Safe and cost‐effective control of post‐transplantation recurrence of hepatitis B

A combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NUC) is the current standard of care for controlling hepatitis B recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, long‐term HBIG administration is associated with several unresolved issues, including limited availability and extremely high cost, and thus several protocols for treatment with low‐dose HBIG combined with NUC or HBIG‐free regimens have been developed. This article reviews recent advances in post‐OLT hepatitis B virus (HBV) control and future methodological directions. New NUC such as entecavir, tenofovir or lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil combinations induce a very low frequency of viral resistance. The withdrawal of HBIG after several months of OLT under new NUC continuation also has permissible effects. Even after HBV reactivation, NUC can usually achieve viral control when viral markers are strictly followed up. Another approach is to induce self‐producing anti‐HBV antibodies via vaccination with a hepatitis B surface antigen vaccine. However, HBV vaccination is not sufficiently effective in patients to treat liver cirrhosis type B after OLT because immune tolerance to the virus has already continued for several decades. Trials of its safety and cost‐effectiveness are required. This review advocates a safe and economical approach to controlling post‐OLT HBV recurrence.     

Aggressive Epstein‐Barr virus‐negative B‐cell post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in a hepatitis C‐negative liver transplant recipient who received a hepatitis C‐positive graft: Implications for D+/R− hepatitis C virus seroconversion

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an uncommon, but well‐described complication after liver transplantation. Most recently, Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been implicated in the development of PTLD. A HCV‐negative 62‐year‐old man with autoimmune hepatitis received a HCV nucleic acid amplification test‐positive liver graft from a 73‐year‐old brain‐dead donor (D+/R?). After his recovery from the operation, the patient was treated for HCV and achieved an undetectable viral load. He was readmitted 6 months after transplant with a spontaneous perisplenic hematoma, weight loss, failure to thrive, low‐grade fevers, and abnormal liver function tests. He had a rapid clinical deterioration and expired shortly after admission. His liver biopsy demonstrated EBV‐negative monomorphic B‐cell PTLD. Our case is the first to report an aggressive early‐onset EBV‐negative monomorphic B‐cell PTLD in a HCV D+/R? liver transplant. This case illustrates the paucity of knowledge on HCV seroconversion and its involvement in EBV‐negative monomorphic B‐cell PTLD development.     

Innovative technologies for point‐of‐care testing of viral hepatitis in low‐resource and decentralized settings

According to the Global Burden of Diseases, chronic viral hepatitis B and C are one of the most challenging global health conditions that rank among the first causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Low‐ and middle‐income countries are particularly affected by the health burden associated with HBV or HCV infection. One major gap in efficiently addressing the issue of viral hepatitis is universal screening. However, the costs and chronic lack of human resources for using traditional screening strategies based on serology and molecular biology preclude any scaling‐up. Point‐of‐care tests have been deemed a powerful potential solution to fill the current diagnostics gap in low‐resource and decentralized settings. Despite high interest resulting from their development in recent years, very few point‐of‐care devices have reached the market. Scaling down and automating all testing steps in 1 single device (eg, sample preparation, detection and readout) is indeed challenging. But innovations in multiple disciplines such as nanotechnologies, microfluidics, biosensors and synthetic biology have led to the creation of chip‐sized laboratory systems called “lab‐on‐a‐chip” devices. This review aims to explain how these innovations can overcome technological barriers that usually arise for each testing step while developing integrated point‐of‐care tests. Point‐of‐care test prototypes rarely meet the requirements for mass production, which also hinders their large‐scale production. In addition to logistical hurdles, legal and economic constraints specific to the commercialization of in vitro diagnostics, which have also participated in the low transfer of innovative point‐of‐care tests to the field, are discussed.     

Molecular characteristics of non‐cancerous liver tissue in non‐B non‐C hepatocellular carcinoma

Although chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most important risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide, the proportion of HCC patients negative for the hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C antibody, so‐called “non‐B non‐C HCC”, is rapidly increasing, especially in Japan. The background liver diseases of non‐B non‐C HCC patients can be multifactorial, including occult HBV infection and non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis. It is reasonable to investigate the non‐cancerous liver tissues to identify the potential molecular mechanisms responsible for the processes of hepatocarcinogenesis of non‐B non‐C HCC. However, to date, only a few studies have focused on this research concept based on the idea of “field cancerization”. This review highlights the potential importance of the molecular analysis of non‐cancerous liver tissues to clarify the molecular characteristics in patients with non‐B non‐C HCC. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the individual predisposition to non‐B non‐C HCC will lead to improvements in the prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of this neoplastic disease.     

Factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody in HIV‐positive patients: impact of compromised immunity

Summary. In regions that are hyperendemic for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, prevalence of and risk factors associated with isolated anti‐hepatitis B core antibody (anti‐HBc) in HIV‐positive patients are less well described. HIV‐positive patients who were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti‐hepatitis B surface antibody (anti‐HBs) and anti‐HBc at designated hospitals for HIV care in Taiwan were included for analysis. HBV DNA was detected by real‐time polymerase chain reaction in patients with and without isolated anti‐HBc. Of 2351 HIV‐positive patients, 450 (19.1%) were HBsAg positive, 411 (17.5%) were anti‐HBc positive alone and 963 (41.0%) for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc. Compared with patients who were positive for both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc, patients with isolated anti‐HBc were older, less likely to have anti‐hepatitis C virus antibody (anti‐HCV), had lower CD4 lymphocyte counts and higher plasma HIV RNA loads. Older age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–1.043) and CD4 <100 cells/μL (adjusted odds ratio, 1.524; 95% confidence interval, 1.025–2.265) were independently associated with isolated anti‐HBc by logistic regression, while presence of anti‐HCV and injecting drug use were not. HBV DNA was detectable in 8.3% of 277 patients with isolated anti‐HBc and 14.3% of 56 patients with both anti‐HBs and anti‐HBc (P = 0.160). In a country hyperendemic for HBV infection, HIV‐positive patients at older age and with CD4 <100 cells/μL were more likely to have isolated anti‐HBc, suggesting that compromised immunity plays a role in the presence of this marker.     

2‐Amino‐N‐(2,6‐dichloropyridin‐3‐yl)acetamide derivatives as a novel class of HBV capsid assembly inhibitor

Capsid structure is crucial for the maturation and maintenance of the stable hepatitis B virion. Therefore, chemicals that inhibit capsid assembly might potentially act as potent antiviral compounds. However, only a few chemicals are known to block the capsid assembly process and further viral proliferation. In this study, we present a novel family of capsid assembly inhibitors that act against hepatitis B virus (HBV). Based on X‐ray crystallographic data of the HBV core protein (Cp), we built dimer and hexamer structural models to be used in library searches. Several chemicals in the 2‐amino‐N‐(2,6‐dichloropyridin‐3‐yl)acetamide family were predicted to have high affinity for the groove structure in Cp. Using in vitro assembly and the HepG2.2.15 cell culture test, we verified that these chemicals demonstrated inhibitory effects on capsid assembly. Furthermore, we investigated the combinatorial effects of these assembly inhibitor chemicals with lamivudine and revealed that, in combination, they have synergistic inhibitory effects on decreasing viral concentration. We propose that these inhibitors could be utilized as an effective combination treatment against HBV infection.     

A systematic review and meta‐analysis of adjuvant interferon therapy after curative treatment for patients with viral hepatitis‐related hepatocellular carcinoma

The efficacy of adjuvant interferon treatment for the management of patients with viral hepatitis‐related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following curative treatment is controversial. We have conducted a systematic review with meta‐analysis to assess the effects of adjuvant interferon therapy on survival outcomes. Randomized and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) comparing adjuvant interferon treatment with the standard of care for viral hepatitis‐related HCC after curative treatment were included. CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE and the Science Citation Index were searched with complementary manual searches. The primary outcomes were recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Nine randomized trials and 13 NRSs were included in the meta‐analysis. These nine randomized trials included 942 participants, of whom, 490 were randomized to the adjuvant interferon treatment group and 452 to the control group. The results of meta‐analysis showed unexplained heterogeneity for both RFS and OS. The 13 NRSs included 2214 participants, of whom, 493 were assigned to the adjuvant interferon treatment group and 1721 to the control group. The results of meta‐analysis showed that, compared with controls, adjuvant interferon treatment significantly improved the RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52–0.84, I² = 29%] and OS (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.34–0.56, I² = 0%) of patients with hepatitis C virus‐related HCC following curative treatment. There was little evidence for beneficial effects on patients with hepatitis B virus‐related HCC. Future research should be aimed at clarifying whether the effects of adjuvant interferon therapy are more prominent in hepatitis C patients with sustained virological responses.     

Hepatitis B virus‐related hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of antiviral therapy: The emerging role of non‐viral risk factors

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the major malignant lethal tumours, is most prevalent in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Both viral and non‐viral factors contribute to the development of HCC. It is established that viral factors associated with HBV DNA level, HBV genotype, designated gene mutation, HBV DNA integration, HBx protein, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) and HBV RNA are correlated with hepatocarcinogenesis. Before the introduction of antiviral therapy, viral factors once attracted more attention during the development of HCC. With the widespread use of antiviral therapy, predominantly nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), most patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have achieved sustained viral control. The role of non‐viral factors, especially modifiable factors, is anticipated to be reinforced in the future. Herein, we reviewed the modifiable non‐viral risk factors of HBV‐related HCC, in the hope of providing substantial evidence for further development of novel precautionary measures for HCC. In addition, the therapeutic interventions for reducing the risk of HCC, like potential conventional pharmaceutical interventions and lifestyle modification are also discussed in this review. Future studies that would explore the specific mechanism of HBV‐related HCC development in patients with satisfactory viral control and related precision treatment are warranted.     

Hepatitis B virus genotype and basal core promoter/precore mutations are associated with hepatitis B‐related acute‐on‐chronic liver failure without pre‐existing liver cirrhosis

Summary. The study was undertaken to investigate the features and clinical implications of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes, basal core promoter (BCP) and precore (PC) mutations in hepatitis B‐related acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (HB‐ACLF). Samples from 75 patients with HB‐ACLF and without pre‐existing liver cirrhosis and 328 age‐matched patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were analyzed. HBV genotype and BCP/PC mutations were determined by direct sequencing. Mutations at 8 sites of the BCP/PC region were compared between the two groups of patients. A significantly higher ratio of genotype B to C was found in patients with HB‐ACLF than in patients with CHB (30.7–69.3%vs16.5–82.6%, P < 0.01). Single mutations including T1753V (C/A/G), A1762T, G1764A, G1896A and G1899A and triple mutations T1753V/A1762T/G1764A and A1762T/G1764A/C1766T (or T1768A) were more frequently detected in patients with HB‐ACLF than in patients with CHB. Correspondingly, BCP/PC wild‐type sequences were absent in patients with HB‐ACLF in contrast to 27.1% in patients with CHB. The BCP/PC mutations were found to be associated with increased HBeAg negativity, higher alanine aminotransferase level and lower viral load. Patients with HB‐ACLF infected with the PC mutant virus had a higher mortality. The findings suggest that patients with CHB infected with genotype B with BCP/PC mutations were more likely to develop HB‐ACLF than those with genotype C with wild‐type BCP/PC regions, and patients with HB‐ACLF with the PC mutation had increased risk of a fatal outcome.     

Community‐based,point‐of‐care hepatitis C testing: perspectives and preferences of people who inject drugs

A barrier to hepatitis C treatment for people who inject drugs (PWID) is needing to attend multiple appointments for diagnosis. Point‐of‐care hepatitis C tests provide results within 20 to 105 minutes and can be offered opportunistically in nonclinical settings such as needle syringe programmes. In this nested qualitative study, we explored the acceptability of point‐of‐care testing for PWID. PWID attending participating needle syringe programmes were screened using the OraQuick HCV antibody mouth swab (result in 20 minutes); those with a reactive result then underwent venepuncture for a point‐of‐care RNA test: the Xpert HCV Viral Load (result in 105 minutes). Convenience sampling was used to select participants for a semi‐structured interview. A hybrid thematic analysis was performed, guided by Sekhon's “Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.” Nineteen participants were interviewed. Three core themes emerged: "people and place," "method of specimen collection," and "rapidity of result return." It was highly acceptable to be offered testing at the needle syringeprogrammes by nurses and community health workers, who were described as competent and nonjudgemental. Most participants reported that even if a finger‐stick point‐of‐care RNA test were an option in the future, they would prefer venepuncture, as the sample could be used for pre‐treatment workup and bundled testing. Waiting 20 minutes to receive the antibody test result was acceptable, whereas the 105 minutes required for the RNA result was unacceptable. Offering point‐of‐care hepatitis C testing at needle syringe programmes is acceptable to PWID, however tests that avoid venepuncture are not necessarily the most attractive to PWID.     

Systematic analysis of funding awarded for viral hepatitis‐related research to institutions in the United Kingdom, 1997–2010

Viral hepatitis is responsible for great health, social and economic burden both globally and in the UK. This study aimed to assess the research funding awarded to UK institutions for viral hepatitis research and the relationship of funded research to clinical and public health burden of viral hepatitis. Databases and websites were systematically searched for information on infectious disease research studies funded for the period 1997–2010. Studies specifically related to viral hepatitis research were identified and categorized in terms of funding by pathogen, disease and by a research and development value chain describing the type of science. The overall data set included 6165 studies (total investment £2.6 billion) of which £76.9 million (3.0%) was directed towards viral hepatitis across 323 studies (5.2%). By pathogen, there were four studies specifically investigating hepatitis A (£3.8 million), 69 studies for hepatitis B (21.4%) with total investment of £14.7 million (19.1%) and 236 (73.1%) hepatitis C studies (£62.7 million, 81.5%). There were 4 studies investigating hepatitis G, and none specifying hepatitis D or E. By associated area, viral hepatitis and therapeutics research received £17.0 million, vaccinology £3.1 million and diagnostics £2.9 million. Preclinical research received £50.3 million (65.4%) across 173 studies, whilst implementation and operational research received £19.4 million (25.3%) across 128 studies. The UK is engaged in much hepatology research, but there are areas where the burden is great and may require greater focus, such as hepatitis E, development of a vaccine for hepatitis C, and further research into hepatitis‐associated cancers. Private sector data, and funding information from other countries, would also be useful in priority setting.     

Icteric acute hepatitis E with no response of immunoglobulin M class anti‐hepatitis E virus antibody

A 68‐year‐old Japanese man developed icteric acute hepatitis during periodic care after undergoing gastrectomy due to early gastric cancer. The routine serological markers for hepatitis A, B and C viruses were all negative. Although the liver enzymes spontaneously recovered without any specific therapy, cholestasis was relatively prolonged and successfully treated with prednisolone. Determination of serum hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA revealed the transient infection of HEV, and both immunoglobulin (Ig)A and IgG class anti‐HEV antibodies were detected after the disease onset, whereas those were negative when measured 3 weeks prior to the onset. In addition, the titer of serum IgA class antibody was associated with the clinical signs of hepatitis. In contrast, no IgM class antibody was detected throughout the course. This case suggests that screening only with IgM class antibody is not sufficient to detect acute HEV infection.     

Studying the association of microRNA‐210 level with chronic hepatitis B progression

We studied the relationship between hypoxia and microRNA‐210 (miR‐210) levels, the miR‐210 levels in patients with hepatitis B and the roles of miR‐210 in liver inflammation. We used the concanavalin A (Con A) murine hepatitis model and inflammation, hypoxia and miR‐210 levels were examined. In these patients, we studied serum miR‐210 levels and clinical indexes related to hepatitis in 90 patients with different stages of chronic hepatitis B and 30 controls. Two functional assays of miR‐210 in vitro under hypoxic condition were conducted. The animal experiments indicated that the liver and serum miR‐210 levels significantly increased with liver hypoxia and inflammation. In humans, serum miR‐210 levels enhanced with hepatitis severity and were related to serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TB) and prothrombin activity (PTA) levels. The miR‐210 functional assays showed that miR‐210 elevation might be related to the decreases in HepG2.2.15 cell dehydrogenase activity and HBV replication under hypoxic conditions. Because the liver inflammation causes liver hypoxia which also results in liver and serum miR‐210 level elevation, the serum miR‐210 level may serve as a molecular biomarker for the severity of hepatitis and increases in liver miR‐210 that we see may be a response of hepatocytes to hypoxia during hepatitis progression.     

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B virus + hepatitis C virus‐co‐infected patients with compensated liver cirrhosis treated with ombitasvir,paritaprevir/r + dasabuvir + ribavirin

Hepatitis B virus may reactivate in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with direct‐acting antivirals. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV + hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐co‐infected patients with compensated liver cirrhosis treated with paritaprevir/ombitasvir/ritonavir, dasabuvir with ribavirin. We reviewed prospectively gathered data from a national cohort of 2070 hepatitis C virus patients with compensated liver cirrhosis who received reimbursed paritaprevir/ombitasvir/r, dasabuvir with ribavirin for 12 weeks from the Romanian National Health Agency during 2015‐2016. Twenty‐five patients in this cohort were HBs antigen positive (1.2%); 15 untreated with nucleotide analogues agreed to enter the study. These patients were followed up: ALT monthly, serology for HBV and DNA viral load at baseline, EOT and SVR at 12 weeks. Hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐co‐infected patients were all genotype 1b and 52% females, with a median age of 60 years (51 ÷ 74); 76% were pretreated with peginterferon + ribavirin; 72% were with severe necroinflammatory activity on FibroMax assessment; 40% presented comorbidities; and all were HBe antigen negative. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) SVR response rate was 100%. Hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐DNA viral load was undetectable in 7/15 (47%) before therapy, and for the other 8 patients, it varied between below 20 and 867 IU/mL. Five patients (33%) presented virological reactivation (>2 log increase in HBV‐DNA levels) during therapy. One patient presented with hepatitis associated with HBV reactivation, and two started anti‐HBV therapy with entecavir. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) virological reactivation was present in 33% in our patients. Generally, HBV‐DNA elevations were mild (<20 000 IU/mL); however, we report one case of hepatitis associated with HBV reactivation.     

Sequential therapy with entecavir and PEG‐INF in patients affected by chronic hepatitis B and high levels of HBV‐DNA with non‐D genotypes

Complete eradication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is rarely achieved. Treatment options include currently available nucleos(t)ide analogues and pegylated interferon. The aim of our exploratory study was to assess the effectiveness of sequential therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) vs the current standard of care. We evaluated an association with entecavir and pegylated interferon alfa‐2a (PEG‐IFN) in 20 patients with hepatitis B, high HBV viremia and genotypes A, B, C and E. Patients received entecavir alone for 12 weeks, then entecavir and PEG‐IFN for 12 weeks, lastly PEG‐IFN alone for 36 weeks. The results were compared with 20 patients (control group) treated in the past with 48 weeks of PEG‐IFN monotherapy. Our results show that complete sustained virological response (SVR) and partial SVR were, respectively, 60% and 80% in the study group and 10% and 30% in the control group; anti‐HBe seroconversion rate were 76.9% vs 15%, and anti‐HBs seroconversion were 20% vs 0%, respectively. We found a correlation among different genotypes and virological and serological outcomes – genotype C has a better virological response, while genotype A had a better serological response, and E genotype had a poor response. These results show that a sequential approach is a promising strategy of treatment in patients with CHB and high viremia in comparison with PEG‐IFN monotherapy. The E genotype seems to have the worse rate of response and requires other treatment strategies.     

Effect of hepatitis B virus on steatosis in hepatitis C virus co‐infected subjects: A multi‐centre study and systematic review

It remains unclear whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may modify the severity of viral steatosis in patients coinfected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). We examined the influence of coinfection with HBV on prevalence of steatosis in chronic hepatitis C in a multi‐centre cohort of HBV‐HCV subjects, and by performing a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature. We centrally and blindly assessed steatosis prevalence and severity in a cohort of HBV‐HCV coinfected subjects compared to HCV and HBV monoinfected controls and we performed a systematic review of studies addressing the prevalence of steatosis in HBV‐HCV subjects compared to HCV controls. In the clinical cohort, we included 85 HBV‐HCV, 69 HBV and 112 HCV subjects from 16 international centres. There was no significant difference in steatosis prevalence between the HBV‐HCV and the HCV groups (33% vs 45%, P = .11). In subgroup analysis, lean HBV‐HCV subjects with detectable HBV DNA had less steatosis than lean HCV subjects matched for HCV viremia (15% vs 45%, P = .02). Our literature search identified 5 additional studies included in a systematic review. Overall, prevalence of steatosis > 5% was similar in HBV‐HCV infection compared to HCV (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.53‐1.6) although there was significant heterogeneity (I² 69%, P = .007). In conclusion, although the prevalence of steatosis is similar in HBV‐HCV compared to HCV subjects, our analysis suggests that there may be an inhibitory effect of HCV‐induced steatogenesis by HBV in certain subgroups of patients.     

Serum Wisteria floribunda agglutinin‐positive Mac‐2‐binding protein for patients with chronic hepatitis B and C: a comparative study

We compared Wisteria floribunda agglutinin‐positive Mac‐2‐binding protein (WFA⁺‐M2BP) levels between patients with chronic hepatitis B (n=249) and chronic hepatitis C (n=386) based on the degree of liver fibrosis. We examined WFA⁺‐M2BP levels in patients with F4 (cirrhosis), F3 or more (advanced fibrosis) and F2 or more (significant fibrosis) in the two groups. We further examined the relationship between five fibrosis markers and the degree of fibrosis. The WFA⁺‐M2BP values ranged from 0.25 cut‐off index (COI) to 12.9 COI in patients with hepatitis B and 0.34–20.0 COI in patients with hepatitis C (P<.0001). The median WFA⁺‐M2BP values in F4 in the two groups were 2.83 COI in patients with hepatitis B and 5.03 COI in patients with hepatitis C (P=.0046). The median WFA⁺‐M2BP values in F3 or more in the two groups were 1.79 COI in patients with hepatitis B and 3.79 COI in patients with hepatitis C (P<.0001). The median WFA⁺‐M2BP values in F2 or more in the two groups were 1.49 COI in the hepatitis B cohort and 3.19 COI in the hepatitis C group (P<.0001). Among five liver fibrosis markers, WFA⁺‐M2BP had the highest correlation coefficient (r_s=.629) in terms of correlation with the degree of fibrosis in the patients with hepatitis C and had the second highest r_s value (.415) in the hepatitis B group. Although WFA⁺‐M2BP could be a useful indicator of liver fibrosis, WFA⁺‐M2BP levels in the two groups significantly differed even in the same degree of fibrosis. Individual cut‐off values in each aetiology for the degree of fibrosis should be determined.     

Screening Emergency Admissions at Risk of Chronic Hepatitis C (SEARCH) to diagnose or ‘re‐diagnose’ infections is effective in Australia

The World Health Organization has set ambitious viral hepatitis elimination targets; however, difficulties in identifying and engaging patients remain. The emergency visit is an opportunity for enhanced linkage to care (LTC). We assessed the effectiveness of an automated Emergency Department (ED) screening service in identifying patients with hepatitis C (HCV) and achieving LTC. A retrospective evaluation was undertaken, analysing the first 5000 patients screened through an automatic Australian service termed ‘Screening Emergency Admissions at Risk of Chronic Hepatitis’ (SEARCH). Screening was performed for those recommended in the Australian national testing policy, specifically overseas born (OB) and Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders (ATSI). Healthcare worker education, patient information materials and opt‐out informed consent were used to test sera already collected for biochemistry assays. 5000 of 5801 (86.2%) consecutive eligible patients were screened (OB: 4778, ATSI: 222) from 14 093 ED presentations. HCV antibody was positive in 181 patients (3.6%); 51 (1.0%) were HCV RNA positive. Of 51 HCV RNA–positive patients, 12 were new diagnoses, 32 were ‘re‐diagnoses’ (aware but lost to follow‐up [LTFU]), and 7 were previously known but treatment contraindicated. LTC was successful in 38 viraemic patients (7 deceased, 4 LTFU, 1 treatment ineligible and 1 declined). Of RNA‐negative patients, 75 were previously treated and 49 had presumed spontaneous clearance. Opt‐out consent was acceptable to all patients and staff involved. ED screening can lead to additional diagnosing and ‘re‐diagnosing’ of HCV, with high rates of LTC. Opt‐out consent and automation removed major obstacles to testing.     

Hepatitis B screening,prophylaxis and re‐activation in the era of rituximab‐based chemotherapy

Background: Hepatitis B re‐activation is a well‐described complication in patients with inactive chronic hepatitis B receiving chemotherapy. Screening for HBV and pre‐emptive therapy are recommended. However, the rates of HBV screening, prophylaxis and re‐activation during rituximab‐containing chemotherapy are unknown. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who received rituximab between August 1997 and September 2009. We evaluated patients for hepatitis B serologies, antiviral prophylaxis and hepatitis B re‐activation during or up to 6 months after chemotherapy. Results: One thousand four hundred and twenty‐nine patients underwent rituximab‐containing chemotherapy for NHL. Hepatitis B serologies were documented in 524 (36.6%) patients. Of these, 20 (3.8%) were HBsAg positive and 10 (50%) experienced HBV re‐activation. Only half (5/10) had HBV serology documented before re‐activation. Only 3/8 (37.5%) of patients with newly documented HBsAg positivity received antiviral prophylaxis. Virological breakthrough occurred in two of the patients on chronic therapy, in one of three inactive carriers on prophylaxis and in two of five patients not receiving prophylaxis. Re‐activation developed in another five patients not screened previously for hepatitis B. One patient developed ALF and died. Re‐activation did not occur in 25 patients with isolated positive core antibody. Conclusions: At tertiary care institutions hepatitis B serologies are infrequently assessed before rituximab‐based chemotherapy and prophylaxis is uncommon. Greater adherence to recommendations for screening and prophylaxis is necessary. This suboptimal screening rate could be even lower in community hospitals and could result in significant harm to unscreened and unprophylaxed patients.