randomized study

All consecutive eligible patients with non-small-lung carcinoma seen at Centro di Riferimento Oncologico and Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro were entered into a randomized chemotherapy study. Conditions of eligibility included advanced stage (stage III not amenable to radiation therapy or i.v.), measurable or evaluable lesions, age less than 70 years, performance status (PS) greater than 40, and no previous chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to either CAMP (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 i.v., adriamycin 20 mg/m2 i.v., methotrexate 15 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, procarbazine 100 mg/m2 orally from day 1 to day 10, every 4 weeks) or DE (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. for five consecutive days and etoposide 75 mg/m2 i.v. on the same days, every 3 weeks). Treatment was continued until progression. Out of the 136 patients randomized, 133 were eligible (CAMP 62, DE 71) and 108 evaluable. Patient characteristics included male/female ratio 57/5 (CAMP) and 61/10 (DE), median age of 60 years (CAMP) and 59 years (DE), PS greater than or equal to 70 for 39 (CAMP) and 50 (DE), PS less than 70 for 23 (CAMP) and 21 (DE), stage III for 18 (CAMP) and 15 (DE), and stage IV for 44 (CAMP) and 56 (DE). DE was superior to CAMP in terms of response rate, defined as responding/evaluable patient ratio (38.2% versus 20.8%); however, the responding/eligible patient ratio was not significantly different in the two groups. The superiority of DE tended to be more marked in stage III patients, in patients with PS greater than or equal to 70, and in the squamous histological type. Toxicity was acceptable (one toxic death) and evenly distributed in the two treatment groups; only renal toxicity was prevalent in the DE group. Survival (all eligible patients) was significantly better in the DE than in the CAMP group. Whether DE chemotherapy is superior to a no-chemotherapy approach has not been evaluated in this study and remains to be determined.     

The relationship between the pathological changes and response rate (RR) in non-small cell lung cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin (MMC), vindesine (VDS) and cisplatin (DDP) combination

Lung cancer is the leading cause of male cancer death in the big cities in China. The mortality is growing recent years. It has been confirmed that the best treatment for non-small cell lung cancer is the surgery-based multimodality therapy. But only 20% of NSCLC patients present with stage I and II disease and can be resected completely when the diagnosis is established. It is a trend for stage II and IIIa patients to use adjuvant chemotherapy in order to improve the 5-year survival rat…     

Oxaliplatin with raltitrexed and preoperative radiotherapy in T3-T4 extraperitoneal rectal cancer. A dose finding study

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The availability of new drugs offers the opportunity to improve the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer. Raltitrexed and oxaliplatin are effective in advanced colorectal cancer with acceptable toxicity and can act as radiation enhancers as shown in phase I-II studies. The aim of the study was thus to determine the recommended dose of oxaliplatin concomitantly administered with raltitrexed and concurrent preoperative radiotherapy in patients with stage II-III extraperitoneal rectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2001 to September 2002, 18 consecutive patients with T3/T4 rectal cancer were treated at our Institution with preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery after 6-8 weeks. Pelvic radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions in 5 weeks followed by a 5.4 Gy boost at 1.8 Gy daily. Concomitant chemotherapy consisted of 3 mg/m2/i.v. of raltitrexed on days 1, 19, 38 of radiotherapy treatment with incremental doses of oxaliplatin according to dose finding rules (4 dose levels: 65, 85, 110, 130 mg/m2). Dose-limiting toxicity for oxaliplatin was defined as either grade 3-4 hematological or grade 3-4 gastrointestinal or neurological toxicity. We studied a minimum of 3 patients at each dose level. RESULTS: Three patients were treated at 65, 85, and 110 mg/m2/i.v., respectively, while 9 patients were recruited at the last dose level. Neither grade 3-4 gastrointestinal nor neurological toxicity were documented. Dose-limiting toxicity was documented in 2/9 subjects at the 130 mg/m2 level consisting of grade 3 transient asymptomatic leukopenia. Thirteen patients developed transient increase of one or more liver enzymes (grade 3-4) and 2 patients developed grade 3 perineal dermatitis. All patients received the programmed dose of radiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen was not completed in 4 cases due to grade 2 protracted leukopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin was not reached at the maximum dose level (i.v.); 130 mg/m2 can therefore be defined as the recommended dose. The combination of oxaliplatin with raltitrexed and radiotherapy can be considered feasible and well tolerated.     

胃肠癌肝转移经肝动脉栓塞及皮下药盒持续灌注化疗的疗效初探

目的本研究观察经肝动脉栓塞化疗和(或)肝动脉插管持续灌注化疗治疗晚期胃肠癌肝转移的临床疗效.方法 22例无外科手术指征的晚期胃肠癌肝转移患者经肝动脉介入治疗共72次,单采取Seldinger法肝动脉内插管皮下埋置药盒持续灌注化疗48次,或先用吡柔比星(THP)60 mg/m2和DDP 50 mg/m2加入超液化碘油10～30 ml进行肝动脉栓塞化疗再联合肝动脉持续灌注化疗共24次.肝动脉插管灌注的方案:CF 200 mg/m2,d1,d14,静脉滴入;顺铂(DDP)50 mg/m2,d1,或用奥沙利铂100～130 mg/m2,d1,从皮下药盒处缓慢推入;5-Fu 2 000～2 500 mg/m2,d1,d14,装入美国百特公司的便携式输液泵持续动脉灌注48 h.结果总有效率(完全缓解 部分缓解)为59.0%.肿瘤负荷＜30%者的有效率为77.8%,明显高于肿瘤负荷＞30%者(46.2%,P＜0.005).本组患者主要不良反应为肝功能损害、发热及胃肠道反应等,经相应对症处理可缓解.结论经肝动脉栓塞及插管持续化疗是治疗胃肠癌肝转移的安全有效方法,值得临床推广.