Biologic response to desmopressin in patients with severe type 1 and type 2 von Willebrand disease: results of a multicenter European study

This study prospectively evaluated the rate of biologic response to desmopressin (DDAVP) in 66 patients with type 1 or 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD), each of whom had, on the basis of available records, a clinically significant bleeding history and at least one of the following laboratory abnormalities: bleeding time (BT) longer than 15 minutes, ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) less than 10 IU/dL, factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) less than 20 IU/dL (severe VWD). Before the study, responsive patients were defined as those who, 2 hours after infusion of 0.3 microg/kg DDAVP, had increased baseline values of VWF:RCo and FVIII:C by at least 3-fold and achieved levels of at least 30 IU/dL for both and a BT of 12 minutes or less. The rate of biologic response varied according to VWD types and was higher in type 1 (7 of 26, 27%) than in type 2 (7 of 40, 18%) (type 2A [1 of 15, 7%], type 2M [3 of 21, 14%], type 2N [3 of 4, 75%]). Mutations in the VWF gene were previously known or newly identified in most patients with types 2A (n = 15 of 15), 2M (n = 15 of 21), and 2N (n = 4 of 4), but in none of those with type 1 VWD. Genotype provided more information than phenotype in predicting individual responses to DDAVP only in patients with 2A and 2N VWD. This prospective study showed that the rate of biologic response to DDAVP is relatively low not only in type 2 but also in type 1 VWD when uniform and stringent criteria for patient selection and responsiveness are applied.     

Characterization of recessive severe type 1 and 3 von Willebrand Disease (VWD), asymptomatic heterozygous carriers versus bloodgroup O-related von Willebrand factor deficiency, and dominant type 1 VWD.

Recessive type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by homozygosity or double heterozygosity for two non-sense mutations (null alleles). Type 3 VWD is easy to diagnose by the combination of a strongly prolonged bleeding time (BT), absence of ristocetine-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA), absence of von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein, and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) due to factor VIII:coagulant (FVIII:C) deficiency. VWD type 3 is associated with a pronounced tendency to mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal bleedings since early childhood. Carriers of one null allele are usually asymptomatic at VWF levels of 50% of normal. Recessive severe type 1 VWD is caused by homozygosity or double heterozygosity for a missense mutation. Recessive type 1 VWD differs from type 3 VWD by the presence of detectable von Willebrand factor: antigen VWF:Ag and FVIII:C levels between 0.09 and 0.40 U/mL. Patients with recessive type 1 VWD show an abnormal VWF multimeric pattern in plasma and/or platelets consistent with severe type 2 VWD. Carriers of a missense mutation may have mild bleeding and mild VWF deficiency and can be diagnosed by a double VWF peak on cross immunoelectrophoresis (CIE). There will be cases of mild and moderate recessive type 1 VWD due to double heterozygosity of two missense mutations, or with the combination of one missense mutation with a non-sense or bloodgroup O. Mild deficiency of VWF in the range of 0.20 to 0.60 U/mL, with normal ratios of von Willebrand factor: ristocetine cofactor/antigen VWF:RCo/Ag and VWF:collagen binding/antigen (VWF:CB/Ag), normal VWF multimers, and a completely normal response to desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) with VWF level rising from below to above 1.00 U/mL are very likely cases of so-called pseudo-VWF deficiency in individuals with normal VWF protein and gene. Autosomal dominant type 1 VWD variants are in fact type 2 variants caused by a heterozygous missense mutation in the VWF gene that produces a mutant VWF protein that has a dominant effect on normal VWF protein produced by the normal VWF allele with regard to the synthesis, processing, storage, secretion, and/or proteolysis of VWF in endothelial cells. A DDAVP challenge test clearly differentiates between dominant type 1 VWD phenotype and dominant type 2 M VWD.     

Diagnosis and management of adult patients with von Willebrand disease in South Australia

We have analyzed the databases for von Willebrand disease (VWD) from the hemophilia center for adult patients with bleeding disorders in South Australia. We define the prevalence of types of VWD to determine the proportion of who would be treated with factor (F) VIII/von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrate to prevent or control hemorrhage. In severe or moderately severe patients, we use plasma-derived FVIII/VWF concentrate, and for mild to severe cases, we use desmopressin plus tranexamic acid. There are 103 patients with VWF ristocetin (RCo) ≤50 IU/dL: 38 (37%) severe (VWF:RCo <10 IU/dL), 28 (27%) moderate (VWF:RCo 10 to 29 IU/dL), and 37 (36%) mild (VWF:RCo 30 to 50 IU/dL). Hence in 66 (64%), FVIII/VWF concentrate is the mainstay of treatment. The prevalence of VWD in our region according to data from our center is ~1 per 12,000. A total of 52% of patients are type 1, 44% type 2, and 5% type 3. In our experience, type 2M (45% of type 2) is much more common than types 2A and 2B (each 9% of type 2). Mutation detection is useful for identifying some subtypes of VWD.     

Intravenous DDAVP and factor VIII-von Willebrand factor concentrate for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleedings in patients With von Willebrand disease type 1, 2 and 3.

The current standard set of von Willebrand factor (VWF) parameters used to differentiate type 1 from type 2 VWD include bleeding times (BTs), factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetine cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), VWF collagen binding activity (VWF:CB), ristocetine induced platelet aggregation (RIPA), and analysis of VWF multimers in low and high resolution agarose gels and the response to DDAVP. The BTs and RIPA are normal in asymptomatic carriers of a mutant VWF allele, in dominant type 1, and in recessive type 2N VWD, and this category has a normal response of VWF parameters to DDAVP. The response of FVIII:C is compromised in type 2N VWD. The BTs and RIPA are usually normal in type Vicenza and mild type 2A VWD, and these two VWD variants show a transiently good response of BT and VWF parameters followed by short in vivo half life times of VWF parameters. The BTS are strongly prolonged and RIPA typically absent in recessive severe type 1 and 3 VWD, in dominant type 2A and in recessive type 2C (very likely also 2D) VWD and consequently associated with low or absent platelet VWF, and no or poor response of VWF parameters to DDAVP. The BTs are prolonged and RIPA increased in dominant type 2B VWD, that is featured by normal platelet VWF and a poor response of BT and functional VWF to DDAVP. The BTs are prolonged and RIPA decreased in dominant type 2A and 2U, that all have low VWF platelet, very low VWF:RCo values as compared to VWF:Ag, and a poor response of functional VWF to DDAVP. VWD type 2M is featured by the presence of all VWF multimers in a low resolution agarose gel, normal or slightly prolonged BT, decreased RIPA, a poor response of VWF:RCo and a good response of FVIII and VWF:CB to DDAVP and therefore clearly in between dominant type 1 and 2U. The existing recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment of bleedings in type 2 VWD patients with FVIII/VWF concentrates are mainly derived from pharmocokinetic studies in type 3 VWD patients. FVIII/VWF concentrates should be characterised by labelling with FVIII:C, VWF:RCo, VWF:CB and VWF multimeric pattern to determine their safety and efficacy in prospective management studies. As the bleeding tendency is moderate in type 2 and severe in type 3 VWD and the FVIII:C levels are near normal in type 2 and very low in type 3 VWD patients. Proper recommendations of FVIII/VWF concentrates using VWF:RCo unit dosing for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes are proposed and has to be stratified for the severity of bleeding, the type of surgery either minor or major and for type 2 and type 3 VWD as well.     

von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrate (Humate‐P) for management of elective surgery in adults and children with von Willebrand disease

Summary. von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Treatment guidelines recommend the use of von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrate for VWD patients with type 2 or 3 VWD undergoing surgery, and type 1 patients undergoing surgery who are unresponsive, or for whom desmopressin acetate is contraindicated. This prospective, open‐label, multinational study evaluated the safety, efficacy and optimal dosing of a VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate‐P) in subjects with VWD undergoing elective surgery. Dosing was based on VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) and FVIII pharmacokinetic assessments performed before surgery. Pharmacokinetic assessments were completed in 33 adults and 9 children. Haemostatic efficacy was assessed on a 4‐point scale (excellent, good, moderate/poor or none). Overall effective haemostasis was achieved in 32/35 subjects. Median terminal VWF:RCo half‐life was 11.7 h, and median incremental in vivo recovery was 2.4 IU dL^?1 per IU kg^?1 infused. Major haemorrhage occurred after surgery in 3/35 cases despite achieving target VWF and FVIII levels. Median VWF/FVIII concentrate loading doses ranged from 42.6 IU VWF:RCo kg^?1 (oral surgery) to 61.2 IU VWF:RCo kg^?1 (major surgery), with a median of 10 (range, 2–55) doses administered per subject. Adverse events considered possibly treatment‐related (n = 6) were generally mild and of short duration. The results indicate that this VWF/FVIII concentrate is safe and effective in the prevention of excessive bleeding during and after surgery in individuals with VWD.     

von Willebrand disease R1374C: Type 2A or 2M? A challenge to the revised classification. High frequency in the northwest of Spain (Galicia)

Patients initially diagnosed with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) have been reclassified as type 2 after a more exhaustive analysis in several studies. Our study's objectives were (1) to reanalyze patients that were previously diagnosed as type 1 to achieve a more accurate diagnosis and (2) to compare the von Willebrand factor (VWF) ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) and the VWF collagen binding assay (VWF:CB) in order to evaluate the possibility of replacing the former assay with the latter in the diagnosis of VWD. Twenty-one patients from two large unrelated families and 104 normal controls were studied. VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), bleeding time (BT), PFA(100), and multimeric analysis of VWF were tested. Genetic analysis by sequencing exon 28 on the VWF gene was also carried out. Patients presented lower levels of VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo, a dissociation between VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag, and the presence of all sizes of multimers in plasma VWF. The results for VWF:CB varied depending on the type of collagen used. The genetic analysis showed that the mutation R1374C is responsible for type 2M VWD. A high frequency of the R1374C mutation is observed in northwestern Spain (Galicia). Some types of 2M VWD are misdiagnosed as type 1 VWD. The VWF:CB (with type I collagen) assay was unable to discriminate defective platelet binding of the R1374C VWF. This confirms that VWF:CB cannot substitute for VWF:RCo, and both should be tested when diagnosing VWD.     

Presurgical pharmacokinetic analysis of a von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrate in patients with von Willebrand’s disease (VWD) has limited value in dosing for surgery

Summary. Optimal doses of von Willebrand Factor/Factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrates for surgical procedures in patients with VWD need to be determined. A prospective, multicenter study was performed that included an initial pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment following a standard dose of VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate‐P^®) to determine individual PK parameters and guide therapeutic dosing during surgery. Forty one subjects received 60 IU kg^?1 VWF: RCo. Median plasma levels, half‐life, mean change from baseline and in vivo recovery (IVR) values were determined for VWF:RCo, VWF:Ag, and FVIII: C, and area under the plasma time‐concentration curve (AUC), mean residence time (MRT), clearance, volume of distribution and dose linearity were also assessed for VWF:RCo at various time points. Median baseline VWF:RCo level was 13 IU dL^?1 (range, 6–124); with a mean change from baseline >100 IU dL^?1 immediately after the infusion, decreasing to 10 IU dL^?1 at 48 h postinfusion. The group median incremental in vivo recovery (IVR) for VWF:RCo was 2.4 IU dL^?1 per IU kg^?1, for VWF:Ag 2.3 IU dL^?1 kg^?1 and for FVIII:C was 2.7 IU dL^?1 per IU kg^?1. When analysing individual recovery values on repeated infusions, a very weak correlation was observed between presurgery IVR and IVR for both VWF:RCo and FVIII, measured at various times just prior to and after the surgical procedure. Although group median values were fairly consistent among repeated IVR measurements, the intra‐individual IVR values for FVIII and VWF:RCo with repeated infusions showed a large degree of variability. IVR values obtained from pharmacokinetic analyses performed in advance of anticipated surgery do not reliably predict postinfusion circulating levels of VWF:RCo or FVIII attained preoperatively or with subsequent peri‐operative infusions.     

Outgrowing the laboratory diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand disease: A two decade study

Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) levels are known to increase with age in the general population, but that effect is unclear in von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients. Thus, it is important to assess the trends of VWF levels with age, and the extent and rate of their normalization in patients with VWD. In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of 126 patients between 1996 and 2016 who met the NHLBI diagnostic criteria for type 1 VWD or “Low VWF” (LVWF). We followed all their historically documented VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF activity (VWF:RCo), and Factor VIII (FVIII) levels longitudinally over time, correlating data with clinical setting at time of testing. The average duration of follow‐up was 10.5 ± 3.7 years (SD). Out of the total study population, 27.8% achieved the primary outcome of complete normalization (CN) of both VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels, including 19.6% and 32.5% of those with VWD and LVWF, respectively. Linear regression demonstrated statistically significant positive trends of VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, FVIII with time, calculated at 2.4, 1.4, and 1.4 U dL‐1/year, respectively (P < .001 each). In the largest study population of VWD patients to date whose levels were followed longitudinally, there is a statistically significant rise in VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and FVIII levels observed with time. CN of both VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels was observed in almost a third of patients with VWD or LVWF, over an average of 10 years. Whether the bleeding phenotype also improves is unclear and requires further study.     

Successful treatment for patients with von Willebrand disease undergoing urgent surgery using factor VIII/VWF concentrate (Humate-P®)

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by insufficient von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity. It has been proposed that VWF:ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity may be useful in evaluating the response to VWD treatment in patients who require replacement therapy. This prospective, open-label, non-randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a factor VIII (FVIII)/VWF concentrate (Humate-P) used in treatment regimens based on VWF:RCo activity in subjects with VWD in situations requiring urgent and necessary surgery. This article summarizes the results for 39 subjects with 42 evaluable surgical treatment events, 100% of which were rated as excellent/good for overall efficacy (achievement of haemostasis). The median loading dose based upon VWF:RCo activity was 82.3 international units/kilogram (IU kg(-1); range 32.5-216.8 IU kg(-1)), and the median maintenance dose per infusion was 52.8 IU kg(-1) (range 24.2-196.5 IU kg(-1)) for a median of 3 days (range 1-50 days). The median number of infusions per event was 6 (range 1-67 infusions). Three unanticipated adverse events (peripheral oedema, extremity pain and pseudo-thrombocytopenia) from two surgical treatment events were reported that were potentially treatment-related. No serious drug-related adverse events (AEs) were observed, and no thrombotic events were reported in this study. This study supports the safety and efficacy of the FVIII/VWF concentrate Humate-P for the prevention of surgical haemorrhage in patients with VWD when administered in doses calculated in VWF:RCo units.     

Identification of type 1 von Willebrand disease patients with reduced von Willebrand factor survival by assay of the VWF propeptide in the European study: molecular and clinical markers for the diagnosis and management of type 1 VWD (MCMDM-1VWD)

The decreased survival of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in plasma has been implicated as a mechanism in a subset of type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients. We have previously reported that the ratio of plasma levels of VWF and its propeptide (VWFpp) can be used to identify patients with reduced VWF survival. In this study, we report the assay of VWFpp and VWF:Ag in 19 individuals recruited from 6 European centers within the MCMDM-1VWD study. Eight individuals had a VWF:Ag level less than 30 IU/dL. Seven of these patients had a robust desmopressin response and significantly reduced VWF half-life that was predicted by a markedly increased steady-state plasma VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio. VWF mutations previously associated with reduced VWF survival were identified in each of the 7 individuals. Thus, a substantially increased ratio of steady-state VWFpp/VWF:Ag predicted a reduced VWF half-life in patients with markedly decreased VWF:Ag levels. These data indicate that a reduced VWF survival is found in a subpopulation of patients with type 1 VWD. The systematic assay of both plasma VWF and the VWF propeptide in moderately severe type 1 VWD patients may identify patients with a reduced VWF survival phenotype.      

Correlation between von Willebrand factor antigen,von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity and factor VIII activity in plasma

Background The laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand Factor (VWF) deficiencies includes qualitative and quantitative measurements of VWF and clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Since the FVIII activity is frequently normal in patients with mild type 1 or 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD), there is controversy whether FVIII testing should accompany VWF Antigen (VWF:Ag) assay. Methods The aim of this study was to explore the correlation between VWF:Ag, VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) and FVIII in 213 consecutive patients undergoing screening for VWD. Results Forty-six patients were identified with VWF:Ag levels lower than the diagnostic threshold (54 IU/dl). A significant correlation was observed between VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo (r = 0.892; p < 0.001), VWF:Ag and FVIII (r = 0.834; p < 0.001), VWF:RCo and FVIII (r = 0.758; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the VWF:Ag assay revealed an area under the curve of 0.978 and 0.957 for detecting life-threatening values of FVIII (<30 IU/dl) and VWF:RCo (<40 IU/dl), respectively. The negative and positive predictive values at the VWF:Ag threshold value of 54 IU/dl were 100% and 33% for detecting life-threatening FVIII deficiencies, 94% and 80% for identifying abnormal values of VWF:RCo. Conclusions Due to the excellent correlation between VWF:Ag and FVIII and to the diagnostic efficiency of VWF:Ag for identifying abnormal FVIII levels in patients with VWF deficiency, routine measurement of FVIII may not be necessary in the initial screening of patients with suspected VWD. However, the limited negative predictive value of VWF:Ag for identifying type 2 VWD does not allow to eliminate VWF:RCo or VWF:FVIIIB assays from the diagnostic workout.     

Similarity in joint and mucous bleeding syndromes in type 2N von Willebrand disease and severe hemophilia A coexisting with type 1 von Willebrand disease in two Chinese pedigrees

In this study, we investigated the molecular basis of two unrelated Chinese patients with hemostatic disorders. The proband of the first family had severe hemophilia A (HA) coexisting with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) and the proband of the second family had type 2N VWD. Both probands had similar phenotypes, which included joint and mucosal bleeding, very low factor VIII (FVIII) activity (FVIII:C), and moderate reductions in VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:Rco), as well as a normal multimeric pattern. One FVIII mutation and three VWF mutations were identified: FVIII p.R446* and VWF heterozygous p.E216K mutations were detected in proband 1 and compound heterozygosity of VWF mutations (p.R816W and c.1911delC) in proband 2. Transient expression studies in HEK293T cells proved that R816W mutation abolished the binding of FVIII to VWF and slightly impaired protein synthesis and secretion; 1911delC mutation mainly impaired VWF protein synthesis and secretion. These results provided insight into the possible pathogenic mechanism of type 2N VWD in Chinese patients carrying these mutations.     

Diagnosis of inherited von Willebrand disease: comparison of two methodologies and analysis of the discrepancies

Diagnostics of von Willebrand disease (VWD) includes assessment of factor VIII (FVIII) coagulant activity, von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), and more specific tests as multimeric and genetic analyses are necessary for the correct VWD classification. The ACL AcuStar? analyzer introduces chemiluminescence (CL) technology in detection of VWD with automated VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays. Compare VWF:Ag‐ELISA and VWF:RCo by aggregometry conventional assays with new CL VWF:Ag‐IL and VWF:RCo‐IL assays, investigate the ability to make accurate VWD diagnosis and concordance with multimeric and genetic analyses. 146 patients with congenital VWD (51 Type 1; 34 Type2A; 16 Type 2B; 31 Type 2M; 5 Type 2N; 9 Type 3) and 30 healthy normal subjects were included. A comparison was made between CL and conventional methods. Diagnostic evaluation included: VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio, multimeric distribution (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]‐agarose gel) of VWF and genetic analysis in 110 of 146 patients. CL and conventional methods revealed good correlation. Kappa test agreement diagnosis was >0.8. CL diagnostic sensitivity was 100% and specificity 97%. Multimeric and genetic analysis were of help in clarifying 13 discrepancies of diagnosis between methods, of which six discrepancies were explained by lack of conventional methods′ sensibility. CL methodology can detect VWD and discriminate between type 1, 3 and variant forms and offers an automated, faster, sensitive and less cumbersome method when compared to conventional assays, in particular VWF:RCo by aggregometry. In some cases, even with all phenotype and genetic analyses, discrepancies exist in the classification of VWD.     

Changing insights in the diagnosis and classification of autosomal recessive and dominant von Willebrand diseases 1980-2015

The European Clinical Laboratory and Molecular (ECLM) criteria define 10 distinct Willebrand diseases (VWD): recessive type 3, severe 1, 2C and 2N; dominant VWD type 1 secretion/clearance defect, 2A, 2B, 2E, 2M and 2D; and mild type 1 VWD (usually carriers of recessive VWD). Recessive severe 1 and 2C VWD are characterized by secretion and multimerization defects caused by mutations in the D1-D2 domain. Recessive 2N VWD is a mild hemophilia due to D’-FVIII-von Willebrand factor (VWF) binding site mutations. Dominant 2E VWD caused by heterozygous missense mutations in the D3 domain is featured by a secretion-clearance-multimerization VWF defect. Dominant VWD type 2M due to loss of function mutations in the A1 domain is characterized by decreased ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation and VWF:RCo, normal VWF multimers and VWF:CB, a poor response of VWF:RCo and good response of VWF:CB to desmopressin (DDAVP). Dominant VWD type 2A induced by heterozygous mutations in the A2 domain results in hypersensitivity of VWF for proteolysis by ADAMTS13 into VWF degradation products, resulting in loss of large VWF multimers with triplet structure of each individual VWF band. Dominant VWD type 2B due to a gain of function mutation in the A1 domain is featured by spontaneous interaction between platelet glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) and mutated VWF A1 followed by increased proteolysis with loss of large VWF multimers and presence of each VWF band. A new category of dominant VWD type 1 secretion or clearance defect due to mutations in the D3 domain or D4-C1-C5 domains consists of two groups: Those with normal or smeary pattern of VWF multimers.     

Successful treatment of urgent bleeding in von Willebrand disease with factor VIII/VWF concentrate (Humate-P®): use of the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) to measure potency and to guide therapy

This prospective, open-label, non-randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of factor VIII (FVIII)/von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentrate (Humate-P) using treatment regimens based on VWF:ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity in patients with von Willebrand Disease (VWD) in (i) urgent bleeding episodes, or (ii) in patients undergoing urgent and necessary surgery. This article summarizes the results of treatment for the 33 patients with 53 urgent bleeding events. The median loading dose of FVIII/VWF concentrate was 67.0 international units per kilogram (IU kg(-1)) VWF:RCo (range 25.7-143.2 IU kg(-1)), and the median daily maintenance dose per infusion was 74.0 IU kg(-1) (range 16.4-182.9 IU kg(-1)) for a median duration of 2 days (range 1-34 days). The overall efficacy (achievement of haemostasis) of FVIII/VWF concentrate was rated as excellent/good for 98% of the urgent bleeding events. No unexpected treatment-related adverse events or serious drug-related adverse events (AEs) were observed. This study supports the safety and efficacy of Humate-P administered in doses calculated in VWF:RCo units for the treatment of urgent bleeding episodes in patients with VWD.     

Gain-of-function GPIb ELISA assay for VWF activity in the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder, but diagnosis is sometimes challenging because of issues with the current von Willebrand factor (VWF) assays, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), used for diagnosis. We evaluated 113 healthy controls and 164 VWD subjects enrolled in the T.S. Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD for VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay of VWF-glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) interactions using a gain-of-function GPIb construct (tGPIbα(235Y;239V)) as a receptor to bind its ligand VWF in an assay independent of ristocetin (VWF:IbCo ELISA). Healthy controls, type 1, 2A, 2M, and 2N subjects had VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios similar to the ratio obtained with VWF:IbCo ELISA/VWF:Ag. Type 2B VWD subjects, however, had elevated VWF:IbCo ELISA/VWF:Ag ratios. Type 3 VWD subjects had undetectable (< 1.6 U/dL) VWF:IbCo ELISA values. As previously reported, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio was decreased with a common A1 domain polymorphism, D1472H, as was direct binding to ristocetin for a 1472H A1 loop construct. The VWF:IbCo ELISA, however, was not affected by D1472H. The VWF:IbCo ELISA may be useful in testing VWF binding to GPIb, discrimination of type 2 variants, and in the diagnosis of VWD as it avoids some of the pitfalls of VWF:RCo assays.     

Classification and characterization of hereditary types 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2M, 2N, and 2U (unclassifiable) von Willebrand disease.

All variants of type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients, except 2N, show a defective von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein (on cross immunoelectrophoresis or multimeric analysis), decreased ratios for VWF:RCo/Ag and VWF:CB/Ag and prolonged bleeding time. The bleeding time is normal and FVIII:C levels are clearly lower than VWF:Ag in type 2N VWD. High resolution multimeric analysis of VWF in plasma demonstrates that proteolysis of VWF is increased in type 2A and 2B VWD with increased triplet structure of each visuable band (not present in types 2M and 2U), and that proteolysis of VWF is minimal in type 2C, 2D, and 2E variants that show aberrant multimeric structure of individual oligomers. VWD 2B differs from 2A by normal VWF in platelets, and increased ristocetine-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA). RIPA, which very likely reflects the VWF content of platelets, is normal in mild, decreased in moderate, and absent in severe type 2A VWD. RIPA is decreased or absent in 2M, 2U, 2C, and 2D, variable in 2E, and normal in 2N. VWD 2M is usually mild and characterized by decreased VWF:RCo and RIPA, a normal or near normal VWF multimeric pattern in a low resolution agarose gel. VWD 2A-like or unclassifiable (2U) is distinct from 2A and 2B and typically featured by low VWF:RCo and RIPA with the relative lack of high large VWF multimers. VWD type 2C is recessive and shows a characteristic multimeric pattern with a lack of high molecular weight multimers, the presence of one single-banded multimers instead of triplets caused by homozygosity or double hereozygosity for a mutation in the multimerization part of VWF gene. Autosomal dominant type 2D is rare and characterized by the lack of high molecular weight multimers and the presence of a characteristic intervening subband between individual oligimers due to mutation in the dimerization part of the VWF gene. In VWD type 2E, the large VWF multimers are missing and the pattern of the individual multimers shows only one clearly identifiable band, and there is no intervening band and no marked increase in the smallest oligomer. 2E appears to be less well defined, is usually autosomal dominant, and accounts for about one third of patients with 2A in a large cohort of VWD patients.     

Acquired von Willebrand disease--hemostatic management of major orthopedic surgery with high-dose immunoglobulin, desmopressin, and continuous factor concentrate infusion

Acquired von Willebrand disease (aVWD) is a rare bleeding disorder that mimics congenital VWD in previously healthy individuals; it is most frequently associated with monoclonal gammopathy. Hemostatic therapy of aVWD is challenging due to the extremely shortened half-life of endogenous and exogenous VWF. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (ivIG) is recommended as the treatment of choice, usually rapidly normalizing coagulation; but in case of failure, alternative treatment options are not well explored. We report successful major orthopedic surgery in a 61-year-old woman with multiple myeloma IgG lambda and aVWD. IvIG alone failed to correct hemostasis. However, ivIG pretreatment improved the VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) half-life from only 1.5 hr to more than 4 hr, allowing desmopressin infusions twice daily to maintain sufficient VWF:RCo levels. Because of diminishing desmopressin effect, we attempted for the first time in aVWD a continuous VWF/FVIII infusion (Haemate HS), 2.1-2.7 FVIII U/kg/hr or 51-64 U/kg/day, respectively 4.6-6.0 VWF:RCo U/kg/hr or 110-145 U/kg/day) to reach constant factor levels. The steady-state clearance was 2.4 mL/kg/hr for FVIII:C and 13.5 mL/kg/hr for VWF:RCo. During surgery, VWF:RCo, FVIII:C, and PFA-100 closure time were normalized. Until day 5, VWF:RCo was kept above 50%, from day 6 to 10 at least 30% activity were attained. FVIII:C levels were always >70%. The clinical course was uneventful without bleeding. Two weeks after hip surgery the patient was discharged from the hospital without complaints. The therapy described can be recommended as safe and feasible for further evaluation in aVWD patients who are hyporesponsive to ivIG treatment alone. Continuous VWF/FVIII infusion can improve substitution therapy in aVWD.     

Laboratory diagnostic approach of the parents-children relationship in differentiating low-level von Willebrand factor from mild type 1 von Willebrand disease

The present study aimed to evaluate the parent-child relationship in differentiating between unaffected healthy individuals and those with von Willebrand disease (VWD). This study was performed on 15 children between the ages of 5 and 15 years and parents with personal and familial evidence of bleeding. Diagnosis of VWD as considered 'low von Willebrand factor (VWF) level or mild type 1 VWD' in the following children: those with low VWF levels (VWF:RCo and VWF:Ag between 30 and 50 U/dl), at least one bleeding symptom and a family member with at least one bleeding symptom. Laboratory values in the parents of families 1-7 were VWF:Ag 65-90, VWF:RCo 54-87, and FVIII:C 74-110, versus VWF:Ag 33-47, VWF:RCo 30-42, and FVIII:C 36-67 in their children. The normal laboratory values in the parents of families 1-7 suggested that their children would probably have low VWF levels. Our findings are that VWF levels are increasing with age. Laboratory values in the parents of families 8-15 were VWF:Ag 30-59, VWF:RCo 32-55, and FVIII:C 44-66, versus VWF:Ag 32-48, VWF:RCo 30-54, and FVIII:C 38-55 in their children. The laboratory values in the children from families 8-15 were close to the minimum range of normal or below normal, which suggested that it was possible that the parents and children in families 8-15 could be diagnosed as having mild type 1 VWD. The present study's findings show that comparison of the VWF levels in parents and their children may be helpful in differentiating children with low VWF levels and mild type 1 VWD from children that only have low VWF levels.