The possible cross-tolerance between morphine- and nicotine-induced hypothermia in mice

In the present study, cross-tolerance between hypothermia induced by morphine and nicotine in mice has been investigated. Different doses of morphine or nicotine induced dose-dependent hypothermia. The sub-maximal doses of both drugs were used for interaction studies. Administration of mecamylamine either intracerebroventricularly (2-6 microg/animal icv) or intraperitoneally (0.5 and 1 mg/kg ip) decreased both morphine- or nicotine-induced hypothermia. Naloxone either intracerebroventricularly (2-6 microg/animal) or intraperitoneally (1 and 2 mg/kg) reduced the response to morphine, but not nicotine's response. Hexamethonium (5 and 10 mg/kg ip) caused a slight decrease in morphine's hypothermia, but not that of nicotine. Nicotine's response was decreased in the animals which were made tolerant to hypothermic effect of morphine. Pre-treatment of the animals with low doses of morphine (12.5 or 25 mg/kg), once daily for 3 days, did not cause significant tolerance to the hypothermic response to morphine or nicotine. However, the administration of low doses of morphine (12.5 or 25 mg/kg) plus nicotine (2 mg/kg), once daily for 3 days, increased levels of tolerance to hypothermia induced by either drug. It is concluded that nicotinic receptor mechanism may play a role in morphine-induced hypothermia and there is cross-tolerance between the two drugs.     

Effect of imipramine on the expression and acquisition of morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice

The effect of imipramine and alpha-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists on the acquisition or expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) was studied in mice. An unbiased CPP paradigm was used to study the effect of the agents. In the first set of experiments, the drugs were used during the development of CPP by morphine or they were used alone in order to see if they induce CPP or conditioned place aversion (CPA). Our data showed that intraperitoneal injection of morphine sulphate (2.5-10 mg/kg) induced CPP in mice. Imipramine (0.5-2.5 mg/kg), phenylephrine (0.5-2 mg/kg), yohimbine (0.5-2 mg/kg) or prazosin (0.1-1 mg/kg) did not influence CPP, but clonidine (0.002-0.05 mg/kg) induced CPA. Yohimbine increased, while clonidine and prazosin reversed, morphine-induced CPP. Phenylephrine did not influence the CPP induced by morphine. In the second set of experiments, when the drugs were used before testing on Day 6, in order to test their effects on the expression of morphine-induced CPP, imipramine (0.5-5 mg/kg) reversed morphine-induced CPP and this reversal was blocked by naloxone (2 mg/kg). Clonidine and prazosin reversed, while yohimbine decreased morphine-induced CPP. Phenylephrine did not alter the morphine response. Furthermore, yohimbine and prazosin reversed the imipramine effect. None of the drugs influenced locomotion. However, prazosin or yohimbine in combination with morphine altered locomotor activity during the acquisition of CPP. Yohimbine by itself increased locomotion. It is concluded that imipramine can induce CPA through an opioid receptor mechanism and alpha-adrenoceptor agents may influence morphine CPP.     

Agmatine potentiates morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice: modulation by alpha2-adrenoceptors.

The effects of agmatine, an endogenous polyamine metabolite formed by decarboxylation of L-arginine, and its combination with morphine on conditioned place preference (CPP) has been investigated in male mice. Our data show that subcutaneous administration of morphine (1-7.5 mg/kg) significantly increases the time spent in the drug-paired compartment in a dose-dependent manner. Intraperitoneal administration of agmatine (1-40 mg/kg) alone does not induce either CPP or conditioned place aversion, while combination of agmatine and subeffective doses of morphine leads to potent rewarding effects. Lower doses of morphine (0.1, 0.05, and 0.01 mg/kg) are able to induce CPP in mice pretreated with agmatine 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg, respectively. Concomitant intraperitoneal administration of UK 14 304 (0.5 mg/kg), a highly selective alpha2-agonist, with per se noneffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) and also its combination with noneffective doses of agmatine (1 mg/kg) plus morphine (0.05 mg/kg) produces significant CPP. UK 14 304 (0.05, 0.5 mg/kg) alone, or in combination with agmatine (1, 5 mg/kg) have had no effect. We have further investigated the possible involvement of the alpha2-adrenoceptors in the potentiating effect of agmatine on morphine-induced place preference. Selective alpha2-antagonists, yohimbine (0.005 mg/kg) and RX821002 (0.1, 0.5 mg/kg), block the CPP induced by concomitant administration of agmatine (5 mg/kg) and morphine (0.05 mg/kg). Yohimbine (0.001-0.05 mg/kg) or RX821002 (0.05-0.5 mg/kg) alone or in combination with morphine (0.05 mg/kg) or agmatine (5 mg/kg) fail to show any significant place preference or aversion. Our results indicate that pretreatment of animals with agmatine enhances the rewarding properties of morphine via a mechanism which may involve alpha2-adrenergic receptors.     

Effects of varenicline and mecamylamine on the acquisition, expression, and reinstatement of nicotine-conditioned place preference by drug priming in rats

Nicotine addiction is a chronic disorder characterized by a relatively high rate of relapse even after long period of abstinence. In the present study, we used the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm to investigate the establishment, extinction, reinstatement, and cross-reinstatement of nicotine-induced place conditioning in rats. First, we revealed that nicotine produced a place preference to the initially less-preferred compartment paired with its injections during conditioning (0.175 mg/kg, base, intraperitoneally (i.p.)). Once established, nicotine CPP was extinguished by repeated testing. Following this extinction phase, nicotine-experienced rats were challenged with nicotine (0.175 mg/kg, i.p.) or morphine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). These priming injections of both drugs induced a marked preference for the compartment previously paired with nicotine. Furthermore, given the important role of alpha4beta2 (a4b2) nicotinic receptor subtype in the acquisition and maintenance of nicotine dependence, we evaluated and compared the efficacy of varenicline, a partial a4b2 nicotinic receptor agonist (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)), and mecamylamine (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg, s.c.), a non-selective nicotinic receptor antagonist, in blocking nicotine-induced CPP as well as reinstatement of nicotine CPP provoked by nicotine and morphine. It was shown that both nicotinic receptor ligands attenuated the acquisition and expression of nicotine CPP as well as the expression of reinstatement of nicotine CPP provoked by both drugs. Our results indicate similar cholinergic mechanisms, probably through the a4b2 receptors involved in the rewarding effects of nicotine and morphine in rats and may suggest that nicotinic receptors could be a potential target for developing pharmacotherapeutic strategies to treat and prevent nicotine and/or opioid addiction and relapse.     

The development of cross-tolerance between morphine and nicotine in mice.

In the present study, cross-tolerance between nicotine and morphine in mice has been investigated. Mice were treated subcutaneously with three doses of morphine (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg) once daily, for 3 days in order to produce tolerance to morphine and nicotine antinociception. Tolerance only developed in the high dose group. On the 4th day, the antinociceptive effect of three test doses of morphine (3, 6 and 9 mg/kg) or nicotine (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) were assessed. Tolerance to the responses of both drugs were observed. Intraperitoneal administration of nicotine (2 mg/kg) three times a day for a period of 12 days, also induced tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of both morphine and nicotine. When animals were tested on the 13th day, the antinociceptive responses of morphine or nicotine were reduced. Another group of animals was treated with low doses of morphine daily (12.5 or 25 mg/kg) plus nicotine (2 mg/kg) three times daily for 3 days. In this group of animals, the antinociception to either morphine or nicotine was tested. Combination of both drugs caused an increase in tolerance to either drug. It is concluded that there is cross-tolerance between the two drugs.     

Effects of CNQX and MPEP on sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine

The present study was conducted to evaluate the influence of the glutamatergic receptors α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors on sensitization to the rewarding effects of morphine. The effects of pre-treatment with saline or 20 mg/kg morphine plus the AMPA receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) (5 or 10 mg/kg) or the metabotropic Glu5 receptor antagonist 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) (5 or 10 mg/kg) on the place conditioning induced by a low dose of morphine (2 mg/kg) were assessed. The 2 mg/kg dose of morphine was ineffective in animals pre-treated with saline but induced a clear conditioned place preference (CPP) in mice pre-treated with morphine alone and morphine plus any of the MPEP doses or the lowest dose of CNQX. Conversely, animals pre-treated with morphine plus 10 mg/kg of CNQX did not acquire CPP. Our results suggest that AMPA glutamate receptors are involved in the development of sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine.     

The role of alpha-adrenoceptor mechanism(s) in morphine-induced conditioned place preference in female mice

It has been shown that the alpha-adrenergic system is involved in some effects of opioids, including analgesia and reward. Gender differences also exist between males and females in response to alpha-adrenergic agents. This study was designed to determine the effects of alpha-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists on the acquisition or expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in female mice. The experiments showed that subcutaneous injections of morphine (0.5-8 mg/kg) induced CPP in a dose-dependent manner in mice. Intrapritoneal administration of the alpha-1-adrenoceptor agonist, phenylephrine (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg), and alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine (0.0001, 0.0005 and 0.001 mg/kg), as well as alpha-1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) or alpha-2 adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine (0.005, 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg) did not induce motivational effects and also did not alter locomotor activity in the animals. In the second set of experiments, the drugs were used before testing on Day 5, to test their effects on the expression of morphine-induced CPP. Intrapritoneal administration of phenylephrine and clonidine decreased the expression of morphine-induced CPP. In contrast, after application of prazosin or yohimbine, the expression of morphine-induced CPP was increased. Administration of lower (0.03 mg/kg) and higher doses of phenylephrine (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) during acquisition of morphine CPP decreased and increased the morphine CPP, respectively. Similarly, the administration of prazosin and clonidine decreased while yohimbine increased the morphine CPP. It may be concluded that alpha-adrenoceptor mechanism(s) influence morphine-induced CPP in female mice.     

Role of the cholinergic system in the rat basolateral amygdala on morphine-induced conditioned place preference

The effects of intra-basolateral amygdala (intra-BLA) injections of physostigmine, atropine, nicotine and/or mecamylamine on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats was investigated by using an unbiased 3-day schedule of place conditioning design. Animals that received 3 daily injections of morphine (0.5-10 mg/kg) subcutaneously (s.c.) or saline (1.0 ml/kg, s.c.) showed a significant preference for compartment paired with morphine. The maximum response was observed with 7.5 mg/kg of the opioid. Administration of the anticholinesterase drug, physostigmine (1, 3 and 5 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) elicited a significant CPP. Injections of antimuscarinic receptor agent, atropine (1, 4 and 7 microg/rat) dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (7.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. The injections of nicotine (0.75, 1 and 2 microg/rat) potentiated the morphine (0.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference, while the nicotinic receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (1, 3 and 6 microg/rat) dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (7.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. Furthermore, administration of atropine (7 microg/rat) but not mecamylamine (6 microg/rat) reduced the response induced by different doses of physostigmine plus morphine. Moreover, mecamylamine (6 microg/rat) but not atropine (7 microg/rat) reduced the response induced by different doses of nicotine plus morphine. It is concluded that the muscarinic and nicotinic receptor mechanisms in the BLA may be involved in the acquisition of morphine-induced place preference.     

Cross-reinstatement by cocaine and amphetamine of morphine-induced place preference in mice

The cross-reinstatement by psychostimulants of a conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by morphine was evaluated in mice. In Experiment 1, we examined the effects of a single dose of cocaine and amphetamine on a previously extinguished morphine CPP. After acquisition of CPP induced by morphine (40 mg/kg), animals underwent daily extinction sessions of 15 min duration until the CPP was extinguished. Subsequently, animals received a non-contingent injection of cocaine (25 mg/kg) or amphetamine (4 mg/kg), which produced the reinstatement of the extinguished morphine-induced CPP. In Experiment 2, we evaluated the reinstating effects of several priming doses of cocaine (Experiment 2A) or amphetamine (Experiment 2B). As in the first experiment, after conditioning with morphine (40 mg/kg), mice underwent daily 15 min extinction sessions. When the preference was no longer evident, we tested the effects of cocaine (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg) and amphetamine (0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg/kg) on the reinstatement of CPP. Doses from 12.5 mg/kg of cocaine upward and doses from 1 mg/kg of amphetamine upward effectively reinstated CPP. Our results demonstrate cross-reinstatement with psychostimulants and opiates, suggesting that in abstinent individuals, drug exposure can produce craving for the previously abused drug and relapse.     

Effects of diazepam on conditioned place preference induced by morphine or amphetamine in the rat

RATIONALE: The drug-abuse literature suggests that benzodiazepines may be preferentially abused in conjunction with opioids rather than stimulants. OBJECTIVE: To investigate possible effects of diazepam on the reinforcing effects of morphine and amphetamine. METHODS: The effects of diazepam (0.5, 1 or 2 mg/kg) on the formation and expression of conditioned place preferences (CPP) induced by morphine sulphate (0.3, 0.8, 2 and 8 mg/kg) or D-amphetamine (0.4, 0.8, 2 or 2.5 mg/kg) were studied in an unbiased CPP paradigm. The action of diazepam (1 mg/kg) on conditioned and unconditioned locomotion induced by morphine (2 mg/kg) or amphetamine (2 mg/kg) was assessed. RESULTS: Rats that received conditioning injections of morphine in one environment displayed a preference for this environment. Pre-testing injections of diazepam did not alter the magnitude of this CPP. When diazepam was given with morphine during training, rats displayed a CPP for the environment paired with the two drugs. Injections of amphetamine in one environment also induced a preference for this environment. However, pre-testing injections of diazepam blocked the expression of amphetamine-induced CPP, and co-injections of diazepam blocked the formation of amphetamine CPP. Diazepam itself did not produce a CPP nor did it alter spontaneous place preferences. Diazepam equally blocked both morphine and amphetamine unconditioned and conditioned locomotor hyperactivity. This indicates that its effects on morphine and amphetamine CPP were not due to a differential effect on locomotion. CONCLUSIONS: Diazepam interferes with the reinforcing properties of amphetamines but not of morphine. The reinforcing effects of morphine and amphetamine are pharmacologically dissociable.     

Calcium channel antagonists attenuate cross-sensitization to the rewarding and/or locomotor effects of nicotine, morphine and MK-801

The present study focused on the evaluation of behavioural cross-sensitization, particularly in locomotor activities and conditioned rewarding effects, between nicotine and morphine, cocaine, amphetamine or MK-801. Nicotine (0.5 mg kg(-1))-experienced mice manifested an enhanced locomotor response to morphine (5 mg kg(-1)) or MK-801 (0.3 mg kg(-1)). No cross-sensitization was observed between nicotine and amphetamine (2 mg kg(-1)) or cocaine (15 mg kg(-1)). Additionally, the L-type voltage-dependent calcium-channel antagonists, nimodipine and verapamil, but not diltiazem, at a dose of 20 mg kg(-1) injected before morphine or MK-801 challenge, blocked the expression of this cross-sensitization. In the second test, an enhancement of morphine place conditioning in rats pre-exposed to nicotine (0.5 mg kg(-1), injected daily for 5 days) was demonstrated. After two conditioning sessions, morphine (5 mg kg(-1)) induced a clear place preference only in animals that had previously received nicotine injections. The administration of nimodipine (10 and 20 mg kg(-1)), verapamil (10 and 20 mg kg(-1)) and diltiazem (10 and 20 mg kg(-1)) prior to nicotine dose-dependently prevented this sensitization to the rewarding effect of morphine produced by prior injections of nicotine. These findings support the hypothesis that similar neural calcium-dependent mechanisms are involved in the appetitive effects of nicotine and morphine and in the sensitized locomotor stimulant effects of nicotine and morphine or MK-801.     

Effects of bupropion on the reinstatement of nicotine-induced conditioned place preference by drug priming in rats

Nicotine is one of the most widely consumed psychoactive drugs, and its consumption is currently associated with other drugs of abuse, such as opioids. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the atypical antidepressant drug bupropion (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg, ip) in blocking the reinstatement of nicotine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) provoked by nicotine and morphine. It was shown that nicotine produced a place preference to the initially less-preferred compartment paired with its injections during conditioning (0.175 mg/kg, ip, free base, three drug sessions). Once established, nicotine-induced CPP was extinguished by repeated testing. Following this extinction phase, the reinstatement of CPP was investigated. Nicotine-experienced rats were challenged with nicotine (0.175 mg/kg, ip) or morphine (10 mg/kg, ip). These priming injections of both drugs induced a marked preference for the compartment previously paired with nicotine. Our results demonstrated that bupropion (10 and 20 mg/kg) attenuated the nicotine-induced reinstatement of nicotine-conditioned response. Moreover, bupropion (5 and 10 mg/kg) diminished the morphine-induced reinstatement of nicotine-conditioned response. The results of our studies suggest that bupropion may offer an interesting approach to the relapse-prevention pharmacotherapy of addiction, including nicotinism and polydrug abuse.     

Reinstatement of nicotine-conditioned place preference by drug priming: effects of calcium channel antagonists

Reinstatement of drug-seeking behaviour in animals is relevant to drug relapse in humans. In the present study, we used the conditioned place preference paradigm to investigate the establishment, extinction, reinstatement and cross-reinstatement of nicotine-induced place conditioning in rats. Nicotine produced a place preference to the initially less-preferred compartment paired with its injections during conditioning (0.5 mg/kg, i.p., three drug sessions). Once established, nicotine place preference was extinguished by repeated training. Following this extinction phase, the reinstatement of place conditioning was investigated. For this purpose, nicotine-experienced rats were challenged with nicotine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) or morphine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). These priming injections of both drugs renewed a marked preference for the compartment previously paired with nicotine. In the second step, we examined the influence of the calcium channel antagonists, nimodipine (10 and 20 mg/kg, i.p.) and flunarizine (5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.), on the reinstatement of nicotine-conditioned place preference induced by priming doses of nicotine and morphine. It was shown that the calcium channel blockers dose dependently attenuated the reinstatement of nicotine place preference induced by both drugs. These findings support the hypothesis that similar neural calcium-dependent mechanisms are involved in nicotine- and morphine-induced reinstatement. Finally, the conditioned place preference paradigm appears to be a useful tool for studies of the relapse of drug-seeking behaviour in laboratory animals.     

Theophylline inhibits tolerance and sensitization induced by morphine: a conditioned place preference paradigm study in female mice

The effect of theophylline on reward properties of morphine was examined in the present study. A biased conditioned place preference paradigm was used to study the effects of theophylline on the development of conditioned place preference by morphine in sensitized and tolerant female mice. Subcutaneous injection of morphine (0.5-10 mg/kg) induced conditioned place preference in mice, while intraperitoneal administration of theophylline (2.5-100 mg/kg) did not induce conditioned place preference or conditioned place aversion. Theophylline (2.5-100 mg/kg) in combination with morphine (5 mg/kg), during conditioning sessions, decreased the acquisition of morphine conditioned place preference dose independently. Administration of theophylline (2.5-100 mg/kg) before testing also caused a significant reduction of the expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference in a dose-independent manner. Administration of morphine (12.5, 25 or 50 mg/kg) daily, for 3 days, produced tolerance to conditioned place preference induced by the drug (5 mg/kg). Administration of theophylline (2.5 and 10 mg/kg) 1 h before morphine (12.5, 25 mg/kg), during development of tolerance, abolished morphine tolerance. A higher dose of theophylline (100 mg/kg), however, did not alter morphine tolerance. In addition, theophylline (2.5, 10 and 100 mg/kg) failed to reduce tolerance to a higher dose of morphine (50 mg/kg). Daily administration of morphine (5 mg/kg) for 3 days followed by a 5-day interval caused sensitization to morphine place conditioning. When theophylline was administered (2.5, 10 and 100 mg/kg) 1 h before morphine (5 mg/kg), during development of sensitization, inhibition of morphine-induced sensitization was demonstrated. The effect of theophylline was dose independent. It is concluded that while theophylline has no effect by itself, it reduced both the acquisition and expression of morphine conditioned place preference. In addition, theophylline reduced the acquisition of morphine conditioned place preference in morphine-sensitized and morphine-tolerant mice.     

Inhibition of the cyclooxygenase pathway attenuates morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice

Prostanoids are shown to be important lipid mediators, not only in periphery but also in the brain, where they appear to modulate synaptic transmission. Recent studies have demonstrated that cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway might modulate the neurotransmission of gamma-aminobutyric acid and dopamine in the central nervous system. In this study, we have evaluated the effects of indomethacin (a non-selective COX inhibitor) and celecoxib (a selective COX-2 inhibitor) on the acquisition of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in male Swiss mice. Our data shows that morphine (2.5-7.5 mg/kg) induces place preference conditioning in a dose-dependent manner. Celecoxib (0.01-5 mg/kg) and indomethacin (1 mg/kg) fail to produce a significant CPP or conditioned place aversion (CPA); however, higher doses of celecoxib (10 mg/kg) and indomethacin (5 mg/kg) induce CPA. Co-administration of celecoxib (0.5-5 mg/kg) or indomethacin (1-5 mg/kg) with morphine during the conditioning phase, blocked the acquisition of morphine CPP. These results indicate that the reward properties of morphine can be modulated by inhibiting COX activity in mice.     

Morphine-induced place preference: involvement of cholinergic receptors of the ventral tegmental area

In the present study, the effects of intra-ventral tegmental area injections of cholinergic agents on morphine-induced conditioned place preference were investigated by using an unbiased 3-day schedule of place conditioning design in rats. The conditioning treatments with subcutaneous injections of morphine (0.5-7.5 mg/kg) induced a significant dose-dependent conditioned place preference for the drug-associated place. Intra-ventral tegmental area injection of an anticholinesterase, physostigmine (2.5 and 5 microg/rat) or nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, nicotine (0.5 and 1 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) elicited a significant conditioned place preference. Furthermore, intra-ventral tegmental area administration of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, atropine (1-4 microg/rat) or nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (5 and 7.5 microg/rat) dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. Atropine or mecamylamine reversed the effect of physostigmine or nicotine on morphine response respectively. The injection of physostigmine, but not atropine, nicotine or mecamylamine, into the ventral tegmental area alone produced a significant place aversion. Moreover, intra-ventral tegmental area administration of the higher doses of physostigmine or atropine, but not nicotine or mecamylamine decreased the locomotor activity. We conclude that muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the ventral tegmental area may critically mediate the rewarding effects of morphine.     

Involvement of dopamine D2 receptors of the central amygdala on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference in rat

In the present study, the effects of intra-central amygdala (CeA) injections of dopamine (DA) D2-like receptor agonist and antagonist on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference in male Wistar rats have been investigated. Subcutaneous administration of different doses of morphine sulphate (0.5-10 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent conditioned place preference (CPP). Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, it was found that the DA D2/D3 receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.3-3 microg/rat), or the DA D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride (0.04-5 microg/rat), did not produce a significant place preference or place aversion. Intra-CeA administration of quinpirole (0.3 and 1 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) elicited a significant CPP. On the other hand, quinpirole (0.3 microg/rat) injection into the CeA induced CPP in combination with the lower doses of morphine (0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg), but decreased the response of higher dose (7.5 mg/kg) of morphine. This response of quinpirole was attenuated by sulpiride (0.2 microg/rat). Sulpiride by itself (0.04-5 microg/rat) reduced the acquisition of morphine (7.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. The administration of the higher dose of sulpiride (1 and 5 microg/rat) or the higher dose of quinpirole (3 microg/rat) during acquisition decreased the locomotor activity of the animals on the testing days. The injection of the low dose of quinpirole (0.3 microg/rat) on the test day reduced the expression of morphine-induced CPP, but the high dose of quinpirole (3 microg/rat) potentiated this expression. The administration of sulpiride (5 microg/rat) attenuated the quinpirole response. The injection of sulpiride (1 and 5 microg/rat) abolished the expression of morphine-induced CPP. It is concluded that the CeA DA D2-like receptors may play an active role in morphine reward.     

Chronic naltrexone supersensitizes the reinforcing and locomotor-activating effects of morphine

Rats were implanted for 10 days with a slow-release naltrexone pellet and then the pellet was removed. Sham-control animals were treated similarly, except no pellet was implanted. One day after pellet removal or sham treatment, animals were assessed for morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) or locomotor activity. CPP was evident in sham animals following two conditioning trials using 5 mg/kg subcutaneous morphine (Experiment 1) and following one conditioning trial using 8 mg/kg intravenous morphine (Experiment 2). Animals conditioned while implanted with a naltrexone pellet showed no morphine-induced CPP. More important, one day after pellet removal, naltrexone-pretreated animals given one conditioning trial with 5 mg/kg intravenous morphine displayed a greater preference for morphine-associated cues relative to sham animals given morphine (Experiment 3 and 4). This single IV morphine dose was insufficient to produce CPP in sham animals, suggesting that naltrexone-induced supersensitization may only be evident at a morphine dose below the reinforcing threshold in control animals. Further, chronic naltrexone potentiated the locomotor-activating effect of 2 mg/kg subcutaneous morphine but not of either 1 or 5 mg/kg morphine (Experiment 5). Behavioral supersensitization assessed by morphine-induced locomotor activation was transient, as it was evident one day, but not either three or 10 days following pellet removal (Experiment 6). These results confirm the functional significance of opiate receptor up-regulation following chronic opioid blockade.     

The effects of nitric oxide on the acquisition and expression of nicotine-induced conditioned place preference in mice

In the present study, the possible role of nitric oxide on the conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by nicotine in mice was investigated. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of nicotine (1 mg/kg) and the nitric oxide (NO) precursor, L-arginine (200 and 500 mg/kg), produced significant place preference. However, injection of mecamylamine (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg; i.p.) or the NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor, L-Nitro-amino-methyl-ester, L-NAME (5-20 mg/kg; i.p.), had no effect. Ineffective doses of nicotine in combination with ineffective doses of L-arginine produced significant place preference. Administration of L-arginine (50, 100 and 150 mg/kg; i.p.) on the test day reduced the expression of nicotine-induced place preference. Nicotine injection (0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 mg/kg) on the test day reduced the expression of place preference induced by L-arginine, while both mecamylamine (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) and L-NAME (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg) inhibited the acquisition of place preference induced by nicotine (1 mg/kg) and L-arginine (200 mg/kg). Moreover, neither of the antagonists reduced the expression of nicotine- or L-arginine-induced place preference. It is suggested that nitric oxide may play an important role in nicotine-induced place preference.     

Involvement of dopamine receptors of the dorsal hippocampus on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference in rats

In the present study, the effects of bilateral intrahippocampal CA1 injections of dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists on the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced place preference were examined in male Wistar rats. Subcutaneous administration of different doses of morphine sulphate (0.5-10 mg/kg) produced a conditioned place preference (CPP) dose-dependently. Using a 3-day schedule of conditioning, it was found that dopamine D1 receptor agonist, SKF 38393 (0.01-1 microg/rat), dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.25-1 microg/rat), dopamine D(2/3) receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.3-3 microg/rat) or dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride (0.04-5 microg/rat) did not produce significant place preference. The administration of SKF 38393 (1 microg/rat) significantly potentiated the acquisition of morphine (0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. This potentiation was reversed by SCH 23390 (1 microg/rat) pretreatment. Quinpirole injection (0.3 microg/rat) induced CPP in combination with the lower doses of morphine but decreased the response of the higher doses of morphine. These responses of quinpirole were reversed by sulpiride (5 microg/rat) pretreatment. SCH 23390 or sulpiride reduced the acquisition of morphine (7.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. The administration of sulpiride, but not other drugs, during acquisition showed an increase in the locomotor activity on the testing days. SKF 38393, SCH 23390 or sulpiride, but not quinpirole when used before testing, reduced the expression of morphine-induced place preference. Sulpiride, but not other drugs, increased locomotion when used before testing. It is concluded that dorsal hippocampal dopamine receptors may play an active role in morphine reward.