Haemorrhagic soft-tissue sarcoma: Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors for survival

IntroductionHaemorrhagic soft-tissue sarcomas (HSTS) are characterised by aggressive local growth and highly metastatic behaviour. We aimed to describe oncological outcomes and prognostic factors.Materials and methodsRetrospective review including 64 patients treated with palliation (n = 7), with limb salvage surgery (LSS) (n = 9), with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) + LSS (n = 12), with LSS + adjuvant RT (n = 30) or amputation (n = 6). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). After uni- and multivariate analysis, prognostic factors affecting OS, MFS and LRFS were identified.ResultsMedian age was 67 years (IQR 23 years) with median follow-up of 11 months (IQR 28 months). All cases were high grade. Eight (13%) had pulmonary metastases at presentation and another 40 (63%) developed metastases after median 9 months (IQR 19 months). Median OS was 12 months (IQR 38 months), and estimated OS after two-years was 15.9% and 52.9% for patients with and without metastatic disease at presentation, respectively. Improved OS was associated with negative resection margins (p = 0.031), RT (p = 0.045), neoadjuvant RT (versus adjuvant RT, p = 0.044) and amputation (versus LSS, p < 0.001). MFS was 35.1% after two-years. LR occurred in 18 of 51 (35.3%) patients with surgically treated localised disease. LRFS was 63.4% after two-years and significantly affected by a negative margin (p = 0.042) and RT (p = 0.001).ConclusionHaemorrhagic soft-tissue sarcomas should be excised, either with amputation or LSS with a clear resection margin. If LSS is attempted, neoadjuvant RT reduces the risk of tumour spillage and early LR, enhances the feasibility of achieving clear resection margins, and offers superior overall survival compared to adjuvant RT.     

Oncologic outcomes of surgically managed primary pelvic soft tissue sarcoma; tumour biology or surgical constraints of the true pelvis?

BackgroundPelvic soft tissue sarcomas are rare. Potentially curative resection remains challenging due to anatomical constraints of true pelvis and tumour spread through various anatomical hiatus. We sought to review the oncological outcomes of surgically managed cases at our centre and determine whether outcomes differ for patients with localised (limited to pelvis) versus extensive disease (with extra-pelvic extension).MethodsSixty-seven patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent at the centre for primary, non-metastatic, WHO intermediate to high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the true pelvis from January 2012 through January 2020 were analysed. Establishment of the extent of disease was made by review of pre-treatment imaging and surgical notes. Oncologic endpoints examined were resection margin, recurrence rate, disease-free and overall survival.ResultsRates of complete oncological resection and disease control were similar for tumours with localised or extensive disease. On logistic regression analysis, tumour grade, and a negative resection margin (R0) correlated with the risk of recurrence (p=<0.05). On further multinomial analysis, R0 resection was associated with improved local control, but not metastatic relapse (p = 0.003).5-year local recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival were 61.3% and 67.1%, respectively. Five and 10-year overall survival were 64% and 36%, respectively. Age >50 years and high tumour grade were associated with a worse outcome (p < 0.05).ConclusionsWhen potentially curative surgery is performed for pelvic sarcoma, disease-extent does not influence oncologic outcomes. While a complete oncologic resection determines the risk of local recurrence, tumour grade and metastatic relapse remain primary prognostic determinants for overall survival.     

Abdominal lymph node recurrence from colorectal cancer: Resection should be considered as a curative treatment in patients with controlled disease

BackgroundLymph node recurrences (LNR) from colorectal cancer (CRC) still represent a therapeutic challenge, as standardized recommendations have yet to be established. The aim of this study was to analyze short- and long-term oncological outcomes following resection of LNR from CRC.MethodsAll patients with previously resected CRC who underwent histopathologically confirmed LNR resection in 3 tertiary referral centers between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed, mainly recurrence-free and overall survival. Further recurrences following LNR resection were also analyzed.ResultsOverall, 18 patients were included. Primary CRC was left-sided in 16 (89%) patients, staged T3-4 in 15 (83%), N+ in 14 (78%) and presented with synchronous metastases in 8 (43%). Median time interval between primary CRC and LNR resections was 31 months. Performed lymphadenectomies were aortocaval (n = 10), pelvic (n = 7), in hepatic pedicle (n = 3) and mesenteric (n = 1). Four patients had associated liver metastases resection. Three (17%) presented with postoperative complications, of which one Clavien-Dindo 3. Fourteen (78%) patients presented with further recurrences after a mean delay of 9 months, with 36% of patients presenting with early (<6 months) recurrence. Five (36%) patients could undergo secondary recurrence resection and 3 (21%) patients radiotherapy. Median overall survival following LNR resection reached 44 months.ConclusionsCurrent results suggest that LNR resection is feasible and associated with improved survival, in selected patients. Longer time interval between primary CRC resection and LNR occurrence appeared to be a favorable prognostic factor whereas multisite recurrence appeared to be associated with impaired long-term survival.     

Systemic metastases from low-grade and high-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei: Treatments and outcomes

BackgroundThe metastasizing potential of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is largely unknown. We assessed incidence, impact on prognosis, treatments, and outcomes of systemic metastases after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC).MethodsA prospective database of 327 patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PMP of appendiceal origin was reviewed. PMP was graded according to the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) classification. Haematogenous metastases, and non-regional lymph-node involvement were considered as systemic metastases.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 74.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68.0–94.8), systemic metastases occurred in 21 patients. Eleven patients were affected by low-grade PMP, and ten by high-grade PMP. Metastatic disease involved the lung (n = 12), bone (n = 1), liver (n = 4), distant nodes (n = 3), both lung and distant nodes (n = 1). Systemic metastases independently correlated with PSOGI histological subtypes (P = 0.001), and incomplete cytoreduction (P = 0.026). Median OS was 139.0 months (95%CI = 56.6–161.9) for patients who experienced systemic metastases, and 213.8 months (95%CI = 148.7-not reached) for those who did not (P = 0.159). Eight of eleven patients who had curative-intent surgery are presently alive at a median of 52.5 months (range 2.0–112.7). Seven are disease-free at a median of 27.4 months (range 2.0–110.4). At multivariate analysis, PSOGI histological subtypes (P = 0.001), completeness of cytoreduction (P = 0.001), and preoperative systemic chemotherapy (P = 0.020) correlated with poorer survival. Systemic metastases did not (P = 0.861).ConclusionsAfter CRS/HIPEC, systemic metastases occur in a small but clinically relevant number of patients, and the risk increases with incomplete cytoreduction and aggressive histology. In selected patients, surgical resection of metastatic disease can result in long survival.     

Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node status in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm – Time to consider a reclassification?

BackgroundPara-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) correlates with poor prognosis. The role of PALN in invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (inv-IPMN) has not been well explored. The present study investigated the rate of metastatic PALN, lymph node ratio (LNR) and the overall nodal (N) status as prognostic factors in PDAC and inv-IPMN.MethodsThis consecutive single-center series included patients with PDAC or inv-IPMN in the pancreatic head who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy, including PALN resection between 2009 and 2018. Median overall survival (mOS) and impact of clinicopathological factors, including PALN status on survival, were evaluated.Results403 patients were included, 314 had PDAC and 89 inv-IPMN. PALN were metastatic in 16% of PDAC and 17% of inv-IPMN. N0 status was present in 6% of the patients with PDAC and 16% of inv-IPMN patients (p = 0.007). LNR >15% was more common in PDAC (52%) than in inv-IPMN (34%) (p = 0.004). mOS was 12.7 months in the presence of PALN metastases and 22.7 months without (p < 0.0001). Age >70 years, CA19-9 >200 U/mL, PDAC and N2 status were significantly associated with worse survival in a multivariable analysis. PALN status and LNR were not independent prognostic factors. In N2 status mOS was similar regardless the presence of PALN metastases.ConclusionThe frequency of PALN metastases was similar in PDAC and inv-IPMN. Although PALN positive status entailed a shorter mOS, it was not an independent risk factor for death, and did not influence survival in N2-staged disease. The M1-status for PALN positivity may need reconsideration.     

A closer look at the natural history and recurrence patterns of high-grade truncal/extremity leiomyosarcomas: A multi-institutional analysis from the US Sarcoma Collaborative

Background/objectiveNatural history and outcomes for truncal/extremity (TE) soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is derived primarily from studies investigating all histiotypes as one homogenous cohort. We aimed to define the recurrence rate (RR), recurrence patterns, and response to radiation of TE leiomyosarcomas (LMS).MethodsPatients from the US Sarcoma Collaborative database with primary, high-grade TE STS were identified. Patients were grouped into LMS or other histology (non-LMS). Primary endpoints were locoregional recurrence-free survival (LR-RFS), distant-RFS (D-RFS), and disease specific survival (DSS).ResultsOf 1215 patients, 93 had LMS and 1122 non-LMS. In LMS patients, median age was 63 and median tumor size was 6 cm. In non-LMS patients, median age was 58 and median tumor size was 8 cm. In LMS patients, overall RR was 42% with 15% LR-RR and 29% D-RR. The 3yr LR-RFS, D-RFS, and DSS were 84%, 65%, and 76%, respectively.When considering high-risk (>5 cm and high-grade, n = 49) LMS patients, the overall RR was 45% with 12% LR-RR and 35% D-RR. 61% received radiation. The 3yr LR-RFS (78vs93%, p = 0.39), D-RFS (53vs63%, p = 0.27), and DSS (67vs91%, p = 0.17) were similar in those who did and did not receive radiation. High-risk, non-LMS patients had a similar overall RR of 42% with 15% LR-RR and 30% D-RR. 60% of non-LMS patients received radiation. There was an improved 3yr LR-RFS (82vs75%, p = 0.030) and DSS (77vs65%,p = 0.007) in non-LMS patients who received radiation.ConclusionsIn our cohort, patients with LMS have a low local recurrence rate (12–15%) and modest distant recurrence rate (29–35%). However, LMS patients had no improvement in local control or long-term outcomes with radiation. The value of radiation in these patients merits further investigation.     

Long-term outcomes following salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: A 15-year follow-up study

BackgroundLocally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is a complex problem requiring multidisciplinary consultation and specialized surgical care. Given the paucity of published longer-term survival data, skepticism persists regarding the benefit of major extirpative surgery. We investigated ultra-long-term (~15 years) outcomes following radical resection of LRRC and sought relevant clinicopathologic prognostic variables.MethodsA cohort of 52 consecutive patients who underwent resection of LRRC at our institution between 1997 and 2005 were followed with serial exams and imaging up to the point of death, or 30/06/2019.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 16.5 years (9.9–18.3) for patients who were alive at last follow-up; only one patient was lost to follow-up, at 9.9 years. For the entire cohort of 52 patients, disease-specific survival (DSS) at 5, 10, and 15 years following salvage surgery was 41%, 33%, and 31%, respectively. All patients who had distant metastatic disease at the time of LRRC resection (n = 6) subsequently died of cancer, at a median of 21 months (4−46). In those without distant metastases at time of salvage surgery (n = 46), DSS at 5, 10, and 15 years was 47%, 38%, and 35%, respectively, median 60 months. Negative resection margin (R0) was independently predictive of superior outcomes. In patients with M0 disease who had R0 resection (n = 37), DSS at 5, 10 and 15 years was 58%, 47%, and 44%, respectively, median 73 months. No patient developed re-recurrence after 5.5 years.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates exceptionally durable long-term cancer-free survival following salvage surgery for LRRC, indicating that cure is possible.     

Pulmonary metastasectomy for soft tissue sarcoma – Report from a dual institution experience at the Medical University of Vienna

BackgroundPulmonary metastasectomy when possible has become therapeutic standard in soft tissue sarcoma patients. However, published reports frequently describe mixed series of patients with bone or soft tissue sarcoma. We report the outcome of 46 soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy (PM).MethodsThis current analysis includes retrospective survival data from 46 consecutive STS patients with pulmonary metastases who underwent PM at the Medical University of Vienna between January 2003 and December 2013.ResultsIn total 72 pulmonary metastasectomies were performed. 322 metastatic nodules were resected with a median number of four nodules per intervention and the R0 resection rate was 97.2%. The postoperative complication rate as documented was low. Median follow-up (mFU) was 31.8 months (range 3.7–127.4). Median overall survival as calculated from first detection of metastatic disease was 47.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI) = 36.2–58.1 months) and 45.3 months (95% CI = 33.3–57.4 months) when calculated from first PM until death or last follow-up (n = 46). Five-year overall survival calculated from primary diagnosis was 62% and 32% when estimated from first PM. Previous disease free interval (DFI) as calculated from date of surgery of the primary tumour until the date of diagnosis of lung metastasis was 12.2 months (range 0–140.1 months). Median relapse-free survival (mRFS) after first PM to the date of recurrence of lung metastasis, death or last follow-up was 13.4 months (95% CI = 3–23.8 months).ConclusionMedian overall survival in this selected patient cohort is 45.3 months. Despite the lack of prospective randomised controlled trials, PM is a reasonable treatment strategy in selected patients.     

Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the intermediate-term oncological outcomes after (RAL-NU) for UUT-UC.Patients and MethodsBetween May 2007 and December 2010, 32 patients with UUT-UC underwent RAL-NU. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database.ResultsMedian patient age was 66.5 years. Final pathological stage was pathologic stage Ta (pTa) in 12.5% (n = 4) of patients, pT1 in 28.1% (n = 9), pT2 in 18.8% (n = 6), pT3 in 40.6% (n = 13), and pT4 in 0%. High-grade lesions were present in 81.2% (n = 26) of patients and multifocal disease was present in 25.0% (n = 8). Positive surgical margins occurred in 1 patient. Median follow-up was 45.5 months (range, 24-65). At 2 and 5 years, overall survival was 81.3% and 60.9%; cancer-specific survival was 87.3% and 75.8%, and nonurothelial recurrence-free survival was 71.5% and 68.1%, respectively. On univariate analysis, female sex, positive surgical margins, and pathological tumor stage pT2 and higher are associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (P = .035 and .011, respectively). On multivariate analysis, only female sex and pathological stage pT2 or higher were significant factors (P = .020 and .049, respectively). No factors were found to affect cancer-specific survival.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this represents the largest and longest follow-up after RAL-NU to date. Intermediate-term oncological outcomes seem comparable with those of open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. We recommend further larger studies with longer follow-up periods to further define the role of RAL-NU in the treatment of UUT-UC.     

Defining and predicting early recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BackgroundThe definition of “early recurrence (ER)” after rectal cancer surgery is currently unclear.ObjectiveTo determine an evidence-based cut-off to distinguish early and late recurrence (LR) for patients with rectal cancer and compare the clinicopathological factors between the two groups.MethodsPatients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and radical resection for locally advanced rectal cancer were included. A minimum p-value approach was used to evaluate the optimal cut-off value of recurrence-free survival to divide the patients into ER and LR groups based on overall survival. A logistic regression model was used to assess risk factors for ER.ResultsA total of 763 patients were included, of which 167 (21.9%) experienced recurrence. The optimal cut-off value of recurrence-free survival to differentiate between ER (n = 125, 74.9%) and LR (n = 42, 25.1%) was 24 months (P = 0.000001). The median postrecurrence survival of ER and LR was 12 months and 22 months, respectively (p = 0.028). The most common recurrent sites in patients with ER and LR were lung metastases, the incidence of liver metastases, however, differed considerably in ER and LR (27.2% vs 9.5%, P = 0.019). Risk factors including elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), higher ypTNM stage, positive circumferential resection margin (CRM), and perineural invasion were significantly associated with ER.ConclusionA recurrence-free interval of 24 months is the optimal cut-off value for defining ER versus LR. Elevated preoperative CEA, higher ypTNM staging, positive CRM, and perineural invasion were associated with ER of locally advanced rectal cancer.     

Survival impact of pancreatic resection for metastases in the pancreas: A retrospective multi-center study

BackgroundPancreatic metastases from other primary malignancies are rare.There is no clear evidence for a treatment strategy for this condition. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes, including prognostic factors for pancreatic resection of metastatic tumors in the pancreas, through a retrospective review.MethodsData of 35 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for pancreatic metastasis between 2005 and 2020 in eight Japanese institutions were included in this study. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons were made using the Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsThe median follow-up period was 35 months (range, 5–102 months). Median duration from resection for primary tumor to resection for metastatic pancreatic tumor was 10.6 years (range, 0.6–29.2 years). The 3- and 5-year survival rates after resection for metastatic tumors in the pancreas were 89% and 69%, respectively. In contrast, the 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates after resection for metastatic tumors in the pancreas were 48% and 21%, respectively. Performance status ≥1 at the time of resection for metastatic tumors in the pancreas (HR: 7.56, p = 0.036) and pancreatic metastasis tumor diameter >42 mm (HR: 6.39, p = 0.02) were significant poor prognostic factors only in the overall survival.ConclusionsThe prognosis of pancreatic resection for metastatic tumors in the pancreas is relatively good for selected patients. However, because it is prone to recurrence after radical surgery, it should only be considered in patients with good PS.     

Recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas: Clinical outcomes of surgical treatment and prognostic factors

Background and purposeLocoregional recurrence after resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a challenging therapeutic issue. The objective of this study was to identify clinicopathological factors predictive of overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) after reoperation for recurrent RPS.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively collected data from the medical records of 800 patients who underwent resection for sarcoma at our Institution, from 1983 to 2015. Among these patients, 120 were treated for retroperitoneal sarcoma and 55 had a locoregional recurrence (LR). Four of them did not undergo surgery and thus were excluded from this study leaving 51 cases available for data analysis. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.ResultsMedian overall survival was 33 months. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 75.5%, 47.1% and 31.6% respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that extension of surgery (P = 0.026), surgical margin status (P = 0.015) and histological grade of recurrent tumor (P = 0.047) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Median DSS was 48 months. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year DSS rates were 79.2%, 53.1% and 40.9%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, predictors of DSS were extension of surgery (P = 0.004), margin status (P = 0.011), histological grade of recurrent tumor (P = 0.008), and disease free interval (DFI) (P = 0.020). As regards histological subtype of recurrent RPS, at univariate analysis, well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) was associated with better OS and DSS (P = 0.052 and P = 0.016 respectively) compared to dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS).ConclusionsAccording to our findings, surgery is more beneficial in patients with low-grade sarcoma, WDLS and long DFI. The achievement of clear resection margins, rather than performing a multivisceral resection, appears to be a key factor to improve OS and DSS.     

Management of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Initially Diagnosed With 1 to 3 Synchronous Brain-Only Metastases: A Retrospective Study

BackgroundThe treatment options for newly diagnosed non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with 1 to 3 synchronous brain metastases (BM) remain controversial. The current study aimed to comprehensively analyze the characteristics, local treatment paradigms, and survival outcomes in these populations.Patients and MethodsA total of 252 NSCLC patients initially diagnosed with 1 to 3 synchronous brain-only metastases were enrolled onto this study. Local therapy (LT) to primary lung tumors (PLT) and BM included surgery, radiotherapy, or both. Median overall survival (mOS) was measured among patients who received LT to both PLT and BM (all-LT group), patients who were treated with LT to either PLT or BM (part-LT group), and patients who did not receive any LT (non-LT group).ResultsThe mOS for all-LT (n = 70), part-LT (n = 113), and non-LT (n = 69) groups was 33.2, 18.5, and 16.8 months, respectively (P = .002). The OS rates at 5 years for the all-LT, part-LT, and non-LT groups were 25.5%, 16.2%, and 0, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that all-LT versus non-LT, pretreatment Karnofsky performance status > 70, histology of adenocarcinoma, thoracic stage I-II, EGFR mutation, ALK positive, and second-line systemic therapies were independent prognostic factors for improved mOS.ConclusionsThe current study showed that LT for both PLT and BM is associated with superior OS in appropriately selected NSCLC patients initially diagnosed with 1 to 3 synchronous BM. Prospective trials are urgently needed to confirm this finding.     

The increasing role of abdominal metastesectomy for malignant melanoma in the era of modern therapeutics

BackgroundMetastatic spread of malignant melanoma to the abdomen presents a therapeutic challenge. Targeted and Immune-therapies dramatically improve patients’ survival, yet some patients may still benefit from surgical intervention. This study investigates the outcomes of surgical treatment of abdominal metastatic melanoma in the era of modern therapy.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent surgical resection for abdominal metastatic melanoma between the years 2009–2021 (n = 80). We examined the clinical, operative, perioperative, and oncological outcomes of these patients.ResultsThe cohort included a therapeutic group (T, n = 43) and palliative group (P, n = 37). The rate of overall post-operative complications was lower in the T group (n = 3, 9.3%) compared to the P group (n = 10, 27.1%) (p = 0.04), but no difference in major complications rate (p = 0.41). The median follow-up was 13.4 months (range, 0.5–107), with an estimated 2- and 5-years survival of 66.5% and 45.3% respectively. The estimated 2- and 5-years survival of the T group was 76.61% and 69.65%, and 49.01% and 28.01% in the P group (p = 0.005). Univariate analysis identified Therapeutic resection (HR 3.2, p = 0.008), isolated lesions (HR 1.47, p = 0.033) and major complication score (HR 1.8, p=<0.001) to be correlated with survival. On multivariate analysis, Therapeutic resection (HR 2.53, p = 0.042) and major complication score (HR 1.62, p = 0.004) remained significant independent factors correlated with survival. In patients who progressed on treatment, and their progression was treated with surgical resection 46.1% where able to be maintained on the same preoperative treatment strategy.ConclusionWe have demonstrated that abdominal metastesectomy is a safe and oncologically efficacious therapy in selected patients. Especially in the era of modern therapeutics, patients with isolated disease site, limited resectable progression on therapy, or patients with symptomatic metastases should be considered for surgical resection.     

Comparative study of mucinous and non-mucinous appendiceal neoplasms with peritoneal dissemination treated by cyoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)

BackgroundAppendiceal non-mucinous neoplasms (AnMN) are rare and poorly understood malignancies with no standard treatment. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is largely used to treat peritoneal disseminations from appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMN), but its role with AnMN is unclear.MethodsA prospective database of 315 patients with advanced appendiceal primaries undergoing CRS/HIPEC during 1996–2020 was reviewed. Baseline characteristics, operative and long-term outcomes of AnMN were compared with those of AMN. AMN were categorized according to PSOGI classification into high-grade, low-grade, and acellular mucin (AC), based on peritoneal disease histology.ResultsTwenty-three patients (7.3%) with goblet cell carcinoma (GCC; n = 9), intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC; n = 12), and mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC; n = 2) were identified. AnMN patients were more likely to be males (P = 0.006), have preoperative systemic chemotherapy (P = 0.001), grossly incomplete CRS (P = 0.001), and nodal metastases (P = 0.001), but not systemic relapse after CRS/HIPEC (P = 0.133). Median follow-up was 25.1 months (range 0.8–77.3) for AnMN, and 80.9 months (range 0.1–279.2) for AMN. Median overall survival was 24.0 months for AnMN, 66.2 months for high-grade AMN (P = 0.015), 160.0 months for low-grade ANM (P = 0.001), and not reached for AC (P = 0.001). Among AnMN patients, median survival was 23.4 months for GCC, 38.7 months for ITAC, 20.3 months for MANEC (P = 0.855). In the overall series, histological subtype (P = 0.001), incomplete cytoreduction (P = 0.001), and positive lymph-nodes (P = 0.003) correlated with poorer survival at multivariate analysis.ConclusionsAnMN share with AMN a predominant local-regional dissemination pattern, but prognosis after CRS/HIPEC is worse. This strategy needs to be carefully considered for AnMN. patients.     

Outcomes following synchronous liver resection,cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases: A bi-institutional study

PurposeSynchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal liver (CRLM) and peritoneal metastases (CRPM) has traditionally been contraindicated. However, latest practice promotes specialist, multidisciplinary-led consideration for select patients. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of synchronous resection in the management of CRLM and CRPM from two tertiary referral centres.MethodThis bi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study included patients undergoing simultaneous liver resection, CRS and HIPEC for metastatic colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020. Patients treated with ablative liver techniques, staged operative approaches and extra abdominal disease were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with survival and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV).ResultsTwenty-three patients were included. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 9 (range 0–22). There were two major liver resections and 21 minor resections. CC-0 resections were achieved in all patients. Major morbidity occurred in 7 patients. There were no deaths at 90 days. PCI was independently associated with morbidity (p = 0.04). PCI >10 (p = 0.069), major morbidity (p = 0.083) and presence of KRAS mutation (p = 0.052) approached significance for poor OS. Median follow up was 21 months (4–54 months). Median OS was 37 months, 3-year survival 54%, and median DFS 18 months.ConclusionSynchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC is feasible in selected patients with low-volume CRPM and CRLM. Increasing PCI is associated with postoperative major morbidity, and should be considered during operative planning.     

Sequential Targeted Therapy After Pazopanib Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: Efficacy and Toxicity

Introduction/BackgroundPatients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in whom first-line therapies have failed might derive clinical benefit with sequential targeted agents. Limited data are available on the efficacy and toxicity of subsequent therapies after disease progression during pazopanib therapy.Patients and MethodsPatients with mRCC who received subsequent systemic treatment after pazopanib treatment failure were identified across 7 institutions. Pazopanib was given as first-line therapy in 28 patients and after cytokines therapy in 7 patients. Clinical outcome and toxicity analyses of 2 sequential treatment options (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor [mTORi]) is presented.ResultsSubsequent therapy was anti-VEGF in 22 patients and mTORi in 13. One patient who received bevacizumab and temsirolimus combination was excluded. VEGF-targeted therapies included sorafenib (n = 10), sunitinib (n = 3), bevacizumab (n = 2), cediranib (n = 4) and cabozantinib (n = 3). Patients treated with mTORi received everolimus. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months from the start of subsequent therapy with anti-VEGF and 2.4 months with mTORi (P = .009). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different (P = .68). Clinical benefit (including partial response and stable disease) on subsequent therapy was observed in 15 patients (64%) and 4 patients (31%) of anti–VEGF- and everolimus-treated patients, respectively (P = .021).ConclusionIn this retrospective study, targeting VEGF was an effective strategy after disease progression during pazopanib treatment, although OS was not different among patients treated with VEGF or mTORi.     

The role of surgery for locally recurrent and second recurrent rectal cancer with metastatic disease

BackgroundThe role of surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) with resectable distant metastases or second LRRC remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the influence of synchronous distant metastases (SDMs), a history of distant metastasis resection (HDMR), and a second LRRC on the outcome.MethodsThe long-term outcomes of 70 surgically treated patients with LRRC between 2006 and 2018 were compared by SDM (n = 10), HDMR (n = 17), and second LRRC (n = 7).ResultsAmong the 10 patients with SDM, 4 patients underwent simultaneous resection, whereas the other 6 underwent staged resection with distant first approach. Recurrence developed in 9 patients, of which 2 patients with liver re-resection achieved long-term survival without cancer. The patients with and without SDM had equivalent 5-year overall survival rate (40.5% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.519); however, patients with SDM had a worse 3-year recurrence-free survival rate than those without SDM (10.0% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis showed that primary non-sphincter-preserving surgery, second LRRC, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for overall survival. Similarly, primary non-sphincter-preserving surgery, second LRRC, SDM, and R1 resection were risk factors for recurrence-free survival.ConclusionsPatients with SDM might still be suitable to undergo salvage surgery and achieve favourable overall survival. Distant metastasectomy should be performed first, followed by a sufficient interval to avoid unnecessary LRRC resection in uncurable patients. An HDMR should not be taken into consideration when making surgical plans. Surgical indication of second LRRC should be strict, especially in referred patients.     

HSP90 expression and early recurrence in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Potential for a novel therapeutic target

BackgroundHeat shock protein (HSP)-90 promotes tumor growth and is overexpressed in many malignancies. HSP90 expression profile and its potential as a therapeutic target in primary and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are not known.MethodsHSP90 cytoplasmic expression and Ki-67 index were re-reviewed and scored by a pathologist blinded to all other clinicopathologic variables for patients who underwent resection of primary and metastatic gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors at a single institution (2000–2013). Primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS).ResultsOf 263 tumors reviewed, 73% (n = 191) were primary GEP NETs, and 12% (n = 31) were NET liver metastases. Of the primary GEP-NETs, mean age was 56 years, 42% were male; 53% (n = 103) were pancreatic and 23% (n = 44) were small bowel. HSP90 expression was high in 34% (n = 64) and low in 66% (n = 127). Compared to low expression, high HSP90 was associated with advanced T-stage (T3/T4) (47 vs 27%; p = 0.02). Among patients who underwent curative-intent resections for primary, non-metastatic NETs (n = 145), high HSP90 was independently associated with worse RFS (HR 5.09, 95% CI 1.65–15.74; p = 0.005), after accounting for positive margin, LN involvement, increased tumor size, site of primary tumor, and Ki-67. When assessing NET liver metastases, 13% (n = 4) had high HSP90 expression and 87% (n = 26) had low expression. Patients with liver metastases with high HSP90 tended to have worse 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (25%, 25%) compared to those with low HSP90 (69%, 49%; p = 0.059).ConclusionHSP90 exhibits differential expression in resected GEP-NETs and liver metastases. High cytoplasmic expression is associated with early disease recurrence, even after accounting for other adverse pathologic factors. HSP90 inhibition may be a potential therapeutic target for neuroendocrine tumors.     

Survival in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer is determined by the duration and response of neoadjuvant therapy

BackgroundPancreatic cancer is the 8th commonest cancer and the 5th commonest cause of cancer-related death in Australia, with a 9% average 5-year survival. This study aims to investigate the effects of neoadjuvant treatment on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic adenocarcinoma followed by curative resection.Materials and methodsProspectively-collected demographic, medical, surgical and pathological data of patients with BRPC and LAPC treated with both neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgery at a single tertiary referral centre in Australia were reviewed and analysed.ResultsBetween 2012 and 2018, 60 patients, 34 with BRPC and 26 with LAPC, were treated with NAT followed by curative resection. The commonest neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were Gemcitabine + Abraxane (51.7%) and FOLFIRINOX (35.0%), with 48.3% of patients additionally receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Median RFS was 30 months and median OS was 35 months. On multivariable analysis, inferior OS was predicted by enlarged loco-regional lymph nodes on initial computed tomography (p = 0.032), larger tumour size post-NAT (p = 0.006) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events post-NAT toxicity greater than grade 2 (p = 0.015). LAPC patients received more neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.008) and radiotherapy (p = 0.021) than BRPC and achieved a superior pathological response (p = 0.010).ConclusionPatients who respond to NAT likely have a favourable disease biology and will progress well following resection. It is these patients who should be selected for more aggressive upfront management, and those with resistant disease should be spared from high-risk surgery.