Coronary Heart Disease and Risk Factors in Latin America

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in Latin America, with ischemic heart disease as the principal cause in most countries. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease are highly prevalent in the region, but there are international variations in the pattern and level of risk factors. Overweight and obesity are increasing. In the 2012 Mexican National Survey, overweight or obesity was found in 64.9% of men and 73% of women, and they were strongly associated with sedentarism. The most characteristic dyslipidemia abnormality in the region is low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, followed by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increased levels of triglycerides. National diabetes mellitus prevalence ranges from 2.8% to 9.4% and tobacco smoking from 12.8% to 42%. According to the INTERHEART (A Study of Risk Factors for First Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries and Over 27,000 Subjects) data for Latin America, the highest attributable risks for myocardial infarction were related to abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, and smoking.     

Systemic lupus erythematosus and cardiac risk factors: medical record documentation and patient adherence

This study explores patients' knowledge of cardiac risk factors (CRFs), analyses how information and advice about CRFs are documented in clinical practice, and assesses patient adherence to received instructions to decrease CRFs. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with?≥?4 ACR criteria participated through completing a validated cardiovascular health questionnaire (CHQ). Kappa statistics were used to compare medical records with the self-reported CHQ (agreement) and to evaluate adherence. Two hundred and eleven (72%) of the known patients with SLE participated. The mean age of the patients was 55?years. More than 70% of the SLE patients considered hypertension, obesity, smoking and hypercholesterolaemia to be very important CRFs. The agreement between medical record documentation and patients' reports was moderate for hypertension, overweight and hypercholesterolaemia (kappa 0.42-0.60) but substantial for diabetes (kappa 0.66). Patients' self-reported adherence to advice they had received regarding medication was substantial to perfect (kappa 0.65-1.0). For lifestyle changes in patients with hypertension and overweight, adherence was only fair to moderate (kappa 0.13-0.47). Swedish SLE patients' awareness of traditional CRFs was good in this study. However, the agreement between patients' self-reports and medical record documentation of CRF profiles, and patients' adherence to medical advice to CRF profiles, could be improved.     

Validity of self-reported cardiovascular disease events in comparison to medical record adjudication and a statewide hospital morbidity database: the AusDiab study

Epidemiological studies often rely on self-reported cardiovascular disease (CVD) information, but this may be inaccurate. We investigated the accuracy of self-reported CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery bypass surgery and coronary artery angioplasty) during the follow up of the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study. Self-reported CVD events, including the date of the event and hospital admission details, were collected with an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Of the 276 self-reported CVD events, 188 (68.1%) were verified by adjudication of medical records. Furthermore, linkage to the statewide Western Australian Hospital Morbidity Database (WAHMD) showed that CVD events were unlikely to be missed, with only 0.2% of those denying any CVD event being recorded as having had an event on the WAHMD. The adjudication of medical records was as accurate as record linkage to the WAHMD for validation of self-reported CVD, but combining the results from both methods of ascertainment improved CVD event identification.     

Do people self-reporting information about chronic respiratory disease have corroborative evidence in their general practice medical records? A study of intermethod reliability.

AIMS: To use intermethod reliability to compare self-reported data about chronic respiratory disease and health service utilisation with data contained in general practice medical records. METHODS: Self-reported postal questionnaire information from a small cohort of an age-sex stratified sample of 2318 patients was compared with information contained in their medical records. The agreement between the two sources of information was assessed. RESULTS: The case notes of 115/135 individuals from eight general practices were examined. For self-reported chest injury or operation (kappa, kappa=-0.03), or chronic bronchitis (kappa=0.10), agreement was poor. Agreement for self-reported pleurisy (kappa=0.32), hay fever or rhinitis (kappa=0.40), or eczema or dermatitis (kappa=0.30) was fair; for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or emphysema (kappa=0.56), or heart trouble (kappa=0.54), agreement was moderate; for asthma (kappa=0.78) or pneumonia (kappa=0.62), agreement was good; and for pulmonary tuberculosis (kappa=0.88), agreement was very good. The strength of agreement for information about health service utilisation for respiratory problems ranged from moderate to very good and was good for smoking status. CONCLUSIONS: Although based on small numbers, our results suggest good or very good agreement between self-reported data and general practice medical records for the absence or presence of some respiratory conditions and some types of respiratory-related health care utilisation. Depending on the research question being examined self-reported information may be appropriate.     

Self-reported medication adherence and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease: the heart and soul study

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to physician treatment recommendations is an increasingly recognized cause of adverse outcomes and increased health care costs, particularly among patients with cardiovascular disease. Whether patient self-report can provide an accurate assessment of medication adherence in outpatients with stable coronary heart disease is unknown. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the risk of cardiovascular events associated with self-reported medication nonadherence in 1015 outpatients with established coronary heart disease from the Heart and Soul Study. We asked participants a single question: "In the past month, how often did you take your medications as the doctor prescribed?" Nonadherence was defined as taking medications as prescribed 75% of the time or less. Cardiovascular events (coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) were identified by review of medical records during 3.9 years of follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to determine the risk of adverse cardiovascular events associated with self-reported medication nonadherence. RESULTS: Of the 1015 participants, 83 (8.2%) reported nonadherence to their medications, and 146 (14.4%) developed cardiovascular events. Nonadherent participants were more likely than adherent participants to develop cardiovascular events during 3.9 years of follow-up (22.9% vs 13.8%, P = .03). Self-reported nonadherence remained independently predictive of adverse cardiovascular events after adjusting for baseline cardiac disease severity, traditional risk factors, and depressive symptoms (hazards ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.3; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: In outpatients with stable coronary heart disease, self-reported medication nonadherence is associated with a greater than 2-fold increased rate of subsequent cardiovascular events. A single question about medication adherence may be a simple and effective method to identify patients at higher risk for adverse cardiovascular events.     

Pitfalls in assessing the quality of care for patients with cardiovascular disease

PURPOSE: There are no clinical performance measures for cardiovascular diseases that span the continuum of hospital through postdischarge ambulatory care. We tested the feasibility of developing and implementing such measures for patients with acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or hypertension. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: After reviewing practice guidelines and the medical literature, we developed potential measures related to therapy, diagnostic evaluation, and communication. We tested the feasibility of implementing the selected measures for 518 patients with myocardial infarction, 396 with heart failure, and 601 with hypertension who were enrolled in four major U.S. managed care plans at six geographic sites, using data from administrative claims, medical records, and patient surveys. RESULTS: Difficulties in obtaining timely data and small numbers of cases adversely affected measurement. We encountered 6- to 12-month delays, disagreement between principal discharge diagnosis as coded in administrative and records data (for 9% of myocardial infarction and 21% of heart failure patients), missing medical records (20% for both myocardial infarction and heart failure patients), and problems in identifying physicians accountable for care. Low rates of performing key diagnostic tests (e.g., ejection fraction) excluded many cases from measures of appropriate therapy that were conditional on test results. Patient survey response rates were low. CONCLUSIONS: Constructing meaningful clinical performance measures is straightforward, but implementing them on a large scale will require improved data systems. Lack of standardized data captured at the point of clinical care and low rates of eligibility for key measures hamper measurement of quality of care.     

Medical records as sources of data on cardiovascular disease events in persons with diabetes

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate medical records as a source of data on cardiovascular disease over a 20-year interval. METHODS: Participants in a population-based cohort of persons with Type 1 diabetes were asked whether they had been told by a doctor that they had several specific cardiovascular events. In addition, they were asked when and where they were hospitalized for myocardial infarction, stroke, surgical procedures, and for other conditions and procedures. The medical care institution was contacted to obtain copies of the relevant hospitalization. RESULTS: Overall, the confirmation of the self-reported events was 86.0% when medical records were obtained. Percent confirmed varied with the diagnosis. Reports of poor circulation in the lower extremities were confirmed in 42.6%, stroke was confirmed in 70%, and coronary bypass surgery was confirmed in 100% of cases. The success of obtaining medical records was greater for those events that were reported to have occurred more recently than those reported further in the past, especially when 10 or more years had elapsed. CONCLUSION: Medical record confirmation of reported cardiovascular events in persons with Type 1 diabetes was high for some events when medical records could be obtained but was lower for "poor circulation" to the legs and stroke possibly related to the lack of specificity of our questions, to incorrect attribution of symptoms by the respondent, or to inaccurate recall of a physician's examination. Medical record confirmation was better for more recent than past events. Therefore, when hard copy documentation is needed, it should be sought within 10 years of the event.     

Periodontal disease and risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease in U.S. male physicians

OBJECTIVES: We sought to prospectively assess whether self-reported periodontal disease is associated with subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease in a large population of male physicians. BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease, the result of a complex interplay of bacterial infection and chronic inflammation, has been suggested to be a predictor of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Physicians' Health Study I was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aspirin and beta-carotene in 22,071 U.S. male physicians. A total of 22,037 physicians provided self-reports of presence or absence of periodontal disease at study entry and were included in this analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2,653 physicians reported a personal history of periodontal disease at baseline. During an average of 12.3 years of follow-up, there were 797 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, 631 nonfatal strokes and 614 cardiovascular deaths. Thus, for each end point, the study had >90% power to detect a clinically important increased risk of 50%. In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for age and treatment assignment, physicians who reported periodontal disease at baseline had slightly elevated, but statistically nonsignificant, relative risks (RR) of nonfatal myocardial infarction, (RR, 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.36), nonfatal stroke (RR, 1.10; CI, 0.88 to 1.37) and cardiovascular death (RR, 1.20; CI, 0.97 to 1.49). Relative risk for a combined end point of all important cardiovascular events (first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or cardiovascular death) was 1.13 (CI, 0.99 to 1.28). After adjustment for other cardiovascular risk factors, RRs were all attenuated and nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: These prospective data suggest that self-reported periodontal disease is not an independent predictor of subsequent cardiovascular disease in middle-aged to elderly men.     

Comparison of medical care and survival of hospitalized patients with acute myocardial infarction in Poland and the United States

Few studies have evaluated between-country differences in medical care and survival after acute myocardial infarction, and none have compared the US with countries from Eastern Europe. Comparable data from the US (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study [US-ARIC]) and Poland (Multinational Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease project [Pol-MONICA]) were developed. From 1987 through 1993, a total of 3,694 patients were hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction events in the 2 Pol-MONICA communities and 4,801 in the 4 US-ARIC communities. Patients in the US-ARIC were 1.7 times more likely to be treated in a coronary care unit and received cardiac procedures, calcium channel blockers, and thrombolytic agents significantly more often than patients in the Pol-MONICA. The use of antiplatelet agents, nitrates, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and beta blockade agents was similar in both countries. Case fatality (28-day) rates after hospitalized acute myocardial infarction were nearly identical (men, 7% in Pol-MONICA vs 6% in US-ARIC; women, 9% in Pol-MONICA vs 8% in US-ARIC). However, when fatal coronary heart disease events not associated with a hospitalized myocardial infarction were included, the US-ARIC rates were less than half than those seen in Pol-MONICA. Substantial differences in treatment of hospitalized acute myocardial infarction between countries did not translate into a survival advantage for patients reaching clinical attention. Differences in case severity, arising from the high out-of-hospital coronary death rate in Poland may play an important role in this finding.     

Cardiovascular disease epidemiology and risk factors in primary care

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in primary care. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A cross-sectional study was carried out at an urban health center in Barcelona, Spain. In total, 2248 patients > or =15 years old were selected randomly from medical records. The study investigated cardiovascular diseases such as ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral arterial disease, and cardiovascular risk factors such as age, sex, smoking, high blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 49.1 (18.9) years and 53.5% were male. Cardiovascular risk factor prevalences were: smoking, 35.2%; high blood pressure, 33.7%; hypercholesterolemia, 21.9%; hypertriglyceridemia,12.7%; and diabetes mellitus, 15.8%. Overall, 57.9% of patients had at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor. Significantly more males presented with each risk factor (P<.05), apart from high blood pressure. The prevalence of all risk factors, except smoking, increased with age until 74 years and then stabilized, except high blood pressure, which continued to increase. Around 10% had cardiovascular disease, with myocardial ischemia in 5.5%, cerebrovascular disease in 3.7%, and peripheral arterial disease in 2.4%. All except cerebrovascular disease were significantly more common in males (P<.05). The prevalence of cardiovascular disease was low in individuals <55 years old, particularly women, and increased with age for all forms of disease. Some 68.3% were > or =65 years old. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was confirmed. Cardiovascular disease was more common in males and the elderly.     

Self-reported medical history and self-rated health at age 90. Agreement with medical records

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Taking medical history from a very old patient for either clinical or research purposes raises the question of the reliability of the information obtained. We ascertained whether the self-reported medical history and self-rated health of 90-year-olds would be in agreement with their medical records. METHODS: Information on chronic diseases and self-rated health was collected using medical records and a mailed questionnaire in a population sample of community-living 90-year-old subjects in Tampere, Finland. The results were compared with earlier studies on self-reported medical history. RESULTS: The inter-source agreement of the reported diseases was relatively good. As expected, many of the diseases diagnosed were under-reported in the mailed questionnaire. However, dementia, depression and arthritis were reported more often than doctors had recorded them. Of the respondents, 78% reported their current health as good or average. Subjects with heart disease, stroke, rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson's disease or depression reported poor health more often than those not having these diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between medical records and self-reported medical history obtained by questionnaire showed a similar pattern to earlier studies in younger old populations, but in the 90-year olds, the differences became larger. In future studies, special attention should be paid to the oldest old who under-report certain diagnosed medical conditions.     

Myocardial infarction in Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites. The San Antonio Heart Study

Mexican-American men experience reduced cardiovascular mortality compared with non-Hispanic white men. There is no corresponding ethnic difference in cardiovascular mortality in women. The difference in men could result either from a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease or a lower case fatality rate among Mexican-Americans. Although the incidence of cardiovascular disease in Mexican-Americans is unknown, we have collected data on prevalence of myocardial infarction in 5,148 individuals examined in the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based survey of cardiovascular disease conducted between 1979 and 1988 in Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic whites aged 25-64 years. Myocardial infarction was assessed by Minnesota-coded electrocardiograms and by a self-reported history of a physician-diagnosed heart attack. For both end points, the age-adjusted prevalence of myocardial infarction was lower in Mexican-American men than in non-Hispanic white men. After adjustment for age and diabetes status (present/absent), the odds of a myocardial infarction, as defined by either criterion, was approximately one third lower in Mexican-American men than in non-Hispanic white men (p = 0.06). In women, the prevalence of both myocardial infarction end points was slightly higher in Mexican-Americans than in non-Hispanic whites, although neither of these differences was significant. Although the ethnic differences in prevalence in this study were not statistically significant, their pattern parallels the pattern in the mortality due to cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, the results support the hypothesis that the reduced cardiovascular mortality rate observed in Mexican-American men reflects a lower incidence of myocardial infarction rather than a reduced case fatality rate because the latter would result in a higher prevalence.     

What is the real hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction? Epidemiological vs clinical view.

AIMS: To examine the general influence of the definition of fatal and non-fatal acute myocardial infarction and coronary deaths on the estimation of in-hospital case-fatality, and to show how the definition of acute myocardial infarction influences time-trends of hospital mortality over 11 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of the World Health Organization's MONICA (multinational Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Project in Augsburg all patients aged 25-74 years with a suspected diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction who were hospitalized in the study region's major clinic were registered prospectively between 1985 to 1995 (n=4889). Patient information, including short-term survival status, was obtained from medical records, by interview of surviving patients, and municipal death certificate files which were validated by an extended identification and validation process. In-hospital case fatality was estimated according to different definitions which closely followed the international MONICA criteria. Epidemiological definitions comprised definite and possible acute myocardial infarction, and events with unclassifiable deaths, while the clinical definition was restricted to definite infarction. Overall, case fatality by the epidemiological definitions was 28 to 29.8% (23.5% of those treated in a coronary care unit) compared to 13.5% using the clinical definition. While over the 11 years, the reduction in case fatality according to the epidemiological definitions was modest, highly significant decreases were observed by applying the clinical definition (from 15.8% in 1985-1988 to 10.8% in 1993-1995, P<0.001 adjusted for age and sex). The discrepancy in case fatality between the definitions is explained by the high proportion of patients who die very early (about 70% of all fatal events during the first 24 h) with the consequence of missing data which may preclude a definite diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Applying a broader definition of acute myocardial infarction reveals that in-hospital mortality is higher than believed until now, and it implies that our efforts must be intensified to reduce overall in-hospital coronary heart disease mortality.     

Depression and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: cause or consequence?

BACKGROUND: Depression after myocardial infarction has been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. This study assessed whether depressive symptoms were associated with adverse outcomes in people with a history of an acute coronary syndrome, and evaluated possible explanations for such an association. METHODS AND RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were assessed using the General Health Questionnaire at least 5 months after hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina in 1130 participants of the Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study, a multicentre, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of cholesterol-lowering treatment. Cardiovascular symptoms, self-rated general health, cardiovascular risk factors, employment status, social support and life events were also assessed at the baseline visit. Cardiovascular death (n=114), non-fatal myocardial infarction (n=108), non-fatal stroke (n=53) and unstable angina (n=274) were documented during a median follow-up period of 8.1 years. Individuals with depressive symptoms (General Health Questionnaire score >/=5; 22% of participants) were more likely to report angina, dyspnoea, claudication, poorer general health, not being in paid employment, few social contacts and/or adverse life events (P<0.05 for all). There was a modest association between depressive symptoms and cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.77), but not cardiovascular death (HR 1.12. 95% CI 0.71-1.77). After adjustment for symptoms related to cardiovascular disease, the HR for cardiovascular events was 1.22 (95% CI 0.97-1.53). After further adjustment for employment status, social support and life events, the HR was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant association between depressive symptoms and fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events after adjustment for cardiovascular symptoms associated with poorer prognosis. Previously observed associations between depression and cardiovascular mortality may not be causal.     

Undocumented patient information: an impediment to quality of care

PURPOSE: Poor documentation in medical records might reduce the quality of care and undermine analyses based on retrospective chart reviews. We assessed the documentation of cardiac risk factors and cardiac history in the records of patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction or heart failure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study involving direct chart audit of all consecutive hospitalizations for myocardial infarction (n = 2,109) or heart failure (n = 3,392) in Nova Scotia, Canada, from October 15, 1997, to October 14, 1998. The main outcome measures were the documentation rates for prespecified clinical items, including cardiac risk factors and history of myocardial infarction or heart failure, which were recognized as indicators of the quality of care for the conditions under study. RESULTS: Information was not documented in a high proportion of cases, ranging from 9% (smoking) to 58% (previous history of heart failure) in charts from patients hospitalized for myocardial infarction, and from 19% (smoking) to 69% (hyperlipidemia) in charts from heart failure hospitalizations. Lack of documentation was more common in women and the elderly. CONCLUSION: Documentation of important clinical information is poor even in the hospital charts of patients with severe conditions. This quality-of-care issue has implications for health services and outcomes research, including the development of report cards.     

Myocardial infarction in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL)

Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is an angiopathy caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene. Typical microvascular changes are found throughout the arterial tree, but the documented disease expression is confined to the central nervous system. In an ongoing CADASIL study, we noted a number of patients with early acute myocardial infarction (before the age of 50 years), as well as patients with electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities. We analyzed these data to determine whether myocardial ischemia is associated with NOTCH3 mutations. ECGs were recorded in mutated (n = 41) and nonmutated (n = 22) individuals from 15 genetically confirmed CADASIL families, and blindly classified according to the Minnesota code. Cardiologic history was assessed and cardiovascular disease risk factors were determined. Evidence for myocardial infarction was defined as a positive history for acute myocardial infarction and/or a Minnesota Code 1 (Q-waves) on ECG. We examined CADASIL myocardial tissue ultrastructurally and immunohistochemically for evidence of microangiopathy.We found that almost 25% (10/41) of mutation carriers had evidence of myocardial infarction, versus none of the 22 nonmutation carriers (p = 0.011). Five had a medical history of acute myocardial infarction, and 5 had current pathologic Q-waves on ECG. Acute myocardial infarction occurred at a mean age of 39.6 +/- 5.22 years, and predated major neurologic symptoms of CADASIL in all cases. Pathologic examination of myocardial tissue revealed typical CADASIL arteriopathic changes of the coronary microvasculature. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that NOTCH3 mutation carriers may be at increased risk of early acute myocardial infarction, expanding CADASIL disease expression beyond the central nervous system to include the heart.     

The Effects of Human Papillomavirus Infection and Vaccination on Cardiovascular Diseases,NHANES 2003-2016

BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been proposed to be an unconventional risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. We investigated the association between HPV infection and cardiovascular diseases among women with or without HPV vaccination.MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 9,353 women aged between 20 to 59 years old who were tested for vaginal HPV DNA in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2016. Cardiovascular diseases were defined as the presence of self-reported coronary heart diseases, heart attacks, angina pectoris, and stroke. The association between HPV and cardiovascular diseases was studied using logistic regression, with adjustment for the potential confounders.ResultsA total of 40.8% of women were HPV DNA positive; 3.0% had cardiovascular diseases; and 9.0% of women received the HPV vaccine. The presence of vaginal HPV infection was associated with cardiovascular diseases (odd ratio [OR] = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.16), which remained significant (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.15-2.08) after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle behaviors, medical history, family history of cardiovascular diseases, and antihypertensive drugs. The association was absent among those who were vaccinated against HPV (OR= 0.50, 95% CI 0.07-3.51) but present among those who were not (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.18-2.25).ConclusionsThere was an association between HPV infection and cardiovascular diseases. This association was not significant among women vaccinated against HPV. The effect of HPV vaccination on cardiovascular diseases requires further investigation.     

Association Between E-Cigarette Use and Cardiovascular Disease Among Never and Current Combustible-Cigarette Smokers

BackgroundThe prevalence of e-cigarette use in the United States has increased rapidly. However, the association between e-cigarette use and cardiovascular disease remains virtually unknown. Therefore, we aimed to examine the association between e-cigarette use and cardiovascular disease among never and current combustible-cigarette smokers.MethodsWe pooled 2016 and 2017 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a large, nationally representative, cross-sectional telephone survey. We included 449,092 participants with complete self-reported information on all key variables. The main exposure, e-cigarette use, was further divided into daily or occasional use, and stratified by combustible-cigarette use (never and current). Cardiovascular disease, the main outcome, was defined as a composite of self-reported coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, or stroke.ResultsOf 449,092 participants, there were 15,863 (3.5%) current e-cigarette users, 12,908 (2.9%) dual users of e-cigarettes + combustible cigarettes, and 44,852 (10.0%) with cardiovascular disease. We found no significant association between e-cigarette use and cardiovascular disease among never combustible-cigarette smokers. Compared with current combustible-cigarette smokers who never used e-cigarettes, dual use of e-cigarettes + combustible cigarettes was associated with 36% higher odds of cardiovascular disease (odds ratio 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.56); with consistent results in subgroup analyses of premature cardiovascular disease in women < 65 years and men < 55 years old.ConclusionOur results suggest significantly higher odds of cardiovascular disease among dual users of e-cigarettes + combustible cigarettes compared with smoking alone. These data, although preliminary, support the critical need to conduct longitudinal studies exploring cardiovascular disease risk associated with e-cigarette use, particularly among dual users.     

北京市急性心肌梗死患者决定就医延迟的影响因素

目的 调查北京市急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者决定就医延迟程度及影响因素.方法 入选2005年11月至2006年12月底就诊于北京市19所医院并于发病后24 h内到院的799例ST段抬高AMI(STEMI)患者.通过与患者进行结构式访谈及查阅病历收集资料.以决定就医延迟30 min为切点,分为早决定组及晚决定组,对比分析两组资料.结果 中位决定就医延迟为60 min.多因素回归分析显示:心肌梗死病史、无晕厥发生、症状呈间断性、症状能够耐受及未将症状归于心脏病是决定就医延迟＞30 min的独立预测因素.早决定组患者具有更高的早期再灌注治疗率及更短的发病至再灌注治疗延迟.结论 北京市AMI患者决定就医时间明显延迟,既往有心肌梗死病史、症状特点及认知因素影响决定就医延迟程度.