The Response of Implanted Dual Chamber Pacemakers to 50 Hz Extraneous Electrical Interference

Twenty-two patients with dual chamber pacemakers with interchangeable lead configuration were exposed to 50 Hz electromagnetic interference. Current, al corporeal levels from 0–600 μA, was applied between electrodes on shoulders and feet using a bedside injection unit. Pacemaker behavior was monitored with telemetered event markers and intracardiac eJectrograms. In bipolar mode, noise reversion mode was induced in all except two Medtronic units at high (> 170 μA) levels of corporeal current, In the Inlermedics, Siemens Pacesetter, and Telectronics models, onset of noise reversion mode was preceded by a window of inappropriate function, characterized by rate acceleration due to atriai maisensing, or pacemaker inhibition due to ventricular nialsensiiig. In unipolar mode, pacemaker malfunction occurred at much lower current levels. Inappropriate behavior preceded the onset of protective noise reversion mode. During current injection, all pacemakers could be interrogated and reprogrammed, and intracardiac telemetry was reliably obtained except in two Medtronic units at high current levels. No pacemaker was reset by the electrical interference, and no cross-talk was seen. Use of bipolar mode confers a high decree of protection from extraneous electrical interference, but in unipolarmode pacemakers may be inhibited by small amounts of corporeal current, potentially encountered in every day life. The current injection anit allows safe, controllable, and quantifiable investigation of the effects of the electric field induced by a current on implanted pacemakers. Telemetry of annotated intracardiac signals during electromagnetic interference clarifies observations of pacemaker acceleration and inhibition.     

The effect of power frequency high intensity electric fields on implanted cardiac pacemakers

Thirty-five patients fitted with 16 different pacemaker models (from 6 manufacturers) were exposed to 50 Hz electric fields up to a maximum of 20 kV/m. Four different response patterns were encountered: (1) normal sensing and pacing in all Medtronic and some Vitatron units; (2) reversion to the fixed (interference) rate in all Telectronics, all Pacesetter, some Vitatron and CPI units; (3) slow and irregular pacing in one CPI and in all Cordis units; (4) mixed behavior over a critical range of field strengths in which slow and irregular pacing preceded reversion to fixed-rate, in some Telectronics and Pacesetter units. The field strengths required to induce such behavior varied from unit to unit and from model to model, with Telectronics being the most sensitive. In general, the interference threshold depended on the magnitude and distribution of induced body current relative to the pacemaker as well as field strength and thus varied with patient height, build and posture. While only a small proportion of pacemaker patients are likely to encounter electric fields strong enough to interfere with pacemaker behavior, this possible hazard should be recognized.     

Acute Effects of Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Arrhythmias on Implanted Permanent Pacing Systems

We studied the safety of performing RF catheter ablation in patients with implanted permanent pacemakers by monitoring the function of implanted pacing systems before, during, and immediately after exposure to RF energy. Patients with implanted pacing systems may require RF ablation for treatment of a variety of tachyarrhythmias. High frequency electromagnetic fields, such as RF energy, may affect implanted pacing systems, causing temporary or permanent loss of output, under- sensing, oversensing, asynchronous pacing, or reversion to “reset” (Recommended Replacement Time or Power On Reset) parameters. Thirty-five patients with implanted pacing systems (23 DDDR, 6 VVIR, 5 DDD, 1 VVI, 31 bipolar and 4 unipolar) underwent RF catheter ablation. Prior to ablation, each pacing system underwent measurements of pacing and sensing thresholds, telemetry of intracardiac electrograms and measurement of battery voltage and lead impedance(s). During ablation, pacemaker function was monitored by real-time telemetry, intracardiac electrograms, and surface ECG. Immediately after ablation, each pacing system was reevaluated. Telemetry during RF ablation revealed normal pacing and sensing in 14 (40%) of 35 patients. Refractory period extension with asynchronous pacing and noise mode reversion were seen in 16 (46%) of 35 patients. Rare under- and/or oversensing, reversion to reset parameters, and telemetry “lock up” with inhibition of pacing output was seen in a few patients. After ablation, there were no significant changes in atrial or ventricular pacing or sensing thresholds or measurements of atrial and ventricular lead impedances. We conclude that most permanent pacemakers are not adversely affected by exposure to RF energy during catheter ablation. A variety of pacemaker behaviors may be seen during RF ablation, and a thorough understanding of each pulse generator's potential response(s) to electromagnetic interference is important before undertaking catheter ablation in patients with permanent pacemakers. Careful revaluation of the patient's pacing system following the procedure is mandatory.     

The Effect of Power Frequency High Intensity Electric Fields on Implanted Cardiac Pacemakers

Thirty-five patients fitted with 16 different pacemaker models (from 6 manufacturers) were exposed to 50 Hz electric fields up to a maximum of 20 kV/m. Four different response patterns were encountered: (1) normal sensing and pacing in all Medtronic and some Vitatron units; (2) reversion to the fixed (interference) rale in ail Telectronics. all Pacesetter, some Vitatron and CPI units; (3) slowand irregtilarpacing in one CPI and in all Cordis units; (4) mixed behaviorovera critical range of field strengths in which slow and irregular pacing preceded reversion to fixed-rate, in some Telectromics and Pacesetter units. The field strengths required to induce such behavior varied from unit to unit and from model to model, with Telectronics being the most sensitive. In general, the interference threshold depended on the magnitude and distribution of induced body current relative to the pacemaker as well as field strength and thus varied with patient height, build and posture. While only a small proportion of pacemaker patients are likely lo encounter electric fields strong enough to interim.¹ with pacemaker behavior, this possible hazard should be recognized.     

Safety of pacemaker implantation prior to radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular junction in a single session procedure

RF current delivery may cause acute and chronic dysfunction of previously implanted pacemakers. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the effects of RF energy on Thera I and Kappa pacemakers in 70 consecutive patients (mean age 70 ± 11 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 48 ± 15%) who underwent RF ablation of the AV junction for antiarrhythmic drug refractory atrial fibrillation (permanent in 42 patients, paroxysmal in 28). These pacing systems incorporate protection elements to avoid electromagnetic interference. The pacemakers (Thera DR 7960 I in 20 patients, Thera SR 8960 1 in 30, Kappa DR 600–601 in 8, Kappa SR 700–701 in 12) were implanted prior to RF ablation in a single session procedure and were transiently programmed to VVI mode at a rate of 30 beats/min. Capsure SP and Z unibipolar leads were used. During RF application there was continuous monitoring of three ECG leads, endocavitary electrograms, and event markers. Complete AV block was achieved in all cases after 3.6 ± 2.9 RF pulses and 100 ± 75 seconds of RF energy delivery. The mean time of pacemaker implantation and RF ablation was 60 ± 20 minutes. Transient or permanent pacemaker dysfunction including under/oversensing, reversion to a "noise-mode" pacing, pacing inhibition, reprogramming, or recycling were not observed. Leads impedance, sensing, and pacing thresholds remained in the normal range in the acute and long-term phase (average follow-up 18 ± 12 months). In conclusion, Thera I and Kappa pacemakers exhibit excellent protection against interference produced by RF current. The functional integrity of the pacemakers and Capsure leads was observed in the acute and chronic phases. Thus, the implantation of these pacing systems prior to RF ablation of the AV junction can be recommended.     

Safety of a combined strength and endurance training using neuromuscular electrical stimulation of thighs muscles in patients with heart failure and bipolar sensing cardiac pacemakers

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an effective and non-strenuous therapy to enhance the strength and endurance capacity of the skeletal muscles in patients with severe chronic heart failure. NMES in patients with pacemakers is controversial because potential electromagnetic interference may result in pacemaker malfunction. Therefore, such patients are in general excluded from NMES. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the safety of a combined NMES protocol to increase strength and endurance capacity of the skeletal muscles in patients with heart failure and implanted pacemakers. Seven patients with chronic heart failure and implanted cardiac pacemakers with bipolar sensing leads received NMES treatment of thigh muscles, using a combined protocol comprising biphasic, symmetric, rectangular constant current impulses at different frequencies (8-50 Hz), pulse width up to 60 s (8 Hz), 4 s (15 Hz), 4 s (30 Hz), and 6 s (50 Hz), and amplitudes up to +/- 100 mA (all frequencies) applied to both knee extensor and flexor muscles via surface electrodes (8 x 13 cm each). Acute electromagnetic interference during a safety procedure (telemetric monitoring) before therapeutic NMES application was not observed in any of the patients. The 7 patients received during 20 therapeutic NMES sessions a total of 23,380 on-phases, comprising 2194.08 x 10(3) biphasic electrical pulses, without adverse events. Heart rate monitoring during stimulation and pacemaker interrogation revealed no abnormalities. NMES treatment of thigh muscles using a combined NMES protocol to enhance strength and endurance capacity appears to be safe in patients with heart failure and implanted pacemakers with bipolar sensing, as far as the described electrode configuration and parameter range is applied.     

Importance of Pacemaker Noise Reversion as a Potential Mechanism of Pacemaker-ICD Interactions

Numerous types of interactions between pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been described. Pacemaker outputs preventing appropriate detection of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation by the ICD is one of the more serious. Asynchronous pacemaker activity during ventricular arrhythmias maybe caused by either nonsensing of the arrhythmia or by noise reversion, which is an algorithm that causes the pacemaker to switch to asynchronous pacing when repetitive sensing at a high rate occurs. We analyzed the mechanisms underlying asynchronous pacemaker activity in ventricular arrhythmias using pacemaker telemetry during the arrhythmia. Thirty-nine induced arrhythmias from 26 different procedures in 19 patients with both pacemakers and ICDs were analyzed. Of the 39 arrhythmias, asynchronous pacemaker activity occurred in 16. The underlying mechanism was nonsensing in 4 episodes and noise reversion in 12 episodes. Clinically significant interference with detection arose on three occasions. Conditions favoring the occurrence of noise reversion include specific pacemaker models, arrhythmia cycle lengths in the range causing noise reversion of the individual pacemaker model, long noise sampling periods, and VVI pacing mode. Noise reversion can be diagnosed by telemetering the pacemaker marker channel during ventricular arrhvthmias as a part of routine pacemaker-ICD interaction evaluation. It can be prevented or minimized by programming short ventricular refractory periods or using pacemakers with shoii retriggerable refractory periods.     

Noise Reversion of a Dual Chamber Pacemaker without Noise

Three patients are reported whose DDD pacemakers reverted to the asynchronous mode in the absence of skeletal muscle or electromagnetic (EMI) interference. In all three cases, the basic cardiac rhythm was atrial fibrillation with fast ventricular response due to intrinsic AV conduction. Noise reversion was triggered by the patients' own ventricular activity at cycle lengths shorter than the ventricular refractory period of the pulse generator. In one patient, asynchronous AV sequential pacing during atrial fibrillation was noted shortly after resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation; however, the initiation of the malignant ventricular arrhythmia by the pacemaker remains unproven. The mechanism of noise reversion by rapid cardiac activity and possible solutions to the problem by adequate pacemaker design are discussed.     

The Effect of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation on Permanent Pacemakers: An Experimental Study

Radiofrequency current is being investigated as an alternative to direct current shock for transcatheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Permanent pacemakers are known to be susceptible to high frequency electromagnetic interference. This study was performed to examine the effects of transcatheter radiofrequency ablation on permanent pacemakers in a worst-case scenario. Nineteen pulse generators representing 16 models from seven manufacturers were acutely implanted in 12 dogs to assess their function during and after ablation. Pulse generators were implanted subcutaneously in the neck and connected to a transvenous permanent pacing lead positioned in the right ventricular apex. A 6F quadripolar electrode catheter was positioned approximately 1 cm from the tip of the permanent pacing lead. Radiofrequency current from an electrosurgical unit was applied between the distal electrode of the catheter and a large diameter skin electrode placed below the left scapula. Three additional ablation sessions were performed with the catheter situated 4-5 cm from the permanent pacing lead. Each ablation consisted of 15 W of radiofrequency power, delivered for up to 30 seconds. Twelve pulse generators were falsely inhibited during radiofrequency ablation while programmed to the VVI or DDD mode, nine of which continued to be inhibited while programmed to the VOO or DOO mode. Five pulse generators paced at abnormal rates, including three examples of one pulse generator model that displayed pacemaker runaway. Runaway was observed during eight ablations, resulting in two episodes of ventricular fibrillation. Eleven pulse generators reverted to noise mode behavior during ablation. Only three pulse generators were unaffected during ablation. No reprogramming or pacing system malfunctions were observed after cessation of radiofrequency current application or during ablations greater than 4 cm from the permanent lead.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

How to test mode switching in pacemakers implanted in patients: the MOST study

Optimal management of atrial arrhythmias with dual chamber pacemakers requires proper performance of automatic mode switching (AMS). The aim of this study was to develop a reliable technique to test the AMS function by using an external electronic device capable of mimicking the occurrence of supraventricular arrhythmias (Supraventricular Arrhythmia Simulator [SAS]). The SAS delivers low voltage pulse trains (200 mV, 20 ms) through two skin electrodes. Each pulse train lasts 15 seconds and starts synchronously with a pacing pulse of the implanted pacemaker to avoid interference from the operator. The pulse train rate is set at 350, 250, and 160 beats/min to simulate AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia (AT), respectively. Thirty-five patients implanted with Vitatron pacemakers, whose AMS system has been previously validated, were enrolled. Atrial and ventricular sensing were programmed in unipolar mode at 0.5 mV and in bipolar mode at > 2 mV, respectively. All pulses from the SAS were detected by the atrial channel at an amplitude ranging from 1 to 3 mV. The test proved to be safe and reliable at rest and during exercise. AMS occurred immediately at onset or at offset of atrial arrhythmias, and no adverse interference on pacemaker function was seen from the SAS. In conclusion, the described technique and the SAS are safe and reliable for patient and pacemaker function and can be proposed as a useful method to verify proper performance of AMS function irrespective of the type of implanted devices.     

Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on Cardiac Pacemakers and its Safety in Patients with Implanted Cardiac Pacemakers

Ejects of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) were studied on 15 pacemakers (standard single chamber n = 5, dual chamber n = 6, rate responsive single chamber [Activitrax] n = 4). In-vitro testing involved suspending the pacemakers in a bath of degassified, deionized water firmly taped to a platform at the point of maximal pressure, i.e., second focal point (F2), where they received pressure shocks (x?= 1300) from the HM3 Dornier lithotriptor. The pacemakers, programmed to their most sensitive setting, were continuously pacing at nominal outputs (atria) and ventricular pacing in the DDD mode). All units were assessed by a pacing system analyzer before and after the study, then underwent destructive analysis. During standard single chamber pacing (VVI) the pacing stimulus triggered ESWL. For dual chamber devices, ESWL was triggered by the atrial paced event which induced inhibition of the ventricular output in two pacemaker. This was eliminated by reprogramming to a less sensitive setting. The pacemaker can, hermetic seal and internal circuitry were undamaged in all units. Two rate responsive single chamber pacemakers had their activity sensing piezoelectric elements shattered when placed at F2. Two other units placed 5 cm from F2 were stimulated to their maximum upper programmed pacing rate with ESWL therapy, but were otherwise unaffected. Subsequent to this study, six patients with pacemakers programmed to the VVI (five), DDD (one) modes implanted in the thorax underwent successful ESWL without pacemaker or arrhythmic event. Conclusions: (A) It is generally safe for patients implanted with standard single chamber devices in a ventricular application to undergo ESWL without modifying the pacing/sensing parameters. (B) Patients implanted with dual chamber devices who pace in the atrium should be reprogrammed to the VVI mode during ESWL. (C) Patients with piezoelectric activity sensing rate responsive single chamber pacemakers should have this feature programmed off during ESWL and, if implanted in the abdomen, probably should not undergo ESWL.     

Apparent Pacemaker Failure due to Reversion Circuitry within the Programming Device

While being evaluated for a recurrent tachyarrhythmia, a patient with a permanent pacemaker underwent reprogramming of the unit from the DVI to the VVI mode for assessment of the underlying rhythm. Subsequent reprogramming of the pacemaker to the DVI or DDD mode was impossible despite multiple attempts and the use of multiple programmers. The problem was considered to be a malfunction of the pacemaker circuitry, and plans were made for the pacemaker to be explanted and a replacement unit implanted. Before the procedure, the pacemaker company was notified of the explantation. We subsequently learned that a special programming sequence had to be carried out because of reversion circuitry present in the pacemaker but not described in the available literature. This report emphasizes the need for familiarity with each of the individual pacemakers being implanted and the need for the manufacturer to be as specific as possible given the complexity of current units.     

A Comparison of External Rate Responsive Pacemakers With Identical Implanted Units

Seven patients with previously implanted accelerometer-based DDDR pacemakers had an identically programmed external pacemaker taped onto their chest. Both units underwent a simultaneous test to set the sensitivity of the accelerometer. The units were then programmed to record the pacing rates for a 15-minute period. The patients underwent an exercise course that included walking and stairs. After the exercise, the patients sat for 3 minutes and the pacing rates from the test were telemetered. The pacing rate was compared at 2 minutes, 4 minutes, peak, and 3 minutes postexercise. The mean standard deviation (SED) for the external pacemaker was 97.9 at 3.53 ppm, 102 at 10.6 ppm, 106 at 8.94 ppm, and 71.3 at 2.29 ppm at 2, 4, peak, and decay, respectively. The mean SEDfor the implanted pacemaker was 98.1 at 5.76 ppm, 100 at 10.2 ppm, 104 8.24 ppm, 72.4 at 2.88 ppm at 2, 4, peak, and decay, respectively. Difference between pacemakers in ppm was 0.286, 2.0, 2.71, and 1.14 at 2, 4, peak, and decay, respectively. A 95% confidence interval in ppm was - 5.28 to 5.85, - 10.1 to 14.1, - 7.30 to 12.7, and - 1.89 to 4.17 at 2, 4, peak, and decay, respectively. In all patients there was a high confidence correlation between the implanted and external unit. An external unit can be used to predict the rate response of an accelerometer-based pacemaker without any adjustments to the pacing parameters.     

Noise Mode Response at Peak Exercise in a DDD Pacemaker

The noise sampling period has been recognized as a cause of apparent sensing malfunction in demand pacemakers. Physiologic signals as well as external electromagnetic interference can cause certain demand pacemakers to remain refractory and escape asynchronously at a specified rate. In this case, noise mode reversion pacing at the programmed lower rate limit of a Cordis 415A DDD pacemaker was observed during exercise when P-waves fell within the noise sampling period.     

Inappropriate Rate Change in Minute Ventilation Rate Responsive Pacemakers Due to Interference by Cardiac Monitors

Observations of inappropriate rate increase in five patients with minute ventilation rate responsive implanted pacemakers (Telectronics Meta) are reported. Pacing rate increases were observed immediately upon connection of the resting patients to two brands of widely used cardiac monitors, and one commonly used echocardiograph. In some circumstances, the rate increase remained until monitor disconnection; in others the rate increase was transient, lasting about 20 seconds. A hardware thoracic resistance variation simulator was constructed and connected to one of the pacemakers to test sensitivity to rate modifying interference from external sources. This demonstrated that the sensitivity to interference is dependent upon the frequency of the interfering signal and is highest in the range 10–60 kHz. that peak currents as low as 10 μA can cause maximum rate increase, and that the signals injected into patients by several cardiac monitors, for purposes of lead-off detection or respiratory monitoring, fall into the frequency range at which the pacemaker is most susceptible to interference.     

Pacemaker Function During Radiofrequency Ablation

There are increasing numbers of radiofrequency current ablation procedures being reported. Selected patients have antitachycardia or antibradycardia pacemakers. The pacemaker behavior during and after ablation procedures differs widely. We report on the pacemaker reaction of 25 patients with 13 different devices, most with unipolar electrodes. Sensing failures were observed in 8 (32.0%) and pacing failures in 4 (16.0%) patients. Prolonged pauses and induction of tachyarrhythmias were observed. No pacemaker damage was seen although it is reported by other investigators. We recommend deactivation of implanted generators and an external bipolar pacing electrode. Manufacturers should focus their attention on this problem and protect the generators and their functions for 500 kHz radiofrequency current.     

Study of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Triggering by Electronic Article Surveillance Devices (SPICED TEAS)

The magnetic fields emitted by electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems (shoplifting gates) are a source of interference for implanted medical devices. In the Study of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Triggering by Electronic Article Surveillance Devices (SPICED TEAS), 25 adult volunteers with ICDs and 50 with pacemakers were exposed to the fields of six different EAS systems. These EAS systems used three modes of operation: magnetic audio frequency, swept radio frequency, and acoustomagnetic technology. No ICD exhibited interference mimicking sensing of tachyarrhythmias with any EAS system. Pacemakers interacted variably, depending on the type of EAS system. Swept radiofrequency systems produced no interaction with any implanted medical device. One magnetic audio frequency system interacted with 2 of 50 pacemakers. The acoustomagnetic system interacted with 48 of 50 pacemakers. Interactions included asynchronous pacing, atrial oversensing (producing "EAS induced tachycardia" in the ventricle), ventricular oversensing (with pacemaker inhibition), and paced beats resulting from the direct induction of current in the pacemaker ("EAS induced pacing"). These interactions produced symptoms in some patients ( palpitations, presyncopel only while patients were in the EAS field. No pacemaker was reprogrammed. We conclude that high energy, pulsed low frequency EAS systems such as acoustomagnetic systems interfere with most pacemakers. Pacemaker patients should be advised to minimize exposure to the fields of such systems to prevent the possibility of serious clinical events.     

Permanent programmable pacemakers in the management of recurrent tachycardias.

Patient reports are presented to indicate the application of standard implanted programmable pacemakers with endocardial electrodes for long-term overdrive suppression of recurrent ventricular tachycardia, and their adaptability to non-invasively induced burts of rapid ventricular pacing to cardiovert that arrhythmia. In carefully preselected patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome, this type of programmable pacemaker may also be used to convert paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia by short bursts of rapid ventricular pacing. In addition, the advantage of non-invasively instituting overdrive suppression with programmable pacemakers to control recurrent ventricular tachycardia appearing in patients being chronically paced for complete heart block is illustrated.     

Electromagnetic Interference of External Pacemakers by Walkie-Talkies and Digital Cellular Phones: Experimental Study

A number of experimental and clinical studies have documented the risk potential of interference with implanted pacemakers by various types of cellular phones. Radiofrequency susceptibility of external medical equipment has also been reported in experimental studies. The purpose of this experimental study was to evaluate electromagnetic interference of external pacemakers by walkie-talkies and digital cellular telephones. External bipolar pacing was monitored using a digital oscilloscope to record pacemaker pulses and electromagnetic interference separately. Tests with the walkie-talkie, Private Mobile Radio (PMR) (160 MHz, 2.5 W) were conducted during the calling phase. Tests with the cellular phones, global system for mobile communications (GSM) (900 MHz, 2 W) and Digital Cellular System (DCS) (1,800 MHz, 1 W) were conducted in the test mode. Nine widely used external pacemakers from four manufacturers were tested. Various disturbances including pacing inhibition and asynchronous pacing were observed in eight pacemakers by the PMR, in four by the GSM phone, and in two by the DCS phone. The maximum distance that interference persisted ranged from 10–200 cm. This experimental study shows a potential risk of interference of external pacemakers by walkie-talkies and cellular digital phones. Appropriate warnings should be issued against the potentially serious risks of using communication devices in the vicinity of acutely ill patients treated with temporary transvenous cardiac pacemakers.     

Do European GSM Mobile Cellular Phones Pose a Potential Risk to Pacemaker Patients?

BARBARO, V., et al .: Do European GSM Mobile Cellular Phones Pose a Potential Risk to Pacemaker Patients? A series of in vivo trials were carried out in order to verify whether the electromagnetic field radiated by GSM (Groupe Systemes Mobiles) mobile cellular phones might affect implanted pacemakers. Two European GSM phones of 2-watt power were tested and trials conducted on 101 pacemaker implanted outpatients attending day hospital for routine check-up, who volunteered for trials. Forty-three pacemaker models from 11 manufacturers were tested in all. When the sensing threshold of the pacemakers was set at a minimum and the antenna of the phone was in direct contact with the patient's chest, interference was detected for 26 implanted pacemakers. Specifically, pulse inhibition in 10 of 101 cases, ventricular triggering in 9 of 46 DDD-VDD pacemakers, and asynchronous pacing in 4 of 52 devices. Pulse inhibition was also observed combined with asynchronous pacing in 1 of 52 cases and with ventricular triggering in 2 of 46 cases. Minimum effect duration was ca. 3 seconds but in 6 cases effects continued as long as the interfering GSM signal was on. No permanent malfunctioning or changes in the programmed parameters were detected. Whenever interference was detected, trials were repeated to determine the maximum sensing threshold at which interference persisted (with the antenna in contact with the skin over the pacemaker). Then maximum distance between antenna and pacemaker at which interference occurred was determined at pacemaker maximum and minimum sensing threshold. Under our experimental conditions electromagnetic interference effects were detected at a maximum distance of 10 cm with the pacemaker programmed at its minimum sensing threshold. When the phone antenna was in direct contact with patient's skin over the implant, electromagnetic interference effects occurred at maximum ventricular and atrial sensing thresholds of 4 mV and 2.5 mV, respectively.