Living Donor Renal Transplantation Using Alemtuzumab Induction and Tacrolimus Monotherapy

Alemtuzumab was used as an induction agent in 205 renal transplant recipients undergoing 207 living donor renal transplants. All donor kidneys were recovered laparoscopically. Postoperatively, patients were treated with tacrolimus monotherapy, and immunosuppression was weaned when possible. Forty-seven recipients of living donor renal transplants prior to the induction era who received conventional triple drug immunosuppression without antibody induction served as historic controls. The mean follow-up was 493 days in the alemtuzumab group and 2101 days in the historic control group. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival were 98.6% and 98.1% in the alemtuzumab group, compared to 93.6% and 91.5% in the control group, respectively. The incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) at 1 year was 6.8% in the alemtuzumab group and 17.0% (p < 0.05) in the historic control group. Most (81.3%) episodes of ACR in the alemtuzumab group were Banff 1 (a or b) and were sensitive to steroid pulses for the treatment of rejection. There was no cytomegalovirus disease or infection. The incidence of delayed graft function was 0%, and the incidence of posttransplant insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was 0.5%. This study represents the largest series to date of live donor renal transplant recipients undergoing alemtuzumab induction, and confirms the short-term safety and efficacy of this approach.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Kidney Transplantation: Comparison with Basiliximab Induction—Long-Term Results

This study examined alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and basiliximab (anti-CD 25, Simulect) as induction immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We used a single-center, nonrandomized, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate outcomes in kidney transplant recipients given either alemtuzumab (n = 123) or basiliximab (n = 155) induction in combination with a prednisone-free maintenance protocol using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent, donor source and recipient ethnicity. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function and the etiology of infectious complications. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and basiliximab. A lower rate of early (<3 months) rejection was observed in the alemtuzumab (4.1%) versus the basiliximab (11.6%) group, but the rates for both groups were equivalent at 1 year. Patient and kidney survival and rejection rates were nearly identical between Caucasians and African Americans that received alemtuzumab. Quality of renal function and incidence of infectious complications were similar in the two groups. Alemtuzumab induction therapy was similar in efficacy to basiliximab in a prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol for an ethnically diverse population of kidney transplant recipients.     

Opportunistic Infections After Induction With Alemtuzumab or Basiliximab: A 3-Year Kidney Transplantation Experience

BackgroundAntibody induction immunosuppression is commonly used in kidney transplantation to decrease the risk of early acute rejection. However, infectious complications may arise in patients treated with higher intensity induction immunosuppression. In this study, we compared the rate of opportunistic infections during the 3 years after kidney transplantation in recipients who received either alemtuzumab or basiliximab for induction therapy.MethodsAll renal transplant recipients from our center who received induction with alemtuzumab between 2011 and 2016 were included and matched 1:2 (by age and date of transplant) to renal transplant recipients who received basiliximab. The primary outcome was the rate of opportunistic infections.ResultsTwenty-seven patients received alemtuzumab (mean age = 50.8 years; SD ±12), and 54 received basiliximab (mean age = 50.8 years; SD ±11.8). Infections within 3 years posttransplant were not different between groups: BK viremia (P = .99), BK nephritis (P = .48), cytomegalovirus infection (P = .13), varicella zoster virus (P = .22), and all infections (P = .87). Time to infection (P = .67), patient survival (P = .21), and time to rejection (P = .098) were similar in both groups. There were also no group differences in delayed graft function (P = .76), graft loss (P = .97), or rejection (P = .2).ConclusionThe rate of infection was not significantly increased in recipients receiving lymphocyte-depleting alemtuzumab compared to recipients receiving basiliximab induction therapy, despite receiving similar maintenance immunosuppression. Although the immunologic risks differed between the 2 groups, there was no observable difference in clinical outcomes.     

Comparison of alemtuzumab vs. antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in primary non‐sensitized renal transplant patients treated with rapid steroid withdrawal

Alemtuzumab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) are commonly used for induction therapy in renal transplantation. This retrospective, single‐center, cohort study evaluated cumulative incidence of one‐yr biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) among 200 consecutive primary non‐sensitized kidney transplant recipients who received either alemtuzumab (n = 100) or rATG (n = 100) induction followed by rapid steroid taper, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Protocol biopsies, plasma and urine BK virus PCR, serum creatinine and iothalamate glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), were obtained at 1, 4, and 12 months from transplantation. The one‐yr BPAR rates were similar between the alemtuzumab and rATG groups; however, rejection Banff IA and higher was more common in the alemtuzumab arm (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.047). After adjusting for confounding variables, alemtuzumab was still associated with Banff IA and higher rejection (adjusted OR: 3.7, CI: 1.2–10.5, p = 0.02). Despite similar rates of BK viremia, more patients in the alemtuzumab arm developed BK nephropathy (16% vs. 3%, p = 0.046). One‐year iGFR (53.4 ± 20.2 vs. 71.9 ± 27.2 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.002) and three‐yr graft survival (89.5% vs. 95%, p = 0.05) were lower in the alemtuzumab group. In low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients on steroid‐free immunosuppression, alemtuzumab was associated with more severe rejection and BK nephropathy compared to rATG.     

Improved efficacy of basiliximab over antilymphocyte globulin induction therapy in paediatric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab is a chimeric human/mouse monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of the IL-2 receptor, CD25, which has been reported as successfully reducing rejection in adult renal transplant recipients. Reported clinical experience of basiliximab in paediatric renal transplantation is limited. METHODS: Using two intravenous doses on day 0 (pre-operatively) and day 4 with prednisolone and cyclosporin A (dual) maintenance immunosuppression in 42 children undergoing renal transplantation in our unit (SIM group), we have compared patient and graft outcome, rejection rates in the first 6 months, renal function and the incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection with 42 consecutive children who previously received antilymphocyte globulin immunoprophylaxis with prednisolone, cyclosporin A and azathioprine (triple) maintenance immunosuppression (ALG group). The two groups were similar, including HLA mismatching, apart from age and size at transplantation (SIM=10.3+/-5.4 years vs ALG=12.4+/-4.2 years, P<0.05). RESULTS: One patient in the SIM group died from food inhalation with a functioning kidney and one patient in the ALG group from Pneumocystis pneumonia and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders with a rejecting graft. Both 1- and 2-year actuarial graft survivals were 93% for the SIM group and 86% for the ALG group (NS). Three grafts were lost in the SIM group-none from rejection (thrombosis 2, death 1)-and seven in the ALG group-three from rejection. Occurrence of biopsy documented rejection in the first 6 months after transplantation was 0.15+/-0.22 for the SIM group and 0.35+/-0.51 episodes per pt-month at risk for ALG treatment (P<0.04). Early rejection within 30 post-operative days occurred in only four SIM patients, three of whom had undergone retransplantation. Forty-seven per cent of rejection episodes occurred between days 30 and 44 in SIM treated patients. Switching to tacrolimus was similar in both groups; 24% of the SIM groups were prescribed triple therapy. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was 46.0 and 46.2 ml/min for SIM and ALG groups, respectively, six months after transplantation. Ten per cent of SIM and 19% of ALG treated patients developed clinically significant CMV infection (NS) but none of 16 (R(+)) SIM children had CMV infection compared with 8 out of 15 (R(+)) ALG patients (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab immunoprophylaxis and dual therapy reduces rejection episodes in the first six months and maintains graft survival and function after paediatric renal transplantation. Seventy-six per cent of children receiving basiliximab immunoprophylaxis were successfully maintained on long-term dual immunosuppression. This immunosuppressive protocol reduces CMV disease in CMV(+) recipients compared with ALG induction and triple therapy.     

Should heart,lung, and liver transplant recipients receive immunosuppression induction for kidney transplantation?

Ranney DN, Englesbe MJ, Muhammad W, Al‐Holou SN, Park JM, Pelletier SJ, Punch JD, Lynch RJ. Should heart, lung, and liver transplant recipients receive immunosuppression induction for kidney transplantation?
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 67–72. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: As the outcomes of heart, liver, and lung transplantation continue to improve, more patients will present for subsequent renal transplantation. It remains unclear whether these patients benefit from induction immunosuppression. We retrospectively reviewed induction on solid organ graft recipients who underwent renal transplant at our center from January 1, 1995 to March 30, 2007. Induction and the non‐induction groups were compared by univariate and Kaplan–Meier analyses. There were 21 patients in each group, with mean follow‐up of 4.5–6.0 years. Forty‐seven percent of patients receiving induction had a severe post‐operative infection, compared with 28.6% in the non‐induction group (p = NS). The one yr rejection rate in the induction group was 9.5% compared with 14.3% for non‐induction (p = NS). One‐yr graft survival was 81.0% and 95.2% in the induction and non‐induction group (p = NS). In summary, there is a trend toward lower patient and graft survival among patients undergoing induction. These trends could relate to selection bias in the decision to prescribe induction immunosuppression, but further study is needed to better define the risks and benefits of antibody‐induction regimens in this population.     

Alemtuzumab induction and triple maintenance immunotherapy in kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death.

We have used alemtuzumab in combination with triple maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplantation from donors after cardiac death between 2002 and 2006. We compared outcomes of induction therapy with alemtuzumab with interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor antagonists (RA) and anti-lymphocyte antibodies. We used a retrospective sequential study design to examine 170 recipients of kidneys from donor after cardiac death (DCD) for survival, graft survival, time to first rejection, glomerular filtration and complications. Patients were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the following criteria: panel of reactive antibodies >20%, retransplants, Afro-American race. Induction with alemtuzumab was compared with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in the high-risk and with IL-2RA in the low-risk group. Patients received triple immunosuppression with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitors. Patient survival, graft survival, rejection rate and glomerular filtration rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab versus IL-2RAs or ATG. There was a trend towards reduced graft- and patient survival in the alemtuzumab group. There was an increased incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in the alemtuzumab-induced group and a trend towards increased BK virus and bacterial infections. Induction of DCD kidney transplants with alemtuzumab compared to IL-2RA and ATG has no significant impact on acute rejection. It appears however that CMV infections are increased in patients induced with alemtuzumab. We therefore conclude that induction with alemtuzumab does not confer any advantage over traditional induction agents.     

Should living-unrelated renal transplant recipients receive antibody induction? Results of a clinical experience trial

BACKGROUND: Living-donor kidney transplant recipients generally do not receive antibody induction. Induction avoidance may not be appropriate, particularly for living-unrelated renal transplant (LURT) recipients, in whom matching may not be optimal. We compared the incidence of acute rejection and graft outcome of LURT recipients who were administered no induction and cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients who were administered anti-CD25 antibody. These groups both had immediate graft function and similar maintenance immunosuppression. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients who received kidney transplants between 1999 and 2000. CRT recipients received basiliximab, corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and delayed tacrolimus (serum creatinine <3 mg/dL). LURT recipients received tacrolimus (initiated pretransplantation), MMF, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: The analysis included 136 LURT recipients and 126 CRT recipients. CRT recipients included more African Americans (52.4% vs. 30.9%, P<0.01). LURT recipients included more patients with at least one human leukocyte antigen mismatch (97.8% vs. 85.7%, P<0.01). A higher acute rejection rate was observed in LURT recipients at both 6 months (LURT recipients 19.1% vs. CRT recipients 3.2%, P<0.01) and 1 year (21.3% vs. 4.0%, P<0.0004); a higher rate also was observed in African American LURT recipients compared with African American CRT recipients (35.7% vs. 4.5%, P<0.0015) at 1 year. LURT recipients demonstrated a threefold greater rejection risk than CRT recipients who were administered basiliximab (relative risk: 3.6, P<0.002). Graft survival was similar at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The higher rejection rates in LURT recipients (no induction) compared with CRT recipients (basiliximab induction), despite similar chronic immunosuppression (tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids) and immediate graft function, indicate the potential advantage of anti-CD25 induction in LURT protocols to reduce the risk of acute rejection.     

Calcineurin inhibitor- and steroid-free immunosuppression in pancreas-kidney and solitary pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors and steroids are standard immunosuppressants in solid organ transplantation, but (long-term) side effects are harmful to the recipient and the graft. The authors present a novel strategy for posttransplant immunosuppression that combines a depleting antibody with an antimetabolite, avoiding calcineurin inhibitors and steroids. METHODS: In a prospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort study, 75 pancreas-kidney and solitary pancreas recipients received alemtuzumab (4 doses for induction and up to 12 doses within the first year) and mycophenolate mofetil (> or = 2 g/day) for induction and maintenance therapy. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. We compared the results with a historical group of 266 consecutive pancreas recipients on Thymoglobulin (induction) and tacrolimus (maintenance). RESULTS: Differences in patient and graft survival rates between the study and control groups at 6 months were not statistically significant. However, the incidence of a first reversible rejection episode was significantly higher for simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients in the study (vs. control) group. We noted a trend toward higher modification of renal disease levels at 6 months posttransplant in the study (vs. control) groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of alemtuzumab and mycophenolate mofetil was associated with an acceptable rejection rate, a good safety profile, and good (graft and native) kidney function; it eliminated undesired calcineurin inhibitor- and steroid-related side effects. Longer follow-up is warranted before expanded application can be recommended.     

Alemtuzumab induction in deceased donor kidney transplantation

Purpose

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H), a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD52, is a lymphocyte-depleting agent currently being evaluated as an induction agent in solid organ transplantation. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes and effects on peripheral blood lymphocyte subset counts in adult deceased donor renal transplant recipients who received an alemtuzumab-based induction protocol.

Methods

Eleven kidney alone or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients received 20 mg alemtuzumab on postoperative days 0 and 1, followed by calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance immunosuppression after postoperative day 5. We collected 1-year data including recipient and donor demographic features, renal function and adverse events including endocrine impact, incidence of acute rejection episodes, infections or malignancies as well as hematologic and late immunologic parameters for correlation with patient or graft survival.

Results

Mean HLA mismatch was 3.6 and 8/11 deceased donors were of the extended criteria type. Only 2 (18%) recipients displayed delayed graft function with a failure of the serum creatinine to decrease by 25% on the first day; however, their long-term outcomes were similar to other nonaffected patients. Serious adverse events were absent; there was no hyperlipidemia or new-onset diabetes. We failed to observe an acute rejection. The 3 (27%) recipients with infectious complications experienced pericardial tuberculosis, urinary tract infection, or invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Two (18%) cases of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease were diagnosed in this study during the follow-up. Overall patient and graft survival rates were both 91%.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that preconditioning with antibody-depletion using alemtuzumab was efficient with satisfactory patient and graft survivals at 1 year. Alemtuzumab induction was safe even for recipients of extended criteria donor renal transplantation.     

阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗的有效性和安全性

目的 评价阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗的有效性和安全性.方法 将89例肾移植受者随机分为试验组(43例)和对照组(46例).试验组于肾移植术前和术后24 h内分别静脉滴注阿来佐单抗15 mg,对照组不接受免疫诱导治疗.受者术后常规应用环孢素A(或他克莫司)+吗替麦考酚酯+泼尼松预防排斥反应.统计两组术后12月内的移植肾功能、急性排斥反应发生率、感染发生率、移植肾功能延迟恢复发生率、移植肾存活率及淋巴细胞计数,并用ImmuKnowTM免疫细胞功能测定法检测受者CD4+T淋巴细胞的三磷酸腺苷(ATP)值.结果 术后12个月内试验组7.0%(3/43)的受者发生病理证实的急性排斥反应,明显低于对照组的23.9%(11/46,P＜0.05).试验组和对照组总体的感染发生率为别为39.5%(17/43)和30.4%(14/46,P＞0.05),两组机会性感染的发生率分另为23.2%(10/43)和17.4%(8/46,P＞0.05).术后3个月内,试验组淋巴细胞计数低于对照组;术后6个月内,试验组CD4+T淋巴细胞ATP值低于对照组.结论 阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗可维持受者的免疫抑制状态,未见严重不良反应.     

Single shot of alemtuzumab as induction therapy after kidney transplantation is sufficient

In an earlier study, we were able to show that Tac monotherapy following 2 × 20 mg alemtuzumab induction is at least as effective as Tac-based triple-drug immunosuppression in cadaveric renal transplantation. We were interested to learn whether 1 × 30 mg of alemtuzumab is as effective as 2 × 20 mg. Patients of the initial study group (group A) received 20 mg alemtuzumab on days 0 and 2, and tac monotherapy from day 2 on. This group acted as control group for the new arm (group C), where patients were given only 1 × 30 mg alemtuzumab on day 0 followed by Tac monotherapy from day 2 on with the same target levels as in the control group. Frequency of rejection at 6 months was 15% in the control group compared to 6% in the study group and 20% at 12 months in group A versus 6% in group C (P = 0.034). Time to rejection was 4.9 months in group A and 0.8 in group C. One-year patient survival was 98.5% in both groups, graft survival 96.9% in group A, and 98.5% in group C. Safety profile was similar in both groups apart from more viral and bacterial infections in group C. Single shot alemtuzumab induction of 30 mg is as effective as 2 × 20 mg in cadaveric renal transplantation.     

Alemtuzumab (Campath 1H) induction with tacrolimus monotherapy is safe for high immunological risk renal transplantation

Immunosuppression for immunologically high-risk renal transplant patients usually involves antithymocyte globulin induction with triple drug maintenance therapy. Alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 antibody, has shown promise in tolerogenic induction protocols, requiring minimal maintenance immunosuppression. In this prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, we enrolled 21 high immunological risk patients (i.e., panel reactive antibody>20% or previous transplant). Patients received either single-dose alemtuzumab given before graft reperfusion, with tacrolimus monotherapy, or four doses of Thymoglobulin with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. Median follow-up was 377 days. One patient in the Thymoglobulin group who suffered primary graft nonfunction died. One-year cumulative graft survival was 85.7% for the alemtuzumab group and 87.5% for the Thymoglobulin group. Two alemtuzumab and three Thymoglobulin patients suffered rejection episodes. Infection rates were similar. Early results of this ongoing study indicate that a tolerogenic protocol with alemtuzumab induction and tacrolimus maintenance monotherapy is safe in immunologically high-risk renal transplant patients.     

Alemtuzumab with Rapid Steroid Taper in Simultaneous Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation: Comparison to Induction with Antithymocyte Globulin

We compared our experience with alemtuzumab induction and rapid steroid taper (RST) in simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation (SKPT) with a historic control group who received rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) induction with RST. 74 SKPTs performed at our center between January 2005 to November 2008 who underwent immunosuppression with RST in combination with r-ATG induction (n = 33; 1.5 mg/kg × 4 for a total dose of 6 mg/kg) or alemtuzumab induction (n = 41; 30 mg single dose). Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Steroids were discontinued after postoperative day 4. Recipient and transplant characteristics were similar between the 2 groups, with 82% of the r-ATG and 80% of the alemtuzumab group steroid free at 1 year. The rate of clinical acute rejection episodes was 12% in the r-ATG group and 15% in the alemtuzumab group. The rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, BK nephropathy, and graft survival were similar between the 2 groups. There was no difference in mean serum creatinine, calculated GFR, or fasting blood sugar at 1 year between the 2 groups, whereas glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was lower at 1 year in the alemtuzumab (5.3 ± 0.4) versus the r-ATG group (5.6 ± 0.4; P = .0021). Induction with r-ATG or alemtuzumab with RST was safe and effective in SKPT. The incidences of acute rejection episodes, CMV infection, and BK nephropathy were similar. Mean HbA1C at 1 year was lower among the alemtuzumab group. Further long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these results.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundInduction therapy improves graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We aimed to compare the incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) as well as graft and patient outcomes in KTRs who underwent induction with alemtuzumab versus rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG).MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective study involving patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2009 and December 2011 after receiving induction therapy with either alemtuzumab or r-ATG. Maintenance immunosuppression included tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with early steroid withdrawal. Acute rejection was diagnosed using allograft biopsy.ResultsAmong the 108 study patients, 68 received alemtuzumab and 40 got r-ATG. There was a significantly higher incidence of AMR (15% vs 2.5%; P = .008) and similar incidence of ACR (4.4% vs 10%; P = .69) for alemtuzumab versus r-ATG groups. One-year serum creatinine levels (l.68 ± 0.8 mg/dL vs 1.79 ± 1.8 mg/dL; P = .66) as well as graft (91.1 ± 3.5% vs 94.5 ± 3.8%; P = .48) and patient (93.8 ± 3.0% vs 96.4 ± 3.5%; P = .92) survivals were similar for the alemtuzumab versus the r-ATG groups.ConclusionOur study showed a higher incidence of AMR and similar incidence of ACR in KTRs who underwent induction with alemtuzumab compared with those who received r-ATG and were maintained on tacrolimus and MMF. This was despite a lower HLA mismatch in the alemtuzumab group. One-year graft survival, patient survival, and allograft function were similar. Inadequate B-cell suppression by alemtuzumab as well as altered phenotypic and functional properties of repopulating B cells could be contributing to heightened risk of AMR in these patients.     

Comparison of outcomes after delayed graft function: sirolimus-based versus other calcineurin-inhibitor sparing induction immunosuppression regimens

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (SRL) may increase the incidence of or prolong delayed graft function (DGF) after cadaveric renal transplantation. This study compares transplant outcomes of SRL-based induction immunosuppression (IS) with other calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) sparing regimens in the DGF setting. METHODS: Adult cadaveric renal-transplant recipients who received transplants between January 1, 1997 and June 30, 2001 and experienced DGF (n=132) were divided into three groups by induction IS: A, depleting antibody (n=41); B, SRL (n=49); and C, neither (n=42). All recipients also received steroids and mycophenolate mofetil with delayed initiation of CNIs when good renal function returned. Patient survival, graft survival, and time to rejection within 1 year of transplantation were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. One-year graft function was compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The SRL group had longer DGF duration (P=0.01). The three groups had comparable patient (P=0.27) and graft survival (P=0.69), but the depleting antibody group experienced less rejection (P=0.004). There were no clinically significant differences in 1-year graft function. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis of a large and modern cohort of adult cadaveric transplant recipients with DGF, induction immunosuppression with a depleting antibody preparation reduced rejection, whereas SRL prolonged DGF duration. All three CNI-sparing induction IS regimens resulted in comparable patient survival, graft survival, and graft function.     

Corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation recipients

Abstract: Background: Simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation (SLK) has more than doubled since 2002. While less common in kidney transplant alone recipients (KTA), corticosteroid discontinuation is performed routinely in liver transplantation, raising the question of optimal immunosuppression for SLK recipients. Methods: A retrospective case series of 16 SLK recipients under a steroid withdrawal protocol was performed to compare short‐term outcomes to a contemporaneous cohort of 32 KTA recipients. Results: In 69% of SLK recipients, corticosteroids were eliminated compared to 3% of KTA recipients, p < 0.0001. When comparing SLK and KTA recipients one yr post‐transplant, there were no significant differences in renal graft rejection (23.1% vs. 6.3%), death‐censored renal graft survival (100% vs. 97%), estimated glomerular filtration rate (74.4 vs. 62.6 mL/min), serum creatinine (1.10 vs. 1.39 mg/dL), or maintenance immunosuppression, respectively. Conclusions: Corticosteroids may be withdrawn safely in SLK recipients with one‐yr renal outcomes comparable to a KTA cohort.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Comparison With Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction – Long-Term Results

This study compared the effects of using two T-cell depleting antibodies, alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin), as induction immunosuppression for recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation given a prednisone-free maintenance regimen. We used a single-center, nonrandomised, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab (n = 50) or antithymocyte globulin (n = 38) induction in combination with a prednisone-free, tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression protocol. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function, incidence of infectious and malignant complications, and cost considerations. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and antithymocyte globulin. Rejection rates were also nearly equivalent at 1 and 2 years. Viral infectious complications were statistically significantly lower in the alemtuzumab group. The cost of alemtuzumab induction was lower than antithymocyte globulin. Alemtuzumab induction followed by steroid-free maintenance therapy with a tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression regimen provided an effective, safe and cost-conscious approach to SPK transplantation.     

The impact of mycophenolate mofetil dosing patterns on clinical outcome after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has proven to be a very effective drug for the prevention of acute rejection following renal transplantation when dosed as prescribed at 2 or 3 g/d. However, circumstances arise in clinical transplantation where the dose must be lowered, either to avoid drug toxicity or because of concurrent infection. The impact on the incidence of acute rejection and graft survival when the MMF dose must be lowered has not previously been investigated. METHODS: In this study, a cohort of 721 kidney transplant recipients who received immunosuppression using MMF in conjunction with cyclosporine and prednisone and OKT3 (n = 425) or Simulect (n = 296) induction were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared and contrasted between patients with and without MMF dose changes within the first year post-transplantation. RESULTS: The majority of patients (70.3%, n = 507) had at least one dose change within the first post-transplant year. Compared with the 214 patients who did not have a dose change, these patients had a much higher incidence of acute rejection within the first post-transplant year (23.3% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). This resulted in a significantly decreased 3-yr death-censored graft survival (76.3% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.003). The incidence of acute rejection for patients who had a dose change was highest if the dose change occurred within the first post-transplant month (34.4%). The incidence of acute rejection for the dose change patients was influenced by recipient ethnicity (African-American vs. Caucasian) and the type of induction agent used (OKT3 vs. Simulect). CONCLUSION: Altering the dose of MMF within the first post-transplant year correlated with a significantly worse clinical outcome in this cohort of renal transplant recipients. These data suggest that avoidance of MMF dose changes within the first year after renal transplantation would result in improved graft survival.