Relationship between pre-TIPS liver perfusion by the portal vein and the incidence of post-TIPS chronic hepatic encephalopathy

OBJECTIVE: In the present study we evaluated the predictive value of pretransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) portal perfusion as assessed by Doppler ultrasonography for the onset of chronic encephalopathy after TIPS. METHODS: A total of 231 cirrhotic patients were followed-up prospectively after TIPS placement. The pattern of intrahepatic portal flow was assessed before TIPS. Patients were divided into two groups according to Doppler findings. Group 1 comprised patients with prograde portal flow (n = 200), whereas group 2 comprised those with loss of portal perfusion (hepatofugal or back-and-forth flow or portal vein thrombosis; n = 31). The presence of chronic encephalopathy during a median follow-up of 32 months was prospectively recorded. The prognostic value of the following parameters for the onset of chronic recurrent encephalopathy after TIPS was evaluated: age, presence of encephalopathy before TIPS, alcoholism, Pugh score, and loss of portal perfusion before TIPS. The independent prognostic value of each variable was tested with a multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in terms of age, incidence of prior episodes of hepatic encephalopathy, and portacaval gradient before and after the procedure; however, liver failure was more severe in patients in group 2 (Pugh score: 9.2 +/- 1.9 vs 10.3 +/- 1.7). The 3-yr survival was identical for both groups; 25% of the 200 patients in group 1 developed chronic encephalopathy as compared to 6% of the 31 patients in group 2 (p = 0.03). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that loss of portal perfusion and age >65 yr were the only independent predictors of the onset of post-TIPS chronic encephalopathy (odds ratios 0.24 and 1.98, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cirrhotic patients with loss of portal perfusion before TIPS were protected against post-TIPS chronic hepatic encephalopathy despite a more severe liver dysfunction at baseline. The only other independent predictive factor for the onset of this complication was age.     

Hemodynamic effects of propranolol and nitrates in cirrhotics with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt

BACKGROUND: The combination of tailored TIPS with vasoactive drugs might allow reduction of the rate of subsequent shunt-related sequelae. METHODS: We studied cirrhotic patients 8 weeks (median) after TIPS insertion (8-10 mm) for variceal bleeding. Nitrate (0.1 mg/kg) and propranolol (0.15 mg/kg) alone or combined (same dosages) were infused (I h) sequentially at 1-h intervals (n = 17). Similarly, propranolol was randomly compared to placebo (NaCl, n = 14). We measured mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg), heart rate (HR) and portal pressure gradient (PPG: portal minus central venous pressure) prior to and after drugs. RESULTS: Propranolol reduced PPG (mean +/- s, mmHg) significantly (14.8 +/- 3.7 versus 12.1 +/- 3.7; -21% +/- 10%; P < 0.001), while nitrates alone (14.3 +/- 3.4 versus 13.7 +/- 3.4; -11% +/- 3%; P=0.06) or nitrates plus propranolol (12.9 +/- 4 versus 12.4 +/- 4; -7% +/- 8%; P=0.2) induced only minor additive effects on portal pressure. However, nitrate reduced MAP (P < 0.001) and increased HR (P < 0.01), whereas propranolol reduced only HR (P < 0.001) with unchanged MAP, and the combination decreased MAP (P < 0.001). Compared to placebo (no effect), propranolol decreased PPG (14.4 +/- 5.6 versus 11.1 +/- 5.5; -23% +/- 11%; P < 0.001) and HR (P < 0.001). Overall, most patients (92%) responded to propranolol and 54% showed a marked PPG decrease (>20%). CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol significantly reduced portal pressure in cirrhotic patients after TIPS, whereas nitrates induced only minor benefit. TIPS-treated patients might therefore profit from additive propranolol therapy allowing limited shunts to be applied initially and/or to reduce the need for TIPS revisions in the case of shunt-dysfunction during follow-up.     

Prognostic role of the initial portal pressure gradient reduction after TIPS in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic relevance of the portal pressure gradient (PPG) before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) insertion in patients with liver cirrhosis and recurrent oesophageal variceal bleeding. METHODS: 118 cirrhotic patients (Child A/B/C, 41/56/21; Child score, 7.7+/-2.0; baseline PPG, 21.8+/-4.7 mmHg) underwent TIPS for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the independent determinants of rebleeding and survival. The estimated rebleeding rate and the estimated survival were compared by log-rank testing. RESULTS: TIPS insertion reduced the PPG by 53.2+/-17.7%. During follow-up 21 patients suffered significant rebleeding (17.8%); bleeding-related mortality was 3.4% (four patients). The median survival [95% confidence intervals (CI)] was 48.2 (39.8; 60.8) months. The multivariate Cox model identified creatinine as the only independent predictor of survival, and the initial decrease of the PPG after TIPS as the only independent predictor of rebleeding. PPG before TIPS (21.8+/-4.7 mmHg) and the gradient at the time of rebleeding (22.0+/-2.9 mmHg) did not differ significantly. Patients with an initial decrease of the PPG after TIPS <30% were at the highest risk for rebleeding. Patients with an initial decrease of the PPG >60% rarely suffered from rebleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The initial decrease in the PPG after TIPS is a predictor for the risk of rebleeding but not for survival after TIPS. For that reason, in patients undergoing TIPS placement for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from oesophageal varices, an initial reduction of the PPG of 30-50% should be attempted.     

Effects of ascites resolution after successful TIPS on nutrition in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites

OBJECTIVE: Malnutrition is common in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and refractory ascites. The use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) is effective in eliminating ascites. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of TIPS and resolution of refractory ascites on the nutritional status of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients with refractory ascites and a Pugh score of 9.0+/-0.5 had a TIPS insertion. Biochemical data, resting energy expenditure (REE), total body nitrogen (TBN), body potassium (TBK), body fat (TBF), muscle force (MF), and food intake were recorded before TIPS, and at 3 and 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: Ten patients completed the study. Baseline values for REE, TBN, TBF, MF, and energy intake were below normal at baseline. There was a significant increase in dry weight, TBN, and REE at 3 and 12 months compared with baseline. TBF improved significantly at 12 months. There was a trend toward an increase in energy intake (p = 0.072). There was no change in protein intake, TBK, MF, and Pugh score. CONCLUSION: In cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites, resolution of the ascites after TIPS placement resulted in improvement of several nutritional parameters, especially for body composition.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) versus endoscopic variceal ligation in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a new therapeutic modality for variceal bleeding. In this study we compared the two year survival and rebleeding rates in cirrhotic patients treated by either variceal band ligation or TIPS for variceal bleeding. METHODS: Eighty cirrhotic patients (Pugh score 7-12) with variceal bleeding were randomly allocated to TIPS (n=41) or ligation (n=39), 24 hours after control of bleeding. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 581 days in the ligation group and 678 days in the TIPS group. The two year survival rate was 57% in the TIPS group and 56% in the ligation group (NS); the incidence of variceal rebleeding after two years was 18% in the TIPS group and 66% in the ligation group (p<0.001). Uncontrolled rebleeding occurred in 11 patients in the ligation group (eight were rescued by emergency TIPS) but in none of the TIPS group. The incidence of encephalopathy at two years was 47% in the TIPS group and 44% in the ligation group (NS). CONCLUSIONS: TIPS did not increase the two year survival rate compared with variceal band ligation after variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with moderate or severe liver failure. It significantly reduced the incidence of variceal rebleeding without increasing the rate of encephalopathy.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt prior to cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Because of the increased complications associated with cardiac surgery in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, various preoperative preparations have been utilised. In order to reduce the bleeding risk by decompressing portosystemic collaterals and to correct the fluid shift, we performed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in two patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension prior to major cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Both patients had satisfactory surgical outcome with no bleeding complications. One patient developed hepatic encephalopathy which was managed medically. We believe that preoperative TIPS benefits the patient with cirrhosis and portal hypertension undergoing cardiac surgery by decreasing the major surgical complications through improvement of fluid imbalance and reduction of the bleeding risk. Because of the risks of TIPS, such as encephalopathy and liver failure, preoperative TIPS placement must be reserved for patients with fluid shift or high risk criteria of bleeding.     

Hemodynamic Effects of Propranolol and Nitrates in Cirrhotics with Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Stent-Shunt

Background: The combination of tailored TIPS with vasoactive drugs might allow reduction of the rate of subsequent shunt-related sequelae. Methods: We studied cirrhotic patients 8 weeks (median) after TIPS insertion (8-10 mm) for variceal bleeding. Nitrate (0.1 mg/kg) and propranolol (0.15 mg/kg) alone or combined (same dosages) were infused (1 h) sequentially at 1-h intervals ( n = 17). Similarly, propranolol was randomly compared to placebo (NaCl, n = 14). We measured mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg), heart rate (HR) and portal pressure gradient (PPG: portal minus central venous pressure) prior to and after drugs. Results: Propranolol reduced PPG (mean ± s , mmHg) significantly (14.8 ± 3.7 versus 12.1 ± 3.7; -21% ± 10%; P < 0.001), while nitrates alone (14.3 ± 3.4 versus 13.7 ± 3.4; -11% ± 3%; P = 0.06) or nitrates plus propranolol (12.9 ± 4 versus 12.4 ± 4; -7% ± 8%; P = 0.2) induced only minor additive effects on portal pressure. However, nitrate reduced MAP ( P < 0.001) and increased HR ( P < 0.01), whereas propranolol reduced only HR ( P < 0.001) with unchanged MAP, and the combination decreased MAP ( P < 0.001). Compared to placebo (no effect), propranolol decreased PPG (14.4 ± 5.6 versus 11.1 ± 5.5; -23% ± 11%; P < 0.001) and HR ( P < 0.001). Overall, most patients (92%) responded to propranolol and 54% showed a marked PPG decrease (>20%). Conclusions: Propranolol significantly reduced portal pressure in cirrhotic patients after TIPS, whereas nitrates induced only minor benefit. TIPS-treated patients might therefore profit from additive propranolol therapy allowing limited shunts to be applied initially and/or to reduce the need for TIPS revisions in the case of shunt-dysfunction during follow-up.     

TIPS versus drug therapy in preventing variceal rebleeding in advanced cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial

Prevention of variceal rebleeding is mandatory in cirrhotic patients. We compared the efficacy, safety, and cost of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) versus pharmacologic therapy in preventing variceal rebleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis. A total of 91 Child-Pugh class B/C cirrhotic patients surviving their first episode of variceal bleeding were randomized to receive TIPS (n = 47) or drug therapy (propranolol + isosorbide-5-mononitrate) (n = 44) to prevent variceal rebleeding. Mean follow-up was 15 months. Rebleeding occurred in 6 (13%) TIPS-treated patients versus 17 (39%) drug-treated patients (P =.007). The 2-year rebleeding probability was 13% versus 49% (P =.01). A similar number of reinterventions were required in the 2 groups; these were mainly angioplasty +/- restenting in the TIPS group (90 of 98) and endoscopic therapy for rebleeding in the medical group (45 of 62) (not significant). Encephalopathy was more frequent in TIPS than in drug-treated patients (38% vs. 14%, P =.007). Child-Pugh class improved more frequently in drug-treated than in TIPS-treated patients (72% vs. 45%; P =.04). The 2-year survival probability was identical (72%). The identified cost of therapy was double for TIPS-treated patients. In summary, medical therapy was less effective than TIPS in preventing rebleeding. However, it caused less encephalopathy, identical survival, and more frequent improvement in Child-Pugh class with lower costs than TIPS in high-risk cirrhotic patients. This suggests that TIPS should not be used as a first-line treatment, but as a rescue for failures of medical/endoscopic treatments (first-option therapies).     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in liver transplant recipients

AIM： To evaluate the efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts （TIPSs） after liver transplantation （LT）. METHODS： Between November 1996 and December 2005, 10 patients with severe recurrent hepatitis C virus infection （n = 4）, ductopenic rejection （n = 5） or portal vein thrombosis （n = 1） were included in this analysis. Eleven TIPSs （one patient underwent two TIPS procedures） were placed for management of therapy-refractory ascites （n = 7）, hydrothorax （n = 2） or bleeding from colonic varices （n = 1）. The median time interval between LT and TIPS placement was 15 （4-158） mo. RESULTS： TIPS placement was successful in all patients. The mean portosystemic pressure gradient was reduced from 12.5 to 8.7 mmHg. Complete and partial remission could be achieved in 43% and 29% of patients with ascites. Both patients with hydrothorax did not respond to TIPS. No recurrent bleeding was seen in the patient with colonic varices. Nine of 10 patients died during the study period. Only one of two patients, who underwent retransplantation after the TIPS procedure, survived. The median survival period after TIPS placement was 3.3 （range 0.4-20） too. The majority of patients died from sepsis with multiorgan failure. CONCLUSION： Indications for TIPS and technical performance in LT patients correspond to those in non-transplanted patients. At least partial control of therapy-refractory ascites and variceal bleeding could be achieved in most patients. Nevertheless, survival rates were disappointing, most probably because of the advanced stages of liver disease at the time of TIPS placement and the high risk of sepsis as a consequence of immunosuppression.     

Management of the cirrhotic patient that needs surgery

Opinion statement Conditions that necessitate surgery frequently arise in patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Because cirrhosis has the ability to cause physiologic derangements in every organ system in the body, clinicians face significant challenges in preoperative preparation of the patient with cirrhosis in order to decrease postoperative morbidity and mortality. Emergent operations add an extra dimension of complexity to the clinical picture, due to limited preoperative time to prepare the patient with cirrhosis for surgery. In cases of severely decompensated cirrhosis, clinicians should have in their armamentarium possible alternatives to surgery that can be used to temporize the emergent nature of the disease and improve patient outcomes. The classification of cirrhotic liver disease by Child and Turcotte was initially utilized to predict mortality in patients undergoing surgically placed shunts for portal hypertensive bleeding. Subsequent studies have pointed to the fact that other general and thoracic surgery procedures can be assigned predicted mortality rates according to a similar classification scheme, the modified Child-Pugh score. Patients with cirrhosis facing surgery should undergo a careful history and physical examination and should be accurately placed into a designated Child-Pugh category. Because the modified Child-Pugh class is the most reliable determinant of postoperative morbidity and mortality, every attempt should be made to upgrade a patient’s class in a favorable direction prior to surgery. Patients should be carefully evaluated for the presence of ascites and dietary alterations. In addition, medical management with diuretics should be employed to prevent postoperative ascites leak and possible infectious complications including bacterial peritonitis. Perhaps one of the most feared complications in the patient with cirrhosis facing surgery is hemorrhage. Because the liver is vital in maintenance of coagulation homeostasis, several pharmacologic adjuncts may be administered to correct any coagulopathy in the peri-operative period. Several diseases such as cholelithiasis and peptic ulcer disease are known to be more prevalent in the cirrhotic patient, and clinicians treating these diseases should have a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertensive bleeding that are considered good surgical candidates (ie, Child-Pugh class A) may benefit from surgical portasystemic shunt in contrast to angiographically placed portacaval shunt (ie, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS]) due to the lack of durable patency and cost effectiveness in the latter. In patients with cirrhosis awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation, TIPS may be a lifesaving temporizing technique that is utilized as a bridge to transplantation.     

Prognosis of patients undergoing salvage TIPS is still poor in the preemptive TIPS era

BackgroundSalvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are associated with poor prognosis, especially in patients with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis. Since preemptive TIPS improved prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in those patients, recourse to salvage TIPS may now affect patients with a better prognosis.AimTo assess the impact of the preemptive TIPS policy on outcomes after salvage TIPS placement.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective monocentric study on cirrhotic patients undergoing salvage TIPS with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents from 2002 to 2017 (period 1 until February 2011; period 2 after the preemptive TIPS policy in March 2011). The primary endpoint was one-year transplant-free survival.ResultsWe included 106 patients (period 1/2 = 53/53 patients, male gender 82%, age 54 ± 9 years, alcoholic cirrhosis 70%, Child-Pugh score B/C 94%). One-year transplant-free survival was 46.0% during period 1 compared to 40.2% during period 2 (p = 0.65). Amongst 61 patients with history of variceal bleeding, 32 (52.5%) had an inadequate secondary prophylaxis, including 19 (59.4%) with a previous indication of preemptive TIPS. One-year transplant-free survival was 33.2% if inadequate secondary prophylaxis vs 65.2% if adequate (p = 0.008). Independent factors associated with survival were a lower Child-Pugh or MELD score, infection, failure to control bleeding, and hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS.ConclusionPrognosis after salvage TIPS remained poor in our series. Optimizing secondary prophylaxis, including preemptive TIPS placement, should be the main concern to improve prognosis.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in liver transplant (LT) recipients with refractory ascites/variceal bleeding and to compare the observed outcomes with those obtained in cirrhotic controls. Methods: Clinical features of 14 LT recipients referred for TIPS placement between August 1985 and September 2006 were reviewed and compared with published series and 28 cirrhotic control patients undergoing TIPS. Results: The median age of the 14 LT recipients was 52 years, 57% had chronic hepatitis C virus and the median time from LT to TIPS placement was 46 months. Portal vein thromboses in two patients and a procedural complication in another patient precluded TIPS deployment. Among the 11 patients who completed TIPS, the mean hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly reduced post‐TIPS (18.3 ± 6.1 to 9.0 ± 3.5 mmHg, P<0.01). However, only 50% of the patients with varices had no further bleeding and 57% of the refractory ascites patients required no further paracentesis. In addition to a single peri‐procedural death and renal failure in three others, four patients (29%) developed infection and nine (82%) developed new onset or worsening encephalopathy at a median of 11 days post‐TIPS. The 1‐year patient survival of 14% was substantially lower than that observed in other series of LT recipients (57–67%) as well as the matched cirrhotic control group undergoing TIPS (58%). Conclusion: The frequent morbidity noted in LT recipients undergoing TIPS, coupled with the low 1‐year patient survival, demonstrates that portal decompression provides only marginal short‐term benefit in the absence of retransplantation.     

Predictors of mortality after transjugular portosystemic shunt

AIM:To investigate if echocardiographic and hemodynamic determinations obtained at the time of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS)can provide prognostic information that will enhance risk stratification of patients.METHODS:We reviewed medical records of 467 patients who underwent TIPS between July 2003 and December 2011 at our institution.We recorded information regarding patient demographics,underlying liver disease,indication for TIPS,baseline laboratory values,hemodynamic determinations at the time of TIPS,and echocardiographic measurements both before and after TIPS.We recorded patient comorbidities that may affect hemodynamic and echocardiographic determinations.We also calculated Model for Endstage Liver Disease(MELD)score and Child Turcotte Pugh(CTP)class.The following pre-and post-TIPS echocardiographic determinations were recorded:Left ventricular ejection fraction,right ventricular(RV)systolic pressure,subjective RV dilation,and subjective RV function.We recorded the following hemodynamic measurements:Right atrial(RA)pressure before and after TIPS,inferior vena cava pressure before and after TIPS,free hepatic vein pressure,portal vein pressure before and after TIPS,and hepatic venous pressure gradient(HVPG).RESULTS:We reviewed 418 patients with portal hypertension undergoing TIPS.RA pressure increased by a mean ± SD of 4.8 ± 3.9 mmH g(P 0.001),HVPG decreased by 6.8 ± 3.5 mmH g(P 0.001).In multivariate linear regression analysis,a higher MELD score,lower platelet count,splenectomy and a higher portal vein pressure were independent predictors of higher RA pressure(R = 0.55).Three variables predicted 3-mo mortality after TIPS in a multivariate analysis:Age,MELD score,and CTP grade C.Change in the RA pressure after TIPS predicted long-term mortality(per 1 mm Hg change,HR = 1.03,95%CI:1.01-1.06,P 0.012).CONCLUSION:RA pressure increased immediately after TIPS particularly in patients with worse liver function,portal hypertension,emergent TIPS placement and history of splenectomy.The increase in RA pressure after TIPS was associated with increased mortality.Age,splenectomy,MELD score and CTP grade were independent predictors of long-term mortality after TIPS.     

经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流术治疗肝硬化静脉曲张出血预后因素分析

目的 分析经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流(TIPS)术治疗肝硬化静脉曲张出血患者的预后因素.方法 收集2003年1月至2008年12月162例行TIPS术的肝硬化静脉曲张出血患者基本资料、术前7 d内相关生化指标,定期随访观察术后情况和生存期资料.Cox回归模型评估影响预后生存的指标.结果 TIPS术成功率99%(161/162).中位随访时间21个月.Child-Pugh评分和血小板计数与生存密切相关(P值分别=0.003和0.024).Child-Pughr评分<9分者的累积生存率[75%(102/136)]高于评分≥9分者[50%(13/26),χ2=9.12,P=0.003].血小板计数>47×109/L者的累积生存率[74%(82/112)]高于≤47×109/L者[66%(33/50),χ2=4.528,P=0.033].肝功能Child-Pugh A、B、C级术后1年累积生存率分别为92%、85%、55%.结论 Child-Pugh评分和血小板计数是预测TIPS术治疗肝硬化静脉曲张出血者生存情况的独立因素,当ChildPugh评分≥9分和(或)血小板计数≤47×109/L时术后危险性增加.

Abstract：

Objective To analyze the prognostic factors in treating variceal hemorrhage patients of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).Methods From January 2003 to December 2008, the data of 162 variceal hemorrhage patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension treated with TIPS was collected, which included basic information, biochemical examination results within 7 days before the operation, regular follow-up observation after the surgery and survival data. The survival prognostic indexes were assessed with Cox regression model. Results The successful rate of TIPS was 99% (161/162). The median follow up duration was 21 months. Child-Pugh score and blood platelet count (PLT) were closely correlated with survival (P = 0. 003 and 0. 024). The total cumulative survival rate in patients with Child-Pugh score below nine (75%, 102/136) was higher than over nine (50%, 13/26) (χ2 = 9. 12,P=0. 003).The total cumulative survival rate of patients with PLT count over 47 ×109/L (74%, 82/112) was higher than below 47 × 109/L(66 %, 33/50, χ2 =4. 528, P = 0. 033). The one year after operation cumulative survival rate of liver function Child-Pugh class A, B, and C was 92%, 85%, 55% respectively. Conclusion Child-Pugh score and platelet count are independent predictable factors for the survival of variceal hemorrhage patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension treated by TIPS. The risk increase after operation when Child-Pugh score over 9 and/or PLT count less 47×109 /L.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement for refractory ascites: a single-centre experience

Abstract

Background. The presence of refractory ascites is a common indication for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Different models have been proposed for the prediction of survival after TIPS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive factors associated with patients' survival after TIPS placement for refractory ascites. Methods. Data from all consecutive patients undergoing TIPS placement in our center for refractory ascites between February 2003 and January 2008 were prospectively recorded. Results. Seventy-three patients (52M/21F; 57 ± 10 years) met the inclusion criteria; mean follow-up was 17 ± 2 months. Mean MELD value, before TIPS placement, was 15.7 ± 5.3. TIPS placement led to an effective resolution of refractory ascites in 54% of patients (n = 40) with no significant increase in severe portosystemic encephalopathy. The 1-year survival rate observed was 65.7%, while the overall mortality was 23.3% (n = 17) with a mean survival of 17 ± 14 months. MELD score (B = 0.161, p = 0.042), basal AST (B = 0.020, p = 0.090), and pre-TIPS HVPG (B = 0.016, p = 0.093) were independent predictors of overall mortality, while MELD (B = 0.419, p = 0.018) and HVPG (B = 0.223, p = 0.060) independently predicted 1-year survival. ROC curves identified MELD ≥ 19 and HVPG ≥ 25 mmHg as the best cut-off points for the prediction of 1-year mortality. Conclusions. TIPS is an effective treatment for refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients, leading to an effective ascites control in more than half patients. Improvement in patients' selection criteria could lead to better outcome and survival after this procedure. Liver function (MELD), presence of active necroinflammation (AST), and portal hypertension (HVPG) are independent predictors of patients' outcome after TIPS.     

Parallel transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for controlling portal hypertension complications in cirrhotic patients

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of a second parallel transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to reduce portal venous pressure and control complications of portal hypertension.METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2012, 10 cirrhotic patients were treated for complications of portal hypertension. The demographic data, operative data, postoperative recovery data, hemodynamic data, and complications were analyzed.RESULTS: Ten patients underwent a primary and parallel TIPS. Technical success rate was 100% with no technical complications. The mean duration of the first operation was 89.20 ± 29.46 min and the second operation was 57.0 ± 12.99 min. The mean portal system pressure decreased from 54.80 ± 4.16 mmHg to 39.0 ± 3.20 mmHg after the primary TIPS and from 44.40 ± 3.95 mmHg to 26.10 ± 4.07 mmHg after the parallel TIPS creation. The mean portosystemic pressure gradient decreased from 43.80 ± 6.18 mmHg to 31.90 ± 2.85 mmHg after the primary TIPS and from 35.60 ± 2.72 mmHg to 15.30 ± 3.27 mmHg after the parallel TIPS creation. Clinical improvement was seen in all patients after the parallel TIPS creation. One patient suffered from transient grade I hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after the primary TIPS and four patients experienced transient grade I-II after the parallel TIPS procedure. Mean hospital stay after the first and second operations were 15.0 ± 3.71 d and 16.90 ± 5.11 d (P = 0.014), respectively. After a mean 14.0 ± 3.13 mo follow-up, ascites and bleeding were well controlled and no stenosis of the stents was found.CONCLUSION: Parallel TIPS is an effective approach for controlling portal hypertension complications.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for palliative treatment of portal hypertension secondary to portal vein tumor thrombosis

AIM: To evaluate the palliative therapeutic effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) complicated by portal hypertension. METHODS: We performed TIPS for 14 patients with PVTT due to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Of the 14 patients, 8 patients had complete occlusion of the main portal vein, 6 patients had incomplete thrombosis, and 5 patients had portal vein cavernous transformation. Clinical characteristics and average survival time of 14 patients were analysed. Portal vein pressure, ascites, diarrhoea, and variceal bleeding and circumference of abdomen were assessed before and after TIPS. RESULTS: TIPS was successful in 10 cases, and the successful rate was about 71%. The mean portal vein pressure was reduced from 37.2 mmHg to 18.2 mmHg. After TIPS, the ascites decreased, hemorrhage stopped and the clinical symptoms disappeared in the 10 cases. The average survival time was 132.3 d. The procedure failed in 4 cases because of cavernous transformation in portal vein and severe cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: TIPS is an effective palliative treatment to control hemorrhage and ascites due to HCC complicated by PVTT.     

TIPS implantation raises leptin levels in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Increased leptin levels in patients with liver cirrhosis are postulated to result in malnutrition and increased energy expenditure. Since cirrhotic patients show improved nutritional status after a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS), it was the aim of this study to evaluate plasma leptin levels and their influence on nutritional status prior to and after the TIPS procedure. We evaluated plasma leptin levels, body mass index (BMI), Child-Pugh score and pertinent biochemical parameters in 31 patients (19 men and 12 women) with severe complications of liver cirrhosis (74% ethyltoxic men, 50% ethyltoxic in women), prior to and after TIPS. Nineteen cirrhotic patients without TIPS served as controls. In women ascitic-free BMI significantly increased (from 22.8 +/- 4.6 kg/m2 to 23.9 +/- 4.9; p = 0.004 three months after TIPS), whereas in men only a tendency toward higher values (26.1 +/- 4.7 vs. 26.7 +/- 4.4; p = 0.28) was found. Analysis of peripheral venous leptin concentrations before and three months after TIPS revealed a significant increase in women (11.9 +/- 8.8 ng/ml vs. 18.6 +/- 14.9; p = 0.009) and in men (7.7 +/- 6.2 ng/ml vs. 12.2 +/- 9.0; p = 0.005). In addition, the leptin-BMI ratio increase significantly in women and men three months after TIPS implantation (women 0.49 +/- 0.29 vs. 0.73 +/- 0.52; p = 0.017; men 0.28 +/- 0.22 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.28; p = 0.002). On the other hand, patients without TIPS implantation showed no significant alterations of BMI and peripheral venous leptin concentrations. After TIPS implantation in liver cirrhotic patients, leptin levels were increased and the nutritional status improved. Therefore, our analysis suggests that in patients with predominantly ethyltoxic liver cirrhosis, elevated leptin levels are not a major reason for poorer body composition.     

肝静脉压力梯度指导下食管静脉曲张再出血预防方法选择

目的肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)是肝硬化病情评估、判断预后的重要指标,本研究探索依据患者不同HVPG值采取不同术式降低肝硬化食管静脉曲张患者再出血率的价值。 方法收集2010年4月至2019年10月既往有消化道出血病史、行HVPG测定的270例肝硬化食管静脉曲张患者为观察对象。其中130例患者(HVPG指导组)根据HVPG值选择不同术式进行个体化治疗：10 mmHg≤HVPG≤16 mmHg的患者采用内镜下食管静脉曲张套扎术(EVL)联合非选择性β受体阻断剂(NSBB)治疗;16 mmHg20 mmHg的患者则使用经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗。另外140例患者(非HVPG指导组)均采用EVL联合NSBB治疗。观察主要终点为门脉高压相关再出血,次要终点为死亡。 结果中位随访时间为26个月。HVPG指导组再出血率低于非HVPG指导组(12.31%比30.00%,P＝0.000 88),但两组生存率无明显差异(93.08%比91.43%,P＝0.71)。进一步亚组分析显示,对于16 mmHg20 mmHg的患者,TIPS治疗的再出血率低于EVL＋NSBB治疗(6.12%比36.36%,P＝0.000 88),两组生存率仍无明显差异。 结论基于HVPG的个体化治疗具有重要理论和临床意义,根据HVPG的风险分层,个体化选择食管静脉曲张出血二级预防治疗方案(EVL＋NSBB、PTVE或TIPS)可降低静脉再出血率,为肝硬化患者的个体化治疗提供新的研究思路。     

Hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P450 3A activity in cirrhosis: effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is performed to treat some complications of cirrhosis. This study investigated the effects of cirrhosis and TIPS on intestinal and hepatic cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) activity. Nine volunteers were cirrhotic patients with TIPS, 9 were cirrhotic controls (matched for sex, age, etiology, and Child-Pugh class), and 9 were sex- and age-matched healthy volunteers. Simultaneous doses of midazolam were given intravenously (0.05 mg/kg) and orally (3 mg of [15N3]midazolam). Peripheral and portal venous blood samples were assayed for midazolam and [15N3]midazolam. The systemic clearance of midazolam was significantly greater (P <.05) in healthy volunteers (0.42 +/- 0.10 L x h(-1) x kg(-1)) compared with cirrhotic controls (0.20 +/- 0.05) and with cirrhotic patients with TIPS (0.21 +/- 0.09). Hepatic availability followed the same trend. The bioavailability of midazolam was significantly higher (P <.05) in cirrhotic patients with TIPS (0.76 +/- 0.20) compared with cirrhotic controls (0.27 +/- 0.14) and with healthy volunteers (0.30 +/- 0.10). The intestinal availability was significantly greater (P <.05) in cirrhotic patients with TIPS (0.83 +/- 0.17) compared with cirrhotic controls (0.32 +/- 0.16) and with healthy volunteers (0.42+/-0.15). As expected, hepatic CYP3A activity was reduced in cirrhosis. However, in cirrhotic patients with TIPS, there was a marked loss in first-pass metabolism of midazolam as a result of diminished intestinal CYP3A activity.