Living donor liver transplantation for the patients with portal vein thrombosis: use of an interpositional venous graft passed posteriorly to the pancreatic parenchyma without using jump graft

Background

It is difficult to reconstruct the portal vein (PV) using a long interpositional venous graft in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which involves the confluence of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and splenic vein (SV). We successfully performed LDLT for three patients with PVT using an interpositional vascular conduit passing posterior to the pancreas without a jump graft.

Methods

Three of 130 patients who underwent LDLT in our hospital between March 2002 and June 2011 required this technique. After indentifying the location of the SMV, SV and gastrocolic trunk, we ligated and cut the posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein and other short branches from the PV. The PV was drawn inferiorly to the pancreas and transected at the confluence of SMV and SV. The external iliac vein or internal jugular vein was sacrificed as a graft for anastomosis to the cut end of the SMV using 6-0 polypropylene running sutures. Then the venous graft was drawn superiorly to the pancreas by passing it posterior to the pancreas parenchyma for anastomosis to the liver graft PV. The interpositional vein was placed posterior to the pancreas where the PV used to be.

Results

All three patients displayed favorable postoperative courses with the Doppler ultrasound demonstrating good portal flow perioperatively. The postoperative portogram demonstrated patency of the vascular graft.

Conclusion

This method is easy and helpful to treat portal vein thrombosis, by providing the shortest route between the PV of the donor and the SMV of the recipient.     

Clinical analysis of living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis

Kim S‐J, Kim D‐G, Park J‐H, Moon I‐S, Lee M‐D, Kim J‐I, Yoon Y‐C, Yoo Y‐K. Clinical analysis of living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 111–118. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The aim of this study was to improve outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Of 246 adult patients who underwent LDLT with a right lobe graft between January 2000 and May 2007, PVT was diagnosed in 50 patients (20.3%), who were further subdivided into partial (n = 39, 78%) and complete (n = 11, 22%) types. Patients with PVT, especially complete PVT, showed high incidences of variceal bleeding (p = 0.021), operative RBC transfusion (p < 0.046) and a post‐transplantation complications related to bleeding (p = 0.058). We also classified PVT according to its location and the presence of collaterals: type I (n = 41, 82%): PVT localized above the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins (SMV); type II (n = 7, 14%): PVT extending below the confluence with a patent distal SMV; type III (n = 2, 4%): complete portal vein and SMV thrombosis except for a coronary vein. LDLT could be safely undertaken in patients with PVT without increased mortality. In our type II and III PVT, when thrombectomy fails, jump grafting using a cryopreserved vessel may serve as a reliable alternative method to restore portal flow.     

The Use of Recipient Superficial Femoral Vein as a Venous Graft for Portal Vein Reconstruction in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in the recipient is frequently regarded as a contraindication. To reconstruct the PV of a right-lobe liver graft (RLG) using an interposition or jump graft from the splenomesenteric junction, various vein grafts and technical modifications have been introduced. The internal jugular, external iliac, or great saphenous veins have been utilized in such reconstructive procedures. However, the superficial femoral vein (SFV) is preferable to the autologous vein grafts in terms of caliber, wall thickness, and length. We employed the recipient SFV to reconstruct PVT among 40 adult LDLT using RLG. Thirty-three were reconstructed by single end-to-end anastomosis with the right or left recipient PV. Three patients were transplanted with a RLG using 2 separated PVs reconstructed by double anastomoses with both the right and left PVs of the recipient. The remaining 4 patients required venous grafting for portal reconstruction. We used the recipient SFV as an interposition or jump graft from the splenomesenteric junction to the graft PV. There were 2 cases of anastomotic PV stenosis; 1 in portal reconstruction without a venous graft and the other with a SFV graft. Both were treated successfully by balloon angioplasty. The recipient SFV is an excellent size match for the PV reconstruction as a long interposition or jump conduit when the venous system from the deceased donor is not available. The indication for LDLT in patients with complete PVT should be carefully decided before transplantation in terms of portal reconstruction.     

Treatments and outcomes of intra-operative portal vein thrombosis in living-donor liver transplantation due to biliary atresia

BackgroundPediatric living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become one of the most effective therapies for pediatric end-stage liver diseases. We aim to investigate the risk factors for intra-operative portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and the short- and long-term outcomes in children post LDLT.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis from 584 cases of biliary atresia (BA) patients who had undergone LDLT from January 2014 to December 2019 at our hospital. Patients were divided into PVT and non-PVT groups according to the occurrence of PVT during LDLT.ResultsThe median age of recipients at transplantation was 7.22 (quartiles, 6.03, 9.50) months, the incidence of intra-operative PVT was 5.31% (31/584). The independent risk factors for intra-operative PVT were the diameter of the recipient's PV not greater than 4 mm and a higher ratio of graft-to-recipient PV diameter. The cumulative survival rates of grafts and recipients were 93.5% and 93.5% in the PVT group, and 94.9% and 95.3% in the non-PVT group, respectively, without significant difference. The recovery of graft function was similar in recipients with or without interposed graft vessel (IGV). However, the incidence of PV stenosis was higher in recipients with IGV after LDLT.ConclusionIntra-operative PVT is a common complication in pediatric LDLT, but an excellent prognosis can be achieved by appropriate and individualized surgical treatment. We noted that intra-operative PVT did not affect the survival rates of grafts and recipients, but there was a higher incidence of PV complications after LDLT.Level of EvidenceⅢ     

Donor complications including the report of one death in right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our objective is to assess donor complications in all right hepatic lobe living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at our center. METHODS: Of a total of 352 liver transplantations performed, 60 were right-lobe LDLT. Most donors (88.3%) were related to the recipients. RESULTS: Mean hospital stay was 5.4+/-0.6 days. No complications occurred due to preoperative evaluation. Most donors received one or two units of autologous blood transfusion. Only 5 (8.3%) needed nonautologous blood transfusion. Most complications were minor and treated conservatively. Bile leaks from the cut surface of the liver occurred in 5 donors (8.3%). Two patients had potentially fatal complications: perforated duodenal ulcer and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The donor with perforated ulcer developed septicemia and multiple organ failure. He was discharged from the hospital with hemiparesis due to cerebral ischemia. The patient with PVT remained asymptomatic and the portal vein was recanalized by the 3rd postoperative month. One donor died in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac arrest due to cardiac arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Right hepatectomy for LDLT may be associated with significant morbidity, including death and it should be performed only by surgeons with great experience.     

Arteroportal fistulas between the accessory right hepatic, gastroduodenal and superior mesenteric arteries and portal vein: a difficult technical problem to overcome in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Fistulous communications between the accessory right hepatic (ARHA), gastroduodenal (GD), and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries and the portal vein (PV) may represent a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT). MATERIAL: A patient with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and progressive liver decompensation underwent preoperative LT work-up. Doppler ultrasound (DU), Angiography and MRI revealed arteroportal fistulas (APF) and diversion of mesenteric-splenoportal flow through spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SSRS) in the systemic circulation. The patient was transplanted and the ARHA and GDA were distally sectioned; the HA was anastomosed to the donor HA; the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) was detached from the splenopancreatic venous bed by sectioning and ligating the Henle trunk, by ligating an posterior-inferior pancreatic vein and, finally, by positioning an iliac vein interposition graft between the SMV and the donor PV. The postanastomotic SMV trunk and recipient PV were ligated below and above the pancreatic head, respectively. RESULTS: Reperfusion and late liver function were good. DU and MRI studies showed an effective portal flow and the maintenance of a normal splenopancreatic vein outflow through the SSRS. DISCUSSION: APF represent a serious clinical problem, particularly in patients who need LT. The persistence of arterial flow into the PV is dangerous for the long-term liver function. A particular surgical strategy, strictly tailored to the hemodynamic conditions, has to be planned. CONCLUSIONS: Extrahepatic multiple APF would no longer to represent a contraindication to LT, although this claim needs to be confirmed in the light of further experience and a longer-term follow-up.     

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative detection of portal vein thrombosis in liver transplant candidates.

The detection of main portal vein thrombosis (PVT) on preoperative imaging of liver transplant candidates has important technical implications for the transplantation procedure. Data are scarce regarding the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at detecting PVT. The aim of our study was to compare preoperative findings of the portal vein on MRI to operative findings at liver transplantation. Abdominal MRI and clinical records of 172 consecutive patients who received liver transplants between January 1999 and September 2004 were reviewed. Two radiologists independently evaluated the last abdominal magnetic resonance examinations obtained before liver transplantation, blinded to the original reading, operative findings, and clinical data. Findings on MRI were compared with intraoperative findings at transplantation. Main PVT was detected in 12 patients, in whom 8 were found to have thrombus at surgery, with 6 requiring a jump graft or thrombectomy. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting main PVT were 100% and 98%, respectively. The cause of discordance between findings on MRI and at transplantation in 2 cases was a diminutive caliber of the main portal vein that was interpreted as recanalized chronic thrombosis on MRI. In conclusion, in our study group MRI detected PVT in all liver transplant recipients requiring jump grafts at transplantation. The major reason for a false-positive MRI was a diminutive but patent portal vein.     

肝移植中门静脉-内脏曲张静脉吻合在门静脉机化血栓患者的应用

目的:探讨门静脉-内脏曲张静脉吻合在门静脉机化血栓患者肝移植中的应用。方法:对门静脉和肠系膜上静脉均完全被机化血栓阻塞的7例患者实施肝移植,其中3例供体门静脉-曲张冠状静脉吻合;2例髂静脉搭桥供体门静脉和脾门旁曲张的静脉吻合;1例采用供体门静脉-胆总管前曲张静脉吻合;1例供体门静脉—曲张的胃网膜右静脉吻合。结果:7例手术全部成功。1例术后7d死于多脏器功能衰竭,但是门静脉血流一直通畅。1例术后6个月发现吻合口狭窄,术后9个月采用经皮肝穿刺门静脉支架置入治愈;其余患者分别随访12～22个月,门静脉血流均通畅,无狭窄或血栓形成,肝、肾功能正常。结论:肝移植中对门静脉和肠系膜上静脉均完全被机化血栓阻塞的患者,行供体门静脉-曲张内脏静脉吻合可取得良好疗效。     

Portal vein complications after adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation

Successful management of portal vein (PV) complications after liver transplantation is crucial to long‐term success. Little information is available, however, regarding the incidence and treatment of PV complications after adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Between January 1996 and October 2006, 310 adult LDLTs were performed at our institution. PV thrombus was present in 54 patients at the time of LDLT. The incidence of PV complications, choice of therapeutic intervention, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 310 recipients, PV complications were identified in 28 (9%). Risk factors included smaller graft size, presence of PV thrombus at the time of LDLT, and use of jump or interposition cryo‐preserved vein grafts for PV reconstruction. When divided into early (within 3 months, n = 11) and late (after 3 months, n = 17) complications, the use of vein grafts for PV reconstruction predisposed to the occurrence of late, but not early, PV complications. Portal vein thrombosis occurred more frequently in the early period (eight out of 11, 73%), whereas stenosis occurred more frequently in the later period (14 out of 17, 82%). Surgical interventions were favored in the earlier period, whereas interventional radiologic approaches were selected for later events. Overall 3‐ and 5‐year survival rates were 81% and 77%, respectively, in patients with PV complications and 88% and 84%, respectively, in those without PV complications (P = 0.21, log‐rank test). PV complications are a significant problem following LDLT with both early and late manifestations. Acceptable long‐term results, however, are achievable with periodic ultrasonographic surveillance and timely conventional therapeutic interventions. The use of cryo‐preserved vein grafts for reconstructing portal flow should be discouraged.     

终末期肝病合并门静脉血栓患者的肝移植术(附四例报告)

目的 探讨终末期肝病合并门静脉血栓(PVT)患者的肝移植术。方法 对准备肝移植的受者常规应用CT和彩色多普勒检查，发现共有4例受者伴有PVT。此4例受者进行了原位肝移植术和门静脉血栓摘除治疗。术中对残留有附壁血栓的1例受者，在肠系膜上静脉分支处插入一带有肝素帽的导管，术后用于注入尿激酶进行溶栓治疗。术后所有受者均应用了低分子肝素、华法令和前列腺素E1等抗凝治疗。结果 术中一次性取尽血栓3例；1例受者PVT延及脾静脉人口和门脉左右支，术后门静脉残留有血栓，经溶栓和抗凝治疗，术后28d血栓消失。有3例受者在术后2个月内痊愈出院，随访至今情况良好；1例受者因胸腔穿刺并发出血，后发生多房性积液和肺部感染，于术后48d死亡。结论(1)PVT不是肝移植的绝对禁忌证；(2)外科摘除血栓、溶栓和抗凝治疗能对PVT进行根治；(3)出血是肝移植门静脉血栓治疗后的主要并发症，要加强预防和治疗。     

Thrombosis Confined to the Portal Vein Is Not a Contraindication for Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of agreement regarding preexisting portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We report the results of a single-center study to determine the impact of PVT on outcomes of adult LDLT recipients. METHODS: Of 133 cases of adult LDLT performed between January 2000 and December 2004, a thrombectomy was performed on 22 patients (16.5%) with PVT during the transplant procedure. One hundred eleven patients without PVT (group 1) were compared with those with a thrombosis confined to the portal vein (group 2; n = 15) and patients with the thrombosis beyond the portal vein (group 3; n = 7). RESULTS: The sensitivities of Doppler ultrasound and CT in detecting PVT were 50 and 63.6%. A prior history of variceal bleeding (OR = 10.6, p = 0.002) and surgical shunt surgery (OR = 28.1, p = 0.044) were found to be an independent risk factors for PVT. The rate of postoperative PVT was significantly higher in patients with PVT than in those without (18.2 vs. 2.7%; p = 0.014). In particular, the rethrombosis rate in group 3 was 28.6%. The actuarial 3-year patient survival rate in PVT patients (73.6%) was similar to that of the non-PVT patients (85.3%; p = 0.351). However, the actuarial 3-year patient survival rate in group 3 was 38.1%, which was significantly lower than that in groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: A thrombosis confined to the portal vein per se should not be considered a contraindication for LDLT.     

Preoperative indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreas cancer involving the portal vein.

This retrospective study attempted to determine the indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced carcinoma of the pancreas, in terms of postoperative prognosis. An extended pancreatectomy with portal vein or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection and regional lymphadenectomy was performed in 35 of 50 consecutive cancers that extended into the retroperitoneal spaces and involved the PV or SMV. Among the many background factors in the 35 resected specimens, the degree of PV/SMV invasion by the cancer was most closely associated with prognosis, despite resection of all involved PV/SMV. This factor generally correlated with the preoperative findings on the portal phase of superior mesenteric arteriograph. In 17 selected patients in whom PV/SMV invasion had been angiographically both semicircular or less and 1.2 cm (1.4 cm on the film) or less in length, the 3-year survival rate was 59%. This survival rate was significantly higher than the 29% 3-year survival rate in all 35 patients (p less than 0.05). Conversely, among the 18 patients in whom invasion was angiographically either beyond semicircular or more than 1.2 cm (1.4 cm on the film) in length, there were no 1.5-year survivors, and this result was even worse than that of 15 nonresectable cases. Based on postoperative survival, the degrees of PV/SMV invasion on preoperative angiography (narrowing pattern and length) are good indicators for aggressive pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Multiple Ways to Manage Portal Thrombosis During Liver Transplantation: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes

Background

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a well-recognized complication of chronic liver disease with a prevalence ranging from 1% to 16%.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 447 consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation (OLT) between October 2000 and December 2011 comparing 51 recipients with PVT (study group) with 399 without PVT (control group). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of pre-existent PVT on the surgical procedure, to identify specific preventable perioperative complications, and based on our studies and other works, to determine whether this group of patients are acceptable candidates for OLT.

Results

Among the 51 patients with PVT, 44 showed partial and 7 complete thrombosis. In 47 cases, we performed a thromboendovenectomy. There were six anastomoses at the confluence of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and one, with a venous graft interposition. In four complete thrombosis recipients we performed an extra-anatomic by pass between the main trunk of the SMV and the donor portal vein. Compared with the control group, regarding preoperative characteristics, PVT patients were older at the time of transplantation (P = .001) and had a higher use of TIPS (P = .02). The operative characteristics showed a longer warm ischemia time in the PVT group (46.9 ± 22.5 vs 39.3 ± 15 min; P = .004). There were significant differences in postoperative evaluations, nor in the complication rates. Overall survivals at 10 years were similar: 61.7% versus 65.3%; (P = .9).

Conclusion

Although PVT was associated with greater operative complexity, it had no influence on postoperative complications or overall survival.     

Portal vein thrombosis in adults undergoing liver transplantation: risk factors, screening, management, and outcome

BACKGROUND: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been seen as an obstacle to liver transplantation (LTx). Recent data suggest that favorable results may be achieved in this group of patients but only limited information from small size series is available. The present study was conducted in an effort to review the surgical options in patients with PVT and to assess the impact of PVT on LTx outcome. Risk factors for PVT and the value of screening tools are also analyzed. METHODS: Adult LTx performed from 1987 through 1996 were reviewed. PVT was retrospectively graded according to the operative findings: grade 1: <50% PVT +/- minimal obstruction of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV); grade 2: grade 1 but >50% PVT; grade 3: complete PV and proximal SMV thrombosis; grade 4: complete PV and entire SMV thrombosis. RESULTS: Of 779 LTx, 63 had operatively confirmed PVT (8.1%): 24 had grade 1, 23 grade 2, 6 grade 3, and 10 grade 4 PVT. Being male, treatment for portal hypertension, Child-Pugh class C, and alcoholic liver disease were associated with PVT. Sensitivity of ultrasound (US) in detecting PVT increased with PVT grade and was 100% in grades 3-4. In patients with US-diagnosed PVT, an angiogram was performed and ruled out a false positive US diagnosis in 13%. In contrast with US, angiograms differentiated grade 1 from grade 2, and grade 3 from grade 4 PVT. Grade 1 and 2 PVT were managed by low dissection and/or a thrombectomy; in grade 3 the distal SMV was directly used as an inflow vessel, usually through an interposition donor iliac vein; in grade 4 a splanchnic tributary was used or a thrombectomy was attempted. Transfusion requirements in PVT patients (10 U) were higher than in non-PVT patients (5 U) (P<0.01). In-hospital mortality for PVT patients was 30% versus 12.4% in controls (P<0.01). Patients with PVT had more postoperative complications, renal failure, primary nonfunction, and PV rethrombosis. The overall actuarial 5-year patient survival rate in PVT patients (65.6%) was lower than in controls (76.3%; P=0.04). Patients with grade 1 PVT, however, had a 5-year survival rate (86%) identical to that of controls, whereas patients with grades 2, 3, and 4 PVT had reduced survival rates. The 5-year patient survival rate improved from the 1st to the 2nd era in non-PVT patients (from 72% to 83%; P<0.01), in grade 1 PVT (from 53% to 100%; P<0.01), and in grades 2 to 4 PVT (from 38% to 62%; P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The value of US diagnosis in patients with PVT depends on the PVT grade, and false negative diagnoses occur only in incomplete forms of PVT (grades 1-2). The degree of PVT dictates the surgical strategy to be used, thrombectomy/low dissection in grade 1-2, mesoportal jump graft in grade 3, and a splanchnic tributary in grade 4. Taken altogether, PVT patients undergo more difficult surgery, have more postoperative complications, have higher in-hospital mortality rates, and have reduced 5-year survival rates. Analysis by PVT grade, however, reveals that grade 1 PVT patients do as well as controls; only grades 2 to 4 PVT patients have poorer outcomes. With increased experience, results of LTx in PVT patients have improved and, even in severe forms of PVT, a 5-year survival rate >60% can now be achieved.     

Indication for the use of an interposed graft during portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein reconstruction in pancreatic resection based on perioperative outcomes

Purpose

Combined portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection with pancreatic resection sometimes leads to prolonged survival for patients with pancreatic cancer. In this study, we evaluated perioperative outcomes of patients with PV/SMV reconstruction and considered indications for the use of a graft during this procedure.

Methods

We performed PV/SMV resection with pancreatic resection in 128 patients, including 14 using grafts. Complications associated with PV/SMV reconstruction and harvesting venous grafts and reconstructed PV/SMV patency during follow-up were assessed.

Results

Of the 128 patients, 5 underwent total pancreatectomy, 99 pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 24 distal pancreatectomy. In the 14 patients who underwent PV/SMV reconstruction with grafts, the grafts were harvested from the external iliac vein (EIV) in 10 patients and internal jugular vein (IJV) in the other 4. Five patients (3.9 %) had an intraoperative or postoperative acute thrombus or stenosis of reconstructed PV/SMV after direct end-to-end anastomosis. However, PV/SMV patency was excellent after reconstruction using grafts. There were no significant differences in other complications between groups with and without the use of grafts. Three patients (30 %) with EIV grafts had postoperative leg edema, and one of them required analgesics until his death because of leg pain caused by compartment syndrome, whereas no patients with IJV grafts had complications associated with sacrificing veins.

Conclusions

Depending on the length and/or position of the removed PV/SMV segment, interposed graft may be required for reconstruction in some patients, and the use of graft vein, particularly using IJV, is an appropriate procedure that is not associated with any complications.     

Portal vein complications in the long-term course after pediatric living donor liver transplantation

The frequency and the outcome of patients with portal vein (PV) complications in the long-term course after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have rarely been reported. Between June 1990 and September 2003, 527 pediatric patients underwent primary LDLT with left lobe grafts, among which 479 patients with functioning grafts at 3 months after LDLT were included in this analysis. The ages ranged from 29 days to 17 years, 3 months (median: 1 year, 9 months) and body weight from 3.1 kg to 62.4 kg (median: 9.6 kg). Biliary cirrhosis was the most common cause for LDLT (81%). The PV was anastomosed with or without a vein graft. Thirty-nine patients (8%) showed a PV complication (stenosis: 16; obstruction: 17; thrombus: 2; twist: 3). Their ages ranged from 4 months to 17 years, 3 months (median: 1 year) and their body weight from 3.8 kg to 44.8 kg (median: 8.5 kg) at operation. PV complications were detected between 4 and 116 months (median: 14 months) after the transplant. Splenomegaly and decreased platelet counts were observed in more than 90% of the patients with a PV complication. In 27 patients (71%), interventional venoplasty was successful. Eleven patients had obstruction of the PV (2.3%) including three who showed cirrhosis; one with severe pulmonary hypertension; one death after retransplantation; and one alive after retransplantation. Moderate fibrosis was found in two patients at 3 and 2 years after the procedure, one of whom had the complication of a moderate intrapulmonary shunt. Early detection of PV stenosis with these two markers can lead to successful angioplasty and avoid graft loss.     

Umbilical portion of recipient's left portal vein: a useful vascular conduit in dual living donor liver transplantation for the thrombosed portal vein.

We considered performing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in a larger-size recipient. When the recipient was large-sized, or when the donor liver was severely steatotic or had a right-to-left volume discrepancy. We devised dual living donor liver transplantation (DLDLT) to make up for graft size insufficiency and to secure the donor's safety. However, portal vein thrombosis (PVT) presented a challenge for DLDLT because of the need for intact right and left portal veins for the implantation of both liver grafts. Our 52-year-old male patient with hepatitis B cirrhosis had suffered from repeated esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding and underwent 2 trials of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). He developed TIPS occlusion and PVT involving the area just above the spleno-mesenteric confluence to the right and left PV. Also, the right PV orifice was destructed and difficult to isolate because of severe periportal inflammation and neointima growth in the TIPS mesh. The patient's two sons were inadequate for donation because of right-to-left volume discrepancy. Therefore, DLDLT using 2 left lobes was necessary to compensate for graft-size insufficiency and to secure donor safety, and we substituted an intact umbilical portion of recipient's left PV for the destroyed right PV. The patient recovered well, and liver function has been normal for more than a year. In conclusion, the umbilical portion of recipient's left PV can be a useful vascular substitute for the reconstruction of a thrombosed main portal branch in DLDLT.     

Renoportal anastomosis in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: report of a case

End-stage liver disease is often accompanied by thrombosis of the portal vein and the formation of splanchnic collateral vessels. Successful liver transplantation in such situations is more likely if the surgeon uses a strategy to establish a graft inflow. A 59-year-old male with a decompensated liver secondary to idiopathic portal hypertension underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a right lobe liver graft donated from his son. His portal venous trunk was atrophied and a splenorenal shunt drained the mesenteric venous flow into the systemic circulation. LDLT was performed with renoportal anastomosis (RPA) using his right internal jugular vein as an interposed venous graft, without dissecting the collateral vessels. Although he developed temporary functional hyperbilirubinemia, he was discharged from the hospital 23 days after LDLT. This case suggests that RPA is a useful technique to manage patients with an obstructed portal vein and a splenorenal shunt.     

Using Pericholedochal Varix Inflow for Complete Portal Vein Thrombosis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

One of the crucial steps of liver transplantation is to provide the portal inflow. Portal vein thrombosis is the most challenging factor to achieve. Using a pericholedochal varix for portal inflow in a patient with complete portal vein thrombosis in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a rare technique. We present our experience of a LDLT with PVT.     

Management of portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: influence on morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND: Splanchnic thrombosis is a surgical challenge in liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to analyze our experience in the management of portal vein thrombosis, and its influence on evolution. AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze our experience in the management of portal vein thrombosis, and its influence on evolution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, 366 liver transplants were performed in 335 patients. Forty-two patients [12.5%: portal vein thrombosis (PVT) group] had portal thrombosis at the time of LT. We analyzed the technical aspects and compared their evolution with a group of patients without portal thrombosis (n = 293; no-PVT group). Retransplantations were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients with thrombosis, 18 had partial thrombosis and 16 complete thrombosis [six included the proximal superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and in two the whole splanchnic system]. In 12 cases, usual T-T anastomosis was performed and in 16 cases a thrombectomy was carried out; there were five cases of anastomosis at confluence of the SMV, five cases of anastomosis to a collateral vein, three cases of venous graft, and one case of cavoportal hemitransposition. The operative time was higher in PVT group (417 +/- 103 min vs. 363 +/- 83; p = 0.0005), as RBC transfusion (2.4 +/- 3.1 vs. 1.9 +/- 2.3; p = 0.04), and hospital stay (20.9 +/- 14.9 d vs. 15.1 +/- 10.6; p = 0.002). However, there were no differences in hospital mortality (4% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.98), primary dysfunction (4.8% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.44), or three-yr-actuarial survival (75% vs. 77%; p = 0.95). The incidence of post-transplant thrombosis was higher in the PVT group (15% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Portal thrombosis is associated with greater operative complexity and rethrombosis, but has no influence on overall morbidity and mortality.