Quantitative Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Spinal Osteoporosis Following Spinal Cord Injury

Disuse osteoporosis occurs in the lower extremities of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, spinal osteoporosis is not usually observed in these patients. We investigated lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in SCI patients using single energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Our study population consisted of 64 patients with long-standing SCI. Spine BMD (g/cm³) was assessed by QCT at four vertebrae ranging from T11 to L4 with single midvertebral CT slices 1 cm thick parallel to the vertebral end-plates. Confounding variables affecting normal trabecular bone pattern, such as compression fractures, surgical hardware or fat replacement, were excluded. For a subset of 29 patients, DXA values of the spine and femoral neck were also measured, and QCT and DXA Z-scores were compared On the average, the 64 SCI patients had Z-scores 2.0 ± 1.2 below those of age-matched controls. In the subset of 29 patients with both QCT and DXA measurements, the QCT and DXA Z-scores were 2.4 ± 1.1 below and 1.3 ± 2.3 above the mean, respectively (p<0.0001). Our results indicate that QCT reveals osteoporosis of the spine after SCI, in contrast to DXA. We postulate that QCT is more valuable for evaluating spinal osteoporosis following SCI than DXA and thus recommend QCT for spinal BMD studies in SCI. Received: 20 December 1999 / Accepted: 17 April 2000     

Interpreting the DXA analysis: When should you hold off on spinal fusion?

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) and is used for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring the effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment. Its results are predictive of both vertebral compression fractures and vertebral screw pullout strength. Though low BMD and the presence of osteoporosis are associated with failure of spinal instrumentation and junctional kyphosis, DXA scans are not universally obtained prior to spinal fusions, and there exists no consensus on T-score thresholds for determining if spinal fusions are a reasonable option in patients with diminished bone quality.     

磁共振扩散加权成像表观扩散系数、信号强度比对腰椎骨质疏松的定量评价

目的:探讨磁共振扩散加权成像(diffusion weighted imaging,DWI)表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC),信号强度比(signal intensity ratio,SIR)在腰椎骨质疏松定量评价中的应用价值。方法:选取2017年5月至2019年10月接受双能X线吸收(dualenergy X ray absorption,DXA)骨密度(bone mineral density,BMD),腰椎常规MRI扫描和DWI扫描检查的腰椎疾病患者175例。根据DXA骨密度T值分为骨质疏松组(64例)、骨量减少组(53例)、骨量正常组(58例)。测量比较3组腰椎L_2-L_4的ADC、SIR值;分析ADC、SIR值与BMD的相关性;采用受试者工作特征(receiver operator characteristic,ROC)曲线分析ADC,SIR值对腰椎骨质疏松与骨量减少,腰椎骨质疏松与骨量正常及腰椎骨质疏松的鉴别诊断价值。结果:3组ADC、SIR值比较差异均有统计学意义(F=41.386、37.114,均P=0.000);骨质疏松组ADC值低于骨量减少组、骨量正常组(t=3.540、9.069,P=0.001、0.000);骨质疏松组SIR值高于骨量减少组、骨量正常组(t=5.083、8.523,均P=0.000)。Spearman相关性分析显示:ADC值与BMD呈正相关(r=0.313,P=0.004);SIR值与BMD呈负相关(r=-0.589,P=0.000)。ROC曲线分析显示:ADC、SIR诊断腰椎骨质疏松骨量减少的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC),敏感度,特异度分别为0.742,89.1%,52.8%和0.729,89.1%,50.9%(均P=0.000);ADC、SIR诊断腰椎骨质疏松骨量正常的AUC,敏感度,特异度分别为0.815,100.0%,50.0%和0.856,65.6%,93.1%(均P=0.000);ADC、SIR诊断腰椎骨质疏松的AUC,敏感度,特异度分别为0.78,89.1%,51.4%和0.795,50.0%,94.6%(均P=0.000);均有一定诊断价值。结论:ADC、SIR能够较好地反映腰椎疾病患者BMD情况,可对骨质疏松的椎体进行定量评价,二者水平对腰椎骨质疏松具有重要的辅助诊断作用。     

Current role for bone absorptiometry

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a key contributor to the management of bone fragility syndromes, most notably postmenopausal osteoporosis. Experimental studies of bone biomechanics have established that an accurate marker for mechanical strength is areal BMD (aBMD, g/cm²). Areal BMD contributes 70% of mechanical strength at the femur and 40% at the spine. Two decades after the T-score was first introduced (World Health Organization, 1994), changes have occurred in the indications of DXA and in the interpretation of its results for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of osteoporosis.     

Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: Bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of lumbar spine attenuation measurement for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment at screening computed tomographic colonography (CTC) using central dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference standard. Two‐hundred and fifty‐two adults (240 women and 12 men; mean age 58.9 years) underwent CTC screening and central DXA BMD measurement within 2 months (mean interval 25.0 days). The lowest DXA T‐score between the spine and hip served as the reference standard, with low BMD defined per World Health Organization as osteoporosis (DXA T‐score ≤ ?2.5) or osteopenia (DXA T‐score between ?1.0 and ?2.4). Both phantomless quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and simple nonangled region‐of‐interest (ROI) multi‐detector CT (MDCT) attenuation measurements were applied to the T₁₂–L₅ levels. The ability to predict osteoporosis and low BMD (osteoporosis or osteopenia) by DXA was assessed. A BMD cut‐off of 90 mg/mL at phantomless QCT yielded 100% sensitivity for osteoporosis (29 of 29) and a specificity of 63.8% (143 of 224); 87.2% (96 of 110) below this threshold had low BMD and 49.6% (69 of 139) above this threshold had normal BMD at DXA. At L₁, a trabecular ROI attenuation cut‐off of 160 HU was 100% sensitive for osteoporosis (29 of 29), with a specificity of 46.4% (104 of 224); 83.9% (125 of 149) below this threshold had low BMD and 57.5% (59/103) above had normal BMD at DXA. ROI performance was similar at all individual T₁₂–L₅ levels. At ROC analysis, AUC for osteoporosis was 0.888 for phantomless QCT [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.780–0.946] and ranged from 0.825 to 0.853 using trabecular ROIs at single lumbar levels (0.864; 95% CI 0.752–0.930 at multivariate analysis). Supine‐prone reproducibility was better with the simple ROI method compared with QCT. It is concluded that both phantomless QCT and simple ROI attenuation measurements of the lumbar spine are effective for BMD screening at CTC with high sensitivity for osteoporosis, as defined by the DXA T‐score. © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research     

Effects of Traction on Interpretation of Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A New Measurement Method and Diagnostic Criteria Based on Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Quantitative Computed Tomography

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the performance of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and scoliosis. Methodology: Twenty-nine participants (mean age 19.72 ± 6.13 years) underwent whole spine radiography, DXA before and after traction, and QCT alone without traction. Scoliosis and vertebral rotation angles obtained before and after traction were compared, and BMD values from DXA were compared to those obtained via QCT. The scoliosis angle, presented as Cobb's angle of L1–L4, was measured. Results: Cobb's angle significantly decreased from 30.38° ± 24.83° before traction to 22.78° ± 20.41° after traction (p < 0.0001) and the Z-score decreased from −1.88 ± 1.59 to −2.86 ± 2.16 (p < 0.0001). Changes in rotation angle, BMD, and bone mineral content were not significant. Post-traction BMD values and Z-scores showed a higher correlation with QCT measurements than pretraction. Moreover, pre and post-traction Z-scores (≤−1.1 and −1.36, respectively) were more accurate in identifying patients with osteoporosis according to QCT scans compared with the preexisting Z-score of −2 or less. Conclusion: Lumbar BMD measured via DXA and scoliosis allowed a more accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis when traction was applied.     

Unilateral vs Bilateral Hip Bone Mineral Density Measurement for the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis

It has not been established whether unilateral or bilateral hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is preferable for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. We investigated the discordance in DXA measurements in bilateral hips to determine whether unilateral DXA is valid for osteoporosis diagnosis. The subjects were 2964 Japanese patients without a previous diagnosis of primary osteoporosis. We measured bilateral femoral bone mineral density (BMD) and calculated indices, related to the unilateral results, for predicting contralateral hip osteoporosis. A likelihood ratio (LR) of a negative test (LR [−]) of less than 0.2 was considered to exclude the diagnosis. In the normal spinal BMD group, the sensitivity of unilateral DXA for women was 27–73% and LR (−) was 0.28–0.73; the sensitivity for men was 0–50% and LR (−) was 0.51–1.00; the diagnosis of contralateral osteoporosis was not excluded. Sensitivity increased and LR (−) increased with worsening spinal BMD status; however, LR (−) did not meet the cutoff for exclusion. We could exclude unilateral hip osteoporosis, in women only, by performing contralateral femoral DXA; this necessitated lowering the T-score cutoff from −2.5 to −2.0. Unilateral femoral DXA is not useful for excluding the diagnosis of contralateral hip osteoporosis.     

Repeating Measurement of Bone Mineral Density when Monitoring with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: 2019 ISCD Official Position

Bone mineral density (BMD) can be measured at multiple skeletal sites using various technologies to aid clinical decision-making in bone and mineral disorders. BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has a critical role in predicting risk of fracture, diagnosis of osteoporosis, and monitoring patients. In clinical practice, DXA remains the most available and best validated tool for monitoring patients. A quality baseline DXA scan is essential for comparison with all subsequent scans. Monitoring patients with serial measurements requires technical expertise and knowledge of the least significant change in order to determine when follow-up scans should be repeated. Prior ISCD Official Positions have clarified how and when repeat DXA is useful as well as the interpretation of results. The 2019 ISCD Official Positions considered new evidence and clarifies if and when BMD should be repeated. There is good evidence showing that repeat BMD measurement can identify people who experience bone loss, which is an independent predictor of fracture risk. There is good evidence showing that the reduction in spine and hip fractures with osteoporosis medication is proportional to the change in BMD with treatment. There is evidence that measuring BMD is useful following discontinuation of osteoporosis treatment. There is less documentation addressing the effectiveness of monitoring BMD to improve medication adherence, whether monitoring of BMD reduces the risk of fracture, or effectively discriminates patients who should and should not recommence treatment following an interruption of medication. Further research is needed in all of these areas.     

Bone attenuation on routine chest CT correlates with bone mineral density on DXA in patients with COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although primarily a disease of the lungs, is associated with extrapulmonary effects such as muscle weakness and osteoporosis. Fractures owing to osteoporosis cause significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with COPD. To prevent osteoporotic fractures, it is important to diagnose osteoporosis in an early stage and to start anti‐osteoporotic therapy in at‐risk patients. Because routine chest computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to assess the extent of emphysema and airways disease in patients with COPD, we investigated whether simple attenuation measurement of the thoracic spine on routine chest CT may provide useful information on bone health in patients with COPD. Fifty‐eight patients with moderate to very severe COPD were included in our study. The average attenuation of thoracic vertebrae 4, 7, and 10 on chest CT was correlated with the lowest bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip and lumbar spine (L₁ to L₄) on dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) in patients with COPD. The inter‐ and intra‐observer variabilities of the attenuation measurements were low as shown by Bland‐Altman plots. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the average attenuation of the three thoracic vertebrae and the lowest BMD of the hip and lumbar spine was high (r = 0.827, p < 0.001). A receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the area under the curve for osteoporosis was 0.969 (p < 0.001), corresponding to an attenuation threshold of 147 Hounsfield Units (HU). In conclusion, our data demonstrated that bone attenuation measured on routine chest CT correlated strongly with BMD assessed on DXA in patients with COPD. Routine chest CT may provide useful information on bone health in patients with COPD. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Assessment of bone density using the 1.5 T or 3.0 T MRI-based vertebral bone quality score in older patients undergoing spine surgery: does field strength matter?

BACKGROUND CONTEXTRecently published studies have revealed a correlation between MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score and bone mineral density (BMD) measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or quantitative computed tomography (QCT). However, no studies have determined if differences in field strength (1.5 vs 3.0 T) could affect the comparability of the VBQ score among different individuals.PURPOSETo compare the VBQ score obtained from 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI (VBQ_1.5T vs VBQ_3.0T) in patients undergoing spine surgery and assess the predictive performance of VBQ for osteoporosis and osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VCF).DESIGNA nested case‒control study based on an ongoing prospective cohort study of patients undergoing spine surgery.PATIENT SAMPLEAll older patients (men aged >60 years and postmenopausal women) with available DXA, QCT and MR images within 1 month were included.OUTCOME MEASURESVBQ score, DXA T-score, and QCT derived vBMD.METHODSThe osteoporotic classifications recommended by the World Health Organization and American College of Radiology were used to categorize the DXA T-score and QCT-derived BMD, respectively. For each patient, the VBQ score was calculated using T1-weighted MR images. Correlation analysis between VBQ and DXA/QCT was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including determination of the area under the curve (AUC), was performed to assess the predictive performance of VBQ for osteoporosis.ResultsA total of 452 patients (98 men aged >60 years and 354 postmenopausal women) were included in the analysis. Across different BMD categories, the correlation coefficients between the VBQ score and BMD ranged from -0.211 to -0.511, and the VBQ_1.5T score and QCT BMD demonstrated the strongest correlation. The VBQ score was a significant classifier of osteoporosis detected by either DXA or QCT, with VBQ_1.5T showing the highest discriminative power for QCT-osteoporosis (AUC=0.744, 95% CI=0.685–0.803). In ROC analysis, the VBQ_1.5T threshold values ranged from 3.705 to 3.835 with a sensitivity between 48% and 55.6% and a specificity between 70.8% and 74.8%, while the VBQ_3.0T threshold values ranged from 2.59 to 2.605 with a sensitivity between 57.6% and 67.1% and a specificity between 67.8% and 69.7%.CONCLUSIONSVBQ_1.5T exhibited better discriminability between patients with and without osteoporosis than VBQ_3.0T. Considering the non-negligible difference in osteoporosis diagnosis threshold values between the VBQ_1.5T and VBQ_3.0T scores, it is essential to clearly distinguish the magnetic field strength when assessing the VBQ score.     

Identification of Metabolic Bone Disease in Patients with Endogenous Hyperthyroidism: Role of Biological Markers of Bone Turnover

Active hyperthyroidism is associated with reduced bone mass. Nevertheless, not all patients show the same risk for developing osteoporosis. Our aim was to analyze some clinical and biochemical potential predictors of low bone mass in hyperthyroid patients. We studied 127 consecutive hyperthyroid patients (110 females, 17 males; aged 42 ± 16 years). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at lumbar spine (LS; L₂–L₄) and femoral neck (FN). Data were expressed as g/cm² and T-score. Patients were placed into two groups based on recent WHO criteria: Group A, no osteoporosis (n = 98); and group B, lumbar or femoral osteoporosis (n = 29). Study protocol included evaluation of osteoporosis risk factors, anthropometrical variables, thyroid function, and bone turnover markers. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots for the precision of bone markers and multivariate analysis for the prediction of BMD and osteoporosis were performed. Group B showed greater age and proportion of menopausal females; lower weight, height, and calcium intake; longer duration of menopause; and greater levels of total and bone alkaline phosphatase and of urine hydroxyproline. No differences in thyroid function, osteocalcin, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, and type I collagen C-telopeptide (ICTP) were found. The best predictive model accounted for 46% and 62% of the variability of lumbar and femoral BMD respectively and correctly classified 89% of the osteoporotic hyperthyroid patients. No significant difference in ROC plots was observed. It is concluded that hyperthyroid patients with lumbar or femoral osteoporosis show a typical clinical and biochemical profile illustrating that the relationship between BMD and bone markers is better in high turnover states. Classical bone turnover markers show high performance in the evaluation of hyperthyroid bone disease. Received: 5 May 1997 / Accepted: 5 June 1997     

Bone Mineral Density Measurement at Both Spine and Hip for Diagnosing Osteoporosis in Japanese Patients

In Japan, spinal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been commonly performed for diagnosing osteoporosis but scanning the proximal femur is not done widely. The latest Japanese guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, revised in 2006, recommend bone mineral density (BMD) measurement at both spine and hip for diagnosing osteoporosis, although there have been no reports that proved the necessity of those measurements. One thousand forty-one women and 485 men with clinical suspicion of osteoporosis were enrolled in this study, and DXA was performed at both spine and hip. The proportions of the patients who had inconsistency between diagnosis of osteoporosis from spinal DXA and that of hip were estimated. As a result, 22% of women and 15% of men had an inconsistency with the diagnosis of osteoporosis using DXA at each measurement site. There was inconsistency in diagnosing osteoporosis using DXA at the spine and proximal femur measurement sites. Because spine and femoral DXA measurements complement each other in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, BMD measurement at both spine and hip should be performed for all Japanese patients who are suspected osteoporosis, regardless of age and sex.     

Comparison of Indian Council for Medical Research and Lunar Databases for Categorization of Male Bone Mineral Density

The mainstay of diagnosis of osteoporosis is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan measuring areal bone mineral density (BMD) (g/cm²). The aim of the present study was to compare the Indian Council of Medical Research database (ICMRD) and the Lunar ethnic reference database of DXA scans in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in male patients. In this retrospective study, all male patients who underwent a DXA scan were included. The areal BMD (g/cm²) was measured at either the lumbar spine (L1–L4) or the total hip using the Lunar DXA machine (software version 8.50) manufactured by GE Medical Systems (Shanghai, China). The Indian Council of Medical Research published a reference data for BMD in the Indian population derived from the population-based study conducted in healthy Indian individuals, which was used to analyze the BMD result by Lunar DXA scan. The 2 results were compared for various values using statistical software SPSS for Windows (version 16; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A total 238 male patients with a mean age of 57.2?yr (standard deviation ±15.9) were included. Overall, 26.4% (66/250) and 2.8% (7/250) of the subjects were classified in the osteoporosis group according to the Lunar database and the ICMRD, respectively. Out of the 250 sites of the DXA scan, 28.8% (19/66) and 60.0% (40/66) of the cases classified as osteoporosis by the Lunar database were reclassified as normal and osteopenia by ICMRD, respectively. In conclusion, the Indian Council of Medical Research data underestimated the degree of osteoporosis in male subjects that might result in deferring of treatment. In view of the discrepancy, the decision on the treatment of osteoporosis should be based on the multiple fracture risk factors and less reliably on the BMD T-score.     

Osteoporosis in Parkinson's Disease: Relevance of Distal Radius Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and Sarcopenia

Osteoporotic fractures are common in Parkinson's disease (PD). Standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measuring bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and lumbar spine (central sites) has suboptimal sensitivity in predicting fracture risk in the general population. An association between sarcopenia and osteoporosis in PD has not been studied. We compared BMD and osteoporosis prevalence in PD patients vs controls; determined the osteoporosis detection rates using central alone vs central plus distal radius DXA; and analyzed factors (in particular, sarcopenia) associated with osteoporosis. One hundred and fifty-six subjects (102 patients with PD, 54 spousal/sibling controls) underwent femoral neck-lumbar spine-distal radius DXA. Seventy-three patients and 46 controls were assessed for sarcopenia using whole-body DXA and handgrip strength. Patients underwent clinical and serum biochemical evaluations. PD patients had significantly lower body mass index compared to controls. After adjustment for possible confounders, distal radius BMD and T-scores were significantly lower in PD patients compared to controls, but not at the femoral neck/lumbar spine. With distal radius DXA, an additional 11.0% of patients were diagnosed with osteoporosis (32.0% to 43.0%), vs 3.7% in controls (33.3% to 37.0%) additionally diagnosed; this increase was largely driven by the markedly higher detection rate in female PD patients. Female gender (adjusted odds ratio [OR_adjusted] = 11.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6–48.6) and sarcopenia (OR_adjusted = 8.4, 95% CI: 1.1–64.9) were independent predictors for osteoporosis in PD. Distal radius DXA increased osteoporosis detection, especially in female PD patients, suggesting that diagnostic protocols for osteoporosis in PD could be optimized. A close association between osteoporosis and sarcopenia was documented for the first time in PD, which has important implications for clinical management and future research.     

Assessment of bone structure in renal transplant recipients: comparison of phalangeal qualitative ultrasound and dual x-ray absorptiometry

According to the WHO criteria many renal transplant patients display osteopenia or osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the standard method to assess bone mineral density (BMD), is not always available. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the phalanx is an inexpensive, mobile, and radiation-free diagnostic alternative. Few data address the correlation of this method with DXA in renal transplant patients. This study assessed the value of QUS compared with DXA to detect changes in bone structure among renal transplant recipients. This cross-sectional study of 42 patients (22 women), of mean age 40.2 +/- 11.9 years, mean time since transplantation of 2.8 +/- 2.9 years, and mean dialysis time of 8.55 +/- 10.26 months, included. DXA for bone mineral densitometry of the hip (neck and total femur) and spine as well as QUS to measure the amplitude-dependent speed of sound (Ad-SOS) in the phalanx. Using DXA, osteoporosis was observed in 19% of all patients: 9.5% in femoral neck, 9.5% in total region of the femur, and 9.5% in the spinal region. The sensitivity of Ad-SOS for osteoporosis diagnosis in the above regions were 100%, 75%, and 25%, respectively; its specificity was 45%, 43%, and 37%, respectively. There was no significant relation between the two methods for diagnosis of osteoporosis in any region. QUS of phalanx can be recommended for osteoporosis screening in renal transplant patients. Those suspected of osteoporosis should be examined by additional DXA measurements in order to establish the diagnosis.     

定量CT骨密度测定在中老年男性中的应用研究

目的探讨定量CT(quantitative computed tomography,QCT)骨密度测定在中老年男性中的应用价值。方法收集常规查体、年龄50岁以上的男性138例。每例患者均进行血清学指标检测、QCT和双能X线吸收检测法(DXA)骨密度测定。结果随年龄增加,QCT骨密度及DXA的股骨颈骨密度均呈下降趋势(P<0.05)。QCT方法检出低骨量69例(50.0%),骨质疏松27例(19.6%),而DXA方法检出骨量减少43例(31.2%),骨质疏松4例(2.9%),两种方法的检出率差异具有明显统计学意义(P<0.01)。在不同年龄组,QCT均比DXA对骨量减少的检出率高,且随年龄增加检出率逐渐升高(P<0.01)。结论中老年男性QCT较DXA骨密度测定的骨量减少检出率更高,随年龄增加检出率增加,QCT的方法可能更适于中老年男性骨质疏松防治过程中的检测。     

A Comparative Study of Computed Digital Absorptiometry and Conventional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Postmenopausal Women

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether computed digital absorptiometry (CDA) of the hand might be a useful screening technique for identifying patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and to compare the results of CDA with those of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. We studied 230 postmenopausal women (mean age 58.4 ± 7.9 years). For CDA, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with an AccuDEXA Schick densitometer in the third middle phalanx of the nondominant hand. For DXA, BMD of the lumbar spine and upper femur was assessed using a DXA Hologic QDR-1000 densitometer. We did a comparative analysis (ANOVA) and linear correlation tests. Sensitivity and specificity of CDA and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the diagnosis of osteoporosis were calculated. The mean BMD with CDA was 0.445 ± 0.084 (T-score: −1.27 ± 1.29). The mean BMD (g/cm²) with DXA at the lumbar spine was 0.877 ± 0.166 (T-score: −1.52 ± 1.59) and 0.708 ± 0.127 at the femoral neck (T-score: −1.12 ± 1.25). BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck correlated positively with CDA of the hand (r= 0.66 and r= 0.65 respectively, p<0.001). When using as cut-off a T-score of −2.5, according to WHO criteria, 76 women (33%) had osteoporosis of the lumbar spine and/or femoral neck with DXA and 42 (18%) with CDA (p<0.001). The kappa score for osteoporosis was 0.33 for CDA versus spinal DXA and 0.35 for CDA versus femoral DXA. With the cut-off level used, sensitivity and specificity of CDA in detecting osteoporosis at the lumbar spine were 0.39 and 0.90, respectively; sensitivity and specificity of CDA in identifying osteoporosis at the femoral neck were 0.58 and 0.87, respectively. The positive predictive value of CDA for osteoporosis was 69% and the negative predictive value was 75%. The area under the ROC curve for osteoporosis was 0.822 ± 0.028. We conclude that: (a) CDA assessment has a moderate correlation with BMD measured by DXA at the lumbar spine and femoral neck; (b) CDA has a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of osteoporosis compared with spinal and femoral DXA; and (c) predictive values for osteoporosis at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck are acceptable. Received: September 2000 / Accepted: January 2001     

Use of quantitative ultrasound to assess bone status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study.

Periarticular osteoporosis around inflammed joints and generalized osteoporosis have been shown to be markers of disease activity and severity in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Bone mineral density (BMD) in adults can be assessed precisely by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), but this technique has not been used widely in children. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) may provide an alternative method for assessment of bone status. The aim of this pilot study was to compare QUS to DXA in assessing generalized osteoporosis in a cohort of patients JIA. Twenty-two Caucasian children (15 females, 7 males) with JIA of duration 19-142 months (mean 71 mo) and age 7-17 yr were recruited. Total body and lumbar spine BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured by DXA using standard procedures on a Lunar DPX-L scanner. QUS was performed using Myriad SoundScan 2000. Speed of sound (SOS) was measured at the right midtibia. The DXA results were compared to QUS using linear regression analysis. Spine and total body BMD measured by DXA correlated significantly with tibia SOS (spine: r = 0.57, p < 0.007; total body: r = 0.68, p < 0.001). Spine BMC was similarly related to SOS as BMD (r = 0.58, p < 0.007). Individual patient weight and height were strong predictors of BMD, but only moderate predictors of SOS. The mean spine BMD was lower in the JIA patients compared to the normal ranges (mean Z-score of -1.19). BMD Z-scores were negatively associated with disease duration. Patients taking steroids were associated with lower Z-scores. In conclusion, SOS shows a significant correlation with BMD as measured by DXA, albeit with wide 95% confidence intervals in this small pilot study. QUS was also well tolerated and was technically easy to perform in these children. With the added advantage that it is free from radiation risk, further assessment of this potentially valuable tool for measuring bone status in children is warranted.     

Combined Vertebral Assessment and Bone Densitometry Increases the Prevalence and Severity of Osteoporosis in Patients Referred to DXA Scanning

We performed a retrospective study to assess if vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) after routine bone mineral density (BMD) measurement on a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machine had increased the number of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis and revealed previous unknown incident vertebral fractures. A total of 3275 patients were referred to bone densitometry by DXA to be screened for osteoporosis or evaluation of ongoing antiosteoporotic treatment. All spine X-rays obtained at our hospital from the same patients in the period from 3 mo before to 3 mo after the date of DXA scans were reviewed. Among the 3275 patients, 85% were females and 15% were males. In total, 68% of the patients had normal BMD, and 32% had osteoporosis. Vertebral fractures diagnosed by VFA were seen in 7.9% patients, of which 3.2% had normal BMD and 4.8% had osteoporosis assessed by BMD. The relative number of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis increased 9.79% and in absolute terms from 32.4% to 35.6% of patients referred to DXA. Addition of VFA to routine BMD measurement increased clinically significant the number of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis as well as the number of patients with fractures and thereby altered the severity and prognosis.     

Discordance in lumbar bone mineral density measurements by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women: a prospective comparative study

Background ContextLevel-specific lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation of a single vertebral body can provide useful surgical planning and osteoporosis management information. Previous comparative studies have primarily focused on detecting spinal osteoporosis but not at specific levels.PurposeTo compare the detection rate of lumbar osteoporosis between quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); to explore and analyze the distribution models of QCT-derived BMD and DXA T-score at the specific levels; and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of level-specific BMD thresholds for the prediction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) in postmenopausal women.Study Design/SettingA comparative analysis of prospectively collected data comparing QCT-derived BMD with DXA T-score.Patient SampleA total of 296 postmenopausal women who were referred to the spine service of a single academic institution were enrolled.Outcome MeasuresQCT-derived BMD and DXA T-score at specific levels, with or without osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.MethodsPostmenopausal women who underwent QCT and DXA within a week of admission from May 2019 to June 2022 were enrolled. The diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis recommended by the World Health Organization and the American College of Radiology were used for lumbar osteoporotic diagnosis. To evaluate differences in lumbar BMD measurements at specific levels, a threshold of T score=-2.5 and QCT-derived BMD = 80 mg/cm³ were used to categorize level-specific lumbar BMD into low and high BMD. Disagreements in BMD categorization between DXA and QCT were classified as a minor or major discordance based on the definition by Woodson. Data between QCT and DXA were visualized in a stacked bar plot and analyzed. Correlations between DXA and QCT at the specific levels were evaluated using Pearson's linear correlation and scatter plots. Curve fitting of BMD distribution, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) for each single vertebral level was performed.ResultsOf the 296 patients, QCT diagnosed 61.1% as osteoporosis, 30.4% as osteopenia and 8.4% as normal. For those screened with DXA, 54.1% of the patients had osteoporosis, 29.4% had osteopenia and 16.6% had normal BMD. Diagnoses were concordant for 194 (65.5%) patients. Of the other 102 discordant patients, 5 (1.7%) were major and 97 (32.8%) were minor. Significant correlations in level-specific BMD between DXA and QCT were observed (p<.001), with Pearson's correlation coefficients ranging from 0.662 to 0.728. The correlation strength was in the order of L1 > L2 > L3 > L4. The low BMD detection rate for QCT was significantly higher than that for DXA at the L3 and L4 levels (65% vs. 47.9% and 68.1% vs 43.7, respectively, p<.001). Patients with OVCF showed significantly lower QCT-derived BMD (47.2 mg/cm³ vs. 83.2 mg/cm³, p<.001) and T-score (-3.39 vs. -1.98, p<.001) than those without OVCF. Among these patients, 82.8% (101/122) were diagnosed with osteoporosis by QCT measurement, while only 74.6% (91/122) were diagnosed by DXA. For discrimination between patients with and without OVCF, QCT-derived BMD showed better diagnosed performance (AUC range from 0.769 to 0.801) than DXA T-score (AUC range from 0.696 to 0.753).ConclusionQCT provided a more accurate evaluation of lumbar osteoporosis than DXA. The QCT-derived BMD measurements at a specific lumbar level have a high diagnostic performance for OVCF.