Metoclopramide decreases emesis but increases sedation in tramadol patient-controlled analgesia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical benefits and disadvantages of adding metoclopramide to tramadol for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). METHODS: Forty adult patients, undergoing elective arthroplasties, were recruited into this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. During general anesthesia all patients received 2.5 mg x kg(-1) of tramadol as a loading dose at the beginning of wound closure. In the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) patients were randomly allocated to receive PCA containing either 20 mg tramadol + 1 mg metoclopramide per millilitre (n = 20, Group T+M) or tramadol 20 mg per millilitre (n = 20, Group T). The PCA setup was 1 mL/bolus with a lockout interval of five minutes. A blinded investigator assessed the vital signs, visual analogue scale, and severity of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting in the PACU. The PCA demand and delivery, overall satisfaction rate and adverse effects were recorded in the PACU and on postoperative days one and two. RESULTS: Nausea/vomiting scores were more severe (1.7 +/- 1.0 vs 0.2 +/- 0.5, 2.3 +/- 1.2 vs 0.6 +/- 0.6, 1.9 +/- 0.9 vs 0.2 +/- 0.5, at 12 hr, 18 hr, 24 hr, respectively, P < 0.05) and more frequent (7/20 vs 1/20, 5/20 vs 0/20 for nausea and vomiting respectively, P < 0.05) on postoperative day one in Group T compared to Group T+M. However, the incidence of sedation was higher in Group T+M (7/20 vs 1/20, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and severity of nausea/vomiting decreased if metoclopramide was added to tramadol for PCA. An increased incidence of sedation was noticed with this drug combination.     

Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with tramadol or morphine

PURPOSE: To compared the clinical efficacy of tramadol and morphine using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) delivery system. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double blind study, we evaluated 80 adult patients scheduled for elective hip or knee arthroplasty with general inhalational anesthesia. When patients complained of pain in the recovery room, patients were randomized to receive either tramadol or morphine by titration in 30 min to achieve analgesia (VAS < or =4). Equivalent volumes containing either 30 mg x ml(-1) tramadol or 1 mg x ml(-1) morphine were used for PCA with a lockout interval of 10 min. The patients were followed six-hourly for 48 hr for VAS, satisfaction rate, analgesic dose, and side effects. RESULTS: Patients obtained adequate analgesia with either drug. More patients had very good satisfaction scores in the morphine group in the recovery room (43% vs. 23%, P<0.05) and at 24 hr (40% vs. 20%, P<0.05) than those in the tramadol group. More nausea was evident in the tramadol group (48% vs. 11% in recovery room and 28% vs. 12% in 24 hr, P<0.05) than in the morphine group. Vomiting was also more (28% vs. 5% in recovery room, 15% vs. 3% in 24 hr, P<0.05). Morphine produced more sleepiness (45% vs. 23% in recovery room, P<0.05 and 35% vs. 15% in 24 hr, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Tramadol PCA can provide effective analgesia following major orthopedic surgery provided sufficiently high doses are given for loading and by patient demand. However, the incidence of nausea/vomiting is also higher causing decreased satisfaction.     

Intraoperative loading attenuates nausea and vomiting of tramadol patient-controlled analgesia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the adverse effect profile of tramadol by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with administration of the loading dose either intraoperatively or postoperatively. METHODS: Sixty adult patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, double blind study. The patients were anesthetized in a similar manner. At the beginning of wound closure, the patients were randomly allocated to receive 5 mg x kg(-1) tramadol (Group 1) or normal saline (Group 2). In the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), when patients in either group complained of pain, 30 mg x ml(-1) tramadol i.v. were given every three minutes until visual analogue scale (VAS) 3, followed by tramadol PCA with bolus dose of 30 mg and five minute lockout interval. Pain control and adverse effect assessments were done in the PACU and every six hours for 48 hr post drug by an independent observer. RESULTS: The loading dose was 290 +/- 45 mg in Group 1 and 315 +/- 148 mg in Group 2. In PACU, more nausea/vomiting both in terms of incidence (13/30, 43% vs 2/30, 6.6%, P < 0.05) and severity (nausea/vomiting score 2.5 +/- 2.0 vs 0.2 +/- 0.6, P < 0.05) was observed in patients with postoperative loading than in those with intraoperative loading of tramadol. CONCLUSION: Administering the loading dose of tramadol during surgery decreases the nausea/vomiting associated with high dose of tramadol and improves the quality of tramadol PCA in the relief of postoperative pain.     

Patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol versus tramadol plus lysine acetyl salicylate

By using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) delivery system, we compared the clinical advantages and disadvantages of PCA with tramadol and PCA with a mixture of tramadol plus lysine acetyl salicylate (a soluble aspirin). Fifty adult patients who had undergone major orthopedic surgeries were enrolled into a prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study. The general anesthesia was performed in a standard manner. At the beginning of wound closure, an equal volume dose of either tramadol 2.5 mg/kg (Group 1) or tramadol 1.25 mg/kg + lysine acetyl salicylate 12.5 mg/kg mixture (Group 2) was administered slowly IV. These solutions were continued postoperatively for IV PCA. Pain control, patient satisfaction, vital signs, and adverse effects were assessed for 48 h. Visual Analog Scale 相似文献   

Tramadol 2.5 mg·kg−1 appears to be the optimal intraoperative loading dose before patient-controlled analgesia

PURPOSE: We previously established that a 5 mg x kg(-1) intraoperative dose can reduce the nausea/vomiting associated with tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). This study was conducted to identify the most appropriate initial dose to improve the quality of tramadol PCA. METHODS: During general anesthesia, 60 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty were randomly allocated to receive 1.25 mg x kg(-1) (Group I), 2.5 mg x kg(-1) (Group II), 3.75 mg x kg(-1) (Group III), or 5 mg x kg(-1) (Group IV) tramadol. The emergence condition was recorded. The titration of additional tramadol 20 mg + metoclopramide 1 mg doses by PCA every five minutes was performed in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) until the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was < or = 3. An investigator blinded to study group recorded the VAS and side effects every ten minutes. RESULTS: In the PACU, significantly more tramadol (8.4 +/- 3.1 vs 4.3 +/- 2.1, 2.5 +/- 1.8, and 0.4 +/- 0.3, P < 0.05), and a higher incidence (15/15 vs 5/15, 3/15, and 2/15, P < 0.05) of PCA use was observed in Group I compared to Groups II-IV. VAS was significantly higher in Group I than in Groups II-IV at zero and ten minutes (P < 0.05). Unexpected delayed emergence anesthesia (> 30 min) was observed in Group III (n = 1) and in Group IV (n = 2). Sedation was more important in Groups III and IV than in Groups I and II (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When considering efficacy and side-effect profile, 2.5 mg x kg(-1) of tramadol is the optimal intraoperative dose of this drug to provide effective postoperative analgesia with minimal sedation.     

Intravenous acetaminophenvs oral ibuprofen in combination with morphine PCIA after Cesarean delivery

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of iv acetaminophen with those of oral ibuprofen with respect to postoperative pain control and morphine requirements in patients receiving morphine patient-controlled iv analgesia (PCIA) after Cesarean delivery. METHODS: Forty-five term patients scheduled for Cesarean delivery were randomized to receive acetaminophen 1 g iv every six hours plus oral placebo (group A) or ibuprofen 400 mg po every six hours plus iv placebo (group I); the first dose of study drug was given 30 min preoperatively. Postoperatively, all patients received PCIA for 48 hr using morphine bolus dose 2 mg iv, lockout interval ten minutes, and no basal infusion. Visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 to 10) at rest and morphine requirements were recorded every hour for four hours then every four hours for a total of 48 hr postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was recorded on a ten-point scale (from 1 to 10) 48 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: Visual analogue scale scores decreased similarly in both groups over time, however, there were no differences between groups at any time during the study period (estimated marginal means: 1.4 +/- SEM 0.2 vs 1.9 +/- SEM 0.2 for groups A and I, respectively, P = 0.124). Cumulative doses of postoperative morphine were 98 +/- 37 vs 93 +/- 33 mg for groups A and I, respectively (P = 0.628). Patient satisfaction with analgesia was high in both groups (9 +/- 1 vs 9 +/- 1, P = 0.93). CONCLUSION: Intravenous acetaminophen is a reasonable alternative to oral ibuprofen as an adjunct to morphine patient-controlled analgesia after Cesarean delivery.     

Comparison of tramadol and tramadol/droperidol mixture for patient-controlled analgesia

Purpose

To compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of tramadolvs tramadol and dropendol for post-operative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

Methods

Randomised. double-blind study. Thirty-four patients undergoing elective colorectal or head and neck surgery were allocated to Group 1 (n = 18, PCA bolus 10 mg tramadol) or Group 2 (n = 16, PCA bolus 10 mg tramadol + 0.1 mg dropendol). Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl and thiopentone and maintained with O₂, N₂,O plus enflurane or isoflurane withiv morphine at doses decided by the attending anaesthetists. Muscle relaxation was achieved with atracunum or vecuronium. Patients were observed four-hourly for pain using an 1 1 -point verbal rating scale (VRS). Nausea and vomiting, and sedation were assessed using four-point scales post-operatively. Vital signs. request for rescue anti-emetic and analgesic, and overall satisfaction were recorded.

Results

The mean nausea scores were lower in Group 2 (1.00 ± 1.33vs 0.06 ± 0.25 at 0–8 hr, 1.22 ± 1.93 vs 0.06 ± 0.25 at 8–16 hr. P < 0 01; 0.81 ± 1.68 vs 0 at 32–40 hr, P < 0.05; Group 1 vs Group 2). The vomiting scores were also lower (0.50 ± 1.04vs 0 at 0–8 hr, 0.67 ± 1.50 vs 0 at 8–16 hr, P < 0.05: Group 1 vs Group 2). Seven (39%) patients in Group 1. but none in Group 2 requested rescue anti-emetic (P < 0.01). There were no differences in VRS. sedation score, overall satisfaction or vital signs.

Conclusion

Tramadol and dropendol combination is superior to tramadol alone for post-operative PCA. It provides a similar quality of analgesia with less nausea and vomiting and without an increase in sedation.     

The addition of a tramadol infusion to morphine patient-controlled analgesia after abdominal surgery: a double-blinded,placebo-controlled randomized trial

In this double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, we tested whether the addition of tramadol to morphine for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) resulted in improved analgesia efficacy and smaller morphine requirements compared with morphine PCA alone after abdominal surgery in adults. Sixty-nine patients were randomly allocated into two groups, each receiving morphine 1 mg/mL via PCA after surgery. The tramadol group received an intraoperative initial loading dose of tramadol (1 mg/kg) and a postoperative infusion of tramadol at 0.2 mg. kg(-1). h(-1). The control group received an intraoperative equivalent volume of normal saline and a postoperative saline infusion. Postoperatively, tramadol was associated with improved subjective analgesic efficacy (P = 0.031) and there was significantly less PCA morphine use in the tramadol group (P = 0.023). No differences between the groups were found with regard to nausea, antiemetic use, sedation, or quality of recovery (all P > 0.05). We conclude that a tramadol infusion combined with PCA morphine improves analgesia and reduces morphine requirements after abdominal surgery compared with morphine PCA alone. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we determined whether adding a second pain-killing drug, tramadol, could improve pain relief after major surgery in patients receiving morphine patient-controlled analgesia. We found that patients receiving tramadol had significantly better opinions of their pain relief and used significantly less morphine with no increase in side effects.     

Perioperative antinociceptive effects of tramadol. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with morphine

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of tramadol and morphine for intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study 100 patients were allocated randomly into two groups. Ten minutes before induction of anaesthesia, patients in group 1 received 100 mg tramadol and those in group 2 received 10 mg morphine i.v. Anaesthesia was induced with 5 mg.kg-1 thiopental and was maintained with O2, N2O plus isoflurane with additional doses of tramadol or morphine as decided by the attending anaesthetist. Postoperatively, patients in group 1 and group 2 received tramadol and morphine, respectively, from a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Pain, analgesic consumption, vital signs and side effects were recorded postoperatively for 24 hr. RESULTS: Intraoperative consumption of tramadol and morphine were 137 +/- 37 and 12.2 +/- 3 mg, respectively. Compared with morphine, patients receiving tramadol had higher blood pressures and required greater mean ETisQ to control haemodynamic variables (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, there were no differences in observer pain score or visual analogue pain score during the first 24 hr between groups except at 30, 45, and 90 min where patients in the tramadol group reported higher pain scores (P < 0.05). The cumulative, 24 hr PCA consumption was 111 +/- 93 and 7.5 +/- 6.6 mg of tramadol and morphine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between the use of tramadol and morphine to treat pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 90 min after the end of surgery. Morphine was more effective than tramadol as an intraoperative analgesic.     

Intrathecal morphine provides better postoperative analgesia than psoas compartment block after primary hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE: Intrathecal morphine and psoas compartment block represent two accepted techniques to provide postoperative analgesia after hip arthroplasty. We designed a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study to compare these two techniques. METHODS: Patients scheduled for primary hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia were randomized to receive either an intrathecal administration of 0.1 mg morphine (Group I, n = 27) or a psoas compartment block with ropivacaine 0.475% 25 mL (Group II, n = 26). Pain scores, morphine consumption, associated side-effects were assessed for 48 hr postoperatively. In addition, patient's acceptance and satisfaction of the postoperative analgesic technique were also recorded. RESULTS: During the first 24 hr, pain scores (3.3 +/- 9.6 mm vs 22.8 +/- 27.1 at H+6, 3.3 +/- 8.3 mm vs 25 +/- 26.7 mm at H+12, 7 +/- 14.9 mm vs 21.9 +/- 29 mm at H+18) and morphine consumption (0.56 +/- 2.12 mg vs 9.42 +/- 10.13 mg) were lower in Group I than in Group II. Urinary retention was the more frequent side-effect occurring in 37% of cases in Group I vs 11.5% in Group II (P < 0.05). No major complication occurred. Despite better analgesia provided by the use of intrathecal morphine, there was no difference in the satisfaction scores between groups. CONCLUSION: 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine administration provides better postoperative analgesia than single-shot psoas compartment block after primary hip arthroplasty.     

Patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl provides effective analgesia for second trimester labour: a randomized controlled study

PURPOSE: To examine dose and lockout intervals for effective fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in second trimester genetic termination of pregnancy, and compare three different fentanyl PCA regimes with morphine PCA. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized study, 60 ASA physical status I-II patients received one of three fentanyl PCAs or morphine PCA. Labour was induced with prostaglandins and PCA use continued until delivery. Within two hours following delivery, four visual analogue scales (VAS) were administered measuring anticipated pain, pain relief in labour and delivery, and overall satisfaction. The drug delivery/demand ratio for two hours preceding delivery was obtained from the PCA pump. The outcome variables were analyzed using the Chi square test and analysis of variance as appropriate. RESULTS: The delivery/demand ratio was 0.71 +/- 0.27 (mean +/- standard deviation) for morphine; 0.67 +/- 0.21 for fentanyl 50 micro g, lockout six-minute; 0.63 +/- 0.21 for fentanyl 25 micro g, lockout three-minute; and 0.81 +/- 0.17 for fentanyl 50 micro g, lockout three-minute groups. We found no significant differences among the four groups with respect to using delivery/demand ratio as a measure of pain relief. Morphine had the highest rate of side effects compared to fentanyl. There was strong evidence of differences among groups with regard to patient satisfaction and expected pain, and moderate evidence of differences in the delivery and labour pain scores. CONCLUSION: This study found PCA fentanyl 50 micro g with a lockout period of six minutes provided satisfactory analgesia for second trimester labour.     

Intraoperative clonidine enhances postoperative morphine patient-controlled analgesia

In this prospective study, the postoperative analgesic effects of intraoperative iv clonidine were evaluated. Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to either balanced anaesthesia with iv clonidine (Group 1) or balanced anaesthesia alone (Group 2). A PCA infuser was connected immediately after tracheal extubation. It was programmed to deliver morphine "on demand" iv boluses at doses of 1 mg for patients greater than 65 yr and 1.5 mg for women or 2 mg for men less than 65 yr old. A blinded observer assessed postoperative analgesia by recording the analgesic demands (both met and unmet), patient pain scores, sedation scores, and any side effects during the first 36 hr after surgery. Intraoperative clonidine reduced the number of analgesic demands during the observation period (45 +/- 27 demands in Group 1 vs 81 +/- 60 in Group 2, P = 0.0001). This resulted in a reduction in morphine delivered (55.4 +/- 30.6 mg vs 67.1 +/- 45.1 mg, P less than 0.05), mainly during the first 12 hr (19.7 +/- 11.1 mg vs 27.6 +/- 18.1, mg P less than 0.001) and the unmet demand rate was also reduced at all time intervals (P less than 0.01). Clonidine did not exacerbate sedation or side effects. However, clonidine provided better analgesia in men and in patients less than 65 yr of age. Intraoperative iv clonidine enhances morphine analgesia after abdominal surgery.     

Intrathecal sufentanil-morphine shortens the duration of intubation and improves analgesia in fasttrack cardiac surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of combined intrathecal morphine and sufentanil with low-dose iv sufentanil during propofol anesthesia for fast-track cardiac surgery. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with normal cardiopulmonary function who were scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were randomized to receive either a continuous iv infusion of sufentanil 0.9 to 1.8 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (13 patients), or a single lumbar intrathecal dose of sufentanil 50 micro g and morphine 500 micro g (11 patients). We prospectively studied perioperative analgesia, time to extubation and early postoperative maximal inspiratory capacity in the two groups. In the intensive care unit, the medical and nursing staff were blinded to the analgesic technique. RESULTS: Intrathecal sufentanil morphine allowed a shorter duration of intubation (104 +/- 56.5 min vs 213 +/- 104 min; P = 0.01), reduced the need for postoperative analgesia with nicomorphine (equipotent to morphine) (0.7 +/- 0.4 mg x hr(-1) vs 1.2 +/- 0.4 mg x hr(-1); P = 0.008) and improved postoperative maximal inspiratory capacity (53.4 +/- 16.1 vs 38.4 +/- 12.5% of the norm; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In low-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery, combined intrathecal sufentanil and morphine with a target-controlled infusion of propofol satisfies the goals of fast-track cardiac surgery.     

Comparison of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol versus morphine after microvascular breast reconstruction

Tramadol is a weak centrally acting analgesic and it might provide efficacious postoperative pain relief with minimal sedative effects in the use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Sixty women scheduled to undergo microvascular breast reconstruction under standard general anaesthesia were enrolled in a study on the performance of patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol or morphine with special emphasis on drug- and technique-related side-effects. Seven patients were re-operated within the same day, leaving 25 patients in the tramadol group and 28 in the morphine group for comparison. When postoperative pain occurred, loading doses of either 10 mg tramadol or 1 mg morphine intravenous increments were administered in a double-blind fashion until the pain control was judged to be satisfactory by the patient. After that the patients received tramadol or morphine by a PCA apparatus (lockout 5 min, tramadol 450 microg kg-1, morphine 45 microg kg-1 bolus). In addition, all patients received 500 mg paracetamol rectally, three times a day. The potency ratio of tramadol to morphine was found to be between 8.5 : 1 (loading) and 11 : 1 (PCA). There was neither a significant difference between the groups in the overall satisfaction of the analgesic medication nor in the visual analogue and verbal rate scales for pain. Women in the tramadol group had more nausea and vomiting during the administration of loading doses (P < 0.05) and more patients in the tramadol group (7) than in the morphine group (3) (NS) wanted to discontinue the PCA therapy before the end of the study due to nausea. Sedation or blurred vision prevented the performance of the psychomotor tests in 22 and 32% of the tramadol and morphine patients, respectively. The remaining patients performed similarly in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. In women receiving intravenous PCA for analgesia after microvascular breast reconstruction tramadol and morphine provided comparable postoperative analgesia with similar sedative effects. However, tramadol was associated with a disturbingly high incidence of nausea and vomiting.     

Preemptive diclofenac reduces morphine use after remifentanil-based anaesthesia for tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effect of preincisional rectal diclofenac on pain scores and postoperative morphine requirements of children undergoing tonsillectomy after remifentanil-propofol anaesthesia in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Induction and maintenance of anaesthesia were with remifentanil and propofol. Forty children were randomly assigned into two groups before incision. The diclofenac group (n=20) received diclofenac suppositories (approximately 1 mg x kg(-1)) and the control group (n=20) received no treatment. Following discontinuation of remifentanil, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine (a loading dose 50 micro g x kg(-1), a background infusion 4 micro g x kg(-1) x h(-1) and a demand dose 20 micro g x kg(-1) with 5-min intervals) was started. We assessed pain score [verbal analogue scales (VAS), 0-10] and sedation level at 5-min intervals and recorded the total morphine consumption of the first hour in the PACU. Patients were discharged to the ward with a new PCA morphine programme (a demand dose 20 micro g.kg-1 with a lockout time of 30 min, for 4 h), and total morphine consumption was recorded. RESULTS: The mean VAS score of the diclofenac group was significantly lower than the control group on arrival in the PACU (2.85 +/- 0.77, 7.60 +/- 0.83, respectively, P < 0.01) and it remained significantly lower in the PACU stay of the children. The mean total morphine consumption of the diclofenac group was less than the control group in the PACU (130.33 +/- 11.26 and 169.92 +/- 9.22, respectively, P=0.012) and the ward (50.80 +/- 11.38 and 87.77 +/- 10.55, respectively, P=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive diclofenac given rectally reduced pain intensity and morphine requirements of children anaesthetized with remifentanil for tonsillectomy.     

Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour: optimizing drug delivery regimens

PURPOSE: A pilot study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of two regimens of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with remifentanil for labour analgesia. METHODS: Twenty term parturients requesting labour analgesia were randomized to receive one of two regimens of intravenous remifentanil. The initial settings in both groups consisted of an infusion of 0.025 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), a PCA bolus of 0.25 microg x kg(-1) and a lockout interval of two minutes. In Group A, the infusion was increased in a stepwise manner from 0.025 to 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) as required; the bolus was kept constant at 0.25 microg x kg(-1). In Group B, the bolus was increased from 0.25 to 0.5, 0.75 and 1 microg x kg(-1) as necessary; the infusion was kept constant at 0.025 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Maternal pain, satisfaction and sedation scores, remifentanil requirement, and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: Mean pain and patient satisfaction scores, and cumulative doses of remifentanil were similar in the two groups. The overall incidence of side effects was greater in Group B (P = 0.0007), with drowsiness observed in 100% of patients, as compared to 30% in Group A (P = 0.003). The minimum oxygen saturation levels were 94.3% +/- 2.6% and 92.2% +/- 3.8% in Groups A and B respectively (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Although pain and satisfaction scores were similar in both groups, the regimen used in Group A was associated with fewer side effects compared to the Group B dosing regimen. This pilot study suggests that remifentanil intravenous PCA is efficacious for labour analgesia as a bolus of 0.25 microg x kg(-1), with a lockout interval of two minutes and continuous infusion of 0.025-0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). The potential for respiratory depression mandates close respiratory monitoring. Large-scale trials to evaluate safety issues are warranted.     

Epidural tramadol for postoperative pain after Cesarean section

PURPOSE: To compare the post-operative analgesic effect of 100 mg vs 200 mg epidural tramadol and saline in patients undergoing elective Cesarean section. METHODS: Sixty healthy women undergoing Cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 20 in each). Patients received, at skin closure via the epidural catheter, 100 mg tramadol (Group I), 200 mg tramadol (Group II) or 10 ml saline (Control group). Pain scores and side effects were evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hr after surgery. Mean times to the first analgesic administration, as well as the cumulative doses of analgesic requirements over 24 hr postoperatively were compared. RESULTS: The mean time to first analgesic administration was longer in patients who received 100 mg tramadol (4.5 +/- 3.1 hr) and the 200 mg tramadol (6.6 +/- 3.4 hr) than in those who received placebo (2.8 +/- 2 hr). The mean cumulative doses of meperidine over 24 hr were less in the 100 mg tramadol group (0.3 +/- 0.3 mg x kg(-1)) and the 200 mg tramadol group (0.3 +/- 0.3 mg x kg(-1)) than in the control group (0.7 +/- 0.4 mg x kg(-1)). Also, the mean doses of diclofenac over 24 hr were less in the 100 mg tramadol group (156 +/- 59 mg) and the 200 mg tramadol group (142 +/- 62 mg) than in the control group (214 +/- 70 mg). However, no difference was obtained between patients receiving 100 mg and 200 mg tramadol concerning all parameters studied. CONCLUSION: Epidural tramadol 100 mg can provide adequate postoperative analgesia without respiratory depression in patients after Cesarean delivery.     

A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural fentanyl and single dose epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia

In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 23 patients who had undergone Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia were assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of patientcontrolled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with fentanyl compared with a single dose of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. Group A (n = 11) received epidural fentanyl 100 μg intraoperatively, then self-administered a maximum of two epidural fentanyl boluses 50 μg (10 μg · ml^?1) with a lockout period of five minutes for a maximum of two doses per hour. Group B (n = 11) received a single bolus of epidural morphine 3 mg (0.5 mg · ml^?1) intraoperatively and received the same instructions as Group A but had their PCA devices filled with 0.9% NaCl. Patients were assessed up to 24 hr for pain, satisfaction with pain relief, nausea and pruritus using visual analogue scales (VAS). The treatments for inadequate analgesia, nausea and pruritus as well as time to first independent ambulation were recorded. The ventilatory response to carbon dioxide challenge was measured at four and eight hours. Pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and the use of supplemental analgesics were similar in both groups. The mean 24 hr dose of epidural fentanyl used by group A patients was 680 μg. Pruritus was less common in Group A patients at the 8 and 24 hr observation periods (P < 0.0125). Both groups experienced the same degree of nausea and clinically unimportant respiratory depression. We conclude that PCEA with fentanyl provides analgesia equal to a single dose of epidural morphine and may be suitable for patients who have experienced considerable pruritus after epidural morphine adminstration.     

Low-dose sufentanil dœs not potentiate intra-thecal morphine for perioperative analgesia after major colorectal surgery

PURPOSE: Both intrathecal sufentanil (ITS) and intrathecal morphine (ITM) improve analgesia in obstetrical or cardiac procedures. From a pharmacokinetic standpoint, combining these two opioids may improve perioperative analgesia. We performed a prospective randomized double-blind study to compare the analgesic efficacy of ITM alone vs a mixture of a low dose of ITS plus ITM for perioperative pain relief in colorectal surgery. METHODS: Eighty adult patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly allocated to receive either 0.4 mg ITM alone or 10 microg ITS plus 0.4 mg ITM before general anesthesia. Intraoperative intravenous sufentanil consumption, postoperative morphine consumption delivered with a patient controlled analgesia device, pain scores, patient satisfaction and adverse effects were recorded for the first 48 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: No differences were observed between groups with respect to intraoperative sufentanil consumption (39 +/- 23 microg in group ITM and 40 +/- 25 microg in group ITS plus ITM, P = 0.85) and in postoperative morphine consumption in postanesthesia care unit (6 +/- 5 mg vs 6 +/- 5 mg, P = 0.59), at 24 hr (26 +/- 17 vs 24 +/- 15 mg, P = 0.59) and at 48 hr (47 +/- 31 vs 44 +/- 22 mg, P = 0.58). Similarly, no differences were observed in regards to pain relief, patient satisfaction and incidence of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the addition of 10 microg ITS to 0.4 mg ITM for colorectal surgery, as low dose sufentanil does not improve intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in this setting.     

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after thoracotomy: a comparison of morphine with tramadol

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study examined the quality of analgesia together with the side-effects produced by tramadol compared with morphine using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia during the first 24 h after thoracotomy. METHODS: Forty-four patients scheduled for thoracotomy were included in the study. Morphine 0.3 mg kg(-1) was given interpleurally 20 min before a standard general anaesthetic. In the postanaesthetic care unit, the patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups to self-administer tramadol or morphine using a patient-controlled analgesia device throughout a 24 h period. The patient-controlled analgesia device was programmed to deliver tramadol 20 mg as an intravenous bolus or morphine 2 mg with a lockout time of 10 min. RESULTS: Mean cumulative morphine and tramadol consumption were 48.13 +/- 30.23 and 493.5 +/- 191.5 mg, respectively. There was no difference in the quality of analgesia between groups. Five (26.3%) patients in the tramadol group and seven (33%) in the morphine group had nausea, and three of the latter patients vomited. The incidence rate of vomiting with tramadol was 5.2%. All vital signs were within safe ranges. Sedation was less in the tramadol group, but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical setting, which includes interpleural morphine pre-emptively, postoperative analgesia provided by tramadol was similar to that of morphine at rest and during deep inspiration. Side-effects were slight and comparable between the patients receiving morphine and tramadol.