Examining adolescents’ opioid knowledge and likelihood to utilize an educational game to promote medication safety

BackgroundAdolescents' knowledge on opioids is seldom studied, despite the fact young people are one of the groups most affected by the opioid crisis within the United States. There is a need to understand adolescents’ perceptions about opioid misuse and safety to create the necessary tools to educate adolescents on safe opioid use.ObjectiveThis study sought to understand adolescents’ knowledge and perceptions of opioid use and safety as well as their receptiveness to using an educational game for improving medication safety knowledge.MethodsA 67-item survey was developed to assess adolescents' opioid perceptions, knowledge, and the likelihood of an educational game to enhance their opioid medication safety. A nationally representative sample of US adolescents aged 12 to 18 were recruited via a Qualtrics participant panel to complete the online survey from October through November 2020. Survey questions were grouped into 10 categories to represent key concepts and summarized into concept scores. Concepts were described through means, median, and range as well as percent correct for individual questions. Differences between groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Concept scores and their relation to the participant's age were described by the Pearson's correlation coefficient and the linear model coefficient.ResultsA total of 592 responses were analyzed. Male and older participants reported greater perceived opioid knowledge than females. White participants reported higher rates of perceived opioid knowledge, behavioral intent, and knowledge of safe medication disposal than any other racial group. About 80% of participants were receptive to the use of an educational game to increase their opioid safety knowledge.ConclusionsThere are discrepancies in adolescents' knowledge on opioid safety and harm amongst genders, race, and age. Study findings support the use of an educational game to increase adolescents’ opioid knowledge. Future studies should design an educational game intended for a diverse audience.     

Promoting opioid overdose prevention and recovery: An exploratory study of an innovative intervention model to address opioid abuse

BackgroundFatal opioid overdose is a national public health concern in the United States and a critical problem confronting New Jersey’s addiction treatment system. New Jersey developed an innovative program, the Opioid Overdose Recovery Program (OORP), to address the epidemic and the issue of low treatment admissions following a non-fatal overdose. The OORP utilizes an intervention model with peer recovery specialists (RSs) and patient navigators (PNs) to engage individuals within emergency departments (EDs) immediately following an opioid overdose reversal. The purpose of this exploratory s/tudy was to examine the process through which the OORP was implemented in its first year and determine facilitators and barriers to implementation.MethodsData were collected in 2016–2017, through 17 telephone interviews and focus groups with 39 participants. Participants were OORP staff and stakeholders selected through purposeful, non-random sampling. Standardized, open-ended interview guides were used. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify, analyze, and report overall patterns.ResultsParticipants detailed stories from the field and policymakers illuminated the process of implementation. Findings revealed logistical barriers to treatment including patients’ lack of insurance and cell phones, lack of immediately available detox beds, and program ineligibility for some patients due to medical conditions. The model using peers as first responders had a positive impact as their experiences with addiction enabled them to more successfully engage patients. The PNs were critical in addressing high needs for case management and referral and external partners were also important for implementation.ConclusionsResults underscore the effort needed to integrate this important model within EDs as part of a multi-level approach to address opioid misuse. The identified challenges led to statewide strategic planning and areas for further development. OORP is a promising intervention that might increase the number of individuals suffering with opioid disorders linked to peer support, treatment and recovery.     

From education to practice: Addressing opioid misuse through health care provider training: A special issue of Substance Abuse journal

ABSTRACT

Opioid misuse may be ignored by providers who are unwilling or not confident in engaging the complex nature of substance use disorders among their patient populations. Addiction is a complex disease, and although providers often are comfortable in identifying, assessing, and treating the complex diseases of their patients, basic knowledge and skills of identification, assessment, and treatment expertise involving opioids for pain, addressing opioid misuse, and treatment of opioid use disorder are lacking. Initiatives to improve knowledge of opioid use, misuse, and opioid use disorder among health care providers are emerging. In this issue of the Substance Abuse journal, we examine the science and evidence base of educational interventions and public initiatives addressing opioid use and addiction. These initiatives include naloxone rescue awareness and programs, community-based training initiatives, and system or public health approaches to improve student, trainee, and clinician education/training revolving around opioid misuse and opioid use disorder. We call on stakeholders to fund more research to investigate and implement the proven means to educate undergraduate students, graduate trainees, and clinicians regarding pain and addiction. We also recognize the 2016 peer reviewers of our journal who have performed meritorious, volunteer service to advance the science of addiction.     

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the revised Patients’ Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in French

BackgroundThe revised Patients’ Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire allows capture of the beliefs and attitudes of older adults and caregivers towards deprescribing.ObjectivesTo translate and validate the rPATD questionnaire into French.MethodsThe French rPATD was translated using forward-backward translation. Psychometric properties were evaluated in both older adults ≥65 years living in the community or in institutions and who were taking at least one chronic medication and in caregivers of older adults with similar characteristics. Participants were recruited in four French-speaking countries (Belgium, Canada, France and Switzerland). Face and content validity were assessed during the translation process. Construct validity (exploratory factor analysis (EFA)) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) were investigated in questionnaires without missing data. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) in a sample of participants.ResultsIn total, 320 questionnaires from older adults and 215 questionnaires from caregivers were included to evaluate construct validity and internal consistency. EFA extracted four factors in the older adults' and caregivers' versions of the questionnaire consistent with the English rPATD. The extracted factors related to the perceived burden of medication taking, the beliefs in appropriateness of medications, concerns about stopping medications and the level of involvement in making decisions and of knowledge of medications. Internal consistency was satisfactory for three factors for both versions (Cronbach's alpha >0.70), with lower internal consistency in the concerns about stopping factor. Test-retest reliability was overall good for all factors in the caregivers' version (ICC > 0.75) while for the older adults' version, moderate (ICC range: 0.75–0.50) to good ICC values were found.ConclusionsThe French rPATD presents globally good psychometric properties and can be used to explore attitudes towards deprescribing in French-speaking older adults and caregivers.     

Circumstances and contexts of heroin initiation following non-medical opioid analgesic use in New York City

BackgroundAs the prevalence of opioid analgesic (OA) misuse and associated harms have increased in the United States, the prevalence of heroin use and rates of unintentional overdose have concurrently risen. Research has begun to identify connections between OA misuse and heroin use, although this relationship remains under explored. The present study explores the context of heroin initiation among persons with histories of OA misuse in New York City.MethodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 31 individuals with histories of OA misuse who initiated heroin use within the past five years. Data were collected between August 2013 and January 2015. All participants’ OA misuse temporally preceded their heroin use. Interviews were coded and analyzed utilizing thematic qualitative methods.ResultsParticipants ranged in age from 18 to 44 years; 25 identified as male and 30 identified as non-Hispanic white and heterosexual. All participants had stable housing at the time of interview and all were high school graduates. Participants described several key points of transition along their trajectories from OA misuse to heroin initiation: dual- to single-entity OAs; oral to intranasal OA administration; and the development of physical opioid dependence. Participants described the breaking down of heroin-related stigma across social networks as new drug use permeated social groups.ConclusionSeveral points of transition were identified in participants’ trajectories from OA misuse to heroin initiation. In particular the development of physical dependence was a critical factor as existing heroin stigma was rapidly overcome in the face of opioid withdrawal. The relatively short time to heroin initiation documented among new user groups serves as an added challenge to the development of interventions.