Severely injured geriatric patients return to independent living: a study of factors influencing function and independence

Our previous work demonstrated that geriatric trauma patients (age greater than 65 years) consume disproportionate amounts of health care resources. In the past we hypothesized that late mortality is high, long-term outcome is poor, and return to independence is low in a severely injured geriatric population. Of 6,480 trauma admissions over 5 years, geriatric patients (n = 495) with blunt trauma injury (n = 421) and an ISS greater than 16 (n = 105) who survived until discharge (n = 61) underwent long-term follow-up (mean = 2.82 years). We surveyed 20 measures of functional ability; 10 measures of independence; availability and use of rehabilitation resources; employment history; alcohol use; support systems; and nursing home requirements. Of the 105 patients, 7 were subsequently lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 98, 44 (44.9%) died in hospital and 54 (55.1%) were discharged and interviewed. The mean age of the contacted patients was 72.6; their mean ISS was 23.3. Forty eight of 54 (88.9%) were alive at the time of interview, while 6/54 (11.1%) had died. Although only 8/48 patients regained their preinjury level of function, 32/48 (67%) returned to independent living. The 32 independent patients, those with "acceptable" outcome, were compared with an "unacceptable" outcome group composed of the 44 in-hospital deaths, the 6 late deaths, and the 16 dependent patients. Factors associated with poor outcome include a GCS score less than or equal to (p = 0.001), age greater than or equal to 75 (p = 0.004), shock upon admission (p = 0.014), presence of head injury (p = 0.03), and sepsis (p = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Multiple organ failure still a major cause of morbidity but not mortality in blunt multiple trauma.

BACKGROUND: Multiple organ failure (OF/MOF) was found to be the major complication after blunt multiple trauma during the last 25 years and was correlated with a high mortality rate. Recently, several publications reported a decreased ARDS-related mortality, but there is little information about mortality rates from posttraumatic MOF. The purpose of this study was to describe the development of MOF-related death after blunt multiple trauma during the last 25 years. METHODS: Blunt multiple trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 points were included in this evaluation. According to the year of trauma, the population was divided into five groups: years 1975-1980 (n = 317), years 1981-1985 (n = 308), years 1986-1990 (n = 246), years 1991-1997 (n = 368), and years 1998-1999 (n = 122). Main outcome measurements were death, cause of death, and length of ICU stay. Patients dying within the first 24 hours after trauma were excluded. All data indicated in the Results section are presented as mean +/- SEM. Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA.Ordinal variables were analyzed by chi2 contingency table analysis and, if significant, subsequently by Fisher's exact test (two-tailed test, p < 0.05). RESULTS: Mean ISS remained unchanged between 1975-1980 (ISS 29 +/- 1) and 1998-1999 (ISS 31 +/- 1) (p = 0.56). During the observation period, the mean age increased from 33 +/- 1 years (1975-1980) to 40 +/- 2 years (1998-1999) (p = 0.03). The overall incidence of OF/MOF slightly increased from 25.6% (1975-1980) to 33.6% (1998-1999) (p = 0.1). Length of ICU stay was not different between 1975-1980 (LOS: 14 +/- 1 d) and 1998-1999 (LOS: 19 +/- 2 d) (p = 1.0). The overall mortality decreased significantly, from 28.7% (1975-1980) to 13.9% (1998-1999) (p < 0.001). While the mortality due to severe head injuries remained unchanged (1975-1980, 8.2%; 1998-1999, 9.0%) (p = 0.85), mortality due to OF/MOF decreased significantly (p < 0.001), from 18.0% (1975-1980) to 4.1% (1998-1999). The age of patients dying from OF/MOF increased significantly (p = 0.04) during the observation period, from 44 +/- 3 years (1975-1980) to 63 +/- 6 years (1998-1999). CONCLUSION: Although MOF incidence remains unchanged, there is a significant fall in MOF-related mortality in patients with severe trauma, and death from single organ failure is virtually absent. Severe brain injury is now the leading cause of death in patients with severe multiple injuries admitted to the ICU.     

Functional outcomes in octogenarian trauma

BACKGROUND: Outcome data on geriatric trauma patients (GTPs) (age >or= 65) focus on mortality and resource use. We examined mortality and outcome in GTPs and octogenarian trauma patients (OTPs) (age >or= 80). We hypothesized that OTPs would have worse functional outcomes than GTPs as defined by functional independence measurement (FIM) scales. METHODS: Our study was a 13-year retrospective analysis of a statewide trauma database. Isolated hip fractures and intubation with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 3 at admission were excluded. Demographic data, preexisting conditions, complications, discharge destination, mortality, and FIM were analyzed. RESULTS: OTPs constituted 17742 (40.9%) of 43297 GTPs admitted to trauma centers. Falls (64.4%) and motor vehicle collisions (24.5%) were predominant. Average Injury Severity Score (ISS) was higher in GTPs (11.5 +/- 9.2 vs. 10.8 +/- 8.3, p = 0.001). Cardiac disease was the most common preexisting condition. Diabetes, obesity, and pulmonary disease were more common in GTPs than in OTPs (p = 0.001). Dementia, congestive heart failure, and hematologic disease were more common in OTPs than in GTPs (p = 0.001). Pulmonary and infectious complications were most common and occurred with equal frequency in OTPs and GTPs. Mortality rates were higher (10.0% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.001) for OTPs overall and when stratified into low (<10), moderate (11-20), and high (>20) ISS subgroups (p = 0.001). Discharge destination was most often home (53.3% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.001) or a rehabilitation facility (20.0% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.001) for GTPs versus OTPs. OTPs were discharged to skilled nursing facilities (37.2% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.001) far more often than GTPs. FIM at discharge was lower in all categories for OTPs. Modified dependence in locomotion and transfer was seen for OTPs but not GTPs overall and when stratified by ISS subgroups (p = 0.001). Some dependence in feeding was seen for OTPs but not GTPs with high injury severity (p = 0.001). Otherwise, feeding, expression, and social independence were preserved for both OTPs and GTPs. CONCLUSION: Functional outcomes after blunt trauma are worse for OTPs; however, functional independence in feeding and social interaction are preserved in OTPs even with moderate injury severity.     

Comorbidity and age are both independent predictors of length of hospitalization in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Length of hospitalization is a good indicator of resource utilization. Older patients are increasingly suffering trauma, and comorbid medical conditions are also increasing. Our objective was to determine the separate and combined effect of these 2 factors on length of hospital stay for trauma patients in a tertiary trauma centre. METHODS: All 994 consecutive trauma patients surviving to hospital discharge between Apr. 1, 2000, and Mar. 31, 2001, were identified. Patient characteristics, injury severity and length of hospitalization were obtained from the hospital trauma registry. Each medical record was then reviewed for completeness of information and assessment of comorbid conditions. A multivariate linear regression model was developed to predict logarithmic length of stay from age and presence of a cormorbid condition while adjusting for the Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 49.7 (range from 14-100) years and median ISS was 9 (range from 1-50). At least 1 comorbid condition was present in 321 (32%) patients. Mean length of hospital stay was 15.3 days. The proportion of patients with a comorbid condition increased steadily with age, from 8.7% before the age of 55 years to 92% at 85 or more years of age (p < 0.001). According to the multivariate model, the presence of comorbidity, age and ISS were all independent predictors of hospital stay (p < 0.001). When applied to patients with the mean ISS value of 9, the model showed an increase in length of hospitalization for patients with a comorbid condition over those without; (3.6 v. 13.1 d for patients < 55 and > or = 85 yr respectively). Length of hospital stay increased particularly with neurologic and pulmonary problems. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity and age were both independently significant predictors of length of hospitalization over and beyond that which is expected based on the severity of the injuries. With an aging population, this phenomenon should severely affect resource utilization in trauma centres in the near future. Researchers should take account of both age and comorbidity in order to compare trauma populations.     

Predictors of outcome in patients requiring surgery for liver trauma

INTRODUCTION: Severe bleeding from liver injury is one of the major causes of mortality in patients with abdominal trauma. The study was undertaken to assess factors that influence outcome following liver trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of patients with liver injury treated in one surgical ward at King Edward VIII Hospital over a 7-year period (from 1998 to 2004). Data collected included demographics, intra-operative findings, operative management and outcome. RESULTS: Of a total of 478 patients with abdominal trauma, 105 (22%) were found to have liver injuries, of whom only 7 were female. Their mean age was 27.81+/-10.33 years. Injuries were due to firearms (70), stabs (26) and blunt trauma (9). Nineteen patients presented with shock (systolic BP6h in 47 patients. Forty patients required ICU management (38%) and the mean ICU stay was 6.55+/-5.65 days. Twenty patients (19%) needed a re-laparotomy for various reasons. The complication rate was 37% and the mortality rate was 20% (23% for firearms, 44% for blunt trauma and 4% for stabs). The mortality rate in patients with shock was 58% compared to 12% in those who were not shocked (p<0.0001). Mortality rate was 2, 23 and 63% for Injury Severity Score (ISS)20, respectively (group 1 versus group 2 p=0.015; group 1 versus group 3 p<0.0001 and group 2 versus group 3 p=0.001). Mortality rates for delay 6h were 28 and 9%, respectively (p=0.008). Associated injuries led to a higher mortality (3% versus 27%; p=0.006). Hospital stay was 11.27+/-12.09 days. CONCLUSIONS: Liver injuries occurred in 22% of abdominal injuries. Injury mechanism, delay before surgery, shock on admission, grade of injury, associated injury and ISS are significantly associated with outcome.     

Vital capacity as a predictor of outcome in elderly patients with rib fractures

BACKGROUND: This study tests the relationships between early bedside vital capacity (VC) measurement and morbidity, mortality, and resource consumption in geriatric blunt chest trauma patients with rib fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective study examining all patients > or = 65 years old with rib fractures who had a VC measured within 48 hours of their emergency department evaluation. Outcome variables included pulmonary complications, death from pulmonary complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients met the study criteria. The mean age was 80.2 (+/-7.4) years, the mean number of rib fractures was 3.6 (+/-1.6), and the mean ISS was 6.9 (+/-4.7). VC and the percentage of the predicted vital capacity (pVC) were both inversely correlated with LOS (p = 0.0076 and p = 0.0172, respectively). Linear regression analysis suggested that patients with a VC < 1.4 L or < 55% of their pVC had a LOS > 3 days. Mean VC was 36% higher in patients who were discharged home versus those discharged to an extended care facility (ECF; p = 0.025). There was a trend toward significance when comparing VC to ICU LOS (p = 0.079), but none in predicting pulmonary complications (p = 0.3299). No correlations between VC and mortality can be drawn given the single death in the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside VC is a simple measurement which could predict LOS in elderly patients with rib fractures and may identify those patients requiring ECF upon discharge. Further prospective study may highlight the utility of emergency room VC in determining the disposition of these patients.     

Results of resuscitation in injured elderly patients

This study assessed the results of intensive care in elderly trauma patients and quantified the different factors involved in the final outcome. It included 116 patients, aged 65 years or more, and covered a two year period. The following parameters were obtained for each patient: age, severity of trauma (ISS and SAPS), head injury (GCS), prehospital health status (ESA), survival after three months and quality of survival. Three months after trauma, overall mortality was 45.7%. Survivors were 72.8 +/- 4.9 year old, while those that died were 75.3 +/- 7.5 year old (p = 0.01). Mean ISS was 19.7 +/- 8 and mean SAPS was 9.4 +/- 3.2. The risk of death was 3.6 (1.6 to 8.1) times greater if ISS was over 15. The same risk was 4.7 (2.1 to 11.1) times greater if SAPS was over 9. GCS was 8.8 +/- 4.4 in dead patients and 12.5 +/- 2.4 in survivors (p = 0.001). The risk of death was 10.4 (4.2 to 26.2) times greater if GCS was under 8. The final prognosis could be assessed with the following exponential model: Survival = 1/(1 + exp - (8.7 - 0.07 X age - 0.07 X ISS - 2.9 X GCS*), where GCS is equal to 0 if the real GCS was under 8, and equal to 1 otherwise. The ESA did not affect mortality. Three months after trauma, the degree of independence was the same as before in 87% of survivors. It was concluded that age and the severity of trauma were the most important factors in determining prognosis in geriatric trauma patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The real predictors of disposition in patients with spinal cord injuries

OBJECTIVES: A primary goal of health care providers for managing patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) is to discharge them to a rehabilitation facility (RF) to allow for maximal functional recovery. This study was undertaken to analyze hospital mortality and disposition of patients with SCI with a specific focus on evaluating the effect of payor source on discharge to a RF. Our hypothesis was that commercial insurance (CI) would be the greatest influence of hospital disposition. METHODS: All patients under 60 years of age with SCI over a 7-year period were identified from the trauma registry; and grouped according to payor source: No insurance (NI), Government insurance (GI), No Commercial insurance (NCI) (NCI = NI + GI), and CI. RESULTS: A total of 492 patients with SCI were identified with a mean age of 33, an ISS of 29, and a hospital mortality of 7.7%. Independent predictors of mortality were cervical SCI and blood transfusions. Patients who were discharged to a RF had higher ISS and %CI with lower functional independent measurement scores compared with patients who were not discharged to a RF. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the predictors of disposition to a RF were CI (p < 0.001) and ISS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The presence of CI was an independent predictor of disposition to a RF for patients with SCI. Lack of commercial insurance clearly compromises recovery and rehabilitation of patients with SCI and predicts outcome more clearly than any other parameter. Additional funding for patients without CI is necessary to afford all with an equal opportunity for maximal functional recovery.     

Survival after trauma in geriatric patients.

In contrast to other studies, a recent report from the authors' institution has shown a good prognosis for functional recovery in geriatric patients that survive trauma. Because most survivors regained their pre-injury function, the authors examined factors related to nonsurvival in this population of 82 consecutive blunt trauma victims older than the age of 65. Seventeen patients died (21%). Compared with survivors, nonsurvivors were older, had more severe overall injury, and had more severe head and neck trauma but did not differ in severity of trauma that did not involve the head and neck, number of body regions injured, mechanism of injury, or incidence of surgery after injury. Nonsurvivors experienced more frequent complications (82% vs. 33%, p less than 0.05), including a higher incidence of cardiac complications (53% vs. 15%, p less than 0.05) and ventilator dependence for 5 or more days (41% vs. 14%, p less than 0.05). Mortality rates were increased in patients who were 80 years of age or older compared with those ages 65-79 (46% vs. 10%, p less than 0.01), despite injury of similar severity. More frequent complications may contribute to an increased mortality rate in the older group, including an increased incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation (36% vs. 12%, p less than 0.025), cardiac complications (54% vs. 10%, p less than 0.01), and pneumonia (36% vs. 16%, p less than 0.06). Severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] greater than or equal to 25) older than 80 years old had a mortality rate of 80%, and the survivors required permanent nursing home care. Discriminant analysis yielded a reliable method of differentiating survivors from nonsurvivors based on age, ISS, and the presence of cardiac and septic complications. To assess the accuracy of the discriminant function, 61 consecutive patients admitted during 1985 were reviewed prospectively. Discriminant scoring predicted outcome correctly in 92% of these patients. A Geriatric Trauma Survival Score (GTSS) based on the discriminant function was calculated for each of the 143 patients studied and was highly correlated with mortality rate (r = 0.99, p less than 0.001). Thus, the GTSS may serve as a valuable tool for evaluating death in geriatric trauma victims. Furthermore, because complications are potentially avoidable and contribute to increased mortality rates, routine aggressive care for geriatric patients with moderate overall injury is indicated.     

Intensive geriatric rehabilitation of hip fracture patients

We determined the effect of geriatric rehabilitation of hip fracture patients on mortality, length of hospital stay, and functional recovery. In a randomized, controlled intervention study, 243 community dwelling hip fracture patients over 64 years of age were randomly assigned to 2 rehabilitation groups. The intervention group (n = 120) was referred to a geriatric ward for team rehabilitation, and the controls (n = 123) to local hospital wards for standard care. The median length of total hospital stay after a hip fracture operation was 34 (95% CI 28-38) days in the intervention group and 42 (95% CI 35-48) days in the control group (p = 0.05). The intervention group recovered instrumental activities of daily living faster (p = 0.05). Direct costs of medical care during the first year did not differ remarkably.     

Intensive geriatric rehabilitation of hip fracture patients: a randomized,controlled trial

We determined the effect of geriatric rehabilitation of hip fracture patients on mortality, length of hospital stay, and functional recovery. In a randomized, controlled intervention study, 243 community dwelling hip fracture patients over 64 years of age were randomly assigned to 2 rehabilitation groups. The intervention group (n = 120) was referred to a geriatric ward for team rehabilitation, and the controls (n = 123) to local hospital wards for standard care. The median length of total hospital stay after a hip fracture operation was 34 (95% CI 28-38) days in the intervention group and 42 (95% CI 35-48) days in the control group (p = 0.05). The intervention group recovered instrumental activities of daily living faster (p = 0.05). Direct costs of medical care during the first year did not differ remarkably.     

Paying the price of excluding patients from a trauma registry

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of different trauma registry exclusion criteria on the assessment of trauma populations and outcome. METHODS: All patients admitted to a Canadian regional trauma center from April 1, 1993 to March 31, 2002 with a diagnosis of trauma (ICD-9 codes 800 to 959) were reviewed. TOTAL included everyone. REGISTRY included only patients meeting any of four criteria: death during hospital stay, transfer received from another hospital, admission to the intensive care unit, or hospital stay of 3 days or more. NOHIP excluded patients with isolated hip fracture. REG/NOHIP combined both. ISS12 and ISS15 excluded patients with ISS <12 and 15, respectively. RESULTS: There were 6,839 trauma patients. The percentage of excluded patients by group was: REGISTRY, 21.2%; NOHIP, 14.7%; REG/NOHIP, 34.9%; ISS12, 75%; and ISS15, 80.3%. Median length of stay was 7 days. Exclusions represented a total number of hospitalization days varying from 1.9% to 65.5% of TOTAL. Mortality was 6.9% for TOTAL, 8.6% for REGISTRY (p < 0.001), 5.7% for NOHIP (p = 0.009), 7.5% for REG/NOHIP (p=NS), 16.1% for ISS12 (p < 0.001), and 20.4% for ISS15 (p < 0.001). In groups with exclusions, transfer to long-term care varied from 0.14% to 23.5% in the excluded patients. For rehabilitation, these percentages varied from 0.14% to 17.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Registry exclusion criteria significantly alter the apparent severity of injury and resource utilization. The use of divergent exclusion criteria in the analysis of trauma registry data may be misleading.     

Study of the outcome of patients transferred to a level I hospital after stabilization at an outlying hospital in a rural setting

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics and outcome of transferred trauma patients in a rural setting. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of all trauma admissions to a rural Level I trauma center to examine a 3.5-year (1993-1996) comparison of trauma patients admitted directly with those transferred (RTTP) after being initially stabilized at an outlying hospital. We used prehospital times, Injury Severity Score (ISS), LD50ISS (the ISS at which 50% of patients died), Revised Trauma Score, probability of survival, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and observed survival as main outcome measures. RESULTS: RTTPs (39.4%) spent an average of 182+/-139 minutes at the outlying hospital and 72+/-42 minutes in transport to the trauma center. Proportionately more head/neck and patients with multiple injuries composed the RTTP group. The RTTP were more severely injured (ISS 11.1+/-8.5; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 16.2+/-5.8; Revised Trauma Score 7.44+/-1.1) than the trauma patients admitted directly (ISS 7.9+/-5.3; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 13.1+/-6.3; Revised Trauma Score 7.8+/-0.4; p < 0.05). However, both groups had the same LD50ISS (ISS = 35). When logistic regression was applied with death as the dependent variable, both ISS and age contributed significantly (p = 0.0001) but transfer status did not (p = 0.473). CONCLUSION: Rural trauma centers admit a high percentage of RTTP. These RTTP have a higher injury severity and acuity than their trauma patients admitted directly counterparts. Trauma care in rural areas that involves initial stabilization at outlying hospitals does not adversely affect mortality.     

A population-based study of geriatric trauma in a rural state

BACKGROUND: Urban geriatric trauma patients are known to die more often than their younger counterparts. Little is known of the fate of geriatric trauma patients in a rural environment where delays to definitive treatment are frequent. We hypothesized that rural trauma patients would do worse than their urban counterparts because of prolonged delays to definitive care. METHODS: Five-year retrospective analysis of all trauma deaths occurring within a rural state and retrospective outcome analysis of trauma patients admitted to a tertiary care facility who were less than 55 years old (defined as young) and 55 or more years old (defined as old). Outcome analysis was performed comparing old and young rural hospitalized patients to the Major Trauma Outcome Study data set collected in major urban trauma centers. RESULTS: Of the total trauma deaths in the state, 32.5% were old. Old patients were less likely to die at the scene of the injury than were their younger counterparts (R2 = 0.84, p < 0.001). Hospitalized old patients had a significantly higher mean Revised Trauma Score and a significantly lower Injury Severity Score, a higher complication rate, and a higher mortality rate than did hospitalized young patients. The young group had a significantly better survival (W = 0.59, Z = -3.49, p = 0.0001) than the MTOS data set, but the old group had a significantly worse survival (W = -1.8, Z = -3.49, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a rural environment, old trauma patients die more commonly in the hospital than their younger counterparts, who die more commonly at the scene. Old trauma patients who die in the hospital were less severely injured than their younger counterparts who died in the hospital. Old patients admitted to this rural trauma center have a significantly worse survival than their urban counterparts despite the fact that young rural trauma patients do significantly better than their urban counterparts. Understanding the demographics of rural geriatric trauma may be useful in allocating resources in rural trauma system design. It must be understood that despite relatively low injury severity and physiologic stability, there is a significant potential for rural geriatric trauma patients to do poorly.     

Differences in mortality predictions between Injury Severity Score triplets: a significant flaw

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the validity of similar Injury Severity Scores (ISS) generated by different Abbreviated Injury Scale triplets. METHODS: A cohort of trauma patients admitted to a single major trauma service between 1995 and 2002 was studied retrospectively. Mortality rates were compared for groups with identical ISS scores but different triplets. RESULTS: For 2,223 of the 5,946 trauma patients studied, 12 ISS scores were generated by two different Abbreviated Injury Scale triplets. Six of these ISS totals showed significant differences in mortality depending on the triplet source. One of the most striking was ISS 25 (triplet 5,0,0), with a mortality of 20.6%, as compared with 0% for triplet 4,3,0 (p = 0.005). The other statistically significant mortality differences for ISS totals were ISS 27-28.6% (5,1,1) versus 7.4% (3,3,3) (p = 0.05); ISS 29-30.3% (5,2,0) versus 4.6% (4,3,2) (p = 0.002); ISS 33-50% (4,4,1) versus 6.7% (5,2,2) (p = 0.034); ISS 34-45.2% (5,3,0) versus 4.3% (4,3,3) (p = 0.0009); and ISS 41-60% (5,4,0) versus 11.1% (4,4,3) (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rates are significantly different between pairs of triplets that generate the same ISS total. Caution must be used in the interpretation of outcomes from ISS values generated by different triplets.     

Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, the elderly will constitute a prominent proportion of trauma patients. The elderly suffer more severe consequences from traumatic injuries compared with the young, presumably resulting in increased resource use. In this study, we sought to examine ICU resource use in trauma on the basis of age and injury severity. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of trauma registry data prospectively collected on 26,237 blunt trauma patients admitted to all trauma centers (n = 26) in one state over 24 months (January 1996-December 1997). Age-dependent and injury severity-dependent differences in mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Elderly (age > or = 65 years, n = 7,117) patients had significantly higher mortality rates than younger (age < 65 years) trauma patients after stratification by Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score, and other preexisting comorbidities. Age > 65 years was associated with a two- to threefold increased mortality risk in mild (ISS < 15, 3.2% vs. 0.4%; < 0.001), moderate (ISS 15-29, 19.7% vs. 5.4%; < 0.001), and severe traumatic injury (ISS > or = 30, 47.8% vs. 21.7%; < 0.001) compared with patients aged < 65 years. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that elderly patients had a nearly twofold increased mortality risk (odds ratio, 1.87; confidence interval, 1.60-2.18; < 0.001). Elderly patients also had significantly longer hospital LOS after stratifying for severity of injury by ISS (1.9 fewer days in the age 18-45 group, 0.89 fewer days in the age 46-64 group compared with the age > or = 65 group). Mortality rates were higher for men than for women only in the ISS < 15 (4.4% vs. 2.6%, < 0.001) and ISS 15 to 29 (21.7% vs. 17.6%, = 0.031) groups. ICU LOS was significantly decreased in elderly patients with ISS > or = 30. CONCLUSION: Age is confirmed as an independent predictor of outcome (mortality) in trauma after stratification for injury severity in this largest study of elderly trauma patients to date. Elderly patients with severe injury (ISS > 30) have decreased ICU resource use secondary to associated increased mortality rates.     

Air versus ground transport of major trauma patients to a tertiary trauma centre: a province-wide comparison using TRISS analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of adult (aged > 15 yr) blunt trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) = 12 who were transported to a single tertiary trauma centre (TTC) by helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) versus those transported by ground ambulance. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all adult (aged > 15 yr) trauma patients between March 27, 1998 and March 28, 2002 with an ISS score = 12, as identified through the provincial trauma registry. We used the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology to determine a difference in outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS: We identified 823 patients; of these, we excluded 32 (3.9%) penetrating trauma patients. Of the blunt trauma cases (n = 791) 237 (30%) patients were transported by air and 554 were transported by ground (70%). A total of 770 (97.3%) patients were eligible for TRISS analysis. Using the TRISS methodology, the air group had a Z statistic of 2.77, yielding a W score of 6.40. This compared with the ground transport group, whose Z statistic was 1.97 and W score was 2.39. CONCLUSION: The transport of trauma patients with an ISS = 12 by a provincially dedicated rotor wing air medical service was associated with statistically significantly better outcomes than those transported by standard ground ambulance. This is the first large Canadian study to specifically compare the outcome of patients transported by ground with those transported by air.     

Geriatric falls: injury severity is high and disproportionate to mechanism

OBJECTIVE: Falls are a well-known source of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Fall-related injury severity in this group, however, is less clear, particularly as it relates to type of fall. Our purpose is to explore the relationship between mechanism of fall and both pattern and severity of injury in geriatric patients as compared with a younger cohort. METHODS: Our trauma registry was queried for all patients evaluated by the trauma service over a 412-year period (1994-1998). Two cohorts were formed on the basis of age greater than 65 or less than or equal to 65 years and compared as to mechanism, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Scale score, and mortality. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1,512 patients were evaluated, 333 greater than 65 years and 1,179 less than or equal to 65 years of age. Falls were the injury mechanism in 48% of the older group and 7% of the younger group (p < 0.05). Falls in the older group constituted 65% of patients with ISS >15, with 32% of all falls resulting in serious injury (ISS >15). In contrast, falls in the younger group constituted only 11% of ISS >15 patients, with falls causing serious injury only 15% of the time (both p < 0.05). Notably, same-level falls resulted in serious injury 30% of the time in the older group versus 4% in the younger group (p < 0.05), and were responsible for an ISS >15 30-fold more in the older group (31% vs. <1%; p < 0.05). Abbreviated Injury Scale evaluation revealed more frequent head/neck (47% vs. 22%), chest (23% vs. 9%), and pelvic/extremity (27% vs. 15%) injuries in the older group for all falls (all p < 0.05). The mean ISS for same-level falls in the older group was twice that for the younger group (9.28 vs. 4.64, p < 0.05), whereas there was no difference in mean ISS between multilevel and same-level falls within the older group itself (10.12 vs. 9.28, p > 0.05). The fall-related death rate was higher in the older group (7% vs. 4%), with falls seven times more likely to be the cause of death compared with the younger group (55% vs. 7.5%) (both p < 0.05). Same-level falls as a cause of death was 10 times more common in the elderly (25% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Falls among the elderly, including same-level falls, are a common source of both high injury severity and mortality, much more so than in younger patients. A different pattern of injury between older and younger fall patients also exists.     

Predicting the need for early tracheostomy: a multifactorial analysis of 992 intubated trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy has few, severe risks, while prolonged endotracheal intubation causes morbidity. The need for tracheostomy was assessed, based on early clinical parameters. METHODS: Adult trauma patients (January 1994-August 2004), intubated for resuscitation, ventilated >24 hours, were retrospectively evaluated for demographics, physiology, brain, and pulmonary injury. Tracheostomy patients were compared with those without. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and multivariate logistic regression were used with statistical significance at p < 0.05.* RESULTS: Of 992 patients, 430 (43%) underwent tracheostomy at 9.22 +/- 5.7 days. Risk factors were age (45.6* +/- 18.8 vs. 36.7 +/- 15.9, OR: 2.1 (18 years increments), ISS (30.3* +/- 12.5 vs. 22.0 +/- 10.3, OR: 2.1 (12u increments), damage control (DC) [68%*(n = 51) vs. 32%*(n = 51), OR: 3.8], craniotomy [70%*(n = 21) versus 30%(n = 9), OR: 2.6], and intracranial pressure monitor (ICP) [65.4%*(n = 87) vs. 34.6%(n = 46), OR: 2.1]. A 100% tracheostomy rate (n = 30, 3.0%) occurred with ISS (injury severity score) = 75, ISS >or=50, and age >or=55, admit/24 hour GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) = 3 and age >or=70, AIS abdomen, chest or extremities >or=5 and age >or=60, bilateral pulmonary contusions (BPC) and >or=8 rib fractures, craniotomy and age >or=50, craniotomy with intracranial pressure (ICP) and age >or=40, or craniotomy and GCS or=90% (n = 105, 10.6%) was found with ISS >or=54, ISS >or=40, and age >or=40, admit/24 hour GCS = 3 and age >or=55, paralysis and age >or=40, BPC and age >or=55.A tracheostomy rate >or=80% (n = 248, 25.0%) occurred with ISS >or=38, age >or=80, admit/24 hour GCS = 3 and age >or=45, DC and age >or=50, BPC and age >or=50, aspiration and age >or=55, craniotomy with ICP, craniotomy with GCS or=90% risk undergo early tracheostomy and that it is considered in the >or=80% risk group to potentially decreased morbidity, increased patient comfort, and optimize resource utilization.