Bond strength of three dental porcelains to Ni-Cr and Co-Cr-Ti alloys

Ceramometal bond strength has played an important role for the replacement of gold alloys by nickel-chromium alloys in dentistry. This study evaluated the metal/porcelain bond strength of three ceramic systems (Vita VMK 88, Williams and Duceram) associated with three nickel-chromium alloys (Durabond, Lite Cast B and Resistal P) and one experimental cobalt-chromium-titanium alloy. Thirty cast cylinder specimens (15 mm in height; 6 mm in diameter) were obtained for each alloy, in away that 10 specimens of each alloy were tested with each porcelain. Bond strength was measured with an Emic screw-driven mechanical testing machine by applying parallel shear forces to the specimens until fracture. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis of the alloy/ceramic combinations (p<0.05). Resistal P/Duceram had significantly higher bond strength (44.38+/-9.12 MPa) (p<0.05) than the other combinations, except for Co-Cr-Ti alloy/Vita VMK 88 (38.41+/-12.64 MPa). The association of the experimental Co-Cr-Ti alloy with Williams porcelain had significantly higher bond strength (28.20+/-3.86 MPa) than the combination of other alloys with the same porcelain (p<0.05). Based of these results and within the limitations of an in vitro study, it may be concluded that the bond strength of the three ceramic systems to the Ni-Cr and Co-Cr-Ti alloys varied significantly, indicating that metal/ceramic compatibility was very important to the bond strength.     

The Effect of Recasting on Bond Strength between Porcelain and Base‐Metal Alloys

Purpose: Long‐term success of metal ceramic restorations depends on metal ceramic bond strength. The purpose of this study was to determine whether recasting of base‐metal alloys has any effect on metal ceramic bond strength. Materials and Methods: Super Cast and Verabond base‐metal alloys were used to cast 260 wax patterns. The alloy specimens were equally divided into five groups and cast as: group A 0.0%, B 25%, C 50%, D 75%, and E 100% once‐cast alloy. Each group was divided into two subgroups: the first group was cast with Super Cast and the second with Verabond. In each subgroup half of the cast alloys were veneered with Vita VMK 68 and the others with Ceramco 3. Results: Recasting decreased bond strength (p < 0.006) when used for 50% once‐cast alloy. Group E with 100% new Super Cast alloy veneered with Vita VMK 68 porcelain had the highest bond strength (30.75 ± 9.58 MPa), and group B including 25% new and 75% recast Super Cast alloy veneered with the same porcelain had the lowest bond strength (21.72 ± 5.19 MPa). Conclusions: By adding over 50% once‐cast alloy in base‐metal alloys, metal‐ceramic bond strength decreases significantly.     

Shear bond strength between metal alloy and a ceramic system, submitted to different thermocycling immersion times

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of Co-Cr and Ni-Cr metal alloys and a specific ceramic, submitted to different thermocycling immersion times. Sixty metal-ceramic specimens were confectioned and standardized in cylindricalformat. Three thermocycling conditions were evaluated: without thermocycling, 3,000 cycles (5 degrees C/55 degrees C+/-1) with 30s of immersion time and 3,000 cycles (5 degrees C/55 degrees C+/-1) with 60s. The shear bond strength was performed in a universal testing machine, using a special device to concentrate the tension at the metal/ceramic interface during the test. The load was applied until fracture of the specimens. The data was statistically analyzed by ANOVA (two-way) and Tukey (p<0.05) test. The results didn't show significant statistic differences between the metal-porcelain combinations. Nevertheless, both metal-ceramic systems submitted to 60s of immersion time showed lower values compared to specimens without thermocycling. It was concluded that the thermocycling immersion time of 1 minute affect the shear bond strength values for the Ni-Cr/porcelain and Cr-Co/porcelain systems.     

Comparison of the bond strength of laser-sintered and cast base metal dental alloys to porcelain

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strengths of cast Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloys and the laser-sintered Co-Cr alloy to dental porcelain. METHODS: Dental porcelain was applied on two cast and one laser-sintered base metal alloy. Ten specimens were prepared for each group for bond strength comparison. ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD multiple comparison test (alpha=0.05) was used for statistical analysis. Fractured specimens were observed with a stereomicroscope to classify the type of failure after shear bond testing. RESULTS: While the mean shear bond strength was highest for the cast Ni-Cr metal-ceramic specimens (81.6+/-14.6MPa), the bond strength was not significantly different (P>0.05) from that for the cast Co-Cr metal-ceramic specimens (72.9+/-14.3MPa) and the laser-sintered Co-Cr metal-ceramic specimens (67.0+/-14.9MPa). All metal-ceramic specimens prepared from cast Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloys exhibit a mixed mode of cohesive and adhesive failure, whereas five of the metal-ceramic specimens prepared from the laser-sintered Co-Cr alloy exhibited the mixed failure mode and five specimens exhibited adhesive failure in the porcelain. CONCLUSIONS: The new laser-sintering technique for Co-Cr alloy appears promising for dental applications, but additional studies of properties of the laser-sintered alloy and fit of castings prepared by this new technique are needed before its acceptance into dental laboratory practice. SIGNIFICANCE: Laser sintering of Co-Cr alloy seems to be an alternative technique to conventional casting of dental alloys for porcelain fused to metal restorations.     

Comparative study of ceramic-to-metal bonding

Dentists and technicians have used dental ceramics associated with different types of alloys without taking into account the characteristics of compatibility of these materials. Knowing the properties of the alloy and ceramic used in metal/ceramic restorations is a key factor for treatment success. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of a palladium-silver alloy (Pors-on 4) to 3 ceramics (Ceramco, Noritake and Vita VMK-68) using shear forces at the metal-ceramic interface. A stainless steel cylindrical matrix was used for preparation of the metal dies, application of ceramic and shear strength testing. Thirty palladium-silver alloy cylinders received two layers of opaque and two layers of body porcelain, and shear tests were performed in a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Shear bond strength means (in MPa) were: 28.21(Ceramco), 28.96 (Noritake) and 24.11 (Vita VMK-68). One-way ANOVA did not show statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among the materials. The results of this study indicate that the three evaluated ceramic systems are suitable to be used in combination with the tested palladium-silver alloy.     

Interfacial shear bond strength between different base metal alloys and five low fusing feldspathic ceramic systems

This study compared the bond strength between metal alloys and 5 ceramic systems. Ceramic systems (Vita VMK68, Ivoclar IPSd. SIGN, Ceramco II, Matchmaker and Finesse) were fired onto either Ni-Cr or Co-Cr base metal alloy. Metal-ceramic interfaces were subjected to shear loading until failure. The ceramic type significantly affected the bond strength results (p<0.05). For Ni-Cr alloy, the results ranged between 15.4-25.3 MPa and for Co-Cr alloy between 13.3-19.0 MPa. The highest mean bond strength value was obtained with the combination of Ni-Cr alloy-Ceramco II (25.3 MPa), the lowest bond strength was received from the combination of Co-Cr alloy-Ivoclar IPS d.SIGN ceramic (13.3 MPa). Adhesive failures between metal and ceramic were significantly more frequent with Ni-Cr alloy (31 out of 50) than with Co-Cr (20 out of 50) (p<0.05). Ceramco II presented the highest bond strength with both Ni-Cr and Co-Cr being significantly different from one another.     

Shear bond strength of aesthetic materials bonded to Ni-Cr alloy

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the shear bond strength of four materials used as aesthetic material bonded to Ni-Cr alloy. METHODS: Sixty-eight alloy discs were prepared and divided equally into four groups, and received four treatments for veneering: conventional feldspathic porcelain (Noritake EX-3) and three light-cured prosthodontic composite resins (Artglass, Solidex and Targis). The aesthetic materials were applied after metal structure conditioning in accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 7 days. A universal testing machine was used to measure the shear bond strength of the specimens at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fractured specimens were examined by using both optical and scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The analysis of variance and Tukey's test showed that the strongest mean shear bond was obtained with Noritake EX-3 (mean shear bond strength 42.90+/-7.82 MPa). For composites, the highest mean shear bond strength was observed for Targis (12.30+/-1.57 MPa); followed by Solidex (11.94+/-1.04 MPa) and Artglass (10.04+/-0.75 MPa). Optical analysis of the fractured surfaces indicated that for Targis and Noritake EX-3 all failures were a mixture of both cohesive and adhesive patterns. As for Artglass and Solidex, the fractures were mainly adhesive in nature. CONCLUSIONS: The Solidex system was equivalent to the Targis system in bond strength and exhibited greater strength than the Artglass system. The porcelain fused-to-metal showed considerably higher shear bond strength than the three metal-resin bonding techniques.     

Evaluation of low-fusing ceramic systems combined with titanium grades II and V by bending test and scanning electron microscopy

The bond strength by three point bending strength of two metal substrates (commercially pure titanium or grade II, and Ti-6Al-4V alloy or grade V) combined to three distinct low-fusing ceramic systems (LFC) and the nature of porcelain-metal fracture by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were evaluated. The results were compared to a combination of palladium-silver (Pd-Ag) alloy and conventional porcelain (Duceram VMK68). Sixty metal strips measuring 25x3x0.5mm were made - 30 of titanium grade II and 30 of titanium grade V, with application of the following types of porcelain: Vita Titankeramik, Triceram or Duceratin (10 specimens for each porcelain). The porcelains were bonded to the strips with dimensions limited to 8x3x1mm. The control group consisted of ten specimens Pd-Ag alloy/Duceram VMK68 porcelain. Statistical analyses were made by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test at 5% significance level. Results showed that the bond strength in control group (48.0MPa ± 4.0) was significantly higher than the Ti grade II (26.7MPa ± 4.1) and Ti grade V (25.2MPa ± 2.2) combinations. When Duceratin porcelain was applied in both substrates, Ti grade II and Ti grade V, the results were significantly lower than in Ti grade II/Vitatitankeramik. SEM analysis indicated a predominance of adhesive fractures for the groups Ti grade II and Ti grade V, and cohesive fracture for control group Pd-Ag/Duceram. Control group showed the best bond strength compared to the groups that employed LFC. Among LFC, the worst results were obtained when Duceratin porcelain was used in both substrates. SEM confirmed the results of three point bending strength.     

自制镍铬烤瓷合金剪切结合强度的比较研究

目的探讨镍铬烤瓷合金中添加钛（Ti）、稀土金属以及不含铍（Be）对金瓷结合性能的影响。方法选用中国科学院金属研究所研制的镍铬烤瓷合金,按照是否含铍和稀土金属分为3个实验组（R1、R2、R3组）;以HI BONDNi-Cr烤瓷合金作为对照组（R4组）。对金瓷结合试件行剪切结合强度测试和金瓷界面的扫描电镜观察与能谱分析。结果R1、R2、R3、R4组剪切结合强度间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。扫描电镜观察金瓷界面形貌可见,合金与瓷紧密接触,无裂缝。各组界面元素种类接近。结论自制镍铬烤瓷合金的金瓷结合良好,剪切结合强度可以达到临床应用的要求。在镍铬烤瓷合金中加入Ti和稀土金属且不含Be可作为临床使用的更好推荐。     

��ͬ���ײ���������ɽ����ʵ���о�

目的比较不同基底材料与饰面瓷的结合力,为修复临床选择不同的瓷修复体提出依据。方法 2009年11月至2010年5月在大连市口腔医院应用特制模具制作基底材料标本蜡型(直径6mm,高8mm)共60个。根据各基底材料制作要求分别制作镍铬(Ni-Cr)合金、钴铬(Co-Cr)合金、金钯(Au-Pd)合金、混合Au-Pd合金、压铸瓷及氧化锆基底材料标本(每组10个)。在实验标本的一端堆瓷,瓷层总厚度控制在(2.0±0.01)mm。在万能试验机上以0.5mm/min的加载速度进行加载至剪切断裂。对实验标本的剪切强度进行单因素方差分析。结果 6种瓷修复体的的剪切强度为:Au-Pd合金组(51.56±8.93)MPa,Ni-Cr合金组(45.61±3.11)MPa,Co-Cr合金组(37.12±4.08)MPa,混合金钯合金组(36.07±5.42)MPa,氧化锆组(31.52±7.45)MPa,压铸瓷组(29.62±9.97)MPa。单因素方差分析表明不同金属合金基底材料与饰面瓷间的剪切强度差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论不同基底材料与饰面瓷的剪切强度存在差异。Au-Pd合金和Ni-Cr合金与饰面瓷结合力强。     

CORRELATION BETWEEN METAL-CERAMIC BOND STRENGTH AND COEFFICIENT OF LINEAR THERMAL EXPANSION DIFFERENCE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the metal-ceramic bond strength (MCBS) of 6 metal-ceramic pairs (2 Ni-Cr alloys and 1 Pd-Ag alloy with 2 dental ceramics) and correlate the MCBS values with the differences between the coefficients of linear thermal expansion (CTEs) of the metals and ceramics. Verabond (VB) Ni-Cr-Be alloy, Verabond II (VB2), Ni-Cr alloy, Pors-on 4 (P), Pd-Ag alloy, and IPS (I) and Duceram (D) ceramics were used for the MCBS test and dilatometric test. Forty-eight ceramic rings were built around metallic rods (3.0 mm in diameter and 70.0 mm in length) made from the evaluated alloys. The rods were subsequently embedded in gypsum cast in order to perform a tensile load test, which enabled calculating the CMBS. Five specimens (2.0 mm in diameter and 12.0 mm in length) of each material were made for the dilatometric test. The chromel-alumel thermocouple required for the test was welded into the metal test specimens and inserted into the ceramics. ANOVA and Tukey''s test revealed significant differences (p=0.01) for the MCBS test results (MPa), with PI showing higher MCBS (67.72) than the other pairs, which did not present any significant differences. The CTE (10^-6 °C^-1) differences were: VBI (0.54), VBD (1.33), VB2I (-0.14), VB2D (0.63), PI (1.84) and PD (2.62). Pearson''s correlation test (r=0.17) was performed to evaluate of correlation between MCBS and CTE differences. Within the limitations of this study and based on the obtained results, there was no correlation between MCBS and CTE differences for the evaluated metal-ceramic pairs.     

Evaluation of the castability of a Co-Cr-Mo-W alloy varying the investing technique

The purpose of this study was to compare the castability of Co-Cr-Mo-W (Remanium 2000), Ni-Cr (Durabond) and Co-Cr-Mo (Vera PDI) alloys invested with either conventional (phosphate- and silica-based) or mixed investing techniques. A 10 X 10 mm square-shaped nylon net containing 100 open squares served as a template for construction of wax patterns, which were invested with phosphate-based investment (Termocast), silica-based investment (Refrafil) and mixed investing technique (2-mm layer phosphate investment plus filling with silica investment). Forty-five cast specimens (5 per experimental condition) were obtained and sandblasted with aluminum oxide. The number of completely reproduced cast segments was counted to obtain a percentage designated "castability value", which indicated the accuracy of the alloy to reproduce mold details. Statistical analysis using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test showed that, comparing the alloys, Remanium 2000 had statistically similar castability (p>0.05) to Vera PDI and lower than Durabond (p<0.05). Considering the mixed technique results, Remanium 2000 yielded lower castability value (p<0.05) than Durabond and Vera PDI alloys, which showed similar results to each other (p>0.05). In conclusion, the castability of the Co-Cr-Mo-W alloy (Remanium 2000) was comparable to that of the Co-Cr alloy (Vera PDI) and worse than that of the Ni-Cr alloy (Durabond). Except for Remanium 2000, the mixed investing technique considerably improved the accuracy of the alloys to reproduce cast details, compared to the phosphate-based investment. The mixed investing technique appears as a viable alternative to improve castability of base metal alloys without decreasing the surface quality of the metallic pieces.     

RG实验低熔瓷与钛的结合性能分析

目的　测试作者自行研制的RG实验低熔瓷与钛的结合性能。方法　铸造 1 0mm×5mm× 1 4mm钛片 5个 ,于钛片表面依次熔附RG实验遮色瓷和牙本质瓷总厚度 1mm。采用扫描电镜观察钛瓷界面形貌并做能谱分析。采用铸造法制备 2 8mm× 3mm× 0 5mm的NiCr合金试件6个 ,纯钛试件 1 8个。于NiCr合金试件中份 8mm× 3mm处熔附 1mmVita常用瓷 ;钛试件分为 3组 ,每组 6个 ,于试件中份 8mm× 3mm处分别熔附 1mmRG实验低熔瓷、VITATITANKERAMLK瓷和NoritakesuperporcelainTi 2 2瓷。在实验机上采用 3点弯曲法测试金瓷分离时的载荷。采用金瓷修复体制作方法制作RG实验钛瓷冠。结果　扫描电镜观察发现遮色瓷与钛之间无明显缝隙存在 ,遮色瓷与钛之间存在一个约 1 μm过渡层 ,能谱分析发现该过渡层的主要化学元素为Ti、Si、O。NiCr合金 VITA瓷试件的分离加载为 (1 2 733± 3 2 97)N ,钛 VITATITAN、钛 Noritake瓷试件和钛 RG实验瓷的分离加载分别为 (7 2 33± 2 539)N、(5 533± 1 1 99)N和 (6 31 6± 1 433)N。经统计检验 ,3种钛瓷试件之间差异无显著性 (P >0 0 5) ;而 3种钛瓷样本的分离加载均明显低于NiCr合金与瓷的分离载荷 ,差异有极显著性 (P <0 0 1 )。钛瓷冠瓷面完整无裂纹。结论　RG瓷与钛具有良好的结合     

镍铬钛烤瓷金瓷剪切结合强度的测试

目的通过对自制镍铬钛（Ni-Cr-Ti）烤瓷合金与Vita常用瓷的剪切结合强度的测试,探讨镍铬烤瓷合金添加钛、混合稀土金属以及不含铍（Be）对金瓷结合性能的影响。方法使用中国科学院金属研究所研制的镍铬钛烤瓷合金,共分3个试验组,各组成分略有差异,以HI BOND非贵金属烤瓷合金为对照组,所有试件在万能试验机上采用剪切力试验测试金瓷分离时的载荷。结果3个实验组剪切强度值依次为R1组（28.1864±2.80702）MPa,R2组（26.1585±3.38148）MPa,R3组（25.1663±3.12508）MPa,对照组为（29.1436±3.28302）MPa。通过单向方差分析和SNK检验,各组之间差异均无显著性意义（P〉0.05）。结论自制镍铬钛烤瓷合金的金瓷结合良好,剪切结合强度可以达到临床应用的要求。     

Shear bond strengths of a ceramic system to alternative metal alloys

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The success of metal-ceramic restorations is influenced by the compatibility between base metal alloys and porcelains. Although porcelain manufacturers recommend their own metal systems as the most compatible for fabricating metal-ceramic prostheses, a number of alloys have been used. Purpose This study evaluated the shear bond strength between a porcelain system and 4 alternative alloys. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two Ni-Cr alloys: 4 ALL and Wiron 99, and 2 Co-Cr alloys: IPS d.SIGN 20 and Argeloy NP were selected for this study. The porcelain (IPS d.Sign porcelain system) portion of the cylindrical metal-ceramic specimens was 4 mm thick and 4 mm high; the metal portion was machined to 4x4 mm, with a base that was 5 mm thick and 1 mm high. Forty-four specimens were prepared (n=11). Ten specimens from each group were subjected to a shear load on a universal testing machine using a 1 mm/min crosshead speed. One specimen from each group was observed with a scanning electron microscope. Stress at failure (MPa) was determined. The data were analyzed with a 1-way analysis of variance (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The groups, all including IPS d.Sign porcelain, presented the following mean bond strengths (+/-SD) in MPa: 4 ALL, 54.0+/-20.0; Wiron, 63.0+/-13.5; IPS d.SIGN 20, 71.7+/-19.2; Argeloy NP, 55.2+/-13.5. No significant differences were found among the shear bond strength values for the metal-ceramic specimens tested. CONCLUSION: None of the base metal alloys studied demonstrated superior bond strength to the porcelain tested.     

Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of different metal alloys and porcelains in the metal-ceramic complex

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Color matching between natural teeth, shade guides, and metal-ceramic restorations is a common clinical problem. Difficulties related to color matching arise from structural differences that exist between metal-ceramic crowns and natural teeth, the limited range of available ceramic shades, inadequate shade guides, different types of metal alloys, and varying compositions of ceramic materials. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of various metal alloys and 2 porcelains on the final color of metal-ceramic complex. Material and methods Four commercial alloys for metal-ceramic restorations, a Ni-Cr (Thermobond), a Co-Cr (Wirobond), a Pd-rich noble (Cerapal-2), and a high noble Au-alloy (V-Delta) were combined with 2 porcelains (Vita Omega and Ceramco Silver) in metal-ceramic specimens with a standardized thickness of layers. Five disc-shaped (10 x 1 mm) specimens were prepared for each alloy/porcelain combination. Only opaque and dentin layers were applied (shade A3). The specimens were analyzed with a spectrophotometer, and data were obtained in the CIE Lab color system. The recorded data were analyzed with a 2-way multiple analysis of variance , a pair-wise comparison of group means (Student's t test), and finally, a categorical regression analysis of variance (CATREG) (alpha=.01). RESULTS: The types of alloy substrate and overlying porcelain significantly affected the color (P < .01). Au and Co-Cr alloys were found to be brighter (higher L* values) than the Ni-Cr and the Pd alloys ( P <.01, SE 0.239). Ceramco porcelain was found to be most red (higher a* values) of all tested alloys ( P <.01). Gold and Pd alloys caused a yellow shift to the metal-ceramic color compared to the Ni-Cr and the Co-Cr alloys with both porcelains ( P < .01, SE 0.165). The detected color differences were visually perceptible for some alloy-porcelain combinations. CONCLUSIONS: The final color of metal ceramic specimens was influenced both from the type of alloy substructure and from the type of overlying porcelain.     

The influence of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy on the final shade of low-fusing porcelain

AIMS: The aims of this study were to investigate the influence of commercially pure titanium (PTi) and titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloys (TiA) on the final shade of low-fusing porcelain bonded to them and to compare the shade changes with those of three conventional metal-ceramic systems. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A titanium casting unit was used to cast PTi and Ti-6Al-4V alloy specimens followed by A3 shade low-fusing porcelain (Noritake) being bonded to them. Gold-based (AuA), palladium-based (PdA), and nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) alloys were cast with an automatic centrifugal casting machine, then A3 shade conventional porcelain material (Vita, VMK 95) was applied to them. Ten specimens of each metal were then fabricated. The CIE L* a* b* color coordinates of the specimens were measured with a spectrophotometer. RESULTS: All alloys had significant color changes when compared with A3 shade tabs. The color differences from the shade tabs were 5.79 for the Ti-6Al-4V group, 6.46 for PdA alloy, 8.12 for AuA alloy, 8.15 for Ni-Cr alloy, and 12.58 for PTi. The specimens differed from the shade tabs primarily because of the differences in a* and b* coordinate values. CONCLUSIONS: Predictable shade reproduction of metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs) may be impaired by the underlying metal. The PTi had the greatest color differences among all the tested metal when compared with the shade tabs, whereas the Ti-6Al-4V alloy had the lowest. PTi is more likely to affect the final shade of low-fusing porcelain than Ti-6Al-4V alloy.     

镍铬合金、钴铬合金和纯钛金瓷结合强度的比较

目的比较镍铬合金、钴铬合金和纯钛的金瓷结合强度和金瓷界面特征。方法执行ISO9693[1]标准,采用三点弯曲试验分别测定在常规热处理条件下的镍铬合金、钴铬合金和纯钛的金瓷结合强度。运用扫描电镜和X射线衍射进行金瓷界面分析。结果金瓷结合强度分别为:镍铬合金:(37.56±2.92)Mpa,钴铬合金:(39.06±2.79)Mpa,纯钛:(32.61±5.62)Mpa,前两者组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),后者与前两者组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。扫描电镜和X线衍射:镍铬合金和钴铬合金与瓷之间紧密接触,无裂纹,界面过渡层15～20μm。纯钛与瓷过渡层80μm,可见孔洞。纯钛基体表面可见约2μm黑色带。结论①钴铬合金与镍铬合金的金瓷结合强度接近,都大于纯钛的金瓷结合强度。②钴铬合金、镍铬合金、纯钛的金瓷结合强度都大于25Mpa,按ISO9693标准均可应用于临床。③金瓷之间存在结合介质,形成过渡层。     

冷热循环对两种表面进行瓷修补强度影响的研究

目的：探讨模拟口内冷热循环刺激对两种表面瓷修补树脂粘结强度的影响。方法：分别制作20个镍铬合金试件和烤瓷试件,采用Clearfil Repair瓷修补系统进行粘接修复。镍铬合金试件随机分A、B组,烤瓷试件随机分C、D组。B、D组经5000次冷热循环（5℃和55℃）。测定各组试件的剪切粘接强度,观察断裂模式。结果：剪切强度C、D组显著高于A、B组,A组显著高于B组,C、D组间无显著性差异。断裂模式：A、B组全部表现为粘结破坏,C、D组主要为发生于瓷层内的内聚破坏,少数为混合破坏。扫描电镜观察：冷热循环后,树脂-金属断裂面的树脂残留明显减少,树脂-瓷断裂面仍见明显树脂突及瓷层折裂。结论：树脂-瓷的粘接强度显著高于树脂-金属的粘接强度,模拟口内冷热循环刺激对树脂-金属的粘结强度具有显著性影响。