The right retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic surgery

Retroperitoneal exposure of the abdominal aorta is usually performed through a left flank incision. An alternative approach to the abdominal aorta is described utilizing a right flank incision. Indications for the use of the right retroperitoneal approach during surgery for aortic aneurysms include right renal artery stenosis, right iliac artery aneurysm, need for simultaneous cholecystectomy, multiple or recent intraabdominal procedures, and sigmoid colostomy. A series of 17 patients is presented to illustrate the utility of this approach. There was one operative death in an emergent patient; the cause of death was not related to the method of aortic exposure. The remaining patients recovered quickly. The anatomic advantages and limitations of this exposure are discussed. We believe that retroperitoneal aortic exposure is superior to midline transperitoneal exposure. Aortic exposure utilizing a right retroperitoneal approach is a useful option in the surgical armamentarium.     

Der retroperitoneale Zugang beim infrarenalen Aortenaneurysma – perioperative Komplikationen und Langzeitergebnisse

The retroperitoneal approach to the infrarenal aortic aneurysm is an alternative to the traditional transperitoneal approach and has been claimed to have a lower early mortality and perioperative morbidity. We retrospectively analyzed 81 infrarenal aneurysms of 215 aortoiliac reconstructions that had been operated between 1993 and 2000 using a retroperitoneal approach. Elective surgery was done in 56 (69%) patients, a symptomatic aneurysm was operated in 18 (22%), and a ruptured aneurysm in 7 patients (9%). Bifurcated grafts were implanted in 72 (89%) and tube grafts in 9 patients (11%). The median follow-up was 4.3 years (0.5–7 years). The 30-day mortality was 1.2%. There was one intraoperative complication (1.2%) related to the retroperitoneal approach. Immediate postoperative extubation was possible in 44 patients (54%); all remaining patients were extubated within 24 h. The median intensive care stay was 3 days; patients without perioperative complications were all discharged home within 1 week. For abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, a routine retroperitoneal approach is an attractive alternative to the median laparotomy. In this series, the retroperitoneal incision was associated with a low mortality and morbidity rate and an uneventful postoperative recovery. This incision was successfully used even for symptomatic and ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms.     

Can the retroperitoneal approach be used for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms?

The retroperitoneal approach for elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms is an accepted alternative to midline transperitoneal approaches and may provide less physiologic insult and a smoother postoperative course. In recent years we have preferentially used the extended retroperitoneal approach for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms to derive similar physiologic benefits for these patients. Over a 6-year period (1983 to 1989) 76 cases of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were treated by emergency aortic replacement. After exclusion of 13 patients whose aneurysmal ruptures were unusual, such as aortoenteric fistula, aortocaval fistula, chronic contained rupture, or visceral involvement, 63 patients were retrospectively studied. Thirty-eight patients were treated via a standard transperitoneal celiotomy and 25 via a left retroperitoneal incision. No significant differences were found between the two groups in regard to cardiac or pulmonary function or duration of preoperative hypotension. Operative mortality was lower in the retroperitoneal group (three of 25, 12%) as compared to the transperitoneal group (13 of 38, 34.2%). Furthermore, the retroperitoneal group required less ventilatory support and tolerated enteral feedings quickly. Length of stay in the hospital was also significantly reduced in the retroperitoneal group. These data indicate that many ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms can be successfully treated through the left retroperitoneal approach. In this nonrandomized clinical series increased survival rates and shorter periods of postoperative recovery were noted in the patients operated with the retroperitoneal approach.     

Left retroperitoneal approach for aortic surgery

Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent surgery of the abdominal aorta by the left retroperitoneal approach. There were 11 suprarenal, 12 juxtarenal, three complicated infrarenal aneurysms and two occlusive aortoiliac disease (considered to be at high risk) undergoing surgical repair. Twenty-one underwent a tube graft repair whilst seven had a bifurcation graft. There were five deaths in this series; four of which occurred in the initial 12 patients. In our initial experience using the left retroperitoneal approach the overall mortality rate was 17%, though this reduced to 6% for the latter half of the study. The retroperitoneal approach allows access to the supracoeliac aorta without the need for thoracotomy and this approach should be considered for all aortoiliac reconstructive surgery.The transabdominal route to the abdominal aorta remains the most commonly used approach. However, the left retroperitoneal approach offers advantages in high-risk patients and suprarenal and juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). This is our initial experience of 28 patients undergoing surgical repair of the abdominal aorta via the left retroperitoneal approach.     

Infrarenal abdominal aortic disease: a review of the retroperitoneal approach

Transabdominal exposure is the most widely used surgical approach to the infrarenal aorta. Over the last 30 years a number of surgeons have championed the retroperitoneal approach for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortoiliac occlusive disease using a variety of incisions. Several studies attest to the clinical superiority of this approach over the transabdominal route and recent evidence demonstrates reduced physiological disturbance with this technique. The retroperitoneal approach is suitable for all elective operations on the abdominal aorta, particularly in patients with high-risk aneurysms and in selected patients with symptomatic and ruptured aneurysms.     

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm

The inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm has received little attention in the literature. To date only four reports have addressed the subject specifically. Controversy remains as to whether this is a variant of the usual atherosclerotic aneurysm or a separate entity. The operative reports of 24 patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms are reviewed; 21 were intact and 3 ruptured. Intact aneurysms ranged in diameter from 5 to 12 cm and the ruptured ones from 5 to 10 cm. Nine patients with intact aneurysms had symptoms of abdominal or back pain. Of 13 patients who underwent excretory pyelography before operation, only 3 had evidence of obstruction. Nine patients had tube grafts placed, 10 had aortoiliac grafts and 5 aortofemoral grafts. There was one intraoperative duodenal injury and in another patient it was necessary to divide the left renal vein for proximal exposure. No attempt was made to expose the ureters at operation. All patients were discharged from hospital. The authors believe that the inflammatory aneurysm is a variant of the abdominal aortic arteriosclerotic aneurysm. Intraoperative complications can be avoided by the recognition of the pathological features.     

The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of retroperitoneal blood in the presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm

The use of computed tomography (CT) in the management of patients who are hemodynamically stable with symptoms suggestive of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and in hemodynamically unstable patients without palpable or known aortic aneurysms was analyzed in a retrospective study. One hundred forty-two CT scans were performed; 48 patients had abdominal aortic aneurysms and 35 had no evidence of rupture or retroperitoneal blood. Ten patients had CT scans that showed evidence of rupture, and three patients had CT scans that were thought to be indeterminate for rupture, probably inflammatory. Forty patients underwent laparotomy. Excluding the three patients with inflammatory aneurysms, the results of CT scanning were compared with the findings at laparotomy. The sensitivity of CT scanning for the diagnosis of retroperitoneal blood in the presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm was 77% and the specificity was 100%, with an overall accuracy of 92%. An algorithm for the management of the patient with symptoms suggestive of a ruptured aneurysm is presented.     

Combined myocardial revascularization and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Myocardial infarction remains the leading cause of early and late deaths after abdominal aortic reconstruction in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Our approach for the past 4 years has been combined myocardial revascularization with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with good left ventricle performance. From July 1984 through June 1989, 128 patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Seventeen patients underwent combined abdominal aortic reconstruction with coronary artery bypass grafting. One patient died (5.9%). The remaining patients are all well at current follow-up. Our experience shows that patients with coronary artery disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm may have both lesions safely repaired as a single operative procedure.     

Early and mid-term results of endovascular stent grafting for aortic aneurysms]

Early and mid-term clinical results of 28 cases of endovascular stent grafting for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms and 11 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysms are reported. Early clinical results: Among 28 patients (7 true thoracic aortic aneurysms, 3 pseudothoracic aortic aneurysms and 8 acute, 4 subacute, and 6 chronic aortic dissections), two patients (7.1%) with ruptured acute aortic dissection or ruptured infected pseudoaneurysm died in the perioperative period. Two of the remaining 26 patients experienced minor complications. Aneurysmal sacs or false lumens at the descending thoracic aorta were completely thrombosed in the 26 patients. One patient (9.1%) with a ruptured abdominal aneurysm died, and one of the remaining 10 patients had renal and peripheral emboli and peripheral vascular trauma. Inadvertent covering of the renal arteries occurred in another patient. Unless one patient had persistent endoleak, aneurysmal sacs in the 10 surviving patients were thrombosed. Mid-term clinical results: One aortic dissection at a different section of the descending aorta occurred 6 months after stent grafting for aortic dissection, and one patient died of pneumonia 3 months after stent grafting for an abdominal aortic aneurysm. CT scanning 6 months after stent grafting revealed a decrease in maximal aneurysmal size in 3 of 9 patients with true or pseudothoracic aneurysms and in 2 of 5 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Five of 9 patients with stent grafting for acute or subacute dissection showed elimination of the false lumen in the descending thoracic aorta in a CT scan 6 months after grafting. One patient with a true thoracic aneurysm and one patient with an abdominal aortic aneurysm showed an increase in aneurysmal size in a CT scan 2 years and one year after treatment, respectively.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm in south-west Scotland

Between 1977 and 1988, 155 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Dumfries and Galloway health region were traced. One hundred and six patients underwent surgery; 57 elective operations for non-leaking aneurysms were performed locally without mortality, and of the 49 patients operated on with ruptured aneurysm, 11 were transferred to a major vascular centre with four deaths (36% mortality rate). The remaining 38 patients were treated locally. Twenty-three of these were operated on by a surgeon with vascular interest with nine deaths (39% mortality rate) and of the remaining 15 patients operated on by a surgeon without a vascular interest, ten died (66% mortality rate). These findings emphasize that patients presenting at a district hospital with leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm should be transferred to a major vascular unit if there is no local vascular expertise available, and our figures suggest that transfer of such patients does not prejudice survival. Further, of those patients who died of leaking aneurysm in hospital without undergoing surgery (25 patients), 15 were in hospital for longer than 3 h without the correct diagnosis. A significant improvement in mortality could follow prompt and accurate diagnosis at hospital level, with the most common error in diagnosis being renal colic.     

Extraperitoneal approach for repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms are characterized by dense perianeurysmal fibrosis involving the adjacent organs. Attempts to isolate the aneurysm can lead to operative injuries of these structures, thus increasing the rates of complications and mortality. In the last 12 years 45 patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent aneurysm resection at the Department of Vascular Surgery of the University of Rome. The aneurysm was resected through a standard, midline transperitoneal approach in 39 patients, through a thoracophrenolaparotomy in two patients, and through a left-flank extraperitoneal approach in the last four patients. The extraperitoneal approach simplified aneurysm dissection and aortic clamping with no cases of postoperative morbidity or death. In addition, we reviewed the CT scan findings of 12 patients surgically treated for inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm. The amount of fibrosis in the anterior wall of the aneurysm was greater than in the left posterolateral aspect (p = 0.008). We conclude that the left-flank extraperitoneal approach is the most anatomically advantageous route for repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm.     

The retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery associated with horseshoe kidney.

The horseshoe kidney is a rare anomaly that can significantly complicate aortic surgery. A bulky isthmus, abnormalities of renal anatomy, and a variable blood supply associated with a horseshoe kidney can pose technical difficulties in terms of aortic reconstruction. The left retroperitoneal approach affords an excellent exposure of the abdominal aorta in patients with a horseshoe kidney without dividing the renal isthmus and avoids the risk of injury to a ureter in an anomalous location. This is a case report of a patient with a horseshoe kidney who underwent a successful repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm by a left retroperitoneal approach.     

Surgical treatment of multiple aortic aneurysm

Ten patients with multiple aortic aneurysms of both thoracic and abdominal aortic aorta, were evaluated clinically. The abdominal operations preceded the thoracic operations in the seven patients, and the four of them underwent two-staged operations with good results. Residual aneurysm ruptured in two patients and one patient died on the first operation because of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. The thoracic operations preceded the abdominal operations in the three patients, and one of them underwent a two-staged operation with good result. Because the risk of rupture of the unrepaired aneurysm is high, the treatment of the second aneurysm should be done in a short period.     

Current status of the use of retroperitoneal approach for reconstructions of the aorta and its branches.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to determine whether retroperitoneal approach for aortic surgery has certain physiologic, technical advantages. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic reconstruction classically had been reserved for select patients with either high-risk comorbid disease or specific anatomic problems that preclude the transabdominal approach. With increasing appreciation of the physiologic, anatomic, and technical advantages of the extended posterolateral retroperitoneal approach, the authors have expanded its use for repair of all types of aortic visceral and renal artery disease as well as ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and infected aortic grafts. METHODS: From January 1981 to September 1995, 2340 retroperitoneal aortoiliac reconstructions were performed in 2243 patients. Aortic reconstructions accounted for 1756 cases: 1109 for elective abdominal aortic aneurysms, 210 for ruptured and symptomatic aortic aneurysms, 399 for occlusive disease, 18 for infected aortic grafts, and 20 for other indications. Iliofemoral disease was the indication for 584 procedures. As experience was gained, this approach also was used for 417 renal and 50 celiac and superior mesenteric artery reconstructions. RESULTS: The mean age was 67 years with 1590 men and 653 women. Overall mortality was 5.2% for all aortic cases: 2.4% for elective, 12.6% for symptomatic, and 29.0% for ruptured aortic aneurysms. Major complications occurred in 12.5% of the elective procedures and in 38.3% of emergency procedures. Over the past 5 years, the average length of hospital for uncomplicated elective abdominal aortic aneurysms was 6.1 days, intensive care unit stay was 0.7 day, and diet was resumed by postoperative day 1. Five-year graft patency was 99% for aneurysms and 95% for occlusive disease. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal approach offers certain physiologic advantages associated with minimal disturbance of gastrointestinal and respiratory function, thereby reducing the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay. In addition, its technical advantages and flexibility facilitates visceral and juxtarenal aortic reconstructions without the need for thoracotomy.     

Results from coronary artery bypass surgery combined abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Complication from coronary artery disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. We report our results from coronary artery bypass surgery performed in combination with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with coronary artery disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm, each being an indication for an emergency operation. METHODS: Seventeen patients underwent combined coronary artery bypass surgery and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The mean age of the patients was 67.6 +/- 5.2 years. Four had left main disease, 8 patients had triple-vessel disease, and 12 had a prior myocardial infarction. The average left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.49 +/- 0.13. The average abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was 6.2 +/- 1.0 cm (range 4.5-8.0 cm). Thirteen patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery followed by abdominal aortic aneurysm repair after discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass. In the remaining four patients, including one patient with severe left ventricular dysfunction, cardiopulmonary bypass was continued as a circulatory assist until the abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was completed. The left internal thoracic artery was used in 14 patients, and the right internal thoracic artery in one patient. RESULTS: Postoperative surgical complications occurred in three patients (bleeding in one patient requiring reoperation, abdominal subcutaneous wound infection in another and transient neural disorder in the others). There were no surgical or in-hospital death. There was no late cardiac complication and no late cardiac death after a mean of 29 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that combined surgery was reasonable for selected patients with combined coronary artery disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm, each of which is an indication for an urgent operation. The aortic aneurysm repair during cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction was safe and effective.     

Midline retroperitoneal versus midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the midline retroperitoneal approach with the midline transperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with respect to operative details, gastrointestinal complications, and wound complications. METHODS: From January 1990 through January 1998, 128 patients underwent elective aortic reconstruction for infrarenal AAA. Of these, 64 patients (the transperitoneal group) underwent conventional transperitoneal midline aortic exposure, whereas the remaining 64 patients (the retroperitoneal group) underwent retroperitoneal midline exposure of the aneurysm. RESULTS: Preclamp time, that is, the time from skin incision to aortic clamping, was significantly shorter in the transperitoneal group than in the retroperitoneal group (P <.001). However, the midline retroperitoneal approach was associated with decreased incidence of ileus (P <.01), earlier resumption of oral intake (P <.01), and decreased wound pain (P <.01), in comparison with the transperitoneal approach. Furthermore, there was no incidence of wound complications such as abdominal bulge or wound pain in any of the patients in the postoperative period or over the long term. CONCLUSIONS: The midline retroperitoneal approach for AAA was associated with fewer postoperative gastrointestinal and wound complications than the midline transperitoneal approach. Over the long term, there was no wound complication such as abdominal bulge and wound pain in any of the patients.     

Temporary closure of the abdominal wall by use of silicone rubber sheets after operative repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Management of patients after operative repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms can be further complicated if primary closure of the abdominal wall cannot be technically accomplished or is associated with profound increases in intraabdominal and peak inspiratory pressures. We recently treated five patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms and one patient with a ruptured thoracoabdominal aneurysm whose abdominal incisions had to be closed with a Dacron reinforced, silicone sheet. All patients were hemodynamically unstable either at admission to the hospital or became so during operation. Four patients required the insertion of a silicone rubber sheet at the primary operation because of massive retroperitoneal hematoma or edema of the bowel wall or both. Incisions in two patients were closed primarily, but the patients required reexploration and secondary closure with silicone rubber sheets because of the development of marked increases in peak inspiratory pressures, intraabdominal pressures, and decreased urinary output. Four of the six patients subsequently underwent successful removal of the silicone rubber sheets with delayed primary closure of the abdominal wall, and two others died before removal. The patient with the ruptured thoracoabdominal aneurysm died on postoperative day 20 because of pulmonary sepsis but had a healed abdominal incision. The three surviving patients have been discharged. A silicone rubber sheet may be necessary for closure of the abdominal wall after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients where primary abdominal wall closure is impossible or where it results in compromise in respiratory or renal function.     

Acute pancreatitis after surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis after surgical treatment of non ruptured aneurysm of abdominal aorta is a rare complication, considered to be due to pancreatic ischemia or peroperative trauma of pancreas. The aim of this study is to describe 4 new cases of this complication and to discuss its etiology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1995 to November 2000, 365 patients underwent elective surgery for a non ruptured abdominal aorta aneurysm. Four (1.1%) men, aged 66 to 79 years and operated for an aneurysm which diameter ranged from 60 to 77 mm, developed postoperative acute pancreatitis. The abdominal approach was a midline incision in 3 cases and a retroperitoneal lombotomy in one case. Superior pole of the aneurysm always adjoined or involved the right renal artery. The aortic clamping was supra-renal in 3 cases and celiac in one case. Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was established at days 2, 4, 12, and 23 after surgery on abdominal computed tomography in 3 cases and at reoperation in one case. RESULTS: Three patients died, including 2 from early multiple organ failure and one peroperatively during surgical attempt to treat a prostheto-digestive fistula. One patient was alive and asymptomatic with a 2-years follow-up. CONCLUSION: Acute pancreatitis is a rare and serious complication after surgical treatment of abdominal aorta aneurysm. Its diagnosis is often delayed. The main etiological factor of this complication could be trauma of pancreas during supra-renal clamping through a midline incision.     

Use of omental pedicles in mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

We report a case of a sixty year old man with a mycotic infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm complicated by a left psoas abscess. After treatment with parenteral antibiotics he underwent early aortic reconstruction with an in-situ prosthetic graft wrapped in an omental pedicle. Mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysms can be treated in this way despite the potential for graft infection from persisting retroperitoneal sepsis.     

Left flank retroperitoneal exposure: a technical aid to complex aortic reconstruction

Over the last 5 years an extended left flank retroperitoneal approach was used in 85 of 531 (16%) aortic reconstructions deemed technically complex. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was performed in 70 patients (82%), bypass of aortoiliac occlusive disease was performed in 11 (13%), and aortic endarterectomy for mesenteric and/or renovascular disease was performed in 4 (5%). Indications for use of this approach included a "hostile" abdomen (43 patients), juxta/suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (35), large (greater than 10 cm) abdominal aortic aneurysm (12), extreme obesity (10), associated renal and/or visceral artery stenosis requiring endarterectomy (9), inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (2), and horseshoe kidney (2). Suprarenal or supraceliac aortic clamping, averaging 31 minutes, was required in 43 patients (50%). Postoperative recovery was rapid (average length of stay, 10.2 days), and morbidity was minimal despite the complex nature of these reconstructions. The perioperative mortality rate in elective operations was 1.2%. This approach facilitated proximal abdominal aortic exposure and anastomosis, especially in large, pararenal aneurysms or in situations unfavorable to a transabdominal approach. Whereas a left flank retroperitoneal approach can be used in most aortic reconstructions, it seems especially suited to those that pose significant technical challenges.