Eosinophilia as an early indicator of pancreatic allograft rejection

Monitoring pancreas transplant recipients for rejection is an inexact science. Serial monitoring of urinary amylase has been used for patients with a bladder-drained pancreas. An increase in serum amylase and lipase has been utilized as an in vivo measure of pancreas rejection in patients with enteric pancreatic exocrine drainage. Decreases in urinary amylase or increases in serum amylase or lipase, respectively, in these two different types of surgical drainage would prompt a pancreas biopsy for histologic confirmation of rejection. Herein, we describe the case of an enteric-drained pancreatic transplant recipient who presented with peripheral eosinophilia at least one month before she developed increases in serum amylase and lipase. A pancreas allograft biopsy indicated eosinophilic acute cellular rejection. Peripheral eosinophilia may be a useful early indicator of pancreas graft rejection preceding changes in serum pancreatic enzymes by approximately one month.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy--biopsy findings and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a composite term for various types of damage to a kidney transplant. We wanted to analyse its components in relation to baseline biopsy findings, transplant function, and outcome. METHODS: Among renal transplantations performed from 1985 to 1997, 156 were identified where allograft biopsies had been obtained on clinical indication 6 months after transplantation or later, baseline biopsies were available in each case and the patient's original disease was known. Time after transplantation was median 2.2 years (range 0.5-13). The biopsies were reviewed and the Banff 1997 CAN score obtained. RESULTS: All but one late biopsy showed some CAN grade, 48% grade II, and 7.5% grade III. Acute tubulointerstitial rejection was seen in 9% but vascular rejection in only 3%. Arterial wall thickening was present in 66% of the late biopsies, correlated with donor age and its presence at baseline but also with time after transplantation. The Banff CAN score and serum creatinine level were both independent predictors of further graft survival, relative risk 0.35 (confidence interval 0.15-0.82, P=0.015) for CAN grade I vs III and 0.30 (0.14-0.67, P=0.003) for serum creatinine <170 vs >250 micromol/l. Presence of arterial wall thickening had no prognostic impact. CONCLUSION: The CAN grade is predictive of further graft survival independently of the serum creatinine level. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are more prominent features of chronic graft damage than vascular rejection. Unspecific arterial wall thickening is partly dependent on baseline conditions and lacks prognostic impact in this late stage.     

猪胰腺十二指肠移植后急性排斥反应的病理变化特点

目的 研究猪胰腺十二指肠移植术后胰腺和十二指肠粘膜急性排斥反应的病理变化特点及它们之间的关系。方法 １２头猪作同种异体胰腺十二指肠移植，平均分为未用药组和治疗组，术后定期取胰腺和十二指肠粘膜作普通病理检查。结果 胰腺急性排斥反应时首先并持续损伤腺泡，以后累及胰腺导管，最后为胰管和血管     

Concurrent biopsies of both grafts in recipients of simultaneous pancreas and kidney demonstrate high rates of discordance for rejection as well as discordance in type of rejection – a retrospective study

It is commonly assumed that in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) recipients, rejection of the two organs is concordant. As a result, concurrent biopsies of both organs are rarely performed and there are limited histological data on how often rejection is in fact discordant. We reviewed all SPK recipients transplanted at the University of Wisconsin between January 01, 2001, and December 31, 2016, that underwent biopsy of both organs. We included all patients whose biopsies were within 30 days. If patients were treated for rejection between biopsies, they were excluded if the biopsies were more than 4 days apart. Ninety‐one simultaneous biopsies were performed within 30 days of each other, and 40 met our inclusion criteria. A total of 25 (62.5%) patients had concordance of biopsy findings: 11 had rejection of both organs, and 14 had no rejection of either organ. The other 15 (37.5%) were discordant for rejection, with 10 having pancreas‐only rejection and five kidney‐only rejection. It was striking to find that four of the 11 patients with concordance for rejection (36%) had different types (AMR, ACR, or mixed) of rejection in the two organs. This large series of simultaneous pancreas and kidney biopsies demonstrates the continued utility of performing biopsies of both organs.     

Pancreas-specific protein (PASP), serum amyloid A (SAA), and neopterin (NEOP) in the diagnosis of rejection after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

A reliable, noninvasive indicator of pancreatic allograft rejection is urgently needed. In this study, serum (S), plasma (P), and urine (U) levels of pancreas-specific protein (P-PASP, U-PASP), neopterin (S-NEOP, U-NEOP), amylase (U-AMYL), and amyloid A (SAA) were measured daily in ten type I diabetic patients following simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK). Rejection episodes occurred in three isolated pancreas, nine isolated kidney, and five simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants. In the case of the eight pancreas rejections, SAA was the rejection marker with the highest diagnostic accuracy (94 %). Using P-PASP and U-PASP, an accuracy of 81 % and 79 %, respectively, was achieved. During viral infections, U-NEOP levels increased to a maximum level of 1904 μmol/mol creatinine, whereas during bacterial infections, SAA levels increased to a maximum value of 43 mg/dl. SAA, measured for the first time in SPK, appears to be a valuable rejection parameter. In combination with U-NEOP and U-AMYL, a differential diagnosis between rejection, bacterial infection, and viral infection was possible. Neither U-PASP nor P-PASP monitoring led to a significant improvement in the results. Received: 23 July 1996 Received after revision: 31 December 1996 Accepted: 3 January 1997     

Effect of the surgical technique on long-term outcome of pancreas transplantation

To date there is no general consensus as to the best surgical technique for pancreas transplantation. Patients with a pancreas transplant functioning for 3 years or more were retrospectively investigated to compare three surgical techniques: segmental graft with duct obstruction (DO), whole graft with bladder drainage (BD), and whole graft with enteric drainage (ED). Several parameters were studied: patient and graft survival, rejection, long-term surgical and medical complications, and endocrine function. The best results in terms of graft survival and quality of metabolic control were obtained in the group that underwent whole graft transplantation with ED. At 3 years, overall pancreas graft survival was 65 % for ED, 60 % for BD, and 47 % for DO. This surgical method has become the preferred technique in our unit. Received: 9 October 1997 Received after revision: 29 January 1998 Accepted: 30 March 1998     

Anti-Hla donor-specific antibody monitoring in pancreas transplantation: Role of protocol biopsies

In kidney transplantation, de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) correlate with poor graft survival, and Consensus Guidelines recommend a protocol biopsy. In pancreas transplantation, DSA are also associated with poor graft outcomes; however, there are no recommendations on protocol biopsies. We started an antibody screening protocol on pancreas transplant patients at 0, 3, 6, 12 months, and yearly. Patients with DSA or high MFI non-DSA were considered for protocol biopsies of both organs. Results: 143 pancreas recipients were screened. 84 patients had negative antibodies throughout the study, 11 patients were found to have antibodies at graft dysfunction, and 48 patients had positive antibodies at screening without acute organ dysfunction (study group). Among the 30 non-DSA patients, 9 had protocol simultaneous pancreas and kidney biopsies performed with negative results in all of them. In contrast, among the 18 DSA patients, 15 had these biopsies performed, and 47% presented with subclinical rejection of the kidney, the pancreas, or both. In addition, some of the DSA patients without a protocol biopsy presented with rejection during the first 15 months of follow-up. Conclusion: We conclude that protocol biopsies of both grafts may play a role in the follow-up of pancreas transplant patients with de novo DSA appearance.     

Laparoscopic Biopsies in Pancreas Transplantation

As there is no precise laboratory test or imaging study for detection of pancreas allograft rejection, there is increasing interest in obtaining pancreas tissue for diagnosis. Pancreas allograft biopsies are most commonly performed percutaneously, transcystoscopically, or endoscopically, yet pancreas transplant surgeons often lack the skills to perform these types of biopsies. We have performed 160 laparoscopic pancreas biopsies in 95 patients. There were 146 simultaneous kidney–pancreas biopsies and 14 pancreas‐only biopsies due to pancreas alone, kidney loss, or extraperitoneal kidney. Biopsies were performed for graft dysfunction (89) or per protocol (71). In 13 cases, an additional laparoscopic procedure was performed at the same operation. The pancreas diagnostic tissue yield was 91.2%; however, the pancreas could not be visualized in eight cases (5%) and in 6 cases the tissue sample was nondiagnostic (3.8%). The kidney tissue yield was 98.6%. There were four patients with intraoperative complications requiring laparotomy (2.5%) with two additional postoperative complications. Half of all these complications were kidney related. There were no episodes of pancreatic enzyme leak and there were no graft losses related to the procedure. We conclude that laparoscopic kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies can be safely performed with very high tissue yields.     

Impact of Acute Rejection Episodes on Long-Term Graft Survival Following Simultaneous Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation

Although it is well established that acute rejection is one of the major risk factors for chronic graft loss following kidney transplantation, its effect on long-term graft survival following simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants (SKPTs) is less well known. We analyzed a large cohort of SKPTs and cadaver kidney transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing database during 1988-97, to determine the impact of acute rejection episodes on long-term kidney and pancreas graft survival. Only patients whose kidney and pancreas grafts had survived for at least 1 year were included. Other potential risk factors influencing long-term graft survival were included in the analysis. Of the 4251 SKPTs, 45% had no acute rejection, 36% had kidney only rejection, 3% had pancreas only rejection, and 16% had both kidney and pancreas rejection within the 1st year post transplant. The 5-year kidney and pancreas graft survival rates adjusted for other risk factors were 91% and 85%, respectively; for those with no acute rejection episodes, 88% and 84%, respectively; for those with kidney only rejection, 94% and 83%, respectively; for those with pancreas only rejection; and 86% and 78%, respectively, for those with both kidney and pancreas rejection. The relative risk (RR) of kidney graft failure was 1.32 when acute rejection involved the kidney graft only, while the RR was 1.53 when the rejection involved both organs. We conclude that acute rejection episodes have a negative impact on the long-term kidney graft survival in the SKPT population similar to that in the cadaver kidney transplant population. Patients who had acute rejection episodes of both kidney and pancreas have the worst long-term graft survival.     

Pancreas transplant rejection episodes are not revealed by biopsies of the donor duodenum in a prospective study with paired biopsies

The surgical technique with duodeno‐duodenal enteroanastomosis of pancreas transplants allows for representative endoscopic ultrasound‐guided needle biopsies of the donor duodenum and the pancreas graft. We assessed whether histological findings in transplanted donor duodenal biopsies can indicate rejection in the transplanted pancreas. Since September 2012, a duodeno‐duodenal enteroanastomosis has been the default technique for pancreas transplantations at our center. In 67 recipients we prospectively examined 113 endoscopic ultrasound‐guided procedures with representative biopsies from the duodenum grafts and the pancreas grafts (97 per protocol and 16 on indication). All graft biopsies were evaluated according to established rejection criteria. A total of 22 biopsy‐proven pancreas rejections were detected, with 2 matching duodenal biopsies showing rejection. This gives a sensitivity of 9% for detection of a pancreas rejection by duodenal biopsies. The other matching duodenal biopsies were either normal (n = 13) or indeterminate (n = 7). Rejection of the donor duodenum was found in only 6/113 biopsies, with 2 concurrent pancreas rejections. In conclusion, the donor duodenum is not a useful reporter organ for rejection in the pancreas graft.     

Antibody-Mediated Rejection of a Pancreas Allograft

The role of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in pancreas transplantation is poorly understood. Here, we report on a patient who developed AMR of his pancreas allograft after receiving a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant. Pre-operative enhanced cytotoxicity and flow cytometry T-cell crossmatches were negative; B-cell crossmatches were not performed as per institutional protocol. The patient's post-operative course was significant for elevated serum amylase levels and development of hyperglycemia approximately 1 month after transplantation. A pancreatic biopsy at this time showed no cellular infiltrate but strong immunofluorescent staining for C4d in the interacinar capillaries. Analysis of the patient's serum identified donor-specific HLA-DR alloantibodies. He received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), rituximab and plasmapheresis, and his pancreatic function normalized. We conclude that clinically significant AMR can develop in a pancreas allograft and recommend that pancreatic biopsies be assessed for C4d deposition if the patient has risk factors for AMR and/or the pathologic evidence for cell-mediated rejection is underwhelming.     

Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) after pancreas and pancreas–kidney transplantation

Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) requires specific diagnostic tools and treatment and is associated with lower graft survival. We prospectively screened C4d in pancreas (n = 35, in 27 patients) and kidney (n = 33, in 21 patients) for cause biopsies. Serum amylase and lipase, amylasuria, fasting blood glucose (FBG) and 2‐h capillary glucose (CG) were also analysed. We found that 27.3% of kidney biopsies and 43% of pancreatic biopsies showed C4d staining (66.7% and 53.3% diffuse in peritubular and interacinar capillaries respectively). Isolated exocrine dysfunction was the main indication for pancreas biopsy (54.3%) and was followed by both exocrine and endocrine dysfunctions (37.1%) and isolated endocrine dysfunction (8.6%). Laboratorial parameters were comparable between T‐cell mediated rejection and AMR: amylase 151.5 vs. 149 U/l (P = 0.075), lipase 1120 vs. 1288.5 U/l (P = 0.83), amylasuria variation 46.5 vs. 61% (P = 0.97), FBG 69 vs. 97 mg/dl (P = 0.20) and 2‐h CG maximum 149.5 vs. 197.5 mg/dl (P = 0.49) respectively. Amylasuria values after treatment correlated with pancreas allograft loss (P = 0.015). These data suggest that C4d staining should be routinely investigated when pancreas allograft dysfunction is present because of its high detection rate in cases of rejection.     

Allograft Rejection of Small Bowel Transplantation in Pigs

n = 9): nonimmunosuppressed recipients; (2) group 2 (n = 8): FK506-immunosuppressed recipients; (3) group 3 (n = 2): autotransplant controls; and (4) donors (n = 17). Orthotopic small bowel transplantations were performed with Thiry-Vella loops for daily biopsies. The survival rate of group 2 was significantly longer than that of group 1 (P < 0.05). One best survivor in group 2 was killed at postoperative day (POD) 365. Treatment by FK506 prevented rejection, but most of the pigs died of pneumonia. In group 1, rejection began on POD 3 and progressed to severe rejection rapidly within 7 days. In group 2, rejection began from POD 6 to POD 8, but either remained mild or spontaneously improved. The differences in the routine laboratory data and the tumor necrosis factor-α level were not evident between the groups. Histological studies of repeated graft biopsies are thus considered to be essential for detecting signs of graft rejection. (Received for publication on Mar. 26, 1997; accepted on Jan. 6, 1998)     

Pancreas transplantation in crossmatch-positive recipients

BACKGROUND: Prolonged cold preservation time can unfavorably affect outcome in pancreas transplantation. To reduce this ischemic time, cadaver pancreas grafts, in selected cases, are sometimes transplanted before crossmatch results are known. We report our experience with pancreas transplants in recipients with either current or historically positive T- or B-cell crossmatches. METHODS: Crossmatch-positive pancreas transplants were identified using a computerized database. T-cell crossmatches were performed using an antihuman-globulin-augmented complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test; B-cell crossmatches were performed using an extended incubation CDC test. All patients received anti-T-cell induction therapy and either cyclosporine (1987-1993) or tacrolimus-based (1994-2001) immunosuppression. More recent recipients (2000-2001) also received intravenous gamma globulin and postoperative plasmapheresis. RESULTS: Between October 1, 1987 and March 31, 2001, of a total of 1076 pancreas transplants performed, 59 (5.48%) were crossmatch-positive. Of these, 8 had a current T-cell-positive crossmatch and 15 had a current B-cell-positive crossmatch. One recipient was both current B- and T-positive, and the rest were past B- and/or T-cell positive. One-year pancreas graft survival for current T- and B-cell crossmatch-positive transplants was 63% and 67%, respectively. T- or B-cell crossmatch-negative transplants had a 1-yr survival of 70%. In the T-cell crossmatch-positive group, four grafts are still functioning (follow-up range, 2-12 yr), one patient died with a functioning graft at 4 months, and four grafts failed (one each from pancreatitis, infection, primary nonfunction, and vascular thrombosis). No grafts were lost to rejection. In the B-cell crossmatch-positive group, six grafts are still functioning (follow-up range, 2-11 yr) and nine have failed (four from chronic rejection, three from vascular thromboses, and two from pancreatitis). Crossmatch-positive cases were significantly more likely to be retransplants (70.8%) than crossmatch-negative cases (14.8%, p < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, crossmatch positivity did not affect pancreas graft outcome, whereas retransplants had a significant impact on outcome (relative risk 1.84, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: (: i) Pancreas transplants performed in the setting of a positive current crossmatch may have long-term function. (ii) With current immunosuppressive protocols, graft loss from hyperacute and acute rejection may be prevented in current crossmatch-positive pancreas transplants. Chronic rejection was only seen in B-cell crossmatch-positive cases. (iii) High rates of technical graft loss in crossmatch-positive cases may reflect a high frequency of retransplants in this group.     

Subclinical Rejection Associated with Chronic Allograft Nephropathy in Protocol Biopsies as a Risk Factor for Late Graft Loss

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in protocol biopsies is associated with graft loss while the association between subclinical rejection (SCR) and outcome has yielded contradictory results. We analyze the predictive value of SCR and/or CAN in protocol biopsies on death-censored graft survival. Since 1988, a protocol biopsy was done during the first 6 months in stable grafts with serum creatinine <300 micromol/L and proteinuria <1 g/day. Biopsies were evaluated according to Banff criteria. Borderline changes and acute rejection were grouped as SCR. CAN was defined as presence of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Mean follow-up was 91 +/- 46 months. Sufficient tissue was obtained in 435 transplants. Biopsies were classified as normal (n = 186), SCR (n = 74), CAN (n = 110) and SCR with CAN (n = 65). Presence of SCR with CAN was associated with old donors, percentage of panel reactive antibodies and presence of acute rejection before protocol biopsy. Cox regression analysis showed that SCR with CAN (relative risk [RR]: 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-3.12; p = 0.02) and hepatitis C virus (RR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.38-3.75; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of graft survival. In protocol biopsies, the detrimental effect of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy on long-term graft survival is modulated by SCR.     

The effect of histopathologic and clinical features on allograft survival in renal transplant patients with antibody-mediated rejection

Background: Antibody-mediated rejection is a frequent cause of graft failure; however, prognostic indications of this complication have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of histopathological and clinical features and to determine the effect of these findings on allograft survival in patients with AMR.

Methods: Fifty-two patients suffered from AMR (30 male; mean age 39?±?11 years) were included in the study. Data were investigated retrospectively and graft survival was analyzed. All transplant biopsies were evaluated according to Banff 2009 classification.

Results: Of the 52 cases, 45 were transplanted from living-donors. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed in the first 3-months after transplantation. Graft survival was 65% at 12 months and 54% at 36 months. Mean serum creatinine at time of biopsy was 3.8?±?3.6?mg/dL. Thirty-five of the 52 cases showed diffuse C4d positivity, 12 cases showed focal and 5 remained C4d negative. One of the patients died, 13 experienced graft loss and 38 survived with functioning grafts. Serum creatinine levels at time of biopsy were correlated with graft survival (p?=?.021: OR?=?1.10: 95 % CI?=?1.015–1.199). In terms of the impact of pathological findings; tubulitis (p=.007: OR?=?2.62: 95 % CI?=?1.301–5.276), intimal arteritis (p=.017: OR?=?2.85: 95% CI?=?1.205–6.744) and interstitial infiltration (p=.004: OR?=?3.37: 95% CI?=?1.465–7.752) were associated with graft survival.

Conclusions: Serum creatinine at time of biopsy, tubulitis, intimal arteritis and interstitial infiltration were significantly associated with graft survival. Antibody-mediated rejection is associated with reduced long-term graft survival.     

Roux-en-y venting jejunostomy in pancreatic transplantation: a novel approach to monitor rejection and prevent anastomotic leak

Introduction: Pancreatic transplantation (PTx) with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretion is more physiologic than bladder‐systemic (BS) drainage. With portal‐enteric (PE) PTx, the diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) requires a percutaneous biopsy. The roux‐en‐y (RNY) venting jejunostomy in patients with PEPTx offers a novel approach to monitor rejection and prevent anastomatic leaks.
Methods. From January 1996 to December 1998, we performed 17 simultaneous kidney/pancreas transplants (SKPTx). The initial 4 patients underwent BS drainage and the subsequent 13 patients underwent RNY venting jejunostomy with PE drainage. All patients were treated with quadruple therapy. There were 9 males, 14 patients were Caucasian with a mean age of 32 yr (range 30–54 yr), and a mean pre‐transplantation duration of diabetes of 25 yr. Six patients underwent endoscopic donor duodenal biopsy through the jejunostomy to rule out clinically suspected AR. Gastrograffin was inserted into the jejunostomy to examine the integrity of anastamosis when indicated. In 9 out of 13 patients, the venting jejunostomy was taken down 9–12 months post‐transplantation after allograft function was stable.
Results. Actual patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 100, 100 and 94%, respectively, after a mean follow‐up of 16 months. Renal allografts functioned immediately in 89% of patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 19 d. Four (23%) patients (2 with BS drainage and 2 with PE drainage) suffered an AR episode in the first month, and 4 (23%) patients had five AR from 3–36 months post‐transplantation. Other complications were post‐operative bleeding in 3 patients, wound infection in 2 patients and a proximal duodenal stump leak in 1 patient. In patients with clinical rejection, endoscopy through the venting jejunostomy showed inflamed, friable doudenal mucosa and doudenal biopsy findings were compatible with AR.
Conclusion. These preliminary results suggest that RNY venting jejunostomy with PE drainage can be used safely to diagnose and monitor pancreas AR and to diagnose and prevent anastamotic leaks. This technique will be even more useful to visualize transplanted duodenal mucosa, collect pancreatic secretions (amylase) for analysis and perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography if needed to obtain pancreatic biopsies.     

Graft dysfunction in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK): Results of concurrent kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants offer significant therapeutic advantages but present a diagnostic approach dilemma in the diagnosis of rejection. Because both organs are from the same donor, the kidney has been treated traditionally as the “sentinel” organ to biopsy, presumably representing the status of both allografts. Truly concurrent biopsy studies, however, are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We examined 101 concurrent biopsies from 70 patients with dysfunction in either or both organs. Results showed concurrent rejection in 23 of 57 (40%) of cases with rejection; 19 of 57 (33.5%) and 15 of 57 (26.5%) showed kidney or pancreas only rejection, respectively. The degree and type of rejection differed in the majority (13 of 23, 56.5%) of cases with concurrent rejection, with the pancreas more often showing higher rejection grade. Taking into account pancreas dysfunction, a positive kidney biopsy should correctly predict pancreas rejection in 86% of the instances. However, the lack of complete concordance between the 2 organs, the discrepancies in grade and type of rejection, and the tendency for higher rejection grades in concurrent or pancreas only rejections, all support the rationale for pancreas biopsies. The latter provide additional data on the overall status of the organ, as well as information on nonrejection‐related pathologies.     

Clinical experience with human anodal trypsinogen (HAT) for detection of pancreatic allograft rejection

Abstract To date one of the major dilemmas in clinical pancreas transplantation is the lack of a reliable indicator for pancreas rejection. In a consecutive series of 52 patients undergoing simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation with bladder drainage technique between October 1991 and December 1992 a new test using serial levels of serum human anodal trypsinogen (HAT) was evaluated for its efficacy to detect pancreas rejection. Postoperative baseline levels of HAT were compared to peak HAT values at time of rejection. HAT profiles at time of rejection were calculated and compared to profiles of urinary amylase, serum amylase, fasting blood sugar and serum creatinine. In this series one year patient survival was 97%, graft survival of the pancreas 86% and of the kidney 90%. In 71% of the patients at least one rejection episode occurred. At time of kidney-biopsy proven rejection with a concurrent serum creatinine rise a significant HAT lCvel rise to more than 1000 ng/ml was observed from baseline levels of 200 ng/ml ( P < 0.001) indicating kidney and pancreas rejection (73%). Urinary amylase levels decreased in the majority of rejection episodes at the same time from baseline levels to less than 20000 U/l. In 25% of the rejection episodes a significant serum creatinine rise was observed without a HAT rise or urinary amylase decrease indicating kidney-only rejection, while in 2% a urinary amylase decrease and simultaneous HAT also was observed with a negative kidney biopsy indicating pancreas-only rejection. We feel that increase in HAT levels significantly correlates with pancreas rejection. After SPK, determination of HAT is an additional helpful non-invasive test. In pancreas transplantation alone HAT can be a useful indicator to detect rejection and facilitate timing of a pancreas biopsy and initiation of antirejection treatment.     

Management of complications of simultaneous kidney–pancreas transplantation with temporary venting jejunostomy

Abstract: Background/Aims: The majority of simultaneous kidney–pancreas (SPK) transplants are being performed with portal-enteric drainage, which does not allow easy access to the donor pancreas. By adding a temporary venting jejunostomy (TVJ) we have been able to closely monitor patients for bleeding, anastomotic leak and rejection.
Methods: Retrospective chart review of 29 patients undergoing SPK with PE drainage from December 1996 to December 2001.
Results: Median follow-up was 32 months. Patient, kidney and pancreas graft survival were 93%, 90% and 93%, respectively. The most common early complications were wound infections and bleeding. No patient suffered vessel thrombosis. The most common late (greater than 3 months post-transplant) complication was gastro-intestinal bleeding. Adequate tissue was obtained for biopsy in 100% of patients with suspected pancreatic rejection. The TVJ allowed one patient to undergo donor pancreas ERCP that demonstrated the site of a pancreatic duct leak. Duodenal stump leak and anastomotic bleeding were diagnosed in one patient each via the TVJ. The median time to takedown of the TVJ was 14 months.
Conclusion: TVJ allows patients an easy method of graft surveillance, is well tolerated, and has an acceptable complication rate. The TVJ allows access to diagnose anastomotic leak, cauterize bleeding mucosa, perform ERCP and biopsy the pancreas allograft.