《实用医药杂志》2013—2014年载文分析

目的分析2013—2014年《实用医药杂志》载文特点,了解期刊编辑质量及信息传递情况,为进一步提高办刊质量提供理论依据。方法对2013—2014年《实用医药杂志》刊载学术性文章进行检索统计。结果共载文1571篇,期均篇数65.5篇,篇均页数1.47页,信息密度10.9,合作性文章1291篇,占82%;刊出临床医学类论文最多,占37%。基金论文85篇,2013、2014年基金论文比分别为0.04、0.07。结论 2013—2014年《实用医药杂志》载文质量较高,基金论文比提高明显。     

《肿瘤药学》杂志2011年引文分析

目的对《肿瘤药学》杂志2011年载文的引文进行分析,以了解本刊的引文情况及文献利用能力。方法利用Excel软件,对引文量、引文语种及类型、引文时间分布与普赖斯指数、自引率等进行定量分析。结果 131篇论文中,共有引文1670条,篇均引文12.7条,其中,英文1048条,占62.8%,中文621条,占37.2%;期刊为最主要的情报源,占94.2%;84.1%的引文在文章发表的前10年内,普赖斯指数为53.9%;自引率为2.6%。结论《肿瘤药学》杂志以中、英文期刊为主要情报源,近10年的文献可基本满足引文需要。     

1997~2004年《西北药学杂志》文献计量学分析

目的客观、科学地对《西北药学杂志》的质量进行评估。方法采用文献计量学的方法,统计分析了1997~2004年4月《西北药学杂志》的载文量、著作者信息、载文内容和引文量。结果《西北药学杂志》著者群在不断扩大,主要涉及陕西、浙江、山东、江苏等10省区,论文合著率较高,达76.5%,载文内容着重药学的应用领域,如药物分析、中药及天然药物和科研简报等栏目,篇均引文量5篇。结论《西北药学杂志》是一份优秀的药学综合性期刊,还需进一步拓展读者、作者群,稳定提高杂志质量。     

《中国药物依赖性杂志》2010—2020年甲基苯丙胺研究文献计量统计分析

为了掌握《中国药物依赖性杂志》2010—2020年甲基苯丙胺研究文章载文特点和内容，基于文献计量学的研究方法，对2010—2020年《中国药物依赖性杂志》甲基苯丙胺研究文章的发文量、研究机构、发文作者、高被引论文、获基金资助分布情况和甲基苯丙胺研究热点共6个方面进行统计分析。结果表明：2010—2020年《中国药物依赖性杂志》共发表甲基苯丙胺研究论文192篇，约占主要毒品研究的39.34%;121篇论文获各类基金资助共211项次，获基金资助的文章占总发文量的63.02%;北京大学中国药物依赖性研究所总发文量最高，发文28篇。研究结果客观展示了2010—2020年《中国药物依赖性杂志》甲基苯丙胺研究文章的质量在不断提高，且获国家类基金资助也较多，北京大学中国药物依赖性研究所在甲基苯丙胺研究领域处于领先地位。     

《抗感染药学》创刊5年载文及引文分析

目的:归纳、分析《抗感染药学》创刊5年载文、引文、电子网络传播趋势与作者分布等情况。方法:采用文献计量学与Microsoft Excel数据分析系统进行统计分析。结果:《抗感染药学》2004年6月—2009年3月共20期载文438篇,作者(第一作者)分布在25个省和直辖市,作者机构429家(其中高等院校57家,医院320家,科研等单位52家);总引文篇数(期刊为主)3 115条,篇均引文7.11条,英文引文量占32.43%(1 019/3 142),中文引文占67.54%(2 122/3 142);普赖斯指数2007年前略低于50%,而2007年后呈现直线上升,明显高于50%;期基金课题论文1.80篇/期;影响因子由2005年的0.104递增至2007年的0.439。结论:《抗感染药学》载文分布地域广,引文率高、时效性较好。     

《国际生物制品学杂志》2010-2014年载文分析

目的 分析《国际生物制品学杂志》2010-2014年的载文特点,了解该刊的学术水平.方法 以《国际生物制品学杂志》2010-2014年5卷共30期杂志作为统计源,采用文献计量学方法,分别对载文量、栏目、基金论文、引文、作者等项目进行逐项统计和分析.结果 《国际生物制品学杂志》5年共刊载论文352篇,期均发文数为11.73篇,篇均页数为4.59页.该刊的平均引文率为89.77％,篇均引文数为20.59条.作者来自国内22个省、自治区和直辖市,上海作者最多,为78人,占27.46％.第一作者主要来自科研院所,占54.23％,作者合作度为3.62人/篇,合著率为96.48％.结论 《国际生物制品学杂志》的影响范围较大,是读者获取生物制品领域信息的主要学术期刊.     

基于《药学服务与研究》杂志论文检索探讨临床药学发展

目的:通过文献检索分析了解临床药学学科发展情况。方法:中文文献以《药学服务与研究》网站、中国知网及万方数据-数字化期刊群为检索工具,英文文献以PubMed作为检索工具,分别以"临床药学、临床药师"等10大临床药学中文主题词和"clinical pharmacy、clinical pharmacist"等10大临床药学英文主题词进行检索。统计2002-2013年《药学服务与研究》杂志发表的泛临床药学论文情况,并与同时间段国内外相关论文发表情况作对比,分析《药学服务与研究》在国内外同类期刊中所处地位及其对临床药学学科发展的影响。结果:我国临床药学研究起步晚于西方发达国家,2002-2013年国内泛临床药学论文发表量占2014年之前全部同类论文量的88.36%,西方国家该时间段只占61.93%。《药学服务与研究》杂志2002-2013年刊载的20篇高被引论文中有17篇与临床药学有关;2002-2013年年均刊载泛临床药学论文96.17篇,高于国内医药卫生同类期刊(每种期刊年均40.05篇),年均增长率为8.80%。国内泛临床药学论文发表量年均增长率(17.67%)高于国外同类期刊刊载英文文献量的年均增长率(5.53%)。结论:《药学服务与研究》杂志较好地反映了我国临床药学的总体发展趋势,年均泛临床药学论文刊载量发展速度处于较高水平,对临床药学学科发展起到了一定的推动作用。     

《抗感染学》创刊10周年载文概况及其相关信息的分析

目的：分析《抗感染药学》创刊10周年的载文概况及其相关信息。方法：运用Microsoft Office Excel 2007版软件和文献计量学方法,分析2004年6月-2014年3月间出版的40期载文信息（936篇）,其内容包括载文概况、相关信息（作者机构、课题基金论文比、载文作者合作、国内外电子媒体的网络传播、影响因子和时滞情况）等。结果：《抗感染药学》期刊办刊宗旨明确,导向性和实用性较为突出;2009-2014年基金论文比为20．56％-25．00％,影响因子为0．618-0．755,网络传播海内外用户18000余家,下载量和浏览量分别为100171和109527次。结论：《抗感染药学》期刊办刊宗旨明确,载文内容丰富,主要作者为科研、医药院校和医疗单位。     

从文献分析看循证药学的发展现状

目的：通过分析近年循证药学发展相关文献,了解国内循证药学的发展现状。方法：以＂循证＂和＂药＂为检索词,对1998-2012年的中国医院知识总库和维普数据库进行检索,对循证药学平均文献量、基金资助率、论文合作度、期刊发布特点、文献研究方向等指标进行分析。结果：循证药学平均文献量为4.9篇/年,基金资助率为13%,平均论文合作度为2.59,排前10位的期刊载文量达到全部载文的50%,循证药学研究方向涉及8个方向。结论：目前循证药学发展较快,但仍处于发展初始阶段。     

《华西药学杂志》1999～2005年论文和著者分析

统计1999~2005年《华西药学杂志》载文情况,分析载文著者分布情况、地区及机构分布情况,从而了解论文著者及科研人员合作情况,确定核心著者、核心机构和核心地区。为更好地提高本刊质量,更好地为药学科研和教学发展服务,为著者投稿提供有益的参考。     

《实用医药杂志》2002～2005年载文被引用情况分析

笔者依据中国期刊网CNKI数字图书馆之中国引文数据库统计分析《实用医药杂志》在2002～2005年被国内期刊引用情况。结果显示2002～2005年该刊共有553位第一作者的657篇文献被国内期刊引用1059次,其中被引5次以上的文献有20篇,共被引148次;共有419种期刊以及68所院校的研究生毕业论文引用了该刊2002～2005年发表的文献;发表于2005和2006年的引证文献占77.53%。基于以上结果表明该刊具有较高的学术水平。     

《中国药房》2005年刊登论文及其作者信息统计分析

目的:为药学人员提供《中国药房》刊登论文及其作者相关信息。方法:用Microsoft Access建立数据库,录入《中国药房》2005年刊登的论文,对栏目、作者信息及单位等进行统计分析。结果:发文以实验研究、药品检验、综述讲座、药物与临床、临床药学为主,作者以高、中级职称居多,系统以医院居多。结论:《中国药房》系综合性药学期刊,可为医院药学工作者提供参考。     

Evaluation of drug reviews

Drug reviews appearing in Clinical Pharmacy, Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy (DICP), Drugs, and Pharmacotherapy from January 1982 through December 1984 were evaluated for number, duplication among journals, timeliness, scope, and format. The design of this study was primarily quantitative rather than qualitative. Pharmacotherapy published the most reviews (49), followed by Drugs (43), Clinical Pharmacy (37), and DICP (29). Drugs and Pharmacotherapy published the largest number of unique reviews (agents not reviewed by the other journals during the study period), while Pharmacotherapy and Clinical Pharmacy published the most reviews on newly marketed drugs. Reviews of four drugs (acyclovir, moxalactam, ranitidine, and trazodone) were compared in terms of major sections, terminology and format, bibliography, use of tables and figures, scope of evaluative comments, and review process. Reviews in Drugs consistently contained the most references and tables and provided the most detail. Information was most accessible in Drugs, followed by Pharmacotherapy. Drugs used the largest panel of reviewers. All of the journals provided evaluative comments, although the scope varied. Continuing-education credit is available for review articles in Clinical Pharmacy and DICP. In selecting one or more of these journals, individuals or institutions should compare their needs with regard to the timeliness, scope, and format of the review articles in each journal.     

A 5-Year Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Publications of Pharmacy Practice Faculty Members

Objectives. To evaluate scholarship, as represented by peer-reviewed journal articles, among US pharmacy practice faculty members; contribute evidence that may better inform benchmarking by academic pharmacy practice departments; and examine factors that may be related to publication rates.Methods. Journal articles published by all pharmacy practice faculty members between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010, were identified. College and school publication rates were compared based on public vs. private status, being part of a health science campus, having a graduate program, and having doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) faculty members funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).Results. Pharmacy practice faculty members published 6,101 articles during the 5-year study period, and a pharmacy practice faculty member was the primary author on 2,698 of the articles. Pharmacy practice faculty members published an average of 0.51 articles per year. Pharmacy colleges and schools affiliated with health science campuses, at public institutions, with NIH-funded PharmD faculty members, and with graduate programs had significantly higher total publication rates compared with those that did not have these characteristics (p<0.006).Conclusion. Pharmacy practice faculty members contributed nearly 6,000 unique publications over the 5-year period studied. However, this reflects a rate of less than 1 publication per faculty member per year, suggesting that a limited number of faculty members produced the majority of publications.     

[Artículo traducido] Mejora de la calidad de las publicaciones y avance en los paradigmas de la investigación en Farmacia Práctica clínica y social: la Declaración de Granada

Pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences embrace a series of different disciplines. Pharmacy practice has been defined as “the scientific discipline that studies the different aspects of the practice of pharmacy and its impact on health care systems, medicine use, and patient care”. Thus, pharmacy practice studies embrace both clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy elements. Like any other scientific discipline, clinical and social pharmacy practice disseminates research findings using scientific journals. Clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy journal editors have a role in promoting the discipline by enhancing the quality of the articles published. As has occurred in other health care areas (i.e., medicine and nursing), a group of clinical and social pharmacy practice journal editors gathered in Granada, Spain to discuss how journals could contribute to strengthening pharmacy practice as a discipline. The result of that meeting was compiled in these Granada Statements, which comprise 18 recommendations gathered into six topics: the appropriate use of terminology, impactful abstracts, the required peer reviews, journal scattering, more effective and wiser use of journal and article performance metrics, and authors’ selection of the most appropriate pharmacy practice journal to submit their work. © 2023 The Author(s) Published by Elsevier Inc, Springer Nature, Brazilian Society of Hospital Pharmacy and Health Services, Elsevier Inc, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Biomedcentral, Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (S.E.F.H), Pharmaceutical Care España Foundation, European Association of Hospital Pharmacists, Faculty of Pharmacy     

近10年药房管理专题文献的计量学研究

目的:探讨我国药房管理领域的研究现状和发展趋势,供药事管理专业人员参考。方法:运用文献计量学中的方法对近10年药房管理相关文献进行统计和分析,应用布拉德福定律寻找刊载药房管理文献的核心期刊,并对文献后标有的参考文献进行引文分析。结果:近10年内药房管理类文献增长率达80.75%,共有262种科技期刊刊载过此类文献,其中载文量最多的为《中国药房》;《中国药房》、《中国药业》、《军队医药》、《药学实践杂志》等期刊为刊载药房管理文献的核心期刊;在文献刊载内容方面,有关"社会药房(店)"、"药学服务"及"医院门诊药房管理"方面的内容呈增长趋势。结论:随着我国药房数量和规模的迅速扩张,越来越多的专业人员在药房管理领域展开了研究与探索,为我国药房管理出谋划策。     

Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada Statements

Pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences embrace a series of different disciplines. Pharmacy practice has been defined as “the scientific discipline that studies the different aspects of the practice of pharmacy and its impact on health care systems, medicine use, and patient care”. Thus, pharmacy practice studies embrace both clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy elements. Like any other scientific discipline, clinical and social pharmacy practice disseminates research findings using scientific journals. Clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy journal editors have a role in promoting the discipline by enhancing the quality of the articles published. As has occurred in other health care areas (i.e., medicine and nursing), a group of clinical and social pharmacy practice journal editors gathered in Granada, Spain to discuss how journals could contribute to strengthening pharmacy practice as a discipline. The result of that meeting was compiled in these Granada Statements, which comprise 18 recommendations gathered into six topics: the appropriate use of terminology, impactful abstracts, the required peer reviews, journal scattering, more effective and wiser use of journal and article performance metrics, and authors’ selection of the most appropriate pharmacy practice journal to submit their work.     

Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements

Pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences embrace a series of different disciplines. Pharmacy practice has been defined as “the scientific discipline that studies the different aspects of the practice of pharmacy and its impact on health care systems, medicine use, and patient care”. Thus, pharmacy practice studies embrace both clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy elements. Like any other scientific discipline, clinical and social pharmacy practice disseminates research findings using scientific journals. Clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy journal editors have a role in promoting the discipline by enhancing the quality of the articles published. As has occurred in other health care areas (i.e., medicine and nursing), a group of clinical and social pharmacy practice journal editors gathered in Granada, Spain to discuss how journals could contribute to strengthening pharmacy practice as a discipline. The result of that meeting was compiled in these Granada Statements, which comprise 18 recommendations gathered into six topics: the appropriate use of terminology, impactful abstracts, the required peer reviews, journal scattering, more effective and wiser use of journal and article performance metrics, and authors’ selection of the most appropriate pharmacy practice journal to submit their work.     

2003～2007年科学引文索引扩展版药理学和药剂学领域高影响因子期刊论文分析

目的:为药学科研工作者提供科学引文索引扩展版药理学和药剂学领域高影响因子期刊论文的相关信息。方法:根据美国科学信息研究所发布的2007期刊引证报告网络版筛选出药理学和药剂学领域影响因子排名前10位的期刊,在科学引文索引扩展版中套录2003～2007年10种期刊发表的全部论文,利用论文分析软件Thomson Data Analyzer对套录的论文从多角度进行分析。结果与结论:10种期刊在2003～2007年发文量稳定;论文类型以Review和Meeting Abstract为主;发文量排名前10的国家和机构集中在欧美发达国家;研究热点集中在癌症、心血管疾病、白血病、艾滋病等领域,研究已深入到分子生物学水平。鉴于此,我国药学科研工作者在发表专业文章时可选择高影响力期刊,提高论文影响力。     

Mapping pharmacy journals: A lexicographic analysis

BackgroundPharmacy journals constitute a heterogeneous group that can be map to identify Pharmacy scientific subareas.ObjectiveThis study aimed to objectively map Pharmacy journals by means of a lexicographic analysis of the titles of published articles.MethodsActive journals between 2006 and 2016 containing any of the terms ‘pharmacy’, ‘pharmacist*’, ‘pharmaceut*’, ‘pharmacol*’, or ‘pharmacotherap*’ in their titles were searched in four databases (01/15/2018): Medline, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index expanded/Social Sciences Citation Index expanded (SCIe/SSCIe), and Scopus CiteScore Metrics. The titles of all the articles (Jan-2006 to Dec-2016) in the identified journals were gathered into a single text corpus. The following analyses were performed (Iramuteq 0.7): lexicographic analysis to determine the number, frequency and distribution of active words; descending hierarchical classification (DHC) to categorize active words and journals into lexical classes; factorial correspondence analyses (FCA) to obtain bi- and tri-dimensional graphs.ResultsA total of 285 journals comprising 316,089 articles (median 70.4 articles [IQR 34.0–141.0] per journal per year) were included for the analyses. The journals were indexed in Scopus (90.2%) with a median CiteScore of 1.16 (IQR 0.28–2.55); in SCIe/SSCIe (44.6%) with a median impact factor of 2.410 (IQR 1.629–3.316); and in PubMed (65.7%). The DHC of active words produced three major groups (A, B, C) with two lexical classes each, representing six Pharmacy subareas depicted by the FCA as: Group A comprising ‘Cell Pharmacology’ (20 journals) and ‘Molecular Pharmacology’ (46 journals), Group B with ‘Clinical Pharmacology’ (57 journals) and ‘Pharmacy Practice’ (67 journals), and Group C with ‘Pharmaceutics’ (35 journals) and ‘Pharmaceutical Analysis’ (60 journals). Coverage of the classes in bibliographic databases and impact metrics is unbalanced.ConclusionsPharmacy journals that can be objectively classified into six different classes that represent different research subareas with uneven coverage in bibliographic databases.