Ultrasonic root-end preparation with smooth and diamond-coated tips

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of smooth and diamond-coated ultrasonic retrotips on the external and internal surfaces of root-end preparations with the aid of a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Forty-four mesial roots of human mandibular molars were selected. The canals were cleaned, shaped and obturated using gutta-percha and sealer. The apical portions were resected at a 45 degrees-angle bevel exposing both mesial canals and the isthmus area. The roots were then divided into two groups according to the type of root-end preparation: Group A--performed with smooth retrotips (S) and Group B--performed with diamond-coated retrotips (DC). The specimens were coded and prepared for SEM evaluation. Observations of the external surface preparation showed that the S and DC retrotips produced very well-centered cavities involving both canals and isthmus area with minimal deviations and no perforative defects. When the internal surface of the root-end preparations was evaluated, it was evident that the use of S retrotips resulted in clean canal walls with little superficial debris and smear layer. Internal canal surfaces done with DC retrotips were irregular showing patent grooves, in contrast with the more uniform, regular and smoother surfaces when S retrotips were employed.     

An in vitro study comparing root-end cavities prepared by diamond-coated and stainless steel ultrasonic retrotips

AIM: This study compared the appearance of root-end cavity preparations and the time required to prepare them using prototype ultrasonic diamond-coated (DC) and stainless-steel (SS) retrotips. METHODOLOGY: In 12 maxillary and 12 mandibular molar teeth 48 root-end cavities were prepared ultrasonically in the palatal, mesio-buccal, distal and mesial root-ends using DC and SS retrotips, alternately. Replicas of the resected root tips and the root-end cavities were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM), recording (i) incidence and extent of dentine cracks (ii) minimum remaining thickness of the dentine walls and (iii) surface quality of the resected root-ends. The time taken to complete the preparation was also recorded. Means of these parameters were compared for both types of retrotips using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: No resected root-ends had cracks before preparation. However, after preparation one root-end cavity shaped by an SS retrotip had a microcrack visible at 23x magnification. Four and seven other root-ends had crazed surfaces in the DC and SS groups, respectively (P > 0.05). Remaining minimum dentine thickness was 0.56 +/- 0.28 mm and 0.71 +/- 0.24 for the DC and SS groups, respectively, and this difference was significant (P < 0.05). A root-end cavity in one specimen in the DC group was perforated. Preparation times ranged from 25 s to 361 s and were significantly lower for DC tips (P < 0.01) than the SS tips. The time required to prepare root-end cavities also differed between roots; root-end preparation in mandibular molars was more time consuming. CONCLUSIONS: A better quality surface was produced by the prototype diamond-coated retrotips, in less time than the SS retrotips, which in turn caused fewer cracks than previously reported. DC retrotips removed more dentine than SS retrotips and should therefore be used with care to avoid overpreparation or perforation.     

Evaluation of root-end cavity preparation using ultrasonic retrotips

AIM: To evaluate and compare the efficiency of root-end preparations using ultrasonic retrotips coated with diamond and zirconium nitride. METHODOLOGY: Eighty-five extracted single-rooted teeth were root filled, and then resected 3 mm from their apices. Root-end cavities were prepared with KiS (zirconium nitride-coated retrotip), CT-5 (stainless steel tip) or diamond-coated (DC) ultrasonic retrotips, and 10 teeth served as controls. Thirty teeth were used for evaluation of the time required to prepare the root-end cavity, the number of microcracks produced on the resected surface and the number of dentinal tubule openings on the root-canal wall using scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. A further 55 teeth were used for evaluation of dye penetration following filling of the root-end cavities with Super EBA. The degree of dye penetration in millimetres was measured under the microscope after 7 days of immersion in India ink. Statistical analyses were performed using the one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's F-test as the post hoc test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of microcracks and dentinal tubule openings present in the root apices prepared by the three retrotips. The time required for root-end cavity preparation using the DC retrotip was significantly less than that using the other groups (P<0.01). Positive controls showed dye penetration throughout the length of the root-end cavity, and negative controls showed no dye penetration. There was no significant difference between the three experimental groups in dye penetration. CONCLUSIONS: In this laboratory study, the time required to prepare root-end cavities using KiS retrotips was the same as that using CT-5 retrotips, and longer than that using DC retrotips. There was no significant difference in the number of microcracks or dye penetration between the three kinds of retrotips.     

Frequency and type of canal isthmuses in first molars detected by endoscopic inspection during periradicular surgery

AIM: To analyse the occurrence of canal isthmuses in molars following root-end resection. METHODOLOGY: The material consisted of 56 mandibular and 32 maxillary first molars subjected to periradicular surgery. Based on radiographic, clinical, as well as intraoperative status, only roots with associated pathological lesions were treated. In total, 124 roots were resected (80 mandibular and 44 maxillary molar roots). The cut root faces were inspected with a rigid endoscope following apical root-end resection. The number of canals as well as the presence and type of canal isthmuses were recorded. RESULTS: In maxillary first molars, 76% of resected mesio-buccal roots had two canals and an isthmus, 10% had two canals but no isthmus, and 14% had a single canal. All disto-buccal and palatal roots had one canal. In mandibular first molars, 83% of mesial roots had two canals with an isthmus. In 11%, two canals but no isthmus were present, and 6% demonstrated a single canal. Sixty-four per cent of distal roots had a single canal and 36% had two canals with an isthmus. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical study during periradicular surgery and intraoperative endoscopic examination of first permanent molars found a high frequency of canal isthmuses at the resection level. Endoscopic inspection also demonstrated that none of the isthmuses were filled, emphasizing the difficulty of orthograde instrumentation and root filling of canal isthmuses.     

Evaluation of diamond-coated ultrasonic instruments for root-end preparation

Ultrasonic instrumentation has been associated with cracking of the dentin in the area of the root-end preparation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate root-end preparations for cracking and to describe cavosurface morphology after the use of diamond-coated instruments. Forty teeth were inspected for intradentin cracks, incomplete canal cracks, and complete canal cracks before and after preparation with a stainless steel CT-5 ultrasonic instrument and again after root-end preparation with an S12D/90 degrees diamond-coated instrument. Six teeth had polyvinylsiloxane impressions taken of the root ends after preparation with the CT-5 and again after preparation with the diamond-coated instrument. Replicas were made, split, sputter-coated, and inspected using the scanning electron microscope. This study indicates that use of the diamond-coated instrument for root-end preparation does not result in significant root-end cracking and that it can remove cracks created by a prior instrument's use. The use of the diamond-coated instrument resulted in a heavily abraded, debris-covered cavosurface that may affect the apical seal.     

根管截面形态对超声根尖倒预备效果的影响

目的 研究不同根管截面形态(椭网形和圆形)对超声根尖倒预备效果的影响.方法 选取直的单根管离体牙,根据根管截面形态分为椭圆形根管组和网形根管组,每组各20颗,分别进行根管预备和充填,截去根尖3 mm.采用超声工作尖进行根尖倒预备,在体式显微镜和扫描电镜下观测根尖窝洞形态规则性、残余牙胶量和窝洞清洁程度.结果 体式显微镜观测结果显示两组根尖窝洞形态规则性差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),椭圆形组中所有样本均可见牙胶残余,圆形组中70%的样本无牙胶残余,超声倒预备后残余牙胶量椭圆形根管组高于圆形根管组(P<0.01);电镜观测结果显示,圆形组85%的样本存在玷污层,95%的样本可见开放牙本质小管;椭圆形组中所有样本均有玷污层存在,仅40%的样本可见开放牙本质小管,根尖窝洞清洁程度椭圆形根管组低于圆形根管组(P<0.01).结论 超声根尖倒预备难以完全去除玷污层,椭圆形根管倒预备效果比圆形根管差.     

超声波根尖倒预备的定量研究

目的:定量研究超声波与传统慢速手机根尖倒预备的差异.方法: 27 颗由一个峡部连接2个主根管的哑铃型牙根的离体上颌第二前磨牙,随机均分成3组,分别采用3种处理方式进行倒预备:(1)超声波Ⅰ组:超声波配金刚砂尖Berutti与镍钛尖RE2;(2)超声波Ⅱ组:超声波配40~#K锉;(3)慢速手机组:慢速手机配No.2圆钻.显微成像系统和数据分析系统分别测量预备前、后根切面的相关参数并进行计算分析,定量比较3 种倒预备技术牙体组织切割量的差异.结果: 使用超声波技术进行根尖倒预备切割的牙体组织量明显少于慢速手机(P<0.000 1).结论: 超声波倒预备技术获得的窝洞更保守,更居中,能更有效地保护牙根尖硬组织,保持牙根的强度.     

Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation

AIM: To examine if canal enlargement with instruments of controlled taper leads to more uniform stress distributions within a root, thereby reducing fracture susceptibility. METHODOLOGY: Finite element models of a mandibular incisor were constructed with round and oval canal profiles, based on measurements from extracted teeth. The shapes of rotary nickel-titanium instruments (ProTaper F1, F2, and F3 and ProFile size 30, 0.04 taper and size 30, 0.06 taper; Dentsply Maillefer) were superimposed on the canals. Equivalent stresses and circumferential stresses in the root were calculated for a compaction load. RESULTS: The highest stresses were found at the canal wall. Round canals showed lower uniform distributions, whilst oval canals showed uneven distributions with high concentrations at the buccal and lingual canal extensions and greater stresses in the coronal and middle thirds than in the apical third. Preparation of round canals introduced only small circumferential stress increases in the apical half; preparation of oval canals produced substantial reductions where the canal was enlarged to a smooth round shape. Even where fins were not completely eliminated, the maximum stresses were still reduced by up to 15%. External distal and mesial surfaces of roots with oval canals showed moderate stress concentrations that were minimally affected by preparations, whilst stress concentrations emerged on roots with round canals when preparation sizes increased. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for reducing fracture susceptibility exists as a result of round canal profiles achieved and smooth canal taper. Even when fins were not contacted by the instrument, stresses within the root were lower and more evenly distributed than before preparation.     

The quality of ultrasonic root-end preparation: a quantitative study

Ultrasonic root-end preparation techniques have recently been introduced and revolutionized the field of endodontic surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare quantitatively the quality of root-end preparation techniques prepared by a specially designed ultrasonic retrotip with those prepared in a traditional manner by a microhandpiece bur. Twenty roots with two canals and an isthmus from extracted maxillary human molars were selected for this study. After instrumentation, obturation, and root-end resection, root-end preparations were made using either an ultrasonic retrotip or a conventional microhandpiece bur. With the aid of the image processing and analysis system, the specimens were inspected under a stereomicroscope for further evaluation of the quality of the shape and size of preparation. The results of this investigation showed that the ultrasonic root-end preparations produced more conservative and less perforated cavities than those made with conventional microhandpiece bur preparations.     

In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars

This study histologically compared the in vivo debridement efficacy of hand/rotary canal preparation versus a hand/rotary/ultrasound technique in mesial root canals of vital mandibular molars. Group 1 consisted of 16 teeth prepared with a hand/rotary technique whereas group 2 consisted of 15 teeth prepared in similar fashion but followed by 1 min of ultrasonic irrigation, per canal, utilizing an ultrasonic needle in a MiniEndo unit. Five uninstrumented mandibular molars served as histologic controls. After extraction and histologic preparation, 0.5 microm cross-sections, taken every 0.2 mm from the 1- to 3-mm apical levels, were evaluated for percentage of tissue removal. Nonparametric analysis revealed mean percent canal and isthmus cleanliness values to be significantly higher for group 2 at all levels evaluated, except one. In conclusion, the 1 min use of the ultrasonic needle after hand/rotary instrumentation resulted in significantly cleaner canals and isthmuses in the mesial roots of mandibular molars.     

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy in periradicular surgery - a comparison with scanning electron microscopy

AIM: To compare the accuracy of endoscopic diagnostics with the scanning electron microscope (SEM) in evaluating elements of periradicular surgery. METHODOLOGY: The material consisted of 22 extracted human molars, which were subjected to the following treatments: orthograde root-canal obturation, root-end resection and root-end cavity preparation with diamond-coated sonic microtips. After each step, the cut root face was inspected with an endoscope, and subsequently, the roots were duplicated for SEM evaluation. Endoscope findings were compared to those obtained with SEM serving as the 'gold standard' with a blinded observer. The presence of the following structures was assessed including specificity and sensitivity: isthmuses, accessory canals, obturation gaps, microfractures and chipping of cavity margins. RESULTS: The specificity and sensitivity of the identification of isthmuses or accessory canals was 100% each for the endoscope compared to SEM. The sensitivity of identification of obturation gaps, crack formation or chipping ranged between 73 and 95% (except intradentine cracks with only 36% sensitivity). The specificity of the same parameters ranged between 77 and 100% for the endoscope compared to SEM. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of intradentine cracks, the endoscope accurately identified microstructures following root-end resection and root-end preparation. The endoscope could be considered for use during intraoperative diagnostics in periradicular surgery.     

A preliminary in vitro study of the incidence and position of the root canal isthmus in maxillary and mandibular first molars

AIM: To investigate in vitro the incidence and position of the root canal isthmus in extracted mesiobuccal roots of maxillary and mesial roots of mandibular first molars. METHODOLOGY: Fifty maxillary and 50 mandibular molars were included in the study. The mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars and the mesial roots of mandibular molars were sectioned from their crowns in the furcation region and embedded in clear resin. Transverse serial 1-mm-thick sections from the apical 6 mm were prepared. The apical side of each section was stained with India ink and observed through a light microscope. The sample images were saved to disk using a digital camera and the root canals in terms of the number present and the incidence and classification of isthmuses. RESULTS: In the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molars, 70% had one canal, whereas 29.5% had two canals. In the mesial root of mandibular molars, 41% had one canal, whereas 59% had two canals. In some sections, more than two canals were found close to the apical foramen. The isthmus incidence was greatest 3-5 mm from the apex. In teeth having two canals, a complete or partial isthmus was frequently observed in the sections between 3 and 4 mm from the apex. Of the isthmuses present, 22% were complete and 37% partial in mandibular molars and 17.3% were complete and 11.7% partial in maxillary molars. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of isthmus in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molars and in the mesial root of the mandibular first molars was high, particularly in sections 3-5 mm from the apex. Cleaning the isthmus is a major challenge during root canal treatment.     

Effect of root-end resection and root-end filling on apical leakage in the presence of core-carrier root canal obturation

AIM: To evaluate the apical seal of canals filled with a core-carrier obturator following root-end resection with and without a root-end filling. METHODOLOGY: Thirty single-rooted human teeth with single canals were used. Root canal treatment was performed and canals filled with a core-carrier obturation technique. The teeth were then randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10). In the first group root canal filling only was performed. After orthograde filling, the teeth of the second group were resected apically, perpendicular to the major axis of the root. In the third group after apical resection, a root-end cavity was prepared using ultrasonic diamond retrotips and the cavities filled with Super-EBA cement. During a period of 3 h and with a headspace pressure of 0.12 atm, methylene-blue solution was forced through a tube that was connected to the apical end of each tooth specimen. The coronal end of the tooth was connected to a capillary tube containing an air bubble. Leakage was evaluated by observing the distal displacement of the air bubble. The roots were then sectioned along their long axis. Using a stereomicroscope, linear dye infiltration at the dentine-cement interface was determined. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the three groups. RESULTS: Linear dye infiltration was significantly greater in root canals filled with the core-carrier obturators and resected apically (0.9 +/- 0.9 mm) when compared with those that had root-end fillings (0.2 +/- 0.4 mm). Air bubble displacement was not observed. CONCLUSION: Root-end filling improves the sealing of roots with core-carrier obturation following root-end resection.     

Effect of sonic and ultrasonic retrograde cavity preparation on the integrity of root apices of freshly extracted human teeth: scanning electron microscopy analysis

Sonic and ultrasonic root-end preparation devices permit the preparation of conservative and straight cavities. However, microfractures and marginal chipping can occur due to the vibratory action of such instruments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of retrograde preparations by using sonic and ultrasonic tips on the integrity of root-end surfaces. Eighty, human anterior teeth were grouped according to size and treated as follows: treatment 1: root-end resection (RR) and root-end cavity preparation (RP) with KIS ultrasonic retrotip; treatment 2: RR and RP with Satelec S12/90 (no diamond coating) ultrasonic retrotip; treatment 3: RR and RP with a diamond-coated retrotip attached to a sonic device (Sonics); treatment 4: RR and RP with Satelec S12/90D (diamond coated) ultrasonic retrotip. The root-end surface topographies were assayed by means of polyvinylsiloxane impressions and epoxy resin replicas. SEM pictures of each sample were taken before and after preparation, and the images were evaluated by using an image processing and analysis system. The parameters evaluated were shape quality, presence of cracks, and marginal chipping. The results showed no statistically significant differences among anatomic groups, treatments, or tooth sizes (p > 0.05). Because treatment 3 removed more dental structure than the others did, its use on small teeth is inadvisable.     

下颌第一磨牙近中根管的根管口分型和临床疗效分析

目的探讨下颌第一磨牙近中根管的根管口形态特点和临床治疗方法。方法选取71颗临床进行根管治疗的下颌第一磨牙．在手术显微镜下观察并记录近中根管的根管口形态．分类计数;采用Protaper机用镍钛器械及超声器械进行根管预备,常规针式冲洗合并超声荡洗．热牙胶垂直加压充填技术充填根管;根据治疗前后临床检查及x线片评价根管预备和充填的效果。结果所有样本中单根管口出现率为2．82％（2例）、双根管口为91．55％（65例）、三根管口为5．63％（4例）。其中双根管口之间有峡区的为38例（53．52％）、无峡区的为27例（38．03％）。所有患牙根管治疗后均无根管内并发症发生．术后1年根管治疗成功率为92．9％。结论下颌第一磨牙根管形态复杂,手术显微镜有助于根管形态的探查．机用镍钛器械合并超声技术预备根管．超声冲洗和热牙胶垂直加压技术充填根管可获得良好的治疗效果。     

Microsurgical instruments for root-end cavity preparation following apicoectomy: a literature review

Root-end cavities have traditionally been prepared by means of small round or inverted cone burs in a micro-handpiece. Since sonically or ultrasonically driven microsurgical retrotips became commercially available in the early 1990s, this new technique of retrograde root canal instrumentation has been established as an essential adjunct in periradicular surgery. At first glance, the most relevant clinical advantages are the enhanced access to root ends in limited working space and the smaller osteotomy required for surgical access because of the various angled designs and small size of the retrotips. However, a number of experimental studies comparing root-end preparations made with microsurgical tips to those made with burs have demonstrated other advantages of this new technique, such as deeper cavities that follow the original path of the root canal more closely. The more centered root-end preparation also lessens the risk of lateral perforation. In addition, the geometry of the retrotip design does not require a beveled root-end resection for surgical access thus decreasing the number of exposed dentinal tubules. A controversial issue of sonic or ultrasonic root-end preparation is the formation of cracks or microfractures, and its implication on healing success. The present paper reviews experimental and clinical studies about the use of microsurgical retrotips in periradicular surgery and discusses many issues raised in previous papers.     

An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars

This study compared the in vivo debridement efficacy of the step-back preparation versus a step-back/ultrasound preparation in the mesial root canals of vital human mandibular molars. Group 1 consisted of 15 teeth prepared with a step-back technique using intermittent irrigation with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Group 2 consisted of 23 teeth prepared with a step-back technique as in group 1 followed by 3 min of ultrasonic instrumentation (Cavi-Endo) using 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (30 ml per min). Group 3 consisted of 21 teeth which were uninstrumented and served as controls. Following extraction and histological preparation, the 1- and 3-mm levels of the canal and isthmus were evaluated for percentage of tissue removal using a compensating polar planimeter. At the 3-mm level, there were no statistical differences in canal or isthmus cleanliness between the step-back group and the step-back/ultrasound group. At the 1-mm apical level, statistical analysis indicated that the step-back/ultrasonic technique was superior to the step-back technique in canal (99.6% versus 88%) and isthmus (86% versus 10%) cleanliness.     

An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.

This study histologically compared the in vivo debridement efficacy of the step-back preparation versus a step-back/ultrasound preparation in the mesial root canals of vital mandibular molars. Group 1 consisted of 17 teeth prepared with a step-back technique using intermittent irrigation with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Group 2 consisted of 17 teeth prepared with a step-back technique as in group 1 followed by 3 min of ultrasonic instrumentation per canal utilizing a #15 Endosonic file in an Enac unit set at 3.5. An additional 6 ml/canal of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite was used during the ultrasonic preparation. Eight uninstrumented mandibular molars served as histological controls. Following extraction and histological preparation, 0.2-microns cross-sections from the 1- to 3-mm apical levels of the canal and isthmus were evaluated for percentage of tissue removal using an Olympus CUE-2 Image Analysis System. Factorial analysis of variance indicated canal and isthmus cleanliness values were significantly higher, at all 11 apical levels, with the ultrasonic technique. Sample values at the 1-, 2-, and 3-mm levels for the step-back and step-back/ultrasonic techniques, respectively, were: canal, 64% versus 92%, 81% versus 97%, and 90% versus 99.9%; isthmus, 2% versus 46%, 15% versus 60%, and 16% versus 83%.     

Preliminary results and analysis of a new set of sonic instruments for root-end cavity preparation

The introduction of microinstruments for root-end cavity preparation has clearly improved the surgical technique in periradicular surgery with apicectomy. The new generation of sonic and ultrasonic root-end preparation devices, usually termed 'retrotips', has simplified the preparation of a sufficiently deep cavity that follows the original path of the root canal. The present paper describes the use of a new set of diamond-surfaced retrotips driven by a sonic handpiece. For clinical evaluation a prospective study was carried out, with assessment of pre-, intra- and postoperative data in 50 teeth (43 patients). This paper analyses: (i) the applicability of the new retrotips; (ii) the quality of the root-end filling assessed radiographically; (iii) the immediate postoperative course. Access with the retrotips to the resected root-end was found to be excellent in 80% of the treated teeth. The postoperative radiographs showed a root-end filling of at least 3 mm in 70% of the resected teeth. Healing was uneventful in all cases and most patients presented without any symptoms after 5 days and 10 days. The long-term treatment outcome will be reported in a future paper.     

Ex vivo microscopic assessment of factors affecting the quality of apical seal created by root-end fillings

AIM: (i) To evaluate the incidence of microcracks around root-end preparations completed with ultrasonic tips and their relationship with the root filling technique and thickness of surrounding dentine. (ii) To investigate the effect of rapid exposure to a water-soluble dye of Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM), Super Ethoxybenzoic Acid (sEBA) and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), on the marginal adaptation and microleakage of root-end fillings. (iii) To describe the microstructure of the surface of root-end filling materials. METHODOLOGY: Ninety-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups (n = 46) according to the root canal instrumentation/filling techniques. Group 1 consisted of specimens in which canal preparation was completed using a crown-down technique and then filled with the Thermafil system (TF group); Group 2 consisted of specimens in which canal preparation was completed using a step-back technique and lateral condensation (LC group). Following root-end resection and ultrasonic cavity preparation, the samples were further divided into three subgroups (n = 24) for root-end filling with IRM, sEBA or MTA. The ultrasonic preparation time was recorded. Eight teeth were kept as positive and 12 as negative controls. Following immersion in Indian ink for 7 days, all resected root surfaces were evaluated for the presence of microcracks and the cross-sectional area of root-end surface and root-end filling were measured to evaluate the thickness of the dentinal walls. Thereafter, the samples were sectioned longitudinally so as to assess the depth of dye penetration and marginal adaptation of root-end fillings. Negative controls longitudinally sectioned were used to describe microstructural characteristics of the root-end filling materials using scanning electron microscopic (SEM) techniques. RESULTS: Although the thickness of dentinal walls between groups 1 and 2 was similar, the ultrasonic preparation time and number of microcracks were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the TF group. Both groups had a significant correlation between microcracks and ultrasonic preparation time (P < 0.001). sEBA and IRM had better adaptation and less leakage compared with MTA. A SEM analysis displayed microstructural differences between the root-end filling materials. CONCLUSION: Microcracks can occur independently of the thickness of dentinal walls and may be associated with the prolonged ultrasonic preparation time required for the removal of the root filling during root-end cavity preparation. Although sEBA and IRM had better behaviour than MTA regarding microleakage and marginal adaptation, it is possible that exposure of MTA to a water-soluble dye before achieving full set and its porous microstructure contributed to the results.