Food allergy: When and how to perform oral food challenges

In many situations, the diagnosis of food allergy rests simply upon a history of an acute onset of typical symptoms, such as hives and wheezing, following the isolated ingestion of a suspected food, with confirmatory laboratory studies of positive prick skin tests or RASTs. However, the diagnosis is more complicated when multiple foods are implicated or when chronic diseases, such as asthma or atopic dermatitis, are evaluated. The diagnosis of food allergy and identification of the particular foods responsible is also more difficult when reactions are not mediated by IgE antibody, as is the case with a number of gastrointestinal food allergies. In these latter circumstances, well‐devised elimination diets followed by physician‐supervised oral food challenges are critical in the identification and proper treatment of these disorders. Since childhood food allergies to common allergenic foods such as milk, egg, wheat and soy are usually outgrown, oral food challenges are also an integral part of the long‐term management of these children.     

Fish allergy in childhood

Fish and its derived products play an important role in human nutrition, but they may also be a potent food allergen. Fish can be an ingested, contact, and inhalant allergen. Gad c I, a Parvalbumin, the major allergen in codfish, is considered as fish and amphibian pan‐allergen. Prevalence of fish allergy appears to depend on the amount of fish eaten in the local diet. In Europe, the highest consumption occurs in Scandinavian countries, Spain and Portugal. In Spain, fish is the third most frequent allergen in children under 2 yr of age after egg and cow’s milk. An adverse reaction to fish may be of non‐allergic origin, due to food contamination or newly formed toxic products, but the most frequent type of adverse reactions to fish are immunologic‐mediated reactions (allergic reactions). Such allergic reactions may be both IgE‐mediated and non‐IgE‐mediated. Most cases are IgE‐mediated, due to ingestion or contact with fish or as a result of inhalation of cooking vapors. Some children develop non‐IgE‐mediated type allergies such as food protein induced enterocolitis syndrome. The clinical symptoms related to IgE‐mediated fish allergy are most frequently acute urticaria and angioedema as well as mild oral symptoms, worsening of atopic dermatitis, respiratory symptoms such as rhinitis or asthma, and gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. Anaphylaxis may also occur. Among all the species studied, those from the Tunidae and Xiphiidae families appear to be the least allergenic.     

Fish and shellfish allergy in children: Review of a persistent food allergy

The increased consumption of fish and shellfish has resulted in more frequent reports of adverse reactions to seafood, emphasizing the need for more specific diagnosis and treatment of this condition and exploring reasons for the persistence of this allergy. This review discusses interesting and new findings in the area of fish and shellfish allergy. New allergens and important potential cross‐reacting allergens have been identified within the fish family and between shellfish, arachnids, and insects. The diagnostic approach may require prick to‐prick tests using crude extracts of both raw and cooked forms of seafood for screening seafood sensitization before a food challenge or where food challenge is not feasible. Allergen‐specific immunotherapy can be important; mutated less allergenic seafood proteins have been developed for this purpose. The persistence of allergy because of seafood proteins’ resistance after rigorous treatment like cooking and extreme pH is well documented. Additionally, IgE antibodies from individuals with persistent allergy may be directed against different epitopes than those in patients with transient allergy. For a topic as important as this one, new areas of technological developments will likely have a significant impact, to provide more accurate methods of diagnosing useful information to patients about the likely course of their seafood allergy over the course of their childhood and beyond.     

Frequency of food allergy in a pediatric population from Spain

We evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of the principal foods implicated in 355 children diagnosed with IgE-mediated food allergy. Diagnosis was established on the basis of positive clinical history for the offending food, positive specific IgE by skin prick test and RAST, and open food challenge. Our results showed the principal foods involved in allergic reactions are: eggs, fish, and cow's milk. These are followed in frequency by fruits (peaches, hazelnuts and walnuts), legumes (lentils, peanuts and chick peas) and other vegetables (mainly sunflower seeds). The legumes demonstrated the highest degree of clinical cross-reactivity. Most patients with food allergy reacted to one or two foods (86.7%). Only 13.3% of patients reacted to 3 or more foods, mostly to legumes and fruits. We found that food allergy begins most frequently in the first (48.8%) and second (20.4%) years of life. Allergy to proteins of cow's milk, egg, and fish begins predominantly before the second year, demonstrating a clear relationship with the introduction of these foods into the child's diet. Allergy to foods of vegetable origin (fruits, legumes and other vegetables) begins predominantly after the second year.;     

Tree nut introduction in a peanut-allergic child: To eat,to screen,or to avoid?

There is no defined standard of care around tree nut introduction in a peanut-allergic child, and the role of screening prior to tree nut introduction is controversial. There is some evidence that peanut-allergic children are at increased risk of tree nut allergy, with approximately 23–68% of children with co-existent peanut/tree nut allergy. In some studies, it has been shown that tree nut allergy in children has the potential to be a severe allergy. However, this appears to be age-specific as infant anaphylaxis in general tends to be milder, and there has been no fatality reported on the first ingestion of an allergen in infancy. Familial hesitancy has been identified as a possible condition for undertaking screening tests prior to allergen introduction. Indeed, there has been limited evidence that caregiver hesitancy may exist in peanut-allergic families with tree nut introduction. However, pre-emptive screening has the potential to overdiagnose tree nut allergy and delay introduction (which could paradoxically increase risk). As a result, the decision is best made in the context of shared decision-making and patient preference-sensitive care.     

The spectrum of cow''s milk allergy

Childhood cow's milk allergy is a diagnosis encompassing various syndromes. Antigen-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody interaction is classically involved in mast cell degranulation in IgE-mediated food allergy, while non-IgE mediated cow's milk allergy is mostly mediated by cellular mechanisms. The diagnosis of cow's milk allergy largely relies on a good knowledge of the clinical expression of the disease. In this educational review series, we describe three cases of cow's milk allergy, first a 7-yr-old girl with persisting IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy, second a 8-month-old boy with cow's milk induced flares of atopic dermatitis, and third a 6-yr-old boy with sheep and goat milk allergy, in the absence of cow's milk allergy. The cases are discussed and summarized with more general recommendations for the clinical management of cow's milk allergy.     

Food-induced fatal anaphylaxis in adults: respiratory death

Fatal food-induced anaphylaxis is rarely reported, and its incidence is unknown. We have identified six adults who experienced fatal postprandial anaphylaxis. Four were highly atopic, and all had experienced prior non-fatal reactions to peanut, pecan, codfish, or shellfish. In five of six cases, the fatal reaction occurred after dining away from home. All victims had elevated serum IgE antibodies to the incriminated food, and in four cases the mast cell tryptase levels were also elevated. IgE-antibody containing sera from victims could be used in inhibition immunoassays to test for hidden food allergens in uneaten portions of foods consumed just prior to death. Most fatal anaphylactic reactions to foods are preventable. Sensitized persons may be lulled into false security by the reversibility of previous reactions; may not appreciate possible inadvertent contamination of non-allergenic foods by allergenic foods; may not appreciate the gravity of symptoms if intoxicated; and may attempt to deny symptoms or treat themselves inappropriately with antihistamines rather than with epinephrine. Patient education efforts should be directed to these areas.     

Early intervention for the prevention of atopic dermatitis

Based on a lecture given to the European Society for Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
Diseases associated with atopy are increasing throughout the world. Individuals appear to have a genetic predisposition to atopy which is then provoked by environmental influences. Ingested or inhaled allergens provoke an antibody response and a state of sensitization. In many but not all sensitized individuals subsequent exposure to allergen will provoke a release of histamine and other mediators from sensitized mast cells and produce clinical signs of an allergic reaction in the target organ or throughout the body. At the present time one approach to the prevention or reduction of such reactions appears to be the identification of the high-risk infant and then preventing or limiting exposure to the potentially allergenic protein materials in the child's diet or immediate environment.
This paper outlines the problems of identifying high-risk infants and comments on the success claimed in the intervention studies that have been undertaken. The possible hazards to mothers and infants of dietary exclusion are emphasized and the provision of appropriate medical and dietetic support are regarded as of paramount importance. Although more studies are needed, the Isle of Wight intervention programme offers hope to families at high-risk of atopy that the problem can be reduced for the next generation.     

Early introduction of allergenic foods for the prevention of food allergy from an Asian perspective—An Asia Pacific Association of Pediatric Allergy,Respirology & Immunology (APAPARI) consensus statement

Emerging evidence for the early introduction of allergenic foods for the prevention of food allergies, such as peanut allergy in Western populations, has led to the recent publication of guidelines in the USA and Europe recommending early peanut introduction for high‐risk infants with severe eczema or egg allergy. Peanut allergy is, however, much less prevalent in Asia compared to the West. Varying patterns of food allergy are seen even within Asian countries—such as a predominance of wheat allergy in Japan and Thailand and shellfish allergy in Singapore and the Philippines. Customs and traditions, such as diet and infant feeding practices, also differ between Asian populations. Hence, there are unique challenges in adapting guidelines on early allergenic food introduction to the Asian setting. In this paper, we review the evidence and discuss the possible approaches to guide the timely introduction of allergenic food in high‐risk infants in Asia.     

Food hypersensitivity in two groups of children and young adults with atopic dermatitis evaluated a decade apart

There is an impression that children today are experiencing allergic reactions to an increasing variety of foods. We compared two separate groups of children and young adults with atopic dermatitis evaluated a decade apart and found no difference in sensitization rates or overall clinical reactivity to a variety of foods. Allergies to egg, milk, wheat, soy, peanut, tree nuts, and seafood continue to account for ≈ 90% of food‐allergic reactions over the past decade.     

Labial food challenge in children with food allergy

The current increase in the prevalence of food allergies appears to have several causes including better screening, improved diagnosis and changes in both the techniques used by food manufacturers and eating habits. Labial food challenge (LFC)is simple, rapid to perform and is associated with only low risks of systemic reaction. It is thus an appealing alternative to the oral food challenge (OFC) for pediatric use.
We report a series of 202 LFC performed over two years in 142 children with food allergy suspected from the case history, positive skin prick tests and specific serum IgE assays: 156 LFC were positive; and 46 negative, followed by positive single-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (SB-PCFC). The foods provoking reactions were egg white (75 cases), peanut (60 cases), mustard (23 cases), cow's milk (13 cases), cod (8 cases), kiwi fruit, shrimp (4 cases each), chicken, peanut oil (3 cases each), hazel nuts (2 cases), and snails, apple, fennel, garlic, chilli peppers, pepper, and duck (1 case each). LFC positivity was mostly (89. 7% of cases) manifested as a labial edema with contiguous urticaria. There were systemic reactions in 4. 5% of cases: generalized urticaria, hoarseness and rapid-onset and generalized eczema. The 46 infants with negative LFC results had positive SBPCFC. The reactions were in 34 cases generalized urticaria, 10 cases asthma attacks, 2 cases early and generalized eczema, and in one case general anaphylactic shock. The sensitivity of the LFC was 77%. The LFC was easy to perform with children. Positive results indicate the presence of food allergy, but negative results require further investigations preferably double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC)