A New Care Model Reduces Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Long-Term Care

ObjectivesAssess the impact of a new pharmaceutical care model on (1) polypharmacy and (2) potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in long-term care facilities (LTCFs).DesignPragmatic quasi-experimental study with a control group. This multifaceted model enables pharmacists and nurses to increase their professional autonomy by enforcing laws designed to expand their scope of practice. It also involves a strategic reorganization of care, interdisciplinary training, and systematic medication reviews.Setting and ParticipantsTwo LTCFs exposed to the model (409 residents) were compared to 2 control LTCFs (282 residents) in Quebec, Canada. All individuals were aged 65 years or older and residing in included LTCFs.MeasuresPolypharmacy (≥10 medications) and PIM (2015 Beers criteria) were analyzed throughout 12 months between March 2017 and June 2018. Groups were compared before and after implementation using repeated measures mixed Poisson or logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounding variables.ResultsOver 12 months, for regular medications, polypharmacy decreased from 42% to 20% (exposed group) and from 50% to 41% (control group) [difference in differences (DID): 13%, P < .001]. Mean number of PIMs also decreased from 0.79 to 0.56 (exposed group) and from 1.08 to 0.90 (control group) (DID: 0.05, P = .002).Conclusions and ImplicationsCompared with usual care, this multifaceted model reduced the probability of receiving ≥10 medications and the mean number of PIMs. Greater professional autonomy, reorganization of care, training, and medication review can optimize pharmaceutical care. As the role of pharmacists is expanding in many countries, this model shows what could be achieved with increased professional autonomy of pharmacists and nurses in LTCFs.     

Residential Respite Care Use Is Associated With Fewer Overall Days in Residential Aged Care

ObjectivesTo examine the use of residential respite care and determine associations between respite care and total days spent in residential care (respite days plus long-term care days).DesignA retrospective cohort study of individuals accessing aged care services in Australia using the National Historical Cohort of the Registry of Senior Australians was conducted.SettingResidential respite care (short stays in residential aged care homes) and long-term residential care accessed in all government-subsidized residential aged care homes in Australia.ParticipantsThis study included people who were approved for government-subsidized residential respite care between January 2005 and June 2012 (n = 480,862) and included a 2-year follow-up period.MethodsPoisson regression models were used to examine associations between use of residential respite care and number of days spent in residential care.ResultsOf people approved for residential respite care, 36.9% used their approval within 12 months (32.0% used respite once and went directly to long-term care without returning home, 40.7% used respite once and did not go directly to long-term care, and 27.3% used respite ≥2 times). Compared with people who did not use respite care, using respite care once and not going directly to long-term care was associated with less total days in residential care [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.69; P < .001] and using respite care ≥2 times was also associated with fewer days (IRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84-0.87, P < .001). Using respite care once and going directly to long-term care was associated with more days in residential care (IRR 1.11, 95% CI 1.10-1.12, P < .001).Conclusions and ImplicationsUsing residential respite care was associated with fewer days spent in residential care when people returned home after using respite. The findings suggest that using residential respite as intended by returning home after use achieves the goal of helping people stay living at home longer.     

Factors Associated with Perception of the Quality of Physicians' End-of-life Communication in Long-Term Care Facilities: PACE Cross-Sectional Study

ObjectiveTo examine factors associated with perceived quality of communication with physicians by relatives of dying residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs).DesignA cross-sectional retrospective study in a representative sample of LTCFs conducted in 2015. In each LTCF, deaths of residents during the 3 months before the researcher's visit were reported. Structured questionnaires were sent to the identified relatives of deceased residents.Settings and participantsA total of 736 relatives of deceased residents in 210 LTCFs (in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, and Poland).MethodsThe Family Perception of Physician-Family Communication scale (FPPFC) was used to assess the quality of end-of-life (EOL) communication with physicians as perceived by relatives. We applied multilevel linear regression models to find factors associated with the FPPFC score.ResultsThe quality of EOL communication with physicians was perceived by relatives as higher when the relative spent more than 14 hours with the resident in the last week of the resident's life (b = 0.205; P = .044), and when the treating physician visited the resident at least 3 times in the last week of the resident's life (b = 0.286; P = .002) or provided the resident with palliative care (b = 0.223; P = .003). Relatives with higher emotional burden perceived the quality of EOL communication with physicians as lower (b = −0.060; P < .001). These results had been adjusted to countries and LTCF types with physicians employed on-site or off-site of the facility.ConclusionThe quality of EOL communication with physicians, as perceived by relatives of dying LTCF residents, is associated with the number of physician visits and amount of time spent by the relative with the resident in the last week of the resident's life, and relatives' emotional burden.ImplicationsLTCF managers should organize care for dying residents in a way that enables frequent interactions between physicians and relatives, and emotional support to relatives to improve their satisfaction with EOL communication.     

Stratification by demographic and clinical data of the antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli from urinary tract infections of the community

AimTo determine the patterns of antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli strains isolated from adult patients with urinary tract infection (UTI), and to stratify the results by age and type of UTI to verify if there are statistically significant differences that can help physicians to prescribe better empirical antibiotherapy.DesignCross-sectional prospective study.LocationCommunity of Getafe (Madrid). Primary care level.Participants100 E. coli strains, randomly chosen, isolated from the urine (10⁴–10⁵ cfu/ml) of different patients from primary care centers in the Getafe area.Main measurementsThe antibiotic susceptibility of the strains was evaluated and the results were stratified by age and type of UTI. The clinical and demographic data of the patients were analyzed, classifying each episode as complicated UTI or uncomplicated UTI.ResultsStrains isolated from patients with uncomplicated UTI showed significantly greater susceptibility than those of complicated UTI to amoxicillin (65.9% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.001), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (95.5% vs. 77.6%, p = 0.013) and ciprofloxacin (81.8% vs. 63.3%, p = 0.047). In complicated UTI, susceptibility to ciprofloxacin was significantly greater in the ≤65 years age group compared to the older age group (78.3% vs. 50%, respectively, p = 0.041). In the rest of antibiotics, no statistically significant differences were obtained when comparing by age (≤65 years versus >65 years), both in uncomplicated and complicated UTI.ConclusionsClinical and demographic data of patients with UTI are of great importance in the results of the antibiotic susceptibility in E. coli. Antibiograms stratified by patient characteristics may better facilitate empirical antibiotic selection for UTI in primary care.     

Epidemiology of Antibiotic Use for Urinary Tract Infection in Nursing Home Residents

ObjectivesDescribe antibiotic use for urinary tract infection (UTI) among a large cohort of US nursing home residents.DesignAnalysis of data from a multistate, 1-day point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use performed between April and October 2017.Setting and participantsResidents of 161 nursing homes in 10 US states of the Emerging Infections Program (EIP).MethodsEIP staff reviewed nursing home medical records to collect data on systemic antimicrobial drugs received by residents, including therapeutic site, rationale for use, and planned duration. For drugs with the therapeutic site documented as urinary tract, pooled mean and nursing home–specific prevalence rates were calculated per 100 nursing home residents, and proportion of drugs by selected characteristics were reported. Data were analyzed in SAS, version 9.4.ResultsAmong 15,276 residents, 407 received 424 antibiotics for UTI. The pooled mean prevalence rate of antibiotic use for UTI was 2.66 per 100 residents; nursing home–specific rates ranged from 0 to 13.6. One-quarter of antibiotics were prescribed for UTI prophylaxis, with a median planned duration of 111 days compared with 7 days when prescribed for UTI treatment (P < .001). Fluoroquinolones were the most common (18%) drug class used.Conclusions and ImplicationsOne in 38 residents was receiving an antibiotic for UTI on a given day, and nursing home–specific prevalence rates varied by more than 10-fold. UTI prophylaxis was common with a long planned duration, despite limited evidence to support this practice among older persons in nursing homes. The planned duration was ≥7 days for half of antibiotics prescribed for treatment of a UTI. Fluoroquinolones were the most commonly used antibiotics, despite their association with significant adverse events, particularly in a frail and older adult population. These findings help to identify priority practices for nursing home antibiotic stewardship.     

Nursing Home Antibiotic Stewardship Policy and Antibiotics Use: 2013–2017

ObjectivesReducing inappropriate nursing home (NH) antibiotic usage by implementing stewardship programs is a national priority. Our aim is to evaluate the influence of antibiotic stewardship programs on antibiotic use rates in NHs over time.DesignRetrospective, repeated cross-sectional analysis.Setting and ParticipantsLong-term residents not receiving hospice care in freestanding NHs that participated in 1 or both surveys in 2013 and 2017.MethodsSurvey data were merged with the Minimum Data Set and the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting data. Our outcome was a binary indicator for antibiotic use. The main predictor was the NH antibiotic stewardship policy intensity. Using multivariate linear regression models adjusting for resident and facility characteristics that differed between the 2 years, we calculated antibiotic use rates in 2013 and 2017 for all residents, those with Alzheimer's disease, and those with any infection including urinary tract infections (UTIs).ResultsOur sample included 317,003 resident assessments from 2013 and 267,537 assessments from 2017, residing in 953 and 872 NHs, respectively. NH antibiotic stewardship policy intensity increased from 2013 to 2017 (P < .01) and among all NH residents, including those with Alzheimer's disease, antibiotic use rate decreased (P < .05), with 45% of the decline attributable to strengthening stewardship programs. For most residents, policy intensity was associated with decreased usage in residents with UTI. However, among Alzheimer's disease residents with a UTI, this association did not persist.Conclusions and ImplicationsAlthough there was a decrease in antibiotic use in 2017, more time is needed to see the full impact of antibiotic stewardship policy into practice. Adjustments to programs that directly address barriers to implementation and appropriate UTI antibiotic use for residents with Alzheimer's disease are necessary to continue strengthening NH antibiotic stewardship and improve care.     

Perception of the Quality of Communication With Physicians Among Relatives of Dying Residents of Long-term Care Facilities in 6 European Countries: PACE Cross-Sectional Study

ObjectiveTo examine how relatives evaluate the quality of communication with the treating physician of a dying resident in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and to assess its differences between countries.DesignA cross-sectional retrospective study in a representative sample of LTCFs conducted in 2015. Relatives of residents who died during the previous 3 months were sent a questionnaire.Settings and participants761 relatives of deceased residents in 241 LTCFs in Belgium, England, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, and Poland.MethodsThe Family Perception of Physician-Family Communication (FPPFC) scale (ratings from 0 to 3, where 3 means the highest quality) was used to retrospectively assess how the quality of end-of-life communication with treating physicians was perceived by relatives. We applied multilevel linear and logistic regression models to assess differences between countries and LTCF types.ResultsThe FPPFC score was the lowest in Finland (1.4 ± 0.8) and the highest in Italy (2.2 ± 0.7). In LTCFs served by general practitioners, the FPPFC score differed between countries, but did not in LTCFs with on-site physicians. Most relatives reported that they were well informed about a resident's general condition (from 50.8% in Finland to 90.6% in Italy) and felt listened to (from 53.1% in Finland to 84.9% in Italy) and understood by the physician (from 56.7% in Finland to 85.8% in Italy). In most countries, relatives assessed the worst communication as being about the resident's wishes for medical treatment at the end of life, with the lowest rate of satisfied relatives in Finland (37.6%).ConclusionThe relatives' perception of the quality of end-of-life communication with physicians differs between countries. However, in all countries, physicians' communication needs to be improved, especially regarding resident's wishes for medical care at the end of life.ImplicationsTraining in end-of-life communication to physicians providing care for LTCF residents is recommended.     

Nurse Decision-making for Suspected Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes: Potential Targets to Reduce Antibiotic Overuse

ObjectivesTo determine what information is most important to registered nurses' (RNs) decisions to call clinicians about suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing home residents.DesignWeb-based discrete choice experiment with 19 clinical scenarios.Setting and ParticipantsOnline survey with a convenience sample of RNs (N = 881) recruited from a health care research panel.MethodsClinical scenarios used information from 10 categories of resident characteristics: UTI risk, resident type, functional status, mental status, lower urinary tract status, body temperature, physical examination, urinalysis, antibiotic request, and goals of care. Participants were randomized into 2 deliberation conditions (self-paced, n = 437 and forced deliberation, n = 444). The degree to which evidence- and non–evidence-based information was important to decision-making was estimated using unconditional multinomial logistic regression.ResultsFor all nurses (22.8%) and the self-paced group (24.1%), lower urinary tract status had the highest importance scores for the decision to call a clinician about a suspected UTI. For the forced-deliberation group, body temperature was most important (23.7%), and lower urinary tract status was less important (21%, P = .001). The information associated with the highest odds of an RN calling about a suspected UTI was painful or difficult urination [odds ratio (OR) 4.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.16–5.65], obvious blood in urine (OR 4.66, 95% CI 3.99–5.44), and temperature at 101.5° (OR 3.80, 95% CI 3.28–4.42). For the self-paced group, painful or difficult urination (OR 5.65, 95% CI 4.53–7.04) had the highest odds, whereas obvious blood in urine (OR 4.39, 95% CI 3.53–5.47) had highest odds for the forced-deliberation group.Conclusions and ImplicationsThis study highlighted the importance of specific resident characteristics in nurse decision-making about suspected UTIs. Future antimicrobial stewardship efforts should aim to not only improve the previously studied overprescribing practices of clinicians, but to improve nurses' assessment of signs and symptoms of potential infections and how they weigh resident information.     

A retrospective nationwide register-based study to evaluate the non-specific effects of first MMR vaccination among children in Finland

BackgroundAccording to earlier studies, live vaccines like measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine could reduce also other infections than only the infections they are targeted against. This non-specific effect has been seen especially in studies in low-income countries and results from high-income countries have not been unambiguous. In 2011 Finland changed the recommended schedule for the first MMR vaccination from 18 months to 12 months of age. This change created a natural experiment for evaluating the potential non-specific effects.MethodsThis is a retrospective nationwide register-based cohort study of Finnish children born between 2008 and 2012. Children were divided into two cohorts by age at MMR vaccination: children administered early MMR vaccination (11 through 12 months of age) and late MMR vaccination (18 through 19 months of age). Morbidity was evaluated during the main follow-up period (from 13 to 17 months of age) and before any MMR vaccination (3 to 10 months) and after all were vaccinated with MMR (20 to 35 months) as control follow-up periods. We analyzed all infections and did additional analyzes for urinary tract infections (UTI) and bronchitis. Injuries were analyzed as a control outcome.ResultsEarly MMR vaccinated children (N = 79 949) had fewer infections compared to late MMR vaccinated (N = 60 965) during the main follow-up period. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.84 (95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 0.81–0.87). However, similar differences were also observed during the control follow-up periods. MMR vaccinated children had less UTI in the main follow-up period (IRR 0.73, 0.60–0.89) but not in the control follow-up periods. When stratified by sex, the difference was observed among girls but not in boys.ConclusionNo clear evidence was found for non-specific effects in infectious diseases morbidity. However, there could be a nonspecific effect on UTI. Confirmation is needed from other studies, especially from high-income countries.     

Molecular Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase–Producing Enterobacterales in Long-Term Care Residents

ObjectivesWe aimed to assess the burden of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales in Swiss long-term care facilities (LTCFs) to describe the molecular epidemiology, describe the intrainstitutional and regional clusters of resistant pathogens, and identify independent institution- and resident-level factors associated with colonization.DesignCross-sectional study.Setting and ParticipantsFrom August to October 2019, we performed a point prevalence study among residents from 16 LTCFs in Western and Eastern Switzerland (8 per region).MethodsResidents underwent screening for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E); whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed. We gathered institution-level (eg, number of beds, staff-resident ratio, alcoholic hand rub consumption) and resident-level [eg, anthropometric data, time in facility, dependency, health care exposure, antibiotic treatment, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use] characteristics. Factors associated with colonization were identified using a generalized linear model.ResultsAmong 1185 eligible residents, 606 (51%) consented to the study. ESBL-E prevalence was 11.6% (70/606), ranging from 1.9% to 33.3% between institutions, with a median of 12.5% in the West and 6.9% in the East (P = .03). Among 59 Escherichia coli (from 58 residents), multilocus sequence type (ST) 131 was most common (n = 43/59, 73%), predominantly its subclone H30R1 (n = 37/43, 86%). WGS data identified multiple intrainstitutional and regional clusters. Independent risk factors for ESBL carriage were previous ESBL colonization [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 23.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.6-83.8, P < .001), male gender (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.6, P = .002), and use of PPIs (aOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-3.8, P = .01).Conclusions and ImplicationsOverall ESBL-E prevalence in Swiss LTCF residents is low. Yet, we identified several clusters of residents with identical pathogens within the same institution. This implies that particularly affected institutions might benefit from targeted infection control interventions. PPI use was the only modifiable factor associated with carriage of ESBL producers. This study adds to the growing list of adverse outcomes associated with PPIs, calling for action to restrict their use in the long-term care setting.     

Assessing Pathogen Transmission Opportunities: Variation in Nursing Home Staff-Resident Interactions

ObjectivesThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for all nursing home (NH) residents known to be colonized with targeted multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), wounds, or medical devices. Differences in health care personnel (HCP) and resident interactions between units may affect risk of acquiring and transmitting MDROs, affecting EBP implementation. We studied HCP-resident interactions across a variety of NHs to characterize MDRO transmission opportunities.Design2 cross-sectional visits.Setting and ParticipantsFour CDC Epicenter sites and CDC Emerging Infection Program sites in 7 states recruited NHs with a mix of unit care types (≥30 beds or ≥2 units). HCP were observed providing resident care.MethodsRoom-based observations and HCP interviews assessed HCP-resident interactions, care type provided, and equipment use. Observations and interviews were conducted for 7-8 hours in 3-6-month intervals per unit. Chart reviews collected deidentified resident demographics and MDRO risk factors (eg, indwelling devices, pressure injuries, and antibiotic use).ResultsWe recruited 25 NHs (49 units) with no loss to follow-up, conducted 2540 room-based observations (total duration: 405 hours), and 924 HCP interviews. HCP averaged 2.5 interactions per resident per hour (long-term care units) to 3.4 per resident per hour (ventilator care units). Nurses provided care to more residents (n = 12) than certified nursing assistants (CNAs) and respiratory therapists (RTs) (CNA: 9.8 and RT: 9) but nurses performed significantly fewer task types per interaction compared to CNAs (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.61, P < .05). Short-stay (IRR: 0.89) and ventilator-capable (IRR: 0.94) units had less varied care compared with long-term care units (P < .05), although HCP visited residents in these units at similar rates.Conclusions and ImplicationsResident-HCP interaction rates are similar across NH unit types, differing primarily in types of care provided. Current and future interventions such as EBP, care bundling, or targeted infection prevention education should consider unit-specific HCP-resident interaction patterns.