Adenoviral vector-mediated gene transfer for human gene therapy

Human gene therapy promises to change the practice of medicine by treating the causes of disease rather than the symptoms. Since the first clinical trial made its debut ten years ago, there are over 400 approved protocols in the United States alone, most of which have failed to show convincing data of clinical efficacy. This setback is largely due to the lack of efficient and adequate gene transfer vehicles. With the recent progress in elucidating the molecular mechanisms of human diseases and the imminent arrival of the post genomic era, there are increasing numbers of therapeutic genes or targets that are available for gene therapy. Therefore, the urgency and need for efficacious gene therapies are greater than ever. Clearly, the current fundamental obstacle is to develop delivery vectors that exhibit high efficacy and specificity of gene transfer. Recombinant adenoviruses have provided a versatile system for gene expression studies and therapeutic applications. Of late, there has been a remarkable increase in adenoviral vector-based clinical trials. Recent endeavors in the development of recombinant adenoviral vectors have focused on modification of virus tropism, accommodation of larger genes, increase in stability and control of transgene expression, and down-modulation of host immune responses. These modifications and continued improvements in adenoviral vectors will provide a great opportunity for human gene therapy to live up to its enormous potential in the second decade.     

Apoptotic genes in cancer therapy

Induction of apoptosis in malignant cells is a major goal of cancer therapy in general and of certain cancer gene therapy strategies in particular. Numerous apoptosis-regulating genes have been evaluated for this purpose. Besides the most prominent p53 gene others include p16, p21, p27, E2F genes, FHIT, PTEN and CASPASE genes. Recently, the potential for therapy of an adenoviral gene, E1A, known for a long time for its apoptosis-inducing activity, has been discovered. In experimental settings, these genes have proven their tumor-suppressive and apoptosis-inducing activity. Clinical trials are currently being performed with selected genes. By far the most studies transfer the p53 gene using retro- or adenoviral vectors. Disease stabilization or other benefits were observed in a limited number of patients when p53 was applied alone or in combination with cytotoxic drugs. A second proapoptotic gene that has entered clinical trials is adenovirus E1A. Here, too, disease stabilization as well as/or local regression in one case have been demonstrated in selected patients. In all cases, side effects were tolerable. To further improve E1A as a therapeutic transgene, we have deleted transforming domains from the adenovirus 5 and 12 13S cDNAs. Mutants were derived which had completely lost their transforming activity in combination with the E1B oncogene but retained a pronounced tumor-suppressive activity. Cells transduced with these constructs showed a highly reduced ability to grow in soft agar, and tumor growth in nude mice could be substantially suppressed. Outgrowing tumors had lost E1A expression when analyzed in Western blots. These E1A constructs may represent valuable tools for cancer gene therapy in the future.     

Adenovirus as an integrating vector

Recombinant adenoviral vectors have served as one of the most efficient gene delivery vehicles in vivo thus far. Multiply attenuated or completely gutless adenoviral vectors have been developed to achieve long-term gene expression in animal models by overcoming cellular immunity against de novo synthesized adenoviral proteins. However, since adenovirus lacks native integration machinery, the goal of gene therapy obtaining permanent expression cannot be realized with current adenoviral vector systems. Recent studies have shown that replication-incompetent adenoviral vectors randomly integrate into host chromosomes at frequencies of 0.001-1% of infected cells. To improve the integration frequencies of adenoviral vectors, a variety of hybrid vectors combining the highly efficient DNA delivery of adenovirus with the integrating machinery of retroviruses, adeno-associated viruses, and transposons, have been emerging. These hybrid vectors have shown promise, at least in in vitro systems. Furthermore, adenoviral vectors have shown potential as gene targeting vectors. These developments should eventually lead to more effective gene therapy vectors that can transduce a myriad of cell types stably in vivo.     

Tissue-specific targeting for cardiovascular gene transfer. Potential vectors and future challenges

The introduction of genes to cardiovascular cells in vivo remains the major challenge for current gene therapy modalities. However, recent developments in retargeting adenoviral vectors are promising to improve transduction efficiency in the cardiovascular cells. After systemic application, most adenoviral vectors are trapped by the liver, hampering delivery to target cardiovascular tissues. Furthermore, a majority of vectors for vascular gene transfer utilizes strong heterologous viral promoters, such as CMV. A potential side effect related to the use of such vectors is the systemic organ toxicity resulting from unrestricted transgene expression. These vectors have the additional problem of being frequently shut-down in vivo. Therefore, both retargeting adenoviral vectors and the use of tissue-specific promoter-driven vectors offer an enhanced safety profile by reducing ectopic expression in vital organs including the liver and lung. However, the limiting factor for the use of tissue-specific promoters is the low-level of expression compared with their viral counterparts. Both the development of efficient and strong vectors using cell-specific regulatory elements and the production of therapeutic proteins at sufficient levels is urgently needed to inhibit vasculoproliferative disorders. This review will focus on some of the recent achievements in vector development relevant to the delivery of vascular gene therapies targeted to the vascular endothelium, smooth muscle cells and macrophages during arterial remodelling.     

Immune response to helper dependent adenoviral mediated liver gene therapy: challenges and prospects

Adenovirus-mediated gene therapy holds significant potential especially for applications requiring high levels of target tissue transduction. While significant advances in clinical adenoviral gene therapy applications have been made in cancer, the clinical translation of adenoviral gene replacement therapy for genetic disease has lagged. Encouragingly, advances in vector production have led to the development of Helper-Dependent ("gutted" or "high capacity") adenoviral vectors (HDV) deleted of all viral coding genes. HDV significantly reduces the chronic toxicity associated with early generation adenoviral vectors that has been most significant after systemic administration in both small and large animal models. However, the field remains confounded by innate immune responses inherent to adenovirus, and more generally, to the adaptive immune response to transgene. Together they decrease the effective therapeutic index for any particular treatment. This review summarizes the current advances toward understanding the decisive cell and molecular mechanisms underlying the acute toxicity to systemic HDV administration. We focus on the complex immune response and consequences of systemic vector delivery in the context of liver-directed monogenic disease therapy. Future development of interventions to avoid the innate immune response, including vector and pharmacologic manipulations, should further contribute to minimizing vector toxicity while maximizing the efficacy of systemic HDV gene transfer.     

Adenovirus-mediated p53 tumor suppressor gene therapy of osteosarcoma

The clinical outcome for osteosarcoma (OS) remains discouraging despite efforts to optimize treatment using conventional modalities including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Novel therapeutic approaches based on our expanding understanding of the mechanisms of tumor cell killing have the potential to alter this situation. Tumor suppressor gene therapy aims to restore the function of a tumor suppressor gene lost or functionally inactivated in cancer cells. One such molecule, the p53 tumor suppressor gene plays a critical role in safeguarding the integrity of the genome and preventing tumorigenesis. Introduction of wild-type (wt) p53 into transformed cells has been shown to be lethal for most cancer cells in vitro, but clinical trials of p53 gene replacement have had limited success. Analysis of these clinical trials highlighted the insufficient efficacy of current vectors and low proapoptotic activity of wt p53 as a single agent in vivo. In this review, a contemporary summarization of the current status of adenovirus-mediated p53 gene therapy of OS is presented. Advancement in our understanding of p53 tumor suppressor activity, the molecular biology of chemoresistant OS, and recent advances in tumor targeting with adenoviral vectors are also addressed. Based on these parameters, prospects for future investigations are proposed.     

Development of adenovirus serotype 35 as a gene transfer vector

While 51 human adenoviral serotypes have been identified to date, the vast majority of adenoviral vectors designed for gene transfer have been generated in the adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) backbone. Viral infections caused by Ad5 are endemic in most human populations and the majority of humans carry preexisting humoral and/or cellular immunity to Ad5 which may severely limit the use of Ad5-based vectors for gene therapy applications. To circumvent this preexisting Ad5 immunity, we have identified Ad35 as an alternative adenoviral serotype to which the majority of humans do not have neutralizing antibodies. Importantly, Ad35 can be grown to high titers with a low particle-to-PFU ratio. As a prerequisite for the development of Ad35 for use as a gene transfer vector, a genome organization map was constructed using the available Ad35 sequence information, and E1a-deficient Ad35 vectors encoding marker genes were generated. Ad35 biodistribution in mice was assessed following intravenous administration and compared with that of Ad5. Extremely low levels of Ad35 were detected in all organs evaluated, including liver, lung, spleen, and bone marrow, while Ad5 displayed high transduction of these organs. Due to the lack of Ad35 liver tropism, minimal hepatotoxicity was observed in mice treated with Ad35. Furthermore, the half-life of Ad35 in mouse blood was found to be two to three times longer than that of Ad5. These data suggest that either mice do not express the Ad35 cell surface receptor or that Ad35 does not efficiently transduce mouse cells in vivo following systemic delivery. Therefore, to begin to elucidate the Ad35 cell entry mechanisms, in vitro competition studies were performed. These data demonstrated that Ad35 cell entry is CAR independent, and may involve protein(s) expressed on most human cells.     

Molecular therapeutics of HBV

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a public health problem worldwide, particularly in East Asia. The current therapy of HBV infection is mostly based on chemical agents and cytokines that have been shown to provide limited efficacy and are also toxic to the human body. Gene therapy is a new therapeutic strategy against HBV infection, involving the transmission of gene drugs into liver cells by specific delivery systems and methods. Although this new anti-HBV infection technique is under active investigation, various promising anti-HBV viral gene drugs have been developed for gene therapy, including antisense RNA and DNA, hammerhead ribozymes, dominant negative HBV core mutants, single chain antibody, co-nuclease fusion protein, and antigen. In order to optimize their antiviral effects and/or enhance anti-HBV immunity, various novel gene delivery systems have also been developed to (specifically) deliver such DNA constructs into liver cells; some of them are viral vectors, such as adenoviral vectors, retroviral vectors and poxviral vectors, and even hepatitis B viral for its hepatocellular specificity. Others are non-viral vectors, in which naked DNA and liposomes are frequently used for DNA vaccine or nucleotide analogs for inhibiting HBV DNA polymerase. This review addresses various aspects of gene therapy for HBV infection, including gene drugs, delivery methods, animal model, and liver transplantation with combination therapy. It also discusses the problems that remain to be solved.     

Adenoviral vectors for gene replacement therapy

Adenovirus-based vectors are promising vehicles for gene replacement therapy due to their ability to efficiently transduce a wide variety of proliferating and non-proliferating cells. Over the past decade, different versions of adenoviral vectors (Ads) have been developed. These vectors can be classified into two major categories, based on whether the viral coding sequences are partially (first or second-generation Ads) or completely deleted (helper-dependent or gutted Ads). Both types of Ads have been tested in a variety of gene delivery studies, and major obstacles to their clinical application have been identified. Currently, innate and adaptive host immune responses to Ads remain major challenges, limiting both the initial viral dose and the effectiveness of subsequent administrations. Recent developments in vector design and delivery methods have improved the potential of Ads for successful gene therapy application.     

Recombinant adenovirus is an efficient and non-perturbing genetic vector for human dendritic cells

Recombinant adenoviral vectors have promise for human gene therapy because of efficient transgene expression in nondividing primary cell types. Dendritic cells (DC) have potential as adjuvants for immune therapy, since they are specialized to capture antigens to form MHC-peptide complexes, migrate to T cell areas in the lymph node, and activate T cells including CD4+ helpers and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). We show that several current chemical and physical transfection methods allow < 2 % of DC to express reporter genes but that recombinant adenoviruses, encoding the reporter genes green fluorescent protein and LacZ, efficiently transfect monocyte-derived human DC. Immature DC, generated with IL-4 and GM-CSF, are transfected to 95% efficiency, while mature DC show reduced transfection (50%) and gene expression. Adenovirus-transfected, immature DC exhibit several critical functions. The DC can differentiate in the presence of lipopolysaccharide or a monocyte-conditioned medium to express the surface markers of mature, T cell stimulatory DC including CD25, CD83, and high levels of CD86 and HLA-DR. Transfected DC can also secrete high levels of IL-12 and are potent inducers of T cell growth. Transgene expression in DC is stable for at least 6 days in the presence of the DC survival factor, TRANCE. Therefore adenoviral infection does not perturb the maturation and function of DC. The efficiency of adenoviral-mediated gene transfer prompts the evaluation of this vector in studies of DC biology, including the expression of antigens for active immune therapy.     

Comparison between recombinant baculo- and adenoviral-vectors as transfer system in cardiovascular cells

Summary. The development of effective gene-therapeutic applications for cardiovascular disorders is in part limited by the lack of appropriate delivery systems. In an attempt to overcome this deficiency, we investigated the ability of baculoviral vectors to transduce human cardiovascular cells, for which data are missing in literature. Additionally, baculovirus ability to transduce target cells was compared to that of an adenoviral vector, a well characterized and widely used viral vector. Transduction experiments, performed using baculo/adenoviral vectors expressing the enhanced green fluorescence protein, revealed that, under the experimental condition considered, baculoviruses but not adenoviruses efficiently transduce human coronary smooth muscle cells (hCSMC); an opposite behavior was noticed for human coronary endothelial cells (hCEC). Thus, baculoviral vectors are potentially indicated as transfer system in the treatment of coronary restenosis, where growth inhibitory genes should reach hCSMC but not hCEC. When used to transduce human cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, both vectors behaved similarly. Finally, studies on cellular DNA replication revealed a more prolonged and pronounced negative effect on cells transduced by adenoviral compared to baculoviral vectors. Our data indicate that baculoviruses represent an attractive alternative to adenoviruses as transfer vectors in cardiovascular cells and that baculovirus have the potential to be used as gene transfer system in cardiovascular diseases such as restenosis.     

Cancer gene therapy by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer

Cancer arises as a direct result of genetic mutations. It therefore stands to reason that cancer should be well suited for the correction through gene therapy. Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cancer and the rapid development of recombinant DNA technology have made cancer gene therapy feasible in the clinical setting. The current efforts for cancer gene therapy mainly focus on immunogene therapy, chemogene therapy, restoration of tumor suppressor gene function, and oncolytic virus therapy. Central to all these therapies is the development of efficient vectors for gene delivery--this remains a work in progress. These vectors can be classified as viral and non-viral vectors. This paper will concentrate on viral vectors because of their practical advantages over non-viral vectors. Of the viral vectors, by far the most important are the human adenoviruses as is reflected by the enormous data and literature accumulated by studies relating to animal tumor models and clinical trials. In this review, we examine the recent progress in adenovirus-mediated cancer gene therapy with regard to cytokine gene, tumor suppressor gene, chemogene, and oncolytic adenovirus. We also discuss the current limitations of the adenoviral vector system and how they may be circumvented in future developments relating to targeted gene delivery.     

Improvements in Gene Therapy

Gene therapy is an interesting approach for the correction of defective genes, the treatment of cancer and the introduction of immunomodulatory genes. Various techniques for gene transfer into cells or tissues have been developed within the last decade; these can be divided generally into viral and nonviral gene transfer systems. Nonviral techniques include the liposome- or gene gun-mediated introduction of therapeutic genes; however, the efficiency of gene transfer by these applications is still very low. In contrast, viruses have optimised their strategies for efficient infection of virtually any cell type in a mammalian organism. The genetic modification of genomes from different virus families (Adenoviridae, Retroviridae, Herpesviridae) led to the development of gene therapy vectors with a similar capacity to infect cells or tissues as that of wild type viruses. In contrast to wild type viruses, gene therapy vectors are engineered to transfer therapeutic genes into the target cells or tissues. In addition, they have lost their capacity for replication in target cells, because of the removal of essential genes, which allows replication only in specialised packaging cell lines engineered for the production of recombinant viruses. Despite considerable progress over the past decade in the generation of gene transfer systems with reduced immunogenic properties, the remaining immunogenicity of many gene therapy vectors is still the major hurdle, preventing their frequent application in clinical trials. Recombinant adenoviruses have been shown to be promising vectors for gene therapy, since they are able to transduce both quiescent and proliferating cells very efficiently. However, a major disadvantage of adenoviral vectors lies in the activation of both the innate and adaptive parts of the recipient's immune system when applied in vivo. The inflammatory responses induced by adenovirus particles can be very strong and can be fatal in patients treated with these adenoviral constructs. Therefore, many experiments have been performed in the effort to prevent these inflammatory responses mediated by adenoviral particles. The depletion of cell populations responsible for these inflammatory responses as well as the application of immunosuppressive drugs have been investigated. Moreover, the generation of less immunogenic adenoviral vectors by further genetic modification within the adenoviral genome has led to vectors with reduced immunogenic properties. Both strategies to reduce inflammatory responses against adenoviral particles are discussed in this review.     

Viral based gene therapy for prostate cancer

In the last few years, significant advances in gene therapy have been made as a result of advances in many areas of molecular and cell biology, including the improvement of both viral and nonviral gene delivery systems, discovery of new therapeutic genes, better understanding of mechanism of disease progression, exploration of tissue specific promoter, receptor- and antibody-mediated targeting delivery, and development of better prodrug enzyme/prodrug systems. In this article, viral based gene therapy for prostate cancer will be reviewed and discussed. The areas of emphasis in this review are: choice of viral vectors, comparison of delivery routes, development of prostate-targeted viruses, choice of therapeutic genes and strategies including corrective gene therapy (tumor suppressor gene and anti-oncogene gene approaches), suicide gene therapy, programmed cell death therapy, immunomodulation therapy, and conditional oncolytic virus approach. Among them, several examples will be discussed in detail for the scientific basis and therapeutic applications. In addition, prostate cancer gene therapy clinical trials, unresolved problems and future directions in this field will also be described.     

Gene delivery into primary T cells

Technologies for transfer of exogenous genes into primary T cells have been limited until recently. The introduction of new approaches for gene transfer viadifferent viral vectors has expan ded the options for genetic manipulation of primary T cells and has provided powerful tools for studies of T cell activation and differentiation. We provide a brief overview of the systems currently available and contranst the advantages and disadvantages of each. We also describe a new transgenic model that enables highly efficient gene delivery into primary T cells by nonreplic ating adenoviral vectors.     

Distribution of adenoviral vector in brain after intravenous administration

The delivery of transgenes to the central nervous system (CNS) can be a valuable tool to treat CNS diseases. Various systems for the delivery to the CNS have been developed; vascular delivery of viral vectors being most recent. Here, we investigated gene transfer to the CNS by intravenous injection of recombinant adenoviral vectors, containing green fluorescence protein (GFP) as a reporter gene. Expression of GFP was first observed 6 days after the gene transfer, peaked at 14 days, and almost diminished after 28 days. The observed expression of GFP in the CNS was highly localized to hippocampal CA regions of cerebral neocortex, inferior colliculus of midbrain, and granular cell and Purkinje cell layers of cerebellum. It is concluded that intravenous delivery of adenoviral vectors can be used for gene delivery to the CNS, and hence the technique could be beneficial to gene therapy.     

Biosafety of adenoviral vectors

Adenoviral vectors can efficiently transduce a broad variety of different cell types and have been used extensively in preclinical and clinical studies. However, early generation of adenoviral vectors retained residual adenoviral genes that contribute to inflammatory immune responses and toxicity. In addition, these vectors often result in transient expression of the potentially therapeutic transgene. Some clinical trials based on early generation adenoviral vectors have been discontinued because of acute inflammatory responses and toxicity and even one patient has died as a direct consequence of adenoviral toxicity. The latest generation of high-capacity adenoviral vectors is devoid of viral genes, and is having a significantly improved safety profile and yielding more prolonged transgene expression compared to early generation vectors. Nevertheless, transgene expression gradually declines even when high-capacity adenoviral vectors are used, possibly due to the gradual loss of vector genomes. Despite their improved safety, high-capacity adenoviral vectors can still trigger transient toxic effects in animals and patients. Restricting the tropism of adenoviral vectors by immunologic or genetic re-targeting may further improve their therapeutic window. The safety of adenoviral vectors has been improved further through the development of safer packaging systems that eliminate the homologous overlap between vector and helper sequences and therefore prevent formation of replication-competent adenoviruses (RCA). RCA could exacerbate inflammatory responses and act as a helper to rescue adenoviral vectors, potentially increasing the effective vector dose. Conditionally replicating adenoviruses (CRAds) have been developed for cancer gene therapy, which replicate selectively in some cancer cells. The use of CRAds in combination with chemotherapy yielded therapeutic effects in patients suffering from cancer but dose-limiting toxicity was apparent. Although there appears to be a very low theoretical risk of malignancy that is predominantly associated with the occurrence of E1-positive recombinants, no malignancies have been reported that were associated with adenoviral vectors. Nevertheless, integrating adenoviral vectors carry a greater malignancy risk due to their ability to integrate randomly into the target genomes.     

Advances in helper-dependent adenoviral vector research

The immunogenicity and cytotoxicity associated with early generations of adenoviral vectors provided a strong incentive for the development of helper-dependent adenovirus, a last generation of adenoviral vectors that is devoid of all viral coding sequences. These vectors have shown to mediate longer high-level transgene expression in vivo with reduced toxicity and thus offer enormous potential for human gene therapy. In addition, they possess a considerably larger cloning capacity than conventional adenoviral vectors making the transfer of large cDNAs, multiple transgenes and longer tissue-specific or regulable promoters possible. In this article, we review the progress made with helper-dependent adenoviral vectors. The development and optimization of scalable production processes and strategies for helper removal will be presented. Current chromatography options available for vector purification and the new challenges facing researchers for the separation of empty particles and/or helper viruses will be discussed. Finally, we will describe recent advances made in our understanding of their interaction with the immune system and their potential as gene delivery vehicles in vivo for the treatment of diseases affecting liver, skeletal muscle and brain.     

Approaches to utilize mesenchymal progenitor cells as cellular vehicles

Mammalian cells represent a novel vector approach for gene delivery that overcomes major drawbacks of viral and nonviral vectors and couples cell therapy with gene delivery. A variety of cell types have been tested in this regard, confirming that the ideal cellular vector system for ex vivo gene therapy has to comply with stringent criteria and is yet to be found. Several properties of mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs), such as easy access and simple isolation and propagation procedures, make these cells attractive candidates as cellular vehicles. In the current work, we evaluated the potential utility of MPCs as cellular vectors with the intent to use them in the cancer therapy context. When conventional adenoviral (Ad) vectors were used for MPC transduction, the highest transduction efficiency of MPCs was 40%. We demonstrated that Ad primary-binding receptors were poorly expressed on MPCs, while the secondary Ad receptors and integrins presented in sufficient amounts. By employing Ad vectors with incorporated integrin-binding motifs (Ad5lucRGD), MPC transduction was augmented tenfold, achieving efficient genetic loading of MPCs with reporter and anticancer genes. MPCs expressing thymidine kinase were able to exert a bystander killing effect on the cancer cell line SKOV3ip1 in vitro. In addition, we found that MPCs were able to support Ad replication, and thus can be used as cell vectors to deliver oncolytic viruses. Our results show that MPCs can foster expression of suicide genes or support replication of adenoviruses as potential anticancer therapeutic payloads. These findings are consistent with the concept that MPCs possess key properties that ensure their employment as cellular vehicles and can be used to deliver either therapeutic genes or viruses to tumor sites.