Safety of donor in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft

BACKGROUND: The growing gap between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and available organs has continued to be the primary issue facing the transplant community. To overcome the waiting list mortality, living donor liver transplantation has become an option, in which the greatest concern is the safety of the donor, especially in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT) using a right lobe liver graft. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of donors after right lobe liver donation for A-A LDLT performed in our center. METHODS: From January 2002 to March 2006, 26 patients underwent A-A LDLT using right lobe liver grafts in our center. Seven donors were men and 19 were women (range, 19-65 years; median age, 38 years). The right lobe liver grafts were obtained by transecting the liver on the right side of the middle hepatic vein without interrupting the vascular blood flow. The mean follow-up time for these donors was 9 months. RESULTS: These donor residual liver volumes ranged from 30.5% to 60.3%. We did not experience any donor mortality. Two cases (7.69%) experienced major complications: intra-abdominal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis in one each and three (11.54%), minor ones: wound steatosis in two, and transient chyle leak in one. All donors were fully recovered and returned to their previous occupations. CONCLUSIONS: A-A LDLT using a right lobe liver graft has become a standard option. The donation of right lobe liver for A-A LDLT was a relatively safe procedure in our center.     

Live donor liver transplantation in adults

Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was initiated in 1988 for children recipients. Its application to adult recipients was limited by graft size until the first right liver LDLT was performed in Hong Kong in 1996. Since then, right liver graft has become the major graft type. Despite rapid adoption of LDLT by many centers, many controversies on donor selection, indications, techniques, and ethics exist. With the recent known 11 donor deaths around the world, transplant surgeons are even more cautious than the past in the evaluation and selection of donors. The need for routine liver biopsy in donor evaluation is arguable but more and more centers opt for a policy of liberal liver biopsy. Donation of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the right liver graft was considered unsafe but now data indicate that the outcome of donors with or without MHV donation is about equal. Right liver LDLT has been shown to improve the overall survival rate of patients with chronic liver disease, acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma waiting for liver transplantation. The outcome of LDLT is equivalent to deceased donor liver transplantation despite a smaller graft size and higher technical complexity.     

Selection of liver-transplant candidates for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation as the only surgical option for end-stage liver disease.

The selection of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients in regions where deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is rarely performed might be different from that in other centers at which LDLT is an alternative option to DDLT. Records of adult (age > or = 18 yr) patients referred to our center were reviewed to analyze the selection process of LDLT candidates. Among the 533 LDLT candidates, 165 (31%) were rejected due to recipient issues. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the most common reason for rejection (n = 55). Among the remaining recipients, 120 patients (22%) were rejected due to donor issues. LDLT was eventually performed in 249 (47%) of the evaluated recipients. There are few options for candidates who are unable to find live donors in regions where DDLT is unrealistic. A more effective and precise approach to recipient and donor evaluation should be pursued.     

Preliminary experience with living donor liver transplantation in adults and children

INTRODUCTION: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is becoming a widespread technique with good results. Its use may sharply decrease waiting list mortality. However, donor safety is of primary concern. The aim of this work was the preliminary evaluation of the LDLT program initiated in our institution in 1995. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 875 liver transplants (LT) performed from 1986 12 are LDLT in nine adults (50.0+/-10.0 years) and three children (1.9+/-1.1 years). All donors were relatives: son/daughter (six), brother (three), and father/mother (three). RESULTS: Donor right lobe graft weight was 758.3+/-137.4 g; left liver 525.3+/-97.1 g; and left lobe 293.3+/-30.5 g, with a graft weight/recipient weight ratio of 0.91+/-0.21 (0.64-1.36) in adults. Complications in five donors (42%) included biliary fistula in the first three cases, two pleural effusions and one intra-abdominal collection. Mean hospital stay was 16.9+/-15.2 days (median 12). Recipient indications for adults were: four HCV cirrhosis (+ alcoholic in one), one HBV cirrhosis, one cryptogenic, one alcoholic, one PBC, and one retransplant due to cholangiopathy. In children, the etiologies were two biliary atresia and one liver fibrosis. The first case was the only mortality (8.3%). Two patients were retransplanted (16.6%) due to arterial thrombosis (AT) and graft dysfunction. Actuarial survival at 1 year was 91.7%+/-8.0% for patients and 83.3%+/-10.8% for grafts. Complications in the recipients included AT (two), Acinetobacter sepsis, jaundice and upper digestive hemorrhage (due to a "small-for-size" graft), biliary fistula after T-tube removal, volvulus around the T tube, and intra-abdominal collection. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that good results can be achieved with LDLT. Standardization of the technique will allow refinement of the operation and decrease waiting list mortality. However, donor safety remains a fearful threat.     

Toward 300 liver transplants a year

The technical success of cadaveric whole-size liver transplantation and better immunosuppressive drugs has extended the application of this life-saving procedure to include patients with irreversible acute and chronic liver diseases. However, because of the scarcity of cadaveric liver grafts, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as an alternative to cadaveric-donor liver transplantation (CDLT), especially in Asia. In Korea, 8% of the population are hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers, and the resultant HBV cirrhosis, with or without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is common in the 40- to 60-year-old generation. Accordingly, many patients require orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In 1992, we started performing CDLTs in the Asan Medical Center. In 1994, the first successful pediatric LDLT was performed in Korea, on a 9-monthold infant with biliary atresia. In 1997, the first successful adult LDLT was performed in our department, using a left lobe, on a 37-year-old patient with HBV cirrhosis associated with HCC. Even after the first successful right-lobe LDLT, we faced the obstacle of anterior segment congestion of a right-lobe graft, and initiated reconstruction of the middle hepatic venous tributaries of a right-lobe graft in 1998. In 1999, we performed more than 100 OLTs a year. Insufficient graft size has hindered the expansion of adult LDLT, when the remaining left-lobe of potential donors is too small to assure donor safety. Dual two-left-lobe graft LDLT (transplanting from two donors into one recipient) was developed in 2000 to solve graft-size insufficiency and minimize donor risk. More than 200 OLTs a year have been performed since 2004, while broadening the indications for adult LDLT to near complete obstruction of the portal vein, with the application of intraoperative portography (IOP) and portal vein stenting. In 2007, 320 LTs were performed, including 276 adult LDLTs, 10 pediatric LDLTs, and 34 CDLTs (including 7 adult and 1 pediatric split-liver transplant). There has been no donor mortality in LDLT. With technical refinement and advanced perioperative care, the in-hospital mortality of recipients has dropped to 4%: attributed to the dedication of our liver transplantation team members.     

Clinical outcomes of living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients

BACKGROUND: Whether hepatitis C virus recurrence occurs earlier and with greater severity for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) than for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) has recently become a subject of debate. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes for a cohort of 91 HCV-positive patients who underwent LDLT at Kyoto University with a median follow-up period of 25 months. RESULTS: Overall 5-year patient survival for HCV patients was similar to that for non-HCV patients (n=209) who underwent right-lobe LDLT at our institute (69% vs. 71%). Survival rate of patients without HCC (n=34) tended to be better than that of patients with HCC (n=57) (82% vs. 60%, P=0.069). According to annual liver biopsy, rate of fibrosis progression to stage 2 or more (representing significant fibrosis) was 39% at 2 years after LDLT. Univariate analysis showed that female recipient and male donor represented significant risk factors for significant fibrosis. Progression to severe recurrence (defined as the presence of liver cirrhosis (F4) in a liver biopsy and/or the development of clinical decompensation) was observed in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative patient survival was similar for HCV-positive and -negative recipients in our adult LDLT series. Rates of progression to severe disease due to HCV recurrence seemed comparable between our LDLT recipients and DDLT recipients described in the literature. Although longer-term follow-up is required, our results suggest that LDLT can produce acceptable outcomes also for patients suffering from HCV-related cirrhosis.     

Microsurgical reconstruction of hepatic artery during living donor liver transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become a well-recognized treatment modality for patients with end-stage liver disease. Arterial reconstruction during LDLT is perhaps the most important aspect of the grafting procedure. Although microsurgical hepatic artery reconstruction has become the essential technique in LDLT, it poses significant challenges even to experienced microsurgeons. In this report, the experiences of 155 microsurgical reconstructions of the hepatic artery in 150 LDLTs were reviewed, and the problems that were encountered and the solutions are discussed. From June 1999-March 2004 150 LDLTs were performed on 148 recipients at Ege University Organ Transplantation and Research Center. Hepatic arterial thrombosis was encountered in 3 patients. Microsurgical technique has overcome the difficulties in LDLT. This has increased liver transplantations in the presence of limited cadaver grafts and has decreased the patient mortality in the waiting list.     

Technical implications of living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience

Liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease is the treatment of choice in current surgical practice. However, the shortage of cadaveric organs has limited this treatment option for many years. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may be an option to overcome the organ shortage. In the present series we report a single-center experience with 39 LDLT performed from March 2000 to June 2003. The main indications for LDLT was hepatitis B cirrhosis (11 patients). The recipient hepatectomy was performed with caval preservation. The hepatic vein anastomosis was performed either to recipient hepatic vein or inferior vena cava. The portal vein anastomosis was performed either to the recipient's main or right portal branch. Biliary diversion was performed to the recipient biliary ducts if possible, otherwise to a jejunal loop in Roux-en-Y fashion. The survival rate at the end of one year was 71%. The leading cause of mortality was sepsis in five patients. Biliary complications developed in 20% of the recipients. All bile leaks were from the Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Hepatic artery thrombosis was diagnosed in four patients by loss of hepatic blood flow on Doppler ultrasound. LDLT is a major surgical option for end-stage liver disease, particularly for countries with low rates of organ donation. However, there are technical challenges to be overcome such as small vessels from segmental grafts and multiple small bile ducts.     

Monosegmental living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) program has been started from 1990 in Japan, and is still major form of liver transplantation because of the scarcity of cadaveric donor organs. In small infants, implantation of left lateral segment grafts can be a problem because of a large-for-size graft. Until November 2002, we performed 867 transplants for 828 patients (561 children and 306 adults), and 14 cases received monosegment grafts from living donors. METHODS: Fifteen patients, median age 211 days, median weights 5.95 kg, received monosegmental LDLT. The indication for using this technique was infants with an estimated graft-to-recipient weight ratio of over 4.0%. RESULTS: Graft and patient survival is 85.7%. There were no differences in donor operation time and blood loss between monosegmentectomy and left lateral segmentectomy. Segment III grafts were indicated in 13 cases. Two vascular complications were observed (one hepatic artery thrombosis and one portal vein thrombosis). CONCLUSIONS: Monosegental living donor liver transplantation is a feasible option with satisfactory graft survival in small babies with liver failure.     

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center preliminary report.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with end-stage liver disease but is limited by the availability of donor organs. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) represents an alternative therapeutic option for patients with disease confined to the liver. Between April 1998 and December 2003, 537 patients underwent liver transplantation in our center. Thirty patients with HCC and associated terminal cirrhosis and 4 patients with tumor recurrence after liver resection who underwent LDLT were reviewed. Nineteen patients (55.8%) met the Milan criteria for LT, whereas 15 patients (44.2%) "exceeded" them. The overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 68% and 62%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 17-64 months). Five patients (14.7%) died in the first 30 days after LDLT. Hospital mortality was significantly correlated with age > 60 years. Four patients developed recurrence between 6 and 35 months after LDLT. Recurrence was significantly related to the presence of more than 3 tumor lesions in our series. In conclusion, LDLT is a promising treatment option for patients with HCC. Even longer follow-up and bigger patients' series are needed to fully assess the benefits of LDLT for HCC patients exceeding the Milan criteria.     

Expanding living donor liver transplantation: Report of first US living donor liver transplant chain

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) enjoys widespread use in Asia, but remains limited to a handful of centers in North America and comprises only 5% of liver transplants performed in the United States. In contrast, living donor kidney transplantation is used frequently in the United States, and has evolved to commonly include paired exchanges, particularly for ABO-incompatible pairs. Liver paired exchange (LPE) has been utilized in Asia, and was recently reported in Canada; here we report the first LPE performed in the United States, and the first LPE to be performed on consecutive days. The LPE performed at our institution was initiated by a nondirected donor who enabled the exchange for an ABO-incompatible pair, and the final recipient was selected from our deceased donor waitlist. The exchange was performed over the course of 2 consecutive days, and relied on the use and compliance of a bridge donor. Here, we show that LPE is feasible at centers with significant LDLT experience and affords an opportunity to expand LDLT in cases of ABO incompatibility or when nondirected donors arise. To our knowledge, this represents the first exchange of its kind in the United States.     

Right living donor liver transplantation: an option for adult patients: single institution experience with 74 patients

OBJECTIVE: To present an institutional experience with the use of right liver grafts in adult patients and to assess the practicability and efficacy of this procedure by analyzing the results. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for the pediatric population has gained worldwide acceptance. In the past few years, LDLT has also become feasible for adult patients due to technical evolution in hepatobiliary surgery and increased experience with reduced-size and split-liver transplants. Nevertheless, some graft losses remain unexplained and are possibly due to unrecognized venous outflow problems. METHODS: From April 1998 to September 2002, we performed 74 right LDLTs (segments 5-8). The 74 donors were selected from 474 candidates according to standard protocol. The median age of the donors was 35 years (range 18-58 years) and 51 years (range 18-64 years) in recipients. Standard and extended indications for transplantation were considered. Over the period reported, technical modifications in the bile duct anastomosis (duct-to-duct, end-to-end, or end-to-side) and a new graft implantation technique that provides maximized venous outflow, leading to outcome improvement, were developed. RESULTS: 64.9% of patients had liver cirrhosis and 35.1% had malignancy. While 44 donors (59.5%) presented an uneventful postoperative course, 27% minor (pleural effusion, pneumonia, venous thrombosis, wound infection, incisional hernia) and 13.5% major (biliary leakage, death of a donor due to unrecognized hereditary liver disease, and consecutive liver insufficiency) complications were documented. In recipients, 23% biliary complications and 6.8% hepatic artery thrombosis occurred. The overall patient and graft survival rate after 1 year was 79.4% and 75.3%, respectively. In cases with extended indication, the patient survival rate was 74% and the graft survival rate 68% at 12 months. Using technical modifications in the last 10 recipients, including 2 critically decompensated cirrhotics, the survival rate was 100% at a median follow-up of 3.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: In our transplant program, living donor liver transplantation has become a standard option in the adult patient population. The critical issue of this procedure is donor morbidity. Technical improvements in the harvesting and implantation of right grafts can also offer hope to patients with challenging forms of end-stage liver disease or malignant liver tumors.     

Progress in living donor liver transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has the capacity to reduce the current discrepancy between the number of patients on the transplant waiting list and the number of available organ donors. For pediatric patients, LDLT has clearly reduced the number of waiting list deaths, providing compelling evidence for an increase in LDLT programs. This review discusses many of the recent advances in LDLT.     

亲属活体供肝移植治疗儿童终末期肝病六例

目的 探讨亲属活体供肝移植(LDLT)治疗儿童终末期肝病的效果,并总结治疗经验.方法 2005年9月至2007年1月对6例终末期肝病患儿进行了LDLT.6例患者中,原发病为肝内外胆管弥漫性囊性扩张症Ⅳ型伴肝硬化1例、肝豆状核变性2例、门静脉海绵样变性3例;供者为患儿的母亲3例、父亲2例及舅父1例,分别切取供者的右半肝1例和左半肝5例作为供肝;在切除受者全部病肝和保留下腔静脉后,对受者施行部分供肝的原位肝移植.术后依据供、受者的临床表现、血液学指标和影像学检查,对活体供肝移植的治疗效果进行评价.结果 术后对供、受者随访了6～21个月.6例供者均健康存活,未发生并发症.6例受者中,1例于术后第4天死于门静脉血栓形成,1例于术后5个月时死于肝内静脉血栓形成,其余4例均长期健康存活.结论 亲属活体供肝移植是治疗儿童终末期肝病的有效方法.术前进行仔细的供、受者选择和完善的影像学检查,术中应用精确的手术技术,术后给予严格的管理是儿童LDLT成功的关键.     

Outcome of living donor liver transplantation for post-Kasai biliary atresia in adults.

Previous reports described the effectiveness of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for post-Kasai biliary atresia (BA) in the pediatric population. Information on the outcome of LDLT in patients that have reached adulthood after the Kasai procedure, however, is limited. A recent report postulated a poorer long-term outcome of LDLT in these adults. We reviewed our experience to evaluate the validity of this hypothesis. Between January 1996 and October 2006, 385 LDLTs were performed at our institution. There were 80 post-Kasai BA cases in the series; 60 (75%) were pediatric, and 20 (25%) were adults. There were no ABO blood type-incompatible cases. None were complicated with severe hepatopulmonary syndrome, portopulmonary hypertension, or hepatocellular carcinoma. The 5-year overall survival rates were 90% for the adults and 90% for the children (P > 0.99). The median follow-up period was 7 years in the adults and 11 years in the children. There was no donor mortality. The outcome of LDLT in adult post-Kasai BA patients in the present series was satisfactory; that is, adult and pediatric patient survival rates were not different. This finding suggests that for post-Kasai BA patients without serious comorbidity at the time of transplantation, LDLT can be performed safely in all age groups.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma: A prime indication for living donor liver transplantation

Cadaveric liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is limited by donor organ availability. This report reviews our initial experience with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for HCC. Since August 1998, a total of 71 adults have undergone LDLT; 27 (38%) for HCC. Underlying diagnoses included hepatitis C in 17, hepatitis B in eight, cryptogenic cirrhosis in one, and primary biliary cirrhosis in one. Four patients had recurrent HCC after resection. Patients with tumors measuring 5 cm or larger received a single dose of intravenous doxorubicin intraoperatively and six cycles of doxorubicin at 3-week intervals beginning 6 weeks postoperatively. All HCC patients are followed with CT scans and alpha-fetoprotein measurements every 3 months during the first 2 years after transplant. Mean waiting time to transplant for patients with HCC was 83 days, compared to 414 (P = 0.001) days for 50 patients with HCC who were transplanted with cadaveric organs during this period. At median follow-up of 236 days, there have been four deaths due to non-tumor-related causes and one death from recurrence; recurrence has been observed in one other patient. LDLT permits expeditious transplantation in patients with early HCC, and provides access to transplantation for patients with HCC exceeding the United Network of Organ Sharing criteria for prioritization who are, in effect, barred from receiving cadaveric organs. Presented at the Third Americas Congress of the American Hepatopancreatobiliary Association, Miami, Fla., Feb. 22–25, 2001.     

Outcome of living donor liver transplantation for Egyptian patients with hepatitis C (genotype 4)-related cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) represents a challenging issue due to universal viral recurrence and invasion into the graft, although the incidence of histological recurrence, risk factors, and survival rates are still controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Recurrence of HCV was studied in 38 of 53 adult patients who underwent LDLT. RESULTS: Recipient and graft survivals were 86.6% at the end of the follow-up which was comparable to literature reports for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Clinical HCV recurrence was observed in 10/38 patients (26.3%). Four patients developed mild fibrosis with a mean fibrosis score of 0.6 and mean grade of histological activity index (HAI) of 7.1. None of the recipients developed allograft cirrhosis during the mean follow-up period of 16 +/- 8.18 months (range, 4-35 months). Estimated and actual graft volumes were negatively correlated with the incidence and early clinical HCV recurrence. None of the other risk factors were significantly correlated with clinical HCV recurrence: gender, donor and recipient ages, pretransplantation Child-Pugh or model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, pre- and postoperative viremia, immunosuppressive drugs, pulse steroid therapy, and preoperative anti-HBc status. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative patient and graft survival rates for HCV (genotype 4)-related cirrhosis were more or less comparable to DDLT reported in the literature. Clinical HCV recurrence after LDLT in our study was low. Small graft volume was a significant risk factor for HCV recurrence. A longer follow-up and a larger number of patients are required to clarify these issues.     

Reappraisal of seventh-day syndrome following living donor liver transplantation

Seventh-day syndrome (7DS) is characterized by sudden failure of a liver graft that had been working normally at about 1 week after transplantation, without an identifiable cause. A nonnegligible percentage of cadaveric liver transplants have shown this type of acute graft failure, whereas 7DS has not been reported after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Among 580 adult LDLT recipients in our institution between 1997 and 2003, 3 (0.5%) showed clinical sequences typical of 7DS. All three recipients showed similar but unique clinical sequences, consisting of initial uneventful recovery, dramatic rise of serum liver enzyme levels about 1 week later despite potent antirejection therapy, and subsequent graft loss. Liver biopsy findings were compatible with massive hemorrhagic necrosis. Sustained fever lasting for 2 days preceded deterioration of liver function. All three patients died prior to the opportunity for retransplantation. Our findings suggest that, as in cadaveric donor liver transplantation, 7DS can also occur following LDLT and that a preceding episode of sustained fever may be a prodrome of 7DS although its pathogenesis is yet poorly understood.     

Strategic breakthrough in adult ABO‐incompatible living donor liver transplantation: preliminary results of consecutive seven cases

ABO‐incompatibility is a major obstacle to expanding exiguous donor pools in adult liver transplantation, especially in countries where grafts from deceased donors are uncommon. We present our preliminary results of ABO‐incompatible (ABO‐I) adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a new, simple protocol. Seven consecutive cases of ABO‐I LDLT were managed by the same protocol including pre‐operative administration of a single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m²) followed by three to five sessions of plasma exchange before LDLT without portal infusion therapy. The triple immunosuppression protocol consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids, with mycophenolate mofetil starting seven d before LDLT. Splenectomy was performed for all cases. All patients are alive (100% survival) with a mean follow‐up of 852 d (715–990 d). Neither antibody‐mediated nor hyperacute rejection were encountered. There was only one episode of mild acute cellular rejection, for which steroid augmentation was effective. The median preformed isoagglutinin antibody titer before plasma exchange was 256, while the median antibody titer immediately before LDLT was 16. In conclusion, adult ABO‐I LDLT results were excellent – comparable or even superior to those of ABO‐compatible LDLT. ABO‐I adult LDLT has now become a more applicable modality without the need for an appropriate donor.     

Right-liver living donor transplantation for decompensated end-stage liver disease

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients with decompensated end-stage liver disease (DELD) is controversial. Nevertheless, these patients are most in need of a timely liver transplant. We present the results of 7 patients who underwent transplantation with this procedure and discuss the rationale for its possible broader application. Seven of 51 patients who underwent right LDLT (segments 5 to 8) between August 1998 and April 2001 had DELD, defined as Child-Pugh-Turcotte score greater than 13 or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score greater than 30. All patients also were listed for cadaveric liver transplantation. Mean age of the 7 transplant recipients was 54 years (range, 44 to 63 years). Three patients had ethyltoxic cirrhosis; 2 patients, hepatitis C; 1 patient, hepatitis B; and 1 patient, autoimmune hepatitis cirrhosis. The average intensive care unit stay was 23 days (range, 3 to 88 days), and average hospital stay was 77 days (range, 27 to 132 days). Three patients are alive 31, 21, and 17 months after LDLT. At a mean follow-up of 15.1 ± 10 months, patient and graft survival rates are 43%. Four transplant recipients died day 30, 60, 117, and 180 after transplantation. Three of the seven donors (43%) experienced a complication. At present, all donors are well and have returned to their normal activities. No donors had regrets about the procedure, and all donors stated that they would donate again if presented with the same decision. In conclusion, with the lack of other therapeutic options, LDLT represents a timely and effective alternative to cadaveric liver transplantation. Better outcome is foreseeable with a decrease in posttransplantation complications and more experience in predicting survival of these critical patients. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:340-346.)