Comparison of the Diagnostic Ability of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured using Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

 Purpose: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic ability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements using time domain (Stratus) and spectral domain (Cirrus HD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) in preperimetric and early primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: A total 62 eyes of 62 normal subjects, 47 eyes of 47 early perimetric damage POAG patients and 30 eyes of 30 preperimetric glaucoma patients were chosen in the study. All the subjects underwent peripapillary RNFL thickness measurements using Stratus OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT on the same day by a single trained operator. The RNFL thickness measured by Stratus OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT was statistically compared using paired t-tests. The relationship between RNFL thickness measured by two OCT instruments was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROC) were calculated and compared. Results: RNFL thickness measured using Stratus OCT was generally thicker than that using Cirrus HD-OCT(P＜0.05). A highly significant correlation between the two OCT instruments measurements was found in four quadrants and average RNFL thickness measurements (P＜0.001). The average RNFL thickness of Cirrus HD-OCT had significantly (P = 0.006) higher diagnostic ability (AROC = 0.951) than that of Stratus OCT (AROC = 0.881) in preperimetric glaucoma. There were no significant differences between the AROCs for other RNFL thickness parameters from Cirrus HD-OCT and Stratus OCT in preperimetric and early glaucoma (P＞0.05). Conclusion: Significant differences and an excellent correlation were noted in terms of RNFL thickness measurements using Stratus OCT and Cirrus HD-OCT. Cirrus HD-OCT presented higher diagnostic ability for preperimetric glaucoma.     

Comparison of glaucomatous parameters in normal, ocular hypertensive and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography 3000

This study was performed to evaluate optic disc appearance, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and macular thickness in normal, ocular hypertensive (OHT) and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography (OCT) 3000. One hundred fifty-eight eyes of 167 consecutive subjects were enrolled: 60 normal, 53 OHT, and 54 glaucomatous. OCT topographic parameters of cup diameter, cup area, rim area, and cup/disc area ratio were significantly less in OHT eyes than in normal eyes and were significantly less in glaucomatous eyes than in normal and OHT eyes. RNFL was significantly thinner in OHT eyes than in normal eyes in the inferior quadrant, and in glaucomatous eyes than in OHT and normal eyes in the mean and for all four quadrants. Macular thickness was significantly thinner in glaucomatous eyes than in OHT and normal eyes throughout all subdivisions. Optic disc parameters, and RNFL and macular thickness measurements made with OCT may be useful in the clinical assessment of glaucoma.     

Usefulness of optical coherence tomography parameters of the optic disc and the retinal nerve fiber layer to differentiate glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes

PURPOSE: To assess Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) original parameters for identifying glaucomatous damage and to evaluate differences among glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional prospective study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at 2 centers. The study population consisted of 55 normal individuals, 95 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 79 patients with glaucoma. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve head OCT protocols were used to evaluate all study participants. Measurements taken were RNFL thickness, several ratios, RNFL asymmetry between both eyes, rim volume, rim width, disc area, cup area, rim area, cup/disc (C/D) area ratio, and horizontal and vertical C/D ratios. The main outcome measures were the differences in OCT parameters among groups and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AROC). RESULTS: Mean RNFL thickness around the disc, and superior and inferior RNFL thickness, were significantly thinner in glaucomatous eyes than in OHT or normal eyes (P<0.001). Rim parameters were significantly smaller in glaucomatous eyes than in normal (P<0.001) and OHT eyes (P=0.01). C/D ratios were significantly greater in glaucomatous eyes than in OHT (P<0.001) and normal (P<0.001) eyes. Significant differences were found between normal and OHT eyes in 7 disc parameters. No difference was found among groups in parameters describing RNFL asymmetry between both eyes. The AROC curves of the other RNFL and disk parameters ranged from 0.741 to 0.85. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all RNFL and disc parameters showed significant differences and discriminated between glaucomatous and normal eyes. There were significant differences in some optic nerve parameters, but no RNFL parameters, between normal and OHT eyes.     

Comparison between GDx VCC scanning laser polarimetry and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of chronic glaucoma

PURPOSE: To compare the abilities of scanning laser polarimetry with the variable corneal compensator (GDx VCC) with those of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT) in discriminating between healthy and early-to-moderate perimetric glaucomatous eyes. METHODS: A total of 95 glaucomatous patients (mean deviation - 3.7 +/- 3.0 dB, pattern standard deviation 4.5 +/- 2.7 dB) and 62 control subjects underwent imaging by the GDx VCC and Stratus OCT using both optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) scan protocols. One eye per patient was considered. Sensitivity at > or = 90% specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC) were calculated for each GDx VCC and Stratus OCT index. RESULTS: The largest AROCs with Stratus OCT were associated with cup : disc area ratio (0.88) for ONH scan indices, and with average thickness (0.84) for RNFL scan indices. The nerve fibre indicator provided the greatest AROC for the GDx VCC indices (0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Both the GDx VCC and Stratus OCT instruments were shown to be useful in the detection of glaucomatous damage. The best performing indices for the GDx VCC and Stratus OCT with both ONH and RNFL scans gave similar AROCs, showing a moderate sensitivity in early-to-moderate glaucoma patients.     

Stratus OCT与GDxVCC测量正常人与青光眼患者视网膜神经纤维层厚度比较研究

目的 比较相干光断层扫描仪StratusOCT与激光偏振光视网膜扫描仪GDxVCC测量视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度的相关性及差异,探讨两者测量值与视野的相关性及其对青光眼的诊断效能.方法 84例原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者及50名正常人,随机选取一眼进行StratusOCT和GDxVCCRNFL厚度测量及Humphery自动视野计检查.相关分析比较两种仪器测量的全周、上方、下方RNFL厚度;回归分析研究视野的平均偏差与两种仪器测量的RNFL厚度值之间的关系;ROC曲线下面积分析两种仪器诊断青光眼的效能.结果 Stratus OCT测量正常人及POAG患者的全周RNFL厚度分别为(100.00±7.36)μm和(75.12±17.11)μm,GDxVCC对应测量值(57.16±5.05)μm和(48.00.4±8.46)μm.两种仪器测量的RNFL厚度呈线性相关(r>0.75).两种仪器测量的RNFL厚度值与视野的平均偏差呈正相关,三次曲线拟合度较直线相关的拟合度好.对于青光眼诊断,Stratus OCT的最大ROC曲线下面积为0.908,GDxVCC最大ROC曲线下面积为0.842.结论 Stratus OCT与GDxVCC测量RNFL厚度值存在差异,但两者呈线性相关,均与视野的平均偏差呈曲线相关.两种仪器诊断青光眼的效能均较好.     

Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE: To compare the ability of optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), optic nerve head, and macular thickness parameters to differentiate between healthy eyes and eyes with glaucomatous visual field loss. DESIGN: Observational case-control study. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with glaucoma and 78 healthy subjects were included. All patients underwent ONH, RNFL thickness, and macular thickness scans with Stratus OCT during the same visit. ROC curves and sensitivities at fixed specificities were calculated for each parameter. A discriminant analysis was performed to develop a linear discriminant function designed to identify and combine the best parameters. This LDF was subsequently tested on an independent sample consisting of 63 eyes of 63 subjects (27 glaucomatous and 36 healthy individuals) from a different geographic area. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) for the RNFL thickness parameter with the largest AUC (inferior thickness, AUC = 0.91) and the ONH parameter with largest AUC (cup/disk area ratio, AUC = 0.88) (P = .28). The RNFL parameter inferior thickness had a significantly larger AUC than the macular thickness parameter with largest AUC (inferior outer macular thickness, AUC = 0.81) (P = .004). A combination of selected RNFL and ONH parameters resulted in the best classification function for glaucoma detection with an AUC of 0.97 when applied to the independent sample. CONCLUSIONS: RNFL and ONH measurements had the best discriminating performance among the several Stratus OCT parameters. A combination of ONH and RNFL parameters improved the diagnostic accuracy for glaucoma detection using this instrument.     

Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role and ability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to detect differences in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness between normal and glaucomatous eyes and also between different severities of glaucoma. METHOD: This cross-sectional observational study included 160 eyes of 160 healthy subjects and 134 eyes of 134 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured on OCT using the fast RNFL thickness protocol. The RNFL thickness parameters used for evaluation included average RNFL thickness and inferior, superior, nasal, and temporal RNFL thickness. The glaucomatous eyes were subdivided into three subgroups on the basis of visual field defects and a fourth subgroup of eyes blinded by glaucoma. RNFL thickness parameters were compared among the normal eyes and the glaucoma subgroups. Correlation of global visual field indices with RNFL thickness parameters was also performed. RESULTS: The average RNFL in control subjects, early glaucoma, moderate glaucoma, severe glaucoma, and blind glaucoma were 102.30 +/- 10.34, 77.68 +/- 15.7, 66.07 +/- 15.5, 53.65 +/- 14.2, and 44.93 +/- 4.95 microm, respectively. There was a significant difference in all RNFL thickness parameters between normal and all glaucoma subgroups (P < 0.001). Average and inferior RNFL thicknesses showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, with 0.905 and 0.862 for normal versus early glaucoma, 0.705 and 0.722 for early versus moderate glaucoma, 0.737 and 0.717 for moderate versus severe glaucoma, and 0.635 and 0.584 for severe versus blind glaucoma. Both mean deviation (MD) and corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD) showed a significant correlation with all the RNFL thickness parameters in eyes with glaucoma (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RNFL thickness measured on OCT may serve as useful adjuncts in accurately and more objectively distinguishing normal from glaucomatous eyes, even in the early stages of glaucoma and may help to differentiate various severities of glaucoma. Average and inferior RNFL thicknesses are among the most efficient parameters for distinguishing such a differentiation. RNFL thicknesses in eyes blinded by glaucoma provide an estimate of the component of the RNFL thickness, which is not related to visual function.     

The relationship between optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry measurements in glaucoma

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) in measuring peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in glaucomatous eyes. METHODS: Fifty glaucomatous eyes were evaluated in this study. Evaluations were analyzed two ways. First, parameters of the Stratus OCT (average thickness, superior/inferior average) and GDx VCC (TSNIT average, nerve fiber indicator (NFI), superior/inferior average) were correlated using the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). Secondly, comparison (r) of these parameters was completed using the mean deviation (MD) of visual field defect. RESULTS: The following parameters were found to be significantly correlated (P < 0.005). TSNIT average/average thickness (r = 0.673), NFI/average thickness (r = -0.742), superior average (r = 0.841), and inferior average (r = 0.736). In the correlation analysis using the severity of visual field defect, all these parameters had statistically meaningful correlations (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: GDx VCC and Stratus OCT are highly correlated in glaucomatous eyes. Therefore, peripapillary RNFL thickness measured by Stratus OCT and GDx VCC may be equally helpful in the diagnosis of glaucoma.     

Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements using the stratus OCT in normal and glaucomatous eyes

PURPOSE: To determine the reproducibility of Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements around the optic nerve in normal and glaucomatous eyes. METHODS: One eye was chosen at random from 88 normal subjects and 59 glaucomatous subjects distributed among mild, moderate, and severe glaucoma, determined by visual field testing. Subjects underwent six RNFL thickness measurements performed by a single operator over a 30-minute period with a brief rest between sessions. Three scans were taken with the high-density Standard RNFL protocol, and three were taken with the Fast RNFL protocol, alternating between scan protocols. RESULTS: Reliability, as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), was calculated for the overall mean RNFL thickness and for each quadrant. The ICC for the mean Standard RNFL thickness (and lower 95% confidence interval [CI]) in normal and glaucomatous eyes was 0.97 (0.96 CI) and 0.98 (0.97 CI), respectively. The ICC for the mean Fast RNFL thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes was 0.95 (0.93 CI) and 0.97 (0.95 CI), respectively. Quadrant ICCs ranged between 0.79 and 0.97, with the nasal quadrant being the least reproducible of all four quadrants, using either the Standard or Fast RNFL program. The test-retest variability ranged from 3.5 microm for the average RNFL thickness measurements in normal eyes to 13.8 microm for the nasal quadrant measurements in glaucomatous eyes, which appeared to be the most variable. CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of RNFL measurements using the Stratus OCT is excellent in normal and glaucomatous eyes. The nasal quadrant appears to be the most variable measurement. Standard RNFL and Fast RNFL scans are equally reproducible and yield comparable measurements. These findings have implications for the diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucomatous progression.     

Early detection of thinning of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucomatous eyes by optical coherence tomography 3000: analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer corresponding to the preserved hemivisual field

The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was measured with the optical coherence tomography using version 3.0 software (OCT3000) in 153 eyes of 153 normal subjects. The mean of the average RNFL thickness over the entire 360 degrees in the control group was 92.5 +/- 12.9 microm which was significantly thinner than the normative data of 95.9 +/- 11.4 microm included with the OCT3000 (p < 0.01). The RNFL thickness decreased with increasing age (p < 0.01, r = -0.395). The RNFL thickness was also measured in 53 eyes of 53 patients with glaucoma whose superior (13 eyes) or inferior (40 eyes) perimetric hemifields were normal. Only the RNFL thickness corresponding to the preserved perimetric hemifields were measured by OCT3000 and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO). The RNFL thickness in the superior and inferior 30 degrees sectors, the maximum and average RNFL thickness in the superior (S(max) and S(avg)), and inferior quadrants (I(max) and I(avg)) were analyzed.The S(max), S(avg), I(max), I(avg), and the RNFL thickness in the superior (p < 0.05), superotemporal and inferotemporal sectors (p < 0.01) in the glaucoma patients without a nerve fiber layer defect (SLO) were significantly thinner than in the control subjects in same age. OCT3000 measurements showed that the RNFL thickness in glaucomatous eyes with normal perimetric visual fields and SLO was significantly thinner than the RNFL thickness in normal eyes.     

Baseline optical coherence tomography predicts the development of glaucomatous change in glaucoma suspects

PURPOSE: To assess whether baseline retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements obtained with optical coherence tomography (OCT2; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) are predictive of the development of glaucomatous change. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Participants were recruited from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) longitudinal Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS). One eye was studied from each of 114 glaucoma suspects with normal standard automated perimetry (SAP) and OCT RNFL imaging at baseline. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the development of glaucomatous change (repeatable abnormal visual fields and/or a change in the stereophotographic appearance of the optic disk). Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the predictive ability of OCT RNFL thickness measurements. RESULTS: Over a 4.2-year average follow-up period, 23 eyes (20%) developed glaucomatous changes and 91 (80%) did not. At baseline, thinner RNFL measurements, higher SAP pattern standard deviation (PSD), "glaucoma" stereophotograph assessment, and thinner central corneal thickness (CCT) were associated with the study endpoints in univariate analysis. After adjusting for age, intraocular pressure (IOP), CCT, and PSD in multivariate models, a 10 mum thinner average, superior and inferior RNFL at baseline was predictive of glaucomatous change [hazard ratio (95% CI); 1.51 (1.11 to 2.12), 1.57 (1.17 to 2.18), and 1.49, (1.19 to 1.91), respectively]. Results were consistent when stereophotographic assessment was included in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Thinner OCT RNFL measurements at baseline were associated with development of glaucomatous change in glaucoma suspect eyes. RNFL thinning was an independent predictor of the glaucomatous change, even when adjusting for stereophotograph assessment, age, IOP, CCT, and PSD.     

Comparisons of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer loss patterns and its diagnostic performance between normal tension glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma: a detailed, severity-based study

AIM: To evaluate the patterns of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) loss in normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in a detailed, disease severity-matched way; and to assess the diagnostic capabilities of GCIPL thickness parameters in discriminating NTG or POAG from normal subjects. METHODS: A total of 157 eyes of 157 subjects, including 57 normal eyes, 51 eyes with POAG and 49 eyes with NTG were enrolled and strictly matched in age, refraction, and disease severity between POAG and NTG groups. The average, minimum, superotemporal, superior, superonasal, inferonasal, inferior, and inferotemporal GCIPL thickness, and the average, superior, temporal, inferior, and nasal retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were obtained by Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT). The diagnostic capabilities of OCT parameters were assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. RESULTS: Among all the OCT thickness parameters, no statistical significant difference between NTG group and POAG group was found (all P>0.05). In discriminating NTG or POAG from normal subjects, the average and inferior RNFL thickness, and the minimum GCIPL thickness had better diagnostic capabilities. There was no significant difference in AUROC curve between the best GCIPL thickness parameter (minimum GCIPL) and the best RNFL thickness parameter in discriminating NTG (inferior RNFL; P=0.076) and indiscriminating POAG (average RNFL; P=0.913) from normal eyes. CONCLUSION: Localized GCIPL loss, especially in the inferior and inferotemporal sectors, is more common in NTG than in POAG. Among all the GCIPL thickness parameters, the minimum GCIPL thickness has the best diagnostic performance in differentiating NTG or POAG from normal subjects, which is comparable to that of the average and inferior RNFL thickness.     

Correlation between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and central corneal thickness in patients with ocular hypertension: an optical coherence tomography study

PURPOSE: To correlate the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and optic nerve head (ONH) parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) with central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: setting: Tertiary care referral teaching institute. study population: Fifty-one eyes of 51 patients with OHT and 35 eyes of 35 normal subjects. Both groups were stratified into thin (CCT < or =555 microm) and thick (CCT >555 microm) cornea subsets. Ocular hypertensives were further stratified by CCT into < or =555 microm, 556 to 588 microm, and >588 microm subsets. observation procedure: RNFL thickness (average, superior average, and inferior average) and ONH parameters were measured by OCT. CCT was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. main outcome measures: Correlation between CCT and OCT measurements of RNFL and ONH parameters. RESULTS: In the OHT group, CCT correlated significantly with all three RNFL measurements (Pearson's coefficient r = 0.412, 0.484, and 0.380, respectively) but with only four ONH parameters (cup-to-disk area ratio, cup area, rim area, and horizontally integrated rim width; r = -0.459, -0.283, 0.421, and 0.436, respectively). The RNFL in ocular hypertensives with CCT < or =555 microm was significantly thinner than in those with thick corneas (analysis of variance, post hoc Bonferroni comparisons, P < .001). RNFL thickness of normal subjects and ocular hypertensives with CCT >555 microm were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular hypertensives with CCT < or =555 microm may represent patients who have either very early undetected glaucoma or an inherent structural predisposition to glaucomatous damage. This may in part explain the higher risk of these patients for progression to glaucoma.     

Comparability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements of optical coherence tomography instruments

PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements between two ocular coherence tomography (OCT) instruments (OCT 2000 and Stratus OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) and compare their diagnostic precision. METHODS: One hundred thirty-nine consecutive subjects were imaged (3 x 3.4-mm diameter circular scans) on the same day with each instrument. Thirty-five patients were excluded due to poor-quality images. RNFL thicknesses measured by the two instruments were compared, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine diagnostic precision. RESULTS: A randomly selected eye of each of 104 participants (28 with open-angle glaucoma, 40 with suspected glaucoma, and 36 healthy subjects) was analyzed. RNFL thickness measurements generally were thicker with OCT 2000 than with Stratus OCT. The difference in global RNFL thickness between instruments was within 20 microm in 66 (65%) of subjects and within 10 microm (the instrument's limit of resolution) in 25 (25%) subjects. Application of a correction factor to OCT 2000 measurements predicted Stratus OCT RNFL thickness within 10 microm of the observed measurement in 75% of the eyes. For both instruments, highest ROC curve areas (better discrimination between glaucomatous and normal eyes) were found in the inferior sector. Discrimination using global RNFL thickness was better with Stratus OCT than OCT 2000 (P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: RNFL thickness measurements measured by OCT 2000 can be approximated to measurements made by Stratus OCT using correction factors calculated by this study. However, there remains considerable variability that exceeds the limits of resolution afforded by the instruments themselves. Therefore comparisons between instruments using these approximations should be interpreted with caution.     

Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness between Stratus and Spectralis OCT

Purpose

To compare the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness of normal patients and those with various glaucoma diseases by time domain (Stratus) and spectral domain (Spectralis) optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Methods

The RNFL thickness as measured by the Stratus and Spectral OCT was compared (paired t-test). The relationship and agreement of RNFL thickness between the two OCT modalities were evaluated by Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plot, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Two-hundred seventeen eyes of 217 patients, including twenty-four normal eyes, ninety-one glaucoma suspects, seventy-six normal tension glaucoma cases, and twenty-six primary open angle glaucoma cases (POAG) were analyzed. The peripapillary RNFL thicknesses as measured by Stratus OCT were significantly greater than those measured by Spectralis OCT. However, in quadrant comparisons, the temporal RNFL thickness obtained using Stratus OCT were significantly less than those obtained using Spectralis OCT. Correlations between RNFL parameters were strong (Pearson correlation coefficient for mean RNFL thickness = 0.88); a high degree of correlation was found in the POAG group. Bland-Altman plotting demonstrated that agreement in the temporal quadrant was greater than any other quadrant.

Conclusions

Both OCT systems were highly correlated and demonstrated strong agreement. However, absolute measurements of peripapillary RNFL thickness differed between Stratus OCT and Spectralis OCT. Thus, measurements with these instruments should not be considered interchangeable. The temporal quadrant was the only sector where RNFL thickness as measured by Spectralis OCT was greater than by Stratus OCT; this demonstrated greater agreement than other sectors.     

神经节细胞复合体厚度检测在原发性开角型青光眼中的诊断价值

背景 青光眼以损害视网膜神经节细胞(RGCs)继而出现视野缺损为特征,高分辨率频域OCT(SD-OCT)可以准确可靠地定量分析黄斑区视网膜神经节细胞复合体(GCC)厚度. 目的 探讨黄斑区GCC厚度对原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)的诊断意义.方法 采用前瞻性诊断试验研究设计.于2015年11月至2016年4月在北京同仁医院连续纳入POAG患者70例和30名健康志愿者,应用RTVue SD-OCT对70例POAG患者和30名正常对照者进行黄斑区GCC厚度和视盘周围视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度检测,并行Humphrey视野检查,均纳入受检者的右眼进行统计.根据视野检查的平均缺损(MD)值将POAG分为早期、进展期和晚期,对各组受检眼平均GCC、上方GCC和下方GCC、平均RNFL、上方RNFL、下方RNFL、局部丢失体积(FLV)和整体丢失体积(GLV)进行比较;评估POAG患者GCC厚度、RNFL厚度与视野MD值的关系,采用曲线下面积(AUC)和受试者工作特征ROC曲线评价GCC厚度和RNFL厚度对POAG的诊断效率. 结果 与正常对照组比较,早期POAG组、进展期POAG组和晚期POAG组的平均GCC、上方GCC、下方GCC、平均RNFL、上方RNFL和下方RNFL均明显降低,FLV和GLV均明显升高,各组间总体比较差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.001);与早期POAG组比较,进展期POAG组和晚期POAG组受检眼平均GCC值和平均RNFL厚度值均明显下降,GLV值明显增加,差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.05);晚期POAG组受检眼上方RNFL厚度值明显低于早期POAG组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.003);晚期POAG组受检眼上方GCC值明显低于早期POAG组和进展期POAG组,差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.001);与早期POAG组比较,进展期POAG组和晚期POAG组受检眼下方GCC和下方RNFL厚度值明显下降,FLV明显增加,差异均有统计学意义(均P≤0.01).POAG患者平均GCC、上方GCC和下方GCC、平均RNFL、上方RNFL和下方RNFL与MD值均呈线性正相关(r=0.624、0.583、0.601、0.571、0.447、0.537,均P＜0.001);POAG患者平均GCC与平均RNFL、上方GCC与上方RNFL以及下方GCC与下方RNFL均呈线性正相关(r=0.648、0.630、0.602,均P＜0.001).平均GCC、上方GCC、下方GCC、FLV、GLV、平均RNFL、上方RNFL和下方RNFL的AUC值分别为0.965、0.924、0.979、0.985、0.980、0.990、0.979和0.992(均P＜O.001).GCC参数中FLV与下方RNFL的AUC值比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05). 结论 POAG患者下方GCC厚度更容易受到损伤,GCC参数中FLV和GLV是诊断POAG的敏感指标,GCC厚度可以作为诊断和判断POAG病情进展的有效指标.     

Retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by optical coherence tomography in glaucoma suspects with short-wavelength perimetry abnormalities

PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements in normal and glaucoma subjects with short-wavelength automatic perimetry (SWAP) abnormalities and in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma (CPOAG) patients using optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Forty-eight eyes of normal subjects, 34 eyes of glaucoma suspects with SWAP abnormalities, and 38 eyes of early CPOAG subjects were recruited. All normal and glaucoma suspects had normal conventional automated perimetry visual field results. All participants underwent full clinical ophthalmologic evaluation followed by OCT RNFL measurements. RESULTS: Compared with normal controls, OCT RNFL thickness was significantly lower in glaucoma suspects with abnormal SWAP (inferotemporal and superotemporal thickness values) and CPOAG patients (average, superior, inferior, inferotemporal, and superotemporal thickness values) (P < 0.01). Some parameters were found to be significantly lower in CPOAG patients than the glaucoma suspects with abnormal SWAP (average, inferior, inferotemporal, and superotemporal thickness values) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: OCT RNFL measurements appear to correlate well with SWAP abnormalities in glaucoma, and may detect glaucomatous damage earlier than standard conventional automated perimetry. This study suggests that OCT may recognize the earliest evidence of structure alterations in CPOAG.     

基于视网膜神经纤维层厚度及神经节细胞复合体诊断POAG的效能分析

目的：比较原发性开角型青光眼( primary open angle glaucoma,POAG)与正常对照组盘周视网膜神经纤维层厚度( retinal nerve fiber layer thickness,RNFL)及黄斑区神经节细胞复合体( ganglion cell complex,GCC)厚度差异,并评价盘周 RNFL 厚度及黄斑 GCC 厚度在 POAG 中的诊断价值。
　　方法：采用横断面研究。连续的POAG患者56例纳入研究。选择同期年龄、性别、屈光度及眼轴匹配的正常人60名60眼作为正常对照组。用RTVue-100光学相干断层扫描技术( optical coherence tomography,OCT)检测并比较POAG组及对照组盘周RNFL厚度及黄斑GCC厚度。采用受试者工作特征曲线( receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)及ROC曲线下面积( area under curve,AUC)评价盘周 RNFL 厚度及黄斑 GCC 厚度对青光眼的诊断价值。
　　结果：POAG组患者盘周所有象限RNFL均薄于正常对照组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.001)。 POAG组患者黄斑所有区域GCC厚度均小于正常对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。多因素线性回归分析结果,PAOG诊断是盘周RNFL厚度与黄斑GCC厚度的独立相关因素。 ROC及AUC分析提示：杯盘比AUC值最大( AUC=0.936;95%CI=0.903~0.964),其次为上方 RNFL 厚度( AUC=0.910;95%CI=0.889~9.455),诊断价值高,盘周鼻侧,下方,颞侧RNFL厚度以及黄斑上方,下方平均GCC厚度AUC值均大于0.8,具有较好的诊断价值。
　　结论：POAG患者盘周RNFL厚度与黄斑GCC厚度均明显变薄,变薄的盘周RNFL厚度与黄斑GCC厚度与POAG诊断存在相关性。盘周RNFL厚度与黄斑GCC厚度均有较好的诊断价值。     

Logistic regression analysis for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography.

PURPOSES: The purposes of this study are to investigate the diagnostic performance of logistic regression analysis (LRA) applied to multidimensional information on glaucoma disease and to determine the area under receiver operator characteristic curves (AROCs) for differentiating between normal and glaucomatous eyes in the Taiwan Chinese population based on the summary data from the Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). METHODS: One randomly selected eye from each of the 89 patients with glaucoma and from each of the 88 age- and gender-matched normal individuals were included in the study. Nine glaucomatous eyes and eight normal eyes were excluded as a result of poor OCT scans. Finally, 80 normal eyes and 80 glaucomatous eyes (mean deviation, -4.5 +/- 4.12 dB) were analyzed. The whole dataset was split into four equal sets. Each set combines 20 patients with glaucoma and 20 normal individuals. Fourfold crossvalidation was conducted. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic nerve head were measured by Stratus OCT in each patient. Twenty-five OCT parameters were included in a LRA method to determine the best combination of parameters for discriminating between glaucomatous and healthy eyes based on AROCs. RESULTS: With the LRA method, the AROC for glaucoma detection was 0.911 with sensitivity at 80% and 90% specificity were 83.7% and 80.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the OCT-provided parameters, the LRA method improved the ability to differentiate between normal and glaucomatous eyes in the Taiwan Chinese population.     

Glaucoma detection using different Stratus optical coherence tomography protocols

PURPOSE: To examine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness measurements using different Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanning protocols. METHODS: Stratus OCT data for 90 healthy subjects and 62 glaucoma patients with mild or moderate visual field loss were prospectively collected and analysed using four RNFL thickness protocols that differed in terms of image resolution and number of scans. Cut-off levels corrected for age and refractive error were defined by reference values derived from an independent normal database. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for average RNFL thickness for the full circle scan, and for the quadrant and clock hour circle scan sectors at p < 5% and p < 1% cut-off values. RESULTS: Regular- and high-resolution images performed equally well, and single best-quality scans were as good as the average of three scans to distinguish between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Full circle RNFL thickness yielded similar or better diagnostic accuracy than that of sectors. Sensitivities ranged from 84% to 87% and specificities from 89% to 93% for full circle RNFL thickness at the p < 5% cut-off level. CONCLUSIONS: The abilities of four different Stratus OCT RNFL thickness protocols to distinguish between eyes with predominantly mild glaucomatous field loss and healthy eyes were very similar. Thus diagnostic accuracy did not differ between high- and regular-resolution protocols, nor between global (full circle) and localized (sector) OCT parameters, which suggests a diffuse component in early glaucomatous RNFL damage.