宫颈癌淋巴结切除适应证和争议

NCCN和FIGO指南对淋巴结切除适应证做出推荐,但就宫颈癌淋巴结切除仍存在争议点。对于局部晚期宫颈癌行手术分期是安全可行的。前哨淋巴结切除术目前尚不能替代系统性淋巴结切除术。对于ⅠA2~ⅡA2期宫颈癌,建议行腹主动脉旁淋巴结取样术,上界达肠系膜下动脉水平足够。有转移肿大的淋巴结建议手术切除。     

Pelvic and para-aortic lymphatic involvement in tubal carcinoma: topography and surgical implications

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the topography of pelvic and para-aortic node involvement in Fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC). This will help us to recommend appropriate surgical treatment options to the related patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A retrospective study was performed on 19 women with PFTC who underwent a systematic bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The overall frequency of lymph node involvement was 47% (9/19). The frequency of pelvic and para-aortic metastases was 21% (4/19) and 42% (8/19) respectively. The frequency of lymph node metastases according to the stage of the disease (stage I, II and III) was : 29% (2/7), 50% (1/2) and 60% (6/10) respectively. The left para-aortic chain above the level of the inferior mesenteric artery was the site most frequently involved (75%) when para-aortic nodes were involved. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In patients with primary tubal carcinoma, the left para-aortic chain above the level of the inferior mesenteric artery is the most frequently involved. A complete lymphadenectomy (including all pelvic and para-aortic chains up to the level of the left renal vein) should be performed in patients with primary tubal carcinoma, even in patients with stage I disease.     

腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术在子宫内膜癌治疗中的临床意义

目的探讨子宫内膜癌患者腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除范围及其临床意义。方法回顾四川大学华西第二医院709例患者的临床-病理资料,随访217例行腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除患者的生存情况。结果多因素分析发现：淋巴脉管浸润及盆腔淋巴结转移是发生腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的独立高危因素（P〈0.05）。腹主动脉旁淋巴结取样组,切除至肠系膜下血管水平组以及肾血管水平组术后10月生存率分别为：98.6%,94.3%和100.0%。结论中低分化、淋巴脉管转移、特殊病理类型、以及晚期子宫内膜癌患者建议切除腹主动脉旁淋巴结,其切除范围应至肾血管水平。     

Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is part of staging in early epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and could be part of therapy in advanced EOC. However, only a minority of patients receive therapy according to guidelines or have attendance to a specialized unit. We analyzed pattern of lymphatic spread of EOC and evaluated if clinical factors and intraoperative findings reliably could predict lymph node involvement, in order to evaluate if patients could be identified in whom lymphadenectomy could be omitted and who should not be referred to a center with capacity of performing extensive gynecological operations. Retrospective analysis was carried out of all patients with EOC who had systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy during primary cytoreductive surgery. One hundred ninety-five patients underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Histologic lymph node metastases were found in 53%. The highest frequency was found in the upper left para-aortic region (32% of all patients) and between vena cava inferior and abdominal aorta (36%). Neither intraoperative clinical diagnosis nor frozen section of pelvic nodes could reliably predict para-aortic lymph node metastasis. The pathologic diagnosis of the pelvic nodes, if used as diagnostic tool for para-aortic lymph nodes, showed a sensitivity of only 50% in ovarian cancer confined to the pelvis and 73% in more advanced disease. We could not detect any intraoperative tool that could reliably predict pathologic status of para-aortic lymph nodes. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy remains part of staging in EOC. Patients with EOC should be offered the opportunity to receive state-of-the-art treatment including surgery.     

Early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma treated by surgical intent: the role of para-aortic lymph node dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Previous reports suggest that cervical adenocarcinomas have a unique pattern of spread and are more apt to metastasize to para-aortic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to further define the node of para-aortic lymph node dissection in early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma treated by surgical intent. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained to perform a computerized search of the data of all women diagnosed with cervical adenocarcinoma between 1982 and 2000. Hospital charts were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was obtained from the tumor registry, medical records, and correspondence with health care providers. RESULTS: Three hundred (87%) of 345 early-stage (FIGO IA(1)-IIA) cervical adenocarcinoma patients were primarily treated by surgical intent. Two hundred seventy-six underwent pelvic and para-aortic node dissection (n = 69) or pelvic node dissection only (n = 207); 24 had no lymph node dissection. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 13 pelvic (range, 1-58) and 3 para-aortic (range, 1-17). Three (4%) of 69 patients had para-aortic nodal metastases. Each had either grossly evident para-aortic adenopathy (n = 2) or an adnexal metastasis. Thirty-six of 40 women developing recurrent disease had at least some component of pelvic recurrence; 4 had only extrapelvic disease. Three patients undergoing para-aortic node dissection developed an isolated extrapelvic recurrence despite originally negative para-aortic nodes (n = 2) or treatment by extended-field radiation for para-aortic metastases. One woman undergoing only pelvic node dissection had an isolated extrapelvic recurrence despite originally negative nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma primarily treated by surgical intent has a very low risk of para-aortic metastases. These were detected only when there was gross evidence of nodal or adnexal disease.     

Lymph node spread in stage III or IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the rates and topography of pelvic and para-aortic nodal involvement in patients with stage III or IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PSPC). METHODS: Retrospective review of 19 women who underwent a systematic bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The overall frequency of lymph node involvement was 63% (12/19). Eighteen patients underwent complete resection of peritoneal disease. Only 4 patients underwent this procedure as part of their initial surgery (before chemotherapy). The frequency of pelvic and para-aortic metastases was 58% (11/19) and 58% (11/19), respectively. When para-aortic nodes were involved, the left para-aortic chain above the level of the inferior mesenteric artery was the site most frequently involved (72%). The event-free survival of the 18 patients without macroscopic disease at the end of debulking surgery was significantly correlated with the nodal status. None of the patients with positive nodes developed recurrent disease in abdominal nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of nodal involvement in patients with PSPC is high. The topography of nodal spread is similar to that of ovarian cancer. Lymphadenectomy has a prognostic value.     

Endometrial cancer metastatic to infrarenal aortic lymph nodes unrecognized during laparoscopic inframesenteric aortic lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND: The incidence of isolated aortic nodal metastasis in clinical stages I and II endometrial cancer is generally low. Nevertheless, para-aortic nodes are still assessed during staging procedures, which include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling up to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). The procedure can be performed either abdominally or laparoscopically. It is unclear, however, as to whether infrarenal aortic nodal sampling above the IMA should be routinely performed. CASE: We describe a case of endometrial cancer metastatic to the infrarenal para-aortic lymph nodes above the IMA, missed during laparoscopic inframesenteric lymph node dissection, and found on subsequent laparotomy performed to resect matted pelvic nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The infrarenal para-aortic region above the IMA may be at risk for nodal metastasis in women with endometrial cancer. Consideration should be given to evaluate this area during staging laparotomy or laparoscopy. The role of routine bilateral infrarenal aortic nodal dissection needs further evaluation.     

Lymphatic spread in stage Ib and II cervical carcinoma: Anatomy and surgical implications

Objective: To determine the frequency and topography of pelvic and para-aortic node involvement in cervical carcinoma and to identify the appropriate level for resection of the lymphatic chains.Methods: Between 1985 and 1994, 421 women with stage Ib or II cervical carcinoma were treated by surgery in combination with irradiation. Each underwent a radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.Results: A median of 34 lymph nodes were removed per patient. The overall frequency of lymph node involvement was 26%, and the frequency of para-aortic metastases was 8%. The frequency of lymph node metastasis was associated significantly with stage (χ² = 7.8; P < .02), tumor size (χ² = 14.8; P < .001), and patient age (χ² = 5.9; P < .05). The frequency of para-aortic involvement was below 3% in patients with small tumors (under 2 cm). When pelvic nodes were involved, the obturator group was concerned in 76 cases (18%) and the external iliac group in 48 patients (11%). When para-aortic nodes were involved, the left para-aortic chain was the most frequently concerned (23 patients [5%]). In eight of these patients, nodal involvement was found only above the level of the inferior mesenteric artery. Among 106 patients with pelvic positive nodes, 28 (26%) also had para-aortic metastatic nodes.Conclusion: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy should remove all of the left para-aortic chain (inframesenteric and supramesenteric) and so should be performed up to the level of the left renal vein. According to the low frequency of para-aortic involvement when tumor size is below 2 cm, such a procedure could be avoided in patients with small tumors.     

Pelvic and aortic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The appropriate management of advanced ovarian cancer has been controversial in recent years. There are no adequate data about the importance of lymphadenectomy and the appropriate sites for lymph node assessment. We sought to evaluate the distribution, size, and number of pelvic and aortic lymph node metastases in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 116 patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated at Mayo Clinic who underwent systematic bilateral pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy between 1996 and 2000. RESULTS: Eighty-six (78%) of 110 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy were found to have nodal metastases in 422 (16%) of 2705 pelvic nodes that were removed. Eighty-four (84%) of 100 patients had documented aortic lymph node metastases in 456 (35%) of 1313 aortic nodes that were removed. Fifty-five (59%) of 94 patients had bilateral metastatic pelvic and aortic lymph nodes and bilateral aortic lymphadenectomy was conducted in 53 (72%) of 74 patients. The most representative group for detection of nodal metastases was the aortic group (83%) followed by the external iliac group (59%) and the obturator nodes (53%). There was no significant difference between the mean size of positive (1.8 cm) and negative nodes (1.6 cm). Thirty-seven patients had unilateral tumor, and 1 patient (7%) had contralateral node metastasis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of positive nodes bilaterally and positive high aortic nodes indicates the need for bilateral pelvic and aortic node dissection (extending above the inferior mesenteric artery) in all patients regardless of laterality of the primary tumor.     

Lymph node metastasis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: A relatively high incidence of para-aortic and pelvic lymph node metastasis is found in epithelial ovarian cancer. This paper investigates the clinicomorphological features of intra-abdominal stage I epithelial ovarian cancer that may predict the occurrence of lymph node metastasis and the prognosis of patients in whom lymph node metastases are identified. METHODS: From November 1988 to December 1997 we performed systematic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy as primary surgery in 47 patients with intra-abdominal stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. The incidence of lymph node metastasis in these patients and the clinicomorphological features of the patients with lymph node involvement were examined. RESULTS: Five patients (10.6%) were metastasis positive (IC: four; IA: one), of whom four had serous adenocarcinoma. Serous adenocarcinoma was associated with a significantly higher incidence of metastases than other histological types (P < 0.05). The number of positive lymph nodes was one in four patients and two in one patient, and the metastatic sites ranged from the para-aortic to the suprainguinal lymph nodes. All five metastasis-positive patients were alive and disease free at the time of this report (survival 28-85 months: median 59 months). CONCLUSION: This clinical study suggests that serous adenocarcinoma carries a high risk of lymph node metastasis, requiring systematic lymphadenectomy for accurate staging in intra-abdominal stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.     

Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma

ObjectivesAdequate staging of advanced cervical cancer is essential in order to optimally treat the patient. FIGO clinical staging, imaging techniques such as CT scan, MRI and PET sometimes underestimate the extension of tumors. The presence of para-aortic lymph node metastases in advanced cervical cancer identifies patients with poor prognosis who need to be treated aggressively. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection is now proposed as a diagnostic tool in many guidelines. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of a robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal approach to para-aortic lymph node dissection.Study designEight patients with advanced cervical carcinoma who were eligible for primary pelvic radiotherapy combined with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy or pelvic exenteration underwent a pre-treatment robot assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy.ResultsWe isolated from 1 to 38 para-aortic nodes per patient and had one para-aortic node positive patient who was treated with extended doses of pelvic radiotherapy. We did not encounter any major complications and post-operative morbidity was low.ConclusionsRobot assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy is feasible and provides the surgeon with greater precision than classical laparoscopy. Larger prospective multicentric trials are needed to validate the generalised usefulness of this technique.     

Is there a place for a less extensive radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer patients?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the association among the pathological status of different lymph node groups and parametrium in a single institutional population of 103 locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) cases who underwent surgery after a neoadjuvant approach. A series of 29 early cervical cancer patients was also included in the analysis. METHODS: Eighty-two LACC patients with documented clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment and 29 early stage cases underwent radical surgery. The operative technique consisted of a type II-V radical hysterectomy and systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (median number of lymph nodes removed 46; range 5-140). Sixty-four cases were submitted to para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery (median number of lymph nodes removed 13; range 1-37). RESULTS: Two subgroups of lymph nodes were defined: lower pelvic lymph nodes (LPN), including obturator and external iliac nodes, and upper pelvic nodes (UPN) including common iliac, presacral, and internal iliac nodes. Metastatic UPN involvement showed a strict association with LPN involvement: in LACC cases, 6 of 7 (86%) positive UPN cases had tumor disease at the LPN level. The single positive UPN case with negative LPN was intraoperatively identified by palpation and frozen section. Similarly, in early cervical cancer patients, 100% of positive UPN cases showed metastatic involvement at the LPN level. Sixty-three of 70 (90%) LACC patients with negative histological parametrium had negative LPN. Among 12 cases with metastatic involvement of parametrium, 5 cases (41.7%) had positive LPN. In early stage cervical cancer, 23 of 27 (85%) cases with negative parametrium showed no lymph nodal involvement. Intraoperative palpation of the parametrium could identify all cases with parametrial involvement not predicted by LPN status. CONCLUSIONS: These data offer the basis for tailoring the extent of radical surgery in LACC patients, through the selection of those lymph node stations likely to provide reliable information on the pathological status of UPN and parametrium.     

Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in minimizing pelvic sidewall and para-aortic failures. METHODS: Between January 1984 and December 2001, a total of 146 patients with stage III and IV endometrial cancer and lymph node metastases were treated at our institution. Adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy was defined as the removal of more than 10 pelvic lymph nodes, and adequate para-aortic lymphadenectomy was defined as removal of 5 or more para-aortic lymph nodes. The 24 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We assessed the ability of adequate pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, together with radiotherapy, to prevent pelvic and para-aortic recurrences. RESULTS: Of the 122 patients studied, 94 (77%) had adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy and 47 (39%) had adequate para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Pelvic radiotherapy was administered to 78% and para-aortic radiotherapy to 29% of patients. Median follow-up of censored patients was 56 months. Twenty-five percent of patients had pelvic sidewall failure at 5 years. Pelvic sidewall failures at 5 years occurred in 57% of patients who had inadequate node dissection and/or no radiotherapy, compared with 10% for those having both adequate lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy (P < 0.001). After risk factor assessment in a regression model, only treatment with adequate lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy was a significant independent predictor of pelvic control (P = 0.03). The performance of definitive pelvic lymphadenectomy may have increased treatment-related morbidity in the subgroup of patients who had postoperative radiotherapy. For the 41 patients with positive para-aortic lymph nodes, the 5-year para-aortic failure rate was 34% after adequate lymphadenectomy but without adjuvant para-aortic radiotherapy. Likewise, 69% failed in the para-aortic area when adjuvant para-aortic radiotherapy was administered to patients not having adequate para-aortic lymphadenectomy; however, none of the 11 patients failed in the para-aortic area after adequate lymphadenectomy and para-aortic radiotherapy (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Adequate (pelvic and para-aortic) lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy appear complementary in reducing failures in both the pelvis and para-aortic areas in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer.     

Lymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer: difference between serous and non-serous primary tumors

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the lymph node sites most susceptible to involvement relative to primary tumor histology in ovarian cancer. METHODS: The locations of metastatic lymph nodes were investigated in 208 patients with primary ovarian cancer who underwent systemic lymphadenectomy covering both the pelvic and para-aortic regions. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis was present in 12.8% (20/156) of patients with stage I (pT1M0), 48.6% (18/37) with stage II (pT2M0), and 60% (9/15) with stage III (pT3M0) disease, thus in 22.6% (47/208) of all study patients. Isolated para-aortic nodal involvement was present in 23.3% (14/60) of patients with serous tumor and 4.1% (6/148) of those with non-serous tumor (P = 0.00002). In an analysis of 35 positive nodes from 25 patients with up to 3 positive nodes, 86.4% (19/22) of metastatic lymph nodes from patients with serous tumor were found in the para-aortic region, with 14 positive nodes located above the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and 5 below it, whereas metastasis to para-aortic lymph nodes accounted for 53.8% (7/13) of metastatic lymph nodes from patients with non-serous tumor (P = 0.0334). CONCLUSIONS: The locations of metastatic lymph nodes in ovarian cancer depend upon the histologic type of the primary cancer. In cases of serous tumor, the para-aortic region, particularly above the IMA, is the prime site for the earliest lymph node metastasis. However, the likelihood of pelvic node involvement is almost equal to that of para-aortic node involvement in cases of non-serous tumor.     

Lymph node involvement in primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube

Although the bad prognosis of primary fallopian tube carcinoma has been mostly ascribed to early lymphogenous dissemination, precise information regarding the characteristics of retroperitoneal spread are still missing. Our study was designed to evaluate the incidence and clinical significance of lymph node metastases in 33 patients with primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube. During primary surgery nine patients (27%) were submitted to systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, whereas 24 received lymph node sampling. The clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients (intraperitoneal spread, grading, peritoneal cytology, depth of tubal infiltration and residual disease after primary surgery) were compared with lymphnodal status.
Overall 15 patients (45%) had positive nodes, that is, invaded by tumor; whereas 18 (55%) showed no lymphatic spread. Six patients (40%) had exclusively positive para-aortic lymph nodes; five (33%) had only tumor metastases in pelvic lymph nodes, three (20%) manifested simultaneously pelvic and para-aortic spread, and one patient with pure primary squamous cell carcinoma had a massive groin node metastasis as presenting sign of the tumor. The rate of lymphogenous metastases was not significantly related to progressive intra-abdominal dissemination, histologic grade or depth of tubal infiltration. On the other hand, the presence of residual disease after primary surgery and positive peritoneal cytology significantly increased the risk of nodal metastases. Patients with lymph node metastasis had a significantly ( P = 0.02) worse prognosis compared with patients without nodal involvement (median survival 39 vs 58 months).
Considering the high incidence of lymph node metastasis, correct staging of tubal carcinoma should include a thorough surgical evaluation of both pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes. The role of systematic lymph node dissection in the treatment of tubal carcinoma remains controversial.     

Residual pelvic lymph node involvement after concomitant chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: Concomitant chemoradiation (and brachytherapy) has become the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancers (FIGO stage IB2 to IVA). Adjuvant surgery is optional. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of residual positive pelvic lymph nodes after chemoradiation. METHODS: From February 1988 to August 2004, 113 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer have been treated by chemoradiation followed by an adjuvant surgery with a pelvic lymphadenectomy performed (study group). A para-aortic lymphadenectomy had also been performed in 85 of them. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 48.4 years (27-74). FIGO stage was: IB2 in 17.7% (20/113), II in 44.2% (50/113), III in 21.2% (24/113) and IVA in 16.8% of the patients (19/113). The mean number of removed nodes was 11.5 (median 11) in pelvic, and 7.5 (median 7) in para-aortic basins. A pelvic lymph node involvement was present in 15.9% (18/113) of the patients after chemoradiation. In 11 patients, only one node was positive. 11.7% (10/85) of the patients had a para-aortic lymph node involvement. A residual pelvic lymph node disease has been observed in 6.3% (4/63) of the cases with no residual cervical disease (or microscopic) versus 26.5% (13/49) of the cases with macroscopic residual cervical tumor (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that a pelvic lymph node involvement persists in about 16% of the patients after chemoradiation. We can make the assumption that performing a pelvic lymphadenectomy along with the removal of the primary tumor after chemoradiation could reduce the rate of latero-pelvic recurrences, whatever the para-aortic lymph node status.     

腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除在子宫内膜癌手术治疗中的意义

目的:探讨腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除对子宫内膜癌手术病理分期及预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析我院行系统性盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除的68例子宫内膜癌患者的临床病理资料。结果:15例(22.1%)发生淋巴结转移的患者中,12例(17.6%)发生盆腔淋巴结转移,7例(10.3%)发生腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移,其中4例(5.9%)患者同时出现盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移,3例(4.4%)为单纯腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移。临床分期与手术病理分期不符合率为22.1%。术后随访6～57个月,平均26个月,获访率100%,1例复发,1例复发并死亡。结论:系统性盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术不仅对进行准确的手术病理分期,指导术后辅助治疗有重要意义,而且能提供预后相关信息。     

Role of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer

The exact role of lymphadenectomy in the management of ovarian cancer has been the object of controversy during recent years. The International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology has indicated that pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling is an integral part of the staging system of ovarian cancer. On the other hand the advantage of systematic sampling, resection of bulky nodes only, or no lymphadenectomy in terms of recurrence rate and survival of ovarian cancer patients has not yet been clearly defined. Thanks to the analysis of clinical studies on systematic lymphadenectomy, detailed anatomical studies to assess the location of lymph nodes and lymphatic spread have been recently reported.In this chapter we report the available data on clinical anatomy and pathological assessment of lymph node and lymphatic spread of ovarian cancer metastasis; we also review the clinical data on correlation of lymph node metastasis and disease status. Surgical techniques developed during years of dedication to this procedure are also described. Finally, we review and discuss the actual benefits of lymph node dissection in patients with ovarian cancer, analysing previously reported and ongoing trials.     

Methodological considerations in the analysis of the therapeutic significance of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer

There needs to be clarification on eligibility requirements and procedure standardization with regard to the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy. If this is not done, consensus on the role of lymphadenectomy will not be reached. Although pelvic lymphadenectomy is not necessary for patients with low-risk Stage I endometrial cancer, it has been suggested that combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is useful for patients with intermediate-/high-risk endometrial cancer. Therefore, the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy should be continuously evaluated. If such a study is planned, it should not include patients with low risk of nodal metastasis, and one experimental arm of the study should assess combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (fundamentally including the area above the inferior mesenteric artery and the renal vein). It is necessary to establish a pre-operative risk assessment for nodal metastasis and procedural classification of lymphadenectomy. Some pre-operative risk assessments for nodal metastasis have been proposed from Asian countries. The extent of the surgical field is defined as the pelvic area alone, or combined pelvic and para-aortic area. The thoroughness of removal can be split into removal of only suspicious nodes, selective dissection, or systematic dissection. Although randomized controlled trials provide the highest level of clinical evidence, special difficulties are presented in randomized surgical trials. Nonentry of surgeons is a threat to external validity. The role of observational studies, especially prospective cohort studies should be reconsidered when assessing the therapeutic significance of lymphadenectomy.     

Maylard incision for radical hysterectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection

Angioli R, Koechli OR, Sevin B-U. Maylard incision for radical hysterectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998; 8 : 274–278.
Although the transverse, muscle-splitting technique for abdominal incision (Maylard incision) has been described for radical hysterectomy and for lymph node dissection of the pelvis and para-aortic area, the adequacy of the procedure performed through this incision has not been assessed. From 1991 to 1994, 205 patients underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node (PLN) and para-aortic lymph node (PALN) dissection at the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital/University of Miami School of Medicine. Twenty-four patients with cervical cancer stage IB-IIA underwent radical hysterectomy, pelvic lymph node and para-aortic lymph node dissection through a Maylard incision. Three patients had panniculectomy performed at the same time. Duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes removed and duration of hospital stay were within acceptable ranges. Postoperative and intraoperative complications were minimal. Excellent cosmetic results were obtained. In conclusion, the Maylard incision offers good exposure to the pelvic and para-aortic area for lymph node dissection, good cosmetic result, and can be performed in association with abdominoplasty. Complications are similar to those observed with a vertical skin incision. This type of incision should be considered in selected young patients with early cervical cancer and in obese patients desiring abdominoplasty.