Safety and immunogenicity of New Zealand strain meningococcal serogroup B OMV vaccine in healthy adults: beginning of epidemic control

As the first step towards control of a strain specific epidemic of meningococcal disease in New Zealand (NZ), this study, an observer-blind, randomised controlled trial in 75 healthy adults, evaluated safety and immunogenicity of two different dosages of a meningococcal group B vaccine administered in a three dose regime. The "tailor-made" outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccine (candidate vaccine) developed using a New Zealand meningococcal group B strain (B:4:P1.7b,4) was well tolerated with no vaccine related serious adverse events. Similar local and systemic reactions were observed in those receiving the New Zealand candidate vaccine and the control parent Norwegian vaccine (MenBvac). A four-fold rise in serum bactericidal antibodies (SBAb) against the vaccine strain 4-6 weeks after the third vaccination was achieved in 100% of New Zealand candidate vaccine 2,519 microg participants and in 87% of 50 microg participants. The safety and immunogenicity profile observed in this study of healthy adults enabled studies in children to be initiated using 25 microg dosage.     

Evolution of immune response against Neisseria meningitidis B:14:P1.7,16 before and after the outer membrane vesicle vaccine MenBvac

A meningococcal B:14:P1.7,16 outbreak in Normandy (France) was recently controlled using MenBvac, an outer membrane vesicle vaccine previously designed against the B:15:P1.7,16 strain. The further emergence of a new B:14:P1.7,16 outbreak in another district in Normandy led us to explore immunity against B:14:P1.7,16 before and after the MenBvac campaign using a 2+1 (day 0, week 6, month 8) schedule. Children (1-5 years) were sampled before, during and up to one year after vaccination. Serum bactericidal activity against B:14:P1.7,16 was titrated using human complement (hSBA) and immune response was defined by hSBA titer ≥4 as a surrogate for protection. The percentage of hSBA titer ≥4 was 10.8% before vaccination, raised to 84.1% 6 weeks after the completion of the schedule, but declined to 39.7% one year later. This level is lower than the targeted 60% level and suggests only short-term persistence of response against B:14:P1.7,16 using this schedule.     

Booster vaccination with hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine in the second year of life is as safe as concomitant DTPa-IPV/Hib + HBV administered separately

The safety and reactogenicity of a booster dose of GSK Biologicals' hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine (N=4725) was compared with the separate administration of GSK Biologicals' DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines (N=4474) in two open, randomized multicenter studies (A and B). Solicited symptoms occurring within 4 days of vaccination were recorded on diary cards and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected throughout the study period. In Study A (N=1149), incidences of solicited symptoms were similar in both groups; there were no SAEs either reported within 4 days of vaccination or considered to be causally related to vaccination. In study B (N=8050), where fever was the only solicited symptom, rectal temperature > or =39.5 degrees C was observed in 2.5% and 2.8% of the subjects, respectively. Fever > or =40.0 degrees C was rare (0.6%), and only two cases of febrile convulsions were recorded during the 4 days following vaccination both in the control group. Large swelling reactions (defined as local injection site swelling with diameter >50 mm, noticeable diffuse injection site swelling or noticeable increased circumference of the injected limb) were reported following 2.3% of the booster vaccine doses, regardless of the vaccine used. Extensive swelling reactions involving an adjacent joint were reported in 0.1% of the subjects. Two SAEs, both reported after booster doses of DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines administered separately, were considered by the investigators to be related to vaccination. Both resolved completely without sequelae. The hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine and the DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines administered separately have similar good reactogenicity and safety profiles when given as booster doses in the second year of life.     

A short report on the highlights of world-wide development of RIX4414: a North American experience comparative evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of two dosages of an oral live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine (RIX4414) in infants in the United States and Canada

This randomized, double-blind trial conducted in the US and Canada was conducted to compare the safety and immunogenicity of two dosages of live attenuated oral monovalent G1 human rotavirus (HRV) vaccine administered orally at a 2-month interval concomitantly with routine childhood vaccines to healthy infants 5-15 weeks of age. No SAEs considered related to vaccine were reported. The incidence of solicited symptoms was similar among treatment groups during the 15-day post-vaccination surveillance periods. No significant difference in vaccine take after 2 doses (88.0% in high dose group and 81.5% in low dose group) was seen between vaccine groups. Two doses of either dosage level of HRV vaccine administered concurrently with routine childhood vaccines to healthy infants were well tolerated and elicited excellent vaccine takes.     

Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational vaccine containing two common pneumococcal proteins in toddlers: A phase II randomized clinical trial

Background

To provide broader protection against pneumococcal disease, new vaccines containing conserved Streptococcus pneumoniae proteins are being developed. This study assessed the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of four formulations containing pneumococcal proteins pneumolysin toxoid (dPly) and histidine triad protein (PhtD) in toddlers.

Methods

In this phase II, multicenter, observer-blind study (www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00985751) conducted in the Czech Republic, toddlers (12–23 months) were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to receive one of four investigational vaccine formulations (10 or 30 μg each of dPly and PhtD, alone or in combination with polysaccharide conjugates from the pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein-D conjugate vaccine [PHiD-CV]), or the licensed PHiD-CV, in a 2-dose primary series plus booster at study months 0, 2 and 6. Solicited local and general symptoms were recorded within seven days post-vaccination, unsolicited symptoms within 31 days post-vaccination, and serious adverse events (SAEs) during the entire study period. Antibody concentrations against the vaccine components were measured pre-vaccination, one month post-dose 2, pre- and one month post-booster.

Results

257 toddlers were enrolled and vaccinated. Percentages of solicited local and general symptoms following the different investigational formulations were generally within the same ranges as for PHiD-CV. After each dose, grade 3 fever (>40.0 °C, rectal measurement) was reported for maximum one toddler in each group with no differences between investigational formulations and PHiD-CV during primary vaccination. 23 SAEs were reported for 17 toddlers, with distribution balanced between all groups except the group receiving 30 μg dPly/PhtD with PHiD-CV-conjugates (no SAEs reported). None of the SAEs were considered to be vaccine-related.For all pneumococcal protein-containing formulations, anti-PhtD and anti-Ply antibody geometric mean concentrations increased from pre-vaccination to post-dose 2 and from pre- to post-booster vaccination.

Conclusion

All investigational vaccine formulations were well-tolerated and immunogenic when administered to toddlers as a 2-dose primary vaccination followed by a booster dose.     

Post-authorization safety surveillance of a liquid pentavalent vaccine in Guatemalan children

Objective

Combination vaccines have improved the efficiency of delivery of new vaccines in low and middle-income countries. Post-authorization monitoring of adverse events (AEs) after vaccination with a liquid pentavalent DTwP-HepB-Hib combination vaccine was conducted in Guatemalan infants.

Methods

A prospective observational safety study of the incidence of medical attended events (MAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) in children who received pentavalent and oral polio vaccines at 2, 4 and 6 months of age was conducted in two clinics at the Institute of Guatemala. Parents were contacted by telephone after each dose. All outpatient, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were monitored. A self-controlled analysis was conducted to determine if there was evidence of increased risk of MAEs or SAEs following vaccines as compared to control time windows.

Results

Of 3000 recruited infants, 2812 (93.7%) completed the third dose and 2805 (93.5%) completed follow-up. Ten AEs in eight infants, of which four SAEs in four infants, were classified as related to the vaccine. Thirteen deaths were reported due to common illnesses of infancy, and none were judged to be related to the vaccine. The mortality rate (4.4 per 1000) was lower than expected for the population. The incidence-rate-ratio for healthcare visits was lower in post-vaccination time windows than for control windows; after the first vaccine dose, the rate ratios for the risk periods of 0–1, 2–6, and 7–30 days post-vaccination were 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7, respectively (all statistically significantly different from the reference value of 1.0 for the 31–60 day control period).

Conclusion

The liquid pentavalent vaccine was associated with lower rates of health care visits and not associated with increases in SAEs or hospitalizations. Systems can be set up in low to middle income countries to capture all health care visits to monitor the safety of new vaccines.     

Safety and immunogenicity of seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in pregnant women

BackgroundIn the United States, seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is recommended for pregnant women; however, in early 2009, immunization rates were low, partly due to limited prospective data and concerns about vaccine safety.ObjectiveWe conducted a randomized study of two licensed seasonal trivalent IIVs (IIV3) to assess their safety and immunogenicity in pregnant women.Study DesignIn this prospective, randomized clinical study, 100 pregnant women, 18–39 years of age and ≥14 weeks gestation received a single intramuscular dose of 2008–2009 Fluzone® or Fluarix®. Injection site and systemic reactions were recorded for 7 days after vaccination and serious adverse events (SAEs) and pregnancy outcomes were documented. Serum samples collected before and 28 days after vaccination were tested for hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody levels.ResultsThe majority of the injection site and systemic reactions were mild and self-limited after both vaccines. No fever ≥100 °F was reported. There were no vaccine-associated SAEs. Immune responses to influenza vaccine antigens were similar for the two study vaccines, with robust HAI responses against influenza A strains, and relatively lower responses for influenza B strains.ConclusionSeasonal inactivated influenza vaccines were well tolerated and immunogenic in pregnant women.

• ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00905125.

Synopsis: In this prospective clinical trial, we demonstrated that immunization with seasonal trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine in the second and third trimester of pregnancy is immunogenic and safe.     

Improved immunogenicity of high-dose influenza vaccine compared to standard-dose influenza vaccine in adult oncology patients younger than 65 years receiving chemotherapy: A pilot randomized clinical trial

PurposePatients undergoing chemotherapy often fail to develop robust responses to influenza vaccination. Compared to standard-dose influenza vaccine (SD), high-dose influenza vaccine (HD) has shown improved immunogenicity and protection against influenza illness in adults 65 years and older. This study compared the immunogenicity and tolerability of HD to SD in adults younger than 65 years of age receiving chemotherapy.MethodsThis double-blind study randomized patients receiving chemotherapy to vaccination with either SD or HD influenza vaccine. Hemagglutination inhibition assays (HAI) were performed prior to and 4 weeks after vaccination. HAI were summarized as geometric mean titers (GMT), seroconversion rates, and seroprotection rates.ResultsA total of 105 subjects were enrolled in the trial (51 received SD and 54 received HD). Subjects were well matched for demographic and medical conditions. Both vaccines were well tolerated with no SAEs. Of the 100 subjects with evaluable data, seroconversion rates for all 3 influenza antigens & post-vaccination GMTs for H3N2 & B strains were significantly improved with HD compared to SD. Seroprotection was excellent and equivalent in both groups.ConclusionsTrivalent high-dose influenza vaccine can be safely administered to patients receiving chemotherapy with improved immunogenicity and seroconversion compared to standard-dose vaccine. Post-vaccination seroprotection rates were similar in both groups. A larger study is needed to show clinical benefits with HD in this population.This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01666782.     

MeNZB: a safe and highly immunogenic tailor-made vaccine against the New Zealand Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B disease epidemic strain

Clinical studies have been conducted in New Zealand evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of an outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccine, MeNZB, developed to control epidemic disease caused by group B meningococci, subtype P1.7b,4. MeNZB, administered in a three-dose regimen, was well tolerated and induced a seroresponse, defined as a four-fold rise (> or =titre 8) in serum bactericidal antibodies against the vaccine strain 4-6 weeks after the third vaccination, in 96% (95% confidence interval (CI): 79-100%) of adults, 76% (95% CI: 72-80%) of children, 75% (95% CI: 69-80%) of toddlers and 74% (95% CI: 67-80%) of infants receiving MeNZB. In conclusion, these findings suggest that MeNZB is safe and is likely to confer protection against systemic group B meningococcal disease caused by the epidemic strain.     

An evaluation of the adverse reaction potential of three measles-mumps-rubella combination vaccines.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of adverse events following the administration of three commercially available measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) combination vaccines. METHODS: A randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed in 1996 that involved a total of 10 142 students 6-12 years of age in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, in Brazil. An MMR vaccine containing the Edmonston-Zagreb, Leningrad-Zagreb, and RA 27/3 strains ("vaccine A") was administered to 2 226 students (21.9% of the total); an MMR vaccine with the Moraten, Jeryl Lynn, and Wistar 27/3 strains ("vaccine B") was administered to 2 216 children (21.8%); and an MMR vaccine containing the Schwartz, Urabe AM-9, and Wistar 27/3 strains ("vaccine C") was given to 2 179 students (21.5%). A control group of 3 521 students (34.7%) was not vaccinated. Both the vaccinated subjects and the control subjects were followed daily for 30 days to detect any clinical manifestations. RESULTS: Adverse events were more frequent in the vaccinated children than in the control group (P < 0.01). In terms of causing parotitis, vaccine A had a relative risk (RR) of 5.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.11-10.54) when compared with vaccine B, and an RR of 2.33 (95% CI = 1.52-3.58) when compared with vaccine C. Vaccine A was also associated with an increased risk of lymphadenopathy when compared with vaccine B (RR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.78-5.45) and with vaccine C (RR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.35-3.66). Vaccine C was associated with an increased risk of parotitis when compared with vaccine B (RR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.26-4.80). Three cases of aseptic meningitis were detected among the children in the study group, but only one case of vaccine-related aseptic meningitis was identified, among the children receiving vaccine A. CONCLUSIONS: The three MMR vaccines that we studied are associated with different risks of adverse events. We found vaccine A to cause more reactions than the two other vaccines, especially vaccine B. In addition, vaccine A presented both a temporal and a cause-and-effect association with one case of aseptic meningitis. We hope that this study will contribute information that can be used in choosing MMR vaccines with safe and effective strains, especially for mass vaccination strategies.     

Vaccination against Hong Kong influenza in Britain, 1968-9: A report to the Medical Research Council Committee on Influenza and other Respiratory Virus Vaccines*

Studies of the effect of Hong Kong (HK) influenza vaccine were made in adults and children in Great Britain during 1968 and 1969. The vaccines were administered intramuscularly and also by intranasal spray. The serum antibody response was studied in 284 subjects. Most developed rising titres to vaccine given intramuscularly and few to vaccine given intranasally. Deoxycholate-split vaccine was as potent as conventional whole virus vaccine. Antibody titres were maintained for months. Over 4000 subjects in factories, offices and schools were observed during the epidemic. The incidence of disease was not significantly reduced by either form of vaccination. A survey was made of epidemics in boarding schools in which some of the pupils had been vaccinated, in six with commercial polyvalent vaccine and in five with HK; there was a lower incidence of influenza in two schools vaccinated 2 or 4 weeks earlier with HK vaccine.     

Safety of a quadrivalent meningococcal serogroups A,C, W and Y conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM) administered with routine infant vaccinations: Results of an open-label,randomized, phase 3b controlled study in healthy infants

Background

The highest risk for invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is in infants aged <1 year. Quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccination has the potential to prevent IMD caused by serogroups A, C, W and Y. This phase 3b, multinational, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluated the safety of a 4-dose series of MenACWY-CRM, a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, concomitantly administered with routine vaccinations to healthy infants.

Methods

Two-month-old infants were randomized 3:1 to receive MenACWY-CRM with routine vaccines or routine vaccines alone at ages 2, 4, 6 and 12 months. Adverse events (AEs) that were medically attended and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from all subjects from enrollment through 18 months of age. In a subset, detailed safety data (local and systemic solicited reactions and all AEs) were collected for 7 days post vaccination. The primary objective was a non-inferiority comparison of the percentages of subjects with ≥1 severe systemic reaction during Days 1–7 after any vaccination of MenACWY-CRM plus routine vaccinations versus routine vaccinations alone (criterion: upper limit of 95% confidence interval [CI] of group difference <6%).

Results

A total of 7744 subjects were randomized with 1898 in the detailed safety arm. The percentage of subjects with severe systemic reactions was 16% after MenACWY-CRM plus routine vaccines and 13% after routine vaccines alone (group difference 3.0% (95% CI −0.8, 6.4%). Although the non-inferiority criterion was not met, post hoc analysis controlling for significant center and group-by-center differences revealed that MenACWY-CRM plus routine vaccinations was non-inferior to routine vaccinations alone (group difference −0.1% [95% CI −4.9%, 4.7%]). Rates of solicited AEs, medically attended AEs, and SAEs were similar across groups.

Conclusion

In a large multinational safety study, a 4-dose series of MenACWY-CRM concomitantly administered with routine vaccines was clinically acceptable with a similar safety profile to routine vaccines given alone.     

Long-term Efficacy of Oil-adjuvant Influenza Vaccine in an Industrial Population

The mild influenza epidemic of mixed A and B strains early in 1966 provided an opportunity to assess the efficacy of an oil-adjuvant influenza vaccine which had been administered more than two years earlier to 1,341 volunteers at two U.K. Atomic Energy Authority establishments. At the 5% confidence level, a statistically significant reduction in sickness absence due to influenza was found in this vaccinated group when compared with a control group of 918 employees. This trend was observed at both establishments. Some confirmation was thus obtained of serological predictions that protection would last two to three years or longer after inoculation. There was some indication that the vaccine might be more effective in older workers. This trial suggests the need for more long-term evaluation of oil-adjuvant influenza vaccines.     

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety of newly adjuvanted vaccines among children

IntroductionNew adjuvants such as the AS- or the MF59-adjuvants improve vaccine efficacy and facilitate dose-sparing. Their use in influenza and malaria vaccines has resulted in a large body of evidence on their clinical safety in children.MethodsWe carried out a systematic search for safety data from published clinical trials on newly adjuvanted vaccines in children ≤10 years of age. Serious adverse events (SAEs), solicited AEs, unsolicited AEs and AEs of special interest were evaluated for four new adjuvants: the immuno-stimulants containing adjuvant systems AS01 and AS02, and the squalene containing oil-in-water emulsions AS03 and MF59. Relative risks (RR) were calculated, comparing children receiving newly adjuvanted vaccines to children receiving other vaccines with a variety of antigens, both adjuvanted and unadjuvanted.ResultsTwenty-nine trials were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 25,056 children who received at least one dose of the newly adjuvanted vaccines. SAEs did not occur more frequently in adjuvanted groups (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.75–0.96). Our meta-analyses showed higher reactogenicity following administration of newly adjuvanted vaccines, however, no consistent pattern of solicited AEs was observed across adjuvant systems. Pain was the most prevalent AE, but often mild and of short duration. No increased risks were found for unsolicited AEs, febrile convulsions, potential immune mediated diseases and new onset of chronic diseases.ConclusionsOur meta-analysis did not show any safety concerns in clinical trials of the newly adjuvanted vaccines in children ≤10 years of age. An unexplained increase of meningitis in one Phase III AS01-adjuvanted malaria trial and the link between narcolepsy and the AS03-adjuvanted pandemic vaccine illustrate that continued safety monitoring is warranted.     

Porcine rotavirus strain Gottfried-based human rotavirus candidate vaccines: construction and characterization

Rotavirus gastroenteritis remains the leading cause of severe diarrheal disease in infants and young children worldwide, and thus, a safe and effective rotavirus vaccine is urgently needed in both developing and developed countries. Various candidate rotavirus vaccines that were developed by us and others have been or are being evaluated in different populations in various parts of the world. We have recently confirmed that a porcine rotavirus Gottfried strain bears a P (VP4) serotype (P2B[6]) closely related to human rotavirus P serotype 2A[6] which is of epidemiologic importance in some regions of the world. Based on the modified Jennerian approach to immunization, we have constructed 11 Gottfried-based single VP7 or VP4 gene substitution reassortant vaccine candidates which could provide: (i) an attenuation phenotype of a porcine rotavirus in humans; and (ii) antigenic coverage for G serotypes 1-6 and 8-10 and P serotype 1A[8], 1B[4] and 2A[6]. In addition, following immunization of guinea pigs with Gottfried VP4, we found low but consistent levels of neutralizing antibodies to VP4 with P1A[8] or P1B[4] specificity, both of which are of global epidemiologic importance. Thus, porcine-based VP7 reassortant rotavirus vaccines may provide an advantage over rhesus- or bovine-based VP7 reassortant vaccines since the VP4s of the latter vaccines do not evoke antibodies capable of neutralizing the viruses bearing P1A[8], P1B[4] or P2A[6] VP4.     

A combined liquid Hib (PRP-OMPC), hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell pertussis vaccine: controlled studies of immunogenicity and reactogenicity

We evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a new liquid pentavalent combination vaccine, which incorporates a diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTP) with Hib (PRP-OMPC) and hepatitis B vaccine (HB), in a series of three studies involving 2156 infants. The vaccination schedule was 2, 4, 6 and 18 months for all studies. In addition, subjects in the third study also received a dose of monovalent hepatitis B vaccine at birth. The principal study was a randomised double blind trial of two separate, but concurrently administered vaccines in each of three groups: pentavalent vaccine [DTP-Hib-HB] plus placebo (Group A, n=619); quadrivalent vaccine [DTP-HB] plus Hib vaccine (Group B, n=620); and bivalent vaccine [Hib-HB] plus DTP (Group C, n=226). The second study (Group D, n=231) was an open trial of three separate, but concurrently administered licensed control vaccines (DTP, Hib and HB). The third study (Group E, n=460) administered a dose of monovalent hepatitis B vaccine at birth followed by pentavalent vaccine as for Group A. Subjects were bled prior to the 2- and 18-month vaccinations, and a month after the 6- and 18-month vaccinations. A diary card was used to record subject temperatures and other systemic and local clinical signs for 7 days after each vaccination. The pentavalent vaccine, whether or not preceded by a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine, was generally well tolerated at all administration times, and had a reactogenicity profile similar to that observed for licensed vaccine controls. Diphtheria and tetanus antibody levels were substantially above protective levels in all study groups. The anti-HBs responses (% > or = 10 mIU/ml) following the 6-month dose of vaccines were, respectively, for Groups A-E: 83.2, 91.7, 96.5, 98.8 and 93.9%, and following the 18-month doses: 87.9, 97.5, 98.8, 98.8 and 92.8%. Anti-PRP responses (% > or = 1.0 microg/ml) following the 6-month dose for Groups A-D were 86.0, 90.5, 91.2, and 74.4%, and after the 18-month dose for Groups A-E were 97.3, 98.3, 98.1, 97.0, and 99.5%. Consistently higher geometric mean titres (GMTs) for pertussis antibodies to agglutinogens (Agg2, Agg3) and pertactin were recorded for the pentavalent vaccine compared to the licensed control vaccine, though they were somewhat lower for pertussigen (PT). Except for the hepatitis B response, antibody responses induced by the pentavalent vaccine to all antigens with a schedule commencing at 2 months of age and completed at 18 months were equivalent to responses to the same antigens induced by the separate, but concurrently administered licensed control vaccines. A regimen of a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine followed by pentavalent vaccine at 2, 4, 6 and 18 months was not countered by any clinically significant decrease in seroresponses.     

Usage of quadrivalent influenza vaccine among children in the United States, 2013–14

Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for everyone ≥6 months in the U.S. During the 2013–14 influenza season, in addition to trivalent influenza vaccines, quadrivalent vaccines were available, protecting against two influenza A and two influenza B viruses. We analyzed 1,976,443 immunization records from six sentinel sites to compare influenza vaccine usage among children age 6 months–18 years. A total of 983,401 (49.8%) influenza vaccine doses administered were trivalent and 920,333 (46.6%) were quadrivalent (unknown type: 72,709). Quadrivalent vaccine administration varied by age and was least frequent among those <2 years of age.     

An open-label,comparative, single dose,clinical Phase Ⅰ study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of typhoid conjugate vaccine (Vi-CRM197) in healthy Filipino adults

An injectable typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV) provides longer-lasting protection, requires fewer doses, and is suitable for children aged >2 years. In addition, TCV is preferred at most ages owing to its improved immunological properties as it overcomes the limitation of Vi polysaccharide vaccines. Here, we assessed the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a TCV, Vi-CRM197, termed EuTCV, in an open-label clinical phase I study in healthy Filipino adults. This study was conducted in 75 healthy adults aged 18–45 years who were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio based on the vaccines administered: EuTCV (Test), Typbar-TCV® (WHO prequalified vaccine) and Typhim Vi® (Vi polysaccharide vaccine). The study vaccines were administered at a dose of 25 µg of Vi-CRM197 conjugate by intramuscular injection as a single dose to each of the 25 participants/group, and their immunogenicity and overall safety were assessed for 42 days post-vaccination. All study participants (n = 25/group) completed the trial without dropouts. There were no deaths, SAEs, or events leading to premature withdrawal from the study. Anti-Vi IgG antibody titer (geometric mean titer) of EuTCV group on day 42 was 65.325 [95% CI (36.860, 115.771)], which was significantly higher than that of the WHO prequalified TCV [24.795, 95% CI (16.164, 38.033) p = 0.0055] and the Vi polysaccharide vaccine [7.998, 95% CI (3.800, 16.835) p < 0.0001]. Moreover, the seroconversion rate of EuTCV and Typbar-TCV® was 100%, but that of Typhim Vi® was only 84%. The IgG1–3 subclass titers and serum bactericidal assay results in the EuTCV group showed higher and better bactericidal capacity than the other groups. EuTCV was well tolerated and exhibited an acceptable safety profile in the study population. The Vi-CRM197 conjugate dose of 25 μg may be considered effective in terms of efficacy and safety.ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03956524.     

Influenza vaccination with live-attenuated and inactivated virus-vaccines during an outbreak of disease.

Immunization procedures with live attenuated and inactivated vaccines were carried out on a group of young recruits at the beginning of an outbreak of infection due to an A/Victoria/3/75-related virus strain, which occurred in February 1977 in a military camp. A retrospective investigation on protection from clinical influenza was then performed in order to investigate whether immunization with live virus vaccines, administered at the beginning of an epidemic, could provide early protection from the disease. In the course of the two weeks following vaccination, laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza cases occurred in 4 subjects among the 110 volunteers of the control group which received placebo, and in 8, 7 and 4 subjects respectively of the 3 groups of about 125 individuals, each of which received one of the following vaccine preparations: (a), live attenuated A/Victoria/3/75 influenza virus oral vaccine, grown on chick embryo kidney culture; (b), live attenuated nasal vaccine, a recombinant of A/Puerto Rico/8/34 with A/Victoria/3/75 virus; and (c), inactivated A/Victoria/3/75 virus intramuscular vaccine. These data do not support the hypothesis that, during an epidemic of infection, early protection from clinical influenza can be achieved through immunization with live attenuated or inactivated influenza virus vaccines, in spite of the high immunizing capability of the vaccine preparations.     

A prophylactic hepatitis B vaccine with a novel adjuvant system

Studies with recombinant hepatitis B vaccines show seroprotection rates varying between 91 and 100%. Thus, a limited risk may remain for non-responding populations (e.g. non-responders, haemodialysis patients, elderly) who could benefit from a more immunogenic hepatitis B vaccine. One strategy to enhance the immune response is the use of novel adjuvants. SmithKline Beecham has developed a new adjuvant system containing alum and 3-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A: SBAS4 (SmithKline Beecham Adjuvant System 4). Pilot studies showed that SBAS4 improved in vivo humoral and in vitro cellular immune responses compared to the response to classical recombinant hepatitis B vaccines and was safe and well-tolerated. Several studies assessed the profile of the HBsAg/SBAS4 vaccine in a healthy population, non-responders or elderly. In general the HBsAg/SBAS4 vaccine was well tolerated. Compared to an established recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, we observed an increased local reactogenicity but few symptoms were reported as severe. The HBsAg/SBAS4 vaccine elicits a strong immune response: subjects are protected faster and the GMTs are usually much higher. HBsAg/SBAS4 thus has the potential to protect those subjects who fail to be protected by well established hepatitis B vaccines.