Quality-of-life issues in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is responsible for more than 1.5 million fractures per year in the United States including vertebral and nonvertebral fractures of the hip and wrist. Most of the impact of osteoporosis on quality of life relates to fracture. While the morbidity and mortality of hip fractures have long been recognized, only recently have we also recognized the significant burden of vertebral fractures. With the development of generic and disease targeted quality-of-life instruments we have now confirmed observational studies showing that clinical vertebral fractures have significant effects on quality of life. The economic burden of vertebral fractures, if we include direct and indirect costs, may be similar to hip fractures. The relative risk for mortality after clinical vertebral fracture is at least equivalent to that of hip fracture. The burden of vertebral fractures relates not only to pain but also to kyphosis. Because vertebral fractures are often under diagnosed and under treated, these findings are a call to action because the first vertebral fracture leads to significantly increased risk for subsequent vertebral and osteoporotic fracture with further loss of quality of life.     

Osteoporosis and fragility fractures: Vertebral fractures

The incidence of vertebral fragility fractures and deformity increase steeply with age. Every sixth woman and every twelfth man will sustain a symptomatic vertebral fracture. Vertebral fractures result in pain, functional disability and decreased quality of life, which may last for several years, and may also affect mortality. The patient with an acute fracture should be examined with radiology for diagnosis. In case of a low-energy fracture, osteoporosis should be suspected and investigated. If the pain management fails, vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty could be considered. Braces may be used, but evidence for its effect is lacking. In the rare event of neurological compromise, or unstable fractures, surgical treatment should be considered. After vertebral fragility fractures, the risk for new fractures is high and secondary preventive measures advocated. The best evidence for secondary prevention is currently on medical treatment of osteoporosis.     

Osteoporosis in men

Osteoporosis is characterized by a reduction in bone density, associated with skeletal fragility and an increased risk of fracture after minimal trauma. Although osteoporosis is generally considered to be a condition affecting post-menopausal women, it is now clear that substantial bone loss occurs with advancing age in men, such that up to 20% of symptomatic vertebral fractures and 30% of hip fractures occur in men. This chapter highlights the incidence and prevalence of osteoporotic fractures in men and reviews the associated morbidity, excess mortality and health and social service expenditure. The determinants of peak bone mass and bone loss in men are discussed, as is the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and vertebral and hip fractures. The criteria for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men are reviewed, together with the most appropriate investigations for secondary osteoporosis. The management of osteoporosis in men is also discussed, highlighting the most appropriate treatment options.     

Postmenopausal osteoporosis: fracture consequences and treatment efficacy vary by skeletal site

At least half of all postmenopausal women will experience fractures during their lifetime, and the consequences are often serious, but most women at risk are not receiving adequate treatment. The objective of this paper is to summarize the literature concerning the consequences of osteoporotic fractures, and the effectiveness of pharmacologic agents for preventing fractures and their consequences, emphasizing a systematic, evidence-based summary of treatment results from randomized, controlled trials that were published previously. Osteoporosis is associated with increased risk of fractures at most skeletal sites. Hip fractures have much greater prognostic significance in terms of health than any other single type of fracture. However, symptomatic vertebral fractures and other non-hip fractures also represent enormous morbidity and economic burdens, and signal increased risk of future fractures of all types, including the hip. There is convincing evidence that two bisphosphonates (alendronate and risedronate) reduce the risk of both spine and non-spine fractures. The evidence for reducing hip fracture risk is greater for alendronate, with a consistent approximately 50% reduction in hip fractures across studies. Alendronate has also been demonstrated to maintain quality of life by reducing outcomes such as hospitalization and bed rest related to back pain. Among other agents, raloxifene reduces the risk of vertebral fractures by approximately 30%; the published evidence for most other agents is inconclusive. Osteoporosis should be regarded as seriously as other important chronic disorders such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Postmenopausal patients with a high risk of fractures--such as those with prior fractures or osteoporosis as measured by BMD--need to be treated. Although other therapeutic modalities are available, the evidence is most convincing for the bisphosphonates, alendronate and risedronate.     

Osteoporosis: the evolution of a diagnosis

The global trend towards increased longevity has resulted in ageing populations and a rise in diseases or conditions that primarily affect older persons. One such condition is osteoporosis (fragile or porous bones), which causes an increased fracture risk. Vertebral and hip fractures lead to increased morbidity and mortality and result in enormous healthcare costs. Here, we review the evolution of the diagnosis of osteoporosis. In an attempt to separate patients with normal bones from those with osteoporosis and to define the osteoporosis diagnosis, multiple factors and characteristics have been considered. These include pathology and histology of the disease, the endocrine regulation of bone metabolism, bone mineral density (BMD), fracture type or trauma severity, risk models for fracture prediction, and thresholds for pharmacological intervention. The femoral neck BMD ?2.5 SDs cut‐off for the diagnosis of osteoporosis is arbitrarily chosen, and there is no evidence to support the notion that fracture location (except vertebral fractures) or severity is useful to discriminate osteoporotic from normal bones. Fracture risk models (including factors unrelated to bone) dissociate bone strength from the diagnosis, and treatment thresholds are often based on health‐economic considerations rather than bone properties. Vertebral fractures are a primary feature of osteoporosis, characterized by decreased bone mass, strength and quality, and a high risk of another such fracture that can be considerably reduced by treatment. We believe that the 2001 definition of osteoporosis by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis is still valid and useful: ‘Osteoporosis is defined as a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength predisposing a person to an increased risk of fracture’.     

Leitliniengerechte Diagnostik und Therapie der Osteoporose 2010

Osteoporotic fractures are a frequent cause of disability and loss of quality of life in old age. Maintaining muscle function and balance, a daily calcium intake of 1000 mg, sufficient vitamin D and prudent use of drugs associated with falls and osteoporosis are key components to fracture prevention. The German guideline recommends that a specific long-term osteoporosis medication be initiated in individuals with a 30% 10-year risk for hip fractures and vertebral fractures.     

Vertebral fracture assessment using standard bone densitometry equipment predicts incident fractures in women

Vertebral fractures are the most common fracture among the elderly, have a detrimental effect on patients' quality of life, and increase the risk of future fractures. Yet, two-thirds of vertebral fractures remain undiagnosed; therefore, improved detection methods are needed. In this Practice Point commentary, we discuss the study by McCloskey et al., in which low radiation dose imaging with a bone densitometer was used for vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in a prospective cohort of elderly women. Participants were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the oral bisphosphonate clodronate. Prevalent vertebral fractures detected by VFA were associated with an elevated risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures, including hip fractures. This finding remained significant after adjustment for age, weight and treatment effect, and in a few instances even after adjustment for femoral BMD. Here, we highlight the importance of identifying vertebral fractures, and the potentially substantial role of VFA in the clinical evaluation and management of patients suspected to have osteoporosis.     

A clinical tool to determine the necessity of spine radiography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis presenting with back pain

BACKGROUND: Vertebral fractures are underdiagnosed, although the resulting mortality and morbidity in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis is now recognised. In a population of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and back pain, symptoms may be related to vertebral fractures or degenerative changes of the spine. AIM: To evaluate a population of postmenopausal women presenting with back pain and factors associated with vertebral fractures which were assessable in a clinical setting in order to determine the necessity for spine radiography. METHODS: Patient questioning and physical examination were carried out and spinal radiographic data collected from 410 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, with an average age of 74 years, who consulted a rheumatologist for back pain. Of these, 215 (52.4%) patients were diagnosed with at least one vertebral fracture. Logistic regression was used to identify the most relevant clinical features associated with existing vertebral fractures, and to derive a quantitative index of risk. RESULTS: The model included six parameters: age, back pain intensity, height loss, history of low trauma non-vertebral fractures, thoracic localisation of back pain and sudden occurrence of back pain. The scoring system, or the quantitative index, had a maximal score of 16. For a score >or=7, the probability of existing vertebral fracture was >or=43%. The correlation between this quantitative index and the logistic model probability was 0.98, suggesting an excellent and highly significant approximation of the original prediction equation. CONCLUSIONS: From six clinical items, an index was built to identify women with osteoporosis and back pain who should have spine radiography. This simple tool may help clinicians to optimise vertebral fracture diagnosis and to make a proper therapeutic decision.     

Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study

BACKGROUND: Strontium ranelate, a new oral drug shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, was studied in the Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study to assess its efficacy and safety in preventing nonvertebral fractures also. METHODS: Strontium ranelate (2 g/d) or placebo were randomly allocated to 5091 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in a double-blind placebo-controlled 5-yr study with a main statistical analysis over 3 yr of treatment. FINDINGS: In the entire sample, relative risk (RR) was reduced by 16% for all nonvertebral fractures (P = 0.04), and by 19% for major fragility fractures (hip, wrist, pelvis and sacrum, ribs and sternum, clavicle, humerus) (P = 0.031) in strontium ranelate-treated patients in comparison with the placebo group. Among women at high risk of hip fracture (age > or = 74 yr and femoral neck bone mineral density T score < or = -3, corresponding to -2.4 according to NHANES reference) (n = 1977), the RR reduction for hip fracture was 36% (P = 0.046). RR of vertebral fractures was reduced by 39% (P < 0.001) in the 3640 patients with spinal x-rays and by 45% in the subgroup without prevalent vertebral fracture. Strontium ranelate increased bone mineral density throughout the study, reaching at 3 yr (P < 0.001): +8.2% (femoral neck) and +9.8% (total hip). Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that strontium ranelate significantly reduces the risk of all nonvertebral and in a high-risk subgroup, hip fractures over a 3-yr period, and is well tolerated. It confirms that strontium ranelate reduces vertebral fractures. Strontium ranelate offers a safe and effective means of reducing the risk of fracture associated with osteoporosis.     

Strontium ranelate: vertebral and non-vertebral fracture risk reduction

Fractures are common at the spine and hip, but at least half the morbidity and mortality of fractures in the community come from fractures that involve other sites. Over half of all fractures arise in individuals without osteoporosis, whereas the highest risk group for fractures are individuals over 80 years of age. Reducing the burden of fractures should thus include an assessment of drug efficacy against all fractures in a wide range of individuals. For vertebral fractures, in the phase III Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention study of 1649 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 2 g strontium ranelate a day produced a risk reduction of 49% in the first year and 41% during 3 years. In the TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis study, which was designed to examine the effect of strontium ranelate on non-vertebral fractures, of the 5091 patients, 3640 had spine X-rays. The vertebral fracture risk reduction was 45% at one year and 39% over 3 years. In a preplanned pooling of the above two studies, 1170 patients had vertebral osteopenia. Strontium ranelate reduced the risk of vertebral fracture in 3 years by 40% in these patients. In 409 patients with lumbar or femoral neck osteopenia, strontium ranelate reduced the risk of vertebral fractures by 62% over 3 years. In the pre-planned pooling of data from the two studies, in 1488 women aged between 80 and 100 years (mean age 84 +/- 3 years), the risk of vertebral fractures was reduced in one year by 59% and by 32% over 3 years. For non-vertebral fractures, in the TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis study, treatment for 3 years reduced the fracture risk by 16%, and by 19% for major fragility fractures. In a post-hoc analysis of 1977 women at high risk of hip fracture (aged > or = 74 years and with a femoral neck bone mineral density T-score < or = -2.4) the hip fracture risk was reduced by 36%. In patients aged 80 and over in the pre-planned pooling of data from the two studies, the risk of an incident non-vertebral fracture was reduced by 41% in the first year and by 31% over 3 years. Strontium ranelate, a new anti-osteoporosis agent, has a broad range of antifracture efficacy.     

Selective estrogen-receptor modulators

Tamoxifen is useful for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer and in some women for the prevention of breast cancer. The risk-benefit ratio in regard to the skeleton and perhaps other organ systems may very well be different for postmenopausal versus premenopausal women. In postmenopausal women, tamoxifen (20 mg/d) increased BMD in the spine and perhaps the hip; however, the effect on fracture risk is unclear. Therefore, for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, consideration should be given to the addition of an agent that is shown to have efficacy against fractures (such as bisphosphonates), even while these women are on tamoxifen. For women at only modest or moderate risk, with bone density above the osteoporosis range (T score above -2.5) and no major fracture history, tamoxifen is probably adequate for 5 years of use. Potentially serious adverse effects include venous thromboembolism, uterine cancer, benign uterine disease, and cataracts. Raloxifene (60 mg/d) protects against vertebral fractures over 4 years in women with osteoporosis, produces small increases in bone mass of the spine, hip, and total body, and reduces bone turnover in postmenopausal women with or without osteoporosis. No significant effect has yet been demonstrated on nonvertebral fractures after 4 years of treatment. Raloxifene has the additional benefit of substantially reducing the risk of ER-positive invasive breast cancer and does not increase the risk of uterine disease. Raloxifene increases the risk of venous thromboembolic disease to the same degree as tamoxifen and estrogen. Therefore, SERMS and estrogens are generally contraindicated in women with a previous history of venous thromboembolism or those who are at significantly increased risk. Raloxifene is probably most useful in women who have osteoporosis (T score = -2.5) or who are at risk (T score less than -1.5 with clinical risk factors) in the middle menopausal period (age 55-65) or in the early menopausal period in women who have no significant hot flashes. At this stage in life, vertebral fractures are common, but hip fractures are not. Therefore, women who take raloxifene can expect a reduction in the likelihood of having a vertebral fracture, and possibly breast cancer. The lack of definitive efficacy against hip fracture is not a major deterrent to use of this agent in this age group because hip fracture risk is very low. Raloxifene might not be the treatment of choice for elderly women who are at particularly high risk of hip fracture.     

绝经后妇女脊椎压缩性骨折与骨密度的关系

目的探讨绝经后妇女脊椎压缩性骨折与骨密度（BMD）的关系。方法为病例一对照研究，入选250例有脊椎压缩性骨折的绝经后妇女，另有250名无脊椎压缩性骨折的绝经后妇女作为对照组。两组均有胸腰椎正侧位X线摄片，并应用双能X线吸收仪检测腰椎1～4和左股骨近端各部位BMD。结果脊椎压缩性骨折组身高、体重、腰椎2～4和股骨近端各部位BMD值均显著低于对照组（均P〈0．01）。腰椎2～4BMD是发生脊柱骨折的预报因子（r=-0．416，P〈0．01）。身高和全髋部BMD与骨折次数和骨折椎体数目呈负相关（均P〈0．01）。按股骨颈和全髋部BMD值，骨折组骨质疏松检出率各为50．8％和50．4％；另外剔除在腰椎2～4发生椎体骨折53例，按腰椎2～4BMD检出骨质疏松占64．5％。同时，腰椎2～4、股骨颈或全髋部BMD值低于-2．5s者发生脊柱压缩性骨折的风险分别是BMD正常者的4．76、2．36和3．52倍。结论腰椎呈低骨量是发生脊椎压缩性骨折的重要危险因素。身高的下降和全髋部低BMD值是骨折发生次数和受累椎体数目的危险因子；对绝经后妇女在重视BMD测量的同时，应重视脊柱X线正侧位检查。     

Vertebral fragility fractures – How to treat them?

Approximately 20% of men and women aged 50 years or older will present with a vertebral fragility fracture - a prevalence that steadily increases with age. The condition may be associated with severe pain and disability, significant reductions in overall quality of life, mobility, social participation, sleep quality and increased fear for the future. There is, however, no current consensus on what constitutes the best management of symptomatic vertebral fractures. Moreover, evidence supporting common treatment approaches is scarce and often of poor quality. The lack of adequate management of VFF and associated osteoporosis and the burden of this condition to patient and society are estimated to increase substantially in coming years as recurrent, disabling episodes are set to occur. This chapter will address these issues, including a discussion on existing care pathways for vertebral fragility fractures, and an overview of the evidence supporting recommendations of the main international clinical practice guidelines.     

Treating osteoporosis to prevent fractures: current concepts and future developments

Antiresorptive drugs, such as the bisphosphonates and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab, are currently the most widely used osteoporosis medications. These drugs increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the risk of vertebral (by 40–70%), nonvertebral (by 25–40%) and hip fractures (by 40–53%) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Due to the risk of rare side‐effects, the use of bisphosphonates has been limited to up to 10 years with oral bisphosphonates and 6 years with intravenous zoledronic acid. Despite their well‐proven efficacy and safety, few women at high risk of fracture are started on treatment. Case finding strategies, such as fracture risk‐based screening in primary care using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and Fracture Liaison Services, have proved effective in increasing treatment rates and reducing fracture rates. Recently, anabolic therapy with teriparatide was demonstrated to be superior to the bisphosphonate risedronate in preventing vertebral and clinical fractures in postmenopausal women with vertebral fracture. Treatment with the sclerostin antibody romosozumab increases BMD more profoundly and rapidly than alendronate and is also superior to alendronate in reducing the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. For patients with severe osteoporosis and high fracture risk, bisphosphonates alone are unlikely to be able to provide long‐term protection against fracture and restore BMD. For those patients, sequential treatment, starting with a bone‐building drug (e.g. teriparatide), followed by an antiresorptive, will likely provide better long‐term fracture prevention and should be the golden standard of future osteoporosis treatment.     

Osteoporosis a disease for all; in Lebanon

Osteoporosis is the most important metabolic disease leading to fracture and high mortality morbidity rates. With the increase of aging population, mainly in the developing work, it is estimated that the incidence of fracture will rise too. Osteoporosis known in the past to be a woman disease, it is now accepted that it affects man too. The risk factors for osteoporosis are known now, but one vertebral fracture, leading to more vertebral fractures and increasing the risk of hip fracture, stands by itself as an independent risk factor for osteoporosis even if BMD is normal or osteopenic. Vertebral fracture is associated with high mortality rate. At the same time it is work noting that osteoporosis in man is different than in women and finally we have now the means to diagnose correctly the disease, evaluate the fracture risk, treat and monitor the treatment. But incidence, fracture rate, peak bone mass in Lebanon are different than the European or North American one.     

Aging bone and osteoporosis: strategies for preventing fractures in the elderly

As the older population increases, the incidence of osteoporotic fractures is expected to dramatically rise during the next few decades. Older patients are much more susceptible to fracture at any given bone mineral density (BMD) than are younger patients because of various factors, including the quality of aging bone, which involves more than BMD. Suppression of increased bone turnover by antiresorptive therapies, even with only small changes in BMD, can reduce fracture risk, especially in the lumbar spine. Bisphosphonate treatment can significantly reduce vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, including hip fractures, even in the very elderly. Prospective analyses show that risedronate therapy consistently and significantly reduces the risk of new morphometric vertebral fractures after 1 year in postmenopausal women. Post hoc analyses report significant reductions in the risk of 1 new clinical vertebral fracture after 6 months of risedronate therapy and after 1 year of alendronate therapy. Oral raloxifene therapy and salmon calcitonin nasal spray therapy have been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral fracture after 3 and 5 years, respectively, and post hoc data show a significant reduction in clinical vertebral fracture risk at 1 year with raloxifene use. However, neither raloxifene therapy nor calcitonin therapy reduce the risk of nonvertebral and hip fractures at currently approved doses. Bisphosphonates have been shown to be safe and efficacious with 7 years' risedronate sodium and 10 years' alendronate sodium data published, and bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover and increase BMD to a greater degree than raloxifene and calcitonin, which may partly account for their nonvertebral and hip fracture reduction effect. Therefore, bisphosphonate therapy with risedronate or alendronate should be considered in patients with low BMD at the hip and in older patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia, particularly those with an existing fracture.     

How to manage postmenopausal osteoporosis?

Osteoporosis is characterized by reduced bone mass and disruption of bone architecture, resulting in increased fracture risk. Several therapeutic agents are now available to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis and prevent fractures. Combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation reduce the relative risk of non-vertebral fractures by about 18%. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) should not be prescribed for osteoporosis in women who do not experience menopausal symptoms. The marked benefits of raloxifene on the reduction in invasive breast cancer and vertebral fracture risk are partially counterbalanced by a lack of effect on non-vertebral fracture risk, and an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and stroke. All four bisphosphonates available in Belgium, except ibandronate, have been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures in prospective, placebo-controlled trials. Globally, the incidence of vertebral fractures is reduced by 41%-70%, and the incidence of non-vertebral fractures by 25%-39%. The anti-fracture efficacy of weekly or monthly doses of oral bisphosphonates has not been directly shown but is assumed from bridging studies based on BMD changes. To date, the various bisphosphonates have not been studied in head-to-head comparative trials with fracture endpoints. There are potential concerns that long-term suppression of bone turnover associated with bisphosphonate treatment may eventually lead to adverse effects, especially atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, but these cases are extremely rare. Teri-paratide (recombinant human 1-34 PTH) administered by daily subcutaneous injections decreases by 65% the relative risk of new vertebral fractures in patients with severe osteoporosis. Pivotal trials with strontium ranelate have shown a 41% reduction in new vertebral fractures and a 16% reduction in non-vertebral fractures over 3 years. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANK Ligand that is administered as a 60-mg subcutaneous injection every 6 months. In the pivotal phase III trial, there was a 68% reduction in the incidence of new vertebral fractures, whereas the incidence of non-vertebral fractures was reduced by 20%. Several new approaches are being explored, including antibodies to sclerostin, cathepsin K inhibitors, src kinase inhibitors, and drugs that act on calcium sensing receptors.     

Effects of long-term strontium ranelate treatment on the risk of nonvertebral and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis: Results of a five-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the effect of strontium ranelate on nonvertebral and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 5,091 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to receive either strontium ranelate at 2 gm/day or placebo for 5 years. The main efficacy criterion was the incidence of nonvertebral fractures. In addition, incidence of hip fractures was assessed, by post hoc analysis, in the subset of 1,128 patients who were at high risk of fractures (age 74 years or older with lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density T scores -2.4 or less). The incidence of new vertebral fractures was assessed, using the semiquantitative method described by Genant, in the 3,646 patients in whom spinal radiography (a nonmandatory procedure) was performed during the course of the study. Fracture data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method. RESULTS: Of the 5,091 patients, 2,714 (53%) completed the study up to 5 years. The risk of nonvertebral fracture was reduced by 15% in the strontium ranelate group compared with the placebo group (relative risk 0.85 [95% confidence interval 0.73-0.99]). The risk of hip fracture was decreased by 43% (relative risk 0.57 [95% confidence interval 0.33-0.97]), and the risk of vertebral fracture was decreased by 24% (relative risk 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.88]) in the strontium ranelate group. After 5 years, the safety profile of strontium ranelate remained unchanged compared with the 3-year findings. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with strontium ranelate results in a sustained reduction in the incidence of osteoporotic nonvertebral fractures, including hip fractures, and vertebral fractures over 5 years.     

Raloxifene for older women: a review of the literature

Raloxifene is a non-steroidal selective estrogen-receptor modulator (SERM) which is used for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Raloxifene decreases the incidence of vertebral fractures by 30%–50% in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis but has not been shown to decrease the incidence of hip fractures or other non-vertebral fractures. At the present time, estrogen-replacement therapy and bisphosphonate treatment are the only medical treatments that are proven to prevent hip fractures with the exception of vitamin D and calcium replacement, which has been shown to prevent hip fractures in elderly individuals and nursing home residents. Raloxifene has been shown to have additive effects on bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) when used along with alendronate and teriparatide. Raloxifene could have a role in renal failure as it has been shown to increase BMD of the vertebra over 1 year of therapy. Raloxifene is as effective as tamoxifen in reducing the risk of invasive breast cancer. The increased incidence of venous thromboembolism is the main concern of raloxifene therapy and previous history of venous thromboembolism is a contraindication for use of raloxifene. Raloxifene has a role in treatment of vertebral osteoporosis in older women. The decision to use raloxifene should be based on evaluation of fracture risk and on potential other benefits than fracture reduction along with consideration of side effects.