共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
Joseph T. Giacino Douglas I. Katz Nicholas D. Schiff John Whyte Eric J. Ashman Stephen Ashwal Richard Barbano Flora M. Hammond Steven Laureys Geoffrey S.F. Ling Risa Nakase-Richardson Ronald T. Seel Stuart Yablon Thomas S.D. Getchius Gary S. Gronseth Melissa J. Armstrong 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(9):1699-1709
Objective
To update the 1995 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice parameter on persistent vegetative state and the 2002 case definition on minimally conscious state (MCS) and provide care recommendations for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC).Methods
Recommendations were based on systematic review evidence, related evidence, care principles, and inferences using a modified Delphi consensus process according to the AAN 2011 process manual, as amended.Recommendations
Clinicians should identify and treat confounding conditions, optimize arousal, and perform serial standardized assessments to improve diagnostic accuracy in adults and children with prolonged DoC (Level B). Clinicians should counsel families that for adults, MCS (vs vegetative state [VS]/ unresponsive wakefulness syndrome [UWS]) and traumatic (vs nontraumatic) etiology are associated with more favorable outcomes (Level B). When prognosis is poor, long-term care must be discussed (Level A), acknowledging that prognosis is not universally poor (Level B). Structural MRI, SPECT, and the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised can assist prognostication in adults (Level B); no tests are shown to improve prognostic accuracy in children. Pain always should be assessed and treated (Level B) and evidence supporting treatment approaches discussed (Level B). Clinicians should prescribe amantadine (100–200 mg bid) for adults with traumatic VS/UWS or MCS (4–16 weeks post injury) to hasten functional recovery and reduce disability early in recovery (Level B). Family counseling concerning children should acknowledge that natural history of recovery, prognosis, and treatment are not established (Level B). Recent evidence indicates that the term chronic VS/UWS should replace permanent VS, with duration specified (Level B). Additional recommendations are included. 相似文献2.
3.
Emilio Portaccio Azzurra Morrocchesi Anna Maria Romoli Bahia Hakiki Maria Pia Taglioli Elena Lippi Martina Di Renzone Antonello Grippo Claudio Macchi 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(5):914-919
Objectives
To evaluate the prognostic utility of serial assessment on the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised (CRS-R) during the first 4 weeks of intensive rehabilitation in patients surviving a severe brain injury.Design
Prospective cohort study.Setting
An intensive rehabilitation unit.Participants
Patients (N=110) consecutively admitted to the intensive rehabilitation unit. Inclusion criteria were (1) a diagnosis of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) caused by an acquired brain injury, and (2) aged >18 years.Interventions
All patients underwent clinical evaluations using the Italian version of the CRS-R during the first month of hospital stay.Main Outcome Measures
Behavioral classification on the CRS-R and the score on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at final discharge. Patients transitioning from UWS to MCS or emergence from MCS (E-MCS), and from MCS to E-MCS were classified as patients with improved responsiveness (IR).Results
After a mean ± SD hospital stay of 5.3±2.7 months, 59 of 110 patients (53.6%) achieved IR. In the multivariable analysis, a higher CRS-R score change at week 4 (odds ratio =1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49–2.66; P<.001) was the only significant predictor of IR at discharge. Fifty-three patients (48.2%) were classified as severely impaired at discharge (GOS=3). In the multivariable analysis, higher GOS scores were related to a higher CRS-R score at admission (B=.051; 95% CI, .027–.074; P<.001), a higher CRS-R score change at week 4 (B=.087; 95% CI, .064–.110; P<.001), and an absence of severe infections (B=–.477; 95% CI, –.778 to –.176; P=.002).Conclusions
An improvement on the total CRS-R score and on different subscales across the first 4 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation discriminates patients who will have a better outcome at discharge, providing information for rehabilitation planning and for communication with patients and their caregivers. 相似文献4.
Gabrielle Alvarez Stacy J. Suskauer Beth Slomine 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2019,100(4):687-694
Objectives
To investigate behavioral and demographic features of levels of consciousness in young children with brain injury, including the classifications of consciousness: conscious state (CS), minimally conscious state (MCS), and vegetative state (VS), and to investigate the course of recovery in children with disorders of consciousness (DOC).Design
Retrospective chart review and post hoc analysis.Setting
Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation unit.Participants
Children aged 6 months to 5 years (N=54) admitted for inpatient rehabilitation directly from an acute care hospital following new neurologic injury from 2011 to 2016.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
Clinically abstracted behavioral features of DOC and levels of consciousness at admission and discharge, based on established guidelines from the Aspen Neurobehavioral Conference Workgroup.Results
Children in MCS were younger than children in CS. Commonly observed behaviors in children in VS were mouth movements or vocalizations, flexion withdrawal or motor posturing, visual or auditory startle, and localization to sound. Common features of MCS were contingent affect, visual fixation or pursuit, automatic motor behavior, and contingent communicative intent. No children in MCS showed command following or intelligible verbalizations. All children in CS showed functional object use, while functional communication was observed in a subset. By discharge, more than half of children in VS emerged to MCS, and a third emerged from MCS to CS. No child emerged from VS to CS.Conclusions
Visual and motor skills may be most applicable, and language-based skills may be least applicable for the assessment of DOC in very young children. Accurate classifications of consciousness may have important prognostic implications, and additional research is needed to develop clear guidelines for assessment of DOC in this population. 相似文献5.
Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility.
Objective
To determine the measurement properties and diagnostic utility of the JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).Design
Analysis of interrater and test-retest reliability, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy.Setting
Acute inpatient brain injury rehabilitation hospital.Participants
Convenience sample of 80 patients with severe acquired brain injury admitted to an inpatient Coma Intervention Program with a diagnosis of either vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS).Interventions
Not applicable.Main outcome measures
The CRS-R, the JFK Coma Recovery Scale (CRS), and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS).Results
Interrater and test-retest reliability were high for CRS-R total scores. Subscale analysis showed moderate to high interrater and test-retest agreement although systematic differences in scoring were noted on the visual and oromotor/verbal subscales. CRS-R total scores correlated significantly with total scores on the CRS and DRS indicating acceptable concurrent validity. The CRS-R was able to distinguish 10 patients in an MCS who were otherwise misclassified as in a VS by the DRS.Conclusions
The CRS-R can be administered reliably by trained examiners and repeated measurements yield stable estimates of patient status. CRS-R subscale scores demonstrated good agreement across raters and ratings but should be used cautiously because some scores were underrepresented in the current study. The CRS-R appears capable of differentiating patients in an MCS from those in a VS. 相似文献6.
Carly S. Rivers Nader Fallah Vanessa K. Noonan David G. Whitehurst Carolyn E. Schwartz Joel A. Finkelstein B. Catharine Craven Karen Ethans Colleen O&#x;Connell B. Catherine Truchon Chester Ho A. Gary Linassi Christine Short Eve Tsai Brian Drew Henry Ahn Marcel F. Dvorak Jér?me Paquet Luc Noreau 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(3):443-451
Objective
To analyze relations among injury, demographic, and environmental factors on function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and life satisfaction in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).Design
Prospective observational registry cohort study.Setting
Specialized acute and rehabilitation SCI centers.Participants
Participants (N=340) from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) who were prospectively recruited from 2004 to 2014 were included. The model cohort participants were 79.1% men, with a mean age of 41.6±17.3 years. Of the participants, 34.7% were motor/sensory complete (ASIA Impairment Scale [AIS] grade A).Interventions
None.Main Outcome Measures
Path analysis was used to determine relations among SCI severity (AIS grade and anatomic level [cervical/thoracolumbar]), age at injury, education, number of health conditions, functional independence (FIM motor score), HRQoL (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [Version 2] Physical Component Score [PCS] and Mental Component Score [MCS]), and life satisfaction (Life Satisfaction-11 [LiSat-11]). Model fit was assessed using recommended published indices.Results
Goodness of fit of the model was supported by all indices, indicating the model results closely matched the RHSCIR data. Higher age, higher severity injuries, cervical injuries, and more health conditions negatively affected FIM motor score, whereas employment had a positive effect. Higher age, less education, more severe injuries (AIS grades A–C), and more health conditions negatively correlated with PCS (worse physical health). More health conditions were negatively correlated with a lower MCS (worse mental health), however were positively associated with reduced function. Being married and having higher function positively affected Lisat-11, but more health conditions had a negative effect.Conclusions
Complex interactions and enduring effects of health conditions after SCI have a negative effect on function, HRQoL, and life satisfaction. Modeling relations among these types of concepts will inform clinicians how to positively effect outcomes after SCI (eg, development of screening tools and protocols for managing individuals with traumatic SCI who have multiple health conditions). 相似文献7.
8.
N. Erkut Kucukboyaci Coralynn Long Michelle Smith Joseph F. Rath Tamara Bushnik 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(11):2365-2369
Objective
To analyze the complex relation between various social indicators that contribute to socioeconomic status and health care barriers.Design
Cluster analysis of historical patient data obtained from inpatient visits.Setting
Inpatient rehabilitation unit in a large urban university hospital.Participants
Adult patients (N=148) receiving acute inpatient care, predominantly for closed head injury.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
We examined the membership of patients with traumatic brain injury in various “vulnerable group” clusters (eg, homeless, unemployed, racial/ethnic minority) and characterized the rehabilitation outcomes of patients (eg, duration of stay, changes in FIM scores between admission to inpatient stay and discharge).Results
The cluster analysis revealed 4 major clusters (ie, clusters A–D) separated by vulnerable group memberships, with distinct durations of stay and FIM gains during their stay. Cluster B, the largest cluster and also consisting of mostly racial/ethnic minorities, had the shortest duration of hospital stay and one of the lowest FIM improvements among the 4 clusters despite higher FIM scores at admission. In cluster C, also consisting of mostly ethnic minorities with multiple socioeconomic status vulnerabilities, patients were characterized by low cognitive FIM scores at admission and the longest duration of stay, and they showed good improvement in FIM scores.Conclusions
Application of clustering techniques to inpatient data identified distinct clusters of patients who may experience differences in their rehabilitation outcome due to their membership in various “at-risk” groups. The results identified patients (ie, cluster B, with minority patients; and cluster D, with elderly patients) who attain below-average gains in brain injury rehabilitation. The results also suggested that systemic (eg, duration of stay) or clinical service improvements (eg, staff's language skills, ability to offer substance abuse therapy, provide appropriate referrals, liaise with intensive social work services, or plan subacute rehabilitation phase) could be beneficial for acute settings. Stronger recruitment, training, and retention initiatives for bilingual and multiethnic professionals may also be considered to optimize gains from acute inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. 相似文献9.
Jan W. van der Scheer Michael J. Hutchinson Thomas Paulson Kathleen A. Martin Ginis Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey 《PM & R》2018,10(2):194-207
Objective
To systematically synthesize and appraise research regarding test-retest reliability or criterion validity of subjective measures for assessing aerobic exercise intensity in adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).Data Sources
Electronic databases (Pubmed, PsychINFO, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE, and CINAHL) were searched from inception to January 1, 2016.Study Selection
Studies involving at least 50% of participants with SCI who performed an aerobic exercise test that included measurement of subjective and objective intensity based on test-retest reliability or criterion validity protocols.Data Extraction
Characteristics were extracted on study design, measures, participants, protocols, and results. Each study was evaluated for risk of bias based on strength of the study design and a quality checklist score (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments [COSMIN]).Data Synthesis
The 7 eligible studies (1 for reliability, 6 for validity) evaluated overall, peripheral and/or central ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) on a scale of 6-20 (RPE 6-20). No eligible studies were identified for other subjective intensity measures. The evidence for reliability and validity were synthesized separately for each measure and were assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Overall, very low GRADE confidence ratings were established for reliability and validity evidence generalizable to the entire population with SCI and various upper-body and lower-body modalities. There was low confidence for the evidence showing that overall RPE 6-20 has acceptable validity for adults with SCI and high fitness levels performing moderate to vigorous-intensity upper-body aerobic exercise.Conclusions
Health care professionals and scientists need to be aware of the very low to low confidence in the evidence, which currently prohibits a strong clinical recommendation for the use of subjective measures for assessing aerobic exercise intensity in adults with SCI. However, a tentative, conditional recommendation regarding overall RPE 6-20 seems applicable, depending on participants’ fitness level as well as the exercise intensity and modality used.Level of Evidence
NA 相似文献10.
Soo Hoon Lee Daesung Lim Dong Hoon Kim Seong Chun Kim Tae Yun Kim Changwoo Kang Jin Hee Jeong Yong Joo Park Sang Bong Lee Rock Bum Kim 《The Journal of emergency medicine》2018,54(4):427-434
Background
Mortality prediction in patients with brain trauma during initial management in the emergency department (ED) is essential for creating the foundation for a better prognosis.Objective
This study aimed to create a simple and useful survival predictive model for patients with isolated blunt traumatic brain injury that is easily available in the ED.Methods
This is a retrospective study based on the trauma registry data of an academic teaching hospital. The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 15 years, blunt and not penetrating mechanism of injury, and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scores between 1 and 6 for head and 0 for all other body parts. The primary outcome was 30-day survival probability. Internal and external validation was performed.Results
After univariate logistic regression analysis based on the derivation cohort, the final Predictor of Isolated Trauma in Head (PITH) model for survival prediction of isolated traumatic brain injury included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), age, and coded AIS of the head. In the validation cohort, the area under the curve of the PITH score was 0.970 (p < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval 0.960–0.978). Sensitivity and specificity were 95% and 81.7% at the cutoff value of 0.9 (probability of survival 90%), respectively.Conclusions
The PITH model performed better than the GCS; Revised Trauma Score; and mechanism of injury, GCS, age, and arterial pressure. It will be a useful triage method for isolated traumatic brain injury in the early phase of management. 相似文献11.
12.
13.
Marsh Königs Eva A. Beurskens Lian Snoep Erik J. Scherder Jaap Oosterlaan 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(6):1149-1159.e1
Objective
To systematically review evidence on the effects of timing and intensity of neurorehabilitation on the functional recovery of patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and aggregate the available evidence using meta-analytic methods.Data Sources
PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Database.Study Selection
Electronic databases were searched for prospective controlled clinical trials assessing the effect of timing or intensity of multidisciplinary neurorehabilitation programs on functional outcome of patients with moderate or severe TBI. A total of 5961 unique records were screened for relevance, of which 58 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility by 2 independent authors. Eleven articles were included for systematic review and meta-analysis.Data Extraction
Two independent authors performed data extraction and risk of bias analysis using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Discrepancies between authors were resolved by consensus.Data Synthesis
Systematic review of a total of 6 randomized controlled trials, 1 quasi-randomized trial, and 4 controlled trials revealed consistent evidence for a beneficial effect of early onset neurorehabilitation in the trauma center and intensive neurorehabilitation in the rehabilitation facility on functional outcome compared with usual care. Meta-analytic quantification revealed a large-sized positive effect for early onset rehabilitation programs (d=1.02; P<.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56–1.47) and a medium-sized positive effect for intensive neurorehabilitation programs (d=.67; P<.001; 95% CI, .38–.97) compared with usual care. These effects were replicated based solely on studies with a low overall risk of bias.Conclusions
The available evidence indicates that early onset neurorehabilitation in the trauma center and more intensive neurorehabilitation in the rehabilitation facility promote functional recovery of patients with moderate to severe TBI compared with usual care. These findings support the integration of early onset and more intensive neurorehabilitation in the chain of care for patients with TBI. 相似文献14.
Cheng-Yang Hsieh Hsiu-Chen Huang Darren Philbert Wu Chung-Yi Li Meng-Jun Chiu Sheng-Feng Sung 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(6):1042-1048.e6
Objective
To determine the relation between rehabilitation intensity and poststroke mortality.Design
Retrospective cohort study.Setting
Nationwide claims data.Participants
From Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims databases, patients (N=6737; mean age, 66.9y; 40.3% women) hospitalized between 2001 and 2013 for a first-ever stroke who had mild to moderate stroke and survived the first 90 days of stroke were enrolled.Interventions
The intensity of rehabilitation therapy within 90 days after stroke was categorized into low, medium, or high based on the tertile distribution of the number of rehabilitation sessions.Main Outcome Measures
Long-term all-cause mortality. The Cox proportional hazard models with Bonferroni correction were used to assess the association between rehabilitation intensity and mortality, adjusting for age, comorbidities, stroke severity, and other covariates.Results
Patients in the high-intensity group were younger but had a higher burden of comorbidities and greater stroke severity. During follow-up, the high-intensity group was associated with a significantly lower adjusted risk (hazard ratio [HR], .73; 95% confidence interval [CI], .63–.84) of mortality than the low-intensity group, whereas the medium-intensity group carried a similar risk of mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84–1.06) compared with the low-intensity group. This association was not modified by stroke severity.Conclusions
Among patients with mild to moderate stroke severity, high-intensity rehabilitation therapy within the first 90 days was associated with a lower mortality risk than low-intensity therapy. Efforts to promote high-intensity rehabilitation therapy for this group of patients with stroke should be encouraged. 相似文献15.
Bridget Hill Gavin Williams John Olver Scott Ferris Andrea Bialocerkowski 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(4):629-634
Objective
To evaluate reproducibility (reliability and agreement) of the Brachial Assessment Tool (BrAT), a new patient-reported outcome measure for adults with traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI).Design
Prospective repeated-measure design.Setting
Outpatient clinics.Participants
Adults with confirmed traumatic BPI (N=43; age range, 19–82y).Interventions
People with BPI completed the 31-item 4-response BrAT twice, 2 weeks apart. Results for the 3 subscales and summed score were compared at time 1 and time 2 to determine reliability, including systematic differences using paired t tests, test retest using intraclass correlation coefficient model 1,1 (ICC1,1), and internal consistency using Cronbach α. Agreement parameters included standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, and limits of agreement.Main Outcome Measure
BrAT.Results
Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC1,1=.90–.97). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach α=.90–.98). Measurement error was relatively low (standard error of measurement range, 3.1–8.8). A change of >4 for subscale 1, >6 for subscale 2, >4 for subscale 3, and >10 for the summed score is indicative of change over and above measurement error. Limits of agreement ranged from ±4.4 (subscale 3) to 11.61 (summed score).Conclusions
These findings support the use of the BrAT as a reproducible patient-reported outcome measure for adults with traumatic BPI with evidence of appropriate reliability and agreement for both individual and group comparisons. Further psychometric testing is required to establish the construct validity and responsiveness of the BrAT. 相似文献16.
James F. Malec Timothy E. Stump Patrick O. Monahan Jacob Kean Dawn Neumann Flora M. Hammond 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(2):281-288.e2
Objectives
To develop, for versions completed by individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and an observer, a more precise metric for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Irritability and Aggression subscales using all behavioral item ratings for use with individuals with TBI and to address the dimensionality of the represented behavioral domains.Design
Rasch and confirmatory factor analyses of retrospective baseline NPI data from 3 treatment studies.Setting
Postacute rehabilitation clinic.Participants
NPI records (N = 525) consisting of observer ratings (n = 287) and self-ratings (n = 238) by participants with complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI at least 6 months postinjury.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
Frequency and severity ratings from NPI Irritability/Lability and Agitation/Aggression subscales.Results
Confirmatory factor analyses of both observer and participant ratings showed good fit for either a 1-factor or a 2-factor solution. Consistent with this, the Rasch model also fit the data well with aggression items indicating the more severe end of the construct and irritability items populating the milder end.Conclusions
Irritability and aggression appear to represent different levels of severity of a single construct. The derived Rasch metric offers a measure of this construct based on responses to all specific items that is appropriate for parametric statistical analysis and may be useful in research and clinical assessments of individuals with TBI. 相似文献17.
Bridget Hill Gavin Williams John Olver Scott Ferris Andrea Bialocerkowski 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(4):736-742
Objectives
To evaluate construct validity and responsiveness of the Brachial Assessment Tool (BrAT), a new patient-reported outcome measure for people with traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI), and to compare it to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI).Design
Cross-sectional study.Setting
Outpatient clinics.Participants
Adults (N=29; age range, 20–69y) with confirmed traumatic BPI.Interventions
Participants completed the BrAT 3 times over an 18-month period together with 16 DASH activity items and the UEFI. Evaluations were undertaken of construct validity, known-groups validity, 1-way repeated analysis of variance, and effect size.Main Outcome Measures
BrAT, DASH, and UEFI.Results
The BrAT demonstrated a moderate to low correlation with the DASH activity items (<0.7) and a large correlation with the UEFI (>0.7). According to known-groups validity, only the BrAT was able to discriminate between people who stated they could use their hand versus those who were unable to use their hand to perform activities. All measures indicated a significant effect for time with the exception of BrAT subscale 1. The effect size was highest for the BrAT but lower than expected (BrAT, .52–.40; DASH, .15; UEFI, .36).Conclusions
These preliminary findings support the BrAT as a valid and responsive patient-reported outcome measure for adults with traumatic BPI. The BrAT activity items appear to be more targeted than the DASH or UEFI particularly for people with more severe BPI. The BrAT also appears to be measuring a different activity construct than the DASH and the UEFI. Further work is required to confirm these results with larger sample sizes. 相似文献18.
Alexander J. Bajorek Chloe Slocum Richard Goldstein Jacqueline Mix Paulette Niewczyk Colleen M. Ryan Carla Tierney Hendricks Ross Zafonte Jeffrey C. Schneider 《PM & R》2017,9(1):1-7
Background
A significant proportion of burn injury patients are admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). There is increasing interest in the use of functional variables, such as cognition, in predicting IRF outcomes. Cognitive impairment is an important cause of disability in the burn injury population, yet its relationship to IRF outcomes has not been studied.Objective
To assess how cognitive function affects rehabilitation outcomes in the burn injury population.Design
Retrospective study.Setting
Inpatient rehabilitation facilities in the United States.Participants
A total of 5347 adults admitted to an IRF with burn injury between 2002 and 2011.Methods or Interventions
Multivariable regression was used to model rehabilitation outcome measures, using the cognitive domain of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument as the independent variable and controlling for demographic, medical, and facility covariates.Main Outcome Measurements
FIM total gain, readmission to an acute care setting at any time during inpatient rehabilitation, readmission to an acute care setting in the first 3 days of IRF admission, rate of discharge to the community setting, and length of stay efficiency.Results
Cognitive FIM total at admission was a significant predictor of FIM total gain, length of stay efficiency, and acute readmission at 3 days (P < .05). Cognitive FIM total scores did not have an impact on acute care readmission rate or discharge to the community setting.Conclusions
Cognitive status may be an important predictor of rehabilitation outcomes in the burn injury population. Future work is needed to further examine the impact of specific cognitive interventions on rehabilitation outcomes in this population.Level of Evidence
II 相似文献19.
Susan Magasi Alex Wong Ana Miskovic David Tulsky Allen W. Heinemann 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(1):1-8
Objective
To test the effect that indicators of mobility device quality have on participation outcomes in community-dwelling adults with spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and stroke by using structural equation modeling.Design
Survey, cross-sectional study, and model testing.Setting
Clinical research space at 2 academic medical centers and 1 free-standing rehabilitation hospital.Participants
Community-dwelling adults (N=250; mean age, 48±14.3y) with spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and stroke.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcomes Measures
The Mobility Device Impact Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Social Function (version 2.0) scale, including Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities, and the 2 Community Participation Indicators' enfranchisement scales. Details about device quality (reparability, reliability, ease of maintenance) and device type were also collected.Results
Respondents used ambulation aids (30%), manual (34%), and power wheelchairs (30%). Indicators of device quality had a moderating effect on participation outcomes, with 3 device quality variables (repairability, ease of maintenance, device reliability) accounting for 20% of the variance in participation. Wheelchair users reported lower participation enfranchisement than did ambulation aid users.Conclusions
Mobility device quality plays an important role in participation outcomes. It is critical that people have access to mobility devices and that these devices be reliable. 相似文献20.
Cameron J.B. Cunningham Heather C. Finlayson William R. Henderson Russell J. O’Connor Andrew Travlos 《PM & R》2018,10(5):494-500