The efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy on biliary tract cancer after R0 resection

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for biliary tract cancer (BTC) after curative-intent resection remains con-troversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for BTC patients undergoing microscopically margin-negative (R0) resection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of BTC patients who underwent curative-intent R0 resection. Patients were eligible if they received either fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy or observation after R0 resection. Results: A total of 153 patients were included. In the entire patient cohort, no significant differences were observed in 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (48.4% vs. 39.6%,P= 0.439) or 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates (49.1% vs. 39.5%,P= 0.299) between patients who received fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. However, for patients with stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ BTC, chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year OS rate (52.4% vs. 35.6%, P= 0.002) and 3-year RFS rate (55.5% vs. 39.1%,P= 0.021) compared with observation. Conclusion: Fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy may prolong the survival of patients with stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ BTC after R0 resection.     

Recurrence‐free and overall survival among elderly stage III colon cancer patients treated with CAPOX or capecitabine monotherapy

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of CAPOX and capecitabine on recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among elderly stage III colon cancer patients and to evaluate the effect of (non‐)completion. Patients aged ≥70 years who underwent resection only or who were subsequently treated with CAPOX or capecitabine in 10 large non‐academic hospitals were included. RFS and OS were analyzed with Kaplan‐Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics. 982 patients were included: 630 underwent surgery only, 191 received CAPOX and 161 received capecitabine. Five‐year RFS and OS did not differ between capecitabine and CAPOX (RFS: 63% vs. 60% (p = 0.91), adjusted HR = 0.99 (95%CI 0.68‐1.44); OS: 66% vs. 66% (p = 0.76), adjusted HR = 0.93 (95%CI 0.64–1.34)). After resection only, RFS was 38% and OS 37%. Completion rates were 48% for CAPOX and 68% for capecitabine. Three‐year RFS and OS did not differ between patients who discontinued CAPOX early and patients who completed treatment with CAPOX (RFS: 61% vs. 69% (p = 0.21), adjusted HR = 1.42 (95%CI 0.85–2.37); OS: 68% vs. 78% (p = 0.41), adjusted HR = 1.17 (95%CI 0.70–1.97)). Three‐year RFS and OS differed between patients who discontinued capecitabine early and patients who completed treatment with capecitabine (RFS: 54% vs. 72% (p = 0.01), adjusted HR = 2.07 (95%CI 1.11–3.84); OS: 65% vs. 80% (p = 0.01), adjusted HR = 2.00 (95%CI 1.12–3.59)). Receipt of CAPOX or capecitabine is associated with improved RFS and OS. The advantage does not differ by regimen. The addition of oxaliplatin might not be justified in elderly stage III colon cancer patients.     

The Influence of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Dose Intensity on Five-Year Outcomes in Resected Colon Cancer: A Single Centre Retrospective Analysis

There is evidence that achieving a dose intensity > 80% in adjuvant colon cancer treatment improves survival. In total, 192 consecutive patients with resected stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer that received adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received at least 6 weeks of adjuvant therapy were included. The primary objective was to assess the influence of dose index (DI) and relative dose intensity (RDI) on DFS and OS at 3 and 5 years in patients receiving fluorouracil-based doublet therapy with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (5-FU and oxaliplatin assessed separately), or capecitabine monotherapy. In the capecitabine group, DFS rates for 3 and 5 years were 66.7% and 57.6%, respectively, while OS rates were 80.3% and 66.7%, respectively. Those who received FOLFOX had DFS rates of 76.9% and 71.2% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. OS rates were 86.4% and 76.7% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Median RDI was 73.8% for capecitabine and 76.3% and 85.6% for the oxaliplatin and 5-FU components respectively. Based on a multivariate analysis in patients receiving FOLFOX, those with an oxaliplatin DI > 80% had improvements in DFS and OS compared to those with an oxaliplatin DI of ≤80%. Otherwise, there was no significant difference in DFS or OS when comparing patients who achieved an RDI or a DI of above versus below 80% in the patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer.     

Chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials

Owing to the lack of randomised controlled trials no standard of chemotherapy exists in the treatment of advanced biliary tract carcinoma. 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine is recommended based on small and predominately phase II trials. The aim of this analysis was to analyse existing trials, even small and nonrandomised, and identify superior regimens. Chemotherapy trials published in English from 1985 to July 2006 were analysed as well as ASCO abstracts from 1999 to 2006. Response rate (RR=CR+PR), tumour control rate (TCR=CR+PR+SD), time to tumour progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analysed. One hundred and four trials comprising 112 trial arms and 2810 patients, thereof 634 responders and 1368 patients with tumour control were analysed. Pooled RR and TCR were 22.6 and 57.3%, respectively. Significant correlations of RR and TCR with survival times were found. Subgroup analysis showed superior RRs for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) compared with cholangiocarcinoma, but shorter OS for GBC. Furthermore, superior RRs and TCRs of gemcitabine and platinum containing regimens were found with highest RRs and TCRs in the combination subgroup. Based on published results of predominately phase II trials, gemcitabine combined with platinum compounds represents the provisional standard of chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer, unless a new evidence-based standard has been defined.     

Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer

BackgroundThere is no clear consensus regarding systemic treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer (OC). Clinical trials are challenging because of the relatively low incidence and good prognosis. Initial results of the International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm (ICON)1 trial demonstrated benefit in both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with adjuvant chemotherapy. We report results of 10-year follow-up to establish whether benefits are maintained longer term and discuss how this and other available evidence from randomised trials can be used to guide treatment options regarding the need for, and choice of, adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.Patients and methodsICON1 recruited women with OC following primary surgery in whom there was uncertainty as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated. Patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant or no adjuvant chemotherapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy was recommended and 87% received single-agent carboplatin. Analyses of long-term treatment benefits and interaction with risk groups were carried out. A high-risk group of women was defined with stage 1B/1C grade 2/3, any stage 1 grade 3 or clear-cell histology.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 10 years, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for RFS was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.94, P = 0.02] and OS 0.71 (95% CI 0.52–0.98, P = 0.04) in favour of chemotherapy. In absolute terms, there was a 10% (60%–70%) improvement in RFS and a 9% (64%–73%) improvement in OS; the benefit of chemotherapy might be greater in high-risk disease (18% improvement in OS). Uncertainty remains about the optimal chemotherapy regimen. The only randomised trial data available are from a subset of 120 stage 1 patients in ICON3 where the treatment difference, comparing carboplatin with carboplatin/paclitaxel was estimated with relatively wide CIs [progression-free survival HR = 0.71 (95% CI 0.39–1.32) and OS HR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.49–1.93)].ConclusionsExtended follow-up from ICON1 confirms that adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to women with early-stage OC, particularly those with high-risk disease.Clinical trial numbersISRCTN11916376 for ICON1 and ISRCTN57157825 for ICON3.     

Two years of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal patients with breast cancer: a randomised, controlled trial with long-term follow-up

Adjuvant tamoxifen treatment increases recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in early breast cancer, although in premenopausal patients the number of studies comparing tamoxifen vs no treatment are limited. We report herein the effect on RFS of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in a multicentre trial of premenopausal patients with stage II breast cancer patients randomised between 1986 and 1991 to 2 years of tamoxifen treatment (n=276) or no treatment (n=288). The receptor status of the tumour was known for 541 (96%) of the patients included. Tamoxifen treatment significantly increased RFS in patients with hormone receptor-positive (oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and/or progesterone receptor-positive (PR+)) tumours (Relative Risk (RR) 0.65; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.48-0.89, P=0.006), and the beneficial effect of tamoxifen was extended to patients with indicators of poor prognosis, such as young age and nodal-positivity. PR status was a significant predictor of response to tamoxifen in multivariate models with testing of interactions of hormone receptor status and adjuvant therapy.     

The role of Cathepsin S as a marker of prognosis and predictor of chemotherapy benefit in adjuvant CRC: a pilot study

Background:

The aim of this pilot retrospective study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of Cathepsin S (CatS) in three cohorts of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n=560).

Methods:

Prevalence and association with histopathological variables were assessed across all cohorts. Association with clinical outcomes was investigated in the Northern Ireland Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial cohort (n=211), where stage II/III CRC patients were randomised between surgery-alone or surgery with adjuvant fluorouracil/folinic acid (FU/FA) treatment.

Results:

Greater than 95% of tumours had detectable CatS expression with significantly increased staining in tumours compared with matched normal colon (P>0.001). Increasing CatS was associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS; P=0.03) among patients treated with surgery alone. Adjuvant FU/FA significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12–0.89) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08–0.81) among 36 patients with high CatS. Treatment did not benefit the 66 patients with low CatS, with a RFS HR of 1.34 (95% CI, 0.60–3.19) and OS HR of 1.33 (95% CI, 0.56–3.15). Interaction between CatS and treatment status was significant for RFS (P=0.02) and OS (P=0.04) in a multivariate model adjusted for known prognostic markers.

Conclusion:

These results signify that CatS may be an important prognostic biomarker and predictive of response to adjuvant FU/FA in CRC.     

Mitomycin C in combination with capecitabine or biweekly high-dose gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a randomised phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma face a particularly dismal prognosis, and no standard palliative chemotherapy has yet been defined. Among several different single agents, mitomycin C and, more recently, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine and the nucleoside analogue gemcitabine, have been reported to exert antitumour activity. In view of a potential drug synergy, the present randomised phase II trial was initiated. The aim was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerance of mitomycin C (MMC) in combination with gemcitabine (GEM) or capecitabine (CAPE) in previously untreated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients were entered in this study and randomly allocated to treatment with MMC 8 mg/m2 on day 1 in combination with GEM 2000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks, or MMC 8 mg/m2 on day 1 plus CAPE 2000 mg/m2/day on days 1-14, every 4 weeks. In both arms, chemotherapy was administered for a total of 6 months unless progressive disease occurred earlier. RESULTS: Pretreatment characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. The overall independent review committee-confirmed response rate among those treated with MMC + GEM was 20% (five of 25) compared with 31% (eight of 26) among those treated with MMC + CAPE. Similarly, median progression-free survival (PFS; 4.2 versus 5.3 months) and median overall survival (OS; 6.7 versus 9.25 months) tended to be superior in the latter combination arm. Chemotherapy was fairly well tolerated in both arms, with a comparably low rate of only grade 1 and 2 non-haematological adverse reactions. Also, only four (17%) patients in both treatment arms experienced grade 3 leukocytopenia, and three (13%) and four (17%) had grade 3 thrombocytopenia in the MMC + GEM and MMC + CAPE arm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that both combination regimens are feasible, tolerable and clinically active. The MMC + CAPE arm, however, seems to be superior in terms of response rate, PFS and OS, and should therefore be selected for further clinical investigation in advanced biliary tract cancer.     

Chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) duplication as a predictor of anthracycline response: evidence from the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) MA.5 Trial

HER2 gene amplification and topoisomerase IIα gene (TOP2A) alteration have been associated with increased benefit from anthracycline compared to non-anthracycline containing adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy in some but not other studies. Chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) duplication was measured on TMAs from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens obtained from 639 of 716 premenopausal women with node positive breast cancer who received cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil (CEF) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) in the randomized controlled mammary 5 (MA.5) adjuvant trial. The prognostic impact of CEP17 duplication and its interactions with treatment were studied for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Overall, CEP17 duplication was not significantly associated with RFS or OS in multivariate analysis. For patients whose tumours had normal CEP17 copy number there were no apparent benefits for CEF compared to CMF for RFS (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.68–1.42) or OS (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.72–1.69). For patients whose tumours had CEP17 duplication, there was significant benefit for CEF compared to CMF for RFS (HR 0.54; CI 0.33–0.89) and a trend towards significance for OS (HR 0.64; CI 0.37–1.09). The adjusted P values for interaction between treatment and CEP17 duplication were 0.09 for RFS and 0.13 for OS. This study suggests that CEP17 duplication has a borderline association with clinical responsiveness to anthracycline containing chemotherapy similar to previous results seen with HER2 amplification and TOP2A alteration in MA.5. An appropriately powered meta-analysis is required to discriminate the predictive value of these three candidate markers.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Single-centre experience and literature review

Background In recent years platinum-based chemotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with good performance status after complete resection in stages IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although the benefit is mainly in stages II and IIIA. Patients and methods In a retrospective trial we evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of a platinum- and taxanes-based adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected IB-IIIA NSCLC. The primary end point was relapse- free survival (RFS); principal secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and safety of the regimen. Potential predictive factors of efficacy and clinical patterns of relapse were also analysed. Results From January 2003 to December 2006, 41 patients met the inclusion criteria and were evaluable. Median age at diagnosis was 68.1 years (CI 95% 54-72; range 45-78). Most patients were males (87.7%) and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (PS) of 0-1 (87.8%), and 53.6% had adenocarcinomas. Pathological stages were as follow: 48.7% stage IB, 24.3% stage II and 26.8% stage IIIA. 75.6% of patients underwent a lobectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy and were treated with a combination of carboplatin AUC6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) (85.36%) for 3 or 4 cycles. With a median follow-up of 18.2 months (range 5.1-46.5), 26 patients (63%) were free of disease and 32 of them were alive (78%). Median RFS was 12.1 months (CI 95% 9.8-14.9) and median OS had not been reached at the time of analysis. Patients with PS相似文献   

Doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma: pooled analysis of two STBSG-EORTC phase III clinical trials

BackgroundThe EORTC-STBSG coordinated two large trials of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Both studies failed to demonstrate any benefit on overall survival (OS). The aim of the analysis of these two trials was to identify subgroups of patients who may benefit from adjuvant CT.Patients and methodsIndividual patient data from two EORTC trials comparing doxorubicin-based CT to observation only in completely resected STS (large resection, R0/marginal resection, R1) were pooled. Prognostic factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Patient outcomes were subsequently compared between the two groups of patients according to each analyzed factor.ResultsA total of 819 patients had been enrolled with a median follow-up of 8.2 years. Tumor size, high histological grade and R1 resection emerged as independent adverse prognostic factors for relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS. Adjuvant CT is an independent favorable prognostic factor for RFS but not for OS. A significant interaction between benefit of adjuvant CT and age, gender and R1 resection was observed for RFS and OS. Males and patients >40 years had a significantly better RFS in the treatment arms, while adjuvant CT was associated with a marginally worse OS in females and patients <40years. Patients with R1 resection had a significantly better RFS and OS favoring adjuvant CT arms.ConclusionAdjuvant CT is not associated with a better OS in young patients or in any pathology subgroup. Poor quality of initial surgery is the most important prognostic and predictive factor for utility of adjuvant CT in STS. Based on these data, we conclude that adjuvant CT for STS remains an investigational procedure and is not a routine standard of care.     

Future treatment options with capecitabine in solid tumours

The oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine is attracting great interest in the context of tumour-selective therapy and rationally designed combination regimens. Agents such as taxanes upregulate thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and there is therefore a clear rationale for their combination with capecitabine. Preclinical studies of capecitabine/taxane combination therapy demonstrated synergistic antitumour activity and phase I studies showed encouraging efficacy. Therefore, a randomised, phase III trial (docetaxel versus docetaxel/capecitabine) has been initiated in anthracycline-refractory metastatic breast cancer patients. Recruitment is complete. In colorectal cancer, capecitabine/oxaliplatin combination therapy is promising and a phase I, dose-finding trial has been conducted in patients with refractory metastatic solid tumours. A similar trial has evaluated capecitabine/irinotecan combination treatment. Capecitabine is also being investigated as adjuvant therapy for colorectal and breast cancers. The primary objective of the ongoing X-ACT trial in almost 2000 Dukes' C colon cancer patients is to demonstrate at least equivalent disease-free survival between capecitabine and the Mayo Clinic regimen. In addition, the CALGB is planning a randomised, phase III trial of capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant treatment in high-risk, node-negative breast cancer patients aged >65 years.     

Epirubicin versus CMF as adjuvant therapy for stage I and II breast cancer: a prospective randomised study

We compared a relatively short regimen of monochemotherapy with epirubicin versus polychemotherapy with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant treatment for stage I and II breast cancer patients. 348 patients with oestrogen receptor negative (ER-) node negative and ER- or ER+ node-positive with <10 nodes were accrued. CMF was given intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, every 4 weeks, for six courses; epirubicin was given weekly for 4 months. Postmenopausal patients received tamoxifen for 3 years. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and event-free survival (EFS). Outcome evaluation was performed both in eligible patients and in all randomised patients according to the intention-to-treat principle. 8 randomised patients were considered ineligible. At a median follow-up of 8 years, there was no difference in OS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.11, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.77-1.61, P=0.58), EFS (HR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.64, P=0.48), and RFS (HR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.8-1.64, P=0.48) between the two arms for all of the patients. At 8 years, the RFS percentages (+/-Standard Error (S.E.)) were 65.4% (+/-4%) in the CMF arm and 62.7% (+/-4%) in the epirubicin arm; for EFS these were 64.2% (+/-4%) for CMF and 60.8% (+/-4%) for epirubicin, respectively. A significant difference in RFS (P=0.015) was observed in patients with 4-9 positive nodes in favour of the CMF arm. Toxicity in the two arms was superimposable except for more frequent grade 3 alopecia in the epirubicin-treated patients (P=0.001). Overall, at a median follow-up of 8 years, there were no differences between the two arms in terms of OS, EFS and RFS.     

Good clinical response of breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy is associated with improved overall survival.

BACKGROUND: We present extended follow-up from a prospective randomised trial evaluating the role of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 309 women were randomised to primary surgery followed by eight cycles of adjuvant mitoxantrone, methotrexate with tamoxifen (2MT) or 2MT with mitomycin-C (3MT) versus the same regimen for four cycles before followed by four cycles after surgery. For this analysis the median follow-up of patients was 112 months. RESULTS: After 10 years follow-up there is still no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) (71% versus 71%) or overall survival (OS) (63% versus 70%) when comparing adjuvant versus neoadjuvant treatment, respectively. Of 144 evaluable patients in the neoadjuvant arm, 74 achieved a good clinical response and 70 patients achieved a poor clinical response. Good responders had a superior DFS (80% versus 64%, P=0.01) and OS (77% versus 63%, P=0.03) compared to poor responders. CONCLUSIONS: At 10 years, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment continue to have equivalent OS and DFS. Good clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with superior DFS and OS. This supports the use of clinical response of primary breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy as a surrogate marker of survival benefit.     

Real-world Data for High-risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer – The Role of Tumor Side in the Adjuvant Setting

BackgroundThe impact of sidedness in the high-risk stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) setting is uncertain. Although controversial, available data suggest a possible modest benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in the adjuvant scenario. The aim of this study is to analyze the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to the tumor side.Patients and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective cohort, we analyzed patients treated between January 2011 and December 2018. We evaluated OS and RFS of high-risk patients according to the tumor side and considering adjuvant CT exposure and clinical and molecular features.ResultsA total of 1047 patients with stage II CRC were evaluated. Of these, 540 had high-risk criteria and microsatellite stability (MSS) or unknown status. One hundred fifty-seven (29%) patients had right-sided tumors, and 352 (65.2%) had left-sided tumors. Most patients received adjuvant CT, and the majority of them had T3 stage tumors, ≥ 12 lymph node resection, left tumor, MSS, and moderate differentiation. OS did not differ according to tumor side (5-year OS rates: 81.9% for right-sided tumors vs. 83% for left-sided tumors; hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.53; P = .744). Adjuvant CT was associated with a superior RFS and OS, with 5-year OS rates of 87.7% versus 76.1% in the no-adjuvant group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.73; P = .001).ConclusionThe tumor side did not influence the outcomes in this study. Adjuvant CT was associated with improved RFS and OS in patients with high-risk stage II CRC, with a total gain of 11.6% in 5-year OS.     

Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles on Prognosis of Resectable Stomach Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles on the prognosisof patients with post-operative stomach cancer through retrospective analysis. Methods: A total of 128 patientswith gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin,cisplatin or oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil, according to a defined schedule, were divided into threegroups according to the number of chemotherapy cycles: Group I (<6 cycles); Group II (6 cycles); and GroupIII (>6 cycles). Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 20.8% in Group I, 45.0% in Group II, and 42.9%in Group III, with a median follow-up of 43 months. The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 15.1% in GroupI, 40% in Group II, and 40% in Group III. The OS and RFS in Groups II and III were significantly betterthan in Group I (OS, p = 0.002 and p=0.003; RFS, P<0.001 and P=0.002). There was no difference in OS (p =0.970) or in RFS (p = 0.722) between Groups II and III. Multivariate Cox hazard analysis determined that thenumber of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles was an independent factor that influenced OS and RFS. Conclusion:Six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy gave encouraging outcomes in patients with resectable gastric cancer.Further prospective randomized controlled investigations are warranted in a multi-center setting.     

Gemcitabine–cisplatin (GC) as adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage II and stage III gallbladder cancers (GBC): a potential way forward

Data on adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine–cisplatin (GC) in resected gallbladder cancers (GBC) are scarce. Patients who underwent upfront curative resection for GBC from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed. Patients with stage II–III GBC treated with adjuvant GC were analyzed. A total of 242 patients were evaluated, of whom 125 patients received GC regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy. The median age was 50 years (range 31–74), majority were female (77.6%), and 37 patients (29.6%) had raised CA 19.9 levels at baseline. One hundred and thirteen patients (90.4%) underwent radical cholecystectomy with R0 resections. Median number of GC administered was 6, with completion rates of 84%. Toxicity data were comprehensively available for 110 patients, with common grade 3 and grade 4 being neutropenia (9.9%), fatigue (7.3%) and febrile neutropenia (3.6%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 36.88 months, 3-year RFS was 60.3%. Patients with stage II (28%; n?=?35), stage IIIA (28%; n?=?35) and stage IIIB GBC (44%; n?=?55) had a 3-year OS of 91.9, 67 and 58.1% (p?=?0.001), respectively. Patients with stage II–III GBC undergoing R0 resections receiving adjuvant GC have good tolerance, high completion rates and encouraging outcomes in a non-trial high GBC prevalence scenario.     

Adjuvant cytotoxic and endocrine therapy in pre- and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer and one to nine infiltrated nodes: five-year results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized HE 10/92 study

SUMMARY: The present randomized phase III trial was designed to detect a 15% benefit in relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) from the incorporation of adjuvant tamoxifen to the combination of CNF [cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2; mitoxantrone (Novantrone), 10 mg/m2; fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2 chemotherapy and ovarian ablation in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer and conversely from the incorporation of CNF chemotherapy to adjuvant tamoxifen in node-positive postmenopausal patients. From April 1992 until March 1998, 456 patients with operable breast cancer and one to nine infiltrated axillary nodes entered the study. Premenopausal patients were treated with six cycles of CNF chemotherapy followed by ovarian ablation with monthly injections of triptoreline 3.75 mg for 1 year (Group A, 84 patients) or the same treatment followed by 5 years of tamoxifen (Group B, 92 patients). Postmenopausal patients received 5 years of tamoxifen (Group C, 145 patients) or 6 cycles of CNF followed by 5 years of tamoxifen (Group D, 135 patients). Adjuvant radiation was administered to all patients with partial mastectomy. After a median follow-up period of 5 years, 125 patients (27%) relapsed and 79 (17%) died. The 5-year actuarial RFS for premenopausal patients was 65% in Group A and 68% in Group B (p = 0.86) and for postmenopausal patients 70% in Group C and 67% in Group D (p = 0.36). Also, the respective OS rates were 77% and 80% (p = 0.68) for premenopausal and 84% and 78% (p = 0.10) for postmenopausal patients. Severe toxicities were infrequently seen, with the exception of leukopenia (18%), among the 311 patients treated with CNF. In conclusion, the present study failed to demonstrate a 15% difference in RFS in favor of node-positive premenopausal patients treated with an additional 5 years of tamoxifen after CNF adjuvant chemotherapy and ovarian ablation. Similarly, six cycles of CNF preceding 5 years of tamoxifen did not translate to a 15% RFS benefit in node-positive postmenopausal patients.     

Investigation of MRP-1 protein and MDR-1 P-glycoprotein expression in invasive breast cancer: a prognostic study

The efficacy of breast cancer treatment is limited by the development of resistance to various chemotherapeutic agents. We conducted a retrospective study of the expression of 2 drug resistance efflux pumps, MRP-1 and MDR-1 Pgp, in 177 invasive breast carcinomas. Immunohistochemical expression of these proteins was correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics as well as relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) times. MDR-1 Pgp was associated strongly with higher histologic grade (grade III). A highly significant association was shown between MDR-1 Pgp and MRP-1 expression (p < 0.01), 47.4% of patients expressing both proteins; MRP-1 was expressed in approximately 61% of patients and MDR-1, in approximately 66% of patients. No association was shown in the overall group between either MDR-1 Pgp or MRP-1 and any of the other clinicopathologic features. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that in a subset of patients with either high-grade (grade III) stage 1 (node-negative) or stage 2 (node-positive) tumours who were treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, MRP-1 expression in <25% of tumour cells at diagnosis was significantly associated with improved RFS (p < 0.02) and OS (p < 0.02). Using multivariate analysis, MRP-1 expression in <25% of tumour cells at diagnosis was identified as an independent, significant prognostic factor for RFS (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.01) in this patient group but not in other groups. In this subgroup, no significant correlation was observed between expression of MDR-1 Pgp and MRP-1. While the number of patients with high-grade tumours treated with adjuvant chemotherapy was small and further confirmatory research is warranted, it appears that assessment of MRP-1 expression at diagnosis may offer useful prognostic information in subgroups of patients with stage 1 or stage 2 high-grade tumours who receive CMF-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Given the known substrate specificities of MRP-1, any mechanistic relationship between MRP-1 expression and CMF resistance remains unclear. No association was shown between MDR-1 Pgp expression and either RFS or OS time in any subgroup of patients.     

Class III beta-tubulin expression and benefit from adjuvant cisplatin/vinorelbine chemotherapy in operable non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of NCIC JBR.10.

PURPOSE: High class III beta-tubulin (bTubIII) expression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer is known to correlate with reduced response rates and inferior survival with anti-microtubule agents. JBR.10 showed a 12% and 15% improvement in 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively, with the addition of cisplatin and vinorelbine following resection of stage IB-II non-small cell lung cancer. We sought to determine the effect of bTubIII on patient outcome and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the JBR.10 trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We did a semiquantitative immunohistochemical assay for bTubIII on primary tumor tissue available from 265 of the 482 patients in JBR.10. Tumors were classified as bTubIII "low" or "high" using a validated method. We examined the prognostic effect of bTubIII in patients treated with or without chemotherapy and the survival benefit from chemotherapy in low versus high bTubIII subgroups. RESULTS: High bTubIII expression was associated with poorer RFS and OS in patients treated with surgery alone but not in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The RFS and OS benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy were greater in high versus low tubulin expressors. However, with Cox regression, the interaction between bTubIII status and chemotherapy treatment in predicting RFS or OS did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy seemed to overcome the negative prognostic effect of high bTubIII expression. Greater benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was seen in patients with high bTubIII expression. This is contrary to what has been seen in the setting of advanced disease; possible reasons for this difference are being explored.