Anti-plaque agents in the prevention of biofilm-associated oral diseases

The prevention of dental caries and periodontal diseases is targeted at the control of dental plaque. In this context, chemical agents could represent a valuable complement to mechanical plaque control. The active agents should prevent biofilm formation without affecting the biological equilibrium within the oral cavity. Depending on the goals of the preventive measures, various strategies may be considered. Anti-plaque agents with properties other than bactericidal or bacteriostatic activities may be used in primary prevention. In this approach, a modest anti-plaque effect may be sufficient or even desirable, as it would decrease the side effects of the active agent. Antimicrobial agents are best indicated in secondary and tertiary prevention, as the objectives are to restore health and to prevent disease recurrence. The rational is to prevent or delay subgingival recolonization by pathogenic micro-organisms. The development of in vitro oral biofilm models certainly represents a major advance for studying and testing oral anti-plaque agents in recent years. The results of these studies have shown that chlorhexidine, hexetidine, delmopinol, amine fluoride/stannous fluoride, triclosan, phenolic compounds, among others, may inhibit biofilm development and maturation as well as affect bacterial metabolism.     

Efficacy of Listerine®, Meridol® and chlorhexidine mouthrinses as supplements to regular tooth-cleaning measures

The anti-plaque, anti-gingivitis and anti-microbial efficacies of a phenolic compound (Listerine) and 2 different amine/stannous fluoride mouthwashes (Meridol I, II) were compared when these solutions were used in addition to usual tooth cleaning. A placebo preparation was utilized as a negative control and a chlorhexidine solution as a positive control in this double-blind study. After professional tooth cleaning, 49 volunteers continued their habitual, self-performed and non-supervised oral hygiene for a period of 2 weeks, in order to have a more standard baseline. At day 0, they began to rinse twice daily with 1 of the 5 mouthwashes. After 3 weeks of rinsing, plaque indices remained the lowest in the chlorhexidine and the Meridol I groups, while subjects using Listerine or Meridol II demonstrated similar indices significantly lower than that of individuals rinsing with the placebo solution. Through this period, the gingival index scores were similar in the Meridol, Listerine and chlorhexidine groups. At day 21, the mean GI scores in the chlorhexidine group were significantly lower than the scores in the placebo group. The plaque vitality scores showed a bacterial effect in vivo of chlorhexidine and, to a lesser extent, of the Meridol solutions. No substantial evidence of an antibacterial effect in vivo was found for Listerine. This study has demonstrated that when mouthrinses are used to supplement habitual mechanical oral hygiene, chlorhexidine remains the most powerful solution. Furthermore, it was also shown that a combination of habitual self-performed and non-supervised oral hygiene with Meridol or Listerine is more beneficial for plaque control than the use of mechanical oral hygiene alone.     

Chewing sticks: timeless natural toothbrushes for oral cleansing

It is generally accepted that oral hygiene maintenance through regular removal of dental plaque and food deposits is an essential factor in the prevention of dental caries and periodontal disease. Methods for oral hygiene vary from country to country and from culture to culture. Despite the widespread use of toothbrushes and toothpastes, natural methods of tooth cleaning using chewing sticks selected and prepared from the twigs, stems or roots from a variety of plant species have been practised for thousands of years in Asia, Africa, the Middle East and the Americas. Selected clinical studies have shown that chewing sticks, when properly used, can be as efficient as toothbrushes in removing dental plaque due to the combined effect of mechanical cleaning and enhanced salivation. It has also been suggested that antimicrobial substances that naturally protect plants against various invading microorganisms or other parasites may leach out into the oral cavity, and that these compounds may benefit the users by protection against cariogenic and periodontopathic bacteria. Some clinical epidemiological studies are in support of this, and many laboratory investigations have suggested the presence of heterogeneous antimicrobial components extractable using different chemical procedures. A few recent studies have identified some of the active antimicrobial compounds. Today, chewing sticks are still used in many developing countries because of religion and or tradition, and because of their availability, low cost and simplicity. The World Health Organization also encourages their use. The Year 2000 Consensus Report on Oral Hygiene states that chewing sticks may have a role to play in the promotion of oral hygiene, and that evaluation of their effectiveness warrants further research.     

Treatment of aggressive periodontitis

Despite etiological differences between aggressive and chronic periodontitis, the treatment concept for aggressive periodontitis is largely similar to that for chronic periodontitis. The goal of treatment is to create a clinical condition that is conducive to retaining as many teeth as possible for as long as possible. When a diagnosis has been made and risk factors have been identified, active treatment is commenced. The initial phase of active treatment consists of mechanical debridement, either alone or supplemented with antimicrobial drugs. Scaling and root planing has been shown to be effective in improving clinical indices, but does not always guarantee long‐term stability. Antimicrobials can play a significant role in controlling aggressive periodontitis. Few studies have been published on this subject for localized aggressive periodontitis, but generalized aggressive periodontitis has been subject to more scrutiny. Studies have demonstrated that systemic antibiotics as an adjuvant to scaling and root planing are more effective in controlling disease compared with scaling and root planing alone or with supplemental application of local antibiotics or antiseptics. It has also become apparent that antibiotics ought to be administered with, or just after, mechanical debridement. Several studies have shown that regimens of amoxicillin combined with metronidazole or regimens of clindamycin are the most effective and are preferable to regimens containing doxycycline. Azithromycin has been shown to be a valid alternative to the regimen of amoxicillin plus metronidazole. A limited number of studies have been published on surgical treatment in patients with aggressive periodontitis, but the studies available show that the effect can be comparable with the effect on patients with chronic periodontitis, provided that proper oral hygiene is maintained, a strict maintenance program is followed and modifiable risk factors are controlled. Both access surgery and regenerative techniques have shown good results in patients with aggressive periodontitis. Once good periodontal health has been obtained, patients must be enrolled in a strict maintenance program that is directed toward controlling risk factors for disease recurrence and tooth loss. The most significant risk factors are noncompliance with regular maintenance care, smoking, high gingival bleeding index and poor plaque control. There is no evidence to suggest that daily use of antiseptic agents should be part of the supportive periodontal therapy for aggressive periodontitis.     

Contemporary practices for mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal disease

It is well established that dental plaque on teeth leads to gingivitis and periodontitis, and that several mechanical and chemical methods of plaque control can prevent gingivitis. The aim of the current review is to summarize and synthesize the available scientific evidence supporting practices for mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal diseases. Evidence for contemporary practices of mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal disease relies on studies of gingivitis patients. General recommendations concerning the ideal oral hygiene devices and procedures are still inconclusive. However, toothbrushing and interdental cleaning remain the mainstays of prevention of periodontal diseases. The primary approach requires individually tailored instruction for implementation of a systematic oral hygiene regimen.     

Prevention of plaque growth with chewing gum containing chlorhexidine acetate

The purpose of the study was to assess the anti-plaque effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) in chewing gum. The 0.80 g pieces of test gum contained 5 mg chlorhexidine acetate with or without a hydrogen peroxide releasing agent. The gum base with flavouring agents but containing neither CHX nor H2O2 was used as a control. 12 dental hygiene students volunteered to participate in the 3 x crossed-over double blind clinical trial. During the 4-day test periods, no other oral hygiene measures were allowed than chewing 2 pieces of gum at the time for approximately 10 min, 5 times daily. Between test periods, meticulous mechanical oral hygiene measures were practised for 3 days. At the beginning and at the end of each test period, the quantity of plaque was assessed using the plaque index, plaque wet weight, and the area of plaque on the tooth surface as criteria. The results indicated that both CHX gums completely inhibited the increase in plaque index and plaque weight. With regard to area of plaque, the difference between the 2 test gums and the control gum was less marked but still present. The test persons subjectively assessed the gum base to have a poor cleansing effect but also the least unpleasant taste. It was concluded that use of both the chlorhexidine gum and the gum-containing chlorhexidine in addition to the hydrogen peroxide releasing agent had an excellent plaque growth inhibiting effect during the 4-day test periods.     

Non-surgical periodontal therapy with adjunctive chlorhexidine use in adults with down syndrome: a prospective case series

BACKGROUND: Subjects with Down syndrome (DS) experience a high prevalence of periodontal disease, and the management of this disease in subjects with DS is a challenge for oral health care providers. The purpose of this case series was to follow the periodontal healing response changes over a 12-month period after non-surgical mechanical periodontal therapy with the adjunctive use of chlorhexidine and monthly recalls in adults with DS who presented initially with chronic periodontitis. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects with DS (14 males and seven females; 25.3 +/- 5.5 years of age) with reported mild-to-moderate learning disabilities and chronic periodontitis were recruited and treated by non-surgical mechanical periodontal therapy (followed by monthly recalls) and the adjunctive use of chlorhexidine gel for toothbrushing and chlorhexidine mouthwash twice daily. Clinical data were recorded. RESULTS: After 12 months of non-surgical mechanical periodontal therapy, the mean percentage of sites with plaque decreased from 84.1% to 23.6%, and the mean number of sites with bleeding on probing decreased from 82.1% to 29.5%. Mean probing depth decreased from 3.2 to 1.8 mm, with a mean clinical attachment level gain of 0.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory healing responses were achieved following non-surgical mechanical periodontal therapy with the adjunctive use of chlorhexidine and monthly recalls in adults with DS with chronic periodontitis and mild-to-moderate learning disabilities. Such a treatment regimen seems appropriate and beneficial for adults with DS and chronic periodontitis.     

Chemotherapy. A viable periodontal treatment modality?

Because bacterial plaque is composed chiefly of micro-organisms, use of chemotherapeutic agents directed against a susceptible flora would seem a conceptually valid therapeutic modality, in terms of inhibition of plaque, for the prevention and treatment of periodontal disease. The objective of treatment largely dictates the modality used. If, for example, the philosophy of treatment is elimination or reduction of pocket depth, chemotherapy against supragingival plaque may complement mechanical oral hygiene in the absence of a plaque-free environment. On the other hand, access to the subgingival flora can only be achieved through systemic administration of drugs or the use of controlled delivery systems. Notwithstanding their potential benefit as adjunctive therapy, in cases of refractory periodontitis and juvenile periodontitis in which elimination of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans by mechanical debridement alone is extremely difficult, the potential for adverse reactions from the administration of antibiotics must be weighed and their use, in general, considered unwarranted. The dynamics of the inter-relationship between supragingival and subgingival plaque necessitates control of both for the successful treatment of periodontal disease. Although there are chemical agents that have been shown to be effective in the treatment of gingivitis, the evidence pertaining to their effectiveness in the treatment of periodontitis, either alone or in conjunction with conventional therapy, is inconclusive. If specific microbial floras are associated with different forms of periodontal disease, chemotherapeutic agents to which such micro-organisms are susceptible would have to be employed for their elimination. Until accurate predictors of disease activity--including definitive indicators of which particular sites are, at any one time, actively undergoing attachment loss--are available, the use of chemotherapeutic agents directed at the subgingival flora appears extremely limited and impractical. However, with the development of predictors of disease activity, including sophisticated methods of determining even small increments of attachment loss, new drugs, and a better understanding of subgingival ecologic systems, chemotherapy may yet play a significant role in the treatment of periodontal disease.     

Use of antimicrobial agents during supportive periodontal therapy

Individual susceptibility to periodontal breakdown involves an interplay of genes, periodontal pathogens and other modulating factors. Anti-infective treatment, which includes oral hygiene measures, mechanical debridement, pharmacologic intervention and surgery, has been shown to be effective in arresting the progression of periodontal disease. Nevertheless, due to the chronic nature of the disease, susceptible individuals who are not maintained in a supervised recall program subsequent to the active treatment phase, show signs of recurrent destruction. Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) is an integral part of periodontal treatment for patients with history of periodontitis, and is needed to prevent recurrence of disease in susceptible individuals. To prevent re-infection with periodontal pathogens, SPT includes elimination of dental plaque and bacteria from the oral cavity, thereby preventing the recurrence of pathogens into the gingival area. For individuals at risk of developing periodontitis, SPT should combine self-performed and professional anti-infective therapy, using mechanical and pharmacological means. The existing evidence suggests that the adjunctive use of antimicrobial pharmacologic therapy during SPT may enhance the results of mechanical debridement. The use of antimicrobials varies between patients, and is dependent on risk assessment and longitudinal monitoring of the clinical status of the periodontium.     

The levels of volatile sulfur compounds in mouth air from patients with chronic periodontitis

Background and Objective: Volatile sulfur compounds may be the main source of oral malodor. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between periodontal parameters and volatile sulfur compounds and to evaluate the improvement of several halitosis‐related outcomes by tongue scraping, nonsurgical periodontal treatment (including oral hygiene instruction) and oral hygiene instruction/chlorhexidine + cetyl pyridinium gargling. Material and Methods: Seventy‐two chronic periodontitis patients with heavy tongue coating were assessed for oral malodor and periodontal status. Oral malodor was evaluated by measuring the levels of volatile sulfur compounds using OralChroma? and the organoleptic test score. Thirty participants were selected for the subsequent experiments: tongue scraping; nonsurgical periodontal treatment; and oral hygiene instruction/chlorhexidine + cetyl pyridinium gargling. Twenty‐five participants completed all experimental stages. Results: Significant correlations were observed between the organoleptic test score and hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), methyl mercapton (CH₃SH), tongue coating score and volatile sulfur compounds, which was also significantly correlated with bleeding on probing percentage and tongue coating score. Tongue scraping significantly reduced the levels of volatile sulfur compounds. Further reduction of volatile sulfur compounds after nonsurgical periodontal treatment and oral hygiene instruction/chlorhexidine + cetyl pyridinium gargling were noted compared with baseline. Conclusion: Volatile sulfur compounds, with H₂S and CH₃SH as the main components, in mouth air are the prominent elements of malodor. Volatile sulfur compounds were decreased by more than 50% after tongue scraping. Nonsurgical periodontal treatment and oral hygiene instruction/chlorhexidine + cetyl pyridinium gargling maintained a significantly lower level of malodor compared with baseline.     

The effect of various plaque control measures on gingivitis and caries in schoolchildren

The aims of the present study were (1) to analyze the separate effects on plaque, caries, and gingivitis of several measures (oral hygiene instruction, professional tooth cleaning with mechanical instruments, topical application of sodium monofluorophosphate - MFP) which have been incorporated in a prophylactic treatment program, described by AXELSSON & LINDHE1, and (2) to prevent caries and gingivitis by applying the combined treatment but replacing the professional mechanical tooth cleaning with chemical cleaning using a chlorhexidine-containing gel. 164 children, 13-14 years old, divided into four groups, participated in a 2-year trial. All participants were recalled once every 2nd week for preventive treatment provided by dental nurses. During the 1st year Group 3 and 4 received prophylactic treatment identical to that described by AXELSSON & LINDHE1. During the 2nd year the professional tooth cleaning was omitted but oral hygiene instruction was given every 2nd week. During the 1st year Groups 1 and 2 were treated with 0.5% chlorhexidine but during the 2nd year they were subjected to professional tooth cleaning with mechanical instruments. Throughout the trial Groups 1 and 3 rinsed once every 2nd week with a 2% MFP solution. The results showed that by oral hygiene instruction and frequently repeated professional tooth cleanings it was possible to substantially reduce the frequency of gingivitis and prevent caries. When this treatment was used, mouthrinsings with 2% MFP had no additional effect on caries. The substitution of the mechanical cleaning procedure with topical application of a 0.5% chlorhexidine gel failed to (1) remove supragingival plaque accumulations, (2) reduce the frequency of gingivitis, and (3) retard the rate of caries development. The data also revealed that interdental cleaning with mechanical instruments was of decisive importance in the prevention of approximal surface caries.     

The effect of a chlorhexidine regimen on de novo plaque formation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a pretreatment regimen that combined meticulous mechanical tooth cleaning with the daily use of chlorhexidine (rinse, gargle and tongue application) on de novo plaque formation and on the recolonization of various microbiological species in plaque and saliva during a 4-day period of no oral hygiene. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten subjects aged 24-36 years with gingivitis were recruited. The study was designed as a double blind cross-over clinical trial including two phases. Each experimental phase comprised one preparatory period of 7 days and one plaque accumulation period of 4 days. During the preparatory period, the volunteers (i) performed meticulous mechanical tooth cleaning using toothbrush and dentifrice and (ii) were, in addition, given two sessions of professional tooth cleaning (PTC) The final PTC was delivered after bacterial sampling had been made on Day 0. In the Control group, no additional plaque control measures were included. In the Test group, the participants in addition to the mechanical measures (i) rinsed twice daily, for 60 s each time with a 0.2% chlorhexidine solution, (ii) gargled twice daily for 10 s with the chlorhexidine preparation, and finally (iii) brushed the dorsum of the tongue for 60 s, twice daily, with a 1.0% chlorhexidine gel. During the 4-day plaque accumulation period, the participants abstained from all mechanical and chemical plaque control measures. On Days 0, 1, 2 and 4 the quantity and quality of plaque formed was assessed by clinical means and by DNA probe techniques. The microbiota of the saliva was studied in samples obtained on Days 0 and 4. RESULTS: It was demonstrated that chlorhexidine used as a mouthrinse combined with gargling and tongue application during the preparatory period significantly retarded the amount of plaque that formed on tooth surfaces during the following 4 days of no oral hygiene. Further, the number of microorganisms present in the biofilm representing Days 0, 1 and 2 of the "plaque accumulation period" was apparently affected by the use of the antiseptic. Among the microorganisms influenced by the chlorhexidine regimen, a substantial number belonged to the genus Actinomyces. It was also observed that the adjunctive use of chlorhexidine reduced the number of bacteria present in saliva at the end of the preparatory period (i.e. on Day 0). After 4 days of no oral hygiene, the microbiota of the newly formed plaque in the Test and Control groups had many features in common. CONCLUSION: Habitat is critical in controlling the bacterial composition of the dental biofilm. The microbiota will tend to go back to the one that is characteristic of a given subject, once chemical antimicrobial means are withdrawn.     

Six-month study of the effects of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on gingivitis in adults

The effects of a chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse on plaque and gingivitis were studied among 430 adults in a six-month clinical trial. Subjects were divided in two comparable treatment groups matched for age, sex, and initial gingivitis severity. Following a thorough oral prophylaxis, they were instructed to rinse twice a day for 30 seconds with 15 ml of a 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse or a placebo mouthrinse. After three and six months of mouthrinse use, the chlorhexidine group had significantly less gingivitis, gingival bleeding, and plaque accumulation compared to the placebo group. As expected, accumulation of dental calculus and extrinsic dental stain increased in the chlorbexidine group. No significant differences in adverse oral soft tissue effects were observed between the two groups.
Since use of oral antimicrobial agents has been reported to produce tooth and tongue stain, gingivitis examinations were done with and without tooth covers to eliminate the potential for examiner bias. Comparable reductions in the Gingival Index scores and gingival bleeding were obtained when the evaluations were conducted with or without the tooth covers.
It was concluded that a 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse can provide an important adjunct to the prevention and control of gingivitis when used with regular personal oral hygiene procedures and professional care.     

The use of 0.2% chlorhexidine in the absence of a structured mechanical regimen of oral hygiene following the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis

Abstract. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinse following the non-surgical treatment of advanced human periodontitis in the absence of a structured mechanical oral hygiene regimen. 10 patients and a total of 1483 sites were used. Recordings for plaque, bleeding, pocket depth and attachment levels were made at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Debridement was performed under local anaesthesia. No instruction or reinforcement in mechanical ocal hygiene procedures was given at any time. However, at each visit the patients were instructed in the 2× daily use of 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash. The plaque indices, scored as % of sites with removable deposits, showed negligible improvement from baseline scores of 80%-100% for all categories of initial probing depth. Mean bleeding score was reduced to 10–20% irrespective of initial probing pocket depth, site location or tooth surface location. Sites ≥7 mm at baseline demonstrated a reduction in mean probing pocket depth of 3.9 mm and a gain in mean probing attachment level of 2.5 mm. Moderately deep sites (4–6.5 mm) demonstrated a reduction in mean probing pocket depth of 2 mm and a gain in mean probing attachment level of 0.8 mm. Shallow sites (≤3.5 mm) demonstrated a reduction in mean probing pocket depth of 0.5 mm and a loss in mean probing attachment level of 0.2 mm. Site-specific attachment level analysis demonstrated that over 80% of losing sites were shallow with low bleeding frequency, indicating that the loss of attachment may have occurred for reasons other than inflammatory periodontal disease. The results indicate that chlorhexidine can be used as an adjunct to inadequate mechanical oral hygiene over an observation period of 1 year.     

The place of chemical products in oral hygiene for the prevention and treatment of periodontal disease]

The mechanical elimination of the bacteria plaque is the basis of the prevention and the treatment of gingivitis and periodontitis. Chemicals products used in the control of supra and subgingival plaque show a great importance because of individual and professional difficulties which constitute an impediment to the effective elimination of the bacteria plaque. However, by this time, there's no miracle product for oral hygiene capable at long term to take over from the tooth-brush and paste. The use at long term of chemicals in the bacteria plaque control can't be recommended because of their following effects and their slight effectivity-cost ratio. Nevertheless, oral hygiene chemicals combined with mechanical treatment provide very good results. Particularly, when used in the form of subgingival irrigation or slow liberation materials set in the periodontal pocket.     

Effect of 4 days of mouth rinsing with delmopinol or chlorhexidine on the vitality of plaque bacteria

Delmopinol is a new surface active anti-plaque agent that has demonstrated a low antimicrobial effect in vitro. By use of a vitality staining technique, the antimicrobial effect on bacteria in plaque samples was tested after rinsing with delmopinol or chlorhexidine. 6 healthy male subjects volunteered to rinse for 4 days using a double-blind cross-over study design with a wash-out period between the rinsing regimens. No oral hygiene measures were allowed during the test periods and each test period started with a professional tooth cleaning procedure 2 days before the start of rinsing to allow for plaque formation. Rinsing was performed with 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride or 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate 2 x a day. Small samples of plaque were collected from the buccal surfaces of premolars and 1st molars before the first rinse on day 1 and then before and 1, 2, 4, 7, and 24 h after the last rinse on the 4th day. The plaque samples were immediately stained with propidium iodide and fluorescein diacetate to visualize dead and vital microorganisms respectively. The vitality of the microflora was evaluated using a fluorescence microscope. The baseline vitality values were 91% for chlorhexidine and 86% for delmopinol. At day 4, the plaque vitality for chlorhexidine was approximately 40% up to 4 h and 50% at 7 h and 60% at 24 h after the last rinse. Corresponding values for plaque vitality after delmopinol rinsing were between 70 and 80% on all sampling occasions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effects of a 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse on plaque, toothstaining and candida in aphthous ulcer patients

Despite the known effectiveness of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in preventing plaque formation, relatively few studies have assessed adjunctive benefit to normal unsupervised oral hygiene measures. Furthermore, there have been few accurate measurements of toothstaining in the presence of normal oral hygiene and little data of effects on oral candidal carriage. This study was a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study of a 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash used 3 times daily on plaque, staining and candidal carriage in a group of recurrent aphthous ulcer suffers who maintained normal oral hygiene measures. At the end of 2 6-week treatment periods, baseline plaque scores were reduced by active and placebo mouthwashes. Chlorhexidine significantly reduced plaque compared to the placebo. Staining has markedly and significantly increased during chlorhexidine rinsing. Candidal carriage was present in 22.2% of this group and there was no significant effect of chlorhexidine on the mean number of candidal colonies. The distribution of plaque and staining by tooth was plotted and observationally studied. Baseline and placebo treatment plaque distributions indicated the considerable relevance of toothbrushing behaviour for plaque distribution. The effects of toothbrushing on plaque distribution were minimised during the use of chlorhexidine. Staining associated with chlorhexidine showed a distribution again suggesting the influence of toothbrushing. In conclusion, chlorhexidine has significant adjunctive effects on plaque inhibition in the presence of normal unsupervised oral hygiene, but toothbrushing did not prevent toothstaining.     

Primer for antimicrobial periodontal therapy

Successful prevention and treatment of periodontitis is contingent upon effective control of the periodontopathic microbiota. Periodontal pathogens reside in subgingival sites but also colonize supragingival plaque, tongue dorsum and other oral sites. Controlling destructive periodontal disease warrants a comprehensive antimicrobial approach that targets periodontal pathogens in various ecological niches of the oral cavity. Also, to effectively combat periodontal pathogens, the various elements of antimicrobial periodontal therapy should be engaged within a short period of time. Scaling and root planing, with or without periodontal surgery, along with proper oral hygiene, constitute the primary approach to controlling periodontopathogens. Antimicrobial agents administered systemically or locally can help suppress periodontal pathogens in periodontal sites and in the entire mouth. Microbiological testing aids the clinician in selecting the most effective antimicrobial agent or combination of agents, and in monitoring the effectiveness of periodontal treatment. The present paper considers theoretical and practical aspects of effective antimicrobial treatment of destructive periodontal disease.     

Antimicrobial approaches to periodontal therapy

The relationship between the periodontal microbiota and the threshold for periodontal disease is dependent on the specific bacterial composition of the plaque and the resistance of the host. Supragingival plaque is the cause of gingivitis and plays a primary role in the initiation of periodontitis. The 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash (twice a day) is safe and most effective antiplaque and anti-gingivitis agent. The use of adjunctive tetracycline for 2 week periods (1 gm daily) with root debridement is highly effective against Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and many of suspected virulence microorganisms, the major etiological agents of juvenile periodontitis. For rapidly progressive periodontitis and refractory adult periodontitis, metronidazole for 1-2 week periods (600 mg.daily) has excellent activity against strictly anaerobic bacteria such as Bacteroides gingivalis, Spirochetes and others. Clinical use of antimicrobial agent in adjuvant with scaling, root planing, and personal oral hygiene instruction cause a significant improvement of the periodontium.