腹股沟疝无张力修补术42例治疗分析

目的探讨腹股沟疝无张力修补术的手术效果。方法入选的84例腹股沟疝患者均为笔者所在卫生院2009年1月～2011年1月收治的住院患者,全部患者随机分为治疗组（无张力修补术）和对照组（传统修补术）各42例,运用统计学方法对两组的手术指标进行对比分析。结果与对照组比较,治疗组手术时间短,术中出血少,术后下地时间早,住院时间短,并发症发生率及复发率低。结论无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝具手术效果明显优于传统疝修补术,并发症少、复发率低,适合基层医院广泛推广和应用。     

TEP术与无张力疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的效果比较

目的比较完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)与无张力修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的效果。方法收集2017-06—2018-06间在长葛市第二人民医院接受手术治疗的128例老年腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,对其进行回顾性分析。结果 TEP的治疗费用高于无张力修补术(P0.05);但其手术时间、术后疼痛时间、术后恢复时间、住院时间及并发症率均优于无张力修补术。差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论与无张力疝修补术比较,TEP术治疗老年腹股沟疝具有手术时间与住院时间短、术后恢复快、并发症少、复发率低等优点,但是治疗费用较高,应根据患者自身情况与经济能力加以选用。     

疝环充填式无张力疝修补术与传统腹股沟疝修补术疗效比较

摘要：为比较疝环充填式无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术的临床疗效，笔者将79例腹股沟斜疝或直疝患者随机分成2组，I组采用无张力疝修补术，II组行传统疝修补术。结果示I组患者在手术时间、术后疼痛、并发症发生率等均优于II组患者。提示无张力疝修补术较传统疝修补术效果优越，是治疗腹股沟疝的好方法。值得临床推广应用。     

腹股沟疝传统修补术与无张力修补术的临床对比

目的比较腹股沟疝传统修补术与无张力修补术的治疗效果。方法回顾性分析本院2003年1月至2010年12月手术治疗的77例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,随机分为传统修补术组（对照组）和无张力修补术组（观察组）,分析比较两组治疗效果。结果无张力修补术组在并发症、恢复活动时间、住院天数及复发率等疗效指标上明显优于传统修补术组（P〈0.05）。结论无张力疝修补术疗效优于传统疝修补术。     

无张力疝修补术和传统疝修补术在腹股沟疝修补中的疗效与安全性

目的探讨无张力疝修补术和传统疝修补术在腹股沟疝修补中的疗效与安全性。方法将2004-01—2007-12收治的266例腹股沟疝患者按数字表法随机分为2组,141例行无张力修补,125例行传统修补,比较分析2组临床资料。结果无张力疝修补术后疼痛程度、下床活动时间、复发率均明显少于传统疝修补术组(P<0.05)。2组患者住院时间、并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论无张力疝修补术是安全有效的理想术式,具有安全、疼痛轻、下床活动早、术后复发率低等优点。     

传统与无张力腹股沟疝修补术疗效对比

目的探讨无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝中的应用价值及疗效观察。方法共有106例腹股沟疝患者,随机分成传统组和无张力组,比较2组的疗效。结果采用无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝在手术时间、住院时间、以及切口疼痛等方面优于传统腹股沟疝修补术。结论无张力疝修补术可以安全、有效地应用于临床。     

腹腔镜疝修补术与开放无张力疝修补术的对比研究

目的:对比腹腔镜疝修补术与常规开放无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法:回顾分析2005年7月至2010年10月腹腔镜疝修补术及开放式无张力疝修补术的临床资料,其中136例行开放式无张力疝修补术,84例行腹腔镜手术。结果:腹腔镜组术后患者疼痛时间、下床时间、住院时间均优于开放组(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜疝修补术具有患者创伤小、疼痛轻、康复快、切口美观等优点,疗效较开放手术好,为腹股沟疝的治疗提供了更好的选择,尤其适合双侧疝、复发疝。     

腹腔镜疝修补术与传统疝无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝效果比较

目的比较腹腔镜疝修补术与传统无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果。方法随机将100例腹股沟疝患者分为2组,每组50例。传统组行传统无张力疝修补术,腹腔镜组行腹腔镜疝修补术。对2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门恢复排气时间、术后下床活动时间、疼痛持续时间、并发症发生率进行比较。结果腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门恢复排气时间、术后下床活动时间、疼痛持续时间、手术并发症发生率均少于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜疝修补术创伤小、恢复快、安全性高。     

单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外操作与开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术的对比研究

目的比较单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外操作与开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术的临床治疗效果。方法回顾性分析我院2015年1月~2015年6月收治的50例男性单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,年龄18~63岁,中位年龄37岁,所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。患者术前均经超声及临床体格检查,确诊为腹股沟疝。21例行单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝无张力修补术,29例行开放无张力疝修补术治疗,比较两种术式的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症、术后24小时及慢性疼痛(1月以上)、总住院费用等临床疗效。结果单孔腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量、术后平均住院时间及术后24小时疼痛率显著低于开放组,差异有显著性(P0.05);而在总住院费用方面,开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术组显著低于SILS-TEP组,差异有显著性,有统计学意义(P0.05);而二者在慢性疼痛(1月以上)和术后并发症方面没有显著性差异(P0.05)。结论采用单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝无张力修补术的患者术后恢复较好,临床效果明显优于开放性无张力修补术。     

无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝效果观察

目的分析无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果。方法将70例腹股沟疝患者随机分为2组,每组35例。对照组进行传统修疝补术,观察组采取无张力疝修补术。比较2组治疗效果。结果观察组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间均优于对照组,并发症发生率、术后复发率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝,创伤小,并发症发生率低,术后恢复快,复发率低。     

Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND: The optimum method for inguinal hernia repair has not yet been determined. The recurrence rate for non-mesh methods varies between 0.2 and 33 per cent. The value of tension-free repair with prosthetic mesh remains to be confirmed. The aim of this study was to compare mesh and non-mesh suture repair of primary inguinal hernias with respect to clinical outcome, quality of life and cost in a multicentre randomized trial in general hospitals. METHODS: Between September 1993 and January 1996, all patients scheduled for repair of a unilateral primary inguinal hernia were randomized to non-mesh or mesh repair. The patients were followed up at 1 week and at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months. Clinical outcome, quality of life and costs were registered. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were randomized of whom 11 were excluded. Three-year recurrence rates differed significantly: 7 per cent for non-mesh repair (n = 143) and 1 per cent for mesh repair (n = 146) (P = 0.009). There were no differences in clinical variables, quality of life and costs. CONCLUSION: Mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia repair is superior to non-mesh repair with regard to hernia recurrence and is cost-effective. Postoperative complications, pain and quality of life did not differ between groups.     

疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗老年复发性腹股沟疝43例体会

目的探讨疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗老年复发性腹股沟疝的疗效。方法回顾2002年10月至2008年12月用疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗的43例老年复发性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。结果所用患者痊愈出院,术后未应用镇痛药,随访半年至6年无1例复发。结论疝环充填式无张力疝修补术是一种安全可靠的腹股沟疝手术方法,具有创伤小、疼痛轻、恢复快、操作简单、住院时间短、复发率低等优势,特别适于老年复发性腹股沟疝患者。     

无张力疝修补术在老年腹股沟疝患者中应用的临床体会

目的总结善释腹膜前专用网塞在老年腹股沟疝无张力疝修补术中的治疗效果和临床价值。方法采用善释腹膜前专用网塞对210例老年腹股沟疝患者施行无张力疝修补术,观察手术时间、伤口疼痛、术后自主能力的恢复、并发症及复发率。结果 210例手术过程均顺利.术后出现尿潴留2例;阴囊积液1例;伤口持续疼痛2例;伤口区有异物感2例;伤口区积液2例;随访3～30个月,无复发。结论善释腹膜前专用网塞行无张力疝修补术是一种老年腹股沟疝理想的手术方式,具有手术简便,创伤小,无张力,省时,复发率低,并发症少等优点。是疗效确切的无张力疝修补方法。     

Commercial Mesh versus Nylon Mosquito Net for Hernia Repair. A Randomized Double-blind Study in Burkina Faso

Purpose

The goal of this study was to investigate whether locally available Nylon mosquito net might be a useful alternative to expensive commercial mesh implants for hernia repair, a clinical randomized double-blind study was performed.

Materials and Methods

Over a period of 3 months 35 patients with a total of 40 inguinal hernias were randomized for hernia repair with either a commercial graft (Ultrapro^®) or a piece of sterilized 100% Nylon mesh available as mosquito net in most African village markets. The surgeons’ comfort in handling the meshes, the incidence of complications, and the patients’ quality of life before and 30 days after hernia repair were evaluated. In addition, the costs of the two materials were compared.

Results

There was no significant difference in the clinical short-term outcome of the hernia treatment or the surgeons’ comfort in handling the two different materials. The price of the locally bought Nylon mesh was 0.0043 US$ as compared to 108 US$ for the commercial mesh.

Conclusions

In situations where superior results of hernia repair depend on the use of a mesh prosthesis but where commercial material is not available or affordable, the use of Nylon mosquito net may be an alternative. Further studies with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up are justified and recommended.     

Inguinal hernia: obligatory indication for elective surgery?

BACKGROUND: Incarcerated inguinal hernia may be treated effectively by recent surgical techniques with a low rate of complications, but it is unclear whether quality of life is improved by elective inguinal hernia repair. Therefore we investigated the quality of life before and after inguinal hernia repair using plug and patch technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quality of life was prospectively assessed in 123 patients before and 3 months after plug and patch inguinal hernia repair using the Short Form 36 questionaire and a visual analog scale. All patients complained preoperatively of pain associated with the clinical findings of inguinal hernia (visual analog scale: reduced quality of life 6.8+/-2.7; reduced daily activity: 5.5+/-2.6). Clinical characteristics (operation times, in-hospital stay, complications, need for pain medication) were documented. Inclusion criteria were patients with symptomatic inguinal hernia, scheduled for elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair by plug and patch technique. RESULTS: There were no major in-hospital complications. At 3 months no recurrences of inguinal hernia or late onset complications were observed; seven patients complained of dumbness, and eight felt pressure at the operation site with a tendency for resolving pain within this time. At 3 months patients had a significantly improved quality of life regarding freedom from pain, vitality, and physical activity compared to preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Plug and patch repair of unilateral inguinal hernia improves quality of life with a very low rate of procedural complications. Regarding freedom from pain, vitality, and physical activity there is significant improvement as compared to preoperatively. Therefore inguinal hernia repair should be intended in all elective cases and plug and patch repair appears as an excellent technique to improve quality of life.     

Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Almost half the patients who undergo hernia repair with mesh report a feeling of stiffness and a foreign body in the groin. This study evaluated whether patients noticed any difference between lightweight and standard polypropylene mesh for the repair of inguinal hernia. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective repair of unilateral or bilateral, primary or recurrent inguinal hernia by the Lichtenstein technique were randomized to receive either a conventional densely woven polypropylene mesh (100-110 g/m(2)) or a lightweight composite multifilament mesh (polypropylene 27-30 g/m(2)). Quality of life was assessed using Short Form 36 before operation and 6 months after surgery. Pain was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale 2 days and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the feeling of a foreign body in the groin at 6 months. RESULTS: Some 122 hernias were randomized; 117 were included in the analysis of perioperative data, and 106 were re-examined after 6 months. There were no differences between the treatment groups with respect to early and late surgical complications. Use of lightweight mesh was associated with significantly less pain on exercise after 6 months (P = 0.042). In addition, fewer patients reported the feeling of a foreign body after repair with lightweight mesh (17.2 versus 43.8 per cent with conventional mesh; P = 0.003). Quality of life was improved significantly at 6 months compared with the preoperative assessment, and there were no differences between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Lightweight polypropylene mesh may be preferable for Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up are needed before it can be recommended for routine use.     

Comparative study of tailor-made mesh plug herniorrhaphy versus Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy versus Bassini operation: a prospective clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: Operations to cure inguinal hernia are among the most common surgical procedures. However, the most effective surgical technique for inguinal hernia repair is unknown, and the recurrence at 5 years varies between 1% and 10%. Surgical techniques and implanted materials are crucial to the result of and costs associated with hernia repair. The objective of this study was to determine whether the tailor-made mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair was as effective and safe as other methods of herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Of 94 patients who had a primary diagnosis of inguinal hernia prospectively included in the study, 25 were treated with tailor-made mesh plug herniorrhaphy, 26 with Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy and 36 with the Bassini operation. The primary outcome was the recurrence of hernia at 1 year, and secondary outcomes included surgical complications and hospital stay. RESULTS: There was no postoperative mortality in this study. Three patients had recurrence after Bassini operation, but there was no recurrent hernia after Lichtenstein or mesh plug herniorrhaphy. Groin swelling and ecchymosis were found in two patients (1 tailor-made mesh plug, 1 Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy). No surgical site infection occurred. Mean operating time was 60 minutes (range, 45-75 minutes) for tailor-made mesh plug herniorrhaphy, 82 minutes (range, 30-120 minutes) for Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy, and 82 minutes (range, 30-135 minutes) for the Bassini operation. CONCLUSION: Tailor-made mesh plug herniorrhaphy is a safe operation. The mesh plug material (Mersilene) was cheap. The recurrence rate was lower with tailor-made mesh plug herniorrhaphy than with the Bassini operation, but equal to that with Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy. Postoperative complications did not differ among all operations.     

Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus non-mesh primary inguinal hernia repair: long-term chronic pain at 10 years

BACKGROUND: Open mesh or non-mesh inguinal hernia repair may influence the incidence of chronic postoperative pain differently. METHODS: A total of 300 patients scheduled for repair of a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to non-mesh or mesh repair. The primary outcome measure was clinical outcome including persistent pain and discomfort interfering with daily activity. Long-term results at 3 years of follow-up have been published. Included here are 10-year follow-up results with respect to pain. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients, 87 patients (30%) died and 49 patients (17%) were lost to follow-up. A total of 153 were physically examined in the outpatient clinic after a median long-term follow-up of 129 months (range, 109 to 148 months). None of the patients in the non-mesh or mesh group suffered from persistent pain and discomfort interfering with daily activity. CONCLUSIONS: Our 10-year follow-up study provides evidence that mesh repair of inguinal hernia is equal to non-mesh repair with respect to long-term persistent pain and discomfort interfering with daily activity. An important new finding from the patient's perspective is that chronic postoperative pain seems to dissipate over time.     

应用轻量网塞治疗老年腹股沟疝96例的临床体会

目的探讨善释轻量网塞无张力修补术对老年腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法采用北京天助畅运公司生产的善释轻量网塞作为修补材料,自2006年1月至2009年1月在局部浸润麻醉下对96例老年腹股沟疝患者施行无张力疝修补,并进行回顾性分析。结果本组手术全部成功,术后并发症发生率2%(2/96),平均住院时间2.2 d,随访3～24个月,无复发病例。结论应用善释轻量网塞治疗老年腹股沟疝安全可靠、操作简便、损伤轻、恢复快,适合老年腹股沟疝患者。     

Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of single versus double mesh laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair

The aim of this study was to compare the double and the single mesh techniques, both used in the laparoscopic totally extra peritoneal (TEP) repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. Sixty-five patients with bilateral inguinal hernia were enrolled in a prospective, randomized trial comparing the single and the double mesh techniques. The single and the double mesh techniques compared favorably in terms of operating time, long-term morbidity, hospital stay, time for return to work, postoperative quality of life and recurrence rate. However, the cost of a single, large prosthesis was 38% to 40% lower than that of 2 small ones. The laparoscopic TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia with a large, single prosthetic mesh is a technically simple and safe procedure, which offers clear cost savings and a potentially shorter operating time over the double mesh repair. It is strongly recommended for the routine, laparoscopic TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernias.