New onset of pacemaker dependency after permanent pacemaker implantation

Pacemaker dependency has dangerous consequences under conditions of electromagnetic interference, unrecognized lead dysfunction, and battery depletion, and has been associated with cardiovascular and overall mortality. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of new onset of pacemaker dependency during long-term follow-up after pacing system implantation. The study included 518 patients (mean age 72.9 +/- 10.4 years) who presented with intrinsic rhythms at the time of implantation. Indications for pacing were sick sinus syndrome (SSS) in 275 (53%) patients, AV block in 209 (40%), and AF with bradycardia in 34 (7%) patients. The mean follow-up was 3.7 +/- 2.7 years (range 1-17). Pacemaker dependency was defined as the absence of an intrinsic rhythm during backup pacing at 30 beats/min for 30 seconds. New onset of pacemaker dependency was observed in 23 (4.4%) of the 518 patients at a mean of 3.1 +/- 2.7 years of follow-up. Pacing indications were SSS in 6 (2.2%) of 275 patients, AV block in 15 (7.2%) of 209, and AF with bradycardia in 2 (5.9%) of 34. Patients with AV block had a significantly higher incidence of pacemaker dependency than patients with SSS (odds ratio 3.51; 95% CI 1.3 to 9.3; P = 0.012). The average annual rate of new pacemaker dependency was 1.6% during an 8-year follow-up. The incidence of new onset of pacemaker dependency varied among pacing indications, and was significantly higher in patients with AV block than patients with SSS.     

Sinus and paced P wave duration and dispersion as predictors of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in patients with isolated sick sinus syndrome

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the sinus and the paced P wave duration and dispersion as predictors of AF after pacemaker implantation in patients with isolated sick sinus syndrome (SSS). The study included 109 (69 women, mean age 72 +/- 11 years) patients with SSS, 59 with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome (BTS). A 12-lead ECG was recorded before pacemaker implantation and during high right atrial and septal right atrial pacing at 70 and 100 beats/min. The ECGs were scanned into a computer and analyzed on screen. The patients were treated with AAIR (n = 52) or DDDR pacing. The P wave duration was measured in each lead and mean P wave duration and P wave dispersion were calculated for each ECG. AF during follow-up was defined as: AF in an ECG at or between follow-up visits; an atrial high rate episode with a rate of > or =220 beats/min for > or =5 minutes, atrial sensing with a rate of > or =170 beats/min in > or =5% of total counted beats, mode-switching in >/=5% of total time recorded, or a mode switching episode of > or =5 minutes recorded by the pacemaker telemetry. The ECG parameters were correlated to AF during follow-up. Mean follow-up was 1.5 +/- 0.9 years. None of the ECG parameters differed between patients with AF and patients without AF during follow-up, nor was there any difference between groups after correction for BTS and age. BTS was the strongest predictor of AF during follow-up (P < 0.001). P wave duration and dispersion measured before and during pacemaker implantation were not predictive of AF after pacemaker implantation in patients with isolated SSS.     

Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease

BACKGROUND: Single lead atrial (AAI(R)) pacing for sick sinus syndrome provides physiological pacing and is less expensive than a dual chamber system. Compared with ventricular-based pacing, it maintains the normal cardiac depolarization sequence, is associated with less atrial fibrillation and heart failure, and avoids pacemaker syndrome. We sought whether it is possible to select patients for AAI(R) pacing with a low likelihood of subsequent ventricular pacing, and whether this approach was cost-effective. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of AAI(R) pacemaker implantations. Patients requiring a further procedure for insertion of a ventricular lead (for DDD(R) or VVI(R) pacing) were compared with those who remained atrially paced. RESULTS: 2.7% (117 of 4,366) of implants were AAI(R), compared with less than 1% overall for New Zealand and Australia. During follow-up of 3.5 (2.3, 7.7) years, insertion of a ventricular lead was required in 14 (12%), and was more likely in those with pre-existing PR interval >0.20 seconds (odds ratio 7.8, P = 0.003) or left bundle branch block (LBBB, odds ratio 17, P = 0.037). Right bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block, or history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were not more frequent in the group requiring ventricular pacing, and preimplantation Wenckebach point was not different. The most efficient strategy was initial AAIR implantation in all except those with LBBB or PR interval >0.20 seconds. Compared with routine DDDR implantation, cost was reduced by 20%, with a 1.4% annual incidence of further procedures. CONCLUSION: AAIR is the appropriate pacing choice for sick sinus syndrome without LBBB or PR interval >0.20 seconds.     

Atrioventricular Conduction Disturbances in Patients with Sinoatrial Node Disease and Atrial Pacing

In sinoatrial node disease (SND) atrial pacing may be limited by progression of AV block. The incidence of AV block after All systems implantation range, according to various authors, from 0% to 12%. The aim of this study was to examine the AV conduction disturbances that forced a change in the mode of pacing in patients with AAI pacemakers. The information was collected retrospectively from a cohort of 122 patients. The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 83 months (mean = 35J. Among these patients there were 37 with sinus bradycardia and 85 with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome. Their mean age was 63 years. Before AAI pacemaker insertion, all patients had normal AV conduction on 12-lead EGG, and all but five had a Wenckebach cycle length shorter than 500 msec. Seven out of these 122 patients (5.7%) developed symptomatic conduction disturbances (second-degree type I AV block in five, second degree type II AV block in one, and third-degree AV block in one], necessitating a change from AAI to another mode of pacing. We conclude that progression of AV block after atrial pacemaker implantation in patients with SND is infrequent and mild in the majority of cases. Intraventricular disturbances such as left anterior hemiblock represent contraindication to AAI pacing particularly in patients who may be in need of antiarrhythmic drugs.     

Development of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrioventricular block after atrioventricular synchronized pacing

Many studies have evidenced an increased incidence of AF in patients receiving single chamber ventricular pacing (VVI) when compared with those undergoing an atrial-based system (AAI or DDD). However, the difference in incidence of AF between two atrial-based systems (VDD, DDD) in patients with AV block was still controversial. This study was conducted to compare the development of AF between different modes of pacemakers (VDD and DDD) in patients with symptomatic AV block. A retrospective review was conducted of the detailed records of all consecutive patients who received permanent pacemakers due to symptomatic bradycardia from March 1995 to March 2000. The occurrence of AF was documented when there was presence of AF in the free-run or 12-lead ECG, any ECG strips, or persistent AF on 24-hour Holter ECG during the follow-up. The study included 152 patients (44 women, 108 men; mean age 73). The patients were divided into two groups: VDD (n = 100) and DDD (n = 52). The mean follow-up was 48.9 +/- 22.9 months. The incidence of AF was 7.9%. A higher incidence of AF was noted in the DDD group (15.4%) when compared with the VDD group (4.0%, P = 0.023). The incidence of development of AF in patients with AV block was higher in those receiving DDD cardiac pacing when compared with those who received the VDD system. The authors suggest that VDD pacing may be a better choice than the DDD system for patients with AV block, but without clinical evidence of sinus node dysfunction, and if an atrial lead is required, it should be placed close to the Bachmann's bundle.     

Upgrade of single chamber pacemakers with transvenous leads to dual chamber pacemakers in pediatric and young adult patients

Children with single chamber pacemakers, in adolescence and young adulthood, may be upgraded to dual chamber systems, but there are no published data about indications, timing, and complications. Upgrading was attempted in 18 patients with transvenous pacing leads. A retrospective analysis of all collected data was performed. At initial pacemaker implantation (mean +/- SD, 9.3 +/- 4.1 years), the pacing mode was VVIR (n = 13 patients) and AAI/AAIR (n = 5 patients). After 72 +/- 41 months of follow-up, at the age of 15.5 +/- 5.2 years, upgrade was undertaken because of the patient's age at elective generator replacement (n = 3 patients), ventricular dysfunction (n = 7), syncope/presyncope (n = 3) in patients with VVIR pacing, atrioventricular block (n = 2), and/or drug refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (n = 4) in patients with atrial pacing. In comparison with single chamber pacemaker implantations, the average procedural time and the average fluoroscopy time were not significantly longer. All suitable preexisting leads were incorporated in the new pacing system. Leads were inserted via the ipsilateral subclavian vein in 16 patients. Venous occlusion was found in two patients: in the first the procedure was not performed; in the second, the contralateral vein was used and the old lead was abandoned. There were no procedural complications. During a follow-up of 14 +/- 11 months, ventricular dysfunction worsened in five of seven patients; other patients benefitted symptomatically. In conclusion, pacemaker upgrade is technically challenging but feasible and safe and may be beneficial for some patients.     

Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode

Background  

Right ventricular (RV) pacing increases the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and hospitalization rate for heart failure. Many patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) are implanted with a DDDR pacemaker to ensure the treatment of slowly conducted atrial fibrillation and atrioventricular (AV) block. Many pacemakers are never reprogrammed after implantation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of programming DDIR with a long AV delay in patients with SND and preserved AV conduction as a possible strategy to reduce RV pacing in comparison with a nominal DDDR setting including an AV search hysteresis.     

Efficacy of single lead VDD pacing in patients with impaired and normal left ventricular function

Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing seems to be the best pacing mode for patients with advanced AV block and impaired LV function. The long-term follow-up of single lead VDD pacing was studied in 33 patients with impaired LV function and compared to 42 patients with normal LV function. All patients received the same VDD lead and VDDR pacemaker. The lead model with 13-cm AV spacing between the atrial and ventricular electrode was implanted in 89% of the patients. Follow-ups were 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. The percentage of atrial sensing and the P wave amplitude were determined at each follow-up. Minimal P wave amplitude at implantation was 2.0 +/- 1.4 mV in patients with impaired and 1.7 +/- 0.9 mV with normal LV function (not significant). At the 12-month follow-up, 33 patients with normal and 23 patients with depressed LV function remained paced in the VDD mode. The remaining patients died in five (impaired LV function) and seven cases (normal LV function) or their pacemakers were programmed to the VVI/VVIR pacing mode in four (impaired LV function) and three cases (normal LV function). P wave amplitude did not differ in the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 1.17 +/- 0.42 mV; normal: 1.09 +/- 0.49 mV). The atrial sensitivity was programmed in most patients to sensitive settings with no differences between the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 0.13 +/- 0.06 mV; normal: 0.13 +/- 0.05 mV). The diagnostic counters indicated nearly permanent atrial sensing (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 99.3 +/- 2.2%; normal: 99.0 +/- 1.0 mV). In conclusions, single lead VDD pacing restored AV synchronous ventricular pacing in patients with normal and with impaired LV function indicating that it could be an alternative to DDD pacemakers, but not to dual-chamber pacing.     

Long-term complication rates in ventricular, single lead VDD, and dual chamber pacing

A higher incidence of pacemaker related complications has been reported in DDD systems as compared to VVI devices. The implantation of single lead VDD pacemakers might reduce the complication rate of physiological pacing in patients with AV block. In a retrospective study, the data records of 1,214 consecutive patients with pacemaker implantation for AV block between 1990 and 2001 (VVI 36.5%, DDD 32.9%, VDD 30.6%) were analyzed. Complications requiring surgical interventions were compared during a follow-up period of 64 +/- 31 months. Operation and fluoroscopic times were longer in DDD pacemaker implantation compared to VDD and VVI devices:58 +/- 23 versus 39 +/- 10 and 37 +/- 13 minutes (P<0.001), 9.2 +/- 5.2 versus 4.1 +/- 2.4 and 3.5 +/- 2.3 minutes, respectively. Differences remained significant after correction for covariates. In a multivariate Cox regression model, the corrected complication hazard of a DDD pacemaker implantation was increased by 3.9 (1.4-11.3) compared to VVI and increased by 2.3 (1.1-4.5) compared to VDD pacing. Higher complication rates in DDD pacing were mainly due to a higher incidence of early reoperation for atrial lead dysfunction, whereas the long-term complication rate was not different from VDD or VVI pacing. Early and long-term complication rates did not differ between VDD and VVI pacemaker systems. In conclusion, operation time and complication rates of physiological pacing are reduced by VDD pacemaker implantation achieving values comparable to VVI pacing. Thus, single lead VDD pacing can be recommended for patients with AV block.     

Long-Term Survival of Chosen Atrial-Based Pacing Modalities

Atrial-based cardiac pacing modalities were chosen in 341 of 684 (50%) patients selected for permanent cardiac pacing at the Grey Nuns Community Health Center between 1989 and 1995. There were 183 males and 158 females. Mean age was 70 years (range 8–97 years). The indications for atrial-based pacing were: advanced atri- oventricular (AV) block (n = 166) 49%; sick sinus syndrome (n = 153) 45%; hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome (n = 11) 3%; neurocardiac syncope (n = 10) 2.9%; and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1) 0.3%. Forty-eight patients had a known history of paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias. All patients had routine follow-up performed at 24 hours, 7 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, and then 6 biannuallv. Mean follow-up was 6.5 years (range 1 month to 12 years). Observed survival of the programmed atrial-based modality was compared to the original mode chosen at the time of implantation. Thirty-five of 37 (95%) chosen for AAIR modes remain programmed AAIR. Twenty-two of 24 (92%) chosen for VDDR modes remain programmed VDDR. Two hundred and fifty-five of 280 (91 %) chosen for DDD or DDDR modes remain programmed DDDR. Two of 37 (5%) patients originally implanted with AAI pacing systems were upgraded to DDDR mode due to new onset AV block. One of 24 (4%) patients originally implanted with a VDDR pacing system was upgraded to DDDR due to loss of atrial sensing of the single pass lead. Twenty-six of 304 (8.5%) patients originally implanted with DDD/DDDR (n - 25) and VDDR (n = 1) pacing systems were reprogrammed to VVI or WIR: 16 (62%) due to sustained refractory atrial arrhythmias; 5 (19%) due to atrial lead malfunction; and 5 (19%) due to reasons unrelated to the pacing system. With careful review of the patients' conduction disorder and appropriate selection of pacing modality, the observed survival of long-term atrial-based pacing remains at 92% when compared to the chosen modality at the time of implantation. Atrial-based pacing may be used to reduce the incidence of atrial dysrhythmia with careful programming of the base atrial pacing rates.     

AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial

In 19 patients paced and medicated for bradycardia tachycardia syndrome (BTS), AAIR and DDDR pacing were compared with regard to quality of life (QoL), atrial tachyarrhythmia (AFib), exercise tolerance, and left ventricular (LV)function. Patients had a PQ interval < or = 240 ms during sinus rhythm, no second or third degree AV block, no bundle branch block, or bifascicular block. In DDDR mode, AV delay was optimized using the aortic time velocity integral. After 3 months, QoL was assessed by questionnaires, patients were investigated by 24-hour Holter, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) was performed, and LV function was determined by echocardiography. QoL was similar in all dimensions, except dizziness, showing a significantly lower prevalence in AAIR mode. The incidence of AFib was 12 episodes in 2 patients with AAIR versus 22 episodes in 7 patients with DDDR pacing (P = 0.072). In AAIR mode, 164 events of second and third degree AV block were detected in 7 patients (37%) with pauses between 1 and 4 seconds. During CPX, exercise duration and work load were higher in AAIR than in DDDR mode (423+/-127 vs 402+/-102 s and 103+/-31 vs 96+/-27 Watt, P < 0.05). Oxygen consumption (VO2), was similar in both modes. During echocardiography, only deceleration of early diastolic flow velocity and early diastolic closure rate of the anterior mitral valve leaflet were higher in DDD than in AAI pacing (5.16+/-1.35 vs 3.56+/-0.95 m/s2 and 69.2+/-23 vs 54.1+/-26 mm/s, P < 0.05). As preferred pacing mode, 11 patients chose DDDR, 8 patients chose AAIR. Hence, AAIR and DDDR pacing seem to be equally effective in BTS patients. In view of a considerable rate of high degree AV block during AAIR pacing, DDDR mode should be preferred for safety reasons.     

A New Dual-Chamber Pacing Mode to Minimize Ventricular Pacing

Despite the low long-term incidence of high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block and the known negative effects of ventricular pacing, programming of the AAI mode in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) remains exceptional. A new pacing mode was, therefore, designed to combine the advantages of AAI with the safety of DDD pacing. AAIsafeR behaves like the AAI mode in absence of AV block. First- and second-degree AV blocks are tolerated up to a predetermined, programmable limit, and conversion to DDD takes place in case of high-degree AV block. From DDD, the device may switch back to AAI, provided AV conduction has returned. The safety of AAIsafeR was examined in 43 recipients (70 ± 12-year old, 24 men) of dual chamber pacemakers implanted for SND or paroxysmal AV block. All patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings before hospital discharge and at 1 month of follow-up with the AAIsafeR mode activated. No AAIsafeR-related adverse event was observed. At 1 month, the device was functioning in AAIsafeR in 28 patients (65%), and the mean rate of ventricular pacing was 0.2%± 0.4%. Appropriate switches to DDD occurred in 15 patients (35%) for frequent, unexpected AV block. AAIsafeR mode was safe and preserved ventricular function during paroxysmal AV block, while maintaining a very low rate of ventricular pacing. The performance of this new pacing mode in the prevention of atrial fibrillation will be examined in a large, controlled study.     

病态窦房结综合征伴房室传导延迟AAI与DDD起搏模式右心功能的超声评价

目的探讨AAI与DDD起搏模式下病态窦房结综合征伴房室传导阻滞患者的右心功能。方法 35例病态窦房结综合征伴Ⅰ度房室传导阻滞植入DDD双腔起搏器患者,先用程控仪将起搏器程控为DDD模式,最后程控为AAI模式。超声心动图检测患者2种起搏模式下的各参数变化情况。结果 DDD起搏模式下的RVPEP、RVPEP/RVET、Sm、Tei指数明显高于AAI起搏模式（P〈0.05）,E/Em低于AAI起搏模式（P〈0.05）。结论 AAI起搏模式右心的收缩和舒张功能均优于AV间期优化的DDD起搏模式。     

Acute Changes in Left Atrial and Left Ventricular Diameters After Physiological Pacing

The present study examined alterations in left atria! diameter (LAD) and diastolic left ventricular diameter (LVDd) in 37 patients (72.2 ± 9.8 years old) who received physiological pacemakers; 22 with atrioventricular (AV) block and 15 with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). After pacemaker implantation, LAD and LVDd were serially measured using echocardiography, and their diameters ware expressed per body surface area (LADI and LVDdl; mm/m). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and cardiac output (CO) were measured in ten patients with SSS and ten with AV block during both right ventricular and AV sequential pacing. After AV sequential pacing, CO increased in 19 of 20 patients (3.2 ± 0.9 L/min to 3.9 ± 1.0 L/min: P < 0.001). LADI decreased from 24.9 ± 4.2 mm/m² to 21.8 ± 4.4 mm/m² (P < 0.001) in 22 patients with AV block and from 24.1 ± 3.4 mm/m² to 20.4 ± 3.8 mm/m² (P < 0.001) in 15 SSS patients. However, LVDdl did not change significantly in either group of patients. The changes in LAD after the implantation of a physiological pacemaker occurred rapidly, i.e. LAD began to decrease within 1 minute after the procedure, and then reached a plateau. This plateau phase continued for at least 7 days during physiological pacing. There was a positive correlation between the changes in LADI after pacemaker implantation and those in PCWP observed during the AV sequential pacing performed prim- to the implantation (r = 0.86; P < 0.001). The reduction in LAD following pacemaker implantation was rapid and seemed to be accompanied by improvement of cardiac function. Thus, it is suggested that the serial measurement of LADI is useful to predict the efficacy of physiological pacemaker implantation.     

AAIR Versus DDDR Pacing in Patients with Impaired Sinus Node Chronotropy: An Echocardiographic and Cardiopulmonary Study

The aim of this study was to compare AAIR and DDDR pacing at rest and during exercise. We studied 15 patients (10 men, age 65 ± 6 years) who had been paced for at least 3 months with activity sensor rate modulated dual chamber pacemakers. All had sick sinus syndrome (SSS) with impaired sinus node chronotropy. The patients underwent a resting echocardiographic evaluation of systolic and diastolic LV function at 60 beats/min during AAIR and DDDR pacing with an AV delay, which ensured complete ventricular activation capture. Cardiac output (CO) was also measured during pacing at 100 beats/min in both pacing modes. Subsequently, the oxygen consumption (VO₂at) and VO₂at pulse at the anaerobic threshold were measured during exercise in AAIR mode and in DDDR mode with an AV delay of 120 ms. The indices of diastolic function showed no significant differences between the two pacing modes, except for patients with a stimulus-R interval > 220 ms, for whom the time velocity integral of LV filling and LV inflow time were significantly lower under AAI than under DDD pacing. At 60 beats/min, CO was higher under AAI than under DDD mode only when the stimulus-R interval was below 220 ms. For stimulus-R intervals longer than 220 ms, and also during pacing at 100 beats/min, the CO was higher in DDD mode. The stimulus-R interval decreased in all patients during exercise. The time to anaerobic threshold, VO₂at ond VO₂at pulse showed no significant differences between the two pacing modes. Our results indicate that, at rest, although AAIR pacing does not improve diastolic function in patients with SSS, it maintains a higher CO than does DDDR pacing in cases where the stimulus-R interval is not excessively prolonged. On exertion, the two pacing modes appear to be equally effective, at least in cases where the stimulus-R interval decreases in AAIR mode.     

A New Principle of Rate Adaptive Pacing in Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome

The most "natural" rate adaptive pacemaker is VDD for patients with AV block. Nothing equivalent exists for patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Even if they are paced in the AAI mode, the AV synchrony is often lost under exercise if nodal rhythms develop which cause the atria to contract against closed valves by retrograde conduction. We tried to develop a concept of rate adaptive pacing which is applicable in SSS patients by guaranteeing AV synchrony. It is known that AV delay shortens with increasing rate under exercise in normal subjects. Three AAI paced patients were evaluated to find out whether a similar correlation is valid between exercise and AV delay with constant rate. A nonconventional ECG was registered during the whole procedure by using an analog tape recorder. The pacing rate was changed with and without exercise on a bicycle to determine its influence on AV delay and by calculating the AV delay averaged over the last 8 beats. In all three patients a reproducible correlation existed between exercise and shortening of the AV delay. This effect was already detectable after 10 s. Increasing the pacing rate above "physiological" rates caused prolongation of the AV delay (over-stimulation phenomenon). We, therefore, concluded that measuring the AV delay in atrial paced patients with SSS by means of a ventricular electrode can be used as a fast parameter for rate adaptive pacing with AV synchrony. The "over-stimulation" phenomenon can additionally be utilized for controlling "physiological" rates depending on individual needs.     

Atrial Fibrillation and Embolic Complications in Paced Patients

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and thromboembolism are discussed to he complications of the WI mode. We reinvestigated the spontaneous ECG and the anamnesis of 246 pacemaker patients with the indications second and third degree atrioventricular block (AV block, n = III), sick sinus syndrome (SSS, n - 101) and other indications (n = 34), all had shown sinus rhythm at implantation. The mean implantation time was 63 ± 45 months (203 VVI and 43 dual chamber pacemkers). The results: (1) Atrial fibrillation was found in 63 patients (26%). Only one of them had a DDD pacemaker inserted, the implantation time of dual chamber devices being shorter, however, (2) The incidence of AF in patients with SSS (37%) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in patients with AV block (19%). (3) Three patients suffered from strokes or transitory ischemic attacks in the follow-up, only one of them had AF at control. Conclusions: Our results confirm that VVI stimulation favors AF long-term which is most likely due to irritation of the atrial rhythm by retrograde conduction. In our patients the incidence of thromboembolic complications was not higher in the group of patients with AF. However, from this study in surviving patients, we cannot exclude that we Jost some patients due to severe stroke.     

Atrioventricular and Ventriculo-Atrial Conduction in Patients with Symptomatic Sinus Node Dysfunction

In 14 patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction—sinus bradycardia, sino-atrial exit block, or sinus arrest—electrophysiological studies were performed before implantation of a pacemaker. In 8 patients incremented high right atrial pacing showed AV-nodal Wenckebach at pacing rates equal to or above 130/min (group I); in 6 patients AV-nodal Wenckebach was reached at pacing rates Jess than 130/min (group II). During ventricular pacing at a rate 10–15% faster than the existing sinus rate, ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction was present in all patients of group I, while VA conduction was present in only 2 patients of group II (p < 0.05). Patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction but with intact AV conduction frequency show VA conduction during ventricular pacing and thus are particularly at risk for developing a pacemaker syndrome when a ventricular demand (VVI) pacemaker is implanted. This complication can be avoided by atrial demand (AAI) pacing or A V sequential (DVI) pacing. When adequate experience has been gathered with A V universel (DDD) pacemakers, the indications for selection of a pacemaker in patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction will probably change.     

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Single Lead VDD Stimulation

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term results of a single lead VDD pacing system (Phymos MPS) in 85 patients (48 males, 37 females, mean age 74 ± 9 years). The system, which incorporates two atrial floating electrodes (Phymos 830-S). was implanted for second- or third-degree Mobitz II AV block. The percentage of AV synchronized pacing, the presence of fusion beats due to short AV delay, and the occurrence of supraventricuiar arrhythmias was evaluated by Holter monitoring at 6-month intervals. Over a mean period of follow-up of 44 months (range 2–56), over 90% of AV synchronized pacing events were noted in 74 patients (87%). The presence of persistent fusion beats was detected in 12 patients (14%). In ten patients the pacemaker was reprogrammed to VVI mode for supraventricuiar arrhythmias (7 patients, 8.2%) or unsatisfactory atrial sensing (3 patients, 3.5%). One pacemaker was removed for pocket infection and two for battery depletion. These observations support the use of VDD single lead pacing to combine a physiological mode of stimulation with simple implantation techniques.     

Is Chronic Atrial Stimulation a Reliable Method for Single Chamber Pacing in Sick Sinus Syndrome?

To evaluate the feasibility of chronic atrial pacing (AAI) in sick sinus syndrome (SSS), 22 patients (pts) with bradytachycardia syndrome (BTS) and 17 patients with only bradyarrhythmias (BA) were studied on the incidence of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) and occurring AV block. A scoring system based on symptoms of SVT was developed (grade 0–5). All patients had proven normal AV conduction before PM implantation. In the BTS-group, nine patients (41%) had symptomatic SVT at the end of follow-up (mean 53 months), despite drug therapy. These patients had a high SVT score on entry (mean 3.2). High degree AV block occurred in three patients. Although in the BA-group SVT arose in six patients (35%), there was only one symptomatic patient at the end of follow-up (mean 36 months). In this group, only one patient developed high degree AV block. Atrial stimulation should be considered as a reliable therapy in patients with SSS and low SVT score before PM implantation when normal AV conduction is present.