Living donor liver transplantation for noncirrhotic inheritable metabolic liver diseases: impact of the use of heterozygous donors

BACKGROUND: In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the liver donor is almost always a blood relative; therefore, the donor is sometimes a heterozygous carrier of inheritable diseases. The use of such carriers as donors has not been validated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of LDLT for noncirrhotic inheritable metabolic liver disease (NCIMLD) to clarify the effects of using a heterozygous carrier as a donor. METHODS: Between June 1990 and December 2003, 21 patients with NCIMLD underwent LDLT at our institution. The indications for LDLT included type II citrullinemia (n = 7), ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (n = 6), propionic acidemia (n = 3), Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I (n = 2), methylmalonic acidemia (n = 2), and familial amyloid polyneuropathy (n = 1). Of these 21 recipients, six underwent auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation. RESULTS: The cumulative survival rate of the recipients was 85.7% at both 1 and 5 years after operation. All surviving recipients are currently doing well without sequelae of the original diseases, including neurological impairments or physical growth retardation. Twelve of the 21 donors were considered to be heterozygous carriers based on the modes of inheritance of the recipients' diseases and preoperative donor medical examinations. All donors were uneventfully discharged from the hospital and have been doing well since discharge. No mortality or morbidity related to the use of heterozygous donors was observed in donors or recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the use of heterozygous donors in LDLT for NCIMLD has no negative impact on either donors or recipients, although some issues remain unsolved and should be evaluated in further studies.     

Living donor liver transplantation in Egypt

In Egypt there is no doubt that chronic liver diseases are a major health concern. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence among the 15−59 years age group is estimated to be 14.7%. The high prevalence of chronic liver diseases has led to increasing numbers of Egyptian patients suffering from end stage liver disease (ESLD), necessitating liver transplantation (LT). We reviewed the evolution of LT in Egypt and the current status. A single center was chosen as an example to review the survival and mortality rates. To date, deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has not been implemented in any program though Egyptian Parliament approved the law in 2010. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) seemed to be the only logical choice to save many patients who are in desperate need for LT. By that time, there was increase in number of centers doing LDLT (13 centers) and increase in number of LDLT cases [2,400] with improvement of the results. Donor mortality rate is 1.66 per 1,000 donors; this comprised four donors in the Egyptian series. The exact recipient survival is not accurately known however, and the one-year, three-year and five-year survival were 73.17%, 70.83% and 64.16% respectively in the International Medical Center (IMC) in a series of 145 adult to adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT) cases. There was no donor mortality in this series. LDLT are now routinely and successfully performed in Egypt with reasonable donor and recipient outcomes. Organ shortage remains the biggest hurdle facing the increasing need for LT. Although LDLT had reasonable outcomes, it carries considerable risks to healthy donors. For example, it lacks cadaveric back up, and is not feasible for all patients. The initial success in LDLT should drive efforts to increase the people awareness about deceased organ donation in Egypt.     

Expanding the living liver donor pool in countries having limited deceased donor activity: Pakistani perspective

Over the last decades, liver transplantation (LT) has evolved into a life-saving procedure. Due to limited deceased donor activities in the eastern world, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) had flourished tremendously in most Asian countries. Yet, these LDLT activities fall short of meeting the expected demands. Pakistan, a developing country, bears a major burden of liver diseases. Currently, only few centers offer LDLT services in the country. On the other hand, deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) activities have not started due to social, cultural, and religious beliefs. Various strategies can be adopted successfully to overcome the scarcity of live liver donors (LLDs) and to expand the donor pool, keeping in view donor safety and recipient outcome. These include consideration of LLDs with underlying clinical conditions like G6PD deficiency and Hepatitis B core positivity. Extended donor criteria can also be utilized and relaxation can be made in various donors' parameters including upper age and body mass index after approval from the multidisciplinary board. Also, left lobe grafts, grafts with various anatomical variations, and a low graft-to-recipient ratio can be considered in appropriate situations. ABO-incompatible LT and donor swapping at times may help in expanding the LLDs pool. Similarly, legislation is needed to allow live non-blood-related donors for organ donations. Finally, community education and awareness through various social media flat forms are needed to promote deceased organ donation.     

Recent Advance in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)has been performed in more than 2000 cases around the world. This procedure is considered to have certain advantages over cadaveric liver transplantation, because detailed preoperative evaluation of the donor liver is possible and superior graft quality is available. The indication has recently been widened to include adult patients. The results of LDLT have been reported to be very good. In this article,several considerations on LDLT,including living donor selection and application to adult patients, are discussed. Between June 1990 and March 2001, 143 patients underwent LDLT at Shinshu University Hospital. During this period, 160 patients were determined to be candidates for liver transplantation in our institution, and 185 candidates were evaluated as potential donors for these patients. Thirty-eight of 185 donor candidates were excluded for reasons including liver dysfunction and withdrawal of consent. The recipients included 60 adults, 50 (83%) of whom are currently alive. Taking into account the worldwide shortage of cadaveric organ donation,the importance of LDLT will probably never diminish. This procedure should be established on the basis of profound consideration of donor safety as well as accumulated expertise of hepatobiliary surgery.     

Current status of organ transplantation in Japan and worldwide

Recent advances in immunosuppressant therapy have dramatically reduced the frequency of acute rejection of organ transplants. Subsequently, the short-term graft survival rate has been improved, and ABO blood type-incompatible and existing anti-HLA antibody-positive kidney transplantation has been enabled, which has increased the availability of living kidney donors. Japan has a unique history and strategies of liver transplantation (LT) for various liver diseases. The outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Japan is comparable to that of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Western countries despite the relatively short history of LT. The main disadvantage of LT in Japan is donor shortage mainly due to the small number of available deceased donors. There are some disadvantages with LDLT in autoimmune liver diseases because of the dependence on blood relative donors. The first brain-dead pancreas transplantation (PTx) was performed in 2000. Since that time, 42 brain-dead PTx, 2 non-heart beating PTx, and 14 living donor PTx had been performed by the end of 2007. One of the 44 recipients of deceased donor PTx died of unknown causes 11 months after transplantation. Although most of the deceased donors in Japan were marginal and their condition was not favorable, the results of these cases were comparable to those of Western countries. Fourteen intestinal transplantations (ITx) had been performed by the end of 2007 in four transplant centers. There were 3 deceased donor and 11 live donor transplants. The original diseases included short bowel syndrome (n = 6), intestinal function disorder (n = 6), and retransplantation (n = 2). The graft and patient survival rate are 60% and 69%, respectively. Eight recipients survived and stopped parenteral nutrition with full-functioning grafts. Amendment of the Japanese law for the utilization of deceased donors should increase the number available donors in the future.     

Safety of donor in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft

BACKGROUND: The growing gap between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and available organs has continued to be the primary issue facing the transplant community. To overcome the waiting list mortality, living donor liver transplantation has become an option, in which the greatest concern is the safety of the donor, especially in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT) using a right lobe liver graft. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of donors after right lobe liver donation for A-A LDLT performed in our center. METHODS: From January 2002 to March 2006, 26 patients underwent A-A LDLT using right lobe liver grafts in our center. Seven donors were men and 19 were women (range, 19-65 years; median age, 38 years). The right lobe liver grafts were obtained by transecting the liver on the right side of the middle hepatic vein without interrupting the vascular blood flow. The mean follow-up time for these donors was 9 months. RESULTS: These donor residual liver volumes ranged from 30.5% to 60.3%. We did not experience any donor mortality. Two cases (7.69%) experienced major complications: intra-abdominal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis in one each and three (11.54%), minor ones: wound steatosis in two, and transient chyle leak in one. All donors were fully recovered and returned to their previous occupations. CONCLUSIONS: A-A LDLT using a right lobe liver graft has become a standard option. The donation of right lobe liver for A-A LDLT was a relatively safe procedure in our center.     

成人间双供体活体肝脏移植成功2例报告

目的供肝短缺是影响肝脏移植发展的主要因素之一，活体供肝是解决这一矛盾的重要措施，供者提供足够的肝脏是影响活体肝脏移植的重要因素。方法施行成人间双供体活体肝移植2例，1例由受者的两位姐姐分别提供左半肝作为供肝，另1例由受者母亲提供右半肝，由无心跳供者提供左半肝(采用劈裂方式，其另一部分肝脏同时为另一成人受者实施肝脏移植)作为供肝。结果术后供、受者肝功能均恢复良好。结论成人问双供肝活体肝脏移植可以为受者提供更大重量的肝脏，又可减少供者提供较多肝脏所带来的风险；双供肝一受者肝脏移植手术操作复杂。     

Two cases of central venous catheter‐related thrombosis in living liver donors: how can the risk be minimized?

Abstract:  A central venous catheter (CVC) is commonly used for intraoperative management by anesthetists and surgeons during major operations, including donor operations for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), in which donor safety is of utmost importance. Reasons for use of CVC for donors include measurement of central venous pressure and drug infusion when necessary. A potentially serious complication of a major operation is pulmonary thromboembolism. We report two cases of LDLT donors complicated by catheter related thrombosis (CRT) of the jugular vein, who were eventually discharged without long-term complications. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report of CRT among LDLT donor population. In this report, in order to minimize the risks related to CRT in LDLT donors, we propose thorough screening for thrombophilic disorders, use of a silicone or polyurethane double-lumen CVC as thin as possible, placement of the tip of the CVC at the superior vena cava via the right jugular vein using ultrasonography as a guide for puncture, and removal of the catheter at the end of the operation based on our experience of CRT among LDLT donors.     

The challenge of finding donors for living donor liver transplantation in Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION: Organ shortage remains the main limiting factor for expanding liver transplantation (LT) in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was recently undertaken by our team at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC), in an effort to meet the increasing demand for LT in Saudi Arabia. OBJECTIVE: Analysis of donors assessed for LDLT at KFSH&RC. METHODS: Between September 2002 and May 2003, 39 potential donors were assessed for LDLT. First- or second-degree relationship to the recipient was an essential precondition. Assessment included biochemical testing, radiological studies (computed tomography: magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography), and thorough psychosocial analysis. Liver biopsy and hepatic angiogram was performed in some but not all donors. RESULTS: Male:female ratio was 28:11. Median age was 27 (18 to 34). Of 39 potential donors, only three underwent LDLT. The remaining 36 were rejected for different reasons including: psychosocial in 8 (20.5%), fatty liver in 7 (17.9%), recipient issues in 6 (15.4%), refusal after initial approval in 3 (7.7%), unfavorable anatomy in 2 (5.1%), inadequate liver volume in 2 (5.1%), abnormal liver functions in 2 (5.1%), hepatitis C virus in 2 (5.1%), liver pathology in 1 (2.6%), and other medical concerns in remaining 3 donors (7.7%). CONCLUSION: In Saudi Arabia, donor availability as well as recipient characteristics may limit the value of LDLT in overcoming organ shortage. Therefore, efforts should be directed to improve the number and quality of available cadaveric organs. Until then, LDLT may be the only way forward to save patients from dying on the waiting list.     

Psychosomatische Aspekte der Leberlebendspende

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers the option to reduce organ scarcity and thereby waiting list mortality. The crucial ethical problem of LDLT is the fact that the well being of a donor is being jeopardized for the improvement of quality of life of the recipient. To preserve mental health of the donors, psychosomatic evaluation should be conducted including examination of the coping capacity, the mental stability of the donor and the voluntary nature of the donation. Thus a comprehensive disclosure of information to donors is necessary. Realistic outcome expectations, family relationships without extreme conflicts, sufficient autonomy of the donor-recipient relationship and social and familiar support are predictors facilitating a favorable psychosocial outcome for the donor. Before and after LDLT the health-related quality of life of the donors is similar or increased in comparison to the general population. Psychiatric complications following LDLT can occur in 13% of the donors. Female donors, donors who have surgical complications themselves and donors with unrealistic outcome expectations should be given psychotherapeutic support before they are admitted to living liver donation. Urgent indications in the case of acute liver failure and the donation by adult children for their parents are particular stress factors. For the safety of the donor, these combinations should be avoided whenever possible.     

Donor graft does not affect the P450 2C19 genotype expressed in peripheral blood in recipients of living donor liver transplantation

Chiu K‐W, Tai W‐C, Nakano T, Tseng H‐P, Cheng Y‐F, Jawan B, Goto S, Chen C‐L. Donor graft does not affect the P450 2C19 genotype expressed in peripheral blood in recipients of living donor liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 830–834. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The function of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is altered in patients with end‐stage liver disease (ESLD) that require liver transplantation (LT). The status of CYP2C19 is of considerable interest because the transplanted healthy donor livers are perfused with the blood of the recipient with ESLD. This study aims to clarify the changes in CYP2C19 in the peripheral blood before and after LT. Thirty pairs of living donors and recipients were enrolled in this study. The CYP2C19 genotype in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was studied immediately before operation in donors, on the day preceding the operation in the unstable recipients, and one month after LT in stable recipients. Limited data suggest that the post‐LT genotype in liver biopsy is the same as donor’s original genotype in most cases (80.0%) and that only 2 patients in the study cohort had the same liver tissue genotype as the respective recipient PBMCs. However, expression of the CYP2C19 genotype after living donor LT (LDLT) was identical to pre‐transplant expression in 100% (30/30) of recipients, i.e., CYP2C19 genotypes in recipient PBMCs did not change after LDLT, suggesting that the donor liver did not render any mutations to the CYP2C19 genotypes after LT.     

Psychological strain in urgent indications for living donor liver transplantation.

The ethical soundness of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in urgent indications is still under discussion. The aim of the survey was to investigate the psychological distress of donors in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or acute liver failure (ALF). In a prospective multicenter study (n = 123), health-related quality of life (QOL), anxiety, and depression were measured. The psychological distress of donors was correlated to the degree of urgency of the recipients' indication, which was classified as nonurgent, HCC, or ALF. During the donor evaluation prior to LDLT, the donors with recipients for HCC and ALF demonstrated significantly reduced mental QOL in comparison to donors for a nonurgent indication and to the German normative sample. Compared to healthy controls, anxiety and depression were significantly increased in donors for ALF. Three months after the transplantation, scores for mental QOL as well as for anxiety and depression improved and were within the normal range for the whole group as well as for the ALF donors. In conclusion, the psychological burden was temporary in nature. Our findings can be considered as arguments for the current practice to address family members as donors in cases of HCC and ALF.     

活体肝移植供体手术及术后管理（附22例临床分析）

目的 探讨提高活体肝移植供体手术安全性和加强术后管理的措施。方法 回顾性分析北京大学人民医院2003年2月至2009年6月22例活体肝移植供体的临床资料,总结供体术前评估、手术技术、术后并发症及随访情况。结果 术前对供体进行三步法评估,术中采用超吸刀 （CUSA）进行肝脏实质分离,术后定期随访。供肝移植物包括肝左外叶2例、左半肝6例、扩大左半肝1例、右半肝5例和扩大右半肝8例。1例在术后早期出现腹腔内出血,1例合并胸水,1例枕后皮下血肿,其他供体未出现严重并发症,术后肝功能迅速恢复正常,随访至今无供体死亡。结论 活体肝移植供体手术复杂,严格术前评估,术中精细操作,术后加强随访是提高活体肝移植供体安全的重要保证。     

Living liver donation: preoperative assessment,anatomic considerations,and long-term outcome

BACKGROUND: A major prerequisite for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) as an acceptable treatment modality is thoughtful consideration of the donor. However, there has been no comprehensive audit of living liver donation focusing on issues such as donor selection, anatomic surveys, and long-term outcome. METHODS: Between June 1990 and January 2002 at our institution, 160 LDLTs were performed and 177 patients were referred for LDLT. For these patients, a total of 203 potential donors were screened. The process of donor selection, safety of donor hepatectomy, and postoperative morbidity were investigated. Additionally, an anonymous questionnaire was administered to 100 donors who had undergone LDLT more than 3 years previously. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (19%) of the 203 donor candidates were excluded. Precise estimation of the hepatic anatomy was indispensable for donor safety. None of the donors showed prolonged postoperative liver dysfunction nor developed complications requiring reoperation or readmission. There was no donor mortality. The responses to the questionnaire indicated that 95% of the living donors had not felt coerced to donate and that 5% were neutral about coercion pressure. There were no severe postoperative aftereffects, but minor problems were reported by 51% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Our appraisal of the perioperative and long-term postoperative course of LDLT donors revealed that although most donors are satisfied after undergoing LDLT, there is a need for strict attention to the process of donor selection and long-term postoperative follow-up. The outcome of the present series seems to confirm the safety of donor hepatectomy.     

Donor outcomes in right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation: single-center experience in Egypt

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an alternative source of organs for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) in absence of deceased donor LT. In LDLT the greatest concern is donor safety. Our objective was to evaluate the outcome of donors after right lobe liver donation in a single LT center in Egypt. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty LDL resections were performed from 2001 to 2004. The mean donor age was 29.2 +/- 6.4 years. Residual liver volume was 41.1 +/- 4.5%. Mean operative time was 560 +/- 62.2 minutes; mean ICU stay, less than 24 hours; mean hospital stay, 15.4 +/- 7.7 days; and mean follow-up period, 6 months. RESULTS: There was no mortality. The overall complication rate was 68% (34 donors). Major complications included intraoperative bleeding in one, biliary leak in two, and pneumonia in three donors. Minor complications included mild pleural effusion in 13 donors, transient ascites in 10, mild depression in 7, intra-abdominal collections in 3, and wound infections in 1 donor. Residual liver volume did not affect the complication rate. None required reoperation. Return to predonation activity occurred within 6 to 8 weeks. No liver impairment occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Right lobe adult LDLT is a safe procedure with regard to donor outcome. Major complications occurred in only 10% of our series.     

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using left lobes: the importance of surgical modulations on portal graft inflow

BACKGROUND: Due to the shortage of available cadaveric organs, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been recently applied extensively in adults. The use of the left lobe should be encouraged because of donor safety, but frequently the metabolic requirements of severely cirrhotic patients are great and subsequent graft dysfunction is encountered after transplantation. The importance of increased portal inflow to the graft in previously severely cirrhotic patients and other hemodynamic changes in LDLT using left lobes are still under debate, as are the surgical modulations to correct them. In this study, we have reported an initial series of adult-to-adult LDLT using left lobes, underlining the hemodynamic changes encountered during the transplant and the surgical modulations we applied to correct them. METHODS: Eight adult recipients underwent left lobe liver transplantation from living donors. Portal vein pressure and central venous pressure were measured before and after surgical modulation. RESULTS: We encountered four cases of small-for-size syndrome. Two patients were retransplanted; the other two died. Seventy-five percent of our recipients survived and 50% did not require further surgery. CONCLUSION: Surgical portal inflow modulation should be considered in cases of left lobe liver transplantation between adults.     

The first two cases of living donor liver transplantation using dual grafts in Europe.

The major limitation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an adequate graft size with special regard to the safety of the donor. Only 20% of the evaluated donors are suitable to donate the right liver, depending mainly on the critical remnant liver volume. We report 2 cases of adult-to-adult LDLT using dual grafts. In the first case we implanted a left lateral lobe together with a left lobe; in the second case we used a left lateral and a right lobe. Dual graft LDLT solves the problem of graft-size insufficiency and avoids critical right lobectomy in the donor. This procedure can be safely performed and opens up the possibility of LDLT to even more families in the Western world.     

Liver transplantation from living donors with Gilbert's syndrome is a safe procedure for both donors and recipients

Liver transplantation (LT) has become a favorable therapeutic option for patients with end‐stage liver diseases. Gilbert's syndrome (GS) is a benign condition characterized by intermittent mild jaundice due to unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. It is not obvious whether living‐donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from a donor with GS could result in a normal outcome for both the recipient and the donor. We aimed to determine whether right lobe hepatectomy is a safe procedure for living donors with GS and LT recipients. Between September 2011 and March 2015, 305 LDLT procedures using right lobe grafts were performed at Atasehir Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Nineteen of 305 LT candidates who had been diagnosed with GS were included in the current study. After a 12‐h overnight fast, total and indirect bilirubin levels of donors and recipients were measured. The median follow‐up after transplant was 16 months (range 3–36 months). The median age of donors was 25 (range 20–55 yr). Four donors (21%) were female, and 15 donors (89%) were male. The median age of donors was 51 (range 23–68 yr). Eleven recipients (57%) were female, and 8 (43%) were male. The median preoperative total bilirubin level of donors was 1.69 mg/dL (range 1.26–2.43 mg/dL) (normal range <1.2 mg/dL). The median total bilirubin level of donors on postoperative day 7 was 1.04 mg/dL (range 0.71–3.23 mg/dL). As our study has included a large number of donors with GS, it produced reliable evidence that right lobe hepatectomy is a safe procedure for living donors with GS and LT recipients.     

活体肝移植进展与展望（2000-2020）

活体肝移植比公民逝世后器官捐献肝移植操作更为复杂，围手术期评估及技术实施直接影响供体安全和受体预后。目前，行活体肝移植时，供体选择应遵循“自愿、知情、无害”伦理原则，利用影像学评估供肝质量、解剖结构及残肝体积；受体选择时优先考虑良性终末期肝病病人，而选择肝癌病人应考虑肿瘤分期；移植物选择应满足不同受体的“移植物-受体重量比”标准，对于<3岁的儿童，其比值在2%~4%为宜；在传统开放手术供肝获取经验基础上，腹腔镜供肝获取技术发展与挑战并存；术中各管道重建时，管道条件、匹配程度及通畅性是移植技术的关键；供受体血型不相容时，应用利妥昔单抗可起到减少并发症及改善预后作用；术后精细化管理，尽量减少免疫抑制剂用量以期减少其药物相关副反应。尽管存在诸多问题，相信随着外科技术的进步，医生对肝脏解剖认识的加深及移植物再生血流动力学的理解，活体肝移植技术会更加完备、更加安全。作为公民逝世后器官捐献肝移植的重要补充，活体肝移植将为更多终末期肝病病人提供有效治疗手段。     

Preoperative imaging evaluation of potential living liver donors: reasons for exclusion from donation in adult living donor liver transplantation

Accurate pretransplant evaluation of a potential donor in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is essential in preventing postoperative liver failure and optimizing safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the reasons for exclusion from donation of potential donors in adult LDLT. From September 2003 to June 2006, 266 potential donors were evaluated for 215 recipients: 220 potential donors for 176 adult recipients; 46 for 39 pediatric recipients. Imaging modalities including Doppler ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography provided vascular evaluation and MR cholangiopancreatography to evaluate biliary anatomy. Calculation of liver volume and assessment of steatosis were performed by enhanced and nonenhanced CT, respectively. In the adult group, only 83 (37.7%) potential donors were considered suitable for LDLT. Of the 137 unsuitable potential donors, 36 (26.2%) candidates were canceled because of recipient issues that included death of 15 recipients (10.9%), main portal vein thrombosis (8%), recipient condition beyond surgery (5%), and no indication for liver transplantation due to disease improvement (2%). The remaining 101 (73.8%) candidates who were excluded included steatosis (27.7%), an inadequate remnant volume (57.4%), small-for-size graft (8.9%), HLA-homozygous donor leading to one-way donor-recipient HLA match (3%), psychosocial problems (4%), as well as variations of hepatic artery (4%), portal vein (1%), and biliary system anatomy (5%). Anatomic considerations were not the main reason for exclusion of potential donors. An inadequate remnant liver volume (<30%) is the crucial point for the adult LDLT decision.