Association between health insurance coverage and uptake of seasonal influenza vaccine in Brazos County,Texas

BackgroundLack of health insurance may limit access to influenza vaccination, resulting in higher risk of infection.MethodsThe Brazos County Health Department obtained medical records summarizing vaccination and health insurance status of all influenza cases occurring in December 2017 (n = 417). The odds of influenza vaccination were estimated for those with public or private health insurance as compared to uninsured individuals using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and race.ResultsHealth insurance coverage among Brazos County residents with influenza was 62.4%. Public and private health insurance was associated with higher odds of influenza vaccination compared to no insurance (aOR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.00–4.21 and aOR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.07–2.92, respectively), particularly among adults 18–64 years of age.ConclusionsInfluenza vaccination is strongly associated with health insurance. Expansion of programs that facilitate access to health services or provide free influenza vaccines may improve influenza prevention among the uninsured.     

我国6个省份全人群流感疫苗接种及认知情况调查

目的 了解调查地区全年龄组人群流感预防知识的认知及流感疫苗接种情况，探索影响流感疫苗接种的相关因素。方法 采用横断面调查设计，选择北京市、内蒙古自治区、上海市、广东省、云南省和甘肃省6个省份，通过12320卫生热线采用随机数字表拨打电话的抽样方法，于2018年3-5月开展全年龄组人群的流感防控知识、流感疫苗接种情况的电话调查，调查估计样本量为9 438人。结果 本调查应答率为46.4%（10 045/21 658），10 045名调查对象中，"流感和普通感冒有区别"的知晓率为75.3%（7 564/10 045），"流感病毒会引起严重后果"的知晓率为82.0%（8 241/10 045）。出现流感样症状后采取频繁洗手、戴口罩和自我隔离的健康行为率分别为80.4%（7 936/9 873）、75.8%（7 506/9 899）和73.6%（7 228/9 822）。最近1年流感疫苗接种率为5.7%（570/10 037）。最近1年流感疫苗接种率的相关多因素logistic回归分析结果显示，调查对象来自甘肃省或北京市、职业是医务人员或全日制学生、调查对象共同居住人数≥ 2人、出现流感样症状后戴口罩，最近1年流感疫苗接种率相对较高。结论 6个省份调查对象流感相关知识的知晓率、出现流感相关症状后的健康行为率和最近1年流感疫苗接种率均有待进一步提高。应加强流感预防知识和疫苗接种的健康教育，探索流感疫苗免费接种策略。     

Prevalence of influenza vaccination in a high-risk population: impact of age and race

Participants in a Nashville Davidson County survey were queried regarding influenza vaccination, with the goal of developing strategies to improve vaccination coverage in the county. The Metropolitan Public Health Department used a locally adapted version of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in a random-digit-dialing phone survey with a sample of 7901 residents of Davidson County, Tennessee, about health-related behaviors. Out of 7233 fully completed surveys, data for 7016 were analyzed. Thirty-six percent of the respondents were male; 17% were aged 18-24, 40% were aged 25-44, 26% were aged 45-64, and 16% were aged 65 or older. Seventy-six percent were white. Forty-five percent reported a chronic illness, increasing their risk for complications from influenza; 11% had asthma, 7% diabetes, 25% hypercholesterolemia, and 28% hypertension. Predictors for receipt of influenza vaccine were older age, presence of a primary care provider, health insurance, and employment. Those with chronic diseases were more likely to be vaccinated when compared to the general population. Among those 65 and older, blacks were less likely to be vaccinated (OR = 0.57, CI = 0.43, 0.76). The substantial disparity in receipt of influenza vaccine reflects the lack of recommendations and policies for vaccination coverage and suggests the need for greater community-based efforts to improve the preventive health behaviors of healthcare professionals and the public. In addition, new vaccine delivery strategies and systematic vaccination marketing efforts may be needed to increase influenza vaccination rates in communities of color and other underserved populations.     

Evaluation of Japanese people's perception of risk information for making decisions to receive influenza and rubella vaccinations

BackgroundGenerally, vaccination uptake in Japan lags behind World Health Organization targets.ObjectiveThis study aimed to understand how risk information and advice affect intention to receive vaccinations.MethodsThis study had a within‐subjects design. An online survey based on the Health Belief Model was sent to 2501 Japanese individuals (≧20 years) to assess the intention to be vaccinated for influenza and rubella after receiving minor and severe risk information and hypothetical advice about each vaccine. Regression analysis was used to measure changes in intentions to receive each vaccination after being provided with (1) risk information about each vaccine and (2) hypothetical encouragement and discouragement to be vaccinated.Main OutcomesThe main outcomes included changes in vaccination intentions from baseline.ResultsForty‐one percent (N = 1030) of those sent the survey completed it. At baseline, 43% and 65% of the respondents intended to have influenza and rubella vaccinations, respectively. Being provided with information about severe risks and susceptibility increased the intention to have the influenza vaccination among females in their 40s. Receiving inaccurate and discouraging information from one''s mother significantly decreased the intention to have the rubella vaccination. Women 50 and older were more likely to intend not to have vaccination for rubella. Severe risk information decreased rubella vaccination intention in all age groups, except women in their 30s and 40s (p < .05).ConclusionFor both vaccinations, older individuals demonstrated vaccine hesitancy. This group requires tailored messaging to help them understand their vulnerability (to influenza) and their role in transmission (for rubella) to encourage uptake of essential vaccinations.Patient or Public ContributionMembers of the Japanese public responded to our online questionnaire on vaccination risk.     

我国两个地区儿童流感疫苗与肺炎疫苗接种现状与影响因素分析

目的 了解儿童流感疫苗和肺炎疫苗的接种行为与影响因素。方法 采用两阶段整群抽样,在北京市通州区和甘肃省白银市对适龄儿童家长开展横断面问卷调查,分析儿童流感疫苗和肺炎疫苗接种率及影响因素。结果 共纳入2 377名儿童,儿童流感疫苗接种率为35.93%,肺炎疫苗接种率为16.58%,两种疫苗均接种率为11.65%。接种两种疫苗的理由占比前三位分别为认为疾病严重（流感疫苗：36.02%;肺炎疫苗：49.61%）、学校、单位要求接种（流感疫苗：28.76%;肺炎疫苗：25.45%）和认为疾病易感（流感疫苗：26.41%;肺炎疫苗：13.88%）;未接种疫苗的理由前三位分别为个人方面、疫苗本身和疫苗供应。家庭居住地为农村是影响两类疫苗接种的重要因素。子女数量>1个的家庭、家庭居住地为农村和家庭人均年收入较低与两类疫苗的接种呈负相关。结论 调查地区儿童流感疫苗和肺炎疫苗接种率较低,农村家庭、多子女家庭是扩大疫苗接种的重点关注人群。加强疫苗相关知识宣教,引导家长正确认知疫苗安全性问题,协调疫苗供应与降低疫苗价格对提高流感疫苗和肺炎疫苗接种率具有促进作用。     

Barriers and activities to implementing or expanding influenza vaccination programs in low- and middle-income countries: A global survey

IntroductionDespite considerable global burden of influenza, few low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have national influenza vaccination programs. This report provides a systematic assessment of barriers to and activities that support initiating or expanding influenza vaccination programs from the perspective of in-country public health officials.MethodsPublic health officials in LMICs were sent a web-based survey to provide information on barriers and activities to initiating, expanding, or maintaining national influenza vaccination programs. The survey primarily included Likert-scale questions asking respondents to rank barriers and activities in five categories.ResultsOf 109 eligible countries, 62% participated. Barriers to influenza vaccination programs included lack of data on cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination programs (87%) and on influenza disease burden (84%), competing health priorities (80%), lack of public perceived risk from influenza (79%), need for better risk communication tools (77%), lack of financial support for influenza vaccine programs (75%), a requirement to use only WHO-prequalified vaccines (62%), and young children require two vaccine doses (60%). Activities for advancing influenza vaccination programs included educating healthcare workers (97%) and decision-makers (91%) on the benefits of influenza vaccination, better estimates of influenza disease burden (91%) and cost of influenza vaccination programs (89%), simplifying vaccine introduction by focusing on selected high-risk groups (82%), developing tools to prioritize target populations (80%), improving availability of influenza diagnostic testing (79%), and developing collaborations with neighboring countries for vaccine procurement (74%) and regulatory approval (73%). Responses varied by country region and income status.ConclusionsLocal governments and key international stakeholders can use the results of this survey to improve influenza vaccination programs in LMICs, which is a critical component of global pandemic preparedness for influenza and other pathogens such as coronaviruses. Additionally, strategies to improve global influenza vaccination coverage should be tailored to country income level and geographic location.     

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Uptake of Influenza Vaccine: UK-Wide Observational Study

BackgroundIn the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, the UK National Health Service (NHS) extended eligibility for influenza vaccination this season to approximately 32.4 million people (48.8% of the population). Knowing the intended uptake of the vaccine will inform supply and public health messaging to maximize vaccination.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the acceptance of influenza vaccination in the 2020-2021 season, specifically focusing on people who were previously eligible but routinely declined vaccination and newly eligible people.MethodsIntention to receive the influenza vaccine in 2020-2021 was asked of all registrants of the largest electronic personal health record in the NHS by a web-based questionnaire on July 31, 2020. Of those who were either newly or previously eligible but had not previously received an influenza vaccination, multivariable logistic regression and network diagrams were used to examine their reasons to undergo or decline vaccination.ResultsAmong 6641 respondents, 945 (14.2%) were previously eligible but were not vaccinated; of these, 536 (56.7%) intended to receive an influenza vaccination in 2020-2021, as did 466 (68.6%) of the newly eligible respondents. Intention to receive the influenza vaccine was associated with increased age, index of multiple deprivation quintile, and considering oneself to be at high risk from COVID-19. Among those who were eligible but not intending to be vaccinated in 2020-2021, 164/543 (30.2%) gave reasons based on misinformation. Of the previously unvaccinated health care workers, 47/96 (49%) stated they would decline vaccination in 2020-2021.ConclusionsIn this sample, COVID-19 has increased acceptance of influenza vaccination in previously eligible but unvaccinated people and has motivated substantial uptake in newly eligible people. This study is essential for informing resource planning and the need for effective messaging campaigns to address negative misconceptions, which is also necessary for COVID-19 vaccination programs.     

Association of culturally competent care with influenza vaccination coverage in the United States

BackgroundCultural minority groups in the United States have lower vaccination rates or worse influenza-related outcomes. Culturally competent care, which aims to engage the social, cultural, and linguistic needs of all patients, may address some of these disparities.ObjectiveWe investigate how self-reported measures of culturally competent care is associated with influenza vaccination rates in the United States.MethodsThe National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2017 was queried for respondents asked a set of questions which assessed respondents’ access to culturally competent care in the past year. The outcome of interest was self-reported receipt of the annual influenza vaccine. Sample-weighted multivariable logistic regressions estimated the adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) of influenza vaccination with response to the cultural competency survey questions as the dependent variable of interest. Subsequent marginal modeling predicted the adjusted vaccination rates among cultural minorities (racial/ethnic minorities, LGBTQ + adults, foreign-born individuals, and non-English speakers) and respondents with high-risk comorbidities for worse influenza outcomes. Models were adjusted for other known determinants of vaccination coverage.Results20,303 sample adults were included in the analyses. There were significantly higher odds of influenza vaccination among respondents who were “always” or “most of the time” treated with respect by their providers (aOR 1.53, 95 %CI [1.23–1.90], P < 0.001), given easy-to-understand information (aOR 1.37, 95 %CI [1.19–1.58], P < 0.001), asked about their opinions or beliefs about their care (aOR 1.29, 95 %CI [1.19–1.39], P < 0.001), and seen by providers who shared or understood their culture (aOR 1.15 95 %CI [1.01–1.30], P = 0.03), compared to their counterparts who responded with “some” or “none of the time” to the same survey questions. Higher adjusted influenza vaccination rates were seen among multiple racial/ethnic groups, LGBTQ + adults, foreign-born individuals, non-English speakers, and individuals with high-risk comorbidities who reported positive responses to the cultural competency survey questions.ConclusionsWe demonstrate a positive association between self-reported frequency of access to culturally competent care and receipt of the annual influenza vaccine. These findings support future efforts to evaluate vaccination outcomes among patients who receive components of culturally competent care, such as linguistically appropriate services, race-concordant healthcare workforce, and community engagement.     

Reasons for low influenza vaccination coverage among adults in Puerto Rico,influenza season 2013–2014

BackgroundInfluenza vaccination is recommended annually for all persons 6 months and older. Reports of increased influenza-related morbidity and mortality during the 2013–2014 influenza season raised concerns about low adult influenza immunization rates in Puerto Rico. In order to inform public health actions to increase vaccination rates, we surveyed adults in Puerto Rico regarding influenza vaccination-related attitudes and barriers.MethodsA random-digit-dialing telephone survey (50% landline: 50% cellphone) regarding influenza vaccination, attitudes, practices and barriers was conducted November 19–25, 2013 among adults in Puerto Rico. Survey results were weighted to reflect sampling design and adjustments for non-response.ResultsAmong 439 surveyed, 229 completed the survey with a 52% response rate. Respondents’ median age was 55 years; 18% reported receiving 2013–2014 influenza vaccination. Among 180 unvaccinated respondents, 38% reported barriers associated with limited access to vaccination, 24% reported they did not want or need influenza vaccination, and 20% reported safety concerns. Vaccinated respondents were more likely to know if they were recommended for influenza vaccination, to report greater perceived risk of influenza illness, and to report being less concerned about influenza vaccine safety (p-value < 0.05). Of the 175 respondents who saw a healthcare provider (HCP) since July 1, 2013, 38% reported their HCP recommended influenza vaccination and 17% were offered vaccination. Vaccination rates were higher among adults who received a recommendation and/or offer of influenza vaccination (43% vs. 14%; p-value < 0.01).ConclusionsFailure of HCP to recommend and/or offer influenza vaccination and patient attitudes (low perceived risk of influenza virus infection) may have contributed to low vaccination rates during the 2013–2014 season. HCP and public health practitioners should strongly recommend influenza vaccination and provide vaccinations during clinical encounters or refer patients for vaccination.     

Regional variation in human papillomavirus vaccination uptake and completion among adolescents 13–17 in the state of Texas

BackgroundHPV vaccination rates remain low in the United States despite efforts to increase them, although rates vary geographically both at the state and regional level within the United States. This study examines differences in teen HPV vaccination rates and associated sociodemographic factors among six regions in Texas to understand potential variation in smaller regions. These differences may inform planning of local public health interventions aimed at increasing vaccination uptake in teens.MethodsWe analyzed sociodemographic and vaccination data for a total of 2256 teens 13–17 years old from six regions in Texas using the 2017 National Immunization Survey--Teen (NIS-Teen). We used survey-weighted chi-squared tests to compare demographic characteristics and HPV vaccination initiation and series completion across regions and multivariable robust Poisson regression models to examine the association between region of residence and HPV vaccination outcomes.ResultsRates of initiation and completion of the HPV vaccine series varied significantly between six regions in Texas and were both highest in El Paso County and lowest in Dallas County (initiation 82.8% vs 52.5%, P < 0.001; completion 51.3% vs 30.2%, P < 0.001). Adjusted multivariable log binomial regression models demonstrated that teens in Dallas county were significantly less likely to initiate the HPV vaccine series than teens in Travis county (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: (0.65, 0.95), P = 0.01).DiscussionHPV vaccination uptake varied significantly between six regions in Texas, highlighting the importance of closely examining local regions in public health planning efforts. Intervention efforts should consider the variation in sociodemographic characteristics as well as policy at the regional level to best improve vaccination rates in communities across the nation.     

Influenza vaccination hesitancy and its determinants among elderly in China: A national cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe Chinese elderly face a significant threat from seasonal influenza, owing to the consistently low vaccination coverage. This study investigated the prevalence and determinants of influenza vaccination hesitancy among the Chinese elderly.MethodsIn 2019, 3849 elderly individuals from 10 provinces in China were recruited in a cross-sectional survey. Multinomial logistic regression was applied to investigate the determinants of influenza vaccination hesitancy.ResultsAmong the elderly respondents, 37.18% expressed some degree of hesitancy towards influenza vaccination: 19.28% were hesitant, and 17.90% refused influenza vaccination, including 19.28% acceptors with doubts and 17.90% refusers. Only 39.10% of the respondents considered themselves as the priority group for influenza vaccination, and 13.93% reported receiving a recommendation for vaccination from healthcare workers. Respondents with higher education levels and from urban areas had significantly higher odds of vaccine hesitancy than their counterparts. Confidence in the safety of vaccines was negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy, but confidence in vaccine efficacy had no such association. Respondents who perceived themselves as highly susceptible to influenza (AOR = 0.85; 95 %CI = 0.77–0.93) and those aware of the elderly as a priority group for influenza vaccination (AOR = 0.51; 95 %CI = 0.41–0.64) had a significantly lower odds of being refusers.ConclusionThis study found a high prevalence of hesitancy towards influenza vaccination among the Chinese elderly, especially well-educated and urban-dwelling respondents. The government should address vaccine hesitancy through culturally appropriate communication, subsidies for vaccination, and actively promoting vaccines through primary care professionals.     

Low uptake of influenza vaccine among university students: Evaluating predictors beyond cost and safety concerns

IntroductionAnnual influenza vaccine coverage for young adults (including college students) remains low, despite a 2011 US recommendation for annual immunization of all people 6 months and older. College students are at high risk for influenza morbidity given close living and social spaces and extended travel during semester breaks when influenza circulation typically increases. We evaluated influenza vaccine uptake following an on-campus vaccine campaign at a large, public New York State university.MethodsConsecutive students visiting the University Health Center were recruited for a self-administered, anonymous, written survey. Students were asked about recent influenza vaccination, barriers to influenza vaccination, and willingness to get vaccinated to protect other vulnerable individuals they may encounter. Frequencies and proportions were evaluated.ResultsOf 653 students approached, 600 completed surveys (92% response proportion); respondents were primarily female (61%) and non-Hispanic white (59%). Influenza vaccine coverage was low (28%). Compared to coverage among non-Hispanic white students (30%), coverage was similar among Hispanic (30%) and other race/ethnicity students (28%) and lowest among non-Hispanic black students (17%). Among the unvaccinated, the most commonly selected vaccination barriers were “Too lazy to get the vaccine” (32%) and “Don’t need the vaccine because I’m healthy” (29%); 6% of unvaccinated students cited cost as a barrier. After being informed that influenza vaccination of young, healthy people can protect other vulnerable individuals (e.g., infants, elderly), 71% of unvaccinated students indicated this would increase their willingness to get vaccinated.ConclusionsInfluenza vaccine uptake among college students is very low. While making vaccine easily obtained may increase vaccine uptake, college students need to be motivated to get vaccinated. Typically healthy students may not perceive a need for influenza vaccine. Education about vaccinating healthy individuals to prevent the spread of influenza to close contacts, such as vulnerable family members, may provide this motivation to get vaccinated.     

Influenza vaccine acceptance among pregnant women in urban slum areas,Karachi, Pakistan

BackgroundFacilitators and barriers to influenza vaccination among pregnant women in the developing world are poorly understood, particularly in South Asia. We assessed intention to accept influenza vaccine among ethnically diverse low-income pregnant women in Pakistan.MethodsFrom May to August 2013, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of pregnant women who visited health centers in urban slums in Karachi city. We assessed intention to accept influenza vaccine against socio-demographic factors, vaccination history, vaccine recommendation sources, and other factors.ResultsIn an unvaccinated study population of 283 respondents, 87% were willing to accept the vaccine, if offered. All except two participants were aware of symptoms typically associated with influenza. Perceived vaccine safety, efficacy, and disease susceptibility were significantly associated with intention to accept influenza vaccine (p < 0.05). Regardless of intention to accept influenza vaccine, 96% rated healthcare providers as highly reliable source of vaccine information. While a recommendation from a physician was critical for influenza vaccine acceptance, parents-in-law and husbands were often considered the primary decision-makers for pregnant women seeking healthcare including vaccination.ConclusionsMaternal influenza vaccination initiatives in South Asia should strongly consider counseling of key familial decision-makers and inclusion of healthcare providers to help implement new vaccination programs.     

Moving the needle on nursing staff influenza vaccination in long-term care: Results of an evidence-based intervention

PurposeInfluenza vaccination rates among healthcare providers (HCPs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are commonly below the Healthy People 2020 goal of 90%. This study was conducted to develop and evaluate an intervention program designed to increase influenza uptake among HCPs in LTCFs.MethodsThis study was conducted in four Midwestern LTCFs. Baseline interviews, surveys, and administrative data analysis were performed following the 2013–2014 influenza season. Interventions implemented during the 2014–2015 season were based on the health belief and ecological models and included goal-setting worksheets, policy development, educational programs, kick-off events, incentives, a vaccination tracking roster, and facility-wide communication about vaccine uptake among HCPs. Outcomes were evaluated in 2015.ResultsAt baseline, 50% of 726 nursing staff employed during the 2013–2014 influenza season had documented receipt of influenza vaccine (Site A: 34%; Site B: 5%; Site C: 75%; Site D: 62%), and 31% of 347 survey respondents reported absenteeism due to respiratory illness. At follow-up, 85% of HCPs had documented receipt of influenza vaccine (p < 0.01) and 19% of 323 survey respondents reported absenteeism due to respiratory illness (p < 0.01). Vaccination rates among respondents’ family members increased from 31% at baseline to 44% post-intervention (p < 0.01). Reasons for declining vaccination did not change following exposure to educational programs, but HCPs were more likely to recommend vaccination to others after program implementation.ConclusionsVaccination rates among long-term care HCPs and their family members increased significantly and HCP absenteeism decreased after the implementation of multifaceted interventions based on an ecological model. The findings suggest that major increases in HCP vaccination can be achieved in LTCFs. More research is needed to evaluate the impact of increased HCP vaccination on the health and productivity of LTCF employees, their family members, and residents.     

Patient attitudes toward influenza and tetanus,diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccination in pregnancy

BackgroundRoutine influenza and tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination of pregnant women to prevent poor maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes is recommended practice; however, actual rates of influenza vaccine acceptance are typically well below the (Healthy People 2020, 2015) goal of 80%.ObjectiveWe sought to identify barriers to accepting either vaccination.Materials and MethodsFrom December 2014 to April 2015 women were given a questionnaire eliciting their experiences, attitudes and history of influenza and Tdap vaccination in pregnancy during their routine prenatal care appointments at a tertiary care center. Patient demographics were included in the questionnaire. A similar questionnaire was administered to prenatal care providers. Patient influenza and Tdap vaccination acceptance rates were compared and predictors of vaccine acceptance were analyzed with bivariate logistic regression.ResultsOut of the 400 patient questionnaires distributed, 338 (84.5%) were completed and returned; 24 of 45 (53.3%) provider questionnaires were returned. Vaccination acceptance rates were 70.7% for the influenza vaccine and 76.3% for the Tdap vaccine. The logistic regression model indicated that predictors of acceptance for either vaccine in pregnancy are patient attitude and previous vaccination history. Patient attitudes were more favorable towards Tdap than influenza vaccination. The combination of healthcare provider recommendation and educational materials was significantly predictive of both Tdap and influenza vaccine acceptance. The most common reasons given for declining the influenza vaccine were safety concerns; the most common reasons given for declining the Tdap vaccine were that patients did not think it was required again when they received the vaccine before pregnancy.ConclusionsOur study suggests that providers can improve Tdap and influenza vaccination acceptance in pregnancy by recommending the vaccination in combination with provision of educational materials on the vaccines.     

Flu vaccine coverage for recommended populations in France

ObjectivesTo estimate the size of the populations targeted by the French recommendations of the High Council for Public Health (French acronym HCSP) regarding vaccination against seasonal flu and to estimate vaccination coverage rates in these populations.Patients and methodsThe analysis was conducted on a representative sample of patients retrieved from the French Health Insurance databases during three influenza seasons (2012–2013, 2013–2014, 2014–2015). Patients targeted by the influenza vaccination recommendations were identified based on their sociodemographic characteristics and disease identification algorithms during each season. Vaccine coverage rates were estimated based on reimbursed influenza vaccines. Results were extrapolated using indirect standardization to the overall French population.ResultsPopulations targeted by the recommendations were estimated after extrapolation to 17.6, 17.8, and 18.0 million for the 2012–13, 2013–14, and 2014–15 influenza seasons, respectively. The vaccination coverage rates in these target populations were respectively estimated at 32.1%, 31.9%, and 32.1%; i.e. 44.2%, 43.1%, and 42.7% for individuals aged ≥ 65 years and 12.9%, 13.2%, and 13.7% for individuals ˂ 65 years of age presenting a risk justifying vaccination.ConclusionsImmunization coverage against influenza in France remains well below the target of 75% set by the World Health Organization. Multiple strategies combining communication, education, access program, and professional engagement could be implemented to improve this situation.     

Declining influenza vaccination rates in an underserved pediatric primary care center during the COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundInfluenza vaccination rates are decreasing in the United States. Disinformation surrounding COVID-related public health protections and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine roll-out may have unintended consequences impacting pediatric influenza vaccination. We assessed influenza vaccination rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in one pediatric primary care center, serving a minoritized population.MethodsA cross-sectional study assessed influenza vaccination rates for children aged 6 months to 12 years over the following influenza seasons (September-May): 1) 2018–19 and 2019–20 (pre-pandemic), and 2) 2020–21 and 2021–22 (intra-pandemic). Demographics and responses to social risk questionnaires were extracted from electronic health records. Total tetanus vaccinations across influenza seasons served as approximations of general vaccination rates. Generalized linear regression models with robust standard errors evaluated differences in demographics, social risks, and influenza vaccination rates by season. Multivariable logistic regression with robust standard errors evaluated associations between influenza season, demographics, social risks, and influenza vaccination.ResultsMost patients were young (mean age ～ 6 years), non-Hispanic Black (～80%), and publicly insured (～90%). Forty-two percent of patients eligible to receive the influenza vaccine who were seen in 2019–20 influenza season received the influenza vaccine, compared to 30% in 2021–22. Influenza and tetanus vaccination rates decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < 0.01). The 2020–21 and 2021–22 influenza seasons, older age, Black race, and self-pay were associated with decreased influenza vaccine administration (p < 0.05).ConclusionsInfluenza vaccination rates within one pediatric primary care center decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic and have not rebounded, particularly for older children, those identifying as Black, and those without insurance.     

Vaccination coverage in hematological patients undergoing chemotherapy: Should we move towards personalized vaccination?

IntroductionImmunocompromised patients are at high-risk for severe influenza and invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPD). Despite the French Public Health Council (FPHC) and the 7th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL7) recommendations, vaccination coverage remains insufficient. This study aimed to estimate the coverage and determinants of influenza, pneumococcal and diphtheria-tetanus-poliomyelitis (dTP) vaccinations in hematological patients underlying chemotherapy.MethodsA survey was distributed to all patients of the hematology day hospital assessing vaccine uptakes and general opinion about vaccination. Vaccine uptakes were collected from medical and vaccination records; knowledge of and attitudes towards vaccinations in immunocompromised patients were evaluated for each general practitioner (GP) by phone call. Adequacy between vaccine uptakes and indication or not to vaccinate according to ECIL7 guidelines was assessed. Factors associated with vaccine uptakes were assessed by multivariate logistic regression.ResultsAmong 145 patients, 66 % were aged 65 years or older, 40 % were followed for lymphoma and 38 % for multiple myeloma, 39 % were treated with anti-CD20 antibodies. Vaccination coverage was suboptimal for influenza (45–56 %), dTP (44 %) and IPD (16–19 %) regardless of the guidelines followed, with a wide variation in rates by information source (19–76 %). Adequacy rate with ECIL7 recommendations were 63 % and 87 % for influenza and IPD respectively. Information of patients on specific vaccinations was positively associated with flu and IPD vaccinations, as well as favorable attitude toward vaccination and age ≥ 65 years for flu vaccination, and recommendation by hematologist for pneumococcal vaccination.ConclusionDespite vaccination opportunities, the complexity of these specific recommendations and the lack of communication between the health actors could explain the suboptimal vaccination coverage in this high-risk population. A proactive attitude of all actors in the city and hospital, including better patient information and a personalized and evolving vaccination schedule to help GPs to coordinate vaccination would allow to improve vaccine coverage.     

Who receives influenza vaccinations at the Pharmacy? An analysis of the Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

IntroductionVaccination helps to prevent influenza infection and reduce associated costs but the influenza vaccination rate in Texas for adults between the ages of 18 to 64 years old is the lowest in the US. Pharmacies and alternative locations have been shown to help increase vaccination rates but many adults still go unvaccinated.ObjectiveThis research aims to determine the factors associated with obtaining influenza vaccination at the pharmacy compared to non-pharmacy locations in Texas.MethodThis study used pooled Texas Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System datasets (2014 to 2018) for this assessment. The main outcome variable was categorized into pharmacy and non-pharmacy vaccination locations and analyzed using a logistic regression analysis. Further statistical analysis was done using a multinomial logistic regression after re-categorizing the outcome variable into pharmacy, doctor office, and other locations.ResultBlacks were 63% (AOR 0.37, C.I. 0.26, 0.50) and Hispanics were 38% (AOR 0.62, C.I. 0.48, 0.80) less likely to receive influenza vaccinations at the pharmacy respectively when compared to Whites. Furthermore, those who did not live in a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) were 33% (AOR 0.67, C.I 0.53, 0.84) less likely to receive influenza vaccinations at the pharmacy compared to those who lived in an MSA. While there was no observed difference in the likelihood of receiving influenza vaccination, the unemployed population were 40% (AOR 1.40, C.I 1.15, 1.71) more likely to be vaccinated in the pharmacy compared to the employed population.ConclusionThere is potential for increased utilization of pharmacies as a source of influenza vaccination in Texas. Racial differences exist both for receiving influenza vaccinations and being vaccinated in the pharmacy. Influenza vaccination advocacy and education efforts may be necessary to improve pharmacy-based vaccination in Texas, especially for minorities and rural-dwelling Texans.     

Knowledge,attitudes and practices related to influenza illness and vaccination in children: Role of awareness campaigns in changing parents’ attitudes toward influenza vaccination in Jordan

BackgroundInfluenza infection is associated with a significant health burden in children, especially in developing countries. The influenza vaccine is an important preventive strategy for flu illness. Aim of this study to assess knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to influenza illness and vaccination in children in the Jordanian population and to study the effect of awareness campaigns on changing the attitudes of parents toward vaccinating their children against influenza.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among families visiting shopping malls and parks in November 2016. A questionnaire was administered via in-person interviews. Answers to KAP questions regarding influenza illness and vaccination were summed, with a total KAP score of 30. Facts about influenza illness and vaccination were explained to parents and provided in printed pamphlets.ResultsThere were 1241 respondents. 10.9% of participants had vaccinated their children during the last season 2015/2016. The mean KAP score (standard deviation) was 16.21 (4.61). People living in urban areas, with high monthly income >600 JD and healthcare workers had higher KAP scores than their counterparts. Compared to other sources of information about the influenza vaccine, health resources correlated most with vaccinating children. Awareness and educational pamphlets changed attitudes positively in 29% of parents who refused the influenza vaccine for their children.ConclusionsAwareness about influenza illness and vaccination is insufficient, and the coverage rate of influenza vaccination in children is low in the Jordanian population. Implementing public health policies is necessary to spread knowledge about influenza illness and vaccination and to promote the practice of receiving the influenza vaccine in children. Educational campaigns are helpful in changing the attitudes of parents toward vaccinating their children against the flu.