Present status of ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation in Japan

ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been performed in Japan to overcome the organ shortage. Reported herein are the results of this approach through March 2006 in the National Registry of the Japan Study Group for ABO-incompatible transplantation. The questionnaires consisted of patient characteristics, operative data, and strategies for preventing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Data of 291 patients (follow-up period, 8 months-15 years; mean, 35 months) from 28 institutions were collected. Age was younger than 1 year in 68 patients, 1 to 7 years in 60 patients, 8 to15 years in 27 patients, and 16 years or older in 136 patients. The strategy for the blood-type barrier was heterogeneous in terms of recipient age, transplant center, and era. Local infusion and rituximab prophylaxis were applied in 2000 and 2003, respectively. The 5-year patient survival rate was 85% in infants and 52% in adults. The major causes of death were infection and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Multivariate analysis showed that age group, preoperative condition, antibody titer, and infection significantly affected survival. Age group, antibody titer, and local infusion treatment significantly affected the incidence of AMR. Patient survival rates were significantly higher and the incidence of AMR was significantly lower in adult patients after 2000 (3 year-survival rate, 29%, 56%, and 61%; incidence of AMR, 47%, 27%, and 16%, through May 2000, from June 2000 through October 2003, and from November 2003, respectively). CONCLUSION: ABO-incompatible LDLT is a standard practice in children, and local infusion and rituximab prophylaxis are promising in adults.     

Successful Long-term Outcome of ABO-incompatible Liver Transplantation Using Antigen-specific Immunoadsorption Columns

ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) liver transplantation has been performed essentially in patients with acute liver failure awaiting an urgent liver transplantation. Early results with ABO-I liver transplantation were disappointing with a very low graft survival rate (20–50%). The main risk is the occurrence of severe humoral and cellular rejection, vascular thrombosis, and biliary complications. In order to avoid humoral rejection and improve graft survival, total plasma exchange in combination with an intense immunosuppressive regimen has been proposed to decrease hemagglutinin titers in ABO-I liver grafts. In some centers, this regimen was associated with splenectomy, phototherapy, and portal or arterial intrahepatic infusion therapy; however, as these patients are at high risk of sepsis, a selective approach using antigen-specific immunoadsorption with immunoadsorbent columns has been successfully proposed for ABO-I living donor kidney transplantation. Few cases have been reported following liver transplantation. We report our recent experience with three adult patients (two patients with acute liver failure, and one with severe cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy) transplanted in an emergency situation with an ABO-I liver graft and managed with the use of GlycoSorb ABO immunoadsorbent columns and a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen with preservation of the spleen. Eight sessions were performed in the three patients. Antigen-specific immunoadsorption greatly lowered the anti-A hemagglutinin titers. None of the three patients developed acute humoral or cellular rejection. Two patients are alive at 1.5 and 3 years follow-up with a normally functioning graft. The third patient died with a functioning graft, one month after the transplantation, from septic complications.     

Challenge to ABO blood type barrier in living donor liver transplantation

ABO incompatible living donor liver transplantation has the potential to expand the donor pool for patients with end stage liver diseases on the expense of challenges to overcome immunological barriers across blood type. There is a profound impact of age on incidence and severity of antibody mediated rejection (AMR). Even children older than 1 year have chances of AMR; children aged 8 years or older have risks of hepatic necrosis similar to adult liver recipients. The mechanism of AMR is based on circulatory disturbances secondary to inflammation and injury of the vascular endothelium caused by an antibody-antigen-complement reaction. The strategy to overcome ABO blood type barrier is based on both pre-transplant desensitization and adequate treatment of this phenomenon. Nowadays, rituximab is the standard means of desensitization but unfortunately an insufficient aid to treat AMR. Because of low incidence (less than 5% in the rituximab era), in practice of AMR only some case reports about the treatment of clinical AMR are available in the literature. Initial experiences revealed that the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib might be a promising treatment based on its capacity to deplete plasma cell agents. Although ABO blood type barrier has been counteracted in 95% of patients by applying “rituximab-desensitization”, many issues, such as prediction of high-risk patients of infection and AMR and secure treatment strategies for evoked AMR, remain to be resolved.     

Outcomes after liver transplantation in accordance with ABO compatibility: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM To evaluate the differences in outcomes between ABOincompatible(ABO-I) liver transplantation(LT) and ABO-compatible(ABO-C) LT.METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching eligible articles published before November 28, 2016 on MEDLINE(Pub Med), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints were graft survival, patient survival, and ABO-I-related complications. RESULTS Twenty-one retrospective observational studies with a total of 8247 patients were included in this metaanalysis. Pooled results of patient survival for ABO-I LT were comparable to those for ABO-C LT. However, ABO-I LT showed a poorer graft survival than ABO-C LT(1-year: OR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.57-0.76, P 0.001; 3-year: OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.85, P 0.001; 5-yearr: OR =0.75, 95%CI: 0.66-0.86, P 0.001). Furthermore, ABO-I LT was associated with more incidences of antibody-mediated rejection(OR = 74.21, 95%CI: 16.32-337.45, P 0.001), chronic rejection(OR =2.28, 95%CI: 1.00-5.22, P = 0.05), cytomegalovirus infection(OR = 2.64, 95%CI: 1.63-4.29, P 0.001), overall biliary complication(OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.01-2.28, P = 0.04), and hepatic artery complication(OR = 4.17, 95%CI: 2.26-7.67, P 0.001) than ABO-C LT. In subgroup analyses, ABO-I LT and ABO-C LT showed a comparable graft survival in pediatric patients and those using rituximab, and ABO-I LT showed an increased acute cellular rejection in cases involving deceased donor grafts.CONCLUSION Although patient survival in ABO-I LT was comparable to that in ABO-C LT, ABO-I LT was inferior to ABO-C LT in graft survival and several complications. Graft survival of ABO-I LT could be comparable to that of ABO-C LT in pediatric patients and those using rituximab.     

The use of ABO-incompatible grafts in living donor liver transplantation—First report from India

ABO incompatibility is the commonest reason for rejection of donors in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The donor pool could be expanded by 25 % to 35 % if the ABO barrier is overcome. In the absence of pre-conditioning, transplantation across the blood groups is fraught with the almost universal risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) that rapidly leads to graft loss. However, AMR can be prevented by removal of preformed antibodies and reducing their production by B cells. We describe our initial experience of three cases of ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) LDLT: a 42-year-old male, an 8-month-old male and a 28-month-old female, all of blood group O+ who received blood group B + right lobe, B + left lateral segment, and A + left lateral segment liver grafts, respectively. Pre-LDLT conditioning included administration of anti-CD20 antibody (Rituximab^®) to the adult 4 weeks prior, and four to seven sessions of double-filtration plasmapheresis to all, to remove preformed antibodies and achieve anti-donor blood group antibody (ADA) titers of ≤1:16 IgG and ≤1:8 IgM, respectively. In addition, cases 1 and 3 received mycophenolate mofetil for 7 days prior to LDLT. After LDLT, all three patients achieved normal graft function over 8–17 days with no evidence of AMR and without the need for further plasmapheresis. Postoperative complications included portal vein thrombosis (one successfully re-explored), CMV (one), Pseudomonas and Klebsiella sepsis (one each), and abdominal collection (one treated with percutaneous drainage). All are currently well with normal graft function and low ADA titers at 8, 16, and 19 months after ABO-i LDLT.     

Small-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: Definition,pathophysiology and management

BackgroundSince the first success in an adult patient, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become an universally used procedure. Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-known complication after partial LT, especially in cases of adult-to-adult LDLT. The definition of SFSS slightly varies among transplant physicians. The use of a partial liver graft has risks of SFSS development. Persistent portal vein (PV) hypertension and PV hyper-perfusion after LT were identified as the main factors. Hence, various approaches were explored to modulate PV flow and decrease PV pressure in order to alleviate this syndrome. Herein, the definition, clinical symptoms, pathophysiology, basic research, as well as preventive and treatment strategies for SFSS are reviewed based on an extensive review of the literature and on our own experiences.Data sourcesThe articles were collected through PubMed using search terms “liver transplantation”, “living donor liver transplantation”, “living liver donation”, “partial graft”, “small-for-size graft”, “small-for-size syndrome”, “graft volume”, “remnant liver”, “standard liver volume”, “graft to recipient body weight ratio”, “sarcopenia”, “porcine”, “swine”, and “rat”. English publications published before March 31, 2020 were included in this review.ResultsMany transplant surgeons performed PV flow modulation, including portocaval shunt, splenic artery ligation and splenectomy. With these techniques, patient outcome has been improved even when using a "small" graft. Other factors, such as preoperative recipients’ nutritional and skeletal muscle status, graft congestion, and donor factors, were also identified as risk factors which all have been addressed using various strategies.ConclusionsThe surgical approach controlling PV flow and pressure could help to prevent SFSS especially in severely ill recipients. In the absence of efficacious medications to resolve SFSS, conservative treatments, including aggressive fluid balance correction for massive ascites, anti-microbiological therapy to prevent or control sepsis and intensive nutritional therapy, are all required if SFSS could not be prevented.     

Therapeutic apheresis in ABO‐incompatible kidney and liver transplantation: A single‐center experience of 50 patients

ABO antigens play an important role in solid organ transplantation. Desensitization for ABO incompatibility offers patients awaiting transplant a larger donor pool. The aim of this study was to assess outcome of desensitization using the institutional preconditioning protocol in ABO‐incompatible solid organ transplants. A retrospective analysis of ABO‐incompatible solid organ transplants between October 2015 and June 2018, at a tertiary healthcare center was performed. The preconditioning regimen consisted of immunosuppression and therapeutic apheresis (TA). Pre‐ and post‐TA titers were performed, until a target titer of 8 or below was achieved, at which transplant was performed. Follow‐up data till 1 year was analyzed. A total of 50 ABO‐incompatible solid organ transplantations, including 14 liver transplants and 36 renal transplants were analyzed. The median baseline anti‐A and anti‐B titers were 192 and 256, respectively. A total of 150 therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) procedures were performed for renal transplant recipients; 19 TPE and eight immunoadsorption procedures (five preoperative and three intraoperative) were performed for liver transplant recipients. Five (10%) patients experienced minor adverse events. Biopsy revealed antibody‐mediated rejection was observed in three cases in the immediate posttransplant phase and in three (6.67%) cases over 1 year. There was one death due to transplant‐associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Graft survival for renal transplant was 100% and death‐censored graft survival for liver transplant was 100%. Despite difficulties, ABO‐incompatible transplants can be performed without antibody‐mediated rejection with the use of an appropriate protocol.     

Perioperative blood usage and therapeutic plasma exchange in kidney transplantation during a 16-year period in South Korea

BackgroundThe frequency of kidney transplantation (KT) is increasing. Blood transfusion plays an important role in the success of KT. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is also used for desensitisation in ABO-incompatible KT and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection.Materials and methodsWe analysed red blood cell (RBC), platelet, and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) usage and the number of TPE procedures performed during the hospitalisation of KT patients from 2002 to 2017 using the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Health Information Database.ResultsA total of 18,331 KT patients were included in this study. The number of transfused RBCs continued to increase from 4,806 units in 2002–2005 to 12,390 units in 2014–2017. However, the average number of RBCs transfused per patient decreased from 2.17 to 1.79 units. Estimated platelet usage increased from 4,259 units in 2002–2005 to 11,519 units in 2014–2017, and the proportion of filtered platelets increased from 72.6% to 83.4% during the same period. There was a huge increase in the total number of FFP units used, from 2,255 units in 2002–2005 to 51,531 units in 2014–2017. The number of TPE procedures performed also increased from 296 to 6,479 during the same period. Patients with acute rejection accounted for 8.8% of all KT patients, and more RBC and FFP were used for these patients and a greater number of TPE procedures were performed compared to those who did not experience rejection.DiscussionBlood usage and TPE have increased steadily with the increasing numbers of KTs. Therefore, continuous efforts are needed to ensure appropriate perioperative blood preparation and usage for KT patients.     

Risk factor for ischemic-type biliary lesion after ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

AIM: To evaluate the risk factors for ischemic-type biliary lesion(ITBL) after ABO-incompatible(ABO-I) adult living donor liver transplantation(ALDLT).METHODS: Among 141 ALDLTs performed in our hospital between 2008 and 2014, 27(19%) were ABO-I ALDLT and 114 were ABO-identical/compatible ALDLT. In this study, we extensively analyzed the clinico-pathological data of the 27 ABO-I recipients to determine the risk factors for ITBL after ABO-I ALDLT. All ABO-I ALDLT recipients underwent an identical B-cell depletion protocol with preoperative rituximab, plasma exchange(PE), and operative splenectomy. The median follow-up period after transplantation was 26 mo. The clinical outcomes of the 27 ABO-I ALDLT recipients were compared with those of 114 ABO-identical/compatible ALDLT recipients.RESULTS: ITBL occurred in four recipients(14.8%) between 45 and 112 d after ABO-I ALDLT. The overall survival rates were not different between ABO-I ALDLT and ABO-identical/compatible ALDLT(P = 0.303). Among the ABO-I ALDLT recipients, there was no difference between patients with ITBL and those without ITBL in terms of B-cell and T-cell count, serum isoagglutinin titers, number of PEs, operative time and transfusion, use of graft infusion therapy, or number of remnant B-cell follicles and plasma cells in the spleen. However, the perioperative NK cell counts in the blood of patients with ITBL were significantly higher than those in the patients without ITBL(P 0.05). Preoperative NK cell count 150/μL and postoperative NK cell count 120/μL were associated with greater relative risks(RR) for development of ITBL(RR = 20 and 14.3, respectively, P 0.05). CONCLUSION: High NK cell counts in a transplant recipient's blood are associated with ITBL after ABO-I ALDLT. Further research is needed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of NK cell involvement in the development of ITBL.     

Conversion therapy in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: What's new in the era of molecular and immune therapy?

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer globally, with limited therapies and unsatisfactory prognosis once in the advanced stages. With promising advances in locoregional and systematic treatments, fast development of targeted drugs, the success of immunotherapy, as well as the emergence of the therapeutic alliance, conversion therapy has recently become more well developed and an effective therapeutic strategy. This article aimed to review recent developments in conversion therapy in liver transplantation (LT) for HCC.Data sourcesWe searched for relevant publications on PubMed before September 2022, using the terms “HCC”, “liver transplantation”, “downstaging”, “bridging treatment” and “conversion therapy.”ResultsConversion therapy was frequently represented as a combination of multiple treatment modalities to downstage HCC and make patients eligible for LT. Although combining various local and systematic treatments in conversion therapy is still controversial, growing evidence has suggested that multimodal combined treatment strategies downstage HCC in a shorter time, which ultimately increases the opportunities for LT. Moreover, the recent breakthrough of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for HCC also benefit patients with advanced-stage tumors.ConclusionsIn the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, applying the thinking of transplant oncology to benefit HCC patients receiving LT is a new topic that has shed light on advanced-stage patients. With the expansion of conversion therapy concepts, further investigation and research is required to realize the full potential of conversion treatment strategies, including accurately selecting candidates, determining the timing of surgery, improving the conversion rate, and guaranteeing the safety and long-term efficacy of treatment.     

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation without graft local infusion and splenectomy

Background

Graft local infusion and splenectomy in ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are associated with high rates of operative complications.

Methods

Consecutive ABO-I LDLT patients treated at the National Cancer Centre between January 2012 and February 2013 were identified. The protocol for ABO-I LDLT at the study centre included the administration of rituximab (300 mg/m²) at 2 weeks preoperatively, followed by plasma exchanges (target isoagglutinin titre: ≤1 : 8), basiliximab (20 mg on the day of surgery and on postoperative day 4), and i.v. immunoglobulin (0.8 g/kg on postoperative days 1 and 4) without graft local infusion or splenectomy.

Results

Fifteen patients (11 men and four women) who underwent transplantation for liver cirrhosis (n = 3) or hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 12) were identified. These included 13 patients with hepatitis B virus infection, one with hepatitis C virus infection and one with alcoholic cirrhosis. The mean age, mean Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and mean graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of these patients was 51.8 years, 11.5 and 0.84, respectively. The median isoagglutinin titre before plasma exchange was 1 : 32 (range: 1 : 4 to 1 : 256). There were no hyperacute or antibody-mediated rejections. No bacterial or fungal infections were observed. Complications included herpes zoster viral infection in one patient, postoperative bleeding in one patient and extrahepatic biliary stricture in three patients.

Conclusions

This simplified ABO-I LDLT protocol showed good graft outcomes without immunologic failure or serious infections.     

Severe hepatic necrosis of unknown causes following ABO-incompatible liver transplantation

Emergency ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) liver transplantations (LTx) have been performed increasingly to treat severe liver failure.Herein,we report a case of severe hepatic necrosis after ABO-I LTx.A 53-year-old man with blood group O was diagnosed as having severe hepatitis B and acute-on-chronic liver failure,and underwent an emergency liver transplantation implanting a blood-group-B liver from a cardiac-death donor.A routine anti-rejection,anti-infection and anti-virus therapy was given after operation.On post-operative day (POD) 16,the recipient had fever and erythra.Laboratory and radiographic examinations suggested a severe hepatic necrosis of unknown causes.The patient was managed with a 10-d methylprednisolone pulse therapy.He was discharged on POD 35 with stable condition,and no recurrent disease was found during the follow-up.     

A comparison of desensitization methods: Rituximab with/without plasmapheresis in ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

Background: Plasmapheresis is a desensitization method used prior to ABO-incompatible(ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation. However, studies on its usefulness in the rituximab era are lacking.Methods: Fifty-six adult patients underwent ABO-I living donor liver transplantation between January2012 and October 2015. A single dose of rituximab(300 mg/m~2) was administered 2 weeks before surgery with plasmapheresis in all patients until February 2014(RP group, n = 26). Patients were administered rituximab only, without plasmapheresis between March 2014 and October 2015(RO group, n = 30).Results: The 6-, 12-and 18-month overall survival rates were 92.3%, 80.8% and 76.9% in the RP group and 96.6%, 85.4% and 85.4% in the RO group, respectively(P = 0.574). When the initial isoagglutinin titers 16, neither group showed a rebound rise of isoagglutinin titers. For patients with initial isoagglutinin titers ≥ 16, the rebound rise of isoagglutinin titers was more prominent in the RP group. There was no difference in time-dependent changes in B cell subpopulations and ABO-I-related complications.Conclusions: Sufficient desensitization for ABO-I living donor liver transplantation can be achieved using rituximab alone. This desensitization strategy does not affect the isoagglutinin titers, ABO-I-related complications and patient survival.     

Impact of cytomegalovirus reactivation just before liver transplantation: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUNDCytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral pathogen after liver transplantation (LT). Although reactivation of CMV infection is generally described in the context of immunosuppression, it has also been described in critically ill immunocompetent patients including cirrhotic patients.AIMTo determine the incidence of reactivated CMV prior to LT.METHODSThis was a prospective cohort study evaluating adult patients who underwent LT between 2014 and 2016. A plasma sample was obtained from all patients for CMV quantitative real-time PCR testing right before transplantation. Patients were followed for at least 1 year to assess the following outcomes: Incidence of CMV infection, organ rejection and overall mortality. RESULTSA total of 72 patients were enrolled. Four patients died before transplantation, thus 68 patients were followed up for a median of 44 mo (20-50 mo). In 23/72 patients (31.9%) CMV was reactivated before transplantation. Post-transplantation, 16/68 (23.5%) patients had CMV infection and that was significantly associated with the recipient being CMV negative and a CMV-positive donor. Pre-transplant CMV reactivation was not associated with overall mortality (log rank: 0.9).CONCLUSIONThis study shows that CMV infection is common in patients with chronic liver disease just before LT, but the clinical impact of this infection seems to be negligible.     

Therapeutic apheresis in transplantation medicine,experience with cardiac and lung transplantation in Jena

Immunological problems like preformed donor specific antibodies (DSA) or high degree of immunization complicate the transplantation (TX) and can limit the therapeutic success.Essential pillars of antihumoral therapy are the extracorporeal procedures like therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and high plasma volume immunoadsorption (IA). Both extracorporeal treatments have the ability to remove pre-existing or newly formed antibodies quickly and effectively.In the last 5 years a total of 27 patients, 12 heart transplant (HTX) patients, 3 patients after combined lung and heart transplantation (Lu/HTX) and 12 lung transplant (LuTX) patients were treated for prevention (6 patients) or in case of rejection (20 patients) with TPE, cascade filtration (CF) or IA. 6 HTX recipients and 5 LuTX recipients were tested positive for HLA-ab either donor specific or de novo HLA-ab. Altogether 7 patients were tested positive for non-HLA-ab. 6 patients were treated prior to TX with 1-3 TPEs. After TX we treated 24 patients initially with TPE and performed on average 4 TPEs (1–11) for antibody elimination.22 of 27 treated patients survived with stable graft function.The extracorporeal procedures we performed are qualified for rescue therapy of antibody mediated rejection (AMR).     

A systematic review of small for size syndrome after major hepatectomy and liver transplantation

BackgroundMajor hepatectomy (MH) and particular types of liver transplantation (LT) (reduced size graft, living-donor and split-liver transplantation) lead to a reduction in liver mass. As the portal venous return remains the same it results in a reciprocal and proportionate rise in portal venous pressure potentially resulting in small for size syndrome (SFSS). The aim of this study was to review the incidence, diagnosis and management of SFSS amongst recipients of LT and MH.MethodsA systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2010 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The following terms were used to search PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library in July 2019: (“major hepatectomy” or “liver resection” or “liver transplantation”) AND (“small for size syndrome” or “post hepatectomy liver failure”). The primary outcome was a diagnosis of SFSS.ResultsTwenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria and could be included in this review. In total 2728 patients were included of whom 316 (12%) patients met criteria for SFSS or post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Of these, 31 (10%) fulfilled criteria for PHLF following MH. 8 of these patients developed intractable ascites alongside elevated portal venous pressure following MH indicative of SFSS.ConclusionSFSS is under-recognised following major hepatectomy and should be considered as an underlying cause of PHLF. Surgical and pharmacological therapies are available to reduce portal congestion and reverse SFSS.     

The role of apheresis therapy for ABO incompatible living donor liver transplantation: the Kyoto University experience

Liver transplantation is a radical surgical therapy for end-stage liver disease. Although in Japan organ transplantation from brain-dead donors (BDD) has been allowed since October 1997, to date, only 29 liver grafts from BDD have been obtained. Thus, most of the liver transplantations carried out use living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and BDD liver transplantation is only used in rare cases. In order to carry out LDLT more safely, apheresis (plasmapheresis: PE) plays a major role in our country because of the prevalence of LDLT wherein later re-transplantation is difficult. Thus, because of a limited donor supply and because the needs of patients with end-stage liver disease is critical, use of grafts from ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) donors might be the only available option. From June 1990 to November 2005, 1100 patients underwent 1151 LDLT cases at Kyoto University Hospital. Additionally, 159 LDLT cases (13.8%) received ABO-I living-donor liver grafts. The role of apheresis in ABO-I LDLT is the reduction of antibody titers such as anti-A or anti-B antibody. We carry out preoperative PE as a general rule for ABO-I cases, and the recipient's antibody level against the donor's blood type is decreased to one eighth of the baseline value before LDLT. Until now, baseline immunosuppressive agents included steroids, tacrolimus and cyclophosphamide. At first, splenectomy was carried out during surgery to suppress antibody production, and intraportal (PV) infusion therapy was carried out to control local disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) occurring in ABO-I grafts. At that time, three drugs-methylprednisolone, prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), and gabexate mesylate (FOY) were infused continuously for 3 weeks after LDLT. At present, instead of PV infusion therapy, hepatic artery infusion therapy without splenectomy is adopted because of portal thrombosis, and two drugs- methylprednisolone and PGE1- are infused continuously for 3 weeks following LDLT. Recently, we introduced anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (Rituximab) instead of splenectomy for B cell deletion before ABO-I LDLT. In the present article, we describe the role of apheresis around ABO-I LDLT based on our recent experiences.     

ABO-blood type incompatible living donor liver transplantation in a patient with Budd-Chiari Syndrome secondary to essential thrombocythemia

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) results from diverse causative factors. Myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) including essential thrombocythemia (ET) account for a minority of BCS cases in Japan. ABO-blood-type incompatible living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in adults has become an acceptable procedure owing to the development of new strategies for preventing antibody-mediated rejection. This report presents a rare case of BCS secondary to ET, which was cured by an ABO-incompatible (AB to A) LDLT. In this case, prostaglandin E₁ and gabexate mesilate were administered into portal vein and rituximab prophylaxis was applied. No splenectomy was performed as it is in most ABO-incompatible cases, since a flow cytometry showed no anti-B antibodies in the splenocytes collected by a wedge biopsy during the LDLT. The postoperative course was uneventful. Anti-coagulation therapy was initiated with aspirin and warfarin instead of hydroxyurea. This report describes an ABO-incompatible LDLT without a splenectomy for BCS secondary to ET.     

ABO blood group system and bone marrow transplantation.

The role of the ABO blood group system in determining the outcome of bone marrow transplantation was investigated in 53 patients with aplastic anemia and acute leukemia grafted from HLA-identical siblings. There was no correlation between ABO compatibility and marrow engraftment, graft rejection, or graft-versus-host disease. In 5 recipients with antibodies prior to transplantation to antigens of the ABH system present on the cells of their donors, plasma exchange and antibody absorption in vivo were effective in permitting engraftment of ABO-incompatible bone marrow. These findings indicate that the ABO system is not a clinically significant barrier to successful bone marrow transplantation in otherwise histocompatible individuals.     

Herpes simplex virus hepatitis after pediatric liver transplantation

T. Hori, Y. Ogura, S. Okamoto, A. Nakajima, K. Kami, J. Iwasaki, Y. Yonekawa, K. Ogawa, F. Oike, Y. Takada, H. Egawa, J.H. Nguyen, S. Uemoto. Herpes simplex virus hepatitis after pediatric liver transplantation
Transpl Infect Dis 2010: 12: 353–357. All rights reserved Abstract: Herpes simplex virus (HSV) hepatitis has a fatal impact on the outcome of organ transplanted recipients. Here, we present a thought‐provoking case of HSV hepatitis in a high‐risk recipient after living‐related liver transplantation (LRLT). A 1‐month‐old female newborn infant was affected by HSV encephalitis. Fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) of unknown etiology occurred suddenly at 4.4 years of age. Viral infections were ruled out as the cause of FHF. Intensive care including plasma exchange (PE) was started, and the preoperative treatments for ABO incompatibility were performed. Thereafter, LRLT was performed emergently. Although strong immunosuppression for ABO incompatibility was continued after LRLT, antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) occurred on postoperative day (POD) 4. PE was repeated and improvements were obtained. However, liver dysfunction appeared on POD 8. Histopathological findings of liver needle biopsy clearly revealed HSV hepatitis, although the results of HSV DNA and antibody titer in blood sample did not clearly indicate HSV infection. On POD 21, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) occurred and the plasma and immunoglobulin were replenished. Our pediatric recipient recovered successfully from AMR, HSV hepatitis, TMA, and repeated sepsis. We conclude that well considered therapy based on the real‐time detection of HSV hepatitis is indispensable for the further improvements of outcome in HSV hepatitis after LRLT.