The prognostic importance of trauma scoring systems for morbidity in children with penetrating abdominal wounds: 17 years of experience

Background/Purpose: Risk factors that may independently predict morbidity in children with penetrating abdominal wounds (PAW) have not been elucidated fully. The aim of this study was to identify not only correlated risk factors for morbidity in children with PAW, but also to evaluate the independent predictive value of 3 different trauma scoring systems: the Injury Severity Score (ISS), the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI), and the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS). Methods: Between January 1983 and November 2000, 119 children (99 boys, 20 girls) presenting with PAW were reevaluated by an analysis of the relationship between overall morbidity and potential risk factors. Results: Wounds were caused by firearm trauma in 85 children and stabbing in 34. Univariate analysis found that age greater than 10 years, trauma mechanism, number of intraabdominal organs injured (NOI) greater than 2, presence of penetrating injury, and ISS and PATI score were associated with greater than 3-fold increased incidence of morbidity (P [lt ] .05). The relative risk of a postoperative septic complication was higher than 2 for the following risk factors: age greater than 10 years, shotgun injury, number of organs injured greater than 2, presence of colon injury, ISS greater than 15, and PATI score greater than 15. Multivariate analysis showed that only ISS (P = .02), and PATI score (P = .03) were independently significant in predicting morbidity. Conclusion: ISS and PATI score were the most important indicators found to be independently associated with morbidity.     

The influence of injury severity on complication rates after primary closure or colostomy for penetrating colon trauma.

The management of penetrating colon injury has been frequently debated in the literature, yet few reports have evaluated primary closure versus diverting colostomy in similarly injured patients. Diverting colostomy is the standard of care when mucosal penetration is present, but primary closure in civilian practice has generally had excellent results, although it has been restricted to less severely injured patients. Because the degree of injury may influence choice of treatment in modern practice, various indices of injury severity have been proposed for assessment of patients with penetrating colon trauma. As yet, however, there has been no cross-comparison of repair type versus injury severity. A retrospective study 76 patients who sustained penetrating colon trauma between January 1, 1979 and December 31, 1985 and who survived for at least 24 hours was conducted. Different preferences among attending surgeons and a more aggressive approach to the use of primary closure during the years of study led to an essentially random use of primary closure and diverting colostomy for moderate levels of colon injury, with mandatory colostomy reserved for the most serious injuries. Primary closure was performed in 37 patients (three having resection and anastomosis), and colostomy was performed in 39 patients. Severity of injury was evaluated by the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI), and the Flint Colon Injury Score. Complications and outcome were evaluated as a function of severity of injury, and primary closure and colostomy were compared. Demographic profiles of the two groups did not differ regarding age, sex, mechanism of injury, shock, or delay between injury and operation. The mortality rate was 2.6% for each group. Major morbidity, including septic complications, occurred in 11% of the patients of the primary closure group and in 49% of those of the colostomy group. When PATI was less than 25, the Flint score was less than or equal to 2, or when the ISS was less than 25, primary closure resulted in fewer complications than did colostomy. Of the injury severity indices examined, the PATI most reliably predicted complications and specifically identified patients who whose outcome would be good with primary repair. These results suggest that the use of primary closure should be expanded in civilian penetrating colon trauma and that, even with moderate degrees of colon injury, primary closure provides an outcome equivalent to that provided by colostomy. In addition, the predictive value of the PATI suggests that it should be included along with other injury severity indices in trauma data bases.     

The morbidity of penetrating colon injury

The purpose of this study is to define the current morbidity and mortality associated with penetrating colon injury and to determine the impact of management strategy on outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all penetrating colon injuries managed at a level I trauma center (1990-2000), n=186. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine the independent predictors for colostomy and morbidity following colon injury. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of the patients were managed with primary repair or anastomosis while 47% received a colostomy. Independent predictors of colostomy included gunshot wound (GSW), degree of peritoneal contamination, and location of injury. The complication rate for patients requiring a colostomy was 57% versus 42% for the primary repair group, P=0.01. When adjusted for injury severity and hypotension, the presence of a colostomy was not associated with a significant increase in the complication rate (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 0.9-3.25). Independent predictors for the development of intra-abdominal abscess were hypotension on admission (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1-5.8) and penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI) score >25 (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 2.0-8.9). The complication rate for colostomy takedown was 17%. CONCLUSION: Penetrating colon injury carries a high rate of infectious morbidity. The development of infectious complications is related to the injury severity and haemodynamic status of the patient, not the type of operation performed.     

Penetrating right colon trauma. The ever diminishing role for colostomy

Ninety consecutive patients with penetrating trauma to the right colon were analyzed. The severity of injury to the colon and other abdominal organs was quantified in each patient by the Colon Injury Score (CIS) and the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI). Sixty-five patients (72%) were managed definitively, i.e., by primary repair (46 patients) and by resection-ileocolic anastomosis (19 patients). There was no morbidity related to the colonic repair in these patients. Exteriorized repair was used selectively in eight patients and was successful in six (75%). Thirteen patients underwent loop colostomy and the mean CIS and PATI in this group were comparable to those in primary repair and exteriorized repair groups. Resection colostomy was performed in four patients with extensive colon and associated organ trauma (high CIS, PATI). The overall incidence of intra-abdominal abscess was 2.2 per cent (2 of 90 patients). The mortality was 4.4 per cent (4 of 90 patients) and none of the deaths was related to the management of the colon trauma. It is concluded that the majority of patients with penetrating right colon trauma can be treated effectively by primary repair or resection anastomosis. Exteriorized repair should be the preferred method whenever loop colostomy is considered. Colostomy should be used selectively in unstable patients who require colon resection.     

Penetrating abdominal vena cava injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The surgical management and outcome of abdominal vena cava (AVC) injuries is presented. STUDY DESIGN, PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective record review of patients with AVC injuries treated in the Trauma Unit at Groote Schuur Hospital between January 1999 and December 2003 was undertaken. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, surgical management, associated injuries, duration of hospital stay, complications and mortality were extracted from patient records. Patients with acute peritonitis and/or shock underwent emergency laparotomy. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with AVC injuries were identified. Gunshot wounds accounted for 45 (94%) injuries. The mean weighted revised trauma score, injury severity score (ISS) and penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI) were 6.3, 24 and 42, respectively. The AVC injury was infrarenal and suprarenal in 41 and seven patients, respectively. Thirty injuries were ligated. There were 15 deaths (31%). Significant differences between survivors and non-survivors included ISS, preoperative hypotension and blood transfusion requirements, whereas site of injury, PATI, and surgical management did not. CONCLUSION: Abdominal vena cava injuries are associated with a high mortality. Ligation of the AVC in critically ill patients is a feasible and life-saving option.     

Canadian Association of General Surgeons evidence based reviews in surgery. 12. Primary repair for penetrating colon injuries.

Objective: To determine if the treatment of penetrating colonic injury must include fecal diversion at or proximal to the injury, to avoid sepsis and mortality. Data source: Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE 1966–2001, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry and EMBASE. Study selection: Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of primary repair versus fecal diversion in the management of penetrating colon injuries; 5 studies were identified. Outcome measures: Operative mortality, total complications, total infectious complications, intra-abdominal infections, abdominal infections excluding dehiscence, and wound complications including and excluding dehiscence. Penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI) and length of stay were included when available. Results: PATI did not significantly differ between groups; neither did mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51–5.66). However, total complications (OR 0.28, CI 0.18–0.42), total infectious complications (OR 0.41, CI 0.27–0.63), intra-abdominal infections (OR 0.59, CI 0.38–0.94), abdominal infections excluding dehiscence (OR 0.52, CI 0.31–0.86) and wound complications including (OR 0.55, CI 0.34–0.89) and excluding dehiscence (OR 0.43, CI 0.25–0.76) all significantly favoured primary repair. Conclusions: Primary repair of penetrating colon injuries is as safe as fecal diversion and has a lower complication rate.     

Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients with abdominal gunshot wounds

Risk factors that may independently predict mortality and morbidity in patients with abdominal gunshot wounds have not been fully elucidated. We prospectively studied the effects of 12 potential risk factors on mortality and morbidity in 82 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds who required laparotomy. Univariate analysis of these factors revealed that shock on admission, presence of penetrating colon injury and number of intra-abdominal organs injured (NOI)>2 were associated with greater than threefold increased incidence of death (p<0.05). Penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI) score>15 was associated with twentyfold increased incidence of death (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that only PATI (P=0.001), number of postoperative complications per patient (N(comp)) (P=0.023) and presence of shock on admission (P=0. 028) were independently significant in predicting mortality. PATI was the only risk factor that independently predicted the development of postoperative infectious complications and N(comp) (P<0.0001). The type of gun used was not a significant risk factor (P>0.05). The 15 (18.3%) non-survivors were significantly older than survivors (P=0.02), had longer operations (P=0.004) and their NOI, PATI and N(comp) were significantly higher (P<0.001). The uniformly prolonged injury to surgery time in all patients contributed to the high incidence of infectious complications (62.2%) and mortality. PATI score was the most important factor found to be independently associated with mortality and morbidity in our subset of patients with prolonged injury to surgery time and high rate of colon injury.     

Delayed presentation of an isolated sigmoid Colon injury following blunt abdominal trauma: A case report with review of literature

Introduction and importanceIsolated Colon injury due to blunt abdominal trauma is very rare. Due to lack of a definitive diagnostic method; it's very challenging to detect such injury and this will lead to delay in treatment and subsequently resulting in high morbidity and mortality. The current literature is relatively sparse concerning the management of blunt colon injuries.Case presentationHere, we report a case of a 17-year-old male patient with isolated sigmoid injury presented 5 days after MVC. He underwent sigmoid resection and end colostomy followed by reversal 6 weeks later. Currently, the patient is disease-free with a completely healed wound.ConclusionThe purpose behind this paper is to raise clinical suspicion regarding delayed presentation of blunt abdominal trauma and it effect on operative decision, so that timely diagnosis and proper management could be carried out. And to discuss the applicability of the defined management algorithm for penetrating colon injury on delay blunts colonic injury.     

Penetrating colon trauma-the effect of concomitant small bowel injury on outcome

IntroductionThere is limited evidence to suggest that patients with penetrating colon injury have higher complication rates when there is concomitant small bowel (SB) injury.AimWe performed a retrospective study looking at outcomes of penetrating colonic trauma in patients with- and without concomitant SB injury.MethodsWe interrogated our electronic registry over an eight-year period (2012–2020) for all patients over 18 years who had sustained penetrating colon injury and who had survived beyond 72 h. Demographic data, admission physiology, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were recorded. Two groups of patients were observed: those with colonic injury (no SB injury) and those with combined colon and SB injury. Outcomes observed included leak rates, length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay (LOS), morbidity and mortality.ResultsA total of 450 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 257 had colon injury without SB injury and 193 had a combination of colon and SB injury. There was no difference in mechanism of injury between groups. Admission physiology was similar between groups but arterial blood gas values were worse in the combined group. Rates of damage control surgery and ICU admission were higher in the combined group. Primary repair was done in equal proportions between groups but anastomosis was more frequently performed in the combined group. There was no difference in complication rates, including gastro-intestinal complications and suture line leaks. Length of ICU stay, LOS, and mortality were similar between groups. Univariable analysis demonstrated that the presence of concomitant small bowel injury was not an independent risk factor for colonic suture line failure or death.ConclusionThere is no evidence from this data that the presence of a combined penetrating colon and SB injury should change management priorities. Each injury should be treated on its own merit, in the context of the patient's physiology.     

Management of penetrating pancreatic trauma: an 11-year experience of a level-1 trauma center

Introduction: We present our experience in the management of penetrating pancreatic injuries, focusing on factors related to complications and death.

Methods: Retrospective trauma registry-based analysis of 62 consecutive patients with penetrating pancreatic injuries during an 11-year period. Overall injury severity was assessed by the injury severity score (ISS) and the penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI). Pancreatic injuries were graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scaling (OIS). Complications were characterised using standardised definitions. Mortality was recorded as early (within 48 h after admission) and late (after 48 h).

Results: Thirty patients suffered gunshot wounds and 24 had grade I pancreatic injuries. Shotgun and gunshot wounds were more destructive than stab wounds (higher PATI, number of intraabdominal injuries and mortality). Seventeen patients died. Most deaths occurred within 1 h after admission due to massive bleeding and severe associated injuries. Only one death was potentially related to the pancreatic injury. Mortality rate also correlated with pancreatic injury grading. Sixty-one patients had associated intraabdominal injuries. Combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries were present in 13 patients, and five died. Simple drainage was the most common procedure performed. Pancreas-related complications were found in 12 out of 47 patients who survived more than 48 h; intraabdominal abscess (n=7) that was associated with colon injuries, and pancreatic fistula (n=5).

Conclusion: An approach based on injury grade and location is advised. Routine drainage is recommended; distal resection is indicated in the presence of main duct injury, and the management of severe injuries will be tailored according to the overall physiologic status, presence of associated injuries, and duodenal viability. Morbidity and mortality is mainly due to associated injuries.     

Independent Predictors of Treatment Modality for Penetrating Colon Injury

Abstract Background and Aims:   We aimed to evaluate the independent factors of the treatment of penetrating colon injuries in a teaching and research hospital in light of some of the most commonly cited considerations affecting the decision as to whether to perform primary repair or divert. Methods:   Hospital records of patients between January 2004 and January 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty-seven patients were included and divided into two groups. Group A consisted of patients (n = 43) who had primary repair or resection and anastomosis, and Group B consisted of patients (n = 14) who had diverting colostomy. The degree of fecal contamination was assessed by reviewing the detailed operative dictation. The type of colon injury, as determined from the colon injury scale (CIS) of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), and the penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI) were recorded. Results:   Age, sex, presence of shock on admission, location of the injury, and colon-related or non-colonrelated complications between the two groups were not significant. Stab or gunshot injury, operation time, degree of fecal contamination (grade 1/2/3), transfusion, PATI score, hospital stay, and associated organ injury were significantly different in the two groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion:   Despite the fact that CIS, fecal contamination, transfusion, PATI and delayed operation affect the decision about the procedure, primary repair can be performed safely on patients with penetrating colon injuries.     

Low incidence of penetrating trauma in a high-volume tertiary center: 10-year mortality review

Background

Trauma morbidity and mortality outcome is better in high-volume trauma centers. However, there are few publications investigating the experience of high-volume centers with high non-trauma emergency load but seeing a relatively low incidence of trauma. The objective of this study is to review the presentation and outcomes for the low volume of patients presenting with penetrating injuries in a high-volume hospital.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Singapore General Hospital database between 1998 and 2007. There were 1,233 patients who sustained penetrating injuries and were brought to the hospital during the 10-year period. Of these, only 78 patients had injury severity score (ISS) values of 16 or more. In the same period, there were 1,270 patients with ISS > 15 who were admitted with blunt injury. SPSS 10.1 was used to conduct univariate and multivariate analyses to elucidate risk factors for mortality.

Results

Age, ISS, and trauma injury severity score (TRISS) were significant predictors of mortality. Gender and type of injury were not predictive of mortality. Mortality outcomes were independently predicted by age, TRISS, and ISS. The most common site of injury was the chest, followed closely by the head and neck. The abdomen/pelvis was the third most common site of injury. There was no significant difference in anatomical site injury pattern between the survivors and non-survivors. For both groups, chest injuries and head and neck injuries dominated, with maximal abdominal/pelvic injuries a distant third.

Conclusion

With a trauma system in place, high-volume centers with a low volume of penetrating injury patients can still manage uncommon injuries without jeopardizing patient care.     

Penetrating duodenal injuries. Analysis of 100 consecutive cases.

One hundred consecutive patients with penetrating duodenal injuries were reviewed retrospectively to analyze the results of various methods of treatment. The severity of the abdominal injury was quantified by the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI). The overall mortality was 25%. Sixteen per cent of the deaths were related to extensive associated organ injury, eight per cent to sepsis, and one per cent to concurrent head trauma. Duodenal fistulas occurred in four per cent and were associated with mortality in two per cent. The complications of duodenal fistula, abdominal sepsis, and mortality from sepsis were significantly higher in those patients treated by repair and decompressive enterostomy with or without a serosal patch than in those with repair or resection. The severity of duodenal and associated organ injuries, as well as the clinical status, were similar in both groups. It is concluded that the majority of duodenal injuries from penetrating trauma may be treated effectively by primary repair, and that the use of decompressive enterostomy or serosal patch appears to contribute to an increased morbidity rate.     

The influence of the risk factor on the abdominal complications in colon injury management

Introduction

The management of colon injuries has distinctly evolved over the last three decades. However, trauma surgeons often find themselves in a dilemma, whether to perform a diversion or to perform a primary repair. The purpose of this study is to evaluate risk factors in colon injury management and their influence on abdominal complications.

Patients and methods

This is a prospective study conducted at a national level I trauma center in Tirana, Albania from January 2009 to December 2012. The data with respect to demographics, physiological risk factors, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures were collected. Colonic injury-related morbidity and mortality were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by assessing the influence of risk factors on abdominal complications.

Results

Of the 157 patients treated with colon injury, was performed a primary repair in 107 (68.15%) of the patients and a diversion in the remaining 50 (31.85%). The mean PATI was 18.6, while 37 (23.6%) of patients had PATI greater than 25. The complications and their frequencies according to the surgical technique used (primay repair vs diversion respectively) includes: wound infections (9.3% vs 50%), anastomotic leak (1.8% vs 8.7%), and intra-abdominal abscess (1.8% vs 6.5%). The multivariate analysis identified two independent risk factors for abdominal complications: transfusions of 4 units of blood within the first 24 hours (OR = 1.2 95% CI (1.03 –1.57) p =0.02), and diversion (OR = 9.6, 95% CI 4.4 – 21.3, p<0.001).

Conclusion

Blood transfusions of more than 4 units within the first 24 hours and diversion during the management of destructive colon injuries are both independent risk factors for abdominal complications. The socioeconomic impact and the need for a subsequent operation in colostomy patients are strong reasons to consider primary repair in the management of colon injuries.     

The changing epidemiology of spinal trauma: a 13-year review from a Level I trauma centre

IntroductionSpinal injuries secondary to trauma are a major cause of patient morbidity and a source of significant health care expenditure. Increases in traffic safety standards and improved health care resources may have changed the characteristics and incidence of spinal injury. The purpose of this study was to review a single metropolitan Level I trauma centre's experience to assess the changing characteristics and incidence of traumatic spinal injuries and spinal cord injuries (SCI) over a 13-year period.Patients and methodsA retrospective review of patients admitted to a Level I trauma centre between 1996 and 2008 was performed. Patients with spinal fractures and SCI were identified. Demographics, mechanism of injury, level of spinal injury and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were extracted. The outcomes assessed were the incidence rate of SCI and in-hospital mortality.ResultsOver the 13-year period, 5.8% of all trauma patients suffered spinal fractures, with 21.7% of patients with spinal injuries having SCI. Motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) were responsible for the majority of spinal injuries (32.6%). The mortality rate due to spinal injury decreased significantly over the study period despite a constant mean ISS. The incidence rate of SCI also decreased over the years, which was paralleled by a significant reduction in MVA associated SCI (from 23.5% in 1996 to 14.3% in 2001 to 6.7% in 2008). With increasing age there was an increase in spinal injuries; frequency of blunt SCI; and injuries at multiple spinal levels.ConclusionThis study demonstrated a reduction in mortality attributable to spinal injury. There has been a marked reduction in SCI due to MVAs, which may be related to improvements in motor vehicle safety and traffic regulations. The elderly population was more likely to suffer SCI, especially by blunt injury, and at multiple levels. Underlying reasons may be anatomical, physiological or mechanism related.     

Independent predictors of morbidity and mortality in blunt colon trauma

We sought to determine the impact of (1) grade of the colon injury, (2) the formation of an ostomy, and (3) associated injuries on outcomes such as morbidity and mortality after blunt colon injuries. We retrospectively reviewed 16,814 cases of blunt abdominal trauma. Patients with colonic injuries were selected and charts reviewed for demographic, clinical, and outcomes data. Injuries were grouped by the Colon Injury Scale (grades I-V). Independent risk factors of morbidity included spine and lung injuries, as well as increased age. A higher grade of colon injury trended toward a significant association with intra-abdominal complications. Independent risk factors of mortality included liver, heart, and lung injuries, as well as intracerebral blood and female gender. The grade of colon injury, the formation of an ostomy, and management of the colon trauma did not independently predict increased intra-abdominal complications, morbidity, or mortality. These results indicate that patients afflicted with blunt colon trauma experience a high rate of morbidity and mortality from associated injuries and or increased age. Treatment regimens directed at these factors will be most helpful in reducing the high morbidity and mortality after blunt colon trauma. Factors such as ostomy formation and management strategy are not associated with increased morbidity or mortality after blunt colon trauma.     

The Effect of Human-Immunodeficiency Virus Status on Outcomes in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: An Interim Analysis

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the outcomes of hemodynamically stable patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma differed as a result of their HIV status.

Methods

This was an observational, prospective study from February 2016 to May 2017. All hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma requiring a laparotomy were included. The mechanism of injury, the HIV status, age, the penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI), and the revised trauma score (RTS) were entered into a binary logistic regression model. Outcome parameters were in-hospital death, morbidity, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), relaparotomy within 30 days, and length of stay longer than 30 days.

Results

A total of 209 patients, 94% male, with a mean age of 29 ± 10 years were analysed. Twenty-eight patients (13%) were HIV positive. The two groups were comparable. Ten (4.8%) laparotomies were negative. There were two (0.96%) deaths, both in the HIV negative group. The complication rate was 34% (n = 72). Twenty-nine patients (14%) were admitted to the ICU. A higher PATI, older age, and a lower RTS were significant risk factors for ICU admission. After 30 days, 12 patients (5.7%) were still in hospital. Twenty-four patients (11%) underwent a second laparotomy. The PATI score was the single independent predictor for complications, relaparotomy, and hospital stay longer than 30 days.

Conclusions

Preliminary results reveal that HIV status does not influence outcomes in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.

     

Hospital management of abdominal trauma in Tehran, Iran: a review of 228 patients

Objective: Today, trauma is a major public health problem in some countries. Abdominal trauma is the source of significant mortality and morbidity with both blunt and penetrating injuries. We performed an epidemiological study of abdominal trauma (AT) in Tehran, Iran. We used all our sources to describe the epidemiology and outcome of patients with AT.Methods: This study was done in Tehran. The study population included trauma patients admitted to the emergency department of six general hospitals in Tehran during one year. The data were collected through a questionnaire that was completed by a trained physician at the trauma center. The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software (version 11.5 for Windows). The statistical analysis was conducted using the chi-square and P＜0.05 was accepted as being statistically significant.Results: Two hundred and twenty-eight (2.8%) out of 8 000 patients were referred to the above mentioned centers with abdominal trauma. One hundred and twenty-five (54.9%)of the patients were in their 2nd and 3rd decades of life and 189 (83%) of our patients were male. Road traffic accidents (RTA) were the leading cause of AT with 119 (52.2%) patients. Spleen was the commonly injured organ with 51 cases. Following the analysis of injury severity, 159 (69.7%) patients had mild injuries (ISS＜16) and 69 (30.3%) patients had severe injuries (ISS= 16). The overall mortality rate was 46 (20.2%).Conclusions: Blunt abdominal trauma is more common than penetrating abdominal trauma. Road traffic accidents and stab wound are the most common causes of blunt and penetrating trauma, respectively. Spleen is the most commonly injured organ in these patients. The mortality rate is higher in blunt trauma than penetrating one.     

Blunt Abdominal Trauma Requiring Laparotomy: an Analysis of 342 Polytraumatized Patients

Abstract Introduction: Hemorrhage due to abdominal trauma is one of the most frequent causes of early mortality in polytraumatized patients. Therefore, the initial management of abdominal trauma is an important factor in determining the outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical course in multiple trauma patients who sustained abdominal trauma requiring operative intervention. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective analysis, a database containing prospectively collected data on polytraumatized patients from a European level I trauma center was used. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) operative intervention for blunt abdominal injuries with positive intraoperative findings, (2) injury severity score (ISS) > 18, and (3) age 16–65 years. Results: The inclusion criteria were met by 342 patients (229 male and 113 female patients, mean ISS 39.9±8.9). The most frequently observed intra-abdominal injuries were to the spleen (62.1%) and the liver (47.7%). The most common extra-abdominal injury observed in combination with abdominal trauma was trauma to the chest (71.9%). One hundred forty-three patients (41%) died during their hospital stay. The most frequent reasons for death were hemorrhagic shock (26.7%), ARDS (27.6%) and head trauma (23.2%). The severity of liver injury correlated positively with mortality. In contrast, no correlation between splenic injuries and mortality was observed. Significantly more deaths were attributed to primarily extra-abdominal injuries (111 patients, 77.6%) and then to intra-abdominal injuries (12 patients, 8.4%). In 20 patients (14%), a combination of intra- and extra-abdominal injuries caused posttraumatic death. Conclusion: Mortality was significantly higher for extra-abdominal injuries and their associated complications compared to intra-abdominal injuries. These findings should be considered in the development of treatment algorithms for blunt trauma.     

Laparotomy for penetrating gastric trauma - A South African experience

IntroductionPenetrating gastric injury (PGI) is common and although primary repair is sufficient for most injuries, several areas surrounding the peri-operative management remain contentious. This study reviews our experience in the management of PGI and review the clinical outcome at a major trauma centre in South Africa.Materials and methodsA retrospective study was conducted from January 2012 to April 2020 at a major trauma centre in South Africa.Results210 cases were included (184 male, median age: 30 years). Mechanism of injury was 59% stab wounds (SWs) and 41% gunshot wounds (GSWs). The AAST grade was predominantly (92%) grade 2 for all cases. 20% (41/210) were isolated gastric injuries. All cases underwent primary repair and there were no cases of suture line failure. Eleven cases (5%) had one or more injuries not identified at the index laparotomy: 7 were unidentified gastric injuries and the remaining 4 were unidentified non gastric injuries. There was no association between unidentified injuries and mechanism of injury or outcome. Fifty-seven (27%) cases experienced one or more complications. Eighty-two cases (39%) required intensive care unit admission. The overall median length of hospital stay was 7 (IQR 4-11) days. The overall mortality was 14%. GSW injuries were more likely to have additional organ injury, higher ISS and PATI scores, longer length of hospitalization, higher likelihood of ICU stay, greater morbidity and mortality than SW injuries. There was a slight increase in the wound sepsis rate as number of associated extra gastric injuries increased but this was not statistically significant. There was no difference in wound overall sepsis rate between SW and GSW injuries (2% vs 8%, p=0.121).ConclusionsPrimary repair alone is sufficient for most PGI, but laparotomy is associated with high incidence of unidentified injury and surgeons must to be cognisant of the likelihood of these occult injuries.