Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggested that ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer might improve the pregnancy rate. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed to compare embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance versus the clinical touch method. A total of 800 embryo transfers was studied; 400 were randomized to ultrasound-guided transfers and 400 were randomized to the clinical touch group. Of these, 441 were fresh cycles and 359 were frozen-thawed cycles. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate was 26.0% in the ultrasound-guided group and 22.5% in the clinical touch group; the difference was not statistically significant. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 23.5% in the ultrasound-guided group compared with 19.0% in the clinical touch group and the difference was again not statistically significant. The implantation rate was slightly higher in the ultrasound-guided group (15.3%) than the clinical touch group (12.0%) (P = 0.048). There were no differences in the incidences of ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A significant improvement in implantation rate was observed following the use of ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer. The extent of improvement in the pregnancy rate may depend on the specific techniques and methods of embryo transfer used in individual centres.     

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy and implantation rates after IVF.

BACKGROUND: Attempts are constantly being made to improve clinical pregnancy rates after IVF and embryo transfer. Since November 1998, we have gradually been adopting transvaginal ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer. We retrospectively examined the efficacy of this method on pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS: The results of 846 cycles from our IVF-embryo transfer programme were analysed and comparisons were made between those carried out using ultrasound guidance and those by the clinical touch method. RESULTS: Higher pregnancy and implantation rates (28.9 and 15.2% respectively) were found in the group using the transvaginal ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer compared with those in the group using the clinical touch method (13.1 and 7.0% respectively). The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in ectopic pregnancy rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer significantly improved both pregnancy and implantation rates. Although technically difficult, we suggest its use may maximize the chances of achieving a successful pregnancy outcome.     

The usefulness of ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that implantation and pregnancy rates were improved with ultrasound-guided embryo transfer compared with clinical touch in fresh IVF cycles associated with supraphysiological ovarian steroid levels. However, the usefulness of ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer where potential hormonal influences are lacking has not been appropriately investigated. METHODS: A total of 184 consecutive patients undergoing thawed embryo transfer cycles with hormone replacement under pituitary suppression were randomized by computer-generated randomization table to two study groups: 93 had ultrasound-guided (group 1) and 91 had clinical touch (group 2) embryo transfer. RESULTS: There was equal distribution between the two study groups with respect to the main demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients as well as the characteristics of both prior IVF cycles from which embryos were generated and cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer cycles. However, both pregnancy and implantation rates in group 1 (34.4 and 19.8% respectively) were significantly higher than the corresponding values (19.7 and 11.9%) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer significantly increases pregnancy and implantation rates.     

Effect of using an echogenic catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in an IVF programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence showed that ultrasound-guided embryo transfer significantly increases successful implantation compared to the clinical touch method. It has been postulated that new echodense catheters which are more readily detectable by ultrasound may refine transfer techniques even more, thus improving IVF outcome. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing IVF outcome for women undergoing embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance by a single healthcare provider with random assignment according to a computer-generated randomization table to either standard soft Wallace catheter (standard catheter group, n=95) or the new echogenic soft Wallace catheter (echogenic catheter group, n=98). RESULTS: The use of the echodense catheter facilitated catheter identification under ultrasound, and thus the duration of the embryo transfer procedure since the loaded catheter was handed to the physician and up to embryo discharge was significantly shorter in the echogenic catheter group as compared with the standard catheter group. There were 39 and 53 clinical pregnancies in the standard catheter (41%) and echogenic catheter (54.1%) groups, respectively. This was not statistically significant (P=0.08) according to the OR (0.6) and CIs (0.33-1.04). However, twin pregnancy rate was significantly increased (P<0.01) with the use of the new catheter which was the underlying source for obtaining significant increase in implantation rate in this group (37.1%) as compared with the standard catheter group (23.2%). CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that the use of the echogenic Wallace catheter simplifies ultrasound-guided embryo transfer but not definite benefit in terms of pregnancy rates was obtained. In contrast, the use of the new catheter was associated with a significant increase in the number of twin pregnancies.     

Embryo transfer: ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch.

In this prospective control study, the pregnancy and implantation rates were compared between ultrasound-guided and clinical touch uterine embryo transfers. In addition, a subset of patients was sought that would particularly benefit from embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance. A total of 187 patients (93 ultrasound and 94 clinical touch) was enrolled. Allocation was random and depended on whether their embryo transfers were done during the 1 h each day in which the ultrasound was available. Pregnancy and implantation rates of 37.8 and 20.4% respectively were achieved when ultrasound was used, compared with 28.9 and 16.2% respectively with clinical touch. This difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the pregnancy rate when the number of embryos transferred was controlled. Older women (>/=37 years old) had an apparently higher pregnancy rate (38.1 versus 20.4%; not significant) with ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer. In the subgroup where the clinician rated the transfer procedure as difficult, there appeared to be a substantial improvement in the pregnancy rate in the group that used ultrasound (54.5 versus 10.0%; not significant). Although our results were not statistically significant, we believe that ultrasound-guided embryo transfers should be used in clinically difficult embryo transfers and in older women, as it appears to improve the pregnancy rate over clinical touch transfers.     

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have suggested that ultrasound (US) guidance during embryo transfer might improve pregnancy rates. METHODS: A prospective randomized (computer-generated random table) trial was performed to compare embryo transfer under abdominal US guidance (n = 255 women) with clinical touch embryo transfer (n = 260). RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate was 26.3% (67/255) in the US-guided transfer group compared with 18.1% (47/260) in the clinical touch transfer group (P < 0.05). The implantation rate was 11.1% (100/903) in the US group compared with 7.5% (66/884) in the clinical touch group (P < 0.05). US-guided transfer was associated with a decrease in the difficulty of the transfers: 97% of transfers were easy in the US-guided group compared with 81% in the clinical touch group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: US-guided embryo transfer increased pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF cycles, as well as the frequency of easy transfers. It is suggested that the decrease in cervical and uterine trauma can play a role in the increase in pregnancy rates associated with US-guided transfer. It is recommended that embryo transfer should be performed under US guidance.     

High serum oestradiol concentrations in fresh IVF cycles do not impair implantation and pregnancy rates in subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

High oestradiol concentrations may be detrimental to the success of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A total of 1122 women aged <40 years who were undergoing their first IVF cycle were evaluated retrospectively. Serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration were categorized into three groups: group A <10 000 pmol/l; group B 10 000-20 000 pmol/l and group C >20 000 pmol/l. In fresh cycles, group A had significantly lower pregnancy rates per transfer (16.2 versus 23.7% respectively, P = 0.005, chi(2)) and implantation rates (8.7 versus 11.7% respectively, P = 0.037, chi(2)), when compared with group B. The pregnancy rate per transfer in group C was significantly lower than that in group B (12.1 versus 23.7%, P = 0.049, chi(2)) and group C had the lowest implantation rate (6.4%). In frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, implantation rates in groups A, B and C were similar (7.5, 8.1 and 9.6% respectively) and the pregnancy rates were also comparable in all groups. In conclusion, high serum oestradiol concentrations in fresh IVF cycles may adversely affect implantation and pregnancy rates. Embryo quality seemed unaffected as excess embryos from different groups had similar implantation and pregnancy rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. The reduced implantation was probably due to an adverse endometrial environment resulting from high serum oestradiol concentrations.     

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5

BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer has been reported to affect success rates in some centres but not others. In a prospective study, we examined the influence of ultrasound guidance in embryo transfer performed on different days after oocyte retrieval. METHODS: Two different methods of embryo transfer were evaluated in 1069 consecutive transfers. The ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was used in 433 cases, whereas 636 embryo transfers were performed with the tactile assessment ('clinical feel') method. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer yielded a higher overall pregnancy rate than the 'clinical feel' approach, 47 versus 36% (P < 0.001). This difference was statistically significant where embryos were transferred after 3 or 4 days of culture, 45.9 versus 37.1% (P = 0.001) and 42.3 versus 27% (P = 0.035) respectively but not significant (P = 0.112) on day 5 embryo transfer (56.3 versus 45.7%). Likewise, the implantation rate was significantly different between the two groups on day 3 and 4 embryo transfer, 23.3 versus 15.8% (P < 0.01) and 21.6 versus 15.7% (P < 0.05%) respectively but no statistical difference was noted on day 5 embryo transfer, 26.7 versus 23.6%. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound assistance in embryo transfer on day 3 and 4 significantly improved pregnancy rates in IVF but had no impact on day 5.     

Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospective controlled study

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to determine whether moulding the embryo transfer catheter according to the uterocervical angle measured by ultrasound could improve pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS: Patients were alternately allocated to one of two groups. In the ultrasound-guided group (n = 320), the catheter was moulded according to the uterocervical angle measured by abdominal ultrasound. In controls (n = 320), embryo transfer was performed using the "clinical feel" method. RESULTS: Moulding the embryo transfer catheter according to the uterocervical angle significantly increased clinical pregnancy [(OR = 1.57, 95% CI (1.08-2.27)] and implantation rates [(OR = 1.47, 95% CI (1.10-1.96)] compared with the "clinical feel" method. It also significantly reduced difficult transfers [(OR = 0.25, 95% CI (0.16-0.40)] and blood during transfers [OR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.50-0.99)]. Patients with large angles (>60 degrees ) had significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with those with no angle [OR = 0.36, 95% CI (0.16-0.52)]. CONCLUSIONS: Moulding the embryo transfer catheter according to the uterocervical angle measured by ultrasound increases clinical pregnancy and implantation rates and diminishes the incidence of difficult and bloody transfers.     

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (ET) is widely suggested as a standard clinical practice that improves overall embryo implantation and pregnancy rates. Various studies of this issue suffer from methodological pitfalls, so that a randomized controlled trial, which overcomes these problems, might be valuable. METHODS: Three hundred women aged <40, who underwent fresh ET, were included in this randomized, double-blind controlled trial. The K-J-SPPE echo tip soft catheter was used for the ultrasound-guided ET and the traditional K-Soft catheter for ETs not using ultrasound. One experienced operator performed all ETs. The primary study outcome was overall pregnancy rate (defined as the number of positive hCG results per transfer). RESULTS: No significant differences between groups were found regarding baseline patient and embryological characteristics, except for male factor and unexplained infertility (higher in the blind and ultrasound-guided ET group, respectively, P < 0.05). Overall pregnancy rates were 53.3 and 51.3% in the ultrasound-guided and blind ET group, respectively. Two ectopic pregnancies were reported in each group. Difficulty in cervical negotiation did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing ET by an experienced operator, ultrasound guidance did not provide any benefit in terms of overall clinical pregnancy and embryo implantation rates.     

Shortened exposure of oocytes to spermatozoa improves in-vitro fertilization outcome: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

A prospective, randomized study of 158 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer was conducted to evaluate whether a shortened exposure of oocytes to spermatozoa enhances oocyte development, and subsequently influences the IVF outcome. A comparison was made between conventional treatment time and shorter exposure of retrieved oocytes to spermatozoa. Fertilization and cleavage rates, embryo quality, implantation and pregnancy rates in the study group (short exposure) versus controls (standard IVF procedure) were evaluated. Fertilization (56 versus 61%) and cleavage rates (96 versus 92%) were similar in the two groups respectively. However, embryo quality was significantly higher in the study group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly increased (42.4 versus 26% per embryo transfer, and 16 versus 10% respectively; P < 0.05). Our results demonstrated that shorter exposure of oocytes to spermatozoa is superior to the standard time in IVF and may have a favourable effect on implantation rates by improving embryo quality.     

The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, embryo transfer after IVF has been performed blindly and placing the embryos approximately 1 cm below the fundal endometrial surface. However, it has been suggested that transferring embryos rather lower in the uterine cavity or high in the uterus may improve implantation rates. Nevertheless, there has not yet been a controlled trial to prove this theory. This prospective randomized study investigates the influence of the depth of embryo replacement on the implantation rate after embryo transfer carried out under transabdominal ultrasound guidance. METHODS: A total of 180 consecutive patients undergoing ultrasound-guided embryo transfer were randomized to three study groups according to the distance between the tip of the catheter and the uterine fundus at the moment of the embryo deposition in the lumen of the endometrial cavity: group 1: 10 +/- 1.5 mm; group 2: 15 +/- 1.5 mm; group 3: 20 +/- 1.5 mm. RESULTS: There was equal distribution between all three study groups regarding the main demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients, ovarian response, oocyte retrieval and IVF outcome, as well as the characteristics of embryo transfer and luteal phase support. The position of the catheter tip in relation to the fundal endometrial surface in groups 1 (10.2 +/- 0.9 mm), 2 (14.6 +/- 0.7 mm) and 3 (19.3 +/- 0.8 mm) was significantly different. Implantation rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in groups 2 (31.3%) and 3 (33.3%) compared with group 1 (20.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The depth of the embryo replacement into the uterine cavity may influence implantation rates, and thus it should be considered as an additional procedure among factors recently proposed as associated with successful embryo transfer after IVF.     

Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Both cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryo transfer policies have advantages and drawbacks. The number of embryos transferred, however, is a crucial parameter that needs to be considered before attempting any comparison. METHODS: An extensive literature search yielded initially 282 studies from which 8 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria: (i) truly randomized design (ii) policy to transfer equal number of embryos in both the cleavage-stage and the blastocyst-stage groups and (iii) published as full text in a peer-review journal. Primary outcome was the live birth rate and secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, cancellation rate and cryopreservation rate. RESULTS: A total of 1654 patients were reviewed. Live birth rate per randomized patient was significantly higher (n = 6 studies) in patients who had a blastocyst-stage transfer as compared to patients with cleavage-stage embryo transfer [odds ratio (OR): 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-1.76; P = 0.005]. Clinical pregnancy rate (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03-1.55; P = 0.02) and cancellation rate per patient randomized (OR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.47-3.32; P = 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with a blastocyst-stage embryo transfer as compared to patients in whom a cleavage-stage embryo transfer was performed. The cryopreservation rate was significantly higher in the cleavage-stage group (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14-0.55; P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The best available evidence suggests that the probability of live birth after fresh IVF is significantly higher after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer as compared to cleavage-stage embryo transfer when equal number of embryos are transferred in the two groups compared.     

A randomized study comparing IVF in the unstimulated cycle with IVF following clomiphene citrate

The efficiency of IVF in unstimulated cycles was compared with that following ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate in a simple protocol with ultrasound monitoring only. A total of 132 couples with no previous IVF attempts, selected by female age <35 years, indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection or infertility caused by tubal factor or unexplained infertility were randomized to the two protocols. Randomization yielded two comparable groups. The clomiphene group (68 couples) performed significantly better than the unstimulated group (64 couples) in terms of number of cycles with oocyte harvest (90/111 or 81% versus 65/114 or 57%; chi(2) = 9.21, P < 0.002), embryo transfers per started cycle (59/111 or 53% versus 29/114 or 25%; chi(2) = 18.14, P < 0.0001), live intrauterine pregnancy rate per started cycle (20/111 or 18% versus 4/114 or 4%; chi(2) = 12.42, P < 0.0001), live intrauterine pregnancy rate per embryo transfer (20/59 or 34% versus 4/29 or 14%; chi(2) = 3.96, P = 0.047), but not in terms of implantation rate (22/85 or 26% versus 4/29 or 14%; chi(2) = 1.65). Only two twin pregnancies occurred. Modest side-effects were recorded following clomiphene. Accordingly, a simple clomiphene citrate protocol, but not IVF in unstimulated cycles, seems compatible with the concept of 'friendly IVF', yielding a fair pregnancy rate both per cycle started and per embryo transfer in selected patients. The results do not substantiate any important negative anti-oestrogenic effects of clomiphene.     

A prospective controlled study of in-vitro fertilization, gamete intra-fallopian transfer and intrauterine insemination combined with superovulation.

The relative effectiveness of in-vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) combined with superovulation in the treatment of infertility were compared in 151 couples undergoing a single cycle of treatment. Treatment was selected as appropriate (IVF for tubal disease, GIFT or IUI/superovulation for nontubal infertility) but possible bias due to non-randomization was overcome by all couples having had favourable fertilization in a previous cycle of IVF. Furthermore, in a preliminary study of initial IVF treatment in 265 couples from whom the study patients were drawn, implantation and pregnancy rates in the diagnostic groups were similar. In the definitive study comparing IVF, GIFT and IUI/superovulation, the pregnancy rate observed with GIFT was highest (40%) but this was not significantly higher than with IVF (28%) or IUI/superovulation (20%). However, the implantation rate per egg transferred by GIFT (21%) was significantly higher than the implantation rate per embryo transferred by IVF (11%). Although the pregnancy rates with GIFT were not statistically greater than with IVF, a significant advantage is likely to be observed in larger groups in view of the better implantation rate. The lower pregnancy rates with IUI superovulation are to be expected because of limited ovarian stimulation, they are nevertheless of comparative interest.     

Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization

Attempts to improve clinical pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer are constantly being made. Two changes in technique of embryo transfer of potential clinical importance were evaluated over two contiguous time periods in order to observe any corresponding change in clinical pregnancy (CP) rate per transfer: (i) embryo transfer catheter; (ii) ultrasound guidance. Catheter choices were hard: Tefcat, Tom Cat, or Norfolk; or soft: Frydman or Wallace. Ultrasound visualization was considered to be excellent/good when the catheter could be followed from the cervix to the fundus by transabdominal ultrasound with retention of the embryo-containing fluid droplet; fair/poor if visualization could not document the sequence of events. Embryo transfers were performed in 518 cycles. CP rates per transfer using soft and hard catheters was 36 and 17% (P < 0.000) respectively. CP rates per transfer for transfers performed with and without ultrasound guidance were 38 and 25% (P < 0.002) respectively. A statistically significant difference was also noted when visualization ranks were compared. CP rates per transfer in all excellent/good ultrasound-guided transfers was 41.5 versus 16.7% for fair/poor transfers (P < 0.038). In conclusion, performance of embryo transfer with a soft catheter under ultrasound guidance with good visualization resulted in a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates.     

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and the accuracy of trial embryo transfer

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (UG-ET) may improve the outcome in IVF; however, several factors may account for the improvement in pregnancy rate. This study examines the use of ultrasound to determine the accuracy of trial transfer (TT) in preparation for ET. METHODS: Sixty-seven consecutive patients prospectively underwent UG-ET over a 2 month period. Total cavity length by US was compared with the length noted by TT. A difference of > or = 1 cm was considered significant. All embryos were placed within 1-2 cm of the fundus by US. RESULTS: Twenty patients (29.9%) had a difference of > or = 1 cm and 13 patients (19.4%) had a difference of < or = 1.5 cm. Patients with a difference of > or = 1 or > or = 1.5 cm had a significantly greater depth at transfer (P < 0.001) and uterine cavity length (P < 0.001) when compared with patients without a difference. Clinical pregnancy, implantation, delivery and overall miscarriage rates did not differ between patients with a difference of > or = 1 or > or = 1.5 cm versus no difference. There were no ectopic pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: Nineteen percent of patients had a discrepancy of > or = 1.5 cm and approximately 30% had a difference of > or = 1 cm from TT at UG-ET, suggesting a benefit to UG-ET. A large prospective randomized trial comparing UG-ET with blind transfer is required to assess further if UG-ET should be used in all cases of ET.     

冻融胚胎移植周期中粒细胞集落刺激因子宫腔灌注对薄型子宫内膜患者的疗效观察

目的观察薄型子宫内膜患者使用粒细胞集落刺激因子宫腔灌注后内膜形态、厚度的变化,分析在冻融胚胎移植周期中薄型子宫内膜患者使用粒细胞集落刺激因子宫腔灌注后胚胎种植率和临床妊娠率的变化。方法回顾性分析2016年12月-2018年12月在我院行冻融胚胎移植的186例薄型子宫内膜患者的临床资料,根据冻融胚胎移植前内膜准备时是否行粒细胞落刺激因子宫腔灌注治疗将患者分为研究组和对照组;内膜准备时在常规治疗基础上,加用粒细胞集落刺激因子宫腔灌注治疗的为研究组,共95例;内膜准备时只用常规治疗的为对照组,共91例。比较移植前子宫内膜准备时两组患者治疗前后子宫内膜形态和厚度的变化,对比胚胎移植后两组患者的胚胎种植率、临床妊娠率、流产率以及异位妊娠率。结果研究组治疗前后内膜形态比较、对照组治疗前后内膜形态比较、治疗后研究组与对照组内膜形态比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组治疗后内膜厚度较治疗前有增加、对照组治疗后内膜厚度较治疗前有增加、治疗后研究组内膜比对照组内膜厚,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);胚胎移植后研究组的胚胎种植率(24.85%)明显高于对照组(14.91%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),研究组临床妊娠率(41.05%)略高于对照组(30.77%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论未见粒细胞集落刺激因子宫腔灌注促使薄型子宫内膜患者内膜的形态和厚度发生有意义的变化;在冻融胚胎移植周期中薄型子宫内膜患者使用粒细胞集落刺激因子宫腔灌注后胚胎种植率高于常规治疗的患者,但临床妊娠率相差不大;提示粒细胞集落刺激因子宫腔灌注可以提高胚胎种植率,但作用机制可能并不是通过改变其子宫内膜形态或是增加其内膜厚度。     

Cervical dilatation has a positive impact on the outcome of IVF in randomly assigned cases having two previous difficult embryo transfers

BACKGROUND: The difficulty of embryo transfer has been reported to affect success rates in some centres, but not in others. Cervical dilatation has been proposed as a means to overcome difficult embryo transfer, but consistent criteria for patient selection are lacking. In a prospective randomized study, we examined the influence of cervical dilatation 1-3 months before embryo transfer on the outcome of IVF in cases having difficult embryo transfer in two previously failed IVF cycles. METHODS: Two alternative methods of embryo transfer preparation were evaluated in 283 randomly assigned women having difficult embryo transfers in two previously failed IVF attempts. Randomization was made using a computer-generated random number table. Cervical dilatation before starting any IVF treatment was used in 145 cases, and no dilatation was performed in 138 cases. RESULTS: The cervical dilatation group yielded a significantly higher pregnancy rate than the non-dilated group (40% versus 24%; P < 0.01). Likewise, the implantation rate (24.1% versus 14.9%; P < 0.01) and the live birth rate (34.48% versus 19.56%; P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the dilatation group than in the non-dilated group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prior difficult embryo transfer, cervical dilatation 1-3 months before embryo transfer lead to an improved pregnancy rate.     

口服避孕药预治疗对多囊卵巢综合征患者体外受精-胚胎移植结果的影响

目的探讨多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者应用口服避孕药预治疗对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)结局的影响。方法 192例PCOS患者IVF-ET周期随机分成两组:研究组IVF-ET前先用口服避孕药(妈富隆或达英35)预治疗93例,对照组99例。比较两组年龄、促性腺激素(Gn)用量、获卵数、受精率、植入率、妊娠率、流产率和卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的发生率。结果两组年龄、Gn用量、获卵数、受精率无明显差异,预治疗组的植入率、妊娠率显著高于对照组(P0.05)。流产率和卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的发生率对照组(9.1%)显著高于研究组(5.2%)。结论 PCOS患者IVF-ET前先用口服避孕药顸治疗可提高植入率和妊娠率,降低OHSS的发生率。