Otlertuzumab (TRU‐016), an anti‐CD37 monospecific ADAPTIR™ therapeutic protein,for relapsed or refractory NHL patients

CD37 is cell surface tetraspanin present on normal and malignant B cells. Otlertuzumab (TRU‐016) is a novel humanized anti‐CD37 protein therapeutic. Patients with relapsed or refractory follicular non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), or Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia (WM) received otlertuzumab at 20 mg/kg administered intravenously once a week for up to 8 weeks followed by 4 monthly doses. Sixteen patients were treated; median age was 62·5 years (range, 41–81), and median number of prior regimens was 4 (range, 1–7). Twelve patients were refractory to prior treatment, 5 were refractory to rituximab. The mean terminal half‐life was 9·5 days. Lymph node reduction of ≥50% by computerized tomography scan measurements was seen in 3 of 12 patients, including one FL patient who had a partial response. One WM patient had a minor response. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, thrombocytopenia, diarrhoea, and peripheral oedema; most were grade 1/2. Otlertuzumab treatment appears to have been well tolerated by the patients in this study. Clinical activity was observed in this small heterogeneous cohort of highly refractory, heavily pretreated B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma patients. These data suggest that further clinical investigation in non‐Hodgkin lymphoma is warranted.     

The cost‐effectiveness of immediate treatment or watch and wait with deferred chemotherapy for advanced asymptomatic follicular lymphoma

Recent evidence has shown that immediate treatment with rituximab induction, with and without maintenance, substantially reduces the need for further treatment in patients with advanced asymptomatic follicular lymphoma. This analysis estimates the cost‐effectiveness of immediate treatment approaches in comparison to a watch and wait approach from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. A Markov decision model was developed to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of treatment strategies in patients with asymptomatic follicular lymphoma. The model was populated using effectiveness data from a systematic literature review with the key clinical data sourced from a randomised trial, in which the treatment strategies were compared. Costs were estimated using UK national sources. In comparison to watchful waiting, both rituximab strategies were found to be more effective and cost saving. In comparison to rituximab induction, the addition of rituximab maintenance marginally increased effectiveness but substantially increased costs, resulting in an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £69 406 per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY). In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, rituximab induction was found to have a 68% probability of being cost‐effective at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY. In conclusion, active treatment with rituximab induction is a cost‐effective strategy to adopt in patients with asymptomatic follicular lymphoma.     

Rituximab combined with DexaBEAM followed by high dose therapy as salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell lymphoma: mature results of a phase II multicentre study

Salvage therapy followed by high‐dose therapy (HDT) remains a mainstay for patients with relapsed lymphoma, however no optimal regimen has been defined. Here we report on the results of R‐DexaBEAM (rituximab, dexamethasone, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) followed by HDT. Patients aged 18–65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score 0–2, with relapsed/refractory B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were eligible. R‐Dexa‐BEAM was given for two cycles followed by stem cell mobilization and HDT. Primary endpoint of the trial was progression‐free‐survival (PFS). One hundred and three patients were included: aggressive NHL (aNHL): diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma 55, mantle cell lymphoma 7, follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3: 5, indolent Lymphoma (iNHL): FL grade 1–2: 29, marginal zone lymphoma 6, Immunocytoma 1. The overall response rate after salvage therapy was 62% for aNHL and 78% for iNHL patients. 66% of patients with aNHL and 86% with iNHL underwent HDT. Treatment‐related mortality for HDT was 1·3%. For aNHL patients, the median PFS was 0·83 years with 44% alive at the median follow‐up of 7·3 years. Corresponding figures for iNHL were: median PFS 3·7 years and 72% alive after 8 years. The combination of rituximab with DexaBEAM followed by HDT resulted in high response rates and sustained remissions in responders. R‐DexaBEAM followed by HDT can be considered a valid salvage option for NHL.     

Phase II study of bortezomib in combination with rituximab,cyclophosphamide and prednisone with or without doxorubicin followed by rituximab maintenance in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

This non‐comparative phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00715208) evaluated bortezomib in place of vincristine in established rituximab‐chemotherapy regimens in relapsed/refractory follicular (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Patients were allocated (physician/patient preference) to receive six 21‐d cycles of: bortezomib 1·6 mg/m² (days 1, 8), rituximab 375 mg/m² (day 1), cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m² (day 1) and prednisone 100 mg (days 1–5; VR‐CP; 47 FL, 1 MZL patients); or bortezomib, rituximab, prednisone per VR‐CP, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² and doxorubicin 50 mg/m² (day 1; VR‐CAP; 4 FL, 2 MZL, 1 chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients). With VR‐CP, the response rate was 77%, with a 27% complete response rate. After a median follow‐up of 10·9 months, 40% of patients had relapsed/progressed or died. Median duration of response and progression‐free survival was 21·9 and 14·9 months, respectively. Common drug‐related grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (6%) and lymphopenia (6%). Thirteen (27%) patients reported peripheral neuropathy (one grade 3). With VR‐CAP, one FL patient achieved complete response and three FL and two MZL patients achieved partial responses. Three patients reported drug‐related grade 1/2 peripheral neuropathy. Weekly bortezomib and rituximab represents an active, feasible treatment platform in FL. VR‐CP was active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory FL.     

Impact of prior rituximab on outcomes of autologous stem‐cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell lymphoma: a multicentre retrospective Spanish group of lymphoma/autologous bone marrow transplant study

The use of highly effective rituximab‐containing therapy for treating diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) makes it more difficult to salvage relapsed or refractory patients. Autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT) is the reference treatment for these patients, but the impact of previous exposure to rituximab on the subsequent results of ASCT remains unknown. We analysed 248 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL or grade 3B follicular lymphoma pre‐treated with rituximab as part of first‐line therapy (R+ group) who received ASCT, in comparison with a control group of 127 patients without previous exposure to rituximab (R? group). The complete remission (CR) rates were similar in both groups. Multivariate analysis identified age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index at diagnosis, extranodal involvement and disease status at transplant, and the number of previous chemotherapy lines as independent factors with a negative influence on CR rate. Compared with R? patients, those in the R+ group had a significantly better progression‐free survival (63% vs. 48% at 5 years) and overall survival (72% vs. 61% at 5 years). This observation was independent of other prognostic factors that affected these outcomes. In conclusion, ASCT is no less effective in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell lymphoma pre‐treated with first‐line rituximab‐containing therapy than in rituximab‐naive patients.     

Lenalidomide plus rituximab can produce durable clinical responses in patients with relapsed or refractory,indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

This phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory, indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Patients were treated with daily lenalidomide in 28‐d cycles and weekly rituximab for 4 weeks. Lenalidomide was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Twenty‐two patients were assessed for FCGR3A polymorphisms. Thirty patients were enrolled; 27 were evaluable for response. The overall response rate (ORR) was 74% including 44% complete responses (CR); median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 12·4 months. The 13 rituximab refractory patients had an ORR of 61·5% (four CR/unconfirmed CR). The ORR was 77% in the 22 follicular lymphoma patients (nine CR/unconfirmed CR). At a median follow‐up time of 43 months, the median duration of response and time to next therapy were 15·4 and 37·4 months, respectively. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were lymphopenia (45%), neutropenia (55%), fatigue (23%) and hyponatraemia (9%). The ORR and PFS in patients with low‐affinity FCGR3A polymorphisms (F/F and F/V) suggest that lenalidomide may improve the activity of rituximab in these patients. These data suggest that combining lenalidomide with rituximab can produce durable responses with acceptable toxicity in patients with indolent NHL.     

Phase Ib trial of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor voxtalisib (SAR245409) in combination with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies

This phase Ib, dose‐escalation study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of the pan‐class I phosphoinositide 3‐kinase (PI3K) and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor voxtalisib [30 or 50 mg twice daily (BID)], in combination with rituximab (voxtalisib+rituximab) or rituximab plus bendamustine (voxtalisib+rituximab+bendamustine), in relapsed or refractory indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). MTD and RP2D of voxtalisib were determined using a 3 + 3 dose‐escalation design. Adverse events (AEs), plasma PK and disease response were recorded. Thirty‐seven patients were enrolled. The RP2D of voxtalisib in combination with rituximab or rituximab+bendamustine was 50 mg BID. Four patients experienced a total of five dose‐limiting toxicities. The most frequent AEs were nausea (45·9%), fatigue (37·8%) headache (32·4%) and pyrexia (32·4%). The most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (27·0%), thrombocytopenia (24·3%), anaemia (16·2%) and febrile neutropenia (10·8%). Voxtalisib PK parameters were not affected by co‐administration with rituximab or rituximab+bendamustine. Of 35 efficacy‐evaluable patients, four (11·4%) achieved complete response and 13 (37·1%) achieved partial response. Voxtalisib, in combination with rituximab or rituximab+bendamustine, demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and encouraging anti‐tumour activity in relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies.     

A multicentre phase II study of vorinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma

Although initial rituximab‐containing chemotherapies achieve high response rates, indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (B‐NHL), such as follicular lymphoma (FL), is still incurable. Therefore, new effective agents with novel mechanisms are anticipated. In this multicentre phase II study, patients with relapsed/refractory indolent B‐NHL and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) received vorinostat 200 mg twice daily for 14 consecutive days in a 21‐d cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in FL patients and safety and tolerability in all patients. Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS). Fifty‐six eligible patients were enrolled; 50 patients (39 with FL, seven with other B‐NHL, and four with MCL) were evaluable for ORR, and 40 patients had received rituximab‐containing prior chemotherapeutic regimens. For the 39 patients with FL, the ORR was 49% [95% confidence interval (CI): 32·4, 65·2] and the median PFS was 20 months (95% CI: 11·2, 29·7). Major toxicities were manageable grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Vorinostat offers sustained antitumour activity in patients with relapsed or refractory FL with an acceptable safety profile. Further investigation of vorinostat for clinical efficacy is warranted.     

Is rituximab sub‐optimally dosed in indolent B cell lymphoma?

Rituximab pharmacokinetics are affected by gender, age and weight and can affect outcomes in aggressive B cell lymphoma. Less is known about the pharmacokinetics of rituximab in indolent B cell lymphoma (iNHL). We analysed the effects of gender, age, weight and body surface area on the outcomes of 303 patients treated with first line rituximab‐based regimens for iNHL. The patients were divided into 3 treatment cohorts: rituximab only, rituximab + chemotherapy (R‐CTX) and R‐CTX followed by rituximab maintenance; furthermore, each cohort was subdivided as follicular (FL) or non‐FL, based on histology. Older males and patients with higher weight had worse outcomes when treated with R‐CTX, probably due to faster rituximab clearance. Our results concur with studies of R‐CTX for DLBCL. As this effect was not observed in patients treated with rituximab alone or R‐CTX followed by rituximab maintenance, we hypothesize that higher rituximab levels reached with weekly rituximab and/or prolonged exposure achieved with maintenance therapy exceed the therapeutic threshold, even with faster clearance, which nullifies the negative effect of higher weight and male gender. In conclusion, under current practices, a subset of patients with iNHL, i.e., FL treated with R‐CTX, may be sub‐optimally dosed with rituximab.     

Low incidence of pneumocystis pneumonia utilizing PCR‐based diagnosis in patients with B‐cell lymphoma receiving rituximab‐containing combination chemotherapy

Recent literature has demonstrated concern over the risk of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) when administering rituximab with combination chemotherapy such as in R‐CHOP; however, the exact risk and potential need for prophylaxis is unknown. We sought to determine the incidence of PJP infection following R‐CHOP administration in patients with B‐cell lymphoma. Consecutive patients diagnosed with B‐cell lymphoma receiving R‐CHOP were evaluated from chemotherapy initiation until 180 days after the last administration. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of PJP infection. Secondary endpoints included the association of rituximab, prednisone and subsequent chemotherapy with PJP infection risk. A total of 689 patients (53% male, median age 66 years) were included. Seventy‐three percent of patients completed at least 6 cycles of R‐CHOP treatment. Median rituximab and prednisone cumulative doses were 3950 mg and 5325 mg, respectively. Median daily prednisone dose through end of treatment was 45 mg (range 7.6 mg to 119 mg). The cumulative incidence of PJP was 1.51% (95% CI 0.57–2.43, at maximum follow‐up of 330 days), below 3.5%, the conventional threshold for prophylaxis. Univariate analysis did not detect a statistically significant association between PJP and rituximab, steroids, or receipt of additional chemotherapy in this patient population. Our results demonstrate a low occurrence of Pneumocystis pneumonia during R‐CHOP treatment of B‐cell lymphoma and argue against universal anti‐Pneumocystis prophylaxis in this setting. Further investigations should focus on targeted anti‐Pneumocystis prophylaxis for patients presenting with high‐risk baseline characteristics or when receiving rituximab‐inclusive intensive combination chemotherapy regimens as treatment for other aggressive lymphoma subtypes. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1113–1117, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A phase I study of bendamustine,lenalidomide and rituximab in relapsed and refractory lymphomas

Many patients with non‐Hodgkin (NHL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) relapse or are refractory to initial therapy and require additional options. Bendamustine (B), lenalidomide (L) and rituximab (R) each have activity in this setting. This study was performed to determine the safety of BLR and its optimal phase II dose. Patients with NHL or HL failing standard therapies received B (90 mg/m² days 1, 2 every 28 days), and L (escalating from 5 mg 21/28 days) for six cycles, followed by 6 months of L. At the highest dose R 375 mg/m² on day one of each cycle was added for patients with B‐NHL. Histologies included diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 11), marginal zone lymphoma (3), HL (2), and one each of transformed follicular lymphoma, Sézary syndrome, Waldenström macroglobulinaemia and mantle cell lymphoma. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 and 4 toxicity, but no maximum tolerated dose was identified. Of 20 patients, seven responded (35%), including four complete remissions, with five unmaintained responses from 28+ to 37+ months, including 2 DLBCL. BR with 20 mg l at, 21/28 days achieved durable responses; however, in light of its modest activity, and the availability of newer targeted therapies, the future of BLR is uncertain.     

A phase 1/2 trial of ublituximab,a novel anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody,in patients with B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia previously exposed to rituximab

This phase 1/2 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic behavior and anti‐tumour activity of ublituximab, a unique type I, chimeric, glycoengineered anti‐CD 20 monoclonal antibody, in rituximab‐relapsed or ‐refractory patients with B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (B‐NHL ) or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL ). Induction therapy (doses of 450–1200 mg) consisted of 4 weekly infusions in cycle 1 for NHL and 3 weekly infusions in cycles 1 and 2 for CLL . Patients received ublituximab maintenance monthly during cycles 3–5, then once every 3 months for up to 2 years. Enrolled patients with B‐NHL (n  = 27) and CLL (n  = 8) had a median of 3 prior therapies. No dose‐limiting toxicities or unexpected adverse events (AE s) occurred. The most common AE s were infusion‐related reactions (40%; grade 3/4, 0%); fatigue (37%; grade 3/4, 3%); pyrexia (29%; grade 3/4, 0%); and diarrhoea (26%; grade 3/4, 0%). Common haematological AE s were neutropenia (14%; grade 3/4, 14%) and anaemia (11%; grade 3/4, 6%). The overall response rate for evaluable patients (n  = 31) was 45% (13% complete responses, 32% partial responses). Median duration of response and progression‐free survival were 9·2 months and 7·7 months, respectively. Ublituximab was well‐tolerated and efficacious in a heterogeneous and highly rituximab‐pre‐treated patient population.     

Autologous stem cell transplantation with in vivo purged progenitor cells shows long‐term efficacy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma

High‐dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown effective in the control of relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. We evaluate the long‐term outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with ASCT with in vivo purged progenitors cells. We report the long‐term results of a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial on 124 relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma patients treated with a program of anthracycline‐based debulking chemotherapy, immunochemotherapy, mobilization of in vivo purged PBSC followed by ASCT. Median age was 52 years; 14% of patients had grade 3A histology. Debulking chemotherapy produced CR in 16% and PR in 71%, while 13% of patients progressed. After rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (R‐COP), CR was obtained in 60% and PR in 35%; 118 patients successfully mobilized PBSC and 117 proceeded to ASCT. The harvest in all the 32 molecularly informative patients was bcl‐2 negative. TRM was 0%. The 5‐year PFS was 54% and the 5‐year OS was 83%. After a median f‐up of 6.7 years (range 1.5–13.6), 54% are still in CR. These data show that prolonged PFS is achievable in relapsed/refractory patients with high dose autologous transplantation of in vivo purged progenitor cells. Am. J. Hematol. 90:230–234, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Long‐term outcomes,secondary malignancies and stem cell collection following bendamustine in patients with previously treated non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

Despite the long history of bendamustine as treatment for indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, long‐term efficacy and toxicity data are minimal. We reviewed long‐term data from three clinical trials to characterize the toxicity and efficacy of patients receiving bendamustine. Data were available for 149 subjects at 21 sites. The median age was 60 years at the start of bendamustine (range 39–84), and patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies. The histologies included grades 1–2 follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 73), grade 3 FL (n = 23), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n = 20), marginal zone lymphoma (n = 15), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 9), transformed lymphomas (n = 5), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n = 2) and not reported (n = 2). The median event‐free survival was 14·1 months. Nine of 12 attempted stem cell collections were successful. With a median follow‐up of 8·9 years, 23 patients developed 25 cancers, including 8 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia. These data provide important information regarding the long‐term toxicity of bendamustine in previously treated patients. A small but meaningful number of patients achieved durable remissions following bendamustine. These rigorously collected, patient‐level, long‐term follow‐up data provide reassurance that bendamustine or bendamustine plus rituximab is associated with efficacy and safety for patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma.     

Advanced stage nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents: clinical characteristics and treatment outcome – a report from the SFCE & CCLG groups

Advanced stage nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (nLPHL ) is extremely rare in children and as a consequence, optimal treatment for this group of patients has not been established. Here we retrospectively evaluated the treatments and treatment outcomes of 41 of our patients from the UK and France with advanced stage nLPHL . Most patients received chemotherapy, some with the addition of the anti CD 20 antibody rituximab or radiotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens were diverse and followed either classical Hodgkin lymphoma or B non‐Hodgkin lymphoma protocols. All 41 patients achieved a complete remission with first line treatment and 40 patients are alive and well in remission. Eight patients subsequently relapsed and 1 patient died of secondary cancer (9 progression‐free survival events). The median time to progression for those who progressed was 21 months (5·9–73·8). The median time since last diagnosis is 87·3 months (8·44–179·20). Thirty‐six (90%), 30 (75%) and 27 (68%) patients have been in remission for more than 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. Overall, the use of rituximab combined with multi‐agent chemotherapy as first line treatment seems to be a reasonable therapeutic option.     

Double hit lymphoma: the MD Anderson Cancer Center clinical experience

We report our experience with 129 cases of double hit lymphoma (DHL), defined as B‐cell lymphoma with translocations and/or extra signals involving MYC plus BCL2 and/or BCL6. All cases were reviewed for histopathological classification. Median age was 62 years (range, 18–85), 84% of patients had advanced‐stage disease, and 87% had an International Prognostic Index score ≥2. Fourteen patients (11%) had a history of low‐grade follicular lymphoma. MYC translocation was present in 81%, and extra signals of MYC in 25% of patients. IGH‐BCL2 translocation was present in 84% and extra signals of BCL2 in 12% of patients. Two‐year event‐free survival (EFS) rates in all patients and patients who received R‐CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone), R‐EPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin), and R‐HyperCVAD/MA (rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone, alternating with cytarabine plus methotrexate) were 33%, 25%, 67% and 32%, respectively. In patients achieving complete response with initial therapy (n = 71), 2‐year EFS rates in patients who did (n = 23) or did not (n = 48) receive frontline stem cell transplantation were 68% and 53%, respectively (P = 0·155). The cumulative incidence of central nervous system involvement was 13% at 3 years. Multivariate analysis identified performance status ≥2 and bone marrow involvement as independent adverse prognostic factors for EFS and OS. Further research is needed to identify predictive and/or targetable biological markers and novel therapeutic approaches for DHL patients.     

Clinical activity of a new regimen combining gemcitabine and alemtuzumab in high‐risk relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients

Optimal treatment strategies are lacking in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Gemcitabine has shown activity and acceptable safety profile in B‐cell lymphomas. We present a retrospective case review of gemcitabine and alemtuzumab, every 21 d (for up to six courses) in 27 community‐based patients with high‐risk R/R CLL. Median age was 70 yr (44–83 yr), 55% patients had Binet stage C, deletion 17p (del(17p)) and/or deletion 11q (del(11q)) were found in 65% and 27%, bulky disease in 55.5%, and fludarabine‐refractoriness in 48% of cases, respectively. Overall response rate was 63% (29.6% clinical CR and 33.4% PR). At a median follow‐up of 31 months, median PFS and OS were 15.4 and 24 months. In multivariate analysis, median OS is influenced by prior lines of treatment = 3 and bulky disease. Combination of alemtuzumab and gemcitabine appears to be an active, easy to administrate treatment in routine practice, high‐risk R/R CLL patients.     

Phase I/II trial of vorinostat with rituximab,cyclophosphamide, etoposide and prednisone as palliative treatment for elderly patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation

The standard treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in frail elderly patients has not been established. A variation was made on rituximab (R), cyclophosphamide (C), etoposide (E), procarbazine and prednisone (P), substituting vorinostat (V) for procarbazine. Patients ≥aged 60 years with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation, were treated R‐CVEP [R 375 mg/m² intravenously (IV), day 1; C 600 mg/m² IV days 1, 8: E 70 mg/m² IV day 1, 140 mg/m² days 2, 3 orally (PO); V (300 vs. 400 mg) PO and P 60 mg/m² PO days 1–10] every 28 d for six cycles. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed in addition to response. Thirty patients (median age 76 years, 69–88) were enrolled (one died before treatment). Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for V was 300 mg. For 23 patients at MTD (six phase I + 17 phase II), two were discontinued for toxicity, one withdrew consent, eight achieved complete response (35%), five achieved partial response (22%) and seven progressed (25%). Median overall survival was 17·5 months. Median progression‐free survival was 9·2 months. Nine patients are alive. QoL declined during treatment but improved above baseline for patients who completed treatment. In conclusion, R‐CVEP was tolerated at MTD and produced durable responses with improved QoL.     

Long‐term remission in idiopathic Castleman's disease with tocilizumab followed by consolidation with high‐dose melphalan—two case studies

Multicentric Castleman's disease (MCD) is an uncommon lymphoproliferative disorder, often associated with a clinically aggressive behavior. No standard treatment has been established, but patients are usually treated with lymphoma‐type regimens such as rituximab or combination chemotherapy. Recently, immunotherapies targeting IL‐6 have proven effective and have been approved for this indication. However, these agents require long‐term administration. Here, we describe the clinical course of two patients, refractory to rituximab and chemotherapy, showing long‐term remission (18 and 24 months), following an induction phase with tocilizumab (an anti‐IL‐6 receptor antibody) and a consolidative phase with high‐dose melphalan accompanied by autologous stem cell support. This may prove to be an effective option for this group of patients with an orphan disorder.     

Long‐term follow‐up of dose‐adjusted EPOCH plus rituximab (DA‐EPOCH‐R) in untreated patients with poor prognosis large B‐cell lymphoma. A phase II study conducted by the Spanish PETHEMA Group

This prospective multi‐institutional phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of dose‐adjusted EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin) plus rituximab (DA‐EPOCH‐R) in untreated patients with poor prognosis large B‐cell lymphomas. Eighty‐one patients diagnosed with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n = 68), primary mediastinal DLBCL (n = 6) and follicular lymphoma Grade 3b (n = 7), with an age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index >1, were eligible for analysis. Median age was 60 years (range: 21–77). Sixty‐five patients (80·2%) achieved complete response. After a median follow‐up time of 64 months, 10‐year event‐free survival and overall survival (OS) were 47·8% and 63·6%, respectively. None of the studied clinical and biological characteristics were associated with poorer outcome. Interestingly, patients with BCL6 rearrangement achieved a 10‐year OS of 100%, while patients with BCL2 rearrangement exhibited a poorer outcome compared to activated B‐cell tumours and germinal centre B‐cell without BCL2 rearranged tumours. Results achieved with DA‐EPOCH‐R showed a good long‐term outcome and a tolerable toxicity profile in high‐risk large B cell lymphoma patients. Outcome was not affected by tumour cell proliferation or by cell of origin, highlighting the requirement of new biological markers for patient subclassification of high‐risk DLBCL patients.