Comparison of domperidone, droperidol, and metoclopramide in the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting after balanced general anesthesia

Women (185) undergoing elective orthopedic surgery under balanced general anesthesia were given 5 or 10 mg of domperidone, 1.25 mg of droperidol, 10 mg of metoclopramide, or a saline placebo intravenously in a double-blind random fashion 5 minutes before the end of anesthesia to prevent postoperative vomiting. Administration of the same antiemetic was repeated intramuscularly during the first 24 hours postoperatively if the patient complained of nausea or retched or vomited. Sigificantly (p less than 0.05 to p less than 0.001), fewer of the patients given droperidol were nauseated (25%) or vomited (17%) in comparison with patients given saline (incidence of nausea was 55% and vomiting 40%). Incidences of nausea and vomiting were similar in patients given domperidone, metoclopramide, or saline. Furthermore, 39 to 45% of the patients given domperidone, metoclopramide, or saline needed additional doses of the same drug, whereas only 22% of the patient given droperidol required a second dose. It is concluded that droperidol is effective in the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting after balanced general anesthesia but that domperidone or metoclopramide are not.     

Effect of a Small Dose of Droperidol on Nausea, Vomiting and Recovery after Outpatient Enflurane Anaesthesia

Young, healthy outpatients (100) undergoing restorative dentistry and/or oral surgery under enfluranenitrous oxide-oxygen anaesthesia were given 0.014 mg/kg of droperidol or a saline placebo i.v. in a double-blind random fashion 5 min after induction of anaesthesia to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Overall, less patients given droperidol were nauseated (18%) or vomited (7%) in comparison with patients given saline (27% and 11%, respectively). During the first postoperative hour, 4% of patients given droperidol were nauseated and 2% vomited, whereas 16% of patients given saline were nauseated and 6% vomited. Four patients given saline were not discharged from the clinic 1 h after anaesthesia owing to prolonged nausea and vomiting. The time elapsed until the patients were oriented as to time and place after cessation of enflurane and nitrous oxide administration was similar in both groups (mean +/- s.d., 13.5 +/- 4.7 min). Thirty minutes after anaesthesia, the ability to walk on a straight line was significantly (P less than 0.001) worse in patients given droperidol as compared to patients given saline. After 60 min, only one patient given droperidol and four patients who received saline and vomited took side steps or were unable to walk. Psychomotor performance was significantly (P less than 0.05) better in a perceptual speed test both 30 and 60 min after anaesthesia in patients receiving saline as compared to those given droperidol. It is concluded that although droperidol is a less effective antiemetic after outpatient than after inpatient enflurane anaesthesia, small doses of droperidol may be used for outpatients prone to vomiting to prevent delayed discharge from the clinic due to prolonged vomiting.     

Droperidol, alizapride and metoclopramide in the prevention and treatment of post-operative emetic sequelae

Women (182) undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia received 100 or 200 mg alizapride, 1.25 mg droperidol, 20 mg metoclopramide or a saline placebo intravenously 5-10 min before the end of anaesthesia in a double-blind random fashion to prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting. Administration of the same anti-emetic was repeated during 24 h post-operatively if the patient complained of nausea or retched or vomited. Significantly fewer patients given any of the anti-emetics prophylactically were nauseated or vomited in comparison with patients given saline. The incidence of nausea and vomiting in the saline group was 83%, while in those patients who received an anti-emetic it was as follows: droperidol 35% (P less than 0.001 vs. saline), alizapride, 100 mg 46% (P less than 0.01), alizapride 200 mg 53% (P less than 0.05) and metoclopramide 58% (P less than 0.05). The number of patients needing an additional dose of the same substance in the post-operative period was significantly higher in the saline group (67%) than in the groups which had received droperidol (32%, P less than 0.01) and alizapride 100 mg (37%, P less than 0.05) or 200 mg (33%, P less than 0.05). The patients who received metoclopramide, however, did not differ statistically from the saline group in the treatment of nausea and vomiting. It is concluded that droperidol was the most effective, and metoclopramide the least effective, anti-emetic in this study.     

Ondansetron versus droperidol or placebo to prevent nausea and vomiting after otologic surgery

This study compares the preoperative administration of ondansetron with that of droperidol or saline solution for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in otologic surgery patients. A total of 120 otherwise healthy individuals were randomly assigned to receive either saline solution, ondansetron (4 mg intravenously), or droperidol (25 μg/kg intravenously) before anesthetic induction. Intraoperative and postanesthesia care unit times were recorded along with incidence of nausea, vomiting, pain, nausea and recovery scores, and the administration of rescue antiemetics. Similar assessments were made during the next 24 hours. Demographics were similar, but more males received ondansetron. Anesthetic recovery scores were lower after administration of droperidol than after ondansetron. Incidence of nausea was similar between groups, but severity was greater with placebo and droperidol than with ondansetron. More vomiting occurred with placebo than with ondansetron or droperidol. No intergroup differences in rescue antiemetic administration were noted, however. Twenty-four hours later, more patients receiving placebo had nausea or vomited than patients receiving droperidol or ondansetron. Fewer women in the ondansetron group vomited than in the other two groups. Ondansetron 4 mg intravenously is as effective as droperidol and better than saline solution in preventing nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing otologic surgery. No cost advantage as determined by lower use of rescue antiemetics or shorter postanesthesia care unit times was noted after ondansetron therapy. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:785-9.)     

Oral ondansetron,tropisetron or metoclopramide to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting: a comparison in high-risk patients undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery

BACKGROUND: Oral antiemetic prophylaxis may be a practical alternative to intravenous administration. Intravenous ondansetron and tropisetron prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) at least as efficiently as traditional antiemetics, droperidol and metoclopramide. We tested the hypothesis that the incidence of PONV after oral ondansetron or tropisetron prophylaxis is lower compared with metoclopramide among high-risk patients. METHODS: In a prospective, double-blind study we studied 179 high-risk patients who received either ondansetron 16 mg, tropisetron 5 mg, or metoclopramide 10 mg orally 1 h before the operation. A standard general anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used. The incidence of PONV and the need for rescue antiemetic medication was recorded for 24 h. RESULTS: In the postanesthesia care unit, the incidence of PONV was lower after premedication with tropisetron compared with ondansetron and metoclopramide (15%, 32% and 39%, respectively). The incidence of PONV during 0-24 h was the same in each group (68%, 58% and 75% in the ondansetron, tropisetron and metoclopramide group, respectively), but the incidence of vomiting was significantly lower after ondansetron (34%) and tropisetron (22%) prophylaxis compared with metoclopramide (53%). The need for additional antiemetics was significantly lower after tropisetron prophylaxis compared with metoclopramide. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher after tropisetron than after metoclopramide. CONCLUSIONS: In the initial period, the incidence of PONV was lower after premedication with oral tropisetron than after ondansetron or metoclopramide. Considering the entire 24-h postoperative period, the incidence of PONV was the same after all three premedications, but the incidence of vomiting was lower after oral ondansetron and tropisetron than after metoclopramide.     

COMPARISON OF THE USE OF DOMPERIDONE, DROPERIDOL AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING FOLLOWING GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY IN DAY CASES

The efficacy of domperidone 20 mg, droperidol 2.5 mg, metoclopramide10 mg or placebo (saline) administered i.v. before inductionof anaesthesia, was studied in 199 women undergoing gynaecologicalsurgery as day cases. Following a standardized general anaesthetictechnique, droperidol or metoclopramide significantly reducedthe incidence of nausea and vomiting; domperidone decreasedthe incidence of postoperative nausea alone. The occurrenceof extrapyramidal reactions was similar in all groups. Patientstreated with antiemetics were no more sedated than those givenplacebo. Those receiving droperidol complained of significantlyless postoperative pain than those who had received domperidoneor metoclopramide.     

A double-blinded comparison of metoclopramide and droperidol for prevention of emesis following strabismus surgery.

Vomiting in the postoperative period is common in children after strabismus surgery. One hundred ten pediatric patients, ages 8 months to 14 yr, admitted for outpatient strabismus surgery were enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded study to compare droperidol and metoclopramide to placebo for the prevention of postoperative emesis. Each child was prospectively assigned at random to one of four treatment groups: metoclopramide 0.15 mg/kg, metoclopramide 0.25 mg/kg, droperidol 0.075 mg/kg, or saline control. Drugs were administered intravenously immediately after induction of inhalation anesthesia. No neuromuscular blocking agents were used. Tracheal extubation was performed while patients were still deeply anesthetized. Acetaminophen and meperidine were given in standard doses for postoperative pain to all children. The incidence of vomiting was less in both the droperidol (33%) and metoclopramide 0.25 mg/kg (29%) groups when compared to controls (88%) (P less than 0.01). Patients receiving metoclopramide 0.15 mg/kg had a 68% incidence of vomiting (P not significant). The mean frequency of emesis was reduced in all treatment groups compared with control (P less than 0.05). Patients receiving droperidol and metoclopramide 0.25 mg/kg also had decreased postoperative stays (metoclopramide 201 min; droperidol 213 min) versus control (258 min, P less than 0.05). No child exhibited extrapyramidal symptoms, excessive drowsiness, or agitation. We conclude that metoclopramide in a dose of 0.25 mg/kg, administered prior to the start of surgery, is at least as effective as droperidol in preventing postoperative emesis and can reduce the time to patient discharge compared to control.     

COMPARISON OF THE USE OF DOMPERIDONE, DROPERIDOL AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING FOLLOWING MAJOR GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY

Domperidone 20 mg, droperidol 2.5 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg andplacebo (saline) were given i.v. 10 min before the end of anaesthesia,to 200 women undergoing major gynaecological surgery, and theincidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting following a standardanaesthetic technique was assessed. Droperidol was significantlymore effective than domperidone, metoclopramide or placebo inreducing emetic sequelae. There were no significant differencesbetween the groups in the incidence of extrapyramidal effectsand postoperative sedation. Patients given droperidol requiredless postoperative analgesia than those given domperidone ormetoclopramide. It was concluded that, of the drugs studied,droperidol alone was effective in protecting against nauseaand vomiting after major gynaecological surgery.     

Efficacy and adverse effects of prophylactic antiemetics during patient-controlled analgesia therapy: a quantitative systematic review.

Nausea and vomiting are frequent adverse effects of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids. To identify the optimal prophylactic antiemetic intervention in this setting, we performed a systematic search for randomized trials (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, reference lists, hand-searching, no language restriction) published up to May 1998 that compared prophylactic antiemetic interventions with placebo or no treatment in the postoperative PCA-setting with opioids. Fourteen placebo-controlled trials (1117 patients) with different regimens of droperidol, ondansetron, hyoscine TTS, tropisetron, metoclopramide, propofol, and promethazine were analyzed. One PCA was with tramadol, all others were with morphine. At 24 h, the cumulative incidence of nausea and vomiting without antiemetics was approximately 50%. Droperidol 0.017-0.17 mg/mg of morphine (0.5-11 mg/d droperidol) was statistically significantly more effective than placebo without evidence of dose-responsiveness; the number needed to treat to prevent nausea compared with placebo was 2.7 (95% confidence interval 1.8-5.2), and that to prevent vomiting was 3.1 (2.3-4.8). Compared with placebo, the incidence of minor adverse effects with droperidol was increased with doses >4 mg/d. IMPLICATIONS: Of 100 patients treated with droperidol added in a patient-controlled analgesia pump with morphine, 30 who would have vomited or been nauseated had they not received droperidol will not suffer these effects. There is no evidence of dose-responsiveness for efficacy with droperidol, but the risk of adverse effects is dose-dependent. There is a lack of evidence for other antiemetics.     

Low-dose droperidol versus standard-dose droperidol for prevention of postoperative vomiting after pediatric strabismus surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a low dose of droperidol is as effective as a high dose in preventing vomiting after pediatric strabismus surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Operating room and recovery room at a university medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred children undergoing strabismus procedures. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided randomly into three groups and received either droperidol 75 microgram/kg, droperidol 20 microgram/kg, or saline. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Vomiting was assessed in all groups, as was time to discharge and ability to perform a satisfactory postoperative eye examination. Children who received droperidol vomited less frequently than those who did not (p = 0.0521). There was no difference in the frequency of vomiting between the two groups that received droperidol. CONCLUSION: Droperidol 20 microgram/kg is as effective as droperidol 75 microgram/kg in preventing vomiting after pediatric strabismus surgery. Because higher doses of droperidol may sedate some patients, the lowest effective dose should be used. In this study, however, there was no statistically significant difference with regard to length of recovery room stay.     

Prophylactic anti-emetic therapy with granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide in female patients undergoing middle ear surgery

The efficacy of granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in female patients undergoing middle ear surgery was compared. In a randomised, double-blind study, 180 patients received granisetron 40 micrograms.kg-1, droperidol 20 micrograms.kg-1 or metoclopramide 0.2 mg.kg-1 given intravenously immediately before induction of anaesthesia (n = 60 for each). A standardised general anaesthetic technique was employed throughout. A complete response, defined as no postoperative nausea and vomiting and no need for another rescue anti-emetic, during the first 3 h after anaesthesia was achieved in 83%, 58% and 55% of patients who had received granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide, respectively. The corresponding incidence during the next 21 h after anaesthesia was 85%, 54% and 47% (p < 0.05). No clinically important adverse effects were observed in any of the groups. We conclude that prophylactic therapy with granisetron is superior to droperidol or metoclopramide in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after middle ear surgery.     

Metoclopramide reduces the incidence of vomiting following strabismus surgery in children

This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of metoclopramide administered at the completion of surgery as an antiemetic agent in pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory strabismus surgery; 126 unpremedicated ASA Physical Status 1 and 2 children ranging in age from 2 to 18 yr served as subjects. All received general anesthesia with halothane, N2O, and O2; tracheal intubation was facilitated with intravenous (iv) atracurium 0.5 mg/kg. Intravenous atropine 0.02 mg/kg and lactated Ringer's solution with 5% dextrose equivalent to 4 h of maintenance fluids were administered during surgery. Neither opioids nor droperidol were given intraoperatively. At the completion of surgery, residual muscle paralysis was reversed with atropine 0.02 mg/kg (maximum dose 1.0 mg) and neostigmine 0.07 mg/kg (maximum dose 5.0 mg), and the stomach was decompressed prior to tracheal extubation. After the patient had been transferred to the postanesthesia recovery room (PARR) either metoclopramide 0.15 mg/kg or normal saline was administered intravenously to the children over a 1-min period. A research associate monitored the children for the incidence of post-operative vomiting and the time required for each child to meet discharge criteria from Short Stay Recovery Unit (SSRU). If a child vomited more than three times in both the PARR and SSRU, the vomiting was construed to be severe and the patient was offered further antiemetic treatment with iv droperidol 70 micrograms/kg. The incidence of postoperative vomiting in the metoclopramide group was 37% versus 59% in the placebo group (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Superior prolonged antiemetic prophylaxis with a four-drug multimodal regimen - comparison with propofol or placebo

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a low-dose propofol infusion with a four-drug multimodal regimen for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: : PONV was studied in two patient groups with a known high incidence. Through a stratified randomization, 60 patients undergoing breast surgery and 120 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomized to three groups of equal size: the propofol group (P), the multidrug group (M) and the control group (C). All patients received general anesthesia, induction with propofol and maintenance with sevoflurane. After induction, patients in the P group received a continuous infusion of propofol 1 mg/kg/h during the operation and the first 4 postoperative h. Patients in the M group received dexamethasone 4 mg and three antiemetics, ondansetron 4 mg, droperidol 1.25 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg i.v. In the control group no prophylaxis was given. Nausea and pain were evaluated by incidence and a visual analog scale (0-10 cm). All emetic episodes were noted by the staff during the first 4 h and by the patients during the next 20 h. RESULTS: The overall incidence of PONV during the first 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the M group (24%) than in the P group (49%) (P<0.01) or the C group (70%) (P<0.001). The incidence of PONV increased significantly both in patients undergoing breast surgery and abdominal surgery after termination of propofol. The number of patients who vomited was significantly lower in the M group, both in breast surgery patients (5%) and abdominal surgery patients (3%) compared to patients in the propofol groups (breast 16% NS; abdominal 29%, P<0.05) and in the control groups (breast 37%, P<0.01; abdominal 29%, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The incidence of PONV is very high in patients undergoing breast and abdominal surgery. In the present study antiemetic prophylaxis with a combination of droperidol, ondansetron, metoclopramide and dexamethasone was more effective in preventing PONV, especially vomiting, than a postoperative low-dose infusion of propofol, which had a short lasting effect.     

Droperidol versus metoclopramide. Prevention of emesis following strabismus surgery in children]

Vomiting after strabismus surgery is a major problem that remains as yet unsolved, especially in children. Droperidol and metoclopramide, both known as powerful antiemetic drugs, were compared in this study. METHODS. One hundred ASA class I and II children ranging from 3 to 10 years of age were studied in a double-blind, randomised fashion. They were assigned to three groups: group D (n = 33) received 0.075 mg/kg droperidol, group M (n = 33) 0.15 mg/kg metoclopramide, and group N (n = 34) 0.1 ml/kg NaCl i.v. upon arrival in the post-anaesthesia recovery room (PARR). After oral premedication with 0.4 mg/kg midazolam, anaesthesia was induced via a face mask by inhalation of halothane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen. Barbiturates, atropine, and succinylcholine were not used; 0.05 mg/kg vecuronium was given to facilitate intubation. Gastric contents were aspirated by a gastric tube at the end of the operation. Vomiting and retching were recorded for 24 h; recovery from anaesthesia was assessed by a modified Steward score. RESULTS. The three groups were comparable regarding age, body weight, duration of anaesthesia, number of repaired eye muscles, and occurrence of the oculocardiac reflex (OCR). During the first 24 h postoperatively 21/33 (64%) patients of group D vomited, 24/33 (73%) of group M, and 33/34 (97%) of group N. The differences between groups D and N and between M and N were significant (P less than 0.01); comparison of groups D and M showed no statistical significance. Droperidol was more effective in reducing severe vomiting. Of the group N children, 47% vomited more than 6 times in 24 h compared to 18% of group M and 0% of group D. Age, sex, duration of anaesthesia, number of repaired eye muscles, and occurrence of the OCR had no influence on postoperative vomiting. Despite being administered at the end of the operation, droperidol did not prolong the patients' stay in the PARR. The post-anaesthetic scores for group D children were only slightly lower compared to groups M and N. CONCLUSIONS. Droperidol (0.075 mg/kg) and metoclopramide (0.15 mg/kg) both reduce postoperative vomiting after strabismus surgery. Droperidol seems to be more effective in reducing severe vomiting. Postoperative sedation after droperidol was not a major problem in our experience.     

Antiemetic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: comparison of metoclopramide and ondansetron

We have compared the effectiveness of ondansetron (115 patients) and metoclopramide (101 patients) for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass. In a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study, patients received oral ondansetron 16 mg or oral metoclopramide 10 mg, 1-2 h before surgery. Anaesthesia was not standardized. Assessments of the severity of nausea and occurrence of vomiting were made at intervals after extubation and until discharge from the intensive care, or for a total of 24 h. Compared with the metoclopramide group, the ondansetron group had a higher incidence of nausea (49.6% vs 33.7%; P < 0.05) and vomiting (42.6% vs 24.8%; P < 0.01). There was no difference between groups in the number of patients who accepted postoperative antiemetics (ondansetron 43.4% vs metoclopramide 32.6%) and there was no difference in the incidence of symptoms of moderate or severe nausea.      

Comparative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting are important causes of morbidity after anesthesia and surgery. We performed a meta-analysis of published, randomized, controlled trials to determine the relative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. We performed a literature search of English references using both the MEDLINE database and a manual search. Double-blinded, randomized, controlled trials comparing the efficiency of the prophylactic administration of ondansetron, droperidol, and/or metoclopramide therapy during general anesthesia were included. A total of 58 studies were identified, of which 4 were excluded for methodological concerns. For each comparison of drugs, a pooled odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI was calculated using a random effects model. Ondansetron (pooled OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31, 0.61; P < 0.001) and droperidol (pooled OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54, 0.85; P < 0.001) were more effective than metoclopramide in preventing vomiting. Ondansetron was more effective than droperidol in preventing vomiting in children (pooled OR 0.49; P = 0.004), but they were equally effective in adults (pooled OR 0.87; P = 0.45). The overall risk of adverse effects was not different among drug combinations. We conclude that ondansetron and droperidol are more effective than metoclopramide in reducing postoperative vomiting. IMPLICATIONS: We performed a systematic review of published, randomized, controlled trials to determine the relative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Ondansetron and droperidol were more effective than metoclopramide in reducing postoperative vomiting. The overall risk of adverse effects did not differ.     

5-HT3 receptor antagonistsvs traditional agents for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting

PURPOSE: Numerous antiemetics have been studied for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) including traditional agents (metoclopramide, perphenazine, prochlorperazine, cyclizine and droperidol) and the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (ondansetron, dolasetron, granisetron and tropisetron). The results have been divergent and inconsistent. The purpose of this quantitative systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of 5HT3 receptor antagonists compared to traditional antiemetics for the prevention of PONV METHODS: A systematic search of the English language literature using computerized MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Pre-MEDLINE databases from 1966 to October 1999 and a manual search of references from retrieved articles were performed. Individual efficacy and adverse effect data was extracted from each of the studies according to a predefined protocol. The summary odds ratios were calculated using the Dersimonian and Laird method under a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 41 trials met our pre-defined inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. Results in the 32 studies examining PONV indicated a 46% reduction in the odds of PONV in the 5-HT3-treated group (0.54 [95% CI 0.42-0.71], P < 0.001). Evaluation of PONV by traditional antiemetic agent demonstrated a 39% reduction compared with droperidol (0.61 [95% CI 0.42-0.89], P < 0.001) and a 56% reduction compared with metoclopramide (0.44 [95% CI 0.31-0.62], P < 0.001). Results in the 34 studies examining vomiting indicated a 38% reduction in the odds of vomiting in the 5-HT3-treated group (0.62 [95% CI 0.48-0.81], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are superior to traditional antiemetic agents for the prevention of PONV and vomiting. The reduction in the odds of PONV and vomiting is significant in the overall analysis and the subgroup analyses comparing 5-HT3 receptor antagonists with droperidol and metoclopramide.     

Prevention of nausea and vomiting with granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background: Nausea and vomiting during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section are distressing to the patient. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in parturients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 120 patients received granisetron 3 mg, droperidol 1.25 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg or placebo (saline) ( n =30 of each) i. v. immediately after clamping of the foetal umbilical cord. Nausea, vomiting and safety assessments were performed during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
Results: The incidence of intraoperative, post-delivery nausea and vomiting was 13%, 17%, 20% and 63% after administration of granisetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo, respectively; the corresponding incidence during 0–3 h after surgery was 7%, 27%, 27% and 43%; the corresponding incidence during 3–24 h after surgery was 7%, 20%, 23% and 37% ( P <0.05; overall Fisher's exact probability test). No clinically important adverse events were observed in any of the groups.
Conclusion: Granisetron is highly effective for preventing nausea and vomiting during and after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Droperidol and metoclopramide are effective for the prevention of intraoperative, post-delivery emesis, but are ineffective for the reduction of the incidence of postoperative emesis.     

Prevention of nausea and vomiting in female patients undergoing breast surgery: A comparison with granisetron, droperidol, metoclopramide and placebo

Background : Breast surgery is associated with a relatively high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide for preventing PONV after breast surgery.
Methods : In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 120 female patients received granisetron 40μg.kg^-1, droperidol 1.25 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg or placebo (saline) (n=30 for each) intravenously immediately before the induction of anaesthesia. A standard general anaesthetic technique was employed throughout. Postoperatively, during the first 24 h after anaesthesia, the incidence of PONV and adverse events was recorded.
Results : The incidence of PONV was 17% with granisetron, 37% with droperidol, 43% with metoclopramide and 50% with placebo ( P <0.05; overall Fisher's exact probability test). The incidence of adverse events was not different among the groups.
Conclusion : Granisetron is highly effective for reducing the incidence of PONV in female patients undergoing breast surgery. Droperidol and metoclopramide are ineffective in this population.     

Postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery: efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron and droperidol in a randomized placebo-controlled study

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common adverse phenomenon following breast surgery. The efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol in preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing breast surgery was compared in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Altogether 207 women were randomly assigned to receive either a single intravenous dose of droperidol (1.25 mg) (n = 69), ondansetron (8 mg) (n = 67) or saline (n = 71) immediately after induction of general anaesthesia with thiopental, fentanyl, atracurium, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Complaints of nausea, vomiting and requests for rescue antiemetics were recorded during a 24-h period postoperatively. During the initial 2 h in the postanaesthesia care unit, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 15%, 6% and 12% in the placebo, droperidol and ondansetron groups, respectively (NS). The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting during the first 24 h was 61%, 48% and 45% in the placebo, droperidol and ondansetron treatment groups, respectively (NS). Postoperative analgesic requirements and the length of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit were equal in all three treatment groups. It is concluded that the intravenous pretreatment with single doses of ondansetron or droperidol did not substantially prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery.