Favorable tumor biology in locally advanced pancreatic cancer—beyond CA19-9

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are frequently staged as unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) at the time of diagnosis. Recently, the administration of multi-agent induction chemotherapy has resulted in treatment response in up to 60% of these patients rendering their tumors technically resectable. Operative strategies have evolved to allow for successful oncologic resection of LAPC. These technically complex procedures involving vascular resections and reconstructions are now being performed with increasing safety at high-volume centers. However, even after induction therapy and successful resection, disease recurrence sometimes occurs early on, limiting the benefit of resecting the local tumor. Therefore, selection of surgical candidates should factor in each patient’s tumor biology which could result in accurate treatment guidance to improve patient outcomes while avoiding overtreatment. Well-informed patient selection is critical to improve outcomes in LAPC. Multidisciplinary teams have to determine the appropriate care for LAPC patients at the time of reevaluation after administration of induction chemotherapy. At this point the concept of favorable vs. unfavorable tumor biology becomes highly relevant and having access to biomarkers that are predictive of tumor behavior are of paramount importance. Currently, CA19-9 remains the only clinically utilized biomarker for PDAC, however, its use is limited by factors discussed in this review. While CA19-9 holds value in patient assessment, additional biomarkers are required that could supplement and improve the current ability to classify tumor biology and predict behavior in individual patients. Recent investigations on the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using liquid biopsies, as well as patient-derived organoids to characterize tumor biology have shown promise in achieving precise tumor biology-based patient stratification. Serial assessment of these biomarkers throughout therapy could supplement or even replace the anatomic criteria for resectability in the future.     

Irreversible Electroporation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Is there a role in conjunction with conventional treatment?

Background

The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is rapidly increasing. Up to 30% of patients present with locally advanced disease and therefore are not candidates for surgery. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is an emerging entity lacking in level III evidence-based recommendations for its treatment. Currently, systemic chemotherapy is the main treatment for LAPC. However, due to lack of response or disease progression, downsizing of the tumour, making it resectable is successful in only a small proportion of patients. Radiotherapy is often advocated to improve local disease control if there is stability following chemotherapy. Recently, Irreversible Electroporation (IRE), a novel non-thermal ablation technique, has been proposed for the treatment of LAPC.

New therapeutic targets in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with poor survival. Of all newly diagnosed patients, only about 20% can benefit from a potentially curative surgical resection, the remaining 80% presenting with unresectable locally advanced (LAPC) or metastatic (MPC) disease. Currently, there are limited therapeutic options for LAPC and MPC patients. Furthermore, despite intensive research efforts to better understand the molecular bases of PDAC and the biological relevance of its tumor microenvironment, treatments still largely consist of classical cytotoxic chemotherapy agents.Several studies of genetic and epigenetic sequencing have demonstrated the existence of 4 molecular PDAC subtypes, with heterogeneous genetic characteristics and different biological behaviour: squamous, pancreatic progenitor, immunogenic and aberrantly differentiated endocrine exocrine (ADEX). These distinct subtypes derive from alterations at multiple levels. Apart from the DNA repair pathway, however, none of these has so far been validated as a clinically relevant therapeutic target.Also, PDAC is unique from an immunological perspective and many studies have recently tried to elucidate the role of intratumoral effector T-cells, RAS oncogene, immunosuppressive leukocytes and desmoplastic reaction in maintaining the immunological homeostasis of this disease. However, there still remains much to be learned about the mechanisms whereby the pancreatic immune microenvironment promotes immune escape of cancer cells. Furthermore, while therapies targeting the stroma as well as immunotherapies hold promise for the future, these are not yet standard of care.This review aims to outline the state-of-the-art of LAPC and MPC treatment, highlighting data on the target therapies failure and current ongoing clinical trials on new promising therapeutic strategies.     

Neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable and non-resectable pancreatic cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly becoming a valid treatment option for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). In borderline resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy is employed to improve the probability of margin-clear resections. In non-metastatic, non-resectable pancreatic cancer, treatment primarily aims to induce disease control, but may achieve conversion to surgical resectability in some patients. Several treatment modalities including chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or the sequential use of both have been investigated in numerous, mostly small and non-randomized studies. Nevertheless, there is a consistent finding that neoadjuvant therapy can induce resectability in up to 30%–40% of LAPC patients. Once resection has been achieved, overall survival appears to be comparable to that observed for primarily resectable patients. Thus, patient selection evolves as an important aspect of neoadjuvant therapy; retrospective analyses identified induction chemotherapy as an appropriate tool to define LAPC patients who may benefit most from subsequent treatment with CRT. The clinical importance of induction chemotherapy may further increase once highly active protocols such as the FOLFIRINOX or the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimen are introduced into novel multimodality treatment concepts.     

Optimizing the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer with a focus on induction chemotherapy: Expert opinion based on a review of current evidence

Surgical resection of pancreatic cancer offers a chance of cure, but currently only 15–20% of patients are diagnosed with resectable disease, while 30–40% are diagnosed with non-metastatic, unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Treatment for LAPC usually involves systemic chemotherapy, with the aim of controlling disease progression, reducing symptoms and maintaining quality of life. In a small proportion of patients with LAPC, primary chemotherapy may successfully convert unresectable tumours to resectable tumours. In this setting, primary chemotherapy is termed ‘induction therapy’ rather than ‘neoadjuvant’. There is currently a lack of data from randomized studies to thoroughly evaluate the benefits of induction chemotherapy in LAPC, but Phase II and retrospective data have shown improved survival and high R0 resection rates. New chemotherapy regimens such as nab–paclitaxel + gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX have demonstrated improvement in overall survival for metastatic disease and shown promise as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable and borderline resectable disease. Prospective trials are underway to evaluate these regimens further as induction therapy in LAPC and preliminary data indicate a beneficial effect of FOLFIRINOX in this setting. Further research into optimal induction schedules is needed, as well as guidance on the patients who are most suitable for induction therapy. In this expert opinion article, a panel of surgeons, medical oncologists and gastrointestinal oncologists review the available evidence on management strategies for LAPC and provide their recommendations for patient care, with a particular focus on the use of induction chemotherapy.     

Neoadjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited effective therapeutic options and exceedingly high mortality rates. Currently, cure can only be achieved through resection, however the vast majority of patients present with advanced disease for which upfront surgery is not an option. In an effort to improve surgical candidacy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without radiation therapy, is often used in an effort to downstage borderline resectable and locally advanced tumors, and some argue for its use even in patients with resectable tumors. Underlying this thinking is the recognition that pancreatic cancer is simultaneously both a locally invasive and systemic disease, even in patients without evidence of metastasis on imaging. Current evidence to date is largely retrospective, but suggests that neoadjuvant therapy can increase R0 (pathologically negative margin) resection rates and improve overall survival. The standard approach to neoadjuvant treatment involves choosing between the two most active combination regimens for metastatic disease, namely modified FOLFIRNOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Nonrandomized data indicate that these regimens can yield resection rates up to 68% and 36%, in borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC, respectively. Furthermore, randomized data in patients with resectable PDAC treated with gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant therapy suggests that despite an approximate 10% drop in resection rates, there is a significant improvement in median overall survival. Herein, we will discuss the rationale for neoadjuvant therapy, current and former treatment regimens, common issues faced by clinicians when using these combinations, and several ongoing clinical trials.     

Can local ablative techniques replace surgery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer?

In the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) the best chance at long term survival or cure has to date always included the complete surgical removal of the tumor. However, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), about 25% of all newly diagnosed PDAC, is defined by its primary technical unresectability due to infiltration of visceral arteries and absence of metastasis. Induction therapies, especially FOLFIRINOX treatment, together with technical surgical advancement have increased the numbers for conversion to secondary resectability. Recent data on resections after induction therapy show promising, almost doubled survival compared to palliative treatment. Yet, around 70% of LAPC remain unresectable after induction therapy, often due to persistent local invasion. As locally ablative techniques are becoming more widely available this review examines their possible applicability to substitute for surgery in these cases which we propose to group under the new term “Inconvertible LAPC”. The need for defining this novel subgroup who might benefit from ablative treatment is based on the findings in our review that high-level evidence on ablative techniques for PDAC is largely lacking and the latest effective, harmonized treatment guidelines for LAPC are not often incorporated in these studies. The “inconvertible LAPC” label requires persistent unresectability after staging and induction therapy of LAPC according to current guidelines followed by liberal indication for aggressive surgical exploration at a center equipped for extended pancreatic resections. Ideally, this specification of a new, distinct patient group will also put it in the spotlight more, hopefully prompt more trials designed to generate robust evidence and optimize transferability of study results.     

Role of neoadjuvant therapy for nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer: Current evidence and future perspectives

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most common and lethal human cancers worldwide. Surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy offers the best chance of a long-term survival for patients with PDAC, although only approximately 20% of the patients have resectable tumors when diagnosed. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is recommended for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Several studies have investigated the role of NACT in treating resectable tumors based on the recent advances in PDAC biology, as NACT provides the potential benefit of selecting patients with favorable tumor biology and controls potential micro-metastases in high-risk patients with resectable PDAC. In such challenging cases, new potential tools, such as ct-DNA and molecular targeted therapy, are emerging as novel therapeutic options that may improve old paradigms. This review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of NACT in treating non-metastatic pancreatic cancer while focusing on future perspectives in light of recent evidence.     

Perioperative treatment options in resectable pancreatic cancer - how to improve long-term survival

Surgery remains the only chance of cure for pancreatic cancer, but only 15%-25% of patients present with resectable disease at the time of primary diagnosis. Important goals in clinical research must therefore be to allow early detection with suitable diagnostic procedures, to further broaden operation techniques and to determine the most effective perioperative treatment of either chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. More extensive operations involving extended pancreatectomy, portal vein resection and pancreatic resection in resectable pancreatic cancer with limited liver metastasis, performed in specialized centers seem to be the surgical procedures with a possible impact on survival. After many years of stagnation in pharmacological clinical research on advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) - since the approval of gemcitabine in 1997 - more effective cytotoxic substances (nab-paclitaxel) and combinations (FOLFIRINOX) are now available for perioperative treatment. Additionally, therapies with a broader mechanism of action are emerging (stroma depletion, immunotherapy, anti-inflammation), raising hopes for more effective adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment concepts, especially in the context of “borderline resectability”. Only multidisciplinary approaches including radiology, surgery, medical and radiation oncology as the backbones of the treatment of potentially resectable PDAC may be able to further improve the rate of cure in the future.     

Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. A Single Center Experience.

The management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a major challenge. Although new drugs are available for the treatment of metastatic disease, the optimal treatment of non-metastatic cases remains controversial. The role of neoadjuvant therapy is still a question of debate in this setting. The aim of the study was to prospectively collect and analyse data on efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen in LAPC patients treated in a single institution. Another major objective was to assess the capability of FOLFIRINOX to render primary non-resectable cancer to resectable. No bolus fluorouracil was given and a 20% dose reduction of oxaliplatin and irinotecan was applied. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis was applied to prevent febrile neutropenia. Thirty-two patients (mean age 60.2 years, range: 40–77 years) have been enrolled into the study. All patients had ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Best response to therapy was stable disease (SD) or partial regression (PR) in 18 (56.2%) and 6 (18.8%) cases. Two patients (6.3%) underwent surgical resection (100% R0). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were nausea (18.8%), fatigue (12.5%) and diarrhea (12.5%). The incidence of severe neutropenia was 28.1%, with only one documented case of febrile neutropenia. The probability of disease progression was 25% and 50% after 75 and 160 days with 88.4% of possibility of disease progression after 500 days. OS probability was 92.1, 71.5% and 49.5% at 180-, 365 and 540 days. Our data does not support the capability of FOLFIRINOX to render primary non-resectable cancer to resectable. However, due to the high disease control rate observed, FOLFRINOX might be recommended as first line option for the palliative treatment of LAPC. Despite reduced chemotherapy doses significant toxicity has been seen.     

Clinical challenges associated with utility of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an increasingly common cancer with a persistently poor prognosis, and only approximately 20% of patients are clearly anatomically resectable at diagnosis. Historically, a paucity of effective therapy made it inappropriate to forego the traditional gold standard of upfront surgery in favour of neoadjuvant treatment; however, modern combination chemotherapy regimens have made neoadjuvant therapy increasingly viable. As its use has expanded, the rationale for neoadjuvant therapy has evolved from one of ‘downstaging' to one of early treatment of micro-metastases and selection of patients with favourable tumour biology for resection. Defining resectability in PDAC is problematic; multiple differing definitions exist. Multidisciplinary input, both in initial assessment of resectability and in supervision of multimodality therapy, is therefore advised. European and North American guidelines recommend the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in borderline resectable (BR)-PDAC. Similar regimens may be applied in locally advanced (LA)-PDAC with the aim of improving potential access to curative-intent resection, but appropriate patient selection is key due to significant rates of recurrence after excision of LA disease. Upfront surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy remain standard-of-care in clearly resectable PDAC, but multiple trials evaluating the use of neoadjuvant therapy in this and other localised settings are ongoing.     

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy using gemcitabine for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patients with impaired renal function

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can be a promising treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, its administration for patients with impaired renal function has not been well investigated, let alone its clinical effect. We previously reported preliminary feasibility of CRT in PDAC patients with renal impairment. Herein, we aimed to investigate the clinical effects of preoperative CRT including safety and long-term prognosis in more PDAC patients with renal impairment as an extension to our previous work. This study enrolled twenty patients harboring resectable PDAC with creatinine clearance level less than 60 ml/min. Patients underwent preoperative CRT with gemcitabine, followed by surgery. The clinical effects of the therapy were evaluated in terms of safety and long-term prognosis. Preoperative CRT was completed in all 20 patients. Grade 4 leukopenia/neutropenia was identified as an observed toxicity in four cases (20.0%). Renal function was not worsened after CRT. After CRT, 17 cases were judged resectable and underwent laparotomy. Pancreatic resection was performed in 15 of the 17 patients; it was not performed in two patients because of peritoneal dissemination. The 1-/3-/5-year cumulative survival rate from the initiation of CRT for the 20 patients was 88.8%/45.5%/22.8%. In the 15 patients, renal function was not worsened after surgery. Our findings suggest that the clinical effects of preoperative CRT would be favorable in PDAC patients with renal impairment.     

Time to CA19-9 nadir: a clue for defining optimal treatment duration in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology - Defining optimal treatment duration in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) receiving primary chemotherapy is an unmet need. The...     

Induction gemcitabine and oxaliplatin therapy followed by a twice‐weekly infusion of gemcitabine and concurrent external‐beam radiation for neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND:

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may render curative resection feasible in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). The authors previously demonstrated the achievement of significant disease control and a median survival of 14 months by CRT in patients with LAPC. In this study, they evaluated the use of induction chemotherapy followed by a CRT neoadjuvant protocol.

METHODS:

Patients first received induction gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², oxaliplatin 100 mg/m²). Patients without disease progression then received gemcitabine twice weekly (50 mg/m² daily) concurrent with radiotherapy (50.4 grays) and were re‐evaluated for resectability.

RESULTS:

Thirty‐nine patients (15 with borderline resectable disease and 24 with unresectable disease) entered the study. The treatment was well tolerated. Disease control was obtained in 29 of 39 patients. Two patients progressed after GEMOX, and 7 progressed after CRT. After a median follow‐up of 13 months, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months. The median PFS of patients with borderline resectable and unresectable disease was 16.6 and 9.1 months, respectively (P = .056). For the whole group, the median overall survival (OS) was 16.7 months (27.8 months for patients with borderline resectable disease, 13.3 for patients with unresectable disease; P = .045). Eleven patients (9 with borderline resectable disease and 2 with unresectable disease at diagnosis) underwent successful resection. Patients who underwent resection had a significantly longer median PFS compared with nonresected patients (19.7 months vs 7.6 months, respectively). The median OS among resected and nonresected patients was 31.5 months and 12.3 months, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results indicated that induction GEMOX followed by CRT is feasible in patients with LAPC. Both those with borderline resectable disease and those with unresectable disease received clinical benefit, a chance to obtain resectability, and improved survival. The authors concluded that this protocol warrants further evaluation. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of resectable acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas-propensity score matching analysis with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundSurgical resection is recommended for patients with resectable acinar cell carcinoma (ACC). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of resectable ACC in comparison to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).MethodA retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who consecutively underwent radical resection with pathologically confirmed ACC and PDAC from December 2011 to December 2018. Clinicopathologic characteristics and follow-up information were analyzed. A 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to minimize the bias between ACC and PDAC.ResultsA total of 26 patients with ACC and 1351 with PDAC were included. Compared to PDAC, ACC tended to be larger (4.5 vs. 3.0 cm; p < 0.001) and more frequently located in the pancreatic body/tail (61.5% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.009), with lower total bilirubin levels, lower neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels and lower carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. There was no difference in postoperative morbidities in patients with ACC and PDAC. The median OS and RFS were longer in ACC when compared to PDAC (OS: 43.5 mo vs. 19.0 mo, p = 0.004; RFS: 24.5 mo vs. 11.6 mo, p = 0.023). After the 1:3 PSM, ACC remained to be a better histological type for OS (p = 0.024), but had comparable RFS with PDAC (p = 0.164).ConclusionPatients with ACC after radical resection had better OS than that with PDAC. However, ACC is also an aggressive tumor with a similar trend of RFS with PDAC after the matching, necessitating the multidisciplinary treatment for resectable ACC disease.     

Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) constitutes approximately one-third of all pancreatic cancer, with standard of care inconsistently defined and achieving modest outcomes at best. While resection after downstaging offers the chance for cure, only a fraction of patients with LAPC become candidates for resection. Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for the remainder. In these patients, ablative therapy may be given for local control of the tumor. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an attractive ablative technique. IRE changes the permeability of tumor cell membranes to induce apoptosis. Unlike other ablative therapies, IRE causes little thermal injury to the target area, making it ideal for LAPC involving major vessels. Compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, IRE seems to offer some survival benefit. Although early studies reported notable morbidity and mortality rates, IRE presents opportunities for those who cannot undergo resection and who otherwise have limited options. Another role of IRE is to extend the margins of resected tumors when there is a concern for R1 resection. Perhaps most exciting, IRE is thought to have effects beyond local ablation. IRE has immunomodulatory effects, which may induce in vivo vaccination and may potentially synergize with immunotherapy. Through electrochemotherapy, IRE may enhance drug delivery to residual tumor cells. Ultimately the role of IRE in the treatment of LAPC still needs to be validated through well designed randomized trials. Investigations of its future possibilities are in the early stages. IRE offers the potential to provide more options to LAPC patients.     

Role of Surgery and Perioperative Therapy in Older Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Background

It is unclear whether results from recent trials of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are generalizable to older patients, who are underrepresented. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of surgery and of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in older patients with resectable PDAC.

Patients and Methods

We included patients aged ≥65 years with upfront resectable PDAC from a prospectively maintained pancreatic cancer registry from 2007 to 2016. Patients were stratified into ages 65–75 and 75+ years. Overall survival (OS) was assessed in treatment comparisons: (A) surgery (n = 636) versus nonsurgical (n = 178), (B) neoadjuvant therapy (n = 139) versus upfront surgery (n = 497), and (C) adjuvant therapy (n = 379) versus surgery alone (n = 118). We compared neoadjuvant (n = 139) versus adjuvant therapy (n = 379) in an exploratory analysis.

Results

Nine hundred and three patients had a median age of 73.7 (range, 65–96.6) years. Median OS was 26.6 versus 11.9 months (adjusted hazard ratio [HR_adj], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31–0.52; p < .001) in Comparison A groups, 30.7 versus 25.8 months (HR_adj, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49–0.96; p = .03) in Comparison B groups, and 26.9 versus 17.4 months (HR_adj, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44–0.88; p = .008) in Comparison C groups, respectively. OS benefit in these treatment comparisons was present in age group 75+ with HR_adj 0.24 (95% CI, 0.16–0.36; p < .001) in Comparison A and HR_adj 0.52 (95% CI, 0.27–1; p = .049) in Comparison B, but not in Comparison C with HR_adj 0.68 (95% CI, 0.43–1.08; p = .1). Statistically comparable median OS of patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy stratified by age groups was observed.

Conclusion

Older patients with resectable PDAC who received surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, or adjuvant therapy appeared to have improved survival outcomes compared with those who did not receive such treatment.

Implications for Practice

Older patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in general are underrepresented in large clinical trials and less well studied in terms of the role of surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy. This study collected data on older patients with resectable PDAC from a prospectively maintained single-institutional pancreatic cancer registry of a tertiary referral center from 2007 to 2016. It was found that, with multidisciplinary evaluation, older patients with resectable PDAC who received surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, or adjuvant therapy appeared to have improved survival outcomes compared with those who did not receive such treatment. These results are of substantial importance to practitioners who treat older patients, who are traditionally underrepresented in most clinical trials.

     

糖尿病是可切除胰腺导管腺癌的预后因子

  目的   探讨合并2型糖尿病与胰腺导管腺癌（pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,PDAC）患者的临床病理因素及其与预后的关系。   方法   回顾性分析2009年1月至2011年2月可手术切除PDAC患者的临床病理资料,进行生存分析。   结果   136例PDAC患者中合并糖尿病的比率为27.9%,糖尿病与各临床病理特征均无关（均P>0.05）。单因素分析显示:糖尿病、肿瘤最大直径、组织学分化程度、pT分期、脉管侵润及pTNM分期,均与PDAC患者预后显著相关（均P < 0.05）。多因素分析显示:合并糖尿病（HR,1.873;P=0.007）,组织学低分化肿瘤（HR=2.647;P=0.002）及肿瘤最大直径≥4.0 cm（HR=1.699;P=0.018）,均是独立预后因子。   结论   合并糖尿病是可手术切除的PDAC患者预后差的独立预测因子。