Intracoronary imaging in addition to coronary angiography for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: More information for better care?

About 70% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are related to an ischaemic heart disease in Western countries. Percutaneous coronary intervention has been shown to improve the prognosis of survivors when an unstable coronary lesion is identified as the potential cause of the cardiac arrest. Acute complete coronary occlusion is often demonstrated among patients with ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram after the return of spontaneous circulation. In patients without ST-segment elevation, routine coronary angiography has been shown to be not superior to conservative management. However, an electrocardiogram-based decision to perform immediate coronary angiography could be insufficient to identify unstable coronary lesions, which are frequently associated with intermediate coronary stenosis. Intracoronary imaging can be helpful to detect plaque rupture or erosion and intracoronary thrombus, but could also lead to better stent implantation, and help to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis. In patients with coronary lesions without the instability characteristic, conservative management should be the default strategy, and a search for another cause of the cardiac arrest should be systematic. In the present review, we sought to describe the potential benefit of intracoronary imaging in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.     

Deleterious synergistic effects of acute heart failure and diabetes mellitus in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Data from the FAST-MI Registries

Central Illustration: Characteristics of the study population and 5-year survival according to the presence or absence of DM and/or early AHF.

     

Unsupervised clustering of patients with severe aortic stenosis: A myocardial continuum

BackgroundTraditional statistics, based on prediction models with a limited number of prespecified variables, are probably not adequate to provide an appropriate classification of a condition that is as heterogeneous as aortic stenosis (AS).AimsTo investigate a new classification system for severe AS using phenomapping.MethodsConsecutive patients from a referral centre (training cohort) who met the echocardiographic definition of an aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 1 cm² were included. Clinical, laboratory and imaging continuous variables were entered into an agglomerative hierarchical clustering model to separate patients into phenogroups. Individuals from an external validation cohort were then assigned to these original clusters using the K nearest neighbour (KNN) function and their 5-year survival was compared after adjustment for aortic valve replacement (AVR) as a time-dependent covariable.ResultsIn total, 613 patients were initially recruited, with a mean ± standard deviation AVA of 0.72 ± 0.17 cm². Twenty-six variables were entered into the model to generate a specific heatmap. Penalized model-based clustering identified four phenogroups (A, B, C and D), of which phenogroups B and D tended to include smaller, older women and larger, older men, respectively. The application of supervised algorithms to the validation cohort (n = 1303) yielded the same clusters, showing incremental cardiac remodelling from phenogroup A to phenogroup D. According to this myocardial continuum, there was a stepwise increase in overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio for phenogroup D vs A 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.46–3.26; P < 0.001).ConclusionsArtificial intelligence re-emphasizes the significance of cardiac remodelling in the prognosis of patients with severe AS and highlights AS not only as an isolated valvular condition, but also a global disease.     

Management and long-term outcomes of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases experiencing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: The SCALIM registry

BackgroundPatients with chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs) are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. However, the prognostic impact of CID after an acute coronary event has been poorly studied.AimsTo examine the effect of history of CID on long-term outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).MethodsWe analysed data from SCALIM, a regional registry that prospectively enrolled patients with STEMI between June 2011 and May 2019. The presence of CID (including inflammatory bowel diseases, rheumatic conditions, inflammatory skin diseases, multiple sclerosis, vasculitis and autoimmune diseases) was identified. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, peripheral vascular events and rehospitalization for cardiovascular conditions.ResultsData from 1941 patients with STEMI (mean age 64.8 ± 14.1 years, 75.1% men) were analyzed. The prevalence of any CID was 4.6% (n = 89). After a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 2.6 years, the overall death rate was 16.2%, with similar 5-year survival between patients with and without CID (74.2% vs. 81.9%, respectively; P = 0.121), with no significant mortality excess (hazard ratio: 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.73 ? 1.82; P = 0.55). However, among CID patients, 35 (39.3%) were on corticosteroid therapy and showed decreased 5-year survival (52.8% vs. 89.5% without corticosteroids; P = 0.001). We found no increased rate of secondary endpoints, except for peripheral vascular events (5-year survival free of peripheral events: 93.3% vs. 98.6% in those without CID; P = 0.005).ConclusionsApproximately 1 in 20 patients with STEMI has CID. We found no effect of CID on long-term survival. However, patients on corticosteroid therapy appeared to have higher rates of death during follow-up. Whether this finding is related to the use of corticosteroids or to the more progressive nature of their condition warrants further investigation.     

Predictive factors for long-term mortality in miscellaneous cardiogenic shock: Protective role of beta-blockers at admission

1. Download : Download high-res image (72KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

On- Versus Off-Hours Presentation and Mortality of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

ObjectivesThe authors sought to assess the association between admission time with patient’s care, procedure characteristics, and clinical outcomes within a contemporary ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) network of patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).BackgroundThe effect of admission time on STEMI patient's outcomes remains controversial when primary PCI is the preferred reperfusion strategy.MethodsCharacteristics and clinical outcomes of 2,167 consecutive STEMI patients admitted in a tertiary PCI-capable center were collected. On-hours were defined as admission from Monday through Friday between 8 am and 6 pm and off-hours as admission during night shift, weekend, and nonworking holidays. In-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality were assessed as well as key time delays.ResultsA total of 1,048 patients (48.3%) were admitted during on-hours, and 1,119 patients (51.7%) during off-hours. Characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups, including rates of cardiac arrest (7.9% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.55) and cardiogenic shock (12.3% vs. 14.7%; p = 0.16). Median symptom-to-first medical contact time and median first medical contact-to-sheath insertion time did not differ according to on- versus off-hours admission (120 min vs. 126 min; p = 0.25 and 90 min vs. 93 min; p = 0.58, respectively), as well as the rate of radial access for catheterization (85.6% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.27). There was no association between on- versus off-hours groups and in-hospital (8.1% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.49) or 1-year mortality (11.0% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.89), respectively.ConclusionsIn a contemporary organized STEMI network, patients admitted in a high-volume tertiary primary PCI center during on-hours or off-hours had similar management and 1-year outcomes.     

Prevalence of liver fibrosis in an unselected general population with high prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Time for screening?

IntroductionCirrhosis and liver cancer are currently common causes of death worldwide. The global epidemic of obesity has increased the incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cirrhosis in recent years. Advanced fibrosis increases the morbimortality rate in NAFLD. The Mexican population has one of the highest prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM) worldwide.AimTo determine the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis in Mexican general population.MethodsAdult individuals, without a history of liver disease nor heavy alcohol consumption were randomly sampled from 20,919 participants of a health and nutrition survey applied to the general population. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed to calculate the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) (an extensively validated non-invasive method). Two cut-off points were used. Advanced fibrosis was defined as a result >0.676.ResultsIn total 695 individuals were included. The mean age was 47.8 ± 16.4. The majority were between 20 and 50 years (59%), 70.2% were female, 35.5% showed obesity and 15.8% DM. The 93% had normal serum ALT. Based on the NFS results, 56 individuals (8.1%) had a high probability of fibrosis. Most patients from this subgroup showed normal serum ALT (92.9%), 89.3% were >45 yr. old, 52% were obese and 27% suffered from DM.ConclusionsBased on these results, 8.1% of Mexican general population without a history of liver disease is at high risk of having advanced liver fibrosis and complications and death derived from cardiovascular disease and cirrhosis. Most of them showed normal ALT serum levels.