疝环填充式与普理灵疝装置无张力疝修补术的比较

目的对目前临床上广泛应用的疝环填充式（Perfix Plug-mesh）与普理灵疝装置（PHS）腹股沟疝无张力修补术的手术方式及临床效果进行比较。方法回顾性统计、分析我院自2003年7月至2005年7月所进行的208例腹股沟疝修补术的病例资料。结果疝环填充式无张力修补术156例，普理灵疝装置无张力修补术52例。两组在手术时间、术后短期疼痛、下地时间、并发症及远期不适发生率方面差异无统计学意义。术后平均随访20．3个月，疝环填充组复发率为1．3％；PHS组未见复发。结论疝环填充式与PHS修补均为理想的无张力疝修补术式，具有复发率低，手术操作简便，术后恢复快，术后疼痛轻等特点。相较而言，两种术式各有优势与不足。应对每位患者进行充分的检查与评估，根据具体情况选择适宜的疝修补术式。     

疝环充填式与平片式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床比较研究

目的：比较疝环充填式与平片式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法：随机将135例腹股沟疝病人分为疝环充填式组和平片式组，分析比较两组的临床及随访资料。结果：两组在手术时间，术后早期疼痛，导尿率，体温，并发症，平均住院日及术后复发率等方面无明显差异。结论：疝环充填式与平片式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝总的治疗效果相近。     

疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效观察

目的探讨疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果。方法按不同术式将90例腹股沟疝患者分为2组,每组45例。观察组行疝环充填式无张力疝修补术,对照组行Bassini疝修补术。比较2组的治疗效果。结果观察组手术时间、术后下床活动时间及住院时间均少于对照组,并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后随访24个月,观察组复发率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论对腹股沟疝患者实施疝环充填式无张力疝修补术,术后恢复时间短,并发症发生率及复发率低。     

平片式、疝环充填式和腹膜前疝修补治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床对比分析

目的探讨平片式、疝环充填式和腹膜前疝修补治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果和安全性。方法成人腹股沟疝病人155例。根据手术方式不同分为三组,平片组61例,采用平片式无张力疝修补,疝环充填组43例,采用疝环充填式修补,腹膜前组51例,采用腹膜前无张力疝修补。比较三组病人围手术期情况、术后并发症、术后疼痛程度、术后异物感和复发率。结果三组手术时间、下床活动时间、住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P 0. 05)。术后共发生尿潴留2例,阴囊水肿1例,切口感染1例,三组术后并发症总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P 0. 05)。疝环充填组术后1个月、3个月的VAS评分高于平片组和腹膜前组,差异有统计学意义(P 0. 05)。疝环充填组主诉有明显异物感8例(18. 60%),明显高于平片组和腹膜前组,差异有统计学意义(P 0. 05)。三组术后复发率比较差异无统计学意义(P 0. 05)。结论平片式、疝环充填式和腹膜前疝修补治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效相当,疝环充填式病人术后异物感和疼痛感较明显。平片式无张力疝修补术疗效确切,并发症少,复发率低,操作便捷,费用低。     

疝环填充式无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术在腹股沟疝治疗中的疗效比较

目的比较疝环填充式无张力疝修补术和传统疝修补术在治疗腹股沟疝疗效中的优缺点。方法选取2000年1月至2009年12月行腹股沟疝修补术的病例共98例,其中疝环填充式无张力疝修补术78例,传统疝修补术20例,对患者手术时间、下床行走时间、术后住院时间、阴囊积液情况及是否复发进行比较。结果疝环填充式无张力疝修补术相较于传统术式,患者手术时间明显缩短,下床活动时间显著提前,术后住院时间显著缩短,出现阴囊积液比例明显减少,复发率显著下降。结论与传统术式相比,疝环填充式无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝的治疗中具有显著优势,更适合临床采用。     

平片式和疝环充填式无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝临床体会

目的探讨平片式和疝环充填式无张力腹股沟疝修补术的应用体会。方法复习我院自2004年1月-2007年12月使用美国Bard公司研制的修补材料对107例腹股沟疝患者进行110例次无张力修补术的临床资料。平片式修补77例次，疝环充填式修补33例次。结果本组无特殊并发症，随访6个月～4年，无一例复发。两种术式在手术时间、患者恢复情况、并发症，及住院天数无明显差异；而住院费用有显著差异。结论无张力疝修补术术后疼痛轻、恢复快、复发率少。尤其适用于中老年患者以及复发疝。术中要对网片进行修剪，使其适合局部解剖，且将网片固定妥当是手术成功的关键。平片无张力疝修补术较疝环充填式无张力疝修补术费用低、操作简单。     

疝环充填式与普理灵疝装置两种疝修补术的疗效对比分析

目的对比分析疝环充填式与普理灵疝装置两种无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的手术效果。方法1999年8月到2003年6月行无张力修补术治疗521例腹股沟疝,其中应用疝环充填术式378例(A组),普理灵疝装置术式143例(B组),观察两者的手术时间、术后疼痛程度、术后自主能力恢复时间、并发症和复发率。结果A组手术时间、术后8小时疼痛程度、尿潴留和阴囊水肿发生率均显著少于B组(P<0.01);A组术后局部异物感发生率显著高于B组(P<0.01);A、B两组术后自主能力恢复时间、术后24小时疼痛程度及复发率比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论疝环充填式及普理灵疝疝装置无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝,均有术后恢复快、复发率低的优点,但在手术时间、术后8小时疼痛程度及并发症发生率方面各有优缺点,根据患者的具体情况选择个体化的修补方案可提高手术效果。     

疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝96例临床体会

目的总结应用疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的经验。方法对本院使用美国Bard公司的疝环充填物及网状补片治疗的96例腹股沟疝的手术方法、时间、术后患者疼痛、住院时间、复发率进行回顾分析。结果巴德材料疝环充填式无张力疝修补术手术方法简便,术后疼痛轻,恢复快,复发率低。结论巴德材料疝环充填式无张力疝修补术手术方式更加符合人体解剖结构,效果好,安全可靠。     

传统疝修补术与疝环填充式无张力疝修补术临床疗效比较

目的：比较传统疝修补术与疝环填充式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2011年6月至2012年12月,巨野县人民医院收治的腹股沟疝患者94例,根据患者采用的手术方式分为观察组53例和对照组41例。观察组给予疝环填充式无张力疝修补术治疗,对照组给予传统疝修补术治疗。结果本组患者均顺利完成手术,二组患者在手术时间、住院时间、下床活动时间以及镇痛人数比较,差异有统计学意义（t ＝9．019、6．634、28．201,χ2＝7．393,P＝0．007、0．012、0．031、0．007）。二组患者并发症发生率、复发率比较差异均无统计学意义（χ2＝0．106、0．034,P＝0．745、0．854）。结论与传统疝修补术比较,疝环填充式无张力修补术在腹股沟疝中具有手术时间短、镇痛患者少等优点,值得临床应用。     

平片式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效分析

目的探讨平片式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床治疗效果。方法采用平片式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝80例,与我院以前用传统组织张力缝合修补术治疗的80例腹股沟疝病例进行对比分析,比较二种术式术中、术后患者的情况。结果在平均手术时间、平均住院时间、术后并发症的发生率、术后疼痛时间、术后复发率等多项观察指标上,观察组都明显优于对照组(P<0.01或P<0.05)。结论与传统术式相比,平片式无张力疝修补术具有操作简单、术中创伤小、术后恢复快、不易复发等特点,适合在无腹腔镜的基层医院广泛推广使用。     

腹股沟疝 UHS 手术

超普疝修补装置（ ULTRAPRO Hernia System, UHS）由上片、下片和中间连接柱构成。下片位于腹膜与腹横筋膜之间（腹膜前间隙）,覆盖整个肌耻骨孔,起到了腹膜前间隙修补的作用;将上片分别固定于腹股沟韧带和耻骨结节,加强腹股沟管后壁;中间连接柱既充填了疝环缺损,又连接和稳定了上、下片,可防止网片移位造成的复发。 UHS同时对腹膜前间隙和腹股沟管后壁进行双重修补,理论上最大限度地减少了腹股沟疝的复发。     

���������޲���——���޲�������������

自Ｂassini首创疝修补术以来,至今已有１００余年历史。尽管其总体疗效尚称满意,但有关各术式的立论依据及其适应证一直有着争论,疝修补的术后复发和并发症仍存在问题。据报道,初发腹股沟疝的术后复发率约为１０％,而复发性疝可高达２０％,总的并发症发生率也在７％－１２％之间。因此,如何提高腹外疝手术的成功率,降低术后并发症发生率,是临床外科亟待解决的课题。     

无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效分析

目的探讨无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效,为基层医院的治疗提供参考。方法将86例患者按照随机原则分为观察组与对照组,每组43例,观察组采用无张力疝修补术进行治疗,对照组采用传统疝修补术进行治疗,比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、住院费用、术后恢复时间、并发症及复发情况。结果两组患者的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;两组患者的住院时间、术后恢复时间、住院费用比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。两组患者的并发症发生率,观察组为30.2%,对照组为58.1%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。两组患者的复发率对照组为18.6%、观察组为2.3%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论无张力疝修补术操作简单、复发率低、并发症少,易为患者接受,较适合在基层医院推广应用。     

Intrascrotal hernia of the ureter and fatty hernia

Intrascrotal hernia of the ureter is a rare event. We describe here one such case. There are two anatomic types of such ureteral hernias. The paraperitoneal type has a peritoneal indirect sac, which pulls the ureter with it. The extraperitoneal ureteral hernia is without a peritoneal sac. In such cases, which are almost always indirect hernias, there is usually a large amount of fat. It is, in fact, retroperitoneal fat, which slides, and pulls the ureter with it by gravity. Such a case is a genuine prolapse of the retroperitoneal structures. This anomaly, which has been rarely studied, is worth knowing about, because the ureter may be damaged during hernia dissection. The surgeon should be cautious when discovering huge fatty hernias, and should avoid the excision of fat and simply return the fatty mass to its normal place after its separation from the cord. Electronic Publication     

Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system

BACKGROUND: Despite its extensive application for the repair of inguinal hernias, the use of the Prolene Hernia System (PHS; Ethicon, West Somerville, NJ) for the repair of umbilical hernias has been sparse. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess, in comparison with currently available techniques, the effectiveness of the PHS in repairing umbilical hernias. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients diagnosed with a primary umbilical hernia were enrolled for the study. They were randomized and underwent elective repair of umbilical hernia using either the PHS (n = 17), Mayo repair (n = 18), or onlay repair with mesh (n = 15). Data for the time required for the surgical repair method, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, analgesic necessity, and return to work, and early and late complications were recorded, and compared with respect to the repair procedure. RESULTS: The mean operating time and the mean length of hospital stay were the longest in the onlay repair with mesh group (P < .05). Those patients operated on using the PHS described minimum pain on the postoperative first , second, and seventh days (P < .05) and also the necessity of analgesic was significantly lower in this group (P < .05). There were 2 recurrences in Mayo repair group. The mean follow-up duration was 22 months (range 6 to 44 months). CONCLUSION: The PHS seemed to be useful for umbilical hernia repairs in selected patients as it caused minimal postoperative pain and less analgesic necessity.     

Spigelian hernia presenting as an incarcerated incisional hernia

Summary Spigelian hernia, first described at the 18th century, is a rare ventral abdominal hernia occuring through the spigelian fascia. The diagnosis is difficult especially when there is no palpable mass. The case presented here had a spigelian hernia mimicking an incarcerated incisional hernia. This patient had undergone an appendectomy through a right paramedian incision proviously. Three years later she was operated for a suspected incisional hernia. Exploration did not reveal any defects in the external oblique aponeurosis so no further exploration was done. Our operative findings showed also an intact external oblique aponeurosis but when incised a spigelian hernia was observed beneath this structure, which was repaired promptly. A high index of suspicision is necessary for diagnosis both pre and intraoperatively.     

Indirect inguinal hernia masquerading as a Spigelian hernia

Inguinal hernia usually developed and descended into scrotum. The clinical presentation is inguinal or inguino-scrotal swelling. Abdominal wall weakness as it is frequently seen in African tropical zones produces often rare clinical case. We report a case of inguinal hernia presented as an abdominal wall swelling clinically suggestive of a Spigelian hernia and discuss the mechanism.     

Operation hernia: humanitarian hernia repairs in Ghana

Ghana has a high incidence of inguinal hernias and the healthcare system is unable to deliver an adequate repair rate. This results in morbidity and mortality and has a knock-on effect on the local economy. A project has been set up to try and reduce the burden of these hernias by establishing Africa’s first Hernia Centre. This is supported by structured visits by European surgeons to the centre. In October 2006, a team of four surgeons, two specialist registrars, one hernia nurse specialist, and three nurses was assembled in order to open the Hernia Centre, which will provide a base for the delivery of hernia services in the West of Ghana. A 2-year teaching programme has been formulated, tailored to the needs of local surgeons and nurses, with the aim of developing an integrated team that will initially deliver up to 50 hernia repairs each month. It is planned that the centre will be supported by structured periodic visits from surgeons and nurses based in Plymouth, the European Hernia Society, and any other volunteers wishing to support the link.