Update on the evaluation and management of functional dyspepsia

Dyspepsia affects up to 40 percent of adults each year and is often diagnosed as functional (nonulcer) dyspepsia. The defining symptoms are postprandial fullness, early satiation, or epigastric pain or burning in the absence of causative structural disease. These symptoms may coexist with symptoms of functional gastrointestinal disorders, such as gastroesophageal reflux and irritable bowel syndrome, as well as anxiety and depression. The history and physical examination can help identify other possible causes of the symptoms. Warning signs of serious disease, such as cancer, are unintended weight loss, progressive dysphagia, persistent vomiting, evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding, and a family history of cancer. In these cases, more extensive laboratory investigation, imaging, and endoscopy should be considered as clinically indicated. During the initial evaluation, a test-and-treat strategy to identify and eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection is more effective than empiric treatment and more cost-effective than initial endoscopy. Eradication of H. pylori helps one out of 15 patients with functional dyspepsia diagnosed by endoscopy, but may not be cost-effective. Treatment options that may be beneficial for functional dyspepsia include histamine H2 blockers, proton pump inhibitors, and prokinetic agents. Although psychotropic medications and psychological interventions have no proven benefit in patients with functional dyspepsia, they are appropriate for treating common psychiatric comorbidities.     

Management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori is the cause of most peptic ulcer disease and a primary risk factor for gastric cancer. Eradication of the organism results in ulcer healing and reduces the risk of ulcer recurrence and complications. Testing and treatment have no clear value in patients with documented nonulcer dyspepsia; however, a test-and-treat strategy is recommended but for patients with undifferentiated dyspepsia who have not undergone endoscopy. In the office setting, initial serology testing is practical and affordable, with endoscopy reserved for use in patients with alarm symptoms for ulcer complications or cancer, or those who do not respond to treatment. Treatment involves 10- to 14-day multidrug regimens including antibiotics and acid suppressants, combined with education about avoidance of other ulcer-causing factors and the need for close follow-up. Follow-up testing (i.e., urea breath or stool antigen test) is recommended for patients who do not respond to therapy or those with a history of ulcer complications or cancer.     

Campylobacter gastritis and associated disorders

Our review of evidence that Campylobacter pylori is an important factor in gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and "nonulcer dyspepsia" suggests that C pylori is the most common cause of chronic active gastritis. The association between C pylori gastritis and duodenal ulcer, which approaches 100%, leads to the suggestion that this infection plays an important role in the pathogenesis of duodenal ulcer. Evidence supporting a central role in the pathogenesis of gastric ulcer and nonulcer dyspepsia is less compelling.     

Some perspectives on peptic ulcer

In this article, the author comments on the following topics: whether peptic ulcer is a disease or just the sign of another process; whether the crater has a multifactorial origin; the ubiquity of Helicobacter pylori and the conclusion that a specific strain will doubtless prove to be the cause of some, but not all, ulcers; the inherent definitional problem of "nonulcer dyspepsia"; and the controversy over how much gastric acid needs to be reduced to speed the healing of peptic ulcer.     

Ulcer and gastritis

The literature on peptic ulcer and gastritis in 2000 again focused on the topics of Helicobacter pylori, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and gastric cancer. New diagnostic tests for H. pylori infection have been evaluated, and rescue therapies for failed H. pylori eradication have been tested. The causal relationship between H. pylori infection and nonulcer dyspepsia, gastric cancer, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and NSAID-related ulcers remained heated topics of debate. In 2000, landmark clinical trials and meta-analyses were published addressing these issues. The role of endoscopy in managing nonulcer dyspepsia was better defined. The role of H. pylori eradication in NSAID/aspirin users was reexamined in high-risk patients. Clinical benefit was finally confirmed for specific inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). The millennium year turned out to be a very important one in the advancement of knowledge in this field.     

Update on Helicobacter pylori treatment

One half of the world's population has Helicobacter pylori infection, with an estimated prevalence of 30 percent in North America. Although it is unclear whether eradication of H. pylori improves symptoms in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia, there is strong evidence that eradication of this bacteria improves healing and reduces the risk of recurrence or rebleeding in patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer. A "test-and-treat" strategy is recommended for most patients with undifferentiated dyspepsia. With this approach, patients undergo a noninvasive test for H. pylori infection and, if positive, are treated with eradication therapy. This strategy reduces the need for antisecretory medications as well as the number of endoscopies. The urea breath test or stool antigen test is recommended. Until recently, the recommended duration of therapy for H. pylori eradication was 10 to 14 days. Shorter courses of treatment (i.e., one to five days) have demonstrated eradication rates of 89 to 95 percent with the potential for greater patient compliance. A one-day treatment course consists of bismuth subsalicylate, amoxicillin, and metronidazole, all given four times with a one-time dose of lansoprazole. In children with documented H. pylori infection, however, all regimens should continue to be prescribed for seven to 14 days until short-course treatment is studied and its effectiveness has been established in this population.     

Helicobacter pylori: why it still matters in 2005

Despite falling prevalence rates in the developed world, H pylori is still present in the United States and is particularly prevalent among racial minorities and recent immigrants. H pylori infection is clearly associated with an increased risk of peptic ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and MALT lymphoma, and it is associated with some cases of uninvestigated dyspepsia. Identification and eradication of H pylori improves outcomes in patients with peptic ulcer disease and causes tumor regression in patients with MALT lymphoma. It is uncertain whether H pylori eradication will improve outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Decision analytic models suggest that a test-and-treat strategy for H pylori is rational and cost-effective for patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia.     

Recognizing peptic ulcer disease. Keys to clinical and laboratory diagnosis

An algorithmic approach to evaluation of dyspepsia or abdominal discomfort begins with differentiation between peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease as well as recognition of alarm signs and symptoms for gastric cancer, which are indications for early endoscopy. In the absence of alarm symptoms, most patients should undergo noninvasive testing for H pylori infection with a serologic, urea breath, or stool antigen test. Factors to consider in selection of appropriate testing include reliability, specificity, sensitivity, cost, and local access and expertise. As a general rule, physicians should choose a test that has the best accuracy for the level of testing expertise available. The basic principle underlying testing for H pylori is that patients should not undergo testing unless the physician is willing to treat on the basis of a positive test result. In patients who receive treatment, confirmation of cure is important for preventing further morbidity and reducing risk of transmission of infection.     

Helicobacter pylori: aggressor or innocent bystander?

Helicobacter pylori seeks gastric mucosa, whether found in the stomach, duodenum, or Barrett's esophagus. Definitive diagnosis can be secured by appropriate stains of mucosal biopsies and culture, but the rapid urease test, breath isotope studies, and serologic testing are also useful. The frequency of colonization increases with advancing age, but infection occurs earlier in underdeveloped countries. Although the reservoir is uncertain, water or food transmission seems likely. There is sufficient evidence to assign an etiologic role to the bacteria in the causation of type B antral gastritis. H. pylori is found in areas of gastric metaplasia within the duodenum and is associated with duodenitis. Although acute infection leads to hypochlorhydria, chronic colonization has little effect on acid secretion. Studies have thus far failed to establish a convincing relationship between H. pylori and nonulcer dyspepsia, although the bacteria may play a role in selected patients. H. pylori is found in association with most idiopathic gastric and duodenal ulcers, but it is unclear as to whether the bacteria plays a causative or permissive role. The organism has a predilection for intercellular spaces and the mucous layer, thus affording relative isolation from luminally active antibiotics. Monotherapy with bismuth preparations transiently eliminates the bacteria, but recolonization is rapid, probably due to regrowth of sequestered organisms. A combination of metronidazole, bismuth, and tetracycline (or amoxicillin) affords the best eradication rate, but the potential side effects of this program should be considered. The present therapy of duodenal ulcer disease is effective and without significant risk. Treatment of H. pylori should be reserved for those patients who relapse on adequate maintenance therapy. If a safe and effective antibiotic becomes available, more frequent testing and earlier treatment intervention may become more attractive. H. pylori is probably an "innocent bystander" for most patients, but the bacteria may sufficiently impair the defenses of the antral and duodenal mucosa to facilitate the development and relapse of ulcer disease in subsets of patients.     

Efficacy of omeprazole plus two antimicrobials for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a Turkish population.

Omeprazole combined with 2 antimicrobials has been suggested as a first-line option for Helicobacter pylori eradication in recent years. However, controversy exists regarding the efficacy of this protocol. This open-label, prospective clinical study investigated the efficacy of omeprazole-based triple therapy for H pylori eradication in 518 patients with H pylori-positive functional dyspepsia with or without duodenal ulcer. Amoxicillin, macrolides (clarithromycin or roxithromycin), and nitroimidazoles (metronidazole, ornidazole, or tinidazole) were the antibiotics used in the study. Nonulcer patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 8 different treatment protocols and duodenal ulcer patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different treatment protocols consisting of omeprazole (20 mg once daily for nonulcer patients, 20 mg twice daily for ulcer patients for 14 days) with a combination of 2 of the above antimicrobials (for 10 days). H pylori infection was assessed by histologic findings and a rapid urease test before therapy and 4 weeks after therapy ended. Four hundred fifty-nine patients completed their regimens; 327 had functional dyspepsia (180 men, 147 women; median age, 39 years; range, 18 to 70 years) and 132 had ulcers (81 men, 51 women; median age, 40 years; range, 18 to 70 years). Eradication of H pylori was achieved in 58.8% (270 of 459) of all patients, 58.1% (190 of 327) of nonulcer dyspeptic patients, and 60.6% (80 of 132) of duodenal ulcer patients. The eradication rate varied from 47.2% to 69.4% in different treatment protocols. There were no statistically significant differences in eradication rates in any treatment group. All drugs were generally well tolerated in all groups, and no patient discontinued treatment because of side effects. Therapy with omeprazole and 2 antimicrobials for H pylori had limited efficacy in a Turkish population. The reason for these results, which conflict with those of other studies, is not clear. Further investigations of regimens for the eradication of H pylori in our population are necessary.     

Role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of peptic ulcer in NSAID users

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) are independent risk factors for peptic ulcers and ulcer complications and they have additive or synergistic effects. A meta-analysis showed that the OR for the incidence of peptic ulcer was 61.1 in patients infected with H. pylori and also taking NSAID when compared to patients uninfected with H. pylori and not taking NSAID. H. pylori eradication may prevent NSAID-induced ulcers in NSAID naive patients. In patients receiving long-term NSAID, proton pump inhibitor(PPI) is more effective in the prevention of ulcer recurrence and bleeding. However, H. pylori eradication should be considered in patients receiving long -term PPI maintenance treatment to prevent the development of corpus gastritis and gastric atrophy.     

Long-term management of peptic ulcer disease

Maintenance therapy to reduce the risk of ulcer relapse and subsequent ulcer complications should be offered to patients who are likely to suffer a relapse by virtue of their past history or current risk factors. The most effective form of ulcer maintenance therapy appears to be continuous low-dose nocturnal therapy with H2-receptor antagonists. Patients who are observed expectantly and develop recurrent ulcer symptoms can be treated with full-strength therapy on an intermittent basis. Patients with a definite seasonal trend to their ulcer disease may benefit from a seasonal approach to therapy. Ulcer surgery is reserved for patients with ulcer complications or severe symptoms unresponsive to standard maintenance therapy. Just how long continuous low-dose maintenance therapy can or should be continued remains unclear. Whether ulcer disease is ever truly cured (never to recur again), as suggested by pre-endoscopic studies, is a matter of conjecture. Nevertheless, the use of maintenance-dose therapy appears to be safe over relatively long periods of time, and it appears that cumulative ulcer relapse rates decline with continued use of such therapy. The risk of recurrent symptoms, hemorrhage, and other complications is also reduced by maintenance therapy, and the economic aspects of ulcer disease are influenced in a positive fashion by these regimens. The role that C. pylori will ultimately play in the etiology and pathogenesis of peptic ulcers and their relapse is still not known with any certainty, although it appears to represent an important marker (if not an important pathogenetic cause) for ulcer disease. As such, it may be considered a risk factor to be eliminated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pathogenesis of gastric and duodenal ulcer in the elderly

In the elderly, H. pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug(NSAID) use are most important risk factors for peptic ulcer disease. It is now recognized that, in patients with H. pylori infection, nonatrophic antral-predominant gastritis results in increased acid secretion, which is seen in duodenal ulcer patients, whereas corpus-predominant gastritis and pangastritis result in decreased acid secretion, that are seen in patients with proximal gastric ulcer and gastric cancer. These physiological changes are considered to be related to disease outcome. On the other hand, NSAIDs induced gastrointestinal toxicity is primarily due to the inhibition of mucosal prostaglandin synthesis in the gastric mucosa, which subsequently impairs the gastric cytoprotective factors. These two factors may independently, or even synergistically, cause the development of peptic ulcer disease in the elderly.     

Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori--Maastricht III-2005 and Japanese guidelines

The guidelines on the management of Helicobacter pylori were updated at the European Helicobacter study group third Maastricht consensus conference in March 2005. Especially, this conference emphasis on the management of non ulcer dyspepsia, GERD, and the patients who use non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Eradication of H. pylori is recommended in patients with peptic ulcer, low grade MALT lymphoma, atrophic gastritis, unexplained iron deficiency anemia, chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and first degree relatives of patients with gastric cancer. H. pylori eradication is less effective than proton pomp inhibitor(PPI) treatment in preventing ulcer recurrence in long term NSAIDs users. This meeting also emphasized on the relationship between H. pylori and gastric cancer. The guideline concluded that H. pylori eradication has the potential to reduce the risk of gastric cancer development. Japanese guideline in 2003 does not mention the effect of eradication for prevention of gastric cancer. The H. pylori eradication and new strategy should be desirable for global strategy of gastric cancer prevention.     

The course of peptic ulcer disease

Peptic ulcer disease usually has periodic exacerbations and remissions. Pain can disappear without total healing of the ulcer crater and can be absent when an ulcer is present. Changes in the incidence of ulcer disease have been noted in recent years. Genetic predisposition, infection with H. pylori, and the use of anti-inflammatory drugs are involved in causation. Stress; the use of alcohol, tobacco and caffeine; and other diseases have been implicated as etiologic factors. Ulcer pain has a recognizable pattern, but the symptoms can be variable, particularly in older people and in patients taking ulcerogenic medications. The familiar complications of hemorrhage, perforation, and obstruction still occur, and nonulcer dyspepsia has not been fully explained. Duodenal ulcers have a disturbing tendency to return; new therapeutic approaches offer hope.     

Indication of H. pylori eradication therapy

In the guideline, for H. pylori the Japanese Society of Helicobacter published diagnosis and treatment in July 2000. Only peptic ulcers and low grade MALT lymphomas are recommended as an indication of H. pylori eradication and other diseases such as atrophic gastritis, post EMR state for early gastric cancer and post-operated stomach due to gastric cancer, hyperplastic polyps and non-ulcer dyspepsia, were not included. In addition, Japanese social security foundation approves only peptic ulcers for indication of H. pylori eradication treatment. However, eradication therapy for atrophic gastritis should be considered in aspect of decreasing gastric cancer risk. Since accumulated epidemiological, experimental and clinical data strongly support its positive correlation with cancer risk, patients in high risk group for gastric cancer should be included for a target eradication therapy. Indication of the treatment should be expanded to histological gastritis caused by H. pylori in our country, where prevalence of gastric cancer is very high.     

Guidelines in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan--in comparison with the guidelines published in other countries

Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) is a causative agent for chronic gastritis and is an important risk factor for peptic ulcers, gastric carcinomas, and gastric MALT lymphomas. In 2000, the Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research published a guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection for physicians in routine medical practice. In this guideline, H. pylori eradication therapy is recommended in gastric or duodenal ulcer patients. H. pylori eradication is also recommended in gastric MALT lymphoma patients but the guideline says it should be done at specialist institutions. Considering the high prevalence of gastric carcinomas in Japan. H. pylori eradication for the prevention of gastric carcinomas should be discussed urgently.     

Future for basic and clinical studies on peptic ulcer disease

Since the discovery of H. pylori, various causes of peptic ulcer disease is reevaluated, and only four factors are now considered most important; H. pylori infection, gastric acid, NSAID administration, and mental and physical stress. Among them, gastric acid is an aggravating factor, and gastric acid alone can hardly develop peptic ulcers. The relationship between H. pylori infection and stress has been studied at Hanshin-Awaji great earthquake occurred in 1995. Immediately after the earthquake, the number of patients with peptic ulcer disease has been greatly increased, and those patients were considered to be typical cases of stress ulcers. Interestingly, however, it was found that 83.2% of the patients were infected with H. pylori. The data suggested that stress ulcer developed in those infected with H. pylori. In contrast, the relationship between H. pylori infection and NSAID in the development of ulcer disease is more complex. It is still unclear whether H. pylori infection is an additive effect for development of peptic ulcer disease by NSAID administration or not.     

Peptic ulcer disease

Peptic ulcer disease is a common gastrointestinal disease whose management and treatment has changed dramatically over the last 25 years. Treatment of peptic ulcer disease has evolved from dietary modifications and antacids to gastric acid suppression with H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors to eradication of Helicobactor pylori infection. Treatment of patients infected with H pylori using antibiotics has changed the natural history of peptic ulcer disease. As a result of H pylori treatment and other unknown factors ulcer disease is declining and complications from ulcer disease have diminished significantly.